Political Monitor No.21
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dooplaya Field Report: a Quasi-Ceasefire? Developments After the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, from January To
(i) The Dooplaya Field Report: A quasi-ceasefire? Developments after the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, from January to December 2016 th August 19 , 2017 Field Report August19, 2017 / KHRG #17-1-F1 Dooplaya Field Report: January to December 2016 This field report provides the analysis of the regional situation in Dooplaya District, southeast Myanmar, between January and December 2016. It includes information submitted by KHRG community members on a range of human rights violations and other issues including the military situation and ceasefire concerns, violent abuse, drug usage, development projects, land issues, health and education, and refugee issues. • According to the information listed in a number of reports, during 2016 villagers in Dooplaya District are still concerned about the military situation due to the resurgence of military movement and on-going fighting between the Tatmadaw and Karen ethnic armed groups after the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement [NCA]. Villager’s trust in the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) has decreased since the signing of the NCA. • In terms of the human rights situation in Dooplaya District, villagers are still facing a lack of justice when they experience violent abuse such as torture, rape and killing. The information received highlighted that villagers need more knowledge and awareness on human rights issues given by organisations such as KHRG in order to protect themselves. • Regarding drugs, villagers reported in numbers of situation updates that the illegal trade in yaba [methamphetamine] has rapidly increased in all townships of Dooplaya District; consequently there have been negative social impacts. Many young people, including children and married women became addicted to yaba and they are no longer interested in their education or working for their livelihood which creates burdens for their family. -
The Situation in Karen State After the Elections PAPER No
EBO ANALYSIS The Situation in Karen State after the Elections PAPER No. 1 2011 THE SITUATION IN KAREN STATE AFTER THE ELECTIONS EBO Analysis Paper No. 1/2011 For over sixty years the Karens have been fighting the longest civil war in recent history. The struggle, which has seen demands for an autonomous state changed to equal recognition within a federal union, has been bloody and characterized by a number of splits within the movement. While all splinter groups ostensibly split to further ethnic Karen aspirations; recent decisions by some to join the Burmese government’s Border Guard Force (BGF) is seen as an end to such aspirations. Although a number of Karen political parties were formed to contest the November elections, the likelihood of such parties seriously securing appropriate ethnic representation without regime capitulation is doubtful. While some have argued, perhaps correctly, that the only legitimate option was to contest the elections, the closeness of some Karen representatives to the current regime can only prolong the status quo. This papers examines the problems currently affecting Karen State after the 7 November elections. THE BORDER GUARD FORCE Despite original promises of being allowed to recruit a total of 9,000 troops, the actual number of the DKBA (Democratic Karen Buddhist Army) or Karen Border Guard Force has been reduced considerably. In fact, a number of the original offers made to the DKBA have been revoked. At a 7 May 2010 meeting held at Myaing Gyi Ngu, DKBA Chairman U Tha Htoo Kyaw stated that ‘According to the SE Commander, the BGF will retain the DKBA badge.’ In fact the DKBA were given uniforms with SPDC military patches and all Karen flags in DKBA areas were removed and replaced by the national flag. -
Read the WASH Assessment
WASH ASSESSMENT Kayin, Myanmar From august 19th to 31th 2019 / Report date: September 6th 2019 Authors: Timothée LE GUELLEC (PUI), Thomas Monnet, Loïc Bruckert (Aquassistance) SOMMAIRE Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………................................. 1 Context……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………... 1 General context………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… 1 Mission scope …………………………………………………………………………………….…………................ 2 Main findings……………………………………………….…………………………………………………….……... 3 Access to water, sanitation and hygiene…………..……………………………………………………….……… 3 Governance……………………………………….………….…………………………………………………… 3 Water availability…………………………………………….………………………………………………….… 4 Water quality…………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 5 Sanitation and hygiene…………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 WaSH in Schools………………………………………………..…………………………………….……….… 8 WaSH in health care facilities…………………………………………………………………….……………… 9 WaSH in camps……………………………………………………………………………………………………10 Logistics and market……………………………………………………………………………………………..……. 11 Equipment and material………………………………………………………………………………..………… 11 Services providers…………………………………………………………………………………………………11 Roads conditions and transportation…………………………………………………………….………………11 Constraints and opportunities……………………………………………………………………...…………………11 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 Long term WaSH strategy…………………………………………………………………………………...…………12 Foster coordination between state and non-state actors………………………………………………………12 Improve and monitor water quality…………………………………………………………………………….…12 -
