- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
The unique Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
(Middle Atlas basement) – biostratigraphy, faunas, and facies development
ZHOR SARAH ABOUSSALAM, RALPH THOMAS BECKER,
JULIA RICHTER, SVEN HARTENFELS,
AHMED EL HASSANI & STEPHAN EICHHOLT
Fig. 1: View (from the hill at Douar Ahmed-ben-Mellouk) on Devonian exposures of Immouzer-du-Kandar (hill rising from Chabat el Jenanet, Sections C2 and C3 of CYGAN et al. 1990), our Section C4, with outcrop of the lower Emsian conglomerate (Chabat Jenanet Formation) along and above the track, faulted upper Emsian to lower Givetian limestones in the lower slope (new Ahmed-ben-Mellouk Formation), the reef breccia forming a small terrace ca. 2/3 upwards, and the Famennian upper slope (new Chabat el Hallouf Formation, Section C5) towards the top. The slope to the left (NNE) is occupied by Triassic red beds. Section numbers are marked in circles.
1. Introduction
Mesozoic Middle Atlas, with the best and most important outcrops in the tectonic window
The Middle Atlas divides the Moroccan (“boutonnière”) at Immouzer-du-Kandar, ca.
Meseta into the Western and Eastern Meseta, 40 km S of Fès. The wooded Jebel Kandar to which differ strongly in the Devonian in terms the SW is a more than 1600 m high mountain of facies and synsedimentary structural built of Jurassic strata (Fig. 2). Fossiliferous
- geology (e.g., overviews of EL HASSANI & Ordovician
- to
- Lower
- Carboniferous
BENFRIKA 1995, 2000). There is restricted formations crop out to the NW, from Dour knowledge of the Palaeozoic basement of the Rouda towards the SE, the Chabat el Jenanet,
127
- Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology
- Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol. 10 - n° 1 - 2020
- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
and then towards the Chabat al Sitout (Fig. 4) 2006 for overview)). There are coarse The Devonian litho- and biostratigraphy of the conglomerates and slump masses with “alien” area has been established by the CHARRIÈRE & (e.g., TAHIRI et al. 2017) magmatic rocks, RÉNAULT (1989) and CYGAN et al. (1990; Fig. which must have been derived from a proximal 3). Comparisons with other Meseta regions Neoproterozoic to Lower Palaeozoic source. showed from the beginning that the succession This differs considerably from the basement of includes many unique sedimentological units, other Meseta regions. Therefore, any new
- faunas and floras (FAIRON-DEMARET & stratigraphical,
- sedimentological,
REGNAULT 1986), which isolate it both from palaeontological, and geochemical data add to the closest Devonian of the East-Central the knowledge of a crucial segment of Meseta Meseta (e.g., PIQUE & MICHARD 1981; Azrou- palaeogeography and tectonics. However, the Khenifra nappes) and from the predominantly Immouzer-du-Kandar Devonian may represent siliciclastic Eastern Meseta e.g., at Tazekka, a transported, allochthonous unit, as the nappes which is separated by the Tazekka-Bsabis- of the Azrou to Khenifra region. Bekrit Fault Zone (see HOEPPFNER et al. 2005,
Fig. 2: Position of the Jurassic Jebel Kandar and the Jenanet succession (red dot for Fig. 1) in the SW corner of topographic sheet, 1: 50 000, NI-30-VIII-3c, Sefrout.
128
- Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology
- Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol. 10 - n° 1 - 2020
- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
By detailed section logging, conodont and OUARHACHE (1987): Unpublished thesis on macrofauna sampling, as well as microfacies the Palaeozoic to Triassic at the NW margin analyses in the last ca. 10 years, we can of the Middle Atlas S of Fés. significantly refine the local litho- and
CHARRIÈRE (1989) and CHARRIÈRE
&biostratigraphy and provide a more precise RÉGNAULT (1989): Principles of Devonian reconstruction of facies changes, sea-level, and Carboniferous litho- and biostratigraphy and local influences of global events, for of Immouzer-du-Kandar. example around the Emsian-Eifelian, middle- CHARRIÈRE (1990): Unpublished Ph.D. upper Givetian, and Frasnian-Famennian Thesis on the Hercynian evolution of the boundaries. The studied sections begin in the Middle Atlas basement, with detailed data for branching valley of Chabet el Jenanat and Immouzer-du-Kandar. ascend the western slope of the hill just to SE, WILLEFERT & CHARRIÈRE (1990): Detailed reaching up to the crest (Figs. 1, 2, 4; at x = description of Ordovician and Silurian litho541.8, y = 352.3; GPS N33°45´58.4´´, and graptolite biostratigraphy. W4°56´50.9´´). There are numerous normal
CYGAN
- et
- al.
