DOCSLIB.ORG

H.R. Lll, the NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY AMENDMENTS ACT of 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
H.R. Lll, the NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY AMENDMENTS ACT of 2017 H.R. lll, THE NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2017 HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION APRIL 26, 2017 Serial No. 115–26 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce energycommerce.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 25–996 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 10:56 Aug 28, 2017 Jkt 037690 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 I:\115THCONGRESS\115X26NUCLEARPOLICYASKOK071317\115X26NUCLEARPOLICYP COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE GREG WALDEN, Oregon Chairman JOE BARTON, Texas FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey Vice Chairman Ranking Member FRED UPTON, Michigan BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois ANNA G. ESHOO, California TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas GENE GREEN, Texas MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois CATHY MCMORRIS RODGERS, Washington G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina GREGG HARPER, Mississippi DORIS O. MATSUI, California LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey KATHY CASTOR, Florida BRETT GUTHRIE, Kentucky JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland PETE OLSON, Texas JERRY MCNERNEY, California DAVID B. MCKINLEY, West Virginia PETER WELCH, Vermont ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois BEN RAY LUJA´ N, New Mexico H. MORGAN GRIFFITH, Virginia PAUL TONKO, New York GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York BILL JOHNSON, Ohio DAVID LOEBSACK, Iowa BILLY LONG, Missouri KURT SCHRADER, Oregon LARRY BUCSHON, Indiana JOSEPH P. KENNEDY, III, Massachusetts BILL FLORES, Texas TONY CA´ RDENAS, California SUSAN W. BROOKS, Indiana RAUL RUIZ, California MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Oklahoma SCOTT H. PETERS, California RICHARD HUDSON, North Carolina DEBBIE DINGELL, Michigan CHRIS COLLINS, New York KEVIN CRAMER, North Dakota TIM WALBERG, Michigan MIMI WALTERS, California RYAN A. COSTELLO, Pennsylvania EARL L. ‘‘BUDDY’’ CARTER, Georgia SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois Chairman DAVID B. MCKINLEY, West Virginia PAUL TONKO, New York Vice Chairman Ranking Member JOE BARTON, Texas RAUL RUIZ, California TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania SCOTT H. PETERS, California MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee GENE GREEN, Texas GREGG HARPER, Mississippi DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado PETE OLSON, Texas JERRY MCNERNEY, California BILL JOHNSON, Ohio TONY CA´ RDENAS, California BILL FLORES, Texas DEBBIE DINGELL, Michigan RICHARD HUDSON, North Carolina DORIS O. MATSUI, California KEVIN CRAMER, North Dakota FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey (ex TIM WALBERG, Michigan officio) EARL L. ‘‘BUDDY’’ CARTER, Georgia GREG WALDEN, Oregon (ex officio) (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 10:56 Aug 28, 2017 Jkt 037690 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 5904 I:\115THCONGRESS\115X26NUCLEARPOLICYASKOK071317\115X26NUCLEARPOLICYP CONTENTS Page Hon. John Shimkus, a Representative in Congress from the State of Illinois, opening statement ................................................................................................ 1 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 3 Hon. Paul Tonko, a Representative in Congress from the State of New York, opening statement ................................................................................................ 5 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 6 Hon. Greg Walden, a Representative in Congress from the State of Oregon, opening statement ................................................................................................ 8 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 8 Hon. Doris O. Matsui, a Representative in Congress from the State of Cali- fornia, opening statement .................................................................................... 10 Hon. Frank Pallone, Jr., a Representative in Congress from the State of New Jersey, prepared statement ........................................................................ 122 WITNESSES Dean Heller, a United States Senator from the State of Nevada ........................ 11 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 14 Ruben J. Kihuen, a Representative in Congress from the State of Nevada ....... 