DOCSLIB.ORG

Progress Report Prepared by Turkey Ministry for Eu Affairs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2013 PROGRESS REPORT PREPARED BY TURKEY MINISTRY FOR EU AFFAIRS www.ab.gov.tr REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY FOR EU AFFAIRS Mustafa Kemal Mah. 2082.Cad. No: 4 06510 Bilkent /ANKARA TURKEY Phone: + 90 (312) 218 1300 Fax: + 90 (312) 218 1464 www.ab.gov.tr ISBN: 978-605-5197-22-3 December 2013 Prepared by Ministry for EU Affairs Printed by Fotomat Matbaacılık “According to the second paragraph of Article 5 of the Implementing Regulation on the Procedure and Principles Concerning Bandrole, affixation of banderol is not obligatory.” December 2013 2013 Progress Report prepared by Turkey Foreword by the Minister for EU Affairs and Chief Negotiator The Progress Report by Turkey is one of the most significant documents setting forth the Turkish Government’s determination in the reform process and the steps undertaken in all areas during 2013. This report was first prepared last year during the term of my predecessor, Mr. Egemen Bağış. I would like to thank Mr. Bağış who started this initiative which is significant in terms of reviewing the progress throughout the year in a holistic manner and planning the reforms for the forthcoming years. The year of 2013 which was the 50th anniversary of the Ankara Agreement, has been a period in which Turkey’s reformist character became more prominent and during which important developments have taken place in Turkey-EU relations. First of all, the European Commission’s 2013 Progress Report on Turkey, prepared with an objective and constructive spirit in comparison to the previous reports, ensured a more favorable atmosphere in Turkey-EU relations. The 2013 Report of the Commission acknowledged not only the political reforms but also Turkey’s economic success despite the global crisis, together with our progress in the alignment with the EU acquis. Besides, the opening of the Chapter on “Regional Policy and the Coordination of Structural Instruments” on 5 November 2013 was a critical milestone in ending the 3.5 years long stalemate in the accession negotiations. Furthermore, high-level dialogue meetings were held on strategic sectors such as energy and transport and cooperation mechanisms in various fields have been further enhanced. There is no doubt that this year’s most important development in Turkey-EU relations has been the major step taken which paves the way for a visa-free Europe. The Visa Liberalization Dialogue officially started with the signing of the Readmission Agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding on EU-Turkey Visa Liberalization on 16 December 2013. As underlined by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the EU accession process is the most significant modernization project of Turkey after the proclamation of the Republic. The 2013 Progress Report prepared by the Ministry for EU Affairs with a view to comprehensively and objectively reflecting the latest developments should be perceived as a sign for the Turkish Government’s determination for further reforms. I would like to sincerely thank all those who have contributed to this Report. Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu Minister for EU Affairs and Chief Negotiator Ministry for EU Affairs December 2013 2013 Progress Report prepared by Turkey ABBREVIATIONS AFAD Disaster & Emergency Management Presidency AFCOS Anti-Fraud Coordination Service BRSA Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency CBT Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey CFCU Central Finance and Contracts Unit EIPA European Institute of Public Administration EUROSTAT European Union Statistical Office ICTA Information and Communication Technologies Authority ILO International Labour Organization ISKUR Turkish Labour Institution MoLSS Ministry of Labour and Social Security OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development PETKIM General Directorate of Petroleum Chemicals Industry SDIF Savings Deposit Insurance Fund SGK Social Security Institution SPK Capital Markets Board TAEK Turkish Atomic Energy Authority TAIEX Technical Assistance Information Exchange Office TEDAS Turkish Electricity Distribution Corporation TIKA Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency TPE Turkish Patent Institute TSE Turkish Standards Institution TUBA Turkish Academy of Sciences TUBITAK Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey TURKSTAT Turkish Statistical Institute TURKAK Turkish Accreditation Agency VQA Vocational Qualifications Authority WTO World Trade Organization YAYFED Publisher Collecting Societies Federation YOIKK Coordination Council for the Improvement of Investment Environment YOK Council of Higher Education Ministry for EU Affairs December 2013 2013 Progress Report prepared by Turkey TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Explanations…………………………………………………………… 1 I. Political Criteria……………………………………………………………………....... 