- (1990):
- Conodont
faults, which offset especially the upper biostratigraphy of Emsian to lower Frasnian Emsian to Givetian succession at close units at Immouzer-du-Kandar and their distance (Fig. 1). These had to be respected in significance for the understanding of the order to avoid mistakes in the small-scale sedimentary evolution and palaeogeography
- lateral correlations.
- of the region.
RACHEBEUF (1990a, 1990b): Record of the
chonetids Ctenochonetes robardeti and Plicanoplica carlsi from lower Emsian grey
2. Research History
HORON (1954): First (unpublished) report on shales of Immouzer-du-Kandar. fossiliferous Silurian (with graptolites) to OUARHACHE et al. (1991): Records of Upper Lower Devonian (with brachiopods) strata at Viséan foraminifers, calcareous algae Immouzer-du-Kandar, followed by a Viséan (Koninckopora), and “pseudo-algae”, such as transgression.
Palaeoberesella, Kamaena, Stacheia, and
CHARRIÈRE & RÉGNAULT (1983) and Aoujgalia.
- CHARRIÈRE et al. (1984): Preliminary notes on
- EL HASSANI & BENFRIKA (1995, 2000):
the Immouzer-du-Kandar Devonian litho- and Overviews of the Devonian of the Moroccan
- biostratigraphy.
- Meseta, including a summary for the Middle
BRICE et al. (1984): Description and Atlas basement. biostratigraphic dating of Emsian, supposed BERKHLI (1999): Discussion of the
- Frasnian, and upper Famennian brachiopods.
- foraminifer age of Viséan limestones at
FAIRON-DEMARET & RÉGNAULT (1986): Immouzer-du-Kandar. Description of Lower and Middle Devonian BERKHLI et al. (2000): Brief discussion of the plant remains, with implications for microfacies of Upper Viséan limestones of stratigraphy (Fig. 3) and palaeobiogeography. Immouzer-du-Kandar in the frame of a RÉGNAULT & CHAUVEL (1987): Description general discussion of Lower Carboniferous of the first Lower Devonian carpoid of sedimentologie and geodynamics of the NE Morocco from the Aïn el Beida Formation, Meseta. representing probably a new (un-named) SARTENAER (2000): Re-assignment of
- genus of the Anomalocystitida (Mitrata).
- supposed Planovatirostrum sp. described by
129
- Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology
- Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol. 10 - n° 1 - 2020
- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
BRICE et al. (1984) to the new genus of sediments with a terrestrial, coastal, Phacoiderhynchus. siliciclastic inner shelf, carbonate platform, JANSEN (2001): Brief comments on some of seamount, and deep pelagic origin (compare the Pragian brachiopods (Euryspirifer) CHARRIÈRE & RÉGNAULT 1989, tab. 1). The
- described by BRICE et al. (1984).
- presence of several coarse reworking units
MICHARD et al. (2008): Reference to the proves significant synsedimentary tectonic Chabat Jenanat conglomerate with reworked movements and active, steep fault scarps in granites, ignimbrites, Ordovician quartzites, the source region of material, from where
- and Silurian slates.
- mass flows moved downwards. The deep
GERRIENE et al. (2010): Reference to the erosion into Neoproterozoic basement and the possible occurrence of the aneurophytalean perfect rounding of pebbles show that an genus Rellimia in the “plant shale” at adjacent island must have existed, where
- Immouzer-du-Kandar.
- material was constantly moved in fluviatile or
BECKER (2012): Illustration of the Eovariscan coastal environments, prior to transport and breccia at Immouzer-du-Kandar, as an downslope re-deposition. Parts of the example for double reworking. BECKER & ABOUSSALAM (2014): Brief topographic high were deeply drowned leading to condensed cephalopod limestone reference to the distinctive upper Givetian to accumulation on a former seamount. But middle Frasnian facies at Immouzer-du- during highstands, pelagic anoxic to euxinic
- Kandar.
- conditions developed. Upslope, along the
SCHWERMANN (2014): Unspecified record of island shoals, a top Middle to basal Upper shark teeth in Frasnian samples from Devonian reef existed, which was later
- Immouzer-du-Kandar.
- uplifted and completely eroded. These strong
RICHTER et al. (2016): Preliminary new contrasts indicate in total a tectonically highly conodont data for the Emsian/Eifelian and active shelf basin slope near to one or more
- upper Famennian at Immouzer-du-Kandar.
