DOCSLIB.ORG

Discussion Paper Submissions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discussion Paper Submissions Table of Contents Agriculture and Rural System Discussion Paper .....................................................................................................................................Section I Agency Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 1 Municipal Comments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Table 2 Public Comments .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 3 Climate Change and Sustainability Discussion Paper ............................................................................................................................. Section II Agency Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 1 Municipal Comments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Table 2 Public Comments .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 3 Growth Management (Urban System) Discussion Paper ....................................................................................................................... Section III Agency Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 1 Municipal Comments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Table 2 Public Comments .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 3 Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper ....................................................................................................................... Section IV Agency Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 1 Municipal Comments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Table 2 Public Comments .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 3 Transportation System Discussion Paper ............................................................................................................................................... Section V Agency Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Table 1 Municipal Comments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Table 2 Public Comments .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 3 Housing Policy Planning Discussion Paper ........................................................................................................................................... Section VI Agency Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 1 Municipal Comments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Table 2 Public Comments .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Table 3 Agriculture and Rural System Discussion Paper Submissions – Agency Comments Submission Number and Description of Submission Regional Staff Response Name 001-01 • Food sustainability/security should also be referenced. • Food security is currently referenced in the existing Parks Canada ROP and will be carried over into the new ROP. 001-02 • With regard to the section on “broadening goals and policies” in • Comment noted by staff. Parks Canada the Executive Summary, feels this section describes what appears to be a commitment to future policy direction and is premature to include in a discussion paper. 001-03 • Suggest indicating that Parks Canada's Rouge National Urban • A policy direction has been included to add the Parks Canada Park Management Plan (2019) governs land use in the park. Rouge National Urban Park as a Specific Policy Area, with specific reference to the Rouge National Urban Park Management Plan. 001-04 • With regard to the discussion paper referencing work on an • The Durham Agricultural Sector Adaptation Parks Canada agriculture sector climate adaptation strategy, the need and Strategy recognizes farmers as stewards of the potential for agriculture to contribute to climate change land and notes the critical role they play in climate mitigation should be noted. resiliency through the implementation of best management practices. 001-05 • Note that RNUP did not exist at the time of the current OP (and • A policy direction has been included to add the Parks Canada perhaps this could be a recommendation for a new specific Rouge National Urban Park as a Specific Policy policy area). Area. 001-06 • With regard to the Region’s land base calculations, RNUP does • Comment noted by staff. Parks Canada not appear to be reflected in the numbers. 001-07 • Having public roads as long-term borders between the urban • The ongoing Growth Management Study will Parks Canada area and agricultural lands. inform the Region’s approach to future policy • There may be a need for policies to guide interim boundaries directions related to edge planning. This approach between urban and agricultural uses as development in will ensure any boundary expansions are done with designated urban areas expands outward. consideration for the impacts to rural land uses. Proposed Policy Directions – Online Compendium | 1 Agriculture and Rural System Discussion Paper Submissions – Agency Comments Submission Number and Description of Submission Regional Staff Response Name 001-08 • Management Plan for the RNUP is now in force as of the time of • A policy direction has been included to add the Parks Canada the release of the discussion paper. Rouge National Urban Park as a Specific Policy Area and to seek consistency with the Management Plan. 001-09 • RNUP appreciates and supports the direction of recognizing the • A policy direction has been included to add the Parks Canada RNUP, including whether planning for the lands surrounding Rouge National Urban Park as a Specific Policy RNUP should consider the Management Plan, account