18 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 20 Dina Titus, a Representative in Congress from the State of Nevada ................. 24 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 26 Jacky Rosen, a Representative in Congress from the State of Nevada .............. 28 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 30 Joe Wilson, a Representative in Congress from the State of South Carolina .... 32 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 34 Edward F. Sproat III, Former Director, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Department of Energy ................................................................. 38 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 41 Answers to submitted questions ...................................................................... 156 Anthony J. O’Donnell, Chairman, Subcommittee on Nuclear Issues—Waste Disposal, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners ............. 46 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 48 Answers to submitted questions ...................................................................... 159 Edwin Lyman, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Global Security Program, Union of Concerned Scientists ............................................................................................ 56 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 59 Answers to submitted questions ...................................................................... 162 Steven P. Nesbit, Chairman, Back-end Working Group, United States Nuclear Infrastructure Council ......................................................................................... 70 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 72 Answers to submitted questions ...................................................................... 165 Mark McManus, General President, United Association of Union Plumbers, Pipefitters, Welders, and Service Technicians ................................................... 88 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 91 (III) VerDate Mar 15 2010 10:56 Aug 28, 2017 Jkt 037690 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 I:\115THCONGRESS\115X26NUCLEARPOLICYASKOK071317\115X26NUCLEARPOLICYP IV Page SUBMITTED MATERIAL Discussion Draft, H.R. lll, the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Acts of 2017,1 submitted by Mr. Shimkus Letter of April 24, 2017, from Judy Treichel, Executive Director, Nevada Nuclear Waste Task Force, et al., to House Members, submitted by Ms. Titus ...................................................................................................................... 123 Letter of April 26, 2017, from Geoff Freeman, President and CEO, American Gaming Association, to Mr. Shimkus and Mr. Tonko, submitted by Ms. Titus ...................................................................................................................... 131 H.R. 456, the Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act, submitted by Ms. Rosen . 132 Southern Nevada Map of Yucca Transportation Route, submitted by Ms. Rosen ..................................................................................................................... 135 Letter of April 26, 2017, from Matthew McKenzie, Nuclear Program Director and Senior Scientist, and Geoffrey Fettus, Senior Attorney, Nuclear Pro- gram, National Resources Defense Council, to Mr. Shimkus and Mr. Tonko, submitted by Mr. Tonko ...................................................................................... 136 Letter of April 21, 2017, from Governor Brian Sandoval, Nevada, to Mr. Shimkus and Mr. Tonko, submitted by Mr. Shimkus ....................................... 141 Letter of April 21, 2016, from Senator Dean Heller to Mr. Shimkus, submitted by Mr. Shimkus .................................................................................................... 143 Letter of April 24, 2017, from Dan Schinhofen, Chairman, Board of County Commissioners, Nye County, Nevada, to Mr. Walden, et al., submitted by Mr. Shimkus .................................................................................................... 145 Letter of April 24, 2017, from Steve Curtis, Past President, American Nuclear Society, Nevada Section, to Mr. Shimkus, submitted by Mr. Shimkus ........... 147 Editorial of November 21, 2016, ‘‘Trump, Congress should open $15B Yucca Mountain,’’ Albuquerque Journal,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Nuclear Freeze Campaign and the Role of Organizers