- islands. After the complex Eovariscan period,
BECKER et al. (2016): Brief reference to the the Viséan strata can be better placed in the discovery of upper Givetian goniatites at palaeogeographic context of adjacent
- Immouzer-du-Kandar.
- successions (e.g., BERKHLI et al. 2000).
RICHTER (2017): Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis on the upper Emsian to Eifelian and upper 4. Litho- and biostratigraphy
- Famennian carbonate succession.
- Our new studies concentrated on the
TAHIRI et al. (2017): Geochronological dating Emsian to Famennian interval (Fig. 4), but for of granite clasts within the Chabat Jenanet the sake of completeness, earlier and later
- Conglomerate as Ediacarian and Cambrian.
- intervals are included and briefly reviewed
COZAR et al. (2019): Discussion of based on literature data. Immouzer-du-Kandar Viséan foraminifers in
the context of survival and/or reworking of 4.1. Silurian-Devonian transition
Lower/Middle Viséan forms into the Upper Viséan.
A thick succession of Pridoli graptolite shales, previously without a formation name (proposal: Douar Rouda Formation), occurs
3. Facies setting and synsedimentary around the Douar Rouda village (WILLEFERT
tectonics et al. 1990, figs. 3-4). At the top, records of
The Immouzer-du-Kandar facies setting Pristiograptus transgrediens and Linograptus
was very complex, with a close superposition posthumus and scyphocrinitid debris give an
130
- Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology
- Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol. 10 - n° 1 - 2020
- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
upper Pridoli age. CHARRIÈRE & RÉGNAULT orthoconic cephalopods, nuculid bivalves, (1989) recorded the Lochkovian index and fragmented crinoids. This un-named species Uncinatograptus uniformis from formation may correlate at least partly with several samples but this was not upheld in the the widespread Scyphocrinites Limestone of more detailed study of WILLEFERT et al. the Anti-Atlas (HAUDE et al. 2014) and many (1990). The same applies to a record of other regions (e.g., RÉGNAULT 1985), which “Monograptus hercynicus” (Sample IK 92), straddles the Silurian-Devonian boundary
which was changed to “M.” prognatus.
(e.g., CORRIGA et al. 2013). However, there are no local conodont data so far. Therefore, a lower Lochkovian age still needs to be proven.
4.2. Aïn el Beida Formation (Pragian)
WILLEFERT et al. (1990) illustrated only a faulted lower contact of the thick, fine, rather monotonous, dark-grey, micaceous shales of the Aïn el Beida Formation. It forms a 250 m wide outcrop belt at the SE end of Douar Rouda (BRICE et al. 1984; Fig. 5). The laminated or slightly bioturbated shales yielded, apart from bivalves, gastropods, ostracods, bryozoans, and orthocones, abundant trilobites, including asteropygids, phacopids, and Odontochile (s.l.). The traditional Odontochilinae are most typical for the Pragian and extend into the basal Emsian (e.g., BUDIL et al. 2008). The known brachiopods, crinoids (Asperocrinus), plants (Taeniocrada), acritarchs, and poorly
- preserved
- spores
(Camptozonotriletes
caperatus) are not in conflict with a Pragian age (FAIRON-DEMARET & RÉGNAULT 1987). RÉGNAULT & CHAUVEL (1983) discovered a rare stylophorid echinoderm in this formation. The environment was a subtidal, moderately shallow shelf with a constant supply of fine siliciclastics from a hinterland that could have been at some distance. In comparison with the preceding pelagic nodular limestones, the Pragian was locally regressive. But there is currently no record for the middle/upper Lochkovian at Immouzer-du-Kandar (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3: Devonian lithological succession at Immouzerdu-Kandar by FAIRON-DEMARET & RÉGNAULT (1986, fig. 2), with proportions of unit thicknesses and the position of biostratigraphically relevant samples.
The graptolite-rich unit is conformably followed by a thick succession of nodular
- limestone
- (“barre
- noduleuse”)
- with
131
- Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology
- Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol. 10 - n° 1 - 2020
- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
Fig. 4: Revised top-Silurian to Lower Carboniferous lithology and lithostratigraphy at Immouzer-du-Kandar. showing the succession of characteristic fossil groups, facies, seismically triggered reworking episodes, and locally expressed bioevents.
132
- Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology
- Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol. 10 - n° 1 - 2020
- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
Fig. 5: Simplified geological cross-section through the Immouzer-du-Kandar Devonian (updated from BRICE et al. 1984, fig. 2, showing their sample numbers = K.-no.; compare more expanded NW-SE cross-section of CHARRIÈRE 1989, fig. 6), using the new lithostratigraphic units.