Clearing the Way for The
Vol. III, No. 154, 1st Waning of Tawthalin 1378 ME www.globalnewlightofmyanmar.com Saturday, 17 September 2016 Peace makers Pyithu Hluttaw records Negotiations being discuss national- proposal related to made among authorities e-government system to set up new industrial level political zones nationwide implementation dialogues PAGE 3 PAGE 2 PAGE 5 CLEARING THE WAY FOR THE USA State Counsellor invites investment after Obama pledges to lift sanctions FOLLOWING US President said that lifting sanctions involved economic and financial sanctions grows healthily and sustainably business practices and responsible Barack Obama’s pledge to lift a political risk and economic risk were first imposed on the country into a developed economic system, government practices.” she added. sanctions against Myanmar, State in some ways, but added that “It is after he met and discussed these urging investors to help the coun- Before the dinner, the State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu time now for our people to depend issues with the State Counsellor try to build up business that is free Counsellor held talks with US Kyi called on US business com- on themselves, to go forward with during her first visit to the United from corruption. Secretary of Commerce Ms Penny munities yesterday to invest in the help of our friends.” States in her new capacity. “We need investment from Pritzker on the promotion of bilat- Myanmar. President Obama announced Daw Aung San Suu Kyi invit- those who are prepared to work eral trade and investment and the Speaking at a dinner hosted by his intent to terminate the Nation- ed American companies to make with us in the battle against corrup- potential for cooperation between the US-ASEAN Business Council al Emergency status with respect investments in the country to en- tion,” she said. -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 2 Political context ........................................................................................................................ 3 The Democratic Kayin Buddhist Organization ........................................................... 3 Attacks by the DKBA and the SLORC on Karen refugees ................................................... 6 Abduction and forcible return ................................................................................................. 6 Incidents prior to February 1995 ............................................................................................ 8 Initial incursions and abductions - early February 1995 ......................................................... 9 Abductions of KNU Officials and camp administrators ...................................................... 10 Abduction of Phado Mahn Yin Sein and Win Sein; possible extrajudicial killing of Jeffrey Win ....................................................................................... 11 Abduction of Sein Tun and Hti Law Paw ............................................................................ 12 Abduction of “Uncle Jolly”.................................................................................................... 13 -
Spiritual Protection, Justice, and Religious Tensions in the Karen State.1 Mikael Gravers
A Saint in Command? Spiritual Protection, Justice, and Religious Tensions in the Karen State.1 Mikael Gravers Abstract In 1995, when the Myaing Gyi Ngu Sayadaw, U Thuzana, split the KNU and formed the DKBA, he was considered a stooge of the Myanmar army. However, the monk had a vision and a prophecy of revitalizing a Karen Buddhist land, protect his followers, and uniting all Karens. This article analyses his strategy and events since 1995. It is argued that he organized a theocratic trust net- work and provided protection and justice during the conflict. In recent years his activities have created religious tensions and conflicts. This is related to the general situation in Myanmar where religious identity and nationalism dominates politics. It is argued that religious interventions may create problems for the peace process as well as for democratization and a common law. 1The author conducted fieldwork in Karen State during February and March 2017 together with anthropologist Anders Baltzer Jørgensen, Saw Say Wah and Saw Eh Dah whose assistance was invaluable. The author has visited Myaing Gyi Ngu in 2012, 2013 and 2014. In 2017, the authorities denied us access due to ongoing fighting. In 1996, the author interviewed Karen refugees in Thailand who fled from DKBA. He has also interviewed followers of the monk in Thai- land along the border, as well as in Chiang Mai and Lamphun. Last, but not least, the work on this subject owes a lot to Tim Schroeder who has accompa- nied the author and shared his knowledge. 2 | Gravers စာတမ်းအကျး -
Ceasefires, Governance and Development: the Karen National
