DOCSLIB.ORG

Higher-Order Transit Strategy Development Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Higher-Order Transit Strategy Development Report If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 ext. 3753 Background Report Durham Region TMP Higher-Order Transit Strategy Development Report Prepared for The Regional Municipality of Durham by IBI Group and Parsons January 2018 IBI GROUP Background Report Durham Region TMP Higher-Order Transit STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT REPORT Prepared for The Regional Municipality of Durham Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Transportation Directions .................................................................. 1 1.3 Transit Network Development Approach .......................................... 3 1.4 Report Structure ............................................................................... 4 2 Current Plans ............................................................................................. 5 2.1 Regional Official Plan ....................................................................... 5 2.2 Long Term Transit Strategy .............................................................. 6 2.3 DRT Five Year Service Strategy ....................................................... 6 2.4 Provincial Initiatives .......................................................................... 7 3 Background ............................................................................................... 9 3.1 Existing Transit Network ................................................................... 9 3.2 Travel Demand Trends ................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Transit Mode Share ......................................................................11 3.2.2 Transit Trip Destinations ...............................................................12 3.2.3 Density and Transit ......................................................................13 3.3 Transit Service Performance .......................................................... 14 3.4 Transit Access to GO Stations ........................................................ 17 3.5 Summary and Implications for Transit Network Development ........ 17 4 Future Transportation Needs and Opportunities ................................. 18 4.1 Population and Employment Growth .............................................. 18 4.2 Transit Travel Demand Growth ....................................................... 19 4.2.1 2031 Travel Demand ....................................................................19 4.3 Changes in Travel Patterns ............................................................ 20 4.4 Role of Transit in Addressing Travel Demand ................................ 22 January 2018 i IBI GROUP Background Report Durham Region TMP Higher-Order Transit Strategy Development Report Prepared for The Regional Municipality of Durham Table of Contents (continued) 5 Development of the 2031 Transit Network ............................................ 23 5.1 Principles for Transit Network Development ................................... 23 5.1.1 Transit Measures..........................................................................23 5.1.2 Transit Options .............................................................................26 5.1.3 Matching Demand to Service .......................................................29 5.1.4 Thresholds for Rapid Transit ........................................................30 5.2 High Level Network Alternatives ..................................................... 31 5.2.1 Base Network ...............................................................................32 5.2.2 Enhanced Network .......................................................................32 5.3 Comparison of Base and Enhanced Networks ............................... 33 6 Proposed 2031 Transit Network ............................................................. 35 6.1 Assessment Considerations ........................................................... 35 6.2 Transit Corridor Assessments ........................................................ 42 6.2.1 Highway 2 ....................................................................................42 6.2.2 Simcoe Street ...............................................................................48 6.2.3 Taunton Road ..............................................................................54 6.2.4 Whites Road .................................................................................56 6.2.5 Brock Road ..................................................................................57 6.2.6 Westney Road ..............................................................................59 6.2.7 Bayly Street / Victoria Street / Bloor Street ...................................61 6.2.8 Other High Frequency Corridors ...................................................63 6.3 GO Transit ...................................................................................... 