4.3. Chabat Jenanat Formation (lower which caused gravitational gliding down from
- Emsian)
- the original shallow-water setting. Therefore,
The “Poudingue de la Chabat Jenanat” of the local change from subtidal shales and
BRICE et al. (1984) and CHARRIÈRE & siltstones with neritic fauna to coarse RÉGNAULT (1989) is here re-named as Chabat conglomerate and high-turbulence does not Jenanat Formation but restricted to its main necessarily mean a shallowing of the lithology, up to 100 m thick, coarse, strictly environment. It rather reflects a second unsorted and polymict conglomerate with interval of block faulting, which created an well-rounded pebbles (Figs. 5-6; Chabat instable slope.
- Jenanat Conglomerate). The main lithologies
- The timing of synsedimentary tectonism
are grey Ordovician quartzites, dark cherts can be deduced from the age of the youngest (perhaps Silurian), slates, Neoproterozoic to observed clast and of the oldest overlying Cambrian granites of unclear regional sediment. Limestone pebbles are very rare but provenance (TAHIRI et al. 2017), and various we extracted one directly from the solid bed acidic volcanites (Figs. 7-8). CHARRIÈRE & that was large enough for microfacies analysis RÉGNAULT (1989) described various tuffs and and conodont dating. It represents a unique, ignimbrites. There is no evidence for any hypoxic, ostracod wackestone (Fig. 9.1) with sorting or grading within thick beds. calcisiltite matrix, a facies type that does not Therefore, sedimentation must have occurred occur in the overlying limestone succession.
- as violent mass flows in channels along a The
- single
- obtained,
- fragmentary
significant slope. The source for the top- Polygnathus s. str. is too incomplete for Precambrian to Lower Palaeozoic pebbles species identification but its small basal pit is must have been at close distance (within a few a morphological feature that did not develop km). Deep excavation and rounding occurred until the upper half of the lower Emsian (Po. over considerable time in a fluviatile to inversus Zone; e.g., BULTYNCK 1987). Topcoastal setting of an uplifted tectonic block lower to basal upper Emsian conodonts occur forming an island. This enabled the in crinoidal limestones overlying the excavation and mixing of very heterogeneous conglomerate (CYGAN et al. 1990; see below). and heterochronous rocks. Marine re- In consequence, one block tilting phase must sedimentation occurred due to a second phase have occurred within the late lower Emsian, a of seismic activity (see also the sedimentary time interval of ca. 3 ma duration (BECKER et
- model of CHARRIÈRE & RÉGNAULT 1989),
- al. 2020 in press). It was capable to uplift
133
- Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology
- Frontiers in Science and Engineering - Vol. 10 - n° 1 - 2020
- Aboussalam & al.
- Devonian of Immouzer-du-Kandar
sediment from subtidal, deeper neritic facies to a coastal level, leading there to rounding and pebble formation. Just slightly later, the pebble was picked up by a seismically triggered mass flow that brought with it much older pebbles that may have been around for a much longer time.
Strong lower Emsian block faulting and reworking is not common in other Meseta regions. BECKER et al. (2015) used the phrase “Eovariscan prelude” for the Lochkovian to Eifelian interval. The closest other evidence for a contemporaneous formation of breccias and olistolite emplacement comes from the Jebel ben Arab between Azrou and Meknes (LAZREQ 1990 and new data). As already noted by CYGAN et al. (1990), it is also no coincidence that the even closer Devonian of Bab-el Ari just NE of Azrou shows a peculiar unconformity high in the lower Emsian, with a subsequent gap encompassing all of the upper Emsian (BOHRMANN & FISCHER 1985). It seems that late lower Emsian tectonism and uplift is a distinctive feature at the NE end of the Western Meseta.
Fig. 6: The coarse, polymict conglomerate (Chabet Jenanat) Formation as exposed at the base of the Jenanat hill.
Fig. 7: Details of the Chabet Jenanat Conglomerate, showing unsorted, well-rounded Lower Palaeozoic (probably Ordovician), light- to middle-grey quartzites and Ediacarian/Cambrian granite (center).
4.4. (new) Chabat Sitout Member (Emsian)
The type area of the new member is at the
Chabet el Sitout valley (BRICE et al. 1984; Fig. 5), ca. 1.5 km SE of the conodont-bearing Section 1 of CYGAN et al. (1990; compare cross-section Unfortunately, succession. in faults complicate
Calcareous shales