3 II. Economic Criteria……………………………………………………………………... 22 2.1The existence of a functioning market economy……………………………………....... 22 2.2 The capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the 29 Union………………………………………………………………………………………. III. Capacity to Assume Obligations of Membership……………………...……………. 32 Chapter 1: Free Movement of Goods………………………………………………………. 32 Chapter 2: Freedom of Movement for Workers……………………………………………. 38 Chapter 3: Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services……………………... 39 Chapter 4: Free Movement of Capital……………………………………………………… 41 Chapter 5: Public Procurement……………………………………………………………... 43 Chapter 6: Company Law…………………………………………………………………... 45 Chapter 7: Intellectual Property Law……………………………………………………….. 51 Chapter 8: Competition Policy……………………………………………………………... 56 Chapter 9 : Financial Services……………………………………………………………… 58 Chapter 10: Information Society and Media……………………………………….............. 62 Chapter 11: Agriculture and Rural Development……………………………………........... 69 Chapter 12: Food Safety, Veterinary and Phytosanitary Policy……………………………. 75 Chapter 13: Fisheries……………………………………………………………………….. 83 Chapter 14: Transport Policy……………………………………………………………….. 85 Chapter 15: Energy…………………………………………………………………………. 91 Chapter 16: Taxation……………………………………………………………………….. 101 Chapter 17: Economic and Monetary Policy……………………………………………….. 103 Chapter 18: Statistics……………………………………………………………………….. 105 Chapter 19: Social Policy and Employment………………………………………………... 110 Chapter 20: Enterprise and Industrial Policy……………………………………………….. 131 Chapter 21: Trans-European Networks…………………………………………………….. 135 Chapter 22: Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments……................... 137 Chapter 23: Judiciary and Fundamental Rights…………………………………………..… 143 Chapter 24: Justice, Freedom and Security………………………………………………… 169 Chapter 25: Science and Research…………………………………………………………. 179 Chapter 26: Education and Culture………………………………………………………… 183 Chapter 27: Environment and Climate Change…………………………………………….. 191 Chapter 28: Consumer and Health Protection…………………………………………….... 202 Chapter 29: Customs Union………………………………………………………………… 207 Chapter 30: External Relations……………………………………………………………... 213 Chapter 31: Foreign, Security and Defence Policy…………………………………………. 217 Chapter 32: Financial Control ……………………………………………………………… 220 Chapter 33: Financial and Budgetary Provisions……………………………………........... 224 IV. Work Under Financial Cooperation ……………………………………...…......... 225 V. Projects Carried Out by the Ministry for EU Affairs………………...………….. 235 VI. Activities Realized in the Context of the European Union Communication 250 Strategy (EUCS)…………………………..………………………………………….. VII. Significance of the EU Process………………………………………………………. 257 Ministry for EU Affairs December 2013 2013 Progress Report prepared by Turkey INTRODUCTION AND EXPLANATIONS The 2013 Progress Report by Turkey sets forth the work carried out and the progress achieved in the context of the European Union (EU) accession process during the January-December 2013 period under the “Political Criteria”, “Economic Criteria” and the “Ability to Assume the Obligations of Membership” titles. The Turkey-EU Financial Cooperation and Civil Society Dialogue and Communication are two key components of the accession process as emphasized in the Negotiating Framework Document for Turkey dated 3 October 2005. Therefore, the report also covers Civil Society Dialogue projects implemented by the Ministry for EU Affairs and activities carried out under Turkey’s European Union Communication Strategy (EUCS) in the last year. The Ministry for EU Affairs is among the institutions responsible for ensuring the effective use of the grants extended in the context of Turkey-EU Financial Cooperation; hence the report summarizes the work undertaken to this end. The progress achieved regarding the Copenhagen Political Criteria and the Accession Partnership Document is presented through the following broad perspective: • Legislation adopted or drafted, • Work and activities for alignment with the EU practices, including administrative capacity building. The information presented in the Report has been compiled considering the work of public institutions and organizations, the reports prepared by the EU institutions and results of the work carried out under the coordination of the Ministry for EU Affairs. This Report has been prepared to present first-hand information on the progress achieved by Turkey in the past year, taking into account criticisms and recommendations by the European Commission. Furthermore, the Report aims to inform the relevant stakeholders and the public by demonstrating that there are many dimensions to the EU accession process apart from the political criteria, such as economic and financial issues, alignment with the acquis and
Recommended publications
  • Geology of Tunceli - Bingöl Region of Eastern Turkey