    Week Three Reading Guide: The Nuclear Freeze campaign and the role of organizers The reading by Redekop has been replaced by a book review by Randall Forsberg, and the long rough- cut video interview of Forsberg has been replaced by a shorter, more focused one. We start the first day with a brief discussion of Gusterson’s second article, building on the previous long discussion of the first one. September 23, 2019 Gusterson, H. 1999, “Feminist Militarism,” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 22.2, 17; https://doi.org/10.1525/pol.1999.22.2.17 This article focuses on the feminist themes Gusterson touched on in his earlier one. He begins restating the essentialist position and its opposition by feminists via “social constructedness.” Second-wave feminism started with Simone de Beauvoir’s idea that gender is constructed (“One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”) and extending to post-structuralist Judith Butler, for whom gender is a performance, potentially fluid, learned and practiced daily based on cultural norms and discourses. Gusterson is intrigued by the idea of feminist militarism as performance. “If we weren’t feminists when we went in [to the military], we were when we came out.” What was meant by this? How does the military culture described in the article reflect gender essentialism? On p. 22, Gusterson argues that the women’s movement and the peace movement “remake their mythic narratives… through the tropes of revitalization.” What does he mean by this? Do you agree or disagree? Why? Is feminist militarism feminist? Does your answer depend on whether you adopt essentialist or constructivist reasoning? Wittner, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Helen Caldicott the Nuclear Question
    October 15, 2009 Vol. 45 No. 26 The University of Western Ontario’s newspaper of record www.westernnews.ca PM 41195534 Western’s history in stained glass. Page 7 ENVIROWEEK Anti-nukes activist fuels green week B Y HEAT H ER TRAVIS nti-nuclear activist Dr. Helen Caldicott is chal- Alenging the community to reject all things nuclear – war, power, weapons and even imaging tools. The Australian-born pedia- trician has dedicated her life to opposing nuclear power and weapons because of the ‘There is a lot risk to humans and the envi- ronment. The subject of the 1982 National Film Board Oscar-winning documentary “If You Love This Planet” will to be proud of’ present a lecture Oct. 16 titled “The Nuclear Question: The Acute and Chronic Dangers of Nuclear Power and Nuclear War.” As a leading international Paul Mayne, Western News spokesperson on the hazards David Sylvester is the new principal of 55-year-old King’s University College, which has close to 3,800 full- and part-time students. An interview of the nuclear age, Caldicott’s appears on Page 6. talk jumpstarts campus Envi- roWeek Oct. 19-23 (see page 3). The week-long event offers a jammed schedule featuring everything from a hug-a-tree photo contest and farmer’s mar- Mustangs more than just a game ket to campus-wide clean-up and shopping – eco-style. B Y PAUL MAYNE back not only at her alma mater, The Caldicott event begins but in the city where she taught at 3:30 p.m. in the Natural Sci- hen you say Western Boxscore and coached.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph
    "If We ~aveEnouah weaDons to destrov the earth manv times over: Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph. D. unleashed power of the atom: "This ba- Science, which ought always to be Former Employee of both Los Alamos sic force of the universe cannot be fitted aiming at the good of humanity, is assist- National Laboratory and Lawrence into the outmoded concept of narrow ing in the work of destruction, and is con- Livermore National Laboratory nationalisms." The Lawrence Livermore stantly inventing new means for killing the This is an appeal to every secretary, National Laboratory's logo is: Science greatest number of people in the short- technician, custodian, scientist, engineer, in the National Interest. I believe that if est amount of time. This twentieth cen- and any other person whose participa- Albert Einstein were alive today, not only tury proved to be a century of inhuman tion supports the world war machine to would he not be working at LLNL, but slaughter. In the 1914 war, 15% of ca- withhold their skills fiom weapons work he would also be strongly condemning sualties were civilian; in 1939: 50%; in and from activities that support or en- its mission. And what is the logo of Los the wars fought in the 1950s: 75%; in able weapons work. Alamos National Laboratory? Science the 1990s: 90% of war casualties were "The unleashed power of the atom has Serving Society. Do the national labs civilian. Science that is used to terrorize changed evewngexcept our thinking. believe that they are serving society by people, kill them, or make them invalids Thus, we are drifting toward catastro- endangering its very existence through the is immoral science.