Ceasefires, Governance, and Development: The Karen National Union in Times of Change Kim Jolliffe December 2016 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the many individuals in the Karen National Union, Karen community based organizations, and other Karen armed organizations who contributed their time, knowledge and encouragement to make this study possible. In particular, this work was inspired by the impressive and diverse Karen social service and humanitarian networks that work tirelessly every day to support communities affected by war. Significant parts of this research would not have been possible without support from the Karen Environmental Social Action Network, which works for rural livelihoods and environmental security of indigenous Karen people. This study benefited greatly from the more than two decade’s worth of testimony from rural Karen civilians collected by the Karen Human Rights Group, which remains a crucial and extraordinary resource to any research on these conflicts. This work was improved immeasurably by input from Brian McCartan, Tim Schroeder, Ashley South, Paul Keenan, and Jared Bissinger, which included feedback on drafts and various published and unpublished materials. Encouragement and dialogue with multiple other Myanmar and international researchers and professionals were also highly valuable. This series of papers has been built on the firm foundations of the broader research program initiated and developed by The Asia Foundation’s Matthew Arnold, among other key individuals. It has been made possible by the tireless production, administrative and editorial work of Mim Koletschka, Win Po Po Aung and the rest of their team. About the Author Kim Jolliffe is an independent researcher, writer, analyst and trainer, specializing in security, aid policy, and ethnic politics in Myanmar/Burma. -
Dooplaya Situation Update: Win Yay and Kyainseikgyi Townships, June and August 2017
Situation Update February 9, 2018 / KHRG #17-96-S1 Dooplaya Situation Update: Win Yay and Kyainseikgyi Townships, June and August 2017 This Situation Update describes events occurring in Win Yay Township and Kyainseikgyi Township Dooplaya District during the period between June and August 2017, including Tatmadaw activity, education, healthcare, development projects, land confiscation and recently returned IDPs and refugees. • In June 2017, Tatmadaw Infantry Battalion (IB) #283, IB #31, local business people and a Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) company commander from Battalion #17 conducted logging in community forests in violation of village rules. • Tatmadaw Light Infantry Battalion (LIB) #406 was quartered at a monastery and a house in P--- village Kyainseikgyi Township. P--- villagers submitted a complaint letter to the Karen National Union (KNU) District office in opposition to the Tatmadaw quartering but no response has been received. • Many schools in Win Yay Township face challenges such as a shortage of available school teachers, a reduction in financial support for some schools, and a lack of accountability for the performance of some Burma/Myanmar government teachers. • Villagers whose land was damaged by road construction for the Than Phyu Zayet-Three Pagodas Pass road have not received compensation and feel that the overall road construction process lacks transparency. • One major challenge villagers faced in Win Yay Township is land confiscation by the Burma/Myanmar government and by the Tatmadaw. Without access to land, villagers have difficulty securing their livelihoods. • Internally Displaced Peoples (IDPs) and refugees who relocated to an area with houses constructed by the Nippon Foundation faced difficulties accessing water, education, healthcare and were concerned about their security. -
Briefing Note Developments in South East Myanmar 7 April 2021
Briefing Note Developments in South East Myanmar 7 April 2021 (Limited Distribution) Major Developments and Security Incidents Clashes between the Myanmar Armed Forces (MAF) and the Karen National Union (KNU) have intensified over the past fortnight in many parts of southeastern Myanmar. The rapid deterioration of the security situation can be traced back to events on 27 March 2021 when a dawn raid by the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) of the Karen National Union (KNU) on a MAF military base in the Thee Muh Hta area of Hpapun Township, Kayin State took place. Tensions between the MAF and KNU/KNLA had been high prior to the attack and the dawn raid was carried out in response to continuous indiscriminate mortar shelling by MAF in the surrounding areas. The MAF subsequently responded with retaliatory airstrikes on the same day targeting the headquarters of the KNU/KNLA’s Brigade 5 in Day Bpoo Noh. The airstrikes resulted in the displacement of thousands of civilians, about 100 of which crossed the border into Mae Hong Son Province of Thailand to seek shelter. Armed conflict in the area intensified in the days that followed with additional airstrikes launched by the MAF on 28, 29, 30 and 31 March 2021, targeting key sites in territory under the control of KNU/KNLA in Hpapun Township, Kayin State and Kyaukkyi Township, Bago Region. The airstrikes constitute the most significant attack on the region in years and triggered an outflow of over 3,800 persons into Thailand between 27 and 29 March 2021. The majority have since returned to their places of origin while figures from the Royal Thai Government indicate that some 1,100 persons remain in Thailand as of 1 April 2021. -
