DOCSLIB.ORG

Fossil Flora and Fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina Annex D Ela

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fossil Flora and Fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina Annex D Ela FOSSIL FLORA AND FAUNA OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ANNEX D ELA Odjeljenje tehničkih nauka Knjiga 10/2 FOSILNA FLORA I FAUNA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE ANEKS Ivan Soklić DOI: 10.5644/D2019.89 MONOGRAPHS VOLUME LXXXIX Department of Technical Sciences Volume 10/2 FOSSIL FLORA AND FAUNA OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ANNEX Ivan Soklić Ivan Soklić – Fossil Flora and Fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina / Annex Original title: Fosilna flora i fauna Bosne i Hercegovine/Aneks, Sarajevo, Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 2001. Publisher Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina For the Publisher Academician Miloš Trifković Reviewers Dragoljub B. Đorđević Ivan Markešić Editor Enver Mandžić Translation Amra Gadžo Proofreading Amra Gadžo Correction Sabina Vejzagić DTP Zoran Buletić Print Dobra knjiga Sarajevo Circulation 200 Sarajevo 2019 CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 57.07(497.6) SOKLIĆ, Ivan Fossil flora and fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina : Annex / Ivan Soklić ; [translation Amra Gadžo]. - Sarajevo : Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina = Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 2019. - 207 str. ; 25 cm. - (Monographs / Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina ; vol. 89. Department of Technical Sciences ; vol. 10/2) Prijevod djela: Fosilna flora i fauna Bosne i Hercegovine. - Na spor. nasl. str.: Fosilna flora i fauna Bosne i Hercegovine ISBN 978-9926-410-42-1 COBISS.BH-ID 27485446 CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................ 9 FOSSIL FLORA AND FAUNA OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (ANUBIH, Works 74/9, Sarajevo 2001) ............................................................... 11 1. A TABULAR OVERVIEW OF THE STRATIGRAPHY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BY REGIONAL DIVISION ............... 12 1.1. NORTH-EASTERN BOSNIA ........................................................................ 13 1.2. SOUTH-EASTERN BOSNIA ......................................................................... 14 1.3. EASTERN BOSNIA ....................................................................................... 15 1.4. SOUTHERN PART OF CENTRAL BOSNIA ................................................ 16 1.5. EASTERN PART OF CENTRAL BOSNIA ................................................... 16 1.6. WESTERN PART OF CENTRAL BOSNIA .................................................. 17 1.7. NORTHERN BOSNIA .................................................................................... 18 1.8. NORTH-WESTERN BOSNIA ....................................................................... 20 1.9. SOUTH-WESTERN BOSNIA ........................................................................ 22 1.10. NORTHERN HERZEGOVINA ...................................................................... 23 1.11. WESTERN HERZEGOVINA ......................................................................... 23 1.12. EASTERN HERZEGOVINA ......................................................................... 24 2. DICTIONARY OF SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR SPECIES OF THE FOSSIL FLORA AND FAUNA OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA DETERMINED FROM 1878 TO 1990 ............................................................... 26 2.1. DESCRIPTIVE NAMES .................................................................................. 26 2.2. GEOGRAPHIC AND CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC NAMES OF SPECIES ...................................................................................... 63 2.3. NAMES OF SPECIES DEDICATED TO PALAEONTOLOGISTS ................ 68 5 2.4. NAMES FROM GRECO-ROMAN MYTHOLOGY ....................................... 73 2.5. CHANGES TO THE NAME OF THE GENERA AND NEW SPECIES ........ 74 3. AUTHORS OF DIAGNOSES OF THE SPECIES OF THE FOSSIL FLORA AND FAUNA OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA .................................................................. 