DOCSLIB.ORG

World Heritage 33 COM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Heritage 33 COM World Heritage 33 COM Distribution Limited WHC-09/33.COM/20 Seville, 20 July 2009 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-third session Seville, Spain 22-30 June 2009 REPORT OF DECISIONS TABLE OF CONTENT AGENDA ITEM PAGE 2. 2. Requests for Observer status 4 3. 3. Adoption of the Agenda and the Timetable 4 3A. Adoption of the Agenda 3B. Adoption of the Timetable 4. 4. Report of the Rapporteur of the 32nd session of the World N/A Heritage Committee (Quebec, City 2008) 5. 5. Reports of the World Heritage Centre 5A. Report of the World Heritage Centre 5 5B. Report on World Heritage and the Small Island Developing 7 States (SIDS) programme 5C. World Heritage Convention and main multilateral 8 environmental agreements 6. 6. Progress reports on Funding initiatives 8 7. 7. Examination of the State of conservation of World Heritage properties 7.1. Progress report on the preparation of a UNESCO 10 Recommendation on the Conservation of the Historic Urban Landscape 7.2. Report on Reinforced Monitoring 11 7A. State of conservation of the properties inscribed on the List 12 of World Heritage in Danger 7B. State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World 49 Heritage List 7C. Reflection on the trends of the state of conservation 177 8. 8. Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 179 2009, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines Report of decisions of the 33rd session WHC-09/33.COM/20, p. 1 of the World Heritage Committee (Seville, 2009) 8B. Nominations to the World Heritage List 180 8C. Update of the World Heritage List and the List of World 225 Heritage in Danger 8D. Clarifications of property boundaries and sizes by States 227 Parties in response to the Retrospective Inventory 8E. Adoption of retrospective Statements of significance and of 228 Outstanding Universal Value 9. 9. Discussion on the outstanding universal value 228 10. 10. Global Strategy for a representative, balanced and credible World Heritage List 10A. Serial transnational nominations 229 10B. Global training strategy 229 10C. Thematic Studies 230 11. 11. Periodic Reports 11A. Progress report on the Second cycle of Periodic Reporting 231 in the Arab States 11B. Follow up of the Periodic Report for Asia and the Pacific 232 11C. Launching of the second cycle of Periodic Reporting in 233 Africa 12 12. Protection of the Palestinian cultural and natural heritage 234 13. 13. Revision of the Operational Guidelines 235 14. 14A. Reflection on the future of the World Heritage Convention 235 14B. Report by the Chairperson of the Working Group on the 243 election of the members of the World Heritage Committee 14C. Amendments to the Rules of Procedures of the World 243 Heritage Committee 15. 15. International Assistance N/A 16. 16. Report on the execution of the 2008-2009 Budget and 243 adoption of the 2010-2011 Budget 17. 17. Other business 246 Report of decisions of the 33rd session WHC-09/33.COM/20, p. 2 of the World Heritage Committee (Seville, 2009) 18. 18. Election of the Chairperson, Vice-Chairpersons and 247 Rapporteur of the 34th session of the World Heritage Committee (July 2010) 19. 19. Provisional Agenda of the 34th session of the World Heritage 248 Committee (July 2010) Report of decisions of the 33rd session WHC-09/33.COM/20, p. 3 of the World Heritage Committee (Seville, 2009) 2. REQUESTS FOR OBSERVER STATUS Decision: 33 COM 2 The World Heritage Committee, 1. Taking into consideration Rule 8 (Observers) of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee, 2. Authorizes the participation in the 33rd session as observers of those representatives of the international governmental organizations (IGOs), international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), permanent observer missions to UNESCO and non profit-making institutions having activities in the fields covered by the Convention, who have requested observer participation at the session and as listed in Section A of the document WHC- 09/33.COM/2; 3. Further confirms the participation in the 33rd session as observers of all those invited by the Director-General of UNESCO in accordance with Rule 8.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee and as listed in Section B of the document WHC-09/33.COM/2. 3. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA AND THE TIMETABLE 3A. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Decision: 33 COM 3A The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/3A.Rev.2, 2. Adopts the Agenda included in the above-mentioned Document as amended. 3B. ADOPTION OF THE TIMETABLE Decision: 33 COM 3B The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC 09/33.COM/3B.Rev.2, 2. Adopts the timetable included in the above-mentioned Document as amended. Report of decisions of the 33rd session WHC-09/33.COM/20, p. 4 of the World Heritage Committee (Seville, 2009) 5. REPORTS OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE 5A. REPORT OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE Decision: 33 COM 5A The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-09/33.COM/5A, WHC- 09/33.COM/INF.5A.1, WHC-09/33.COM/INF.5A.2, and WHC-09/33.COM/INF.5A.3, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 5 adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Takes note with appreciation of the activities undertaken by the World Heritage Centre over the past year in pursuit of the Committee’s five Strategic Objectives; 4. Takes also note of the findings of the study undertaken by UNESCO’s Internal Oversight Service on the mapping of the workload of the World Heritage Centre presented in Document WHC-09/33.COM/INF.5A.3; 5. Notes with satisfaction that the World Heritage Centre is working with the secretariats of intergovernmental committees of related conventions such as the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, and the Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage-2001 and recommends that such cooperation be encouraged as this would further strengthen the work of the Centre; 6. Requests the World Heritage Centre to prepare a document on the World Heritage Convention and its cooperation and exchange with other conventions and programmes in the field of cultural heritage for discussion at the 34th session of the World Heritage Committee (2010); 7. Also requests the World Heritage Centre, in future reports on activities undertaken, to further strengthen the information and analysis available to States Parties by: a) Retaining the current format to report activities and including an update on progress with implementing the Committee’s decisions, b) Describing the criteria by which the World Heritage Centre makes decisions as to which activities under the Convention it undertakes, c) And including, on a discretionary basis, analysis of strategic issues and new directions; 8. Further requests the World Heritage Centre to produce, on an experimental basis, an indexed audio verbatim recording of the proceedings of the 33rd Session in addition to the standard summary records (as produced since the 26th session of the World Heritage Committee); 9. Notes the outline provided by the World Heritage Centre of its roles and the roles of the Advisory Bodies and agrees that this topic be further discussed at the 34th session of the Committee in 2010 under a separate agenda item; 10. Requests furthermore the World Heritage Centre to outline the forward direction of the World Heritage thematic programmes and initiatives, to enable an Report of decisions of the 33rd session WHC-09/33.COM/20, p. 5 of the World Heritage Committee (Seville, 2009) understanding of how these themes connect with and integrate into general programmes, and how they might be resourced; 11. Notes that the Centre already proactively engages women in its Heritage Programmes in Asia, Africa and the Caribbean as part of its gender balance policy and the provision of equal opportunity to all, and recommends that gender balance and community involvement be prioritized in the Centre’s programmes; 12. Adopts the World Heritage Thematic Programme on Prehistory presented in Annex 1 of document WHC-09/33.COM/5A; 13. Requests the World Heritage Centre to reconsider the term “prehistory”, to better recognize the continuing cultures of indigenous communities, to ensure global representation in the identification and conservation of related properties, and to present a report on progress in developing an Action Plan on Prehistory and World Heritage at its 34th session in 2010; 14. Notes with concern the ongoing destruction of some of these fragile sites, including the recent destruction of the Rock Art sites of Tardrat Acacus in Libya, and requests the State Party to take immediate action and other measures as necessary