DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Impact Statement Report Prepared for Dexus CPA Pty Limited and Frasers Property AHL Limited October 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Impact Statement Report Prepared for Dexus CPA Pty Limited and Frasers Property AHL Limited October 2019 Western Gateway Sub-Precinct Proposal: Block B 14–30 Lee Street, Haymarket NSW 2000 Heritage Impact Statement Report prepared for Dexus CPA Pty Limited and Frasers Property AHL Limited October 2019 Sydney Office Level 6 372 Elizabeth Street Surry Hills NSW Australia 2010 T +61 2 9319 4811 Canberra Office 2A Mugga Way Red Hill ACT Australia 2603 T +61 2 6273 7540 GML Heritage Pty Ltd ABN 60 001 179 362 www.gml.com.au GML Heritage Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Western Gateway Sub-Precinct Proposal: Block B, 14–30 Lee Street, Haymarket NSW 2000—Heritage Impact Statement, undertaken by GML Heritage Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 18-0703B 1 Draft Report 4 September 2019 18-0703B 2 Final Report 17 September 2019 18-0703B 3 Revised Final Report 9 October 2019 Quality Assurance GML Heritage Pty Ltd operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2016. The report has been reviewed and approved for issue in accordance with the GML quality assurance policy and procedures. Project Manager: Don Wallace Reviewer: David Logan Issue No. 3 Issue No. 3 Position: Associate Position: Partner Date: 9 October 2019 Date: 9 October 2019 Copyright Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced at the end of each section and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified or agreed, copyright in this report vests in GML Heritage Pty Ltd (‘GML’) and in the owners of any pre-existing historic source or reference material. Moral Rights GML asserts its Moral Rights in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. GML’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Right to Use GML grants to the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty-free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral Rights of GML or third parties. GML Heritage Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 The Project .................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Site Ownership .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Site Location .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Report Background ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.7 Author Identification ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1.8 Terminology................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.9 Integrity of Graphic Illustrations.................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Heritage Listings ............................................................................................................................................ 8 3.0 Understanding the Place ............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Aboriginal History ........................................................................................................................................ 12 3.2 The Town Limits—Gateway ....................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Development of the Railway and Expansion ............................................................................................ 12 3.4 Changing Use and the New Millennium .................................................................................................... 13 4.0 Statutory Context ......................................................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Statutory Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.1 Heritage Act 1977 (NSW) .................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ......................................................................... 23 4.2 Draft and Anticipated Controls ................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1 Draft Central Sydney Planning Strategy 2016–2036 ........................................................................ 26 5.0 Setting and Contextual Design .................................................................................................................. 30 5.1 The Burra Charter, Setting and New Work ............................................................................................... 30 5.2 Contextual Design ...................................................................................................................................... 30 5.3 The Settings of Nearby Heritage Places ................................................................................................... 31 6.0 Heritage Design Guidelines ........................................................................................................................ 38 6.1 Views ........................................................................................................................................................... 38 6.2 Light ............................................................................................................................................................. 44 6.3 Edges ........................................................................................................................................................... 44 6.4 Proximity to the Former Parcels Post Office ............................................................................................. 45 6.5 Ground Plane .............................................................................................................................................. 45 6.6 Character and Materiality ........................................................................................................................... 46 6.7 Protection and Adaptive Re-use of the Goods Line ................................................................................. 