75 3.1. LIST OF COUNTIES IN WHICH THE AUTHORS WORKED PERSONALLY OR FROM WHICH THEY RECEIVED THE FOSSILS TO BE DETERMINED ....................................... 75 3.2. ARRANGEMENT OF AUTHORS ACCORDING TO THE CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC AND BIOSYSTEMATIC TOPICS DISCUSSED ...................................................................................... 82 3.2.1. PALEOZOIC IN GENERAL .................................................................. 82 3.2.2. LOWER PALEOZOIC ............................................................................82 3.2.3. CAMBRIAN............................................................................................ 82 3.2.4. ORDOVICIAN ....................................................................................... 82 3.2.5. SILURIAN .............................................................................................. 82 3.2.6. DEVONIAN ........................................................................................... 83 3.2.7. CARBONIFEROUS IN GENERAL ...................................................... 84 3.2.8. LOWER CARBONIFEROUS ................................................................ 84 3.2.9. UPPER CARBONIFEROUS ................................................................. 84 3.2.10. PERMIAM IN GENERAL ..................................................................... 85 3.2.11. LOWER PERMIAN ............................................................................... 86 3.2.12. UPPER PERMIAN ................................................................................. 86 3.2.13. MESOZOIC IN GENERAL ................................................................... 86 3.2.14. TRIASSIC IN GENERAL ...................................................................... 87 3.2.15. LOWER TRIASSIC ............................................................................... 87 3.2.16. MIDDLE TRIASSIC IN GENERAL ..................................................... 88 3.2.17. ANISIAN IN GENERAL ....................................................................... 88 3.2.18. UPPER ANISIAN (ILLYRIAN) ............................................................ 88 3.2.19. LADINIAN ............................................................................................. 88 3.2.20. UPPER TRIASSIC IN GENERAL ........................................................ 88 3.2.21. CARNIAN .............................................................................................. 89 3.2.22. NORIAN – RHAETIAN ........................................................................ 89 3.2.23. JURASSIC IN GENERAL ..................................................................... 89 3.2.24. LOWER JURASSIC ............................................................................... 90 3.2.25. MIDDLE JURASSIC ............................................................................. 90 3.2.26. UPPER JURASSIC ................................................................................ 91 6 3.2.27. CRETACEOUS IN GENERAL .............................................................. 91 3.2.28. LOWER CRETACEOUS ....................................................................... 92 3.2.29. UPPER CRETACEOUS ......................................................................... 92 3.2.30. TERTIARY IN GENERAL .................................................................... 93 3.2.31. PALEOGENE IN GENERAL ................................................................ 94 3.2.32. PALEOCENE ......................................................................................... 94 3.2.33. EOCENE ................................................................................................ 94 3.2.34. OLIGOCENE ......................................................................................... 95 3.2.35. OLIGO-MIOCENE ................................................................................ 96 3.2.36. NEOGENE IN GENERAL ..................................................................... 96 3.2.37. MIOCENE IN GENERAL ..................................................................... 96 3.2.38. LOWER MIOCENE ............................................................................... 