Preventing Nuclear

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preventing Nuclear Report Don G. Bates Preventing Nuclear War: What Physicians Can Achieve SUMMARY SOMMAIRE On its fifth anniversary, the International A l'occasion de son cinquieme anniversaire, on a accorde le Prix Nobel de la paix a l'Organisation Physicians for the Prevention of Nudear War internationale des medecins pronant la prevention was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The de la guerre nucleaire. Deux cardiologues de Boston organization was conceived by two Boston ont concu cette organisation a laquelle se sont joints cardiologists who joined with some Soviet des collegues sovietiques pour creer un forum colleagues to create an international forum for international dont le but etait de considerer les consequences medicales d'une guerre nucleaire et considering the medical consequences of and les moyens de la prevenir. Cet article, ecrit par means for preventing nudear war. This article l'archiviste de l'Organisation, documente la difficulte by the orgarization's archivist documents its de sa progression et sa croissance remarquable. Le difficult progress yet remarkable growth. fait de surmonter des obstacles serieux a contribue a Overcoming serious obstades has added to its augmenter sa force et sa credibilite. L'Organisation strength and credibility: now involving compte actuellement 145,000 membres repartis dans 41 pays. Elle est devenue le porte-parole organizations with 145,000 members in 41 international des medecins preoccupes par la guerre countries, IPPNW has become the nucle'aire. international voice of medicine's concern about nudear war. (Can Fam Physician 1986; Key words: Nudear war, prevention, 32:163-166.) physicians .....50- Mill.. Dr. Bates is the Thomas F. sons for taking stock of what has hap- Lown's efforts expanded to an inter- Cotton Professor of the History of pened and what has been accom- national scale as a result of his cardio- Medicine at McGill University and plished. logical research in the 1970s. During Canada's representative on the the Soviet-American collaborative governing council of the Beginnings medical research spawned by d6tente, International Physicians for the IPPNW's beginnings can be traced Lown began to work with Dr. Evgueni Prevention of Nuclear War. to two Boston cardiologists, Drs. Ber- Chazov, Director General of the Na- Reprint requests to: Dr. Don Bates, nard Lown and James Muller. Lown, tional Cardiological Research Centre 3655 Drummond Street, Montreal, professor of cardiology at Harvard's in Moscow. The subject of their re- PQ. H3G 1Y6. School of Public Health, began his search was sudden death in patients public opposition to nuclear weapons with heart disease. It is easy to under- in the early 1960s when he and a stand how their minds could turn to the number of other Boston doctors started problem of nuclear war and its threat W HEN THE International Physi- Physicians for Social Responsibility of sudden death for a large part of the cians for the Prevention of Nu- (PSR/US). Among their most notable world's population. clear War (IPPNW) met in Budapest at activities at that time was a group of Jim Muller's interests in Soviet the end of June, it marked the fifth articles in the New England Journal of medicine and the threat of nuclear war birthday of this remarkable organiza- Medicine 1-5 which outlined the medical were inspired by two events. As a sec- tion. This anniversary, and the fact effects of a nuclear war. Their findings ond-year medical student at Johns that IPPNW is the winner of the 1985 were of such interest that the U.S. Hopkins in 1967, Muller heard a talk Nobel Peace Prize are two good rea- Pentagon ordered 200 reprints! by the president of the Hopkins hospi- CAN. FAM. PHYSICIAN Vol. 32: JANUARY 1986 163 tal, Dr. Russell Nelson, about his re- tionship became even closer. these preliminary discussions were cent visit to the Soviet Union. Having Muller's experience with Soviet beset by political difficulties until each studied Russian as an undergraduate, medicine, with Chazov, and with the side understood how the other side re- Muller decided, with Nelson's help, to threat of nuclear war, proceeded quite lated to its own government. take a six-month elective at the First separately from that of Bernard Lown. For their part, the Soviet doctors in- Moscow Medical College. Within Yet, by the mid 1970s, both men were volved are closely connected with the months of hearing Nelson, Muller in the same specialty, at the same insti- Soviet leadership. For example, Cha- went to a series of lectures on the tution. Moreover, within cardiology it- zov, Ilyin, and Kuzin are all members threat of nuclear war by well-known self, Muller had come to regard Lown of the prestigious Soviet Academy of Hopkins psychotherapist, Jerome as his teacher and mentor. Medical