Salafism in the Maghreb Politics, Piety, and Militancy Xwx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Salafism in the Maghreb Politics, Piety, and Militancy Xwx Salafism in the Maghreb CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTL PEACE The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace offers decision­ makers global, independent, and strategic insight and innovative ideas that advance international peace. Founded in 1910 as the first inter­ national affairs think tank in the United States, it is a global institu­ tion with centers in Beijing, Beirut, Brussels, Moscow, New Delhi, and Washington. Carnegie’s network works together to provide analysis, shape policy debates, and propose solutions to the most consequential global threats. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace does not take in­ stitutional positions. Its scholars embody a variety of national and regional outlooks as well as the issues that transcend them. All views expressed in its publications are solely those of the author or authors. Salafism in the Maghreb Politics, Piety, and Militancy xwx Frederic Wehrey & Anouar Boukhars 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. © Oxford University Press 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. CIP data is on file at the Library of Congress ISBN 978– 0– 19– 094241– 0 (pbk.) ISBN 978– 0– 19– 094240– 3 (hbk.) 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Paperback printed by Marquis, Canada Hardback printed by Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc., United States of America ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors of the book would like to express their deep thanks to the many people who helped during the research and writing process. First and foremost, we owe much gratitude to the Henry Luce Foundation for its generosity in sponsoring a two-​year project on Salafism in the Maghreb. This is the second instance of the Foundation’s support to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and, as in the past, the experience has been immensely rewarding and stimulating. Toby Volkman, Luce’s Director of Initiatives, has been an enthusiastic advocate, mentor, and constructive critic of our work—and a true pleasure to work with. We are also grateful to the Carnegie Endowment for providing a collegial and independent home for the research and in particular Marwan Muasher and Michele Dunne of the Middle East program for their unwavering commitment to deeply researched and people-​centered work on the region. Within the Middle East program, we were fortunate to harness the talents of several capable colleagues: junior fellows Katherine Pollock and Anmar Jerjees provided indispensable research assistance, while Blair Scott kept a firm hand on the tiller of day­ to-​day affairs. We spent much time in the field delving into the social and political con­ text of Salafism, and we could not have carried out this exploration without the countless individuals in the Maghreb who facilitated our travel, brokered meetings, protected us, and spoke to us candidly— sometimes at great risk to themselves. For their safety, many must remain anonymous. Those we can mention include Professor Mohamedou Meyine, whose tireless efforts, hospitality, and warmth made Fred Wehrey’s research truly memorable. In addition, the entire staff of the Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches sur l’Ouest Saharien (CEROS) providing a welcoming research home. Both of us are indebted to the scholars and analysts who have shaped our thinking on Salafism and the Maghreb, some of whom gathered together for an incredibly rich and stimulating discussion on Maghrebi Salafism, in the congenial setting of seaside Tunis in the winter of 2018. We wish in par­ ticular to thank the following for their penetrating critiques of our chapter drafts: Alex Thurston, Francesco Cavatorta, Stéphane Lacroix, Hicham ( vii ) ( viii ) Acknowledgments Houdaifa, Mohamed Masbah, Dalia Ghanem Yazbeck, Mohammed M. Hafez, Joas Wagemakers, Amel Boubekeur, Raphael Lefevre, Yezid Sayigh, Geoffrey Howard, Jalel Harchaoui, and Ibrahim Yahaya Ibrahim. At Carnegie, a lunchtime discussion with colleagues— many of them non– Middle East specialists in the fields of democratization, governance, and security— helped us reframe our analysis through a comparative lens. We thank Carnegie’s senior vice president Tom Carothers for facilitating this exchange. At Oxford University Press, we extend our thanks to our editor, David McBride, for his interest and enthusiasm for the project and to the Press’s stellar team of production editors and marketing professionals. Lastly, we are both blessed with supportive partners who indulged our absences in the field and frequent preoccupations and, most importantly, have made