97 3.2.39. FRESHWATER OLDER MIOCENE ..................................................... 97 3.2.40. OLDER MIDDLE MIOCENE (BADENIAN) ....................................... 97 3.2.41. YOUNGER MIDDLE MIOCENE (SARMATIAN) .............................. 98 3.2.42. OLDER UPPER MIOCENE (PANNONIAN) ....................................... 98 3.2.43. YOUNGER UPPER MIOCENE (PONTIAN) ....................................... 98 3.2.44. FRESHWATER UPPER MIOCENE ...................................................... 99 3.2.45. PLIOCENE ............................................................................................. 99 3.2.46. QUATERNARY IN GENERAL ............................................................. 99 3.2.47. PLEISTOCENE....................................................................................... 99 3.2.48. HOLOCENE ......................................................................................... 100 3.3. ACTIVITIES OF THE AUTHORS IN RELATION TO THE DISCOVERY OF NEW TAXA ........................................................ 100 3.3.1. ALGAE ................................................................................................. 100 3.3.2. NANNOFOSSILIA .............................................................................. 101 3.3.3. SPOROPHYTA ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Gradstein, Lames Ogg and Alan Smith 18 the Jurassic Period J
    Felix Gradstein, lames ogg and Alan smith 18 The Jurassic Period J. G. OGG iographic distribution of Jurassic GSSPs that have been ratified (ye Table 18.1 for more extensive listing). GSSPs for the honds) or are candidates (squares) on a mid-Jurassic map base-Jurassic, Late Jurassic stages, and some Middle Jurassic stages PNS in January 2004; see Table 2.3). Overlaps in Europe have are undefined. The projection center is at 30" E to place the center kured some GSSPs, and not all candidate sections are indicated of the continents in the center of the map. basaurs dominated theland surface. Ammonites are themain fossils neously considered his unit to he older. Alexander Brongniart rmrrelatingmarine deposits. Pangea supercontinent began to break (1829) coined the term "Terrains Jurassiques" when correlat- h md at the end of the Middle Jurassic the Central Atlantic was ing the "Jura Kalkstein" to the Lower Oolite Series (now as- m. Organic-rich sediments in several locations eventually became signed to Middle Jurassic) of the British succession. Leopold t source rocks helping to fuel modern civilization. von Buch (1839) established a three-fold subdivision for the Jurassic. The basic framework of von Buch has been retained as the three Jurassic series, although the nomenclature has var- 8.1 HISTORY AND SUBDIVISIONS ied (Black-Brown-White, Lias-Dogger-Malm, and currently L1.1 Overview of the Jurassic Lower-Middle-Upper). The immense wealth of fossils, particularly ammonites, in hc term "Jura Kalkstein" was applied by Alexander von the Jurassic strata of Britain, France, German5 and Switzer- bmholdt (1799) to a series ofcarhonate shelfdeposits exposed land was a magnet for innovative geologists, and modern con- the mountainous Jura region of northernmost Switzerland, cepts of hiostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy, correlation, and d he first recognized that these strata were distinct from paleogeography grew out of their studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unique Devonian of Immouzer-Du-Kandar (Middle Atlas Basement) – Biostratigraphy, Faunas, and Facies Development
    Aboussalam & al. Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar The unique Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar (Middle Atlas basement) – biostratigraphy, faunas, and facies development ZHOR SARAH ABOUSSALAM, RALPH THOMAS BECKER, JULIA RICHTER, SVEN HARTENFELS, AHMED EL HASSANI & STEPHAN EICHHOLT Fig. 1: View (from the hill at Douar Ahmed-ben-Mellouk) on Devonian exposures of Immouzer-du-Kandar (hill rising from Chabat el Jenanet, Sections C2 and C3 of CYGAN et al. 1990), our Section C4, with outcrop of the lower Emsian conglomerate (Chabat Jenanet Formation) along and above the track, faulted upper Emsian to lower Givetian limestones in the lower slope (new Ahmed-ben-Mellouk Formation), the reef breccia forming a small terrace ca. 2/3 upwards, and the Famennian upper slope (new Chabat el Hallouf Formation, Section C5) towards the top. The slope to the left (NNE) is occupied by Triassic red beds. Section numbers are marked in circles. 