An Assessment of Business Opportunities in the Kayin State
PeaceNexus Foundation An assessment of business opportunities in the Kayin state Vriens & Partners 01 November 2013 1 Business Opportunities in Kayin State – PeaceNexus Foundation Foreword In the spring of 2013, PeaceNexus was approached by the Government of Myanmar via the Myanmar Peace Center to support the Karen National Union (KNU) in the identification of business opportunities that benefit the local population in the Kayin State. In the belief that inclusive and responsible business can help consolidate the ongoing peace process, PeaceNexus has offered its assistance to this endeavour. In a first phase, PeaceNexus has commissioned Vriens & Partners to conduct a market research study to identify key actors, ongoing business activities and recommendations about potential projects for other organisations to support in key sectors and areas. Disclaimer This report is based on the research and analysis of Vriens & Partners. It is intended for information purposes only. About PeaceNexus PeaceNexus is an independent private Swiss foundation whose mission is to promote integrated solutions to peacebuilding challenges with emphasis on the interfaces between development, democracy and security. 2 Business Opportunities in Kayin State – PeaceNexus Foundation i. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 ii. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ -
Kayin IAC Group
Kayin IAC Group Briefing Note Developments in South East Myanmar 30 April 2021 (Limited Distribution) Major Developments and Security Incidents Clashes between the Myanmar Armed Forces (MAF) and the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) of the Karen National Union (KNU) continued during the week in the South East of Myanmar, particularly in Kayin and Mon States. In Kayin State, the KNU/KNLA Brigade 5 seized an MAF base in Thaw Ler Hta in Hpapun Township near the border with Thailand on 27 April 2021.1 Reportedly, at least three soldiers were killed and two were injured from the KNU side during the seizure.2 Following the attack, the MAF staged airstrikes in KNU/KNLA controlled areas on 27 and 28 April 2021. 3 The airstrikes were reported from Bwa Der, Dar Gwin and Thaw Le Hta in Hpapun Townships. Armed clashes continue to spread beyond traditional conflict zones, particularly in Mon State over the past weeks where the MAF has increased its presence in the area. Clashes between the MAF and KNU/KNLA were reported at Shwe Yaung Pya area in Bilin Township, Mon State on 23 April 2021. Three members of the MAF and one civilian were killed in the incident, according to initial reports.4 In addition, two civilians were shot dead by the MAF in downtown Thaton, Thaton Township on the same day, according to residents.5 The KNU/KNLA also attacked the Kin Mon Chaung police post in Kyaikhto Township on 27 April 2021 and this was followed by subsequent clashes.6 Furthermore, clashes in Shwe Yaung Pya area (between Bilin and Thaton townships) were reported on 28 April 20217 as well as on 29 April 2021 at an MAF base near Naung Bo and Kyaik Kaw villages in Thaton Township.8 Instances of boats traversing the Than Lwin River on the Thai-Myanmar border being shot by the MAF continued to be reported. -
And Shan State (East)
Ethnic Armed Actors and Justice Provision in Myanmar Brian McCartan and Kim Jolliffe October 2016 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank everyone who contributed to this paper, including the many members of ethnic armed organizations, civil society organizations, political parties, and independent observers who will remain anonymous, but took time to provide valuable information. This paper has benefited immensely from the generous feedback provided by Susan Lee and Lisa Denney who reviewed early drafts of the paper. About the Authors Brian McCartan is a PhD candidate at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. He has worked for over two decades in Southeast Asia, specializing in security, ethnic politics, and development, with a particular focus on Myanmar. Having worked in Southeast Asia for over eight years, Kim Jolliffe is an independent researcher, writer, analyst and trainer, specializing in security, aid policy, and ethnic politics in Myanmar. He is the lead researcher on the Social Services in Contested Areas (SSCA) research project. Brian McCartan is the primary author of this report, while Kim Jolliffe provided additional primary research and editorial input. About The Asia Foundation The Asia Foundation is a nonprofit international development organization committed to improving lives across a dynamic and developing Asia. Informed by six decades of experience and deep local expertise, our programs address critical issues affecting Asia in the 21st century—governance and law, economic development, women’s empowerment, environment, and regional cooperation. In addition, our Books for Asia and professional exchanges are among the ways we encourage Asia’s continued development as a peaceful, just, and thriving region of the world.