46 6.8 Cumulative Impacts and Erection of Tall Buildings .................................................................................. 46 6.9 Stories and Interpretation ........................................................................................................................... 46 6.10 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................................................... 47 7.0 The Proposal ................................................................................................................................................. 48 7.1 Proposed Rezoning of Height and Density Provisions ............................................................................ 48 7.2 Indicative Scheme ...................................................................................................................................... 48 Western Gateway Sub-Precinct Proposal: Block B, 14–30 Lee Street, Haymarket NSW—Heritage Impact Statement, October 2019 GML Heritage 8.0 Assessment of Heritage Impacts .............................................................................................................. 50 8.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 50 8.2 Nearby Heritage Items ............................................................................................................................... 51 8.2.1 Central Station ..................................................................................................................................... 52 8.2.2 Former Parcels Post Office ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Parks, Urban Icons? the Case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney
    U H P H 2 0 1 6 I c o n s : T h e M a k i n g , M e a n i n g a n d U n d o i n g o f U r b a n I c o n s a n d I c o n i c C i t i e s | 505 Urban Parks, Urban Icons? The case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney Catherine Evans Faculty of the Built Environment, UNSW [email protected] This paper explores the question of how urban parks function as urban icons. It examines Bicentennial Park in Homebush Bay, 12 km west of the Sydney Central Business District (CBD) as a case study. Bicentennial Park was planned and designed between 1983 and 1988, a time when Australia, and its cities in particular, grappled with tensions between celebrating achievements of two hundred years of European settlement and redressing the cultural and ecological harm wrought by those achievements. The research focuses on a review of material related to the design and promotion of the park, and early reviews of the park. The discussion explores the influence of specific ideas about the city and ecology on the transformations of use, materiality, and physical form of the land that became Bicentennial Park. Findings reveal that Bicentennial Park at Homebush Bay was conceived as an awkwardly scripted design, which in turn reflects a convergence of urban planning initiatives, intensifying environmental awareness and ideological tensions within the then nascent Australian- based profession of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Analysis
    SITE ANALYSIS Site location + local context The Haymarket takes its name from the local neighbourhood. It sits entirely within an urban context and is bounded by the Pier Street flyover to the north, Harbour and Hay Streets, mixed, low-level commercial streets to the east and south respectively, and the light rail corridor to the west. The site is currently occupied by the Sydney Entertainment Centre in the east and a large multi-storey car park to the west. The raised Sydney monorail, which runs along its western, southern and eastern perimeter and includes the Paddy’s Market station, is to be closed and dismantled in June 2013. The local streets provide good connections into the city and university precincts and wider connections to Central Station. Connectivity to the west has historically been poor, after the introduction of a goods line segregated Ultimo and Pyrmont from the city. Pedestrian access is limited to the heavily trafficked Pier Street with stairs and ramps providing access to grade, and a footbridge from the Powerhouse Museum crossing Darling Drive and connecting with Paddy’s Market monorail station on the south- west corner of the site. SHFA is managing the creation of a new pedestrian corridor called the Goods Line (formerly known as the Ultimo Pedestrian Network or UPN). This project seeks to turn a disused goods line into a linear park supporting a range of activities – similar to the High Line in New York. This new corridor will land at the south-western corner of the site. The existing facilities to the north of the site within SICEEP will be redeveloped in a programme of regeneration to be completed by 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Cracknell Lonergan -Assessment of Heritage Significance – Rev. B
    Assessment of Heritage Significance Ultimo Tramways Power House Museum Independent Review REV. B Prepared on 30 January 2020 Prepared for Heritage NSW, Dept. of Premier & Cabinet 156a Church Street Newtown NSW 2042 (02) 9565 1554 [email protected] www.cracknelllonergan.com.au Contents 1.0 Introduction 002 2.0 Historical Assessment 006 3.0 Review of Current Heritage Listing 012 4.0 Discussion of Heritage Significance 016 5.0 Assessment of Heritage Significance (NSWOEH Guidelines) 024 6.0 Assessment of Social Significance (Heritage Victoria Guidelines) 042 7.0 Recommendations and Management Policies 044 8.0 Conclusion 048 9.0 Appendix A: Curriculum Vitae of Peter Lonergan 050 10.0 Appendix B: Archival Drawings - 1988 Additions (MAAS Collection) 051 11.0 Appendix C: Original 1988 Award Citation - Powerhouse Museum 058 12.0 Appendix D: Andrew Metcalf, Architecture in Transition (Extract) 064 13.0 Appendix E: Conservation Management Plan 2003 (Extracts) 066 14.0 Appendix F: State Heritage