1. Introduction Mesozoic Middle Atlas, with the best and most important outcrops in the tectonic window The Middle Atlas divides the Moroccan (“boutonnière”) at Immouzer-du-Kandar, ca. Meseta into the Western and Eastern Meseta, 40 km S of Fès. The wooded Jebel Kandar to which differ strongly in the Devonian in terms the SW is a more than 1600 m high mountain of facies and synsedimentary structural built of Jurassic strata (Fig. 2). Fossiliferous geology (e.g., overviews of EL HASSANI & Ordovician to Lower Carboniferous BENFRIKA 1995, 2000). There is restricted formations crop out to the NW, from Dour knowledge of the Palaeozoic basement of the Rouda towards the SE, the Chabat el Jenanet, Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 50 (2000), No. 1, pp. 67-97 Revision of ammonoid biostratigraphy in the Frasnian (Upper Devonian) of the Southern Timan (Northeast Russian Platform) R. THOMAS BECKER1, MICHAEL R. HOUSE2, VLADIMIR V. MENNER3 & N. S. OVNATANOVA4 1 Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2 School of Ocean and Earth Science, Southampton Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO 14 3ZH, U.K. 3 Institute of Geology and Exploitation of Combustible Fuel, Fersman 50, Moscow 117312, Russian Federation 4 All-Russia Research Geological Oil Prospecting Institute, Shosse Entuziastov 36, Moscow 105819, Russian Federation ABSTRACT: BECKER, R.T., HOUSE, M.R., MENNER, V.V. & OVNATANOVA, N.S. (2000). Revision of ammonoid biostratig- raphy in the Frasnian (Upper Devonian) of the Southern Timan (Northeast Russian Platform). Acta Geologica Polonica, 50 (1), 67-97, Warszawa. New field work in outcrops of the Ukhta Region (Southern Timan) together with the re-exanimation of former collections allows a detailed revision of the ammonoid zonation in one of the classical Frasnian regions of Russia. There is a total of 47 species, 18 of which are new or recorded for the first time from the region. The latter applies to representatives of Linguatornoceras, Phoenixites, Aulatornoceras s.str. and Acantho- clymenia. New taxa are Chutoceras manticoides n.gen. n.sp. and Linguatornoceras yudinae n.sp. In the Ust’yarega Formation regional Hoeninghausia nalivkini, Timanites keyserlingi and Komioceras stuckenber- gi Zones can be recognized which correlate with the international Frasnian divisions UD I-B/C.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Note
    THE NAUTILUS 130(3):132–133, 2016 Page 132 Research Note A tumbling snail (Gastropoda: The width of the shell, based on the camera’s scale dots, Vetigastropoda: Margaritidae) seems to have been close to 40 mm, with the extended foot as much as 100 mm. The characteristic covered In August 2015, the NOAA ship OKEANOS EXPLORER con- umbilicus can only partially be seen in the photograph, ducted deep-sea studies in the northwestern Hawaiian so the identification remains uncertain. Hickman (2012) Islands, which now are within the Papahanaumokuakea noted that species of Gaza from the Gulf of Mexico Marine National Monument. The ship deployed the might be associated with chemosynthetic communi- remotely operated vehicle DEEP DISCOVERER (D2 ROV), ties, but the mollusk in the photographs was living on whose live video feed was shared with researchers on manganese-encrusted basalt. shore via satellite transmission. Hickman (2003; 2007) reported “foot thrashing” as an On 5 August 2015, the D2 ROV was exploring angular escape response to predators and in the laboratory by basalt blocks and sediment patches on the steep inner “mechanical disturbance” in the trochoidean gastropods slope of Maro Crater, an unusual 6 km-wide crater east Umbonium vestiarium (Linnaeus, 1758), Isanda coronata of Maro Reef (25.16o N, 169.88o W, 2998–3027 m). The A. Adams, 1854, and other species of the family cameras recorded what appeared to be a fish attacking or Solariellidae. The observations provided here are the first being attacked by some other unidentified animal. When of such behavior in Gaza spp. and among the few reports the ROV cameras were zoomed in on the encounter, the on behavior of non-cephalopod deep-sea mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • New Report and Taxonomic Comparison of Anadara and Tegillarca Species of Arcidae (Bivalvia: Arcoidea) from Southern Coast of India