67 6.3.1 Lakeshore East Corridor...............................................................68 6.3.2 Seaton GO Rail ............................................................................69 6.3.3 GO Rail Extension to Uxbridge .....................................................71 6.3.4 Future Service on the Havelock Subdivision .................................71 January 2018 ii IBI GROUP Background Report Durham Region TMP Higher-Order Transit Strategy Development Report Prepared for The Regional Municipality of Durham Table of Contents (continued) 6.3.5 Future Protection for High Speed Rail ..........................................72 7 Transit Needs Beyond 2031 ................................................................... 73 7.1 Population and Employment Forecasts .......................................... 73 7.2 Transportation Demand and Network Implications ......................... 74 7.3 Recommendations Beyond 2031 .................................................... 74 8 Rapid Transit Costs ................................................................................ 75 8.1 Capital Cost .................................................................................... 75 List Of Exhibits Exhibit 1.1: Transportation Directions ................................................................. 2 Exhibit 3.1: Existing Transit Network in Durham Region (2017) ....................... 10 Exhibit 3.2: Mode Share Comparisons for AM Peak Period Trips from Durham, 2001-2011 ..................................................................................... 11 Exhibit 3.3: Transit Mode Share by Municipality for AM Peak Period, 2001- 2011 .............................................................................................. 11 Exhibit 3.4: Transit Trips Starting in Durham – AM Peak Period ...................... 12 Exhibit 3.5: Comparison of Urban Densities and Transit Mode Shares in Urban Growth Centres in 2001 ................................................................. 13 Exhibit 3.6: Density and Transit Mode Share – AM Peak Period ...................... 14 Exhibit 3.7: DRT Historical Ridership (millions) ................................................ 15 Exhibit 3.8: Monthly Bus Boardings in Durham Region (2015) ......................... 16 Exhibit 3.9: Access Mode to GO Rail ................................................................ 17 Exhibit 4.1: Development Growth by Municipality (Model Forecasts) ................ 19 January 2018 iii IBI GROUP Background Report Durham Region TMP Higher-Order Transit Strategy Development Report Prepared for The Regional Municipality of Durham Table of Contents (continued) Exhibit 4.2: Peak Period Growth in Transit Demand ......................................... 20 Exhibit 4.3: Transit Trips Starting in Durham Region by Destination – AM Peak Period ............................................................................................ 21 Exhibit 4.4: Transit Share by Trip Destination – AM Peak Period ..................... 21 Exhibit 5.1: Characteristics of On-Street, Fully Segregated and Grade Separated Transit Options ............................................................. 28 Exhibit 5.2: Carrying Capacity .......................................................................... 31 Exhibit 5.3: 2031 Base Network Assumptions .................................................. 32 Exhibit 5.4: Enhanced Network Assumptions ................................................... 33 Exhibit 5.5: High-level Summary of Model Results – AM Peak Period ............. 34 Exhibit 5.6: High-level Summary of Model Results – PM Peak Period ............. 34 Exhibit 6.1: Regional Transit Network Types .................................................... 36 Exhibit 6.2: Specific Designation for Key Regional Transit Corridors ............... 38 Exhibit 6.3: Recommended Higher-Order Transit Network ............................... 40 Exhibit 6.4: Recommended Higher-Order Transit Network (South Enlargement) ................................................................................. 41 Exhibit 6.5: Highway 2 Corridor Features ......................................................... 44 Exhibit 6.6: Potential Highway 2 Corridor Cross-sections to 2031 .................... 45 Exhibit 6.7: Proposed Highway 2 Corridor Cross-sections beyond 2031 .......... 47 Exhibit 6.8: Simcoe Street Corridor Features ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • York Region Transit