to address the problem in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and to invite a joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS mission; 15. Expresses its gratitude to the Governments of Bahrain, South Africa and Spain for the financial and technical support for the various international scientific encounters, and recognizes the proposal of the Government of Spain in establishing a centre for the research of Prehistory; 16. Recalling the Decision of the World Heritage Committee 31 COM.21C to carry out a programme of sustainable development concerning the conservation of earthen architecture, thanks the Governments of Italy and France for their support of the programme on earthen architecture in Africa and the Arab States in particular, and requests the potential financial donors and the States Parties to support the implementation of activities and further requests the World Heritage Centre to submit a progress report at its 35th session in 2011; 17.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quarterly Progress Report January-March 2020
    KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD Karnataka Integrated and Sustainable Water Resources Management Investment Program ADB LOAN 3836-IND Quarterly Progress Report January-March 2020 Project Management Unit, KISWRMIP Project Support Consultant SMEC International Pty. Ltd. Australia in association with SMEC (India) Pvt. Ltd. 3 June 2020 Revised 20 June 2020 DOCUMENTS/REPORT CONTROL FORM Report Name Quarterly Progress Report January-March 2020 (draft) Karnataka Integrated and Sustainable Water Resources Management Project Name: Investment Program Project Number: 5061164 Report for: Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd (KNNL) REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by # Dr. Srinivas Mudrakartha Dr Srinivas Dr Srinivas 1 3 June 2020 Mudrakartha/ Mudrakartha/ Balaji Maddikera Gaurav Srivastava Gaurav Srivastava Deepak GN and Team Dr. Srinivas Mudrakartha Dr Srinivas Dr Srinivas Mudrakartha/ Mudrakartha/ 2 20 June 2020 Balaji Maddikera Gaurav Srivastava Gaurav Srivastava Deepak GN and Team ISSUE REGISTER Distribution List Date Issued Number of Copies KNNL 20 June 2020 10 SMEC Staff 20 June 2020 2 Associate (Gaurav Srivastava) 20 June 2020 1 Office Library (Shimoga) 20 June 2020 1 SMEC Project File 20 June 2020 2 SMEC COMPANY DETAILS Dr Janardhan Sundaram, Executive Director 1st Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, Plot Number -18, Sector – 18, Gurgaon – 122016, Haryana Tel: +91 124 4501100 Fax: +91 124 4376018 Email: [email protected]; Website: www.smec.com CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Krishna Temple Complex, Hampi: an Exploration of Its Identity As a Medieval Temple in the Contemporary Context
    THE KRISHNA TEMPLE COMPLEX, HAMPI: AN EXPLORATION OF ITS IDENTITY AS A MEDIEVAL TEMPLE IN THE CONTEMPORARY CONTEXT A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Ashima Krishna January, 2009 © 2009 Ashima Krishna ABSTRACT Hindu temples in India have been in abundance for centuries. However, many have lost their use over time. They lie vacant and unused on vast tracts of land across the Indian subcontinent, in a time when financial resources for the provision of amenities to serve the local community are hard to come by. In the case of Hampi, this strain is felt not only by the community inhabiting the area, but the tourism sector as well. Hampi’s immense significance as a unique Medieval-city in the Indian subcontinent has increased tourist influx into the region, and added pressure on authorities to provide for amenities and facilities that can sustain the tourism industry. The site comprises near-intact Medieval structures, ruins in stone and archaeologically sensitive open land, making provision of tourist facilities extremely difficult. This raises the possibility of reusing one of the abundant temple structures to cater to some of these needs, akin to the Virupaksha Temple Complex and the Hampi Bazaar. But can it be done? There is a significant absence of research on possibilities of reusing a Hindu Temple. A major reason for this gap in scholarship has been due to the nature of the religion of Hinduism and its adherents. Communal and political forces over time have consistently viewed all Hindu temples as cultural patrimony of the people, despite legal ownership resting with the Government of India.