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438 New Report and Taxonomic Comparison of Anadara and Tegillarca Species of Arcidae (Bivalvia: Arcoidea) from Southern Coast of India Souji.S1, Tresa Radhakrishnan2 Department of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram-695 581, Kariyavattom, Kerala, India Abstract: Arcacea family is economically important group of animals. Most of the species in this family are misplaced into invalid subgenera and Indian arcids are wanted a revision in systematic positon. In the case of Arcidae family; all of the species are treated under Anadara as main genera, however, some authors considered that the Tegillarca genus is only a sub genus of Arcidae family. Anadara is the commercially important genus of bivalves of Arcidae family. These two genera are confused by many taxonomists and some considered that the morphometric changes of Tegillarca are only the habitual adaptation. But the collected samples from the same habitat from the southern part of India is clearly demarked the distinction between Anadara species and Tegillarca species. In this paper the differences between these two genera are illustrated with the help of specimens from the same habitat and with the help of taxonomic literature of these genera. Species level classification was done based on the morphometric characters like peculiarities of (i) periostracum, (ii) cardinal area, (iii) umbo, (iv) adductor muscle scar and (v) pallial line. The specimens were collected from Neendakara, Vizhinjam and Kovalam along with the south west coast and Thiruchendur in Tamil Nadu, south east coast of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichthyosauria, Parvipelvia) from the Lower Jurassic of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile T
    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 98 (2020) 102459 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of South American Earth Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames First temnodontosaurid (Ichthyosauria, Parvipelvia) from the Lower Jurassic of the Atacama Desert, northern Chile T ∗ Rodrigo A. Oteroa,b,c, , Patricio Sepúlvedad a Red Paleontológica U-Chile, Laboratorio de Ontogenia y Filogenia, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Av. Las Palmeras, 3425, Santiago, Chile b Consultora Paleosuchus Ltda, Huelén 165 Oficina C, Providencia, Santiago, Chile c Museo de Historia Natural y Cultural del Desierto de Atacama, Parque El Loa S/n, Calama, Chile d GeoBlast S.A, Antonio Bellet 444, Oficina 120, Providencia, Santiago, Chile ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We describe fragmentary ichthyosaur skull remains of a single individual recovered from Lower Jurassic marine Ichthyosauria strata in northern Chile. The preserved teeth display distinctive features such as a very long, robust and coarsely Lower jurassic infolded roots; as well as low, labio-lingually compressed, large triangular crowns with carinae. Dental features south Pangea are consistent with those of the genus Temnodontosaurus, previously known in the Lower Jurassic of Europe. This Paleobiogeography find represent the first record of a temnodontosaurid ichthyosaur in the southern hemisphere, reinforcing a pattern of faunal interchange between the northern Tethys and southern Panthalassa, prior to the separation of Palabras clave: Laurasia and Gondwana, and before the full establishment of the Caribbean Seway. Ichthyosauria Jurásico Inferior Pangea sur RESUMEN Paleobiogeografía Describimos restos craneales fragmentarios de ictiosaurio pertenecientes a un único individuo, recuperado desde estratos marinos del Jurásico Inferior del norte de Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of the Hairy Ark Cockle (Anadara Gubernaculum, Reeve 1844) in Mayangan Coastal Waters, Subang – Province West Java: New Distribution Record of Indonesia