    Geology of Tunceli - Bingöl Region of Eastern Turkey

    GEOLOGY OF TUNCELİ - BİNGÖL REGION OF EASTERN TURKEY F. A. AFSHAR Middle East Technical University, Ankara ABSTRACT. — This region is located in the Taurus orogenic belt of the highland district of Eastern Turkey. Lower Permian metasediments and Upper Permian suberystalline limestone are the oldest exposed formations of this region. Lower Cretaceous flysch overlies partly eroded Upper Permian limestone discordantly. The enormous thickness of flysch, tuffs, basaltic - andesitic flows, and limestones constitute deposits of Lower Cretaceous, Upper Cretaceous, and Lower Eocene; the deposits of each of these periods are separated from the others by an unconformity. Middle Eocene limestone is overlain discordantly by Lower Miocene marine limestone which grades upward into lignite-bearing marls of Middle Miocene and red beds of Upper Miocene. After Upper Miocene time, this region has been subjected to erosion and widespread extrusive igneous activities. During Permian this region was part of Tethys geosyncline; in Triassic-Jurassic times it was subjected to orogenesis, uplift and erosion, and from Lower Cretaceous until Middle Eocene it was part of an eugeosyncline. It was affected by Variscan, pre-Gosauan, Laramide, Pyrenean, and Attian orogenies. The entire sedimentary section above the basement complex is intensely folded, faulted, subjected to igneous intrusion, and during five orogenic episodes has been exposed and eroded. INTRODUCTION In the August of 1964 the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey assigned the writer to undertake geologic study of the region which is the subject of discussion in this report. This region is located in the highland district of Eastern Turkey, extending from Karasu River in the north to Murat River in the south.
  • Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000

    Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000

    MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11
  • Dogan and Others V Turkey 29Jun04

    Dogan and Others V Turkey 29Jun04

    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 June 2004 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Dogan and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr G. RESS, President, Mr I. CABRAL BARRETO, Mr L. CAFLISCH, Mr R. TÜRMEN, Mr J. HEDIGAN, Mrs M. TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA, Mrs H.S. GREVE, judges, and Mr V. BERGER, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 12 February and 10 June 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in fifteen applications (nos. 8803/02, 8804/02, 8805/02, 8806/02, 8807/02, 8808/02, 8809/02, 8810/02, 8811/02, 8813/02, 8815/02, 8816/02, 8817/02, 8818/02 and 8819/02) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by fifteen Turkish nationals, Mr Abdullah Dogan, Mr Cemal Dogan, Mr Ali Riza Dogan, Mr Ahmet Dogan, Mr Ali Murat Dogan, Mr Hasan Yildiz, Mr Hidir Balik, Mr Ihsan Balik, Mr Kazim Balik, Mr Mehmet Dogan, Mr Müslüm Yildiz, Mr Hüseyin Dogan, Mr Yusuf Dogan, Mr Hüseyin Dogan and Mr Ali Riza Dogan (“the applicants”), on 3 December 2001.
  • Culture, Politics and Contested Identity Among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: the Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival

    Culture, Politics and Contested Identity Among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: the Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival

    Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2019 2019, Vol. 6, No. 1, 63-76 ISSN: 2149-1291 Culture, Politics and Contested Identity among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: The Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival Ülker Sözen1 Netherlands Institute in Turkey This article analyzes the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival organized by the people of Dersim, an eastern province of Turkey, as a site of political activism, cultural reproduction, and intra-group contestation. The festival began as a group- remaking event for restoring cultural identity, defending locality, and mobilizing Dersimli people in the face of political repression. In time, socio-spatial and political fragmentation within Dersimli society became more prevalent. The festival experience came to reflect and contribute to the debates and anxieties about identity whereby different political groups competed to increase their influence over local politics as well as the event itself. On the one hand, this article discusses the organization of the Munzur Festival, its historical trajectory, and the accompanying public debates and criticisms. On the other, it explores festive sociabilities, cultural performances, and the circulation of politically-charged symbols throughout the event which showcases the articulation and competition of multiple ethno-political belongings which are the Dersimli, Kurdish, Alevi, and socialist ones. The festival’s historical trajectory is dealt as two stages, unified struggle and internal strife, whereby the festival appeared as first a group-remaking then unmaking public event. The paper argues that this transformation is tied to hanging power relations in the local politics of Dersim, and the shifting state policies, namely the phase of repressive control strategies until the mid-2000s and the peace process and political relaxation until 2015.
  • II. Abdülhamid Döneminde Dersim Sancağındaki İdari Yapı Ve Ulaşım Ağı* Administrative Structure and Transportation Network in the Time of II

    II. Abdülhamid Döneminde Dersim Sancağındaki İdari Yapı Ve Ulaşım Ağı* Administrative Structure and Transportation Network in the Time of II

    II. Abdülhamid Döneminde Dersim Sancağındaki İdari Yapı ve Ulaşım Ağı* Administrative Structure and Transportation Network in the Time of II. Abdülhamid in the Dersim Sanjak İbrahim YILMAZÇELİK** - Sevim ERDEM*** Öz Osmanlı Devleti, kurulduğu andan itibaren bayındırlığa ve özellikle de yollara önem ver- miştir. Osmanlı tarafından inşa edilen yollar, daha önce Roma ve Bizanslılarda olduğu gibi, sadece fetih amaçlı değil daimi bir yol politikası olup, yolların güzergâhlarının belirlenme- sinde askeri amaçlar kadar ticari menfaatlerde dikkate alınmıştır. Günümüz ulaşım ağının temeli, kervan yollarından oluşan daha eski bir sistemden gelişmiş olup bunun en azından 1920’li yıllara kadar bu süreklilik arz ettiği bilinmektedir. Askeri amaçlı yollar eski ve sta- tiktir. Bu sebeple yol ağının değişiminde, ordu yollarından ziyade ticari kervan yolları daha önemlidir. Osmanlı döneminde askeri amaçlı yollar oluştururken, eğer yeni bir yol ağı ise öncelikle yürüyüş talimatnamesi hazırlanır, eğer kullanıma uygun ise bu güzergâhtan geçiş kanunlaştırırdı. Askeri amaçlı yollar bilhassa padişahın sefere çıkacağı zamanlarda önem arz etmekteydi. Ancak Osmanlı Devletinin son dönemlerinde askeri amaçlı yolların yapımında, sefer zihniyetinden ziyade eşkıyalık olaylarını önleme ve ülke asayişini temin etme, temel esası oluşturmuştur. Dersim sancağı, Doğu Anadolu’nun İç Anadolu ile birleştiği yerde oldukça arızalı bir bölge olup, güneyde Murat Suyu, batıda Karasu, kuzeyde Munzur sıradağları ve doğuda ise Peri Suyu ile çevrilidir. Bölgenin coğrafi şartları, bu
  • Forced Evacuations and Destruction of Villages in Dersim (Tunceli), and Western Bingöl, Turkish Kurdistan September-November 1994

    Forced Evacuations and Destruction of Villages in Dersim (Tunceli), and Western Bingöl, Turkish Kurdistan September-November 1994