    [Show full text]
  • 44 Th Series of SPP (2020
    KARNATAKA STATE COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bengaluru – 560 012 Website: http://www.kscst.iisc.ernet.in/spp.html || Email: [email protected] || Phone: 080-23341652, 23348840/48/49 44th Series of Student Project Programme: 2020-21 List of Student Project Proposals Approved for Sponsorship 1. A.C.S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, BENGALURU Sl. PROJECT PROJECT TITLE BRANCH COURSE NAME OF THE NAME OF THE STUDENT(S) SANCTIONED No. REFERENCE No. GUIDE(S) AMOUNT (IN Rs.) 1. 44S_BE_1382 FACE MASK DETECTION SYSTEM FOR THE ERA OF COVID-19 USING MACHINE COMPUTER B.E. Prof. POONAM Ms. BHAVANA G 2500.00 LEARNING TECHNIQUES SCIENCE AND KUMARI Ms. CHAITANYASHREE ENGINEERING Ms. KEERTHI L N 2. 44S_BE_1385 IOT BASED UNIT FOR COPD TREATMENT BIOMEDICAL B.E. Dr. ANITHA S Ms. RASHMI S 5500.00 ENGINEERING Ms. POOJA D 3. 44S_BE_1386 PILLBOT: A NONCONTACT MEDICINE DISPENSING ROBOT FOR PATIENTS IN BIOMEDICAL B.E. Prof. NANDITHA Ms. SHEETAL RAMESH 5000.00 QUARANTINE ENGINEERING KRISHNA Ms. R NAVYA SREE Ms. RAJESHWARI SAJITH Mr. S KOSAL RAMJI 4. 44S_BE_3064 PAIN RELIEF DEVICE FOR THE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE BIOMEDICAL B.E. Prof. HEMANTH Ms. SHREYA CHAKRAVARTHY 5000.00 ENGINEERING KUMAR G Ms. M VAGDEVI Ms. SHREE GOWRI M H Ms. SPOORTHI N K 5. 44S_BE_3066 FABRICATION OF SHEET METAL CUTTING MACHINE AND FOOT STEP POWER MECHANICAL B.E. Prof. SUNIL RAJ B A Mr. LOHITH M C 7000.00 GENERATION ENGINEERING Mr. NITISH G Mr. VINOD KUMAR K Mr. ANIL KUMAR 6. 44S_BE_4243 INTEGRATION OF BIODEGRADABLE COMPOSITES IN AIRCFART STRUCTURES AERONAUTICAL B.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: India
    Chapter 6: India Subhash Kak Our understanding of archaeoastronomical sites in India is based not only on a rich archaeological record and texts that go back thousands of years, but also on a living tradition that is connected to the past. Conversely, India has much cultural diversity and a tangled history of interactions with neighbouring regions that make the story complex. The texts reveal to us the cosmological ideas that lay behind astronomical sites in the historical period and it is generally accepted that the same ideas also apply as far back as the Harappan era of the third millennium BC. In the historical period, astronomical observatories were part of temple complexes where the king was consecrated. Such consecration served to confirm the king as the foremost devotee of the chosen deity, who was taken to be the embodiment of time and the universe. For example, Udayagiri, located a few km from Vidisha in central India, is an astronomical site connected with the Classical age of the Gupta dynasty (320–500 AD). The imperial Guptas enlarged the site, an ancient hilly observatory going back at least to the 2nd century BC, at which observations were facilitated by the geographical features of the hill, into a sacred landscape to represent royal authority. Indian astronomy is characterised by the concept of ages of successively longer durations, which is itself an instance of the pervasive general idea of recursion, or repetition of patterns across space, scale and time. An example of this is the division of the ecliptic into 27 star segments ( nakshatras ), with which the moon is conjoined in its monthly circuit; each of these segments is further divided into 27 sub-segments ( upa-nakshatras ), and the successive divisions of the day into smaller measures of 30 units.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment
    Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 43253-026 November 2019 India: Karnataka Integrated and Sustainable Water Resources Management Investment Program – Project 2 Vijayanagara Channels Main Report Prepared by Project Management Unit, Karnataka Integrated and Sustainable Water Resources Management Investment Program Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd. for the Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in June 2019 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/ind-43253-026-eia-0 This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD Karnataka Integrated and Sustainable Water Resources Management Investment Program ADB LOAN No. 3172-IND VIJAYANAGARA CHANNELS FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT Volume 2a: Environmental Impact Assessment Project Management Unit, KISWRMIP Project Support Consultant SMEC International Pty. Ltd. Australia in association with SMEC (India) Pvt. Ltd. Final Revision: 16 September 2019 VNC Feasibility Study Report Volume