the journey all the more worthwhile. Anouar Boukhars sends his gratitude to Naima Hachad, and Fred Wehrey his appreciation to Nakisa Karimian. Introduction itting at the nexus of three continents, the Maghreb region of North Africa (comprising the Arab states of Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, STunisia, and Libya) has, for centuries, been a hub of rich political, eco­ nomic, and cultural exchange, especially around the Mediterranean basin. But in the last century, the Maghreb has been a minor player on the world stage. Its influence was barely felt during the Cold War, with the exception of the Algerian War of Independence and, perhaps, the international bel­ ligerency of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. It remained mostly on the margins of the Arab world’s central dramas like the Arab-​Israeli conflict, the Arab rivalry with Iran, the post­ 9/ 11 US­ led “war on terror,” and the Iraq War. Its main conflicts over the past decades, the Western Sahara dispute and the bloody Algerian civil war during the 1990s, seemed to have mostly escaped attention from the West, and even the world. Yet in late 2010 and early 2011 all that changed. The self­ immolation of a Tunisian fruit seller triggered protests that toppled the Tunisian regime and spread far across the Arab world. In the Maghreb, the aftershocks of that electrifying episode were felt most strongly in Libya, which saw the overthrow of Gaddafi in October 2011 after an eight-​month revolution backed by NATO­ led forces. Though initially marked by optimism and successful elections, Libya quickly fragmented into civil war by 2014. The resulting vacuum collapsed the boundaries, which were always more per­ meable than many had assumed, between the Maghreb, the Sahel, and the Mediterranean.1 Libyan arms and Tuareg fighters destabilized Mali, pro­ voking French intervention. Libya also became the deadliest thoroughfare for the world’s most catastrophic crisis of human migration, with thousands perishing along a central Mediterranean route that started from its shores. Salafism in the Maghreb. Frederic Wehrey and Anouar Boukhars, Oxford University Press (2019). © Oxford University Press DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190942403.001.0001 ( 2 ) Introduction It earned the dubious distinction of hosting the Islamic State’s most pow­ erful branch outside of Syria and Iraq. Meanwhile, the Maghreb as a whole accounted for the largest per capita percentage of foreign fighters traveling to fight for the terrorist group in Iraq and Syria, often from peripheral ­re gions where unemployment and underemployment was high, especially in Tunisia and Libya.2 These are the issues that have grabbed the attention of the media and policymakers. But the Maghreb is being transformed in many other signif­ icant and sometimes understudied ways. By raising the demands of its in­ creasingly youthful population, the Arab Spring opened up new forms of contestation.3 Tunisia still remains the most hopeful prospect for democ­ racy, yet its future has been dimmed by corruption and authoritarian back­ sliding. The Moroccan and Mauritanian governments emerged unscathed from the Arab revolts yet remain authoritarian, despite some cosmetic and preemptive reforms. Algeria, too, seemed to bypass the 2011 upheavals, but the 2019 protests against entrenched corruption and President Abdelaziz Bouteflika’s fifth presidential term show that there are limits to how long authoritarians can contain public frustration.4 Every country in the Maghreb is facing varying levels of unemployment, economic slowdown, and mounting disenchantment among its citizens, especially those on its rural and urban peripheries. One result of this upheaval has been the spread of a literalist, revivalist form of Islam known as Salafism. This has taken many forms: Salafi political parties like Hizb al-​Nour in Egypt or Islah in Tunisia; militant, antidemo­ cratic groups like Ansar al-​Sharia in Tunisia and Libya, and proregime loy­ alist Salafis, to name but a few. This growing political profile also reflects the Salafis’ spread in Maghreb society. There is little conclusive, quantitative data about the spread of Salafism, but some polling suggests a general de­ cline in popular support for the region’s traditionalist forms of Islam, Maliki jurisprudence and Sufism, despite being promoted by local governments.5 Seizing on this disenchantment and buoyed by Gulf funding, Salafis are growing in influence. In many cases, they exploit their more adroit use of in­ formation technology to outmaneuver traditionalist imams while, in other cases, they benefit from patronage by Maghreb regimes themselves.6 In the case of Libya, Salafis are using militias to coerce and intimidate.7 But these “push” factors are only half the story.