Inventory Datasheet (Ultimo Powerhouse) 085 Assessment of Heritage Significance | Ultimo Tramways Power House Museum | Prepared on 30 January 2020 1 of 88 Rev. B 1.0 Introduction Prepared On: 1.1 Executive Summary 15 January 2020 [DRAFT] Cracknell & Lonergan Architects have been requested to provide an independent assessment of the proposed State Listing of the structures 22 January 2020 [Revision A] at the Ultimo Powerhouse Site encompassing the Powerhouse 30 January 2020 [Revision B] Museum components in an application submitted by the National Trust. In our review of the proposed listing, this office has had regard Project Address: to the scope of assessment supplied in a brief by Heritage NSW, Ultimo Tramways Department of Premier and Cabinet, relevant desktop historical and archival materials from primary and secondary sources, a physical site Power House Museum investigation of key exterior and interior spaces as well as a review of the inclusion and exclusion guidelines in the assessment of heritage criterion for NSW and Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • August September 2010 Armidale & District Group
    Hakea fraseri Armidale & District Group PO Box 735 ARMIDALE NSW 2350 Volume 31 No 4 http://www.anps-armidale.org.au August September 2010 President: Secretary: Treasurer: Maria Hitchcock Liisa Atherton Phillip Rose 6775 1139 6779 1968 6775 3767 Hello Members, Winter is almost over and spring is just around the corner. This has been what I call a Melbourne winter – frequent rainfalls which have left the ground sodden and difficult to work. I’ve been trying to get a bobcat in to do some cleaning up for months and have to keep cancelling the bookings. The paddocks are saturated and dams are overflowing. This all bodes well for an excellent spring. As soon as the weather warms up our plants will jump out of the ground with vigour. The Solstice luncheon in June was very pleasurable. John and Barbara have consolidated their gardens and built up new beds ready for a spring planting. A soft carpet of sawdust creates a pathway between the beds allowing visitors to catch a glimpse of an amazing number of species of plants including many unusual ones being trialled. The garden has grown very large over the years and we spent quite a bit of time meandering through the collection. Lunch was delicious as usual and we all had some fun with a game of ‘Pass the Parcel’ which introduced us to a few personal secrets. The Presentation Dinner in Glen Innes for Jean Mott was a wonderful affair. About 32 people attended and the Crofters Cottage proved to be a perfect venue. Graeme Ingall presented Jean with her badge and some native flowers brought up from the Central Coast and he and Penelope Sinclair gave some excellent speeches about Jean’s great contribution to promoting native plants in the Glen Innes district over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Icc World Cup Cricket Attax Trading Cards
    ICC WORLD CUP CRICKET ATTAX TRADING CARDS - Instore Monday 12/1/15 Trading Name Address 1 Address 2 Suburb State Postcode Channel SAFEWAY PETROL 3503 ABBOTSFORD 286 JOHNSTON STREET ABBOTSFORD VIC 3067 Convenience ABBOTSFORD POINT NEWSAGENCY TANG C, & FENG, L 545 GREAT NORTH ROAD ABBOTSFORD NSW 2046 Newsagents COLES EXPRESS 6798 ABBOTSFORD CNR HODDLE ST & TRURO ST ABBOTSFORD VIC 3067 Convenience MAGNA GROUP PTY LTD MAGNA GROUP PTY LTD SHOP 51/52 HUB DRIVE ABERFOYLE PARK SA 5159 Newsagents ACACIA RIDGE NEWS LALLY PTY LTD T/AS 4/28 ELIZABETH STREET ACACIA RIDGE QLD 4110 Newsagents 7-ELEVEN 2187A ADAMSTOWN 531-537 GLEBE ROAD ADAMSTOWN NSW 2289 Convenience RUNDLE MALL PLAZA NEWSAGENCY FLORLIM PTY LTD T/AS SHOP G11, 44-60 RUNDLE MALL ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents CITI NEWS NEWSAGENCY HUANG LONG GROUP (AUSTRALIA)PL SHP 19-20, 49 PULTENEY STREET ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents TOPHAM MALL NEWSAGENCY TRAN DC & KC & MH T/AS SHOP 3-5, TOPHAM MALL ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents ADELAIDE RAILWAY STATION NEWSAGENCY A & HL PANDOS T/AS RAILWAY STATION CONCOURSE ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents ADELAIDE NEWSAGENCY D&M HEWISH NEWSAGENCIES P/L TA 16 ELIZA STREET ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents SOUTHERN CROSS NEWSAGENCY COLONNADES NEWSAGENCY P/L T/AS SHOP 24-28 STHN CROSS ARCADE ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents MYER CENTRE NEWSAGENT S & K FARRELL PTY LTD T/AS SHOP T26 MYER CTR RUNDLE MALL ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents RUNDLE PLACE NEWSAGENCY COLONNADES NEWSAGENCY P/L T/AS SHOP G12 RUNDLE PL 80 GRENFELL ADELAIDE SA 5000 Newsagents COLES EXPRESS 1926 WEST TERRACE 111 WEST TCE ADELAIDE
    [Show full text]
  • Two Centuries of Botanical Exploration Along the Botanists Way, Northern Blue Mountains, N.S.W: a Regional Botanical History That Refl Ects National Trends
    Two Centuries of Botanical Exploration along the Botanists Way, Northern Blue Mountains, N.S.W: a Regional Botanical History that Refl ects National Trends DOUG BENSON Honorary Research Associate, National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA. [email protected] Published on 10 April 2019 at https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/LIN/index Benson, D. (2019). Two centuries of botanical exploration along the Botanists Way, northern Blue Mountains,N.S.W: a regional botanical history that refl ects national trends. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 141, 1-24. The Botanists Way is a promotional concept developed by the Blue Mountains Botanic Garden at Mt Tomah for interpretation displays associated with the adjacent Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area (GBMWHA). It is based on 19th century botanical exploration of areas between Kurrajong and Bell, northwest of Sydney, generally associated with Bells Line of Road, and focussed particularly on the botanists George