    [Show full text]
  • Helen Caldicott
    PAID US POSTAGE THE NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION PERMIT NO. 800 PERMIT NON-PROFIT ORG. NON-PROFIT SANTA BARBARA, CA SANTA 14TH ANNUAL FRANK K. KELLY LECTURE ON HUMANITY’S “ Just as I was about to enter medical school, FUTURE THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2015 • 7:30 PM I read a novel by Nevil Shute called On the Beach, which described a nuclear war that “PRESERVING THE FUTURE” killed everyone in the northern hemisphere. Eventually the radioactive cloud engulfed Melbourne, where I lived, signaling the end of human existence. That image branded my soul and remained with me throughout medical school, indeed throughout my life.” —Dr. Helen Caldicott eapons For more information, visit HELEN CALDICOTT www.wagingpeace.org/2015-kelly-lecture One of the world’s most ardent and influential speakers on nuclear weapons NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION and the fate of the Earth. PMB 121 Road Coast Village 1187 Suite 1 Santa Barbara, California 93108-2794 REQUESTED CHANGE SERVICE Committed to a World Free of Nuclear Weapons W of Nuclear Free World Committed to a wagingpeace.org • nuclearzero.org FOUNDATION PEACE AGE NUCLEAR THE NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION PRESENTS When Helen Caldicott was nineteen, she read a book that would change her life. It was entitled On the Beach. Since then, Dr. Caldicott has devoted her life HELEN CALDICOTT to educating the public about the medical One of the world’s most ardent and influential speakers on nuclear weapons and the fate of the Earth. hazards of the nuclear age and the changes in behavior necessary to prevent human and environmental devastation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    'RANDOM MURDER BY TECHNOLOGY': THE ROLE OF SCIENTIFIC AND BIOMEDICAL EXPERTS IN THE ANTI-NUCLEAR MOVEMENT, 1969 - 1992 LISA A. RUMIEL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer by Helen Caldicott
    UCLA Electronic Green Journal Title Review: Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer by Helen Caldicott Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6c4974vs Journal Electronic Green Journal, 1(25) Author Mirza, Umar Karim Publication Date 2007 DOI 10.5070/G312510721 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Review: Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer By Helen Caldicott Reviewed by Umar Karim Mirza Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Pakistan. Helen Caldicott. Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer . New York, NY: The New Press, 2006. 240 pp. ISBN: 978-1-59558-067-2. Hardcover, US$23.95. Helen Caldicott, a medical doctor, is the world's leading spokesperson for the antinuclear movement. She is the co-founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility, a nominee for the Noble Peace Prize, and the winner of the 2003 Lannan Cultural Freedom Prize. She is also the founder and President of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute (NPRI) ( http://www.nuclearpolicy.org ), headquartered in Washington DC. She is the world's leading anti-nuclear voice. The book under discussion is the sixth one that she has authored. The first four chapters talk about the true costs of nuclear power, the health effects of radiation, and nuclear accidents. The burning issue of nuclear waste is explained next, followed by the author's insights on the latest nuclear reactors. Chapters 7 and 8 are devoted to a discussion of nuclear weapons proliferation. In the following chapter, the author concludes that renewable energy is the ultimate choice for humanity. The last chapter makes suggestions as to how we as individuals can contribute towards having a sustainable energy future.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Women and Nuclear Opposition in the Tennessee “Nuclear” River Valley, 1974-2011
    Journal of the Southern Association for the History of Medicine and Science Volume 1 (no. 1) 2019 https://journals.troy.edu/index.php/JSAHMS/ The Invisible Issue: Southern Women and Nuclear Opposition in the Tennessee “Nuclear” River Valley, 1974-2011 Aubrey Underwood, PhD Assistant Professor of History, Department of African-American Studies, Africana Women’s Studies, and History, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA, United States Email: [email protected] Abstract “You are not going to build the plant there. We detest you there. We will not have your plant there,” screamed Tennessean Faith Young in response to the Tennessee Valley Authority’s 1974 announcement to build the “world’s largest nuclear plant” in Hartsville, Tennessee. 1 Throughout the late twentieth century, Southern women acted as the vanguard of the anti-nuclear movement, bringing the invisible issue of radiation into the public sphere. In bringing the public health and environmental effects of radiation to light, Southern women challenged the dominant and official narrative on nuclear safety promoted by the nuclear industry and the federal government. Helping to spread the message of the dangers of radioactivity were physician-activists equipped with epidemiological studies forecasting frightening public health and environmental effects from low-level radiation. This case-study includes the anti-nuclear activities of Faith Young and Jeanine Honicker, two local Tennesseans who challenged the TVA’s nuclear expansion for over three decades. Also included is TVA nuclear whistleblower Ann Harris, a local from East Tennessee who contributed to the vanguard of Southern anti-nuclear voices by exposing a history of unsafe practices from inside the TVA.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition of George Berka to Revise The