for Area, with specific reference to the Rouge National connections to and through the Park, and how it can support Urban Park Management Plan. agriculture both within and surrounding the RNUP. Parks Canada staff would welcome discussion during the OP Review to define more specific policy synergies and direction for the OP. 001-10 • With regard to Specific Policy Area A – Duffins/Rouge • A policy direction has been included to update Parks Canada Agricultural Preserve and Seaton: Specific Policy Area A based on changes to the • There may be possibilities for synergies between farming in the Pickering Official Plan, and Central Pickering West Duffins/Rouge Agricultural Reserve and Rouge National Development Plan. Urban Park. The start of development at Seaton on the east also provides an opportunity to update policies for the agricultural reserve. 001-11 • With regard to eliminating the requirement for agricultural • Comment noted by staff. Parks Canada products to be sourced from the farm unit upon which a farm stand is situated – the Region may wish to encourage (or require) local sourcing and not from a food terminal (as an example). 001-12 • The Land Use and Activity Assessment Framework described on • Comments were considered by staff as part of the Parks Canada page 24 of the RNUP management plan may provide some proposed policy directions regarding Specific Policy guidance. Parks Canada intends to elaborate this framework Areas. within the period of the OP review and would welcome • Staff will work with Parks Canada during
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report 2016
    Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the efforts of former Metrolinx Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) members Mr. Sean Henry and Mr. Brian Moore, both of whom stepped down from the AAC in 2016. They provided valuable input into our accessibility planning efforts. We would like to welcome Mr. Gordon Ryall and Ms. Heather Willis, who both joined the Metrolinx AAC in 2015. Lastly, we would like to thank all of the Metrolinx AAC members for the important work they do as volunteers to improve the accessibility of our services. Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report: 2016 1. Introduction The 2016 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report provides an annual update of the Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan published in December 2012, as well as the 2015 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report. Metrolinx, a Crown agency of the Province of Ontario under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation, has three operating divisions: GO Transit, PRESTO and Union Pearson Express. This Status Report, in conjunction with the December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, fulfills Metrolinx’s legal obligations for 2016 under the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (ODA), to publish an annual accessibility plan; and also under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), to publish an annual status report on its multi-year plan. The December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and other accessibility planning documents can be referenced on the Metrolinx website at the following link: www.metrolinx.com/en/aboutus/accessibility/default.aspx. In accordance with the AODA, it must be updated every five years. Metrolinx, including its operating divisions, remains committed to proceeding with plans to ensure AODA compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • @280-350 Harwood Avenue South Ajax, ON
    For More Information Contact: *Sales Representative Samantha Sukumar* Associate Vice President 416 495 6252 [email protected] Kathryn Schubert Sales Representative 416 798 6234 [email protected] Kristine Macatangay Sales Representative 416 798 6283 [email protected] harwood plaza @280-350 Harwood Avenue South Ajax, ON availabilities Spaces: Suite 200: 20,859 sq. ft. (divisible) Suite 204: 3,357 sq. ft. Net Rent: $8.50 per sq. ft. office suites Additional Rent: $13.73 per sq. ft. (2019 Est.) for lease CBRE Limited, Brokerage | 5935 Airport Road, Suite 700 Mississauga, ON L4V 1W5 | www.cbre.ca harwood plaza // 280-350 harwood avenue south // ajax, ontario floor plan: Suite 200: 20,859 sq. ft. (divisible) harwood plaza // 280-350 harwood avenue south // ajax, ontario floor plan: Suite 204: 3,357 sq. ft. harwood plaza // 280-350 harwood avenue south // ajax, ontario on-site amenities: public transit: • A&W • Mucho Burrito • Rental City Serviced by Durham Region Transit • Booster Juice • One Nails Pro • Scotiabank • Dollarama • Pita Land • Shoppers Drug Mart • Route 216: Harwood North* • Route 224: Harwood-Salem* • Factory Direct • Pizza Pizza • Subway • Route 223: Bayly* • Routes 291 & 292: Ajax Community Routes • Food Basics • Popeyes • Tim Hortons • Good Life Fitness • RBC Bank * Connects to Ajax GO Station (2.6 kms) (With connections to the Oshawa GO Station/Via Rail Station) * Connects to Pickering GO Station (5.8 kms) HUNT ST BAYLY ST WEST SITE COMMERCIAL AVE HARWOOD AVE SOUTH For More Information Contact: *Sales Representative Samantha Sukumar* Kathryn Schubert Kristine Macatangay Associate Vice President Sales Representative Sales Representative 416 495 6252 416 798 6234 416 798 6283 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] CBRE Limited, Brokerage | 5935 Airport Road | Suite 700 | Mississauga, ON | L4V 1W5 | www.cbre.ca This disclaimer shall apply to CBRE Limited, Real Estate Brokerage, and to all other divisions of the Corporation (“CBRE”).