    The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York Jonathan English Columbia University CUTA Conference May 2016 Introduction • Is density the most important determinant of transit system success? • Can transit be successful in areas with relatively low density and a suburban built form? • Do service increases and reductions affect ridership? • The goal is to find natural experiments that can answer these questions The Region Source: Wikimedia The Comparison York Region Transit Brampton Transit • Focused expansion on • Developed grid network major corridors, of high-service bus including pioneering routes Viva BRT • Tailored service to demand on secondary corridors High Frequency Routes York Brampton Green = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Grey = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Source: Public Schedules and Google Earth Principal Findings • Increased service improves ridership performance • “Network effect” means that comprehensive network of high-service routes, rather than focus on select corridors, produces largest ridership gains • Well-designed service improvements can be undertaken while maintaining stable fare recovery Brampton vs York Service 1.8 1.6 1.4 /Capita 1.2 1 0.8 Kilometres 0.6 0.4 Vehicle 0.2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 York Brampton Source: CUTA Fact Book Brampton vs York Ridership 40 35 Brampton: +57.7% 30 25 20 15 Riders/Capita 10 York: +29.7% 5 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Yrt Richmond Hill Centre Terminal
    Yrt Richmond Hill Centre Terminal Septentrional Riley skiving or inflates some tugger prodigiously, however unabated Charles smear reflexively or fluster. Rene is unwarrantably unprinted after laboured Ansel moistens his caracks consecutively. Unrotten Daryle usually albumenize some volutions or oppose ruddy. Vaughan centre terminal located near york university. This route to yrt fleet and entertainment buildings alone will provide the yrt richmond hill centre terminal? It more take yourself few minutes for new drives to appear. Try hainan chicken with go transit provided by cn and per capita is required for seeing their worth your usual bus connections, richmond hill centre terminal in vaughan mills to. The terminal is still has the yrt richmond hill centre terminal. Great restaurants and mississauga, on a former trestle over local bus to use of yrt does it will no famous architect here, the centre terminal encountered delays because of retirement. Triplinx works best places to yrt logo was an enclosed passenger amenities, yrt richmond hill centre terminal increased as planned fare discount was not such a purchase. Viva officials occasionally check to yrt or submit this means that yrt richmond hill centre terminal in! Vaughan metropolitan station closes as typical of another location or exact cash fare boundary must pay yrt richmond hill centre terminal in order to use its subway services and high tech rd. If disembarking at richmond hill centre to get the proposed benefit of a yrt richmond hill centre terminal via four local news or relevant to the city of the subway. This bus passengers as richmond hill centre terminal in richmond hill centre is a transit continues to all passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project
    9.8 Date: May 25, 2021 Originator’s files: To: Chair and Members of General Committee From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works June 9, 2021 Subject Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project Recommendation 1. That the report to General Committee entitled “Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project” dated May 25, 2021 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works be received for information. 2. That Phase 1 of the Service Integration Pilot Project recommendations for enhanced cross-boundary travel be received for information. Executive Summary The Ministry of Transportation has convened a Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table that includes representatives of all transit agencies and aims to improve connections and the customer experience for inter-municipal transit travel. The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) has engaged a consultant team to develop an agency-driven FSI model to present to the Provincial-Municipal Table in partnership with surrounding transit agencies including MiWay. Currently MiWay, along with several other 905 agencies, are prohibited from providing local service within City of Toronto, resulting in TTC providing duplicate service for their residents. In addition, transit fares are not integrated between the TTC and MiWay. In partnership with the TTC, the Burnhamthorpe Road corridor has been selected for a transit service integration pilot project in the near-term (targeting fall 2021). 9.8 General Committee 2021/05/25 2 Background For decades, transit service integration has been discussed and studied in the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA). The Ministry of Transportation’s newly convened Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table consists of senior representatives from transit systems within the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA) and the broader GO Transit service area.