Recommended publications
  • Mapping Threats to Peace and Democracy Worldwide
    ISSN: 2600-3457 Mapping threats to peace and democracy worldwide Normandy Index 2021 STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Members' Research Service PE 690.670 – July 2021 EN Mapping threats to peace and democracy worldwide Normandy Index 2021 The 'Normandy Index', now in its third year, aims to measure the level of threats to peace, security and democracy around the world. It was presented for the first time on the occasion of the Normandy Peace Forum in June 2019, as a result of a partnership between the European Parliament and the Region of Normandy. The Index has been designed and prepared by the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), in conjunction with and on the basis of data provided by the Institute for Economics and Peace. This paper sets out the findings of the 2021 exercise and explains how the Index can be used to compare peace – defined on the basis of a given country's performance against a range of predetermined threats – across countries and regions. It is complemented by 51 individual country case studies, derived from the Index. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHORS Editor: Étienne Bassot Authors: Elena Lazarou and Branislav Stanicek, Members' Research Service Graphics by Nadejda Kresnichka-Nikolchova and Giulio Sabbati This paper has been drawn up by the Members' Research Service, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. The underlying data have been supplied by the Institute for Economics and Peace. Naja Bentzen, Enrico D'Ambrogio, Enrique Gómez Ramírez, Gisela Grieger, Issam Hallak, Beatrix Immenkamp, Tania Latici, Philippe Perchoc, Eric Pichon, Jakub Przetacznik, Martin Russell and Ionel Zamfir drafted case studies in this edition of the Normandy Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State
    Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State By Neil Grant Landers A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in French in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Debarati Sanyal, Co-Chair Professor Soraya Tlatli, Co-Chair Professor Karl Britto Professor Stefania Pandolfo Fall 2013 1 Abstract of the Dissertation Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State by Neil Grant Landers Doctor of Philosophy in French Literature University of California, Berkeley Professor Debarati Sanyal, Co-Chair Professor Soraya Tlatli, Co-Chair Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State addresses the way the Algerian civil war has been portrayed in 1990s novelistic literature. In the words of one literary critic, "The Algerian war has been, in a sense, one big murder mystery."1 This may be true, but literary accounts portray the "mystery" of the civil war—and propose to solve it—in sharply divergent ways. The primary aim of this study is to examine how three of the most celebrated 1990s novels depict—organize, analyze, interpret, and "solve"—the civil war. I analyze and interpret these novels—by Assia Djebar, Yasmina Khadra, and Boualem Sansal—through a deep contextualization, both in terms of Algerian history and in the novels' contemporary setting. This is particularly important in this case, since the civil war is so contested, and is poorly understood. Using the novels' thematic content as a cue for deeper understanding, I engage through them and with them a number of elements crucial to understanding the civil war: Algeria's troubled nationalist legacy; its stagnant one-party regime; a fear, distrust, and poor understanding of the Islamist movement and the insurgency that erupted in 1992; and the unending, horrifically bloody violence that piled on throughout the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of the Democratic Process in Legal Politics in Indonesia and Egypt
    JURNAL CITA HUKUM (Indonesian Law Journal) FSH UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020), pp. 627-654, DOI: 10.15408/jch.v8i3.17071 The Dynamics of The Democratic Process In Legal Politics In Indonesia and Egypt Nahrowi1, Masyrofah2, Nurul Handayani3 Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta Indonesia 10.15408/jch.v8i3.17071 Abstract The implementation of democratic systems in several Muslim countries has obstacles. This is due to the development of people's thinking patterns about understanding democracy itself. Islam as a religion emphasizes the establishment of harmonious relations, but when applying the relationship of Islam and democracy in the life of the state does not necessarily be smooth at the level of practice. But on the other hand, It faced with the reality of the problems in implementing democratization in the Islamic world. Some countries claimed to succeed as democratic countries, generally after going through a transition period of transfer of government power. But on the contrary, not a few countries that have not or are not ready to accept change as a process of democratization are trapped in the struggle for power and lead to conflict and violence. Therefore it is important to discuss the challenges and obstacles of democratization in the Islamic world. With a normative-empirical approach, this article aims to analyze the problems of the democratization process in two Muslim countries, namely Indonesia and Egypt. This study found that the process of democratization as a part of the legal-political system in Muslim countries must adapt to the culture and political conditions of each country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 Human Rights Report - Algeria Page 1 of 11
    1997 Human Rights Report - Algeria Page 1 of 11 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Algeria Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1997 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, January 30, 1998. ALGERIA President Liamine Zeroual, a former general, was elected in November 1995 to a 5-year term. Zeroual had previously served as president of a transition government established by the army in 1994, which included a National transition Council (CNT) as a surrogate parliament. The President controls defense and foreign policy, appoints and dismisses the Prime Minister and cabinet ministers, and may dissolve the legislature. The presidential election was competitive. Three opposition candidates had some access to state-controlled television and radio and also received heavy coverage in the independent press. According to government figures, Zeroual received 61 percent of the votes; losing candidates claimed that there were instances of fraud but did not contest Zeroual's victory. The Government does not always respect the independence of the judiciary. After gaining independence in 1962, Algeria had a single-party state dominated by the country's military leadership and supported by the bureaucracy and the National Liberation Front (FLN). Under the 1989 Constitution, there was to be a transition to a pluralist republic with a strong president.
