A417 Missing Link Preliminary Environmental Information Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In 1968. the Report Consists of the Following Parts: L the Northgate Turnpike Roads 2 Early Administration and the Turnpike Trust
Reprinted from: Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 1971 pages 1-58 [This edition was reprinted in 1987 by the Author in Hong Kong with corrections and revised pagination] THE NQRIH§AIE.IHBNBlKE N SPRY For more than one hundred and seventy years the road from the city of Gloucester to the top of Birdlip Hill, and the road which branched eastwards from it up Crickley Hill towards Oxford and later London, was maintained from the proceeds of the various turnpikes or toll gates along it. This report examines the history and administration of these roads from their earliest period to the demise of the Turnpike Trust in l87l and also details excavations across the road at Wotton undertaken in 1968. The report consists of the following Parts: l The Northgate Turnpike roads 2 Early administration and the Turnpike Trust 3 Tolls, exemptions and traffic 4 Road materials 5 Excavations at Wotton 1968 I Summary II The Excavations III Discussion References 1 IHE.NQBIH§AIE.BQADfi The road to Gloucester from Cirencester and the east is a section of the Roman road known as Ermine Street. The line of this road from Brockworth to Wotton has been considered to indicate a Severn crossing at Kingsholm one Km north of Gloucester, where, as late as the seventeenth century, a major branch of the river flowed slightly west of modern Kingsholm. The extent of early Roman archaeological material from Kingsholm makes it likely to have been a military site early in the Roman period. (l) Between Wotton Hill and Kingsholm this presumed line is lost; the road possibly passed through the grounds of Hillfield House and along the ridge, now marked by Denmark Road, towards the river. -
Painswick to Winchcombe Cycle Route
Great Comberton A4184 Elmley Castle B4035 Netherton B4632 B4081 Hinton on the Green Kersoe A38 CHIPPING CAMPDEN A46(T) Aston Somerville Uckinghall Broadway Ashton under Hill Kemerton A438 (T) M50 B4081 Wormington B4479 Laverton B4080 Beckford Blockley Ashchurch B4078 for Tewkesbury Bushley B4079 Great Washbourne Stanton A38 A38 Key to Map A417 TEWKESBURY A438 Alderton Snowshill Day A438 Bourton-on-the-Hill Symbols: B4079 A44 At a Glance M5 Teddington B4632 4 Stanway M50 B4208 Dymock Painswick to WinchcombeA424 Linkend Oxenton Didbrook A435 PH A hilly route from start to A Road Dixton Gretton Cutsdean Hailes B Road Kempley Deerhurst PH finish taking you through the Corse Ford 6 At fork TL SP BRIMPSFIELD. B4213 B4211 B4213 PH Gotherington Minor Road Tredington WINCHCOMBE Farmcote rolling Cotswold hills and Tirley PH 7 At T junctionB4077 TL SP BIRDLIP/CHELTENHAM. Botloe’s Green Apperley 6 7 8 9 10 Condicote Motorway Bishop’s Cleeve PH Several capturing the essence of Temple8 GuitingTR SP CIRENCESTER. Hardwicke 22 Lower Apperley Built-up Area Upleadon Haseld Coombe Hill the Cotswold countryside. Kineton9 Speed aware – Steep descent on narrow B4221 River Severn Orchard Nook PH Roundabouts A417 Gorsley A417 21 lane. Beware of oncoming traffic. The route follows mainly Newent A436 Kilcot A4091 Southam Barton Hartpury Ashleworth Boddington 10 At T junction TL. Lower Swell quiet lanes, and has some Railway Stations B4224 PH Guiting Power PH Charlton Abbots PH11 Cross over A 435 road SP UPPER COBERLEY. strenuous climbs and steep B4216 Prestbury Railway Lines Highleadon Extreme Care crossing A435. Aston Crews Staverton Hawling PH Upper Slaughter descents. -
Gloucestershire Parish Map
