Integrating National Interests in Space
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Symposium On Space Policy, Regulations, and Economics – IAF 2012 October 1-5 E3.2 – International Cooperation: Goals, Constraints, and Means IAC-12.E3.2.7 Integrating National Interests in Space Dr. Scott Pace, Space Policy Institute George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA [email protected] 63rd International Astronautical Congress Naples, Italy October 1-5, 2012 In seeking to advance international security interests in space, the context for civil and commercial space activities must be considered along with the context for military and intelligence ones. The international political environment and rationales for space activities are shaped both “hard” and “soft” power realities. A broad international approach to space exploration can play an important strategic role in securing a more stable, peaceful environment for all space activities. Organizing such an approach will not be easy – not the least because of recent US space policy statements and programmatic decisions affecting lunar and Mars exploration efforts. US national interests and those of its friends and allies would benefit from a more effective integration of national security and civil space interests. In particular, this will require amending recent US policy mistakes and addressing shortfalls in important national space capabilities. Looking forward, a program of peaceful, multilateral exploration of the Moon would be a symbolic and practical means of creating a framework for peaceful space cooperation in concert with dual-use discussions of an international space code of conduct and other transparency and confidence building measures. 1.0 NATIONAL INTERESTS IN SPACE Recent years have seen the emergence of new threats to US space activities, threats that are The United States is facing new challenges and different from those of the Cold War and which new opportunities in integrating its civil, have their own distinct dynamics. Threats to the commercial, and national security space interests sustainability of space activities today come not in the context of a dynamic global environment. from a single superpower but from a much more Space activities today play critical roles in US diverse group of actors whose motivations can national security, economic growth, and range from deliberate to ambiguous and even scientific achievements. The Global Positioning accidental. In some cases, threats arise from a System (GPS) is an integral part of several known nation state while in others, it is critical infrastructures and enables functions impossible to attribute responsibility due to a ranging from survey and construction, to lack of sufficient “space situational awareness” farming, finance, and air traffic management – to support national intelligence needs. not to mention supporting US military forces worldwide. The International Space Station In 2007, without prior notification, China tested represents a unique collaborative partnership a high altitude anti-satellite weapon (ASAT) between the United States, Europe, Canada, against one of its old weather satellites. This test Japan, and Russia. There is increasing concern created tens of thousands of pieces of orbital in the United States and among other spacefaring debris and increased the risk of collision and nations with the long-term sustainability of the damage to many satellites operating in low Earth space environment in the face of increasing orbit (LEO), including the International Space amounts of orbital debris. International space Station, for many years. In 2009, there was an cooperation, space commerce, and international accidental collision over the Arctic between a space security discussions could be used to defunct Russian Kosmos communications reinforce each other in ways that would advance satellite and an active Iridium communications US interests in the sustainability and security of satellite that added even more orbital debris to all space activities. At present, however, these low Earth orbit. North Korea, faced with activities are largely conducted on their multiple UN sanctions, has continued developing individual merits and not as part of integrated ballistic missile capabilities under the guise of national strategy. peaceful space launches. Iran continues to jam IAC-12.E3.2.7 1 Symposium On Space Policy, Regulations, and Economics – IAF 2012 October 1-5 commercial satellite broadcasts in order to space systems is an infringement of a nation’s prevent foreign reports of domestic unrest from rights. The policy states that the United States reaching its population. There have been reports “recognizes the need for stability in the space of attempts at unauthorized access to US civil environment” and that it will pursue “bilateral scientific satellites, e.g., Terra and Landsat in and multilateral transparency and confidence 2007 and 2008, but the source of these attempts building measures to encourage responsible has not been confirmed. actions in space.” The global space community is a growing one The policy also made some important changes with new capabilities and new entrants each compared to the 2006 National Space Policy of year. Europe is building its own version of GPS, the previous Bush Administration, notably with titled “Galileo,” and has long been a leading respect to arms control. Unlike the 2006 policy, supplier of international commercial launch the 2010 policy does not categorically reject services with its Ariane family of launch space-related arms control that would constrain vehicles. China has flown several astronauts, US space activities but states that any such becoming only the third country to demonstrate agreements would have to be “equitable, independent human access to space. China is effectively verifiable, and enhance the national also constructing a space laboratory and has security of the United States and its allies.” This demonstrated complex rendezvous and docking is a traditional US policy formulation that was operations in preparation for a fully manned also used during the Reagan Administration. space station in 2020 – about the time the There is nothing in the policy, however, about International Space Station may be ending its actively pursuing new international treaties, operations. Japan has updated its domestic space creating legal norms, or characterizing space as a legislation to enable pursuit of national security “global commons” or being part of the “common and dual-use space projects in addition to heritage of all mankind” – ambiguous terms that traditional civil scientific efforts. India has are advocated in some segments of the aspirations for its own human spaceflight international space law and policy communities.ii missions and future lunar landings. The general coherence on the national security Space commerce is growing at many levels and foreign policy side of the 2010 National outside of North America, Europe and Russia. Space Policy is not matched in the section of the Japan has announced plans to sell radar satellites policy dealing with civil space exploration. The to Vietnam, while South Korea is seeking to sell policy says that the NASA Administrator shall an optical imaging satellite to the United Arab “set far-reaching exploration milestones. By Emirates. Brazil and China are continuing many 2025, begin crewed missions beyond the moon, years of space cooperation in remote sensing including sending humans to an asteroid.” while India and South Africa are close to Unlike the carefully crafted text elsewhere in the concluding their own space cooperation policy, this section appears to have been taken agreement. All of these countries recognize that directly from an April 15, 2010, speech by space capabilities are important for both practical President Obama at the Kennedy Space Center in and symbolic reasons and that these capabilities Florida.iii Subsequent technical work has shown are intrinsically “dual-use” in that civil, security, that there are few scientifically attractive, and commercial applications are based on similar technically feasible asteroids that can be reached skills and technologies. on this schedule.iv 1.1 US National Space Policy and the National Even worse, the international space community, Security Space Strategy which had been shifting attention to the Moon in anticipation of that being the next US focus of The current US National Space Policy, a exploration beyond low Earth orbit, felt comprehensive document that addresses the full blindsided by President Obama’s speech and the range of US interests in space, was released in new US emphasis on a human mission to an June 2010.i The policy continues many long- asteroid. Countries in Asia, such as Japan, India, standing principles, such as the right of all China and South Korea, saw the Moon as a nations to engage in the peaceful uses of outer challenging but feasible destination for robotic space, recognition of the inherent right of self- exploration and a practical focus for human defense, and that purposeful interference with space exploration. The asteroid mission was, IAC-12.E3.2.7 2 Symposium On Space Policy, Regulations, and Economics – IAF 2012 October 1-5 perhaps unintentionally on the part of the United • “We seek to address the contested States, taken as a sign that the United States environment with a multilayered would focus on partnerships with the most deterrence approach. We will support capable countries, such as Russia, for human establishing international norms and space exploration and not engage in broad transparency