MATCH MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 71 (2014) 511-536 Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry ISSN 0340 - 6253 Stereoisograms of Octahedral Complexes. I. Chirality and RS-Stereogenicity Shinsaku Fujita Shonan Institute of Chemoinformatics and Mathematical Chemistry, Kaneko 479-7 Ooimachi, Ashigara-Kami-Gun, Kanagawa-Ken, 258-0019 Japan E-mail: shinsaku
[email protected] (Received January 9, 2012) Abstract The stereoisogram approach, which has originally been developed to rationalize organic stereochemistry (S. Fujita, J. Org. Chem., 69, 3158–3165 (2004); S. Fujita, Tetrahedron, 62, 691–705 (2006); 65, 1581–1592 (2009)), is extended and applied to inorganic stereo- chemistry by using octahedral complexes as examples. Stereoisograms of octahedral com- plexes are constructed and discussed in terms of attributive terms (chirality/achirality, RS- stereogenicity/RS-astereogenicity, and sclerality/asclerality) or equivalently in terms of re- lational terms (enantiomeric/self-enantiomeric, RS-diastereomeric/self-RS-diastereomeric, and holantimeric/self-holantimeric). After they and categorized into five types (Types I– V), stereoisograms of Type I, III, and V are shown to be characterized by A/C-descriptors, where the capability of giving A/C-descriptors is ascribed to RS-stereogenicity (or RS- diastereomeric relationships), which is determined to be a common nature to Types I, III, and V. Several textbook errors are pointed out and corrected in terms of the stereoiso- gram approach. For example, although the symbols A and C are originally called “chirality symbols” in the IUPAC recommendations 2005 (so-called The Red Book), the naming is inadequate and they should be called “RS-stereogenicity symbols”. 1 Introduction Since the proposal of the coordination theory by Werner [1, 2], the stereochemistry of octahedral complexes has been one of central interests in inorganic stereochemistry, as found in a review [3] -512- and textbooks [4, 5].