Gloucestershire Parish Map MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT 1 Charlton Kings CP Cheltenham 91 Sevenhampton CP Cotswold 181 Frocester CP Stroud 2 Leckhampton CP Cheltenham 92 Sezincote CP Cotswold 182 Ham and Stone CP Stroud 3 Prestbury CP Cheltenham 93 Sherborne CP Cotswold 183 Hamfallow CP Stroud 4 Swindon CP Cheltenham 94 Shipton CP Cotswold 184 Hardwicke CP Stroud 5 Up Hatherley CP Cheltenham 95 Shipton Moyne CP Cotswold 185 Harescombe CP Stroud 6 Adlestrop CP Cotswold 96 Siddington CP Cotswold 186 Haresfield CP Stroud 7 Aldsworth CP Cotswold 97 Somerford Keynes CP Cotswold 187 Hillesley and Tresham CP Stroud 112 75 8 Ampney Crucis CP Cotswold 98 South Cerney CP Cotswold 188 Hinton CP Stroud 9 Ampney St. Mary CP Cotswold 99 Southrop CP Cotswold 189 Horsley CP Stroud 10 Ampney St. Peter CP Cotswold 100 Stow-on-the-Wold CP Cotswold 190 King's Stanley CP Stroud 13 11 Andoversford CP Cotswold 101 Swell CP Cotswold 191 Kingswood CP Stroud 12 Ashley CP Cotswold 102 Syde CP Cotswold 192 Leonard Stanley CP Stroud 13 Aston Subedge CP Cotswold 103 Temple Guiting CP Cotswold 193 Longney and Epney CP Stroud 89 111 53 14 Avening CP Cotswold 104 Tetbury CP Cotswold 194 Minchinhampton CP Stroud 116 15 Bagendon CP Cotswold 105 Tetbury Upton CP Cotswold 195 Miserden CP Stroud 16 Barnsley CP Cotswold 106 Todenham CP Cotswold 196 Moreton Valence CP Stroud 17 Barrington CP Cotswold 107 Turkdean CP Cotswold 197 Nailsworth CP Stroud 31 18 Batsford CP Cotswold 108 Upper Rissington CP Cotswold 198 North Nibley CP Stroud 19 Baunton -
Brian Knight
STRATEGY, MISSION AND PEOPLE IN A RURAL DIOCESE A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE DIOCESE OF GLOUCESTER 1863-1923 BRIAN KNIGHT A thesis submitted to the University of Gloucestershire in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Humanities August, 2002 11 Strategy, Mission and People in a Rural Diocese A critical examination of the Diocese of Gloucester 1863-1923 Abstract A study of the relationship between the people of Gloucestershire and the Church of England diocese of Gloucester under two bishops, Charles John Ellicott and Edgar Charles Sumner Gibson who presided over a mainly rural diocese, predominantly of small parishes with populations under 2,000. Drawing largely on reports and statistics from individual parishes, the study recalls an era in which the class structure was a dominant factor. The framework of the diocese, with its small villages, many of them presided over by a squire, helped to perpetuate a quasi-feudal system which made sharp distinctions between leaders and led. It is shown how for most of this period Church leaders deliberately chose to ally themselves with the power and influence of the wealthy and cultured levels of society and ostensibly to further their interests. The consequence was that they failed to understand and alienated a large proportion of the lower orders, who were effectively excluded from any involvement in the Church's affairs. Both bishops over-estimated the influence of the Church on the general population but with the twentieth century came the realisation that the working man and women of all classes had qualities which could be adapted to the Church's service and a wider lay involvement was strongly encouraged. -
Draft Benefice Profile 12 with Finance
THE GREENWAY BENEFICE in the Severn Vale Deanery, Diocese of Gloucester: The parishes of Holy Trinity, Badgeworth St. Paul’s St . Mary the Virgin, Shurdington Witcombe with Bentham Our Benefice Profile January 2017 MAP SHOWING THE THREE CHURCHES Our Vacancy Prayer Heavenly Father, during this time we pray for a new vicar who is a person of prayer inspired by the Holy Spirit with a prophetic vision for God’s mission of our benefice churches. We welcome a priest unknown to us, whose pastoral heart will kindle God’s loving kind- ness amongst us, beyond us, and through us, as we reach out to those in need. We welcome a priest known to God, praying that the light of God’s love may grow in the hearts of the congregation and that its warmth may be felt in our communities transforming lives as the gospel of Christ breaks new boundaries. So we pray for our new vicar to be called to our churches and local communities, to be stirred by God during this time as we wait with patience and excitement. Through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. 2 CONTENTS Map of the Benefice …….…………………… page 2 Our Vacancy Prayer ….……………………… page 2 Where we are and Our Vision …….………… page 5 Present development Plan ………………….. page 7 Benefice Structure ……….…….…………….. page 8 Present Pattern of Worship ……….………… page 9 Benefice-wide groups & organisations …….. page 10 Working with Children ….……….…….…….. page 12 The Parishes Badgeworth …………………….…………….. page 14 Shurdington ….………………….……………. page 16 Witcombe with Bentham ….…….….….……. page 18 The Vicarage ………….……….……….…….. page 20 The Area ….…….….….….….….….………… page 20 Website Links …….….….….…….….………. page 20 Appendix 1 - Person Specification…….….… page 21 Appendix 2 - Annual Report Finance………. -