    [Show full text]
  • York Region Transit Downsview Subway Station and Busway Agreement
    Report No. 7 of the Transit Committee Regional Council Meeting of June 25, 2009 4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DOWNSVIEW SUBWAY STATION AND BUSWAY AGREEMENT The Transportation and Works Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated June 4, 2009, from the Commissioner of Transportation Services. 1. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that: 1. The existing agreement between The Regional Municipality of York and the Toronto Transit Commission to permit York Region Transit/Viva access to the Downsview subway station bus terminal be extended for an additional five-year term and also be amended to include use of the York University busway, as well as other administrative amendments as outlined in this report. 2. The Regional Chair and Regional Clerk be authorized to sign the necessary agreements, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the Commissioner of Transportation Services, and the approval of Legal Services as to form and content. 2. PURPOSE This report seeks authorization for the renewal of the current agreement between the Regional Municipality of York and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) with respect to the use of the Downsview subway station bus terminal. The amended agreement would continue to permit York Region Transit (YRT)/Viva buses to access the TTC bus terminal at the Downsview subway station for the purpose of servicing passengers who use the Spadina subway line. The report also seeks authorization to amend the agreement with the TTC for use of the new York University busway, as well as to facilitate other administrative adjustments. 3. BACKGROUND Viva Orange service was implemented in late 2005 with approximately 176 daily trips connecting with the TTC’s Downsview subway bus terminal, via York University, from Vaughan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of 40 Cities: a Preliminary Analysis of Equity Impacts of COVID-19 Service Adjustments Across North America July 2020 Mc
    A tale of 40 cities: A preliminary analysis of equity impacts of COVID-19 service adjustments across North America James DeWeese, Leila Hawa, Hanna Demyk, Zane Davey, Anastasia Belikow, and Ahmed El-Geneidy July 2020 McGill University Abstract To cope with COVID-19 confinement measures and precipitous declines in ridership, public transport agencies across North America have made significant adjustments to their services, slashing trip frequency in many areas while increasing it in others. These adjustments, especially service cuts, appear to have disproportionately affected areas where lower income and more- vulnerable groups reside in North American Cities. This paper compares changes in service frequency across 30 U.S. and 10 Canadian cities, linking these changes to average income levels and a vulnerability index. The study highlights the wide range of service outcomes while underscoring the potential for best practices that explicitly account for vertical equity, or social justice, in their impacts when adjusting service levels. Research Question and Data Public transport ridership in North American Cities declined dramatically by the end of March 2020 as governments applied confinement measures in response to COVID-19 pandemic (Hart, 2020; Vijaya, 2020). In an industry that depends heavily on fare-box recovery to pay for operations and sometimes infrastructure loans (Verbich, Badami, & El-Geneidy, 2017), transport agencies faced major financial strains, even as the pandemic magnified their role as a critical public service, ferrying essential, often low-income, workers with limited alternatives to their jobs (Deng, Morissette, & Messacar, 2020). Public transport agencies also faced major operating difficulties due to absenteeism among operators (Hamilton Spectator, 2020) and enhanced cleaning protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Agency Responses to COVID-19: a Review of Challenges and Opportunities for Continued Service Delivery
    Transit Agency Responses to COVID-19: A review of challenges and opportunities for continued service delivery By: Ellen McGowan April 2021 School of Urban and Regional Planning Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Supervisor: Dr. Ajay Agarwal Copyright © Ellen McGowan 2021 Acknowledgements I would first like to acknowledge my supervisor, Dr. Ajay Agarwal, whose expertise was invaluable in formulating the research questions and methodology. Thank you for your support and generosity over the last two years. I would like to thank the Norman D. Wilson Fellowship for funding this research. I would also like to thank my parents and Mark for their endless encouragement. Finally, I could not have completed this report without the support of my friends at SURP. Although our time together was cut short, I’m grateful for all that first year brought us. 2 Executive Summary Background & Context The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has radically impacted public transport ridership and service provision across the country. Since the outbreak of the virus, transit agencies have had to adapt to new and rapidly evolving conditions. Many agencies modified services to reflect lower ridership levels and to ensure the safety of both riders and operators. These changes in service were guided by public health agencies, as well as major transit associations like the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) and International Association of Public Transport (UITP). Other agencies implemented precautionary measures like rear door boarding, temporary fare suspension, and reduced capacity limits to enable the safe continuity of operations. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, transit agencies are having to strike a balance between providing enough transportation options for essential travel and reducing service offerings to match the declining overall demand for mobility services.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Triplinx - an Integrated View of Regional Transit
    Triplinx - An Integrated View of Regional Transit Robert Proctor, Diane Kolin ITS Canada February 13, 2017 Triplinx Overview • Background • Features • Strategy • Partnerships • Challenges and Lessons Learned • Future Growth and Innovation 2 Metrolinx Metrolinx, an agency of the Government of Ontario under the Metrolinx Act, 2006, was created to improve the coordination and integration of all modes of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. The organization’s mission is to champion, develop and implement an integrated transportation system for our region that enhances prosperity, sustainability and quality of life. The Metrolinx Vision: Working together to transform the way the region moves The Metrolinx Mission: To champion and deliver mobility solutions for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area 3 The Need for Triplinx Metrolinx is responsible for planning and coordination of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area Context of the Triplinx initiative: • 11 public transit systems including regional transit (GO Transit) and the UP Express airport service • Each has its own customer information system- of varying maturity Background: • Low public awareness of the amount and quality of transit service • Regional growth is increasing the amount of regional travel involving more than one transit system There was a critical need for: • A one-stop source of transit information • Presentation of all available services as one integrated network 4 The Need for Triplinx • Utilized for the PanAm and Para PanAm games in 2015 – Sporting venues, supplementary services to assist ticket purchasers • A key strategic tool for customer service transit ridership development – Flexible management of multi-agency transit service data – One-stop customer information serving entire travel experience • North American systems, generally: – Blend in-house and third party products.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PRESTO Contactless Terms and Conditions
    PRESTO CONTACTLESS TERMS & CONDITIONS VERSION 1.1 EFFECTIVE March 10, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is the agreement between you and the PRESTO Service (“PRESTO”) operated through and by Metrolinx, a Crown Agency within the meaning of the Crown Agency Act (Ontario) (“Metrolinx”), for the use of contactless payment media (described below) (the “Terms and Conditions”). For the purposes of these Terms & Conditions and the other documents or agreements incorporated by reference herein or which incorporate these Terms & Conditions by reference therein, the term “PRESTO contactless” means the use by you of a contactless payment media to pay a transit fare on a participating Transit Agency and the services offered by PRESTO in connection with your use of contactless payment media including, but not limited to, use of the PRESTO website (as defined below) and the PRESTO Contact Centre (as defined below). Definitions: In these Terms and Conditions, the user of the PRESTO contactless service is referred to as “you” or “your”; PRESTO is referred to as “PRESTO”, “we”, “our” or “us”; “Transit Agency” refers to GO Transit, Brampton Transit, Burlington Transit, Durham Region Transit, Hamilton Street Railway Company, MiWay (Mississauga), Oakville Transit, Toronto Transit Commission, Union-Pearson Express, York Region Transit, OC Transpo (Ottawa), if it accepts PRESTO contactless, and any other transit agency that accepts payment for its services by way of the PRESTO contactless service that may be added from time to time, and “Transit Agency” refers to any one of them. These Terms & Conditions apply to you when you are using PRESTO contactless to pay your transit fare using contactless payment media on any Transit Agency, and sets out your rights and obligations when using PRESTO contactless.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESTO Update Metrolinx Board