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan Report
    Transportation Master Plan Final Report City of Toronto May 9, 2017 City of Toronto | ConsumersNext TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN REPORT Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................11 1.1 Study Area and Background .......................................................................................11 1.2 TMP Purpose and EA Process....................................................................................12 2 Planning Context ................................................................................................................14 2.1 Local Area Characteristics ..........................................................................................14 2.1.1 Profile Summary ..................................................................................................14 2.1.2 Natural Environment ............................................................................................14 2.1.3 Cultural and Archaeological Heritage ...................................................................14 2.2 Provincial Planning Context ........................................................................................15 2.3 City of Toronto Policy Framework ...............................................................................16 2.3.1 Toronto Official Plan ............................................................................................16 2.3.2 Transportation Policies ........................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • John Hemingway, Mira Vervoorn and Nancy
    LPAT Case Nos. PL171084 PL180158 PL180580 MM180022 MM170004 LOCAL PLANNING APPEAL TRIBUNAL Tribunal d’appel de l’aménagement local PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended Applicant and Appellant: ClubLink Corporation ULC and ClubLink Holdings Ltd. Subject: Request to amend the Official Plan - Refusal of request by the Town of Oakville Existing Designation: Private Open Space and Natural Area Proposed Designation: Site Specific (to be determined) – including Residential, Mixed Use and Community Commercial Purpose: To permit the redevelopment of the Subject Lands for a mix of residential, commercial and open space uses Property Address/Description: 1333 Dorval Drive Municipality: Town of Oakville Approval Authority File No.: OPA.1519.09 LPAT Case No.: PL171084 LPAT File No.: PL171084 LPAT Case Name: ClubLink Corporation ULC v. Oakville (Town) PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended Applicant and Appellant: ClubLink Corporation ULC and ClubLink Holdings Ltd. Subject: Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 2014-014 - Refusal of Application by the Town of Oakville Existing Zoning: Private Open Space (O2), Private Open Space-Special (O2- Sp. 114), and Natural Area (N) Proposed Zoning: Site Specific (to be determined) Purpose: To permit the redevelopment of the Subject Lands for a mix of residential, commercial and open space uses Property Address/Description: 1333 Dorval Drive Municipality: Town of Oakville Municipality File No.: Z.1519.09 LPAT Case No.: PL171084 LPAT File No.: PL171085 H364638-02-230-0002, Rev. A Page 1 © Hatch 2021 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
    [Show full text]
  • ​COVID-19 Durham Resources
    ​ UPDATED April 16 2020 ​ ​COVID-19 Durham Resources *Please note that the attached documents are currently up to date, but that in all likelihood some of the information might become outdated in the coming weeks. As such, please treat this as a guide and please connect directly with the agencies and services listed via phone, email or by visiting their websites for the most up to date information. 1 ​ UPDATED April 16 2020 ​ Table of Contents COMMUNITY SERVICES AND OUTREACH …………………………..…. Page 3-8 ​ CRISIS RESPONSE ….……………………………………………...………...…. Page 9 ​ EMERGENCY CHILDCARE ….……………………...………………………..... Page 10 ​ FOOD BANKS ……………………………………………………………….. Page 11-18 ​ (including Grocery Delivery Services) ………………………………..…... Page 18 ​ HOUSING SECURITY ……………………………………………………… Page 19 ​ INCOME SECURITY …………………………………………………………... Page 21 ​ NATIVE RESOURCES …………………………………………………………..Page 23 ​ MEDICAL SERVICES ……………………………………………………….. Page 23 ​ (including Pharmacy’s that provide delivery) ……………………….….. Page 24 ​ SUPPORTS FOR VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ……………………………..….. Page 25 ​ RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT YOUTH …………………………… Page 26 ​ TRANSIT ……………………………………………………………………. Page 28 ​ 2 ​ UPDATED April 16 2020 ​ COMMUNITY SERVICES AND OUTREACH Child & Youth Supports Central Intake: ​ Central Intake is the front door to services and supports for children and youth who need help with a mental health issue or who have a diagnosed autism spectrum disorder. Central Intake can answer your questions, guide you through the referral process or steer you to an agency or service in the community that can best meet your needs. For service, please call Central Intake; 1-888-454-6275 or https://www.kinark.on.ca/contact-us/ Frontenac Youth services: (Free)- Age 12+ ​ Frontenac Youth Services is a non-profit organization that provides services and programming for youth in Durham Region who experience mental health concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Study