Sciences. Moreover, Chazov Frank. Deeply moved by what Frank Both men independently came to the was a member of the medical team had to say, and noting the obvious idea, first in 1978, that there should be looking after Leonid Brezhnev before connection with his coming trip, some kind of joint effort by U.S. and he died. These men could hardly be Muller decided to dedicate himself to Soviet doctors to alert their two coun- expected to dissent from a government improved relations between Soviets tries to the growing peril and conse- viewpoint that they share. For the and Americans. quences of nuclear war. Both knew, Americans, any public stance that ap- Out of his Moscow experience, from first-hand experience, that Soviet peared to be based solely on Soviet Muller learned two things: how to physicians were equally concerned criticism of the U.S. government's po- speak the language, and how indiffer- about the threat. Both believed that sition would destroy their credibility at ent people were to the threat of nuclear they could count on their cooperation home. war. Other American students in in such a venture. To reflect these realities, one of the Moscow thought he was slightly In 1979, Lown wrote a number of ground rules established at Geneva crazy, while their Soviet counterparts letters to Soviet officials but it was was that, in all public utterances, any were studiously unhelpful. Soviet doc- ultimately with Chazov, that earnest criticism of the superpowers would be tors, on the other hand, were sympa- negotiations began. At first Chazov bilateral. Other guidelines included fo- thetic and Dr. Mikhail Kuzin, dean of doubted what could be achieved but fi- cussing their attention exclusively on the medical college, eagerly cooper- nally agreed to meet in Geneva in De- the issue of nuclear war, dealing with ated with Muller in establishing a med- cember, 1980, to establish,. ground it strictly as a consequence of their ical student exchange with Hopkins. rules for some kind of joint confer- professional commitments to protect But, on his return to the United States, ence. Muller and Lown were accom- life and preserve health, and giving Muller found it impossible to arouse panied by Dr. Eric Chivian, staff psy- their activities and findings wide pub- interest in this arrangement. chiatrist at the Massachusetts Institute lic exposure in the two countries. For a time Muller abandoned his ef- of Technology, who had recently been Besides hammering out an agreed forts, but, in 1970, he again found helping Dr. Helen Caldicott to resur- set of principles upon which a confer- himself in Moscow, this time as an rect the long dormant PSR/US. With ence could be based, the Geneva aide to the assistant secretary of Chazov was Dr. Leonid Ilyin, Director founders decided to broaden represen- health, Dr. Roger Egeberg. In this ca- of the Institute of Biophysics of the tation at the coming congress to in- pacity, Muller promoted the idea of an U.S.S.R. Ministry of Public Health, clude Britain and Germany, and, for extensive exchange between the two and chairman of the National Commis- obvious reasons, Japan. countries in the health field, as a way sion for Radiological Protection. By the time of that first congress, in of promoting peace. Egeberg agreed The other Soviet was Dr. Mikhail Airlie, Virginia in March, 1981, the and Muller found himself negotiating Kuzin, now director of the Vishnevsky original concept of a joint conference agreements on the study of cancer, Institute of Surgery. The reunion of had evolved into a fully international heart disease, and environmental Kuzin and his erstwhile student, gathering. Eleven countries were re- health that were subsequently signed Muller, so many years after they had presented by over 70 delegates, in- by Brezhnev and Nixon. In the first of set up the unsuccessful student ex- cluding four from Canada.6 At the a number of remarkable coincidences, change, was largely coincidental. same time, the international situation one result of these agreements was the Kuzin, a friend of Chazov since early had become more precarious. Ronald collaboration between Lown and Cha- postgraduate days, had been chosen Reagan had just been swom in as the zov on cardiac sudden death. for the Geneva discussions because of new U.S. president and the mood of The criss-crossing of Lown's and his experience with war injuries. In- the American delegation was one of Muller's interests do not end there. deed, Kuzin had read the 1962 caution. One false step in the now con- Also in 1970, Muller was assigned to a PSR/US article on the medical effects servative political climate of the delegation of Soviet physicians who of nuclear war when it first appeared. United States would have meant an in- were visiting the United States. That stant loss of credibility for the infant delegation was headed by Dr.