    FORCED EVACUATIONS AND DESTRUCTION OF VILLAGES IN DERSIM (TUNCELI), AND WESTERN BINGÖL, TURKISH KURDISTAN SEPTEMBER-NOVEMBER 1994 INTRODUCTION This report details the wave of village evacuations and demolitions, as well as the forest fires that swept across the Dersim region in Turkey, i.e., the province of Tunceli and neighbouring districts, during the autumn of 1994.1 Over a period of two months, around a third of the villages in that province (but in some subdistricts as many as 80 to 100 percent) were evacuated under severe military pressure, and many of them were destroyed and burned down by the army. Thousands of families lost their houses. Moreover large stretches of forest, that only recently had been designated as a nature reserve, were deliberately burnt down. The rationale for all this destruction was the presence of guerrillas of the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), believed to be hiding out in the forests of this province. The inhabitants of the destroyed villages were suspected of giving food and shelter to these guerrillas. Tunceli was not the first province to fall victim to large-scale village evacuations orchestrated by Turkish security forces. The first instances of forced village evacuations in recent years took place in the 1980s, and since 1992 evacuations followed by demolition have been standard practice in sensitive zones of Turkey's Kurdish-inhabited provinces. The Human Rights Associations of Turkey have repeatedly published lists of villages that had been evacuated and destroyed, adding up to well over 2000 names of villages and hamlets. The present report concentrates on the events in Tunceli.
  • Persistence of Armenian and Greek Influence in Turkey

    Persistence of Armenian and Greek Influence in Turkey

    Minorities and Long-run Development: Persistence of Armenian and Greek Influence in Turkey ∗ Cemal Eren Arbatlı Gunes Gokmen y July 2015 Abstract Mass deportations and killings of Ottoman Armenians during WWI and the Greek-Turkish population exchange after the Greco-Turkish War of 1919-1922 were the two major events of the early 20th century that permanently changed the ethno-religious landscape of Anatolia. These events marked the end of centuries-long coexistence of the Muslim populations with the two biggest Christian communities of the region. These communities played a dominant role in craftsmanship, manufacturing, commerce and trade in the Empire. In this paper, we empirically investigate the long-run contribution of the Armenian and Greek communities in the Ottoman period on regional development in modern Turkey. We show that districts with greater presence of Greek and Armenian minorities at the end of the 19th century are systematically more densely populated, more urbanized and exhibit greater economic activity today. These results are qualitatively robust to accounting for an extensive set of geographical and historical factors that might have influenced long-run development on the one hand and minority settlement patterns on the other. We explore two potential channels of persistence. First, we provide evidence that Greeks and Armenians might have contributed to long-run economic development through their legacy on human capital accumulation at the local level. This finding possibly reflects the role of inter-group spillovers of cultural values, technology and know-how as well as the self-selection of skilled labor into modern economic sectors established by Armenian and Greek entrepreneurs.
  • Kirmanjki (Zazaki) Speaking Kurds and Their Ethnic Identity*

    Kirmanjki (Zazaki) Speaking Kurds and Their Ethnic Identity*

    KIRMANJKI (ZAZAKI) SPEAKING KURDS AND THEIR ETHNIC IDENTITY* Munzur Çem (Chem), Writer 1. Introduction: Kirmanjki (Zazaki) speaking Kurds are living in the areas along Turkish State Boundaries namely, in northern Kurdistan. As like the population of all Kurds, because of suppressions and prohibitions there are no exact figures for the population of the Kirmanjki (Zazaki) speaking people. According to my opinion this group is ranging between 3 – 3.5 million. The majority of Kirmanjki speaking Kurds live mainly in the provinces Çewlig(Bingöl) and Dersim(Tunceli) with smaller populations residing in the provinces Erzirum(Erzurum), Erzingan(Erzincan), Qers (Kars), Muş (Mush), Xarpet (Elaziğ), Diyarbekir, Ruha (Urfa), Semsur (Adiyaman), Bedlis (Bitlis), Sert (Siirt), Nigde, Kayseri, Gümüşhane and Sivas as well as in the central parts of Turkey. (1). Only in Tunceli and Bingöl provinces the Kirmanjs (Zazas) are majority, in the other provinces they are minority. 2. Ethnic Origins of Naming Traditionally, Kirmanj (Zaza) Kurds do not call themselves by one common name. For example, the people living in the vicinity of Dersim, Erzingan (Erzincan) and Erzurum call themselves “Kirmanj”(as ethnic identity), “Kird” in the vicinity of Çewlig and “Zaza” in some areas around Elaziğ and „Dimili”, in Sewrege and Sêrt (Siirt). However, the majority are called Kirmanj and Kird. There is no explanation for why the two factions of the populations speaking the same dialect use different names for their common language, neither is it possible to give a reason why people living in different areas, who use the same dialect, name this same dialect differently. Kirmanj Kurds, give different names to their own dialect such as Kirmanjki, Kirdki, Zazaki and Dimlki.
  • Hacettepe Bulletin of Natural Sciences and Engineering