    Page 1 of 2 PRM-50-117 20 84 FR 36036 As of: 9/23/19 3:30 PM Received: September 22, 2019 Status: Pending_Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. 1k3-9cc2-44b0 Comments Due: October 09, 2019 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2019-0063 Criteria to Return Retired Nuclear Power Reactors to Operations Comment On: NRC-2019-0063-0003 Criteria to Return Retired Nuclear Power Reactors to Operations Document: NRC-2019-0063-DRAFT-0020 Comment on FR Doc # 2019-15934 Submitter Information Name: Ray Sundby Address: 6100 ROCKROSE DR NEWARK, CA, 94560 Email: [email protected] General Comment The procedure and criteria required to return retired nuclear power reactors to operations should be as streamlined as possible. Life on our planet as we know it is dying from fossil fuel pollution and the related global warming and ocean acidification. We need as much clean CO2 free energy generation as we can get and we need it as soon as we can get it. For supporting documentation see George Erickson's book Unintended Consequences. I fully agree with his comment and attachments related to this proposed rule. I have attached a pdf copy of his book. A link to a website where it can be downloaded for free is http://unintended- consequences.org/. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483faaaf9&format=xml&showorig=false 09/23/2019 Page 2 of 2 Attachments 20190822 Unintended Consequences https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483faaaf9&format=xml&showorig=false 09/23/2019 To The Reader Because of the increasing frequency and severity of the damage caused by Climate Change, I have decided to make this 2019 update of Unintended Consequences:…, my fifth pro-science book, available FREE to the public – even though the 2017 version sold on Amazon for about $23.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Sleepwalking to Armageddon: the Threat of Nuclear Annihilation Edited by Helen Caldicott
    Sleepwalking to Armageddon: The Threat of Nuclear Annihilation Edited by Helen Caldicott The New Press: New York, New York, 2017, 207 pp. Reviewed by Col. Paul A. Sigler, U.S. Army Countering WMD Graduate Fellow, National Defense University Dr. Helen Caldicott has been writing passionately about the dangers of nuclear technology since her 1979 publication Nuclear Madness: What You Can Do. An Australian pediatric physician, Dr. Caldicott has long argued that nuclear weapons pose an existential threat to the human species, and that—from a medical and humanitarian standpoint—there is no such thing as “safe” nuclear power. Sleepwalking to Armageddon: The Threat of Nuclear Annihilation is a seamless continuation of the themes of Dr. Caldicott’s previous work. This new collection of essays outlines the societal threats posed by nuclear weapons with the singular intent of mobilizing readers to take action to put an end to both the weapons and the industry that produces them. To accomplish this, Dr. Caldicott presents essays from a panoply of activists, journalists, and academics with specialties ranging from national security policy to anthropology. Several of these authors have advised the U.S. or Australian governments on arms control policy and negotiation. Nearly all of them are currently associated with think-tanks aligned with the anti-nuclear movement. Given this list of contributors, it is not surprising that apprehension over renewed tensions with Russia and unease over the nuclear policies of the Trump administration emerge as dominant themes of the book. Both of these themes identify a credible threat to the stability of post-Cold War nuclear deterrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Illuminating the Life of Dr. Helen Caldicott
    LEADERSHIP FOR SOCIAL CHANGE: ILLUMINATING THE LIFE OF DR. HELEN CALDICOTT LEAH HANES A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Ph.D. in Leadership and Change Program of Antioch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January, 2015 This is to certify that the Dissertation entitled: LEADERSHIP FOR SOCIAL CHANGE: DR. HELEN CALDICOTT: THE UNTOLD STORY prepared by Leah Hanes is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Leadership and Change Approved by: Carolyn Kenny, Ph.D., Chair date Laurien Alexandre, Ph.D., Committee Member date Elaine Gale ,Ph.D., Committee Member date Timothy Mousseau, Ph.D., External Reader date Copyright 2015 Leah Hanes All rights reserved Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dr. Carolyn Kenny for her ongoing support and encouragement, Dr. Laurien Alexandre, who nurtured the idea through to my chosen methodology, and Dr. Elaine Gale, whose wisdom as a writer gave me confidence in my own voice. Dr. Paula Caplan has played an important role in the development of my dissertation topic and approach to my research. Nancy Fawcett sent me to Antioch University Los Angeles in the first place armed with the confidence I needed to apply. Dr. Albert Erdynast encouraged me to pursue this degree. Finally, the faculty and students at Antioch University Los Angeles for their ongoing support. i Abstract This dissertation is a biographical study of the life of Dr. Helen Caldicott that details her life and work over the years from 1997 to 2014. The history of her significant role in the end of the Cold War and her influence in public opinion regarding nuclear power and nuclear arms has been well-documented through many books, films, and articles as well as her own autobiography up to this twenty-year-period.