    [Show full text]
  • State of Conservation Report Regarding Progress So Far Made with Regard to the Recommendations of the World Heritage Committee in Decision 37COMB.61
    Name of the Property: Group of Monuments at Hampi (India) (C 241) State of Conservation report regarding progress so far made with regard to the recommendations of the World Heritage Committee in Decision 37COMB.61. 1. Response from the State Party to the World Heritage Committee’s Decision, 37 COM 7B.61 , paragraph by paragraph A. Removal of debris of the collapsed bridge and the relocation of the vehicular bridge outside of the property; The Public Works Department of Government of Karnataka, has resumed the work of removing the remaining part of the collapsed bridge viz., debris, columns and carriageway, without disturbing the nearby cultural resources, by adopting state of the art technology and the work is almost complete. As regards the relocation of the vehicular bridge, cultural impact assessment study has been completed and location of the vehicular bridge as recommended in the impact assessment study has been identified. B. Completed Integrated Management Plan together with a synthesis and a prioritisation of existing recommendations and intentions, for review by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies - The Integrated Management Plan (draft already submitted to the WHC in 2006) gives an overall framework for the Management & protection of Hampi World Heritage Site. It is reiterated that as per the draft IMP recommendations the following actions have been implemented since January 2006 by Government of Karnataka and Archaeological Survey of India. Sno IMP recommendation Agency 1 Preparing a official Base Map HWHAMA
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Landscapes of Heritage
    Sustaining Landscapes of Cultural Heritage: The Case of Hampi, India Final Report to The Global Heritage Fund Produced by Morgan Campbell 2012 Sustaining Landscapes of Heritage This report is the result of the Global Heritage Fund’s 2011 Preservation Fellowship Program. Research was undertaken by Morgan Campbell, a PhD student of Urban Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University, during the summer of 2012. Global Heritage Fund Morgan Campbell 625 Emerson Street 200 [email protected] Palo Alto, CA 94301 www.globalheritagefund.org Sustaining Landscapes of Heritage ii Dedication I am incredibly grateful to numerous people for a variety of reasons. My time in Hampi during the summer of 2012 was one of the most significant experiences in my life. First, I dedicate this work to the Global Heritage Fund for providing me with the support to pursue questions of participatory planning in Hampi’s World Heritage Area. I thank James Hooper, whose earlier research in Hampi provided me with a good foundation and Dan Thompson who was incredibly understanding and supportive. Second, I’m deeply indebted to Shama Pawar of The Kishkindra Trust in Anegundi. Easily one of the most dynamic people I’ve ever met, without her assistance—which came in the form of conversations, tangible resources, and informal mentoring—I would have never been able to undergo this research project. It was because of Shama that I was able to experience and learn from Hampi’s living heritage. This report is about people, people who live in a heritage landscape. The residents of Hampi’s World Heritage Area are spread across time and space, so that when I say residents, I am referring to those living in the present and those who have lived in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage 32 COM
    World Heritage 32 COM Distribution Limited WHC-08/32.COM/7B Paris, 22 May 2008 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE World Heritage Committee Thirty-Second Session Quebec City, Canada 2 - 10 July 2008 Item 7B of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of World Heritage properties inscribed on the World Heritage List SUMMARY As per Decision 7 EXT.COM 4B.1, paragraph 9, this document contains information on the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List, and is separated in three categories: 1. State of conservation reports for adoption requiring discussion by the World Heritage Committee, and especially concerning properties considered for in- Danger