Recommended publications
  • THE NATIONAL FORUM the National CFIDS Foundation
    THE NATIONAL FORUM The National CFIDS Foundation Vol. 27, No. 1 – Summer 2021 NCF ANNOUNCES NEW GRANT RECIPIENT By Alan Cocchetto, NCF Medical Director April 22, 2021 – Copyright 2021 The National CFIDS Foundation is pleased to announce their latest research grant recipient, Dr. Jack Wands. Dr. Wands is a Professor of Gastroenterology and Medicine at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. Wands' proposal which is titled, “Aspartate asparaginyl beta- hydroxylase (ASPH) as an etiologic factor in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)” has received $65,000 from the National CFIDS Foundation. Dr. Wands has over 600 peer-reviewed medical journal articles in publication. According to the Foundation, there is evidence that ASPH may be accumulating in the cells of CFS patients. As such, this can dramatically impact the body's response to oxidative stress and hypoxia. Wands has planned both in-vitro as well as in-vivo studies in an attempt to understand the upregulation of ASPH on cell migration and signaling through various cellular pathways following exposure to an oxidative injury. Wands will also be comparing CFS patient samples with those of hepatic cancer patients with cancer-related fatigue. In addition, Wands has evidence that ASPH overexpression may be a risk factor for the early development of cancer which may be associated with CFS before the disease becomes clinically apparent or in other words, CFS as a pre-malignancy. Wands has observed this in pancreatic cancer patients. This is of importance since the National Cancer Institute has previously reported that CFS has been associated with increases in pancreatic cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Freeze Campaign and the Role of Organizers
    Week Three Reading Guide: The Nuclear Freeze campaign and the role of organizers The reading by Redekop has been replaced by a book review by Randall Forsberg, and the long rough- cut video interview of Forsberg has been replaced by a shorter, more focused one. We start the first day with a brief discussion of Gusterson’s second article, building on the previous long discussion of the first one. September 23, 2019 Gusterson, H. 1999, “Feminist Militarism,” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 22.2, 17; https://doi.org/10.1525/pol.1999.22.2.17 This article focuses on the feminist themes Gusterson touched on in his earlier one. He begins restating the essentialist position and its opposition by feminists via “social constructedness.” Second-wave feminism started with Simone de Beauvoir’s idea that gender is constructed (“One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”) and extending to post-structuralist Judith Butler, for whom gender is a performance, potentially fluid, learned and practiced daily based on cultural norms and discourses. Gusterson is intrigued by the idea of feminist militarism as performance. “If we weren’t feminists when we went in [to the military], we were when we came out.” What was meant by this? How does the military culture described in the article reflect gender essentialism? On p. 22, Gusterson argues that the women’s movement and the peace movement “remake their mythic narratives… through the tropes of revitalization.” What does he mean by this? Do you agree or disagree? Why? Is feminist militarism feminist? Does your answer depend on whether you adopt essentialist or constructivist reasoning? Wittner, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Helen Caldicott the Nuclear Question
    October 15, 2009 Vol. 45 No. 26 The University of Western Ontario’s newspaper of record www.westernnews.ca PM 41195534 Western’s history in stained glass. Page 7 ENVIROWEEK Anti-nukes activist fuels green week B Y HEAT H ER TRAVIS nti-nuclear activist Dr. Helen Caldicott is chal- Alenging the community to reject all things nuclear – war, power, weapons and even imaging tools. The Australian-born pedia- trician has dedicated her life to opposing nuclear power and weapons because of the ‘There is a lot risk to humans and the envi- ronment. The subject of the 1982 National Film Board Oscar-winning documentary “If You Love This Planet” will to be proud of’ present a lecture Oct. 16 titled “The Nuclear Question: The Acute and Chronic Dangers of Nuclear Power and Nuclear War.” As a leading international Paul Mayne, Western News spokesperson on the hazards David Sylvester is the new principal of 55-year-old King’s University College, which has close to 3,800 full- and part-time students. An interview of the nuclear age, Caldicott’s appears on Page 6. talk jumpstarts campus Envi- roWeek Oct. 19-23 (see page 3). The week-long event offers a jammed schedule featuring everything from a hug-a-tree photo contest and farmer’s mar- Mustangs more than just a game ket to campus-wide clean-up and shopping – eco-style. B Y PAUL MAYNE back not only at her alma mater, The Caldicott event begins but in the city where she taught at 3:30 p.m. in the Natural Sci- hen you say Western Boxscore and coached.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph
    "If We ~aveEnouah weaDons to destrov the earth manv times over: Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph. D. unleashed power of the atom: "This ba- Science, which ought always to be Former Employee of both Los Alamos sic force of the universe cannot be fitted aiming at the good of humanity, is assist- National Laboratory and Lawrence into the outmoded concept of narrow ing in the work of destruction, and is con- Livermore National Laboratory nationalisms." The Lawrence Livermore stantly inventing new means for killing the This is an appeal to every secretary, National Laboratory's logo is: Science greatest number of people in the short- technician, custodian, scientist, engineer, in the National Interest. I believe that if est amount of time. This twentieth cen- and any other person whose participa- Albert Einstein were alive today, not only tury proved to be a century of inhuman tion supports the world war machine to would he not be working at LLNL, but slaughter. In the 1914 war, 15% of ca- withhold their skills fiom weapons work he would also be strongly condemning sualties were civilian; in 1939: 50%; in and from activities that support or en- its mission. And what is the logo of Los the wars fought in the 1950s: 75%; in able weapons work. Alamos National Laboratory? Science the 1990s: 90% of war casualties were "The unleashed power of the atom has Serving Society. Do the national labs civilian. Science that is used to terrorize changed evewngexcept our thinking. believe that they are serving society by people, kill them, or make them invalids Thus, we are drifting toward catastro- endangering its very existence through the is immoral science.
    [Show full text]
  • Helen Caldicott
    PAID US POSTAGE THE NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION PERMIT NO. 800 PERMIT NON-PROFIT ORG. NON-PROFIT SANTA BARBARA, CA SANTA 14TH ANNUAL FRANK K. KELLY LECTURE ON HUMANITY’S “ Just as I was about to enter medical school, FUTURE THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2015 • 7:30 PM I read a novel by Nevil Shute called On the Beach, which described a nuclear war that “PRESERVING THE FUTURE” killed everyone in the northern hemisphere. Eventually the radioactive cloud engulfed Melbourne, where I lived, signaling the end of human existence. That image branded my soul and remained with me throughout medical school, indeed throughout my life.” —Dr. Helen Caldicott eapons For more information, visit HELEN CALDICOTT www.wagingpeace.org/2015-kelly-lecture One of the world’s most ardent and influential speakers on nuclear weapons NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION and the fate of the Earth. PMB 121 Road Coast Village 1187 Suite 1 Santa Barbara, California 93108-2794 REQUESTED CHANGE SERVICE Committed to a World Free of Nuclear Weapons W of Nuclear Free World Committed to a wagingpeace.org • nuclearzero.org FOUNDATION PEACE AGE NUCLEAR THE NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION PRESENTS When Helen Caldicott was nineteen, she read a book that would change her life. It was entitled On the Beach. Since then, Dr. Caldicott has devoted her life HELEN CALDICOTT to educating the public about the medical One of the world’s most ardent and influential speakers on nuclear weapons and the fate of the Earth. hazards of the nuclear age and the changes in behavior necessary to prevent human and environmental devastation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    'RANDOM MURDER BY TECHNOLOGY': THE ROLE OF SCIENTIFIC AND BIOMEDICAL EXPERTS IN THE ANTI-NUCLEAR MOVEMENT, 1969 - 1992 LISA A. RUMIEL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • ZERO VOLUME 25 for the Human Race
    2 0 1 4 ANNUAL REPORT NUCLEAR ZERO VOLUME 25 for the human race. not the arms race. NUCLEAR AGE HUMANIZE NOT MODERNIZE A Message from the President In the Nuclear Age, our technological capacity for destruction has outpaced our spiritual and moral capacity to control these destructive technologies. The Foundation is a voice for those committed to exercising conscience and choosing a decent future for all humanity. Wake Up!, a collection of peace poetry, can be ordered online at the NAPF Peace There is no way to humanize weapons that are Store at wagingpeace.org/shop/. inhumane, immoral and illegal. These weapons must be abolished, not modernized. And yet, all nine nuclear-armed countries are engaged in modernizing their nuclear arsenals. The US is leading the way, planning to spend more than $1 trillion on upgrading STAFF Paul K. Chappell, Peace Leadership Director its nuclear arsenal over the next three decades. Jo Ann Deck, Peace Leadership Assistant Sandy Jones, Director of Communications David Krieger, President In doing so, it is making the world more dangerous and less secure. Debra Roets, Director of Development The US could lead in humanizing rather than modernizing by Sharon Rossol, Office Manager reallocating its vast resources to feeding the hungry, sheltering the Judy Trejos, Development Officer Carol Warner, Assistant to the President homeless, providing safe drinking water, educating the poor, as well Rick Wayman, Director of Programs & as cleaning up the environment, shifting to renewable energy sources Operations and repairing deteriorating infrastructure. REPRESENTATIVES Ruben Arvizu, Latin American Representative Join us in making the shift from modernizing nuclear arsenals to Christian N.