    Asian Journal of Conservation Biology, December 2016. Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 70-74 AJCB: FP0075 ISSN 2278-7666 ©TCRP 2016 Occurrence of the hairy ark cockle (Anadara gubernaculum, Reeve 1844) in Mayangan coastal waters, Subang – Province West Java: new distribution record of Indonesia Dewi Fitriawati1*, Nurlisa Alias Butet2 and Yusli Wardiatno2 1Master Program in Aquatic Resources Management, Graduate School of Bogor Agricultural University, Kampus IPB Dramaga – Bogor 16680, Indonesia 2Department of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Bogor Agricultural University, Kampus IPB Dramaga – Bogor 16680, Indonesia (Accepted November 25, 2016) ABSTRACT Thirty six specimens of the hairy ark cockle (Anadara gubernaculum Reeve, 1844) were collected from Mayangan waters, Subang of Province West Java, during marine biodiversity survey along northern coast of Java Island, Indonesia. Previous records of the cockle showed its occurrence in Cilincing, northern coast of Jakarta, Semarang coastal waters of Province Central Java, and Sidoarjo coastal waters located in northern part of Province East Java. The identification of the species was performed by morphological characters and is supported by molecular analysis. This finding represents a new distribution record of the species in Indonesia. Keywords: Arcidae, bivalves, first record, mollusc, north Java. INTRODUCTION A.gubernaculum from Mayangan waters, Subang – Province West Java, Indonesia. At the same time it is a As an aquatic biodiversity hotspot, Indonesia has rich and diverse marine organisms, one of them is the cock- new distribution record of the species in Indonesian les group of Arcidae. The family Arcidae is a large and waters. diverse family of marine bivalve distributed worldwide in warm seas of tropical areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ponderous Ark Aquaculture in Florida
    The Potential of Blood Ark and Ponderous Ark Aquaculture in Florida Results of Spawning, Larval Rearing, Nursery and Growout Trials Leslie N. Sturmer, Jose M. Nuñez, R. LeRoy Creswell, and Shirley M. Baker TP-169 SEPTEMBER 2009 Cover illustration: Ann Meyers This research was supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under USDA Special Research Grant No. 2002-3445-11946; and by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration (NOAA) under NOAA Grant No. NA06 OAR-4170014. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these organizations. Additional copies are available by contacting: Shellfish Aquaculture Extension Program Florida Sea Grant University of Florida University of Florida PO Box 89 PO Box 110409 Cedar Key, FL 32625-0089 Gainesville, FL 32622-0409 (352)543-5057 (352) 392-2801 www.flseagrant.org TP 169 September 2009 The Potential of Blood Ark (Anadara ovalis) and Ponderous Ark (Noetia ponderosa) Aquaculture in Florida Results of Spawning, Larval Rearing, Nursery, and Growout Trials Leslie N. Sturmer Shellfish Aquaculture Extension Program Cooperative Extension Service Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida Cedar Key Jose M. Nuñez The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience University of Florida St. Augustine R. LeRoy Creswell Florida Sea Grant College Program Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida Fort Pierce Shirley M. Baker Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program School of Forest Resources and Conservation Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida Gainesville September 2009 TP 169 ii Preface In November 1999, a workshop on New Molluscs for Aquaculture was conducted by the University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Florida Sea Grant, and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Phylogenetic Classification of the Cretaceous Ammonites V
    N.Jb. Geo\. Palaont. Abh. Stuttgart, Januar 1997 Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Cretaceous ammonites V. Euomphaloceratidae By M. R. Cooper, Durban With 5 figures in the text COOPER, M. R. (1997): Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Cretaceous ammo­ nites. V. Euomphaloceratidae. - N. Jb. Geo\. Palaont., Abh., 203: 1-21; Stuttgart. Abstract: Phylogenetic analysis of Euomphaloceratinae COOPER, 1978, a group within highly diversified and heterogeneous Acanthocerataceae, indicates a fundamental dichotomy which suggests promotion of this taxon to family rank with recognition of two subfamilies. Nominate Euomphaloceratinae comprise E. (Euomphaloceras), E. (Kanabiceras), Burroceras, Paraburroceras, P. (Pseudaspidoceras), P. (Ampakabites), and Morrowites, and Romaniceratinae subfam. nov. is made up of Schindewo/fites, Kameruno­ ceras, Codazziceras, Proromaniceras (Proromaniceras), P. (Obiraceras), Neomphaloceras, Yubariceras and Romaniceras (?with Shuparoceras as a subgenus). Zusammenfassung: Die phylogenetische Analyse der Euomphaloceratinae COOPER, 1978, einer Gruppe der hoch diversifizierten und heterogenen Acanthocerataceae, weist auf eine fundamentale Dichotomie innerhalb der Unterfamilie hin. Der Gruppe wird daher Familienrang verliehen und zwei Unterfamilien abgegrenzt. Die Nominat-Unter­ familie Euomphaloceratinae umfaBt E. (Euomphaloceras), E. (Kanabiceras), Burroceras, Paraburroceras, P. (Pseudaspidoceras), P. (Ampakabites) und Morrowites. Zur zweiten Unterfamilie Romaniceratinae subfam. nov. gehiiren Schindewo/fites,