    Hacettepe Bulletin of Natural Sciences and Engineering

    a I HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE TURKEY HACETTEPE BULLETIN OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING An Annual publication Volume 29 / 2000 Series A BIOLOGY and CHEMISTRY 1- ......... ...e 270\.., .. ,1 URTFl' ISSN 0072 - 9221 Turkey HACETTEPE BULLETIN OF· NATURAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING An Annual publication Volume 29 I 2000 Series A BIOLOGY and CHEMISTRY ISSN 0072 - 9221 \ HACETTEPE BULLETIN OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING AN ANNUAL PUBLICATION VOLUME 29 / 2000 ISSN 0072·9221 SERIES A SAHiBi OWNER Hacettepe0 ni versitesi On Behalfof Hacettepe Fen Faktiltesi Adma University Faculty of Science Dekan Dean ALiKALAYCloGLU EDiTOR EDITOR GOROLOKAY ADVISORY BOARD AYSEBOSGELMEZ SERDAR ATES EMiR CANSUNAR ADiLDENizLl NESECAGATAY MEHMET DOGAN ALI DEMiRSOY Y A VUZiMAMOGLU SADIK ERiK ERHAN piSKiN FOSUN ERK'AKAN ATTiLAYILDIZ NAZiFKOLANKAY A AYOGOS A BULLETIN PUBLISHED BY HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE Hacettepe University, Faculty of Science 06532 Beytepe, Ankara I TURKEY Tel: (312)2992080 Fax: (312) 299 20 93 Printed at the Science Faculty Press. ©2000 CONTENTS Biology Series A KENAN DEM1REL, MAHMUT NACAR Macrofungi Of <;emi~gezek (Tunceli) Dlstnct......................................................... l AYDIN AKBULUT, NURAY (EMIR) AKBULUT Planktonic Organisms Of The Manyas Lake .......................................................... 9 ALl A. DONMEZ An Ethnobotanical Study In The Karagi.iney Mountain (Kmkkale): Uses, Nutnatlonal Value And Vernacular Names.................................................. 23 PERiHAN GOLER,
  • BİR TUTAM TUNCELİ.Pdf

    BİR TUTAM TUNCELİ.Pdf

    T.C. TUNCELİ VALİLİĞİ TUNCELİ 2012 T.C. TUNCELİ VALİLİĞİ www.tunceli.gov.tr ISBN: 978-605-87210-2-9 Koordinasyon İsmet Hakan ULAŞOĞLU İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürü Erdoğan ELALDI Yazar Yüksel IŞIK Fotoğraflar Malik KAYA Deran ATABEY Tunceli Valiliği Arşivi İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü Arşivi Proje Adı: “Geçmişten Geleceğe Tunceli” Projesi Sözleşme No: TRB1/DFD/2011/38 “Bu proje; Fırat Kalkınma Ajansı tarafından Doğrudan Faaliyet Destek Programı kapsamında desteklenmiştir.” “Bu yayının içeriği, Fırat Kalkınma Ajansı ve/veya T.C.Kalkınma Bakanlığının görüşlerini yansıtmamakta olup, içerik ile ilgili sorumluluk yazara aittir.” Baskı ANIT MATBAA / ANKARA Tel: 0312 232 54 77 İÇİNDEKİLER TAKDİM ......................................................................................5 9. Cem Töreni ................................................................................. 75 10. 12 İmam (Muharrem Orucu) ......................................... 76 I. BÖLÜM: GENEL BİLGİLER..................................................7 11. Hızır Orucu ............................................................................... 77 A. Kısa Tunceli Tarihi .................................................................. 10 B. Tunceli El Sanatları ................................................................. 78 B. Tunceli İlçeleri ........................................................................... 15 1. Dokumacılık .......................................................................... 78 C. Tunceli Coğrafyası ................................................................
  • TUNCELİ YÖRESİ TÜRKMEN AĞIZLARININ ÖZELLİKLERİ İbrahim TOSUN* the CHARACTERISTICS of TURKMEN DIALECTS in the DISTRICT O