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer by Helen Caldicott
    UCLA Electronic Green Journal Title Review: Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer by Helen Caldicott Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6c4974vs Journal Electronic Green Journal, 1(25) Author Mirza, Umar Karim Publication Date 2007 DOI 10.5070/G312510721 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Review: Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer By Helen Caldicott Reviewed by Umar Karim Mirza Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Pakistan. Helen Caldicott. Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer . New York, NY: The New Press, 2006. 240 pp. ISBN: 978-1-59558-067-2. Hardcover, US$23.95. Helen Caldicott, a medical doctor, is the world's leading spokesperson for the antinuclear movement. She is the co-founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility, a nominee for the Noble Peace Prize, and the winner of the 2003 Lannan Cultural Freedom Prize. She is also the founder and President of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute (NPRI) ( http://www.nuclearpolicy.org ), headquartered in Washington DC. She is the world's leading anti-nuclear voice. The book under discussion is the sixth one that she has authored. The first four chapters talk about the true costs of nuclear power, the health effects of radiation, and nuclear accidents. The burning issue of nuclear waste is explained next, followed by the author's insights on the latest nuclear reactors. Chapters 7 and 8 are devoted to a discussion of nuclear weapons proliferation. In the following chapter, the author concludes that renewable energy is the ultimate choice for humanity. The last chapter makes suggestions as to how we as individuals can contribute towards having a sustainable energy future.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Women and Nuclear Opposition in the Tennessee “Nuclear” River Valley, 1974-2011
    Journal of the Southern Association for the History of Medicine and Science Volume 1 (no. 1) 2019 https://journals.troy.edu/index.php/JSAHMS/ The Invisible Issue: Southern Women and Nuclear Opposition in the Tennessee “Nuclear” River Valley, 1974-2011 Aubrey Underwood, PhD Assistant Professor of History, Department of African-American Studies, Africana Women’s Studies, and History, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA, United States Email: [email protected] Abstract “You are not going to build the plant there. We detest you there. We will not have your plant there,” screamed Tennessean Faith Young in response to the Tennessee Valley Authority’s 1974 announcement to build the “world’s largest nuclear plant” in Hartsville, Tennessee. 1 Throughout the late twentieth century, Southern women acted as the vanguard of the anti-nuclear movement, bringing the invisible issue of radiation into the public sphere. In bringing the public health and environmental effects of radiation to light, Southern women challenged the dominant and official narrative on nuclear safety promoted by the nuclear industry and the federal government. Helping to spread the message of the dangers of radioactivity were physician-activists equipped with epidemiological studies forecasting frightening public health and environmental effects from low-level radiation. This case-study includes the anti-nuclear activities of Faith Young and Jeanine Honicker, two local Tennesseans who challenged the TVA’s nuclear expansion for over three decades. Also included is TVA nuclear whistleblower Ann Harris, a local from East Tennessee who contributed to the vanguard of Southern anti-nuclear voices by exposing a history of unsafe practices from inside the TVA.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition of George Berka to Revise The