    [Show full text]
  • Looters Vs. Traitors: the Muqawama (“Resistance”) Narrative, and Its Detractors, in Contemporary Mauritania Elemine Ould Mohamed Baba and Francisco Freire
    Looters vs. Traitors: The Muqawama (“Resistance”) Narrative, and its Detractors, in Contemporary Mauritania Elemine Ould Mohamed Baba and Francisco Freire Abstract: Since 2012, when broadcasting licenses were granted to various private television and radio stations in Mauritania, the controversy around the Battle of Um Tounsi (and Mauritania’s colonial past more generally) has grown substantially. One of the results of this unprecedented level of media freedom has been the prop- agation of views defending the Mauritanian resistance (muqawama in Arabic) to French colonization. On the one hand, verbal and written accounts have emerged which paint certain groups and actors as French colonial power sympathizers. At the same time, various online publications have responded by seriously questioning the very existence of a structured resistance to colonization. This article, drawing pre- dominantly on local sources, highlights the importance of this controversy in study- ing the western Saharan region social model and its contemporary uses. African Studies Review, Volume 63, Number 2 (June 2020), pp. 258– 280 Elemine Ould Mohamed Baba is Professor of History and Sociolinguistics at the University of Nouakchott, Mauritania (Ph.D. University of Provence (Aix- Marseille I); Fulbright Scholar resident at Northwestern University 2012–2013), and a Senior Research Consultant at the CAPSAHARA project (ERC-2016- StG-716467). E-mail: [email protected] Francisco Freire is an Anthropologist (Ph.D. Universidade Nova de Lisboa 2009) at CRIA–NOVA FCSH (Lisbon, Portugal). He is the Principal Investigator of the European Research Council funded project CAPSAHARA: Critical Approaches to Politics, Social Activism and Islamic Militancy in the Western Saharan Region (ERC-2016-StG-716467).
    [Show full text]
  • The Algerian Armed Forces: National and International Challenges
    THE ALGERIAN ARMED FORCES: NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGES Carlos Echeverría Jesús Working Paper (WP) Nº 8/2004 1/4/2004 Area: Mediterranean & Arab World / Defence & Security – WP Nº 8/2004 (Trans. Spanish) 1/4/2004 The Algerian Armed Forces: National and international challenges ∗ Carlos Echeverría Jesús THE ROLE OF THE ARMED FORCES: FROM INDEPENDENCE TO THE FIRST STEPS TOWARD DEMOCRACY (1962-1988) The Algerian Armed Forces arose from the National Liberation Army (ALN), particularly from the so-called ‘border army’ which, as General Jaled Nezzar recalls in his Memoirs, began to play a dominant role under the command of Colonel Houari Boumedienne in late 1959: this army relentlessly waged war on the French forces deployed on the borders of Morocco and Tunisia until the conflict ended in 1962 (1). Although the creation of the ALN itself dates back to 1954, it was not until the Summam Congress, on August 20, 1956, that its structure was determined and it became considered an instrument for implementing the policies developed by the party: the National Liberation Front (FLN). The internal struggles within the FLN-ALN tandem, both in and outside Algeria, have been described by many authors: both the confrontations within the National Council of the Algerian Revolution (CNRA) and those at the various FLN congresses during and immediately after the war –the Summam Congress (1956), Tripoli Congress (1962) and Algiers Congress (1964)– aimed at taking control of the embryo of the future Armed Forces. According to Mohamed Harbi, the session of the CNRA held in December 1959 – January 1960 was crucial, as it abolished the Ministry of the Armed Forces, replacing it with an Inter-Ministerial War Committee (CIG), directed by military officers of a General Chiefs of Staff (EMG) led by Boumedienne, who went on to become Defense Minister of the first independent government and, starting in June 1965, President until his death in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Quarterly Monitoring Report for the EUTF