    ALTONA GROUP UPDATED TRANPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 1294 KINGSTON ROAD, 1848 & 1852 LIVERPOOL ROAD CITY OF PICKERING J u l y 2 0 2 0 1 9 2 2 5 U p d a t e d Transportation Impact Assessment 1294 Kingston Road, 1848 & 1852 Liverpool Road, City of Pickering Disclaimer This Report represents the work of LEA Consulting Ltd (“LEA”). This Report may not be relied upon for detailed implementation or any other purpose not specifically identified within this Report. This Document is confidential and prepared solely for the use of Altona Group. Neither LEA, its sub-consultants nor their respective employees assume any liability for any reason, including, but not limited to, negligence, to any party other than Altona Group for any information or representation herein. CANADA | INDIA | AFRICA | MIDDLE EAST Page |i U p d a t e d Transportation Impact Assessment 1294 Kingston Road, 1848 & 1852 Liverpool Road, City of Pickering TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 Existing Transportation Conditions .......................................................................................... 3 Road Network and Site Accesses ..................................................................................................... 3 Traffic Data Collection ..................................................................................................................... 4 Collision Data Analysis ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • April 5, 2017 Draft Disclaimer This Document Is a Draft and Is Provided
    April 5, 2017 Draft Disclaimer This document is a draft and is provided for information only. The information contained herein is subject to change during the Transit Project Assessment Process. The final version of this document will be available following the Notice of Completion. APPENDIX B Preliminary ESA Gap Analysis Report – Rail Corridors DRAFT GO Rail Network Electrification Transit Project Assessment Process Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors Submitted to: Submitted by: GF Project No. 060277/060070 DRAFT GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors METROLINX GO RAIL NETWORK ELECTRIFICATION Quality Assurance Document Release Form Name of Firm: MORRISON HERSHFIELD Document Name: Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors Revision No. 1 Submittal Date: November 24, 2016 Discipline: Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Prepared By: Jonathan Kerr and Forest Pearson Date: July, 2016 Reviewed By: Leah Deveaux Date: October 14, 2016 Approved By : Amber Saltarelli Date: November 30, 2016 Project Manager The above electronic signatures indicate that the named document is controlled by GF Canada ULC, and has been: 1. Prepared by qualified staff in accordance with generally accepted professional practice. 2. Checked for completeness and accuracy by the appointed discipline reviewers and that the discipline reviewers did not perform the original work. 3. Reviewed and resolved compatibility interfaces and potential conflicts among the involved disciplines. 4. Updated to address previously agreed-to reviewer comments, including any remaining comments from previous internal or external reviews. 5. Reviewed for conformance to scope and other statutory and regulatory requirements. 6. Determined suitable for submittal by the Project Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • CS-20-44 DRT and Metrolinx Requests
    Public Report To: Community Services Committee From: Ron Diskey, Commissioner, Community Services Department Report Number: CS-20-44 Date of Report: September 16, 2020 Date of Meeting: September 21, 2020 Subject: Durham Region Transit and Metrolinx Requests for Expanded Downtown Bus Stop Locations and relocating of Bus layover in downtown Oshawa File: E-1400 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this report is to respond to requests from Durham Region Transit (D.R.T.) regarding a bus layover in downtown Oshawa and Metrolinx and D.R.T. for the expansion of their bus stops in downtown Oshawa. 2.0 Recommendation That the Community Services Committee recommend to City Council: 1. That based on Report CS-20-44, dated September 16, 2020, that the bus stops and bus layover on City Streets in downtown Oshawa be expanded and relocated as requested by Durham Region Transit and Metrolinx; and, 2. That Traffic By-law 79-99, as amended, be further amended to remove the paid on- street parking stalls, and implement ‘No Stopping, Buses Excepted’ restrictions at the expanded bus stop and bus layover locations; and, 3. That a copy of this report be sent to Durham Region Transit and Metrolinx. 3.0 Executive Summary Not applicable. 4.0 Input From Other Sources • Durham Region Transit (D.R.T.) • Metrolinx • Development Services 282 Report to Community Services Committee Item: CS-20-44 Meeting Date: September 21, 2020 Page 2 • Finance Services 5.0 Analysis 5.1 Durham Region Transit/Metrolinx Bus Stops Durham Region Transit and Metrolinx recently met with staff to request the expansion of some existing bus stops in downtown Oshawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Airport Pick-Up Via Rail/Train
    PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FROM TORONTO PEARSON AIRPORT Take Union Pearson Express Rail from Toronto Pearson International Airport to Union Station in the heart of downtown Toronto. At Union Station, take the GO train from Union Station to Ajax GO Station, 100 Westney Rd S. Please contact us if you require a pick-up from the Ajax GO Station. For more information, visit www.upexpress.com and www.gotransit.com FROM BILLY BISHOP AIRPORT Take the Billy Bishop Airport Shuttle from Mainland Ferry Terminal (4 Eireann Quay) to downtown across from Union Station on the east side of York St. Head south on York St. to Union Station on southeast corner of Front Street and York St. At Union Station, take the GO train from Union Station to Ajax GO Station, 100 Westney Rd S. Please contact us if you require a pick-up from the Ajax GO Station. For more information, visit www.portstoronto.com and www.gotransit.com AIRPORT PICK-UP Shuttle options will be available at designated times still to be determined. The airport pick-up shuttle will be on Tuesday and Wednesday only and the airport drop-off shuttle will be on Friday only. For those interested in a direct shuttle from the airport please contact [email protected] with your flight information including arrival date/time, departure date/time and airport (i.e., Toronto Pearson Airport or Billy Bishop Airport). VIA RAIL/TRAIN FROM THE EAST Take VIA Rail train to Oshawa VIA Rail station. Cross platform to VIA Rail and GO Transit concourse. Take the GO train from Oshawa GO Station to Ajax GO Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Payment Systems, Digital Divide and Transit Inequity: a Study of the Toronto Transit Commission’S Implementation of the Presto System
    SMART PAYMENT SYSTEMS, DIGITAL DIVIDE AND TRANSIT INEQUITY: A STUDY OF THE TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION’S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRESTO SYSTEM by Masooma Ali Honours Bachelor of Arts, University of Toronto, 2016 A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning in the Program of Urban Development Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2020 © Masooma Ali 2020 SMART PAYMENT SYSTEMS, DIGITAL DIVIDE AND TRANSIT INEQUITY ii SMART PAYMENT SYSTEMS, DIGITAL DIVIDE AND TRANSIT INEQUITY AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A MRP I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. iii SMART PAYMENT SYSTEMS, DIGITAL DIVIDE AND TRANSIT INEQUITY Smart Payment Systems, Digital Divide and Transit Inequity: A Study of the Toronto Transit Commission’s Implementation of the PRESTO System © Masooma Ali 2020 Master of Planning in the Program of Urban Development ABSTRACT Toronto is city divided. The city’s public transportation system is not an exception to this pattern. A move away from tokens, tickets, passes and cash and towards smart technology and modernization is excluding a large population of Torontonians who rely on public transportation but lack resources, face limited connectivity and rely on fare subsidy programs and traditional methods of fare payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Region!
    The Pickering 48 PAGES ✦ Pressrun 48,900 ✦ Metroland Durham Region Media Group ✦ FRIDAY, APRIL 27, 2007 ✦ Optional delivery $6 / Newsstand $1 Ajax-Pickering Rock is ready to roll LACROSSE TEAM DRAWS TWO TOUGH GAMES TO START 2007 SEASON PAGE 33 Passersby link arms in effort to save driver from drowning By Jeff Mitchell [email protected] CLAREMONT — A group of strangers linked arms and plunged into a freezing pond in a dramatic effort to try and save a man whose pickup flew off a rural road and over- turned Wednes- For more day evening. on this story Durham police are praising the efforts of the dozen or so citizens, including two firefighters and a child care worker, who formed a human chain that extended into the water as they retrieved the ✦ See Truck, Page 5 Jason Liebregts/News Advertiser photo Auf Wiedersehen, sucka. Ajax High School students including Kate Galna, left, and Emily Ward participated in ‘The Day of Silence’, a student-led day of action to recognize those lesbian, The GTI Mk V. Pre-tuned in Deutschland. gay, bisexual and transgender individuals forced into silence and cannot speak their ‘truth’ due to harassment, prejudice and discrimination. The original hot hatch is here, and it’s spec’d for ‘07 with a turbocharged 200 hp 2.0-litre engine, sport suspension, a DSG ® ‘07 Students’ silence a show of support with Tiptronic and paddle shifting. GTI Pickering Volkswagen Inc. Event promotes than 100 people at Ajax High has a negative connotation and is because it would have conflicted 503 Kingston Rd.
    [Show full text]