    Page 1 of 2 PRM-50-117 20 84 FR 36036 As of: 9/23/19 3:30 PM Received: September 22, 2019 Status: Pending_Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. 1k3-9cc2-44b0 Comments Due: October 09, 2019 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2019-0063 Criteria to Return Retired Nuclear Power Reactors to Operations Comment On: NRC-2019-0063-0003 Criteria to Return Retired Nuclear Power Reactors to Operations Document: NRC-2019-0063-DRAFT-0020 Comment on FR Doc # 2019-15934 Submitter Information Name: Ray Sundby Address: 6100 ROCKROSE DR NEWARK, CA, 94560 Email: [email protected] General Comment The procedure and criteria required to return retired nuclear power reactors to operations should be as streamlined as possible. Life on our planet as we know it is dying from fossil fuel pollution and the related global warming and ocean acidification. We need as much clean CO2 free energy generation as we can get and we need it as soon as we can get it. For supporting documentation see George Erickson's book Unintended Consequences. I fully agree with his comment and attachments related to this proposed rule. I have attached a pdf copy of his book. A link to a website where it can be downloaded for free is http://unintended- consequences.org/. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483faaaf9&format=xml&showorig=false 09/23/2019 Page 2 of 2 Attachments 20190822 Unintended Consequences https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483faaaf9&format=xml&showorig=false 09/23/2019 To The Reader Because of the increasing frequency and severity of the damage caused by Climate Change, I have decided to make this 2019 update of Unintended Consequences:…, my fifth pro-science book, available FREE to the public – even though the 2017 version sold on Amazon for about $23.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Everything You Treasure-For a World Free from Nuclear
    Everything You Treasure— For a World Free From Nuclear Weapons What do we treasure? This exhibition is designed to provide a forum for dialogue, a place where people can learn together, exchange views and share ideas and experiences in the quest for a better world. We invite you to bring this “passport to the future” with you as you walk through the exhibition. Please use it to write notes about what you treasure, what you feel and what actions you plan to take in and for the future. Soka Gakkai International © Fadil Aziz/Alcibbum Photography/Corbis Aziz/Alcibbum © Fadil Photo credit: Photo How do we protect the things we treasure? The world is a single system The desire to protect the things and connected over space and time. In people we love from harm is a primal recent decades, the reality of that human impulse. For thousands of interdependence—the degree to years, this has driven us to build which we influence, impact and homes, weave clothing, plant and require each other—has become harvest crops... increasingly apparent. Likewise, the This same desire—to protect those choices and actions of the present we value and love from other generation will impact people and people—has also motivated the the planet far into the future. development of war-fighting As we become more aware of our technologies. Over the course of interdependence, we see that centuries, the destructive capability benefiting others means benefiting of weapons continued to escalate ourselves, and that harming others until it culminated, in 1945, in the means harming ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • PNHP Newsletter Spring 2007
    PNHP Newsletter Spring 2007 Public Supports National Health Insurance 2008 Presidential Candidates' Health Plans New York Times/CBS News poll “Clinton asked at one point for a show of hands from the audience, 64 percent of Americans think that "the federal government should asking them to declare whether they preferred an employer-based system guarantee health insurance for all Americans," and 76 percent believe of insurance, a system that mandates all individuals to purchase insur- that universal access to health care is more important than recent tax ance, with help from the government if necessary, or one modeled on the cuts, according to a poll by the New York Times/CBS News in Medicare system. Overwhelmingly the audience favored moving toward February. The survey also found that 60 percent of those polled are a Medicare-like system for all Americans.” - Washington Post "willing to pay higher taxes so that all Americans have health insur- ance that they can't lose no matter what." Public support for compre- In a recent debate in Las Vegas, Sen. Hillary Clinton attacked the hensive health reform is at its highest level in over a decade. More than private health insurance industry, but failed to say if she would heed one-third of Americans (36 percent) say that the US health system the advice given by Iowa voters (above). Rep. Dennis Kucinich needs "complete rebuilding," more than at any time since 1994; 54 per- endorsed single payer national health insurance. Sen. Barack Obama cent say the system needs "fundamental" changes. Only 8 percent of lacks his own plan, but praised Former Senator John Edward’s those polled believe that the US health system needs only "minor" flawed "pay or play" approach, which attempts to shore up the disin- changes (New York Times/CBS poll February, 2007).
    [Show full text]