    EUTF Monitoring and Learning System Sahel and Lake Chad Q3 2019 REPORT COVERING UNTIL 30 SEPTEMBER 2019 Altai Consulting for the European Union – January 2020 © European Union January 2020 Unless specified otherwise, all pictures in this report are credited to Altai Consulting. Cover photo: Agadez, Old town, Niger. ALTAI CONSULTING Altai Consulting provides strategy consulting and research services to private companies, governments and public institutions in developing countries. Altai teams operate in more than 50 countries in Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia. Since its inception 15 years ago, Altai Consulting has developed a strong focus on governance and civil society related research and programme evaluations. Contact Details: Philibert de Mercey (Project Director): [email protected] Eric Davin (Altai Partner): [email protected] www.altaiconsulting.com ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was prepared by Eric Davin, Justine Rubira, Philibert de Mercey, Jacopo Patrini, Paola Hartpence, Garance Dauchy and Héloïse Voisin (Altai Consulting). We gratefully thank project staff from the implementing partners who took the time to sit with us and comply with our reporting requirements. We are in particular indebted to: ACF, AICS, Diakonia, Expertise France, GIZ, Humanité & Inclusion, IOM, LVIA, OXFAM, and Terre des Hommes in Burkina Faso; ACF, AFD, GIZ, IOM and SNV in Cameroon; ITC, IOM, GIZ, Enabel, IMVF in The Gambia; ITC, GIZ, Enabel, UNDP, UNCDF in Guinea, COGINTA, GIZ and OXFAM in Chad; AECID, Expertise France, Humanité & Inclusion, IOM, LVIA, LuxDev, SNV World and SOS SAHEL in Mali; Expertise France, ILO, IOM and Save the Children in Mauritania; ACTED, AFD, CISP, Civipol, FIIAPP, GIZ, HACP, IOM, Karkara, LuxDev and UNHCR in Niger; British Council, FAO, IOM, DRC, NRC, IRC, Mercy Corps, UNICEF, UNW and WFP in Nigeria; 20STM, AECID, ACTED, AFD, Civipol, Enabel, GRET, IOM, LuxDev and PPI in Senegal; and Civipol, EU-DGEAC, FIIAPP, Interpol, ITC, IOM, and UNHCR at the regional level.
    [Show full text]
  • Djerbal Yasmine S 201401 MA.Pdf (1.085Mb)
    WOMEN’S CITIZENSHIP: BETWEEN BLOODLINES AND PATRIARCHAL CONDITIONING IN POSTCOLONIAL ALGERIA by Yasmine S. Djerbal A thesis submitted to the Department of Gender Studies In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (January, 2014) Copyright ©Yasmine S. Djerbal, 2014 Abstract My thesis maps a genealogy of patriarchal structures that underpin Algerian history, culture, and institutions between the war of independence and the 1991-2001 civil war. More specifically, I contextualize the ways in which patriarchal lineages and origin stories—and thus the symbolic and structural promises of the family—underpin political struggle. In mapping these symbolic lineages found at work in the promise of independence, and the ways in which they underpin political struggle, I demonstrate how the war of independence reified and redefined familial and patriarchal kinships within political and social structures. I suggest that historical and social conditionings found at work at these different historical moments have legitimated, to a certain extent, the domination over women and a normalization of violence against them. My thesis examines social and political discourses at four central moments in Algerian history. Firstly, in the constructions of the Algerian nation-state post independence in 1962; secondly, in the Islamic Renaissance of the 1980s and the creation of the Family Code; and in a third moment, I draw connections between the Family Code, violent political clashes of 1990s and the civil war that ensued. Finally, I analyze laws and discourses created after the civil war and the resistance movements that have continuously contested power and oppression throughout these different periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan Abdel Fattah El-Sisi Abdelmadjid Tebboune
    Abdel Fattah al-Burhan Hage Geingob Mukhammedkalyi Abylgaziev Abdel Fattah el-Sisi Haitham bin Tariq Nana Akufo-Addo Abdelmadjid Tebboune Hassan Ali Khayre Narendra Modi Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi Hassan Diab Nayib Bukele Abdullah II Hassanal Bolkiah Nguyen Phú Trong Abiy Ahmed Hereditary Prince Alois Nicolás Maduro Adama Barrow Hubert Minnis Nicos Anastasiades Adil Abdul-Mahdi Hun Sen Nikol Pashinyan Alassane Ouattara Ibrahim Boubacar Keïta Oliver Spasovski Alberto Fernández Ibrahim Mohamed Solih Patrice Talon Alejandro Giammattei Idriss Déby Paul Biya Alessandro Mancini Igor Matovič Paul Kagame Alexander Lukashenko Ilham Aliyev Pedro Sánchez Ali Bongo Ondimba Imran Khan Peter Mutharika Ali Khamenei Ion Chicu Pierre Nkurunziza Allen Chastanet Isaias Afwerki Pope Francis Alpha Condé Ismaïl Omar Guelleh Pravind Jugnauth Ana Brnabić Iván Duque Prayut Chan-o-cha Andrej Babiš Jacinda Ardern Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa Andrej Plenković Jair Bolsonaro Qasym-Zhomart Toqaev Andrew Holness James Marape Ralph Gonsalves Andry Rajoelina Janez Janša Raúl Castro Andrés Manuel López Obrador Jeanine Áñez Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Angela Merkel John Magufuli Robert Abela António Costa Joko Widodo Roch Marc Christian Kaboré Ashraf Ghani Jorge Carlos Fonseca Rodrigo Duterte Azali Assoumani Jovenel Moïse Roosevelt Skerrit Bashar al-Assad João Lourenço Salman Benjamin Netanyahu Juan Orlando Hernández Salva Kiir Mayardit Boris Johnson Julius Maada Bio Sanna Marin Bounnhang Vorachith Justin Trudeau Scott Morrison Boyko Borisov Jüri Ratas Sebastian Kurz Carlos Alvarado Quesada KP Sharma Oli Sebastián Piñera Charlot Salwai Katrín Jakobsdóttir Serge Telle Cyril Ramaphosa Kausea Natano Shavkat Mirziyoyev Daniel Ortega Kaïs Saïed Sheikh Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa Danilo Medina Keith Mitchell Sheikh Hasina Danny Faure Keith Rowley Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Islam in Algeria