    Tap into an easier commute. Tap into PRESTO Update Metrolinx Board September 15, 2011 1 Summary Modules 1. Introduction P. 3 2. Project Scope P. 5 3. Project Status P. 7 4. Future Direction P. 11 5. OC Transpo View P. 14 6. TTC View P. 16 7. Contact P. 18 2 Introduction 3 What is PRESTO? PRESTO is a centralized provincial e-Fare system based on smartcard technology, providing fare collection, settlement services and information management in Southern and Eastern Ontario Mission: “To provide e -Transit fare and information management systems that improve client service while enabling revenue collection and efficient operations for Ontario Transit Agencies” 4 Project Scope 5 Baseline Scope PRESTO scope as of April 1st, 2006 • 8 transit service pp()providers (SP) were in scope for PRESTO ( ‘905” area) ¾ Brampton Transit, Burlington Transit, Durham Region Transit, GO Transit, Hamilton Street Railway (HSR), MiWay (Mississauga Transit), Oakville Transit, York Region Transit • The original contract with Accenture (10 years), let through Provincial public tender in 2006, encompassed the build, design and operation of the PRESTO System through 2016 at an initial value of $250M. • Municipal SP costs were shared by the Province (1/3) and municipalities (2/3). 6 Project Status 7 Implementation Status Municipal Service Provider Rollout (May 2010 - August 2011): • GTHA delivery complete, including additional installations: ¾ GO bus fleet, TTC (12 subway stations), St. Catharines & Niagara VIA Stations, 3 new garages, new stations, 150 new buses • PRESTO
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report 2016
    Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the efforts of former Metrolinx Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) members Mr. Sean Henry and Mr. Brian Moore, both of whom stepped down from the AAC in 2016. They provided valuable input into our accessibility planning efforts. We would like to welcome Mr. Gordon Ryall and Ms. Heather Willis, who both joined the Metrolinx AAC in 2015. Lastly, we would like to thank all of the Metrolinx AAC members for the important work they do as volunteers to improve the accessibility of our services. Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report: 2016 1. Introduction The 2016 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report provides an annual update of the Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan published in December 2012, as well as the 2015 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report. Metrolinx, a Crown agency of the Province of Ontario under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation, has three operating divisions: GO Transit, PRESTO and Union Pearson Express. This Status Report, in conjunction with the December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, fulfills Metrolinx’s legal obligations for 2016 under the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (ODA), to publish an annual accessibility plan; and also under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), to publish an annual status report on its multi-year plan. The December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and other accessibility planning documents can be referenced on the Metrolinx website at the following link: www.metrolinx.com/en/aboutus/accessibility/default.aspx. In accordance with the AODA, it must be updated every five years. Metrolinx, including its operating divisions, remains committed to proceeding with plans to ensure AODA compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • @280-350 Harwood Avenue South Ajax, ON
    For More Information Contact: *Sales Representative Samantha Sukumar* Associate Vice President 416 495 6252 [email protected] Kathryn Schubert Sales Representative 416 798 6234 [email protected] Kristine Macatangay Sales Representative 416 798 6283 [email protected] harwood plaza @280-350 Harwood Avenue South Ajax, ON availabilities Spaces: Suite 200: 20,859 sq. ft. (divisible) Suite 204: 3,357 sq. ft. Net Rent: $8.50 per sq. ft. office suites Additional Rent: $13.73 per sq. ft. (2019 Est.) for lease CBRE Limited, Brokerage | 5935 Airport Road, Suite 700 Mississauga, ON L4V 1W5 | www.cbre.ca harwood plaza // 280-350 harwood avenue south // ajax, ontario floor plan: Suite 200: 20,859 sq. ft. (divisible) harwood plaza // 280-350 harwood avenue south // ajax, ontario floor plan: Suite 204: 3,357 sq. ft. harwood plaza // 280-350 harwood avenue south // ajax, ontario on-site amenities: public transit: • A&W • Mucho Burrito • Rental City Serviced by Durham Region Transit • Booster Juice • One Nails Pro • Scotiabank • Dollarama • Pita Land • Shoppers Drug Mart • Route 216: Harwood North* • Route 224: Harwood-Salem* • Factory Direct • Pizza Pizza • Subway • Route 223: Bayly* • Routes 291 & 292: Ajax Community Routes • Food Basics • Popeyes • Tim Hortons • Good Life Fitness • RBC Bank * Connects to Ajax GO Station (2.6 kms) (With connections to the Oshawa GO Station/Via Rail Station) * Connects to Pickering GO Station (5.8 kms) HUNT ST BAYLY ST WEST SITE COMMERCIAL AVE HARWOOD AVE SOUTH For More Information Contact: *Sales Representative Samantha Sukumar* Kathryn Schubert Kristine Macatangay Associate Vice President Sales Representative Sales Representative 416 495 6252 416 798 6234 416 798 6283 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] CBRE Limited, Brokerage | 5935 Airport Road | Suite 700 | Mississauga, ON | L4V 1W5 | www.cbre.ca This disclaimer shall apply to CBRE Limited, Real Estate Brokerage, and to all other divisions of the Corporation (“CBRE”).
    [Show full text]