listing; 2. State of conservation reports for adoption requiring no discussion by the World Heritage Committee. Decision required: The World Heritage Committee is requested to review the reports on the state of conservation of properties contained in this document. In certain cases, the World Heritage Committee may wish to decide to discuss in detail the state of conservation reports which are submitted for adoption without discussion. The World Heritage Committee may wish to adopt the draft Decision presented at the end of each state of conservation report. The full reports of Reactive Monitoring missions requested by the World Heritage Committee are available at the following Web address in their original language: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2008/ State of conservation of World Heritage properties WHC-08/32.COM/7B, p. 2 inscribed on the World Heritage List Table of content I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruins Amongst the Boulders: Hampi, Anegundi, and Badami 25–29 December 2018 (4 Nights / 5 Days)
    Ruins amongst the Boulders: Hampi, Anegundi, and Badami 25–29 December 2018 (4 nights / 5 days) Take a journey back in time to an age of splendour and glory. Feel the stress of city life fade away amidst boulder-strewn hills in the most magical part of the Tungabhadra Valley. At Hampi, the river unites two distinct cultures. We have the ancient, mysterious ruins of the Vijayanagara Empire, on the one hand, which somehow blends seamlessly with a unique hippy philosophy, on the other. Thus, music, drum circles, dance. And jam sessions add to the fun of traipsing among India’s finest ruins. In short, Hampi is not just a place to reconnect with our heritage, but also to chill and have fun in what is surely the most bizarrely stunning landscape in the entire Deccan Plateau. Soak in the incredibly rich historical past of a forgotten civilization as we walk in the footsteps of kings, past ruins that will come alive on this unique tour. Tales of past kings, bloody wars, triumphs, and tragic defeats will leap to life for you, unlike the pages of a dusty history book or a run-of-the-mill guided tour. Rejuvenate your mind and spirit as you indulge in a predawn coracle ride across the Tungabhadra. Huff and puff to the top of the Matanga Hill to be rewarded with one of the best views of the rising sun that South India has to offer. Stay at an eco-friendly hotel, set in a tiny, rustic village, tucked away from the hustle and bustle of Hampi Bazaar.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHEME of MINING Submitted Under Rule 12(2) of MCDR 1988 Period from 2016-17 to 2020-21 Expiry of the Lease: 22.05.2021
    SCHEME OF MINING Submitted under Rule 12(2) of MCDR 1988 Period from 2016-17 to 2020-21 Expiry of the Lease: 22.05.2021 'A' CATEGORY, FULLY MECHANISED, NON-CAPTIVE, OPEN-CAST MINE O f RAJA KRISHNA DEVA RAYA (RKDR) IRON ORE MINE, M.L. No. 2584 Total Extent: 31.00 Ha. as per ML Deed, [32.05 Ha. as per C E C Survey] - Forest Land Location: North-East Block Range, Kallahalli Village, HospetTaluka, Bellary Dist. OF M/s. AUR0 MINE Prepared By Shri. Gopalakrishna V. Gaonkar Reg. No. RQP/BNG/333/2014/A January / M ay-2 016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Para Particular Page INTRODUCTION 01-03 1.0 General 03-04 2.0 Location and Accessibility 04-06 3.0 Details of approved Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining 06-14 3.1 Date and reference of earlier approved MP/SoM 06 3.2 Details of Modifications if any 07 3.3 Review of earlier approved proposal 07 3.4 Status of compliance of violations pointed out by IBM 14 3.5 Details of suspension / closure / prohibitory ^'dera * 14 3.6 Reason and justification for modificaj^bfi./V 14 PART-A HJf ^ VgJ HO * £ I 1.0 Geology and Exploration: 15-26 V\5? n ' // 2.0 Mining \\ o' < 26-34 X 3.0 Mine Drainage 34-35 4.0 Stacking of Mineral Reject / Sub-grade Material and 35-37 Disposal of Waste. 5.0 Use of Mineral and Mineral Reject 37-38 6.0 Processing of ROM and Mineral Reject 39-40 7.0 Others 40 a) Site Services 40 b) Employment Potential 40 8.0 Progressive Mine Closure Plan 40-59 8.1 Environment Baseline Information 40 8.2 Im pact Assessm ent 46 8.3 Progressive Reclamation Plan 49 8.4 Disaster Management and Risk Assessment 56 8.5 Care and maintenance during temporary discontinuance 57 8.6 Financial Assurance 58 Part - B 9.0 Certificates /Undertakings / Consents 60-62 LIST OF TABLES Table No.