Archaeological Review No. 25 by J
From the Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society Archaeological Review No. 25 by J. Wills (ed.) 2001, Vol. 119, 185-210 © The Society and the Author(s) Trans. Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 119 (2001), 185–210 Archaeological Review No. 25 2000 Edited by JAN WILLS The Archaeological Review presents brief summaries of archaeological research and fieldwork undertaken during the year. Information is arranged mostly by civil parishes (as shown on the O.S. 1:10,000 series maps) with the parish name followed by the site name or description and grid reference. For the cities of Bristol and Gloucester entries are arranged by street or area. Contributions for the next review should be sent to the Archaeology Service, Gloucestershire County Council, Shire Hall, Gloucester, GL1 2TH. Abbreviations AAU Avon Archaeological Unit AR Archaeological Review BaRAS Bristol and Region Archaeological Services CAT Cotswold Archaeological Trust DAG Dean Archaeological Group FA Foundations Archaeology GAU Gloucester Archaeology Unit GCCAS Gloucestershire County Council Archaeology Service MA Marches Archaeology MoLAS Museum of London Archaeology Service NT National Trust OAU Oxford Archaeological Unit TVAS Thames Valley Archaeological Services ALMONDSBURY, Bristol Golf Club, ST 585816. A watching brief was carried out on the reconstruction of St. Swithin’s farmhouse and the construction of a golf course. The area had been previously identified as the site of a medieval chapel and moated farmhouse. The moat was identified: it had been filled with domestic rubbish within the last 150 years and badly damaged by successive construction work. J.G.P. Erskine, AAU Hollywood Tower, ST 57508150. A desk-based assessment of the Hollywood Tower estate, which includes an early 19th-century mansion and 54 ha of parkland, woods and agricultural land, identified three archaeo- logical sites. -
The Role and Effectiveness of Parish Councils in Gloucestershire
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Worcester Research and Publications The Role and Effectiveness of Parish Councils in Gloucestershire: Adapting to New Modes of Rural Community Governance Nicholas John Bennett Coventry University and University of Worcester April 2006 Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 ABSTRACT 9 1 INTRODUCTION – Research Context, Research Aims, 11 Thesis Structure 2 LITERATURE REVIEW I: RURAL GOVERNANCE 17 Section 2.1: Definition & Chronology 17 Section 2.2 : Theories of Rural Governance 27 3 LITERATURE REVIEW II: RURAL GOVERNANCE 37 Section 3.1: The Role & Nature of Partnerships 37 Section 3.2 : Exploring the Rural White Paper 45 Section 3.3 : The Future Discourse for Rural Governance 58 Research 4 PARISH COUNCILS IN ENGLAND/INTRODUCTION TO 68 STUDY REGION 5 METHODOLOGY 93 6 COMPOSITION & VIBRANCY OF PARISH COUNCILS 106 IN GLOUCESTERSHIRE 7 ISSUES & PRIORITIES FOR PARISH COUNCILS 120 8 PARISH COUNCILS - ROLES, NEEDS & CONFLICTS 138 9 CONCLUSIONS 169 BIBLIOGRAPHY 190 ANNEXES 1 Copy of Parish Council Postal Questionnaire 200 2 Parish Council Clerk Interview Sheet & Observation Data 210 Capture Sheet 3 Listing of 262 Parish Councils in the administrative 214 county of Gloucestershire surveyed (Bolded parishes indicate those who responded to survey) 4 Sample population used for Pilot Exercise 217 5 Listing of 10 Selected Case Study Parish Councils for 218 further observation, parish clerk interviews & attendance at Parish Council Meetings 4 LIST OF MAPS, TABLES & FIGURES MAPS TITLE PAGE NO. -
Map 8 Britannia Superior Compiled by A.S