    [Show full text]
  • La Col·Lecció Paleontològica Gómez-Alba Del MGB-MCNB
    Treb. Mus. Geol. Barcelona, 19 (2013): 59-149 La col·lecció paleontològica Gómez-Alba del MGB-MCNB Jaume Gallemí1, Vicent Vicedo1, Gregori López2 i Luis Troya2 Abstract GALLEMÍ, J., VICEDO, V., LÓPEZ, G. & TROYA, L. The Gómez-Alba palaeontological collection of the MGB-MCNB. We present the catalogue of the palaeontological collection belonging to the late Dr. Julio Gómez-Alba, former curator of Palaeontology at Barcelona’s Museum of Geology, now integrated in Barcelona’s Natural History Museum Consortium. He proposed the donation of his collection to the city of Barcelona in November 2010 and the Barcelona’s Institute of Culture (ICUB) accepted it on the 11th February 2011. Formed by 4.990 specimens and 25 batches, it is not the col- lection of a palaeontological researcher but that of a general palaeontologist. Many items in this collection were figured in a field guide authored by Gómez-Alba (1988) dealing with the fossils of Spain and Europe. The catalogue is, apart from some minor corrections, the literal transcription of the database originally associated to the collection that –since its acceptation– has neither been updated nor revised. Key words: catalogue, collection, palaeontology, Gómez-Alba, MGB-MCNB. Resumen GALLEMÍ, J., VICEDO, V., LÓPEZ, G. y TROYA, L. La colección paleontológica Gómez-Alba del MGB-MCNB. Se presenta el catálogo de la colección paleontológica que había pertenecido al recientemente fallecido Dr. Julio Gómez-Alba, antiguo conservador de Paleontología del Museo de Geología de Barcelona, actualmente integrado en el Consorcio del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Barcelona. La propuesta de donación de la colección a la ciudad de Barcelona se realizó en noviembre de 2010 y fue aceptada por el Instituto de Cultura de Barcelona (ICUB) en fecha 11 de febrero de 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Anadara Kagoshimensis (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Arcidae)
    Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.2076 Anadara kagoshimensis (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Arcidae) in the Adriatic Sea: morphological analysis, molecular taxonomy, spatial distribution, and prediction PIERLUIGI STRAFELLA1, ALICE FERRARI2, GIANNA FABI1, VERA SALVALAGGIO1, ELISA PUNZO1, CLARA CUICCHI1, ANGELA SANTELLI1, ALESSIA CARIANI2, FAUSTO TINTI2, ANNA NORA TASSETTI1 and GIUSEPPE SCARCELLA1 1 Istituto di Scienze Marine (ISMAR), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), L.go Fiera della Pesca, 2, 60125 Ancona, Italy 2 Department of Biological, Geological & Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Via Selmi, 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Fabio Crocetta Received: 11 October 2016; Accepted: 3 August 2017; Published on line: 7 December 2017 Abstract Morphological analysis, molecular characterization, and a study of the distribution and density of Anadara kagoshimensis (Tokunaga, 1906) specimens collected in the Adriatic Sea were carried out using materials and data collected in the course of 329 bottom trawl hauls conducted in five yearly surveys, from 2010 to 2014. Morphological and molecular analysis allowed clarifying the confused taxonomy of the largest alien ark clam species invading Italian waters and the Mediterranean Sea. Analysis of the distribution and density data demonstrated that, along the Italian coast, A. kagoshimensis is mostly found at depths of 8 to 50 m, with a catch frequency of more than 98% in the hauls involving silty-clay sediment at a depth of 8-30 m. The hotspot map clearly shows a reduction in the distribution area of the species from 2010 to 2012.
    [Show full text]