    [Show full text]
  • MA History (CBCS) Course Structure (2020-21Onwards)
    Davangere • University Department of History Shivagangotri, Davangere-07. MA History (CBCS) Course Structure (2020-21onwards) I Marks Title of the Paper HC l.l RESEARCH METHODOLOGY-I 4 70 30 100 4 3 i i HC 1.2 WORLD HISTORY -I 4 ! 70 30 100 1 4 3 ! I ill HC 1.3 ~RINCIPLES AND METHODS OF 4 I 70 30 100 I 4 3 l i ~RCHAELOGY I! I ! ! HC 1.4 !INDIAN HISTORY-I I 4 70 30 100! 4 I 3 I f-i _-+11' -::-::-:=-=--=-----Ei("",F,:.:::ro=m:.:::-:::ea-,:;-rc:.:-lie=:=s::,-tt=:=0~1:...::::2::-,:0-=:-6_:__:A=.D=._.)'=-::-:-._--iic___-:-_-i:----==-=--+---=-=---+---:-:--=---fl____,,---j'_::---i Ii : HC 1.5 HISTORY OF KARNATAKA ! 4 1 70 30 100 I 4 i 3 ! I I(From earliest to 1200 A.D) ! I I I I I Choose anyone of the following 4 70 I SC !.2 I HISTORY OF VIJA YANAGARA 4 70 i i DYNASTY (1336-1646 A.D) i SC~.3 ! ART AND ARCHITECTURE OF 4 70 30 100, 4 I : INDIA I I (from 6th century B.C.E to 6th century +I~C~.E?)~~~·~~_------~-----,-~~+-~-+~~---r~ SC.4 ! STATE IN INDIA 4 4 i 3 I MANDATORY CREDITS: 2 1,1 2 COMMUNICA TION SKILLS . Total Credit for the course 38 630 270 i 900 38 , - . .' .r: Date·· 12.01.2021 ":CCS~~~~-~e:-'ot~ ~r(\ .. ~~=. J ~C:1Qttt.~'" . The R4;'gistnu', ~~lf~-S?;OO.,. '" 1 6 JAN 202J Di...f,avangere\. ...,j,l.. ... ..._ l...-In.l.1"""'.1.versuv...7-'''., ~-f)u'1 \i~'~•.~-,c;o ere....- - -:-';r:rl".r,oa:b Respected SIr -.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Archaeology 1987-88 a Review
    INDIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 1987-88 —A REVIEW EDITED BY M.C.JOSHI Director General Archaeological Survey of India PUBLISHED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA NEW DELHI 1993 Cover : TisseruStupa,Leh,Ladakh Cover layout & design: Raj Nath Kaw 1992 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Price :Rs. 250.00 PRINTED AT BENGAL OFFSET WORKS, 335, KHAJOOR ROAD, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI-1 10005. PHONE: 524200,7510455 PREFACE I am happy to place before the scholars the Indian Archaeology 1987-88—A Review not very long after the publication of the previous issue. We are making efforts to bring the publication of the Review up to date; this, however, would depend on timely submission of material by contributors. It has been our experience that, in many cases, several reminders have to be given for sending material to us for inclusion in the Review which results in delay of its publication. I am sure, with the cooperation of different institutions and the State Departments of Archaeology and Museums and my own colleagues in different Branches and Circles of the Survey it would be possible for us to maintain regularity of its publication. The present issue of the Review is more voluminous than the previous ones and thus reflects also increased activities in different fields of archaeology. Out of several excavations reported in this issue, I may mention the work at Banawali, Thanesar, Sanghol, Hampi, Sannathi, Daulatabad, Lalitagiri, Udaigiri, Fatehpur Sikri, Sravasti, Balikeshwar, Chandel, Harsud, etc. by the Survey, at Kuntasi jointly by the Deccan College, Pune, and the Gujarat State Department of Archaeology, at Mangalkot by the University of Calcutta, at Kotasur by the Visvabharati, Maihar by the Allahabad University, Ganeshwar by the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Rajasthan State and at Shikarpur by the Department of Archaeology, Government of Gujarat.
    [Show full text]