Map 8 Britannia Superior Compiled by A.S. Esmonde-Cleary, 1996 with the assistance of R. Warner (Ireland) Introduction Britain has a long tradition of antiquarian and archaeological investigation and recording of its Roman past, reaching back to figures such as Leland in the sixteenth century. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the classically-educated aristocracy and gentry of a major imperial and military power naturally felt an affinity with the evidence for Rome’s presence in Britain. In the twentieth century, the development of archaeology as a discipline in its own right reinforced this interest in the Roman period, resulting in intense survey and excavation on Roman sites and commensurate work on artifacts and other remains. The cartographer is therefore spoiled for choice, and must determine the objectives of a map with care so as to know what to include and what to omit, and on what grounds. British archaeology already has a long tradition of systematization, sometimes based on regions as in the work of the Royal Commissions on (Ancient and) Historic Monuments for England (Scotland and Wales), but also on types of site or monument. Consequently, there are available compendia by Rivet (1979) on the ancient evidence for geography and toponymy; Wacher (1995) on the major towns; Burnham (1990) on the “small towns”; Margary (1973) on the roads that linked them; and Scott (1993) on villas. These works give a series of internally consistent catalogs of the major types of site. Maps of Roman Britain conventionally show the island with its modern coastline, but it is clear that there have been extensive changes since antiquity, and that the conventional approach risks understating the differences between the ancient and the modern. -
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.5Lj7
Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.5lJ7 Principal Area Boundary Review ELECTORAL CONSEQUENT! ALS: CITY OF GLOUCESTER BOROUGH OF CHELTENHAM •DISTRICT OFCOTSWOLC •DISTRICT OF STROUI3 I30ROUGH OF TEWKESBURY LOCAL GOVEHNUEST BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOII HUG LAND REPORT NO 5U7 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN MR G J ELLERTON, CMG, MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN MEMBERS MR K F J ENNALS, CB MR G R P'RENTICE MRS H R V SARKANY MR C- W- SMITH ^ _ . ^.. _ PROFESSOR K YOUNG THE RT HON MICHAEL HESELTINE MP. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT PRINCIPAL AREA BOUNDARY REVIEW : CITY OF GLOUCESTER/BOROUGH OF CHELTENHAM/DISTRICT OF STROUD/BOROUGH OF TKWKKSBQRY/DISTRICT OF COTSWOLD -' FINAL PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES TO ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS CONSEQUENTIAL TO PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGES INTRODUCTION 1. This Report deals with the electoral consequences of recently announced changes to district boundaries in the vicinity of Leckhampton, Up Hatherley, Prestbury and Swindon, in the Boroughs of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury. BACKGROUND 2. On 25 March 1988, we submitted to your predecessor our Report No. 547, which contained our final proposals,for changes to the administrative boundaries 'of the city of Gloucester ; the Boroughs of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury ; and the Districts of Cotswold and Stroud. 3. In that Report, we stated that we had made no proposals for the-electoral consequences of the proposed boundary changes, and that, our final proposals for such consequences would be the subject of a separate report. In view of the nature and extent of the electoral consequences, we had decided that they ought to be advertised separately in order to give all those affected by them a-i full, opportunity to comment. -
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report
Local Government -V* Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review C TY OF GLOUCESTE 30ROUGH OF CHELTENHAM ) STR CT OF COTSWOLD ST R CT OF STROO OFTEWKESBim LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION t'Olt ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN • Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Professor G E Cherry Mr B Scholes THE RIGHT HONOURABLE NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW CITY"OF GLOUCESTER/BOROUGH OF CHELTENHAM/DISTRICT OF COTSWOLD/DISTRICT OF STROUD/BOROUGH OF TEWKESBURY INTRODUCTION 1. On 8 August 1979, Gloucester City Council asked us to review the City's boundaries, principally on the grounds that these had been overtaken by development and yet had been left unchanged during local government reorganisation. The City Council claimed that the transfer of a number of parishes from the District of Stroud and from the Borough of Tewkesbury would reflect the pattern of community life and be conducive to the effective operation of local government services. We noted from the prior consultations undertaken by the City Council that its request was opposed by Stroud District Council, Tewkesbury Borough Council and all the. parish councils concerned. 2. We considered Gloucester City Council's request, as required by section 48(5) of the Local Government Act 1972. We recalled that in our Report No 1, dealing with our proposals for the creation of new districts in the non- metropolitan counties, we had considered the alternatives of'having five or six districts in Gloucestershire. -