    TUNCELİ YÖRESİ TÜRKMEN AĞIZLARININ ÖZELLİKLERİ İbrahim TOSUN* the CHARACTERISTICS of TURKMEN DIALECTS in the DISTRICT O

    Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 7/3, Summer 2012, p. 2455-2480, ANKARA-TURKEY TUNCELİ YÖRESİ TÜRKMEN AĞIZLARININ ÖZELLİKLERİ İbrahim TOSUN* ÖZET Karahan’ın sınıflandırmasında Doğu Grubu ağızları arasında yer alan Tunceli yöresi Türkmen ağızları, yörenin en eski yerleşim merkezleri olan Pertek, Hozat, Çemişgezek ve Mazgirt ilçeleri ile bu ilçelere bağlı bazı köylerin ağızlarını içine alır. Tunceli’nin güney ve güneybatısında, Keban barajı boyunca uzanan sınır bölgesinde yerleşmiş Türk toplulukları bu ağzı konuşurlar. Ağız özellikleri bakımından Elazığ/Harput ve Erzincan’la tamamen, diğer Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu ağızlarıyla da kısmen örtüşen Tunceli yöresi Türkmen ağızlarının aşağıda belirlenmiş özelliklerinin çoğu Doğu Grubu ağızları ile ortaklık gösterirken bunlardan bazıları yöreye özgüdür ve karakteristik niteliktedir. Yöredeki Türkmen ağızları incelenirken yaklaşık kırk özellik tespit edilmiş, bu özelliler bu ağızlardan derlenmiş örneklerle desteklenmiştir. Tunceli Yöresi Türkmen ağızları, belirlenmiş bu kırk özellik bakımından bir birlik oluştururken bazı küçük, yöresel, fonetik farklılıklar, bu Türkmen ağzı içinde üç ayrı alt ağız grubu olduğunu da ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Yöre ağızlarının genel özelliklerine topluca bakıldığında, yörede Türk boylarından çoğunlukla Avşar daha seyrek olarak da Salur boyunun dil özelliklerinin hâkim olduğu görülmektedir. Fakat şunu da söylemek gerekir ki Anadolu’da, Oğuzların bu topraklara yerleşiminden bu yana, zorunlu
  • Case of Turkey, the European Union, and the Kurdish Problem

    Case of Turkey, the European Union, and the Kurdish Problem

    SIGNIFICANCE OF EXTERNAL F/ACTORS IN THE DEMOCRATIZATION PROCESS: CASE OF TURKEY, THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND THE KURDISH PROBLEM by Fidel Aksoy Berlin, 2012 A dissertation submitted to the Department of Political and Social Sciences of Freie Universität Berlin in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Political Science (Dr. rer. pol.) Advisor / First Reader: Prof. Dr. Ferhad Ibrahim Seyder Second Reader: Prof. Dr. Helgard Kramer Date of Thesis Defense: 27 January 2012 ii DEDICATION to the peaceful coexistence between the Kurdish and Turkish people, and to my family. iii CONTENTS List of Maps, Figures and Tables……………………………………………………………viii List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………….…ix Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….….xi Chapter 1 – Introduction…………………………………………………………………..…1 I. RESEARCH QUESTION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF RESEARCH………….1 II. CASE STUDY: TURKEY…………………………………………………..…4 III. THREE PHASES OF DEMOCRATIZATION………………………………..7 IV. AIMS OF THE STUDY……………………………………………………..…8 Chapter 2 – Literature Review and Methodology ……………………..………………….10 I. DEFINING DEMOCRACY……………………...…………………………..10 1 – Democracy as a Regime Type and as a Social Model…………………….10 II. LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………………..12 1 – Agent-based and Modernization Approaches in Democratization Studies…………………………………………………..12 2 – Literature on the International Aspects of Democratization……………...15 III. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK……………………………………………18 1 – Inside-Outside Linkage…………………………………………………...18 IV. METHODICAL CATEGORIZATION OF EXTERNAL F/ACTORS………20