    Political Islam in Algeria CEPS Working Document No. 268/May 2007 Amel Boubekeur Abstract The recent legislative elections of May 2007 in Algeria have shown how complex the evolution of Islamist parties is in this country and how crucial an understanding of these mechanisms has become for Europe. Since the civil war of the 1990s, Islamist parties have experienced increased political participation. Drawing on interviews with various Algerian Islamist actors, this paper analyses how Islamist parties are building a new relationship with democratic mechanisms in Europe. In light of these recent changes, a reconsideration of EU democracy promotion policies is now necessary. CEPS Working Documents are intended to give an indication of work being conducted within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the author in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which she is associated. ISBN-13: 978-92-9079-721-0 Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.eu) © Boubekeur, 2007 Contents The Evolution of the MSP and the MNR...................................................................................... 1 Activities with European Muslims................................................................................................5 The Failure of Europe as a Democratic Model ............................................................................. 7 Areas of Potential Collaboration with
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 24 December 2020
    United Nations S/2020/1293 Security Council Distr.: General 24 December 2020 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the activities of the United Nations Office for West Africa and the Sahel I. Introduction 1. The present report covers the period from 23 June to 14 December 2020 and provides an overview of developments and trends in West Africa and the Sahel. It captures the activities of the United Nations Office for West Africa and the Sahel (UNOWAS) and highlights progress made in the implementation of the United Nations integrated strategy for the Sahel. In addition, it provides an update on the situation in the Lake Chad basin, pursuant to Security Council resolution 2349 (2017). II. Developments and trends in West Africa and the Sahel 2. Since the previous report (S/2020/585), citizen demands for inclusive participation in political processes and for effective and accountable governance have intensified across West Africa and the Sahel. Constitutional reforms are ongoing, despite challenges, in the Gambia and Guinea-Bissau. Terrorist activities have increasingly become intertwined with intercommunity and farmer-herder conflict, compounding a precarious security situation and acute humanitarian needs in large parts of the Sahel. While Governments in the subregion responded effectively to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, the pandemic has triggered a severe economic slowdown, which, along with climatic conditions, has exacerbated the already dire humanitarian situation. 3. Elections were held in Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia and the Niger. To varying degrees, tensions arose over the inclusivity of electoral processes, electoral management bodies and the accuracy of voter registers, among other contentious issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and the Eruption of the Algerian Civil War: a Context-Sensitive Analysis of the Ambivalent Impact of Resource Abundance
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Shabafrouz, Miriam Working Paper Oil and the Eruption of the Algerian Civil War: A Context-sensitive Analysis of the Ambivalent Impact of Resource Abundance GIGA Working Papers, No. 118 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Shabafrouz, Miriam (2010) : Oil and the Eruption of the Algerian Civil War: A Context-sensitive Analysis of the Ambivalent Impact of Resource Abundance, GIGA Working Papers, No. 118, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47754 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten
    [Show full text]