Local Economic Assessment: 2011
Gloucestershire Local Economic Assessment: 2011 Report for GFirst, compiled by Inform Gloucestershire www.gfirst.co.uk GFirst Local Enterprise Partnership Gloucestershire Local Economic Assessment: 2011 Front cover image courtesy of Messier Dowty This report was published on 1st October, 2011. It was commissioned by the GFirst Local Enterprise Partnership and compiled by the Inform Gloucestershire Research and Intelligence Team both of whom are supported by Gloucestershire County Council. The report is available online from the GFirst or Inform Gloucestershire websites www.gfirst.co.uk or www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/inform Gloucestershire Local Economic Assessment: 2011 Executive Summary www.gfirst.co.uk GFirst Local Enterprise Partnership Executive Summary Contents Executive summary 1 Overview 1 2: Geography 1 3: People and Communities 1 4: Business and Enterprise 2 5: Functional Economic Market Areas 3 6: Sustainable Economic Growth 3 Key Issues 4 Future Research 6 Final SWOT analysis 7 Local Economic Assessment Gloucestershire - Executive Summary i Executive Summary This summary presents a brief overview of each chapter comprising the assessment. The key issues section attempts to identify the strengths of the Gloucestershire economy, the inter-relationships that may exist and po- tential threats that are brought out through the use of SWOT analyses. Areas of future research have been iden- tified where gaps in the data have precluded sufficient analysis. Overview 2: Geography Gloucestershire is the northernmost County in the South West region and is divided into six districts all with quite different characteristics. It has been a significant location for commerce since Roman times and located at a cross roads between Wales and London and the West Midlands and the South West it continues to be advanta- geous as a business location. -
A417 Missing Link TR010056 6.4 Environmental Statement Appendix
A417 Missing Link TR010056 6.4 Environmental Statement Appendix 6.3 Historic Landscape Characterisation Planning Act 2008 APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 6 May 2021 A417 Missing Link | HE551505 Highways England Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5(h) A417 Missing Link Development Consent Order 202[x] 6.4 Environmental Statement Appendix 6.3 Historic Landscape Characterisation Regulation Number: 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate TR010056 Scheme Reference Application Document Reference 6.4 Author: A417 Missing Link Version Date Status of Version C01 May 2021 Application Submission A417 Missing Link | HE551505 Highways England Table of Contents Pages 1 Introduction i 2 Historic landscape characterisation ii 2.1 Summary ii 2.2 HLCA01: Area of irregular enclosed fields east of Brockworth (Figure 1) ii 2.3 HLCA02: Woodland south of Great Witcombe (Figure 2) iii 2.4 HLCA03: Agricultural landscape around Brimpsfield and Birdlip (Figure 3) iii 2.5 HLCA04: Agricultural landscape south of Seven Springs (Figure 4) iv 2.6 HLCA05: Brockworth (east of the M5) (Figure 5) v Figures vi References xii Table of Figures Figure 1: HLCA01 Area of irregular enclosed fields east of Brockworth vii Figure 2: HLCA02: Woodland south of Great Witcombe viii Figure 3: HLCA03: Agricultural landscape around Brimpsfield and Birdlip ix Figure 4: HLCA04: Agricultural landscape south of Seven Springs x Figure 5: HLCA05: Brockworth (East of the M5) xi A417 Missing Link | HE551505 Highways England 1 Introduction 1.1.1 Landscapes, alongside buildings, monuments, archaeological sites, places or areas, can possess significance derived from their heritage interest1.