    [Show full text]
  • And International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW)
    FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF DR. VICTOR SIDEL The origins of Physicians for Social Responsibil- ity (PSR) and International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) Sidney Alexander, MD Abstract Sidel 26 years later, on December 1985, with Jack This article reviews the beginnings and history of Geiger and me in Oslo, when IPPNW won the No- the physicians’ antinuclear movement. The role of bel Prize—a culmination of years of effort by many Victor W. Sidel, MD, is described, particularly his dedicated physicians and others. involvement with Physicians for Social Responsibil- Nuclear issues were then becoming a grave con- ity (PSR) and International Physicians for the Pre- cern to many. But American medicine paid little vention of Nuclear War (IPPNW). attention. “Nuclear issues are political issues.” • • • “Doctors should not become involved.” “These are I am honored and delighted to be part of this matters best left to ‘experts.’” Two years later, PSR wonderful celebration. My tasks today are to de- changed this and initiated the physicians’ anti- scribe the origins of Physicians for Social Responsi- nuclear movement. It is a story worth telling. bility (PSR) and briefly International Physicians for Figure 3 shows a timeline of historical events. the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), to review On August 3, 1939, Albert Einstein sent a letter the political climate and events of the mid 20th cen- to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt saying, tury that led to their formation, and, importantly, to Some recent work ... leads me to expect that the discuss Dr. Sidel’s role in their formation. element uranium may be turned into a new and Vic Sidel and I go back a long way.
    [Show full text]
  • T R a N S C R I
    TRANSCRIPT LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING COMMITTEE Inquiry into Nuclear Prohibition Melbourne—Friday, 28 August 2020 (via videoconference) MEMBERS Mr Cesar Melhem—Chair Mr David Limbrick Mr Clifford Hayes—Deputy Chair Mr Andy Meddick Dr Matthew Bach Dr Samantha Ratnam Ms Melina Bath Ms Nina Taylor Mr Jeff Bourman Ms Sonja Terpstra PARTICIPATING MEMBERS Ms Georgie Crozier Mrs Beverley McArthur Dr Catherine Cumming Mr Tim Quilty Mr David Davis Necessary corrections to be notified to executive officer of committee Friday, 28 August 2020 Legislative Council Environment and Planning Committee 1 WITNESS Dr Helen Caldicott. The CHAIR: I declare open the Environment and Planning Committee public hearing for the Inquiry into Nuclear Prohibition. Please ensure that mobile phones have been switched to silent and background noise is minimised. I would like to welcome any members of the public watching via the live broadcast. I would also like to acknowledge my colleagues here today: Dr Bach; Mr Hayes, the Deputy Chair; Mr Limbrick; Ms Bath; Mr Meddick; Ms Terpstra; Mrs McArthur; and Ms Taylor. A special welcome to our first witness, Dr Helen Caldicott. Thank you very much for making yourself available. Unfortunately we have not been able to see you in the flesh. I know your preference was to actually address the committee in person, but due to the recent events with COVID-19 that was not possible. We were looking forward to seeing you in person, but unfortunately we are not able to. But I am sure we will enjoy your session via Zoom. All evidence taken at this hearing is protected by parliamentary privilege as provided by the Constitution Act 1975 and is further subject to the provisions of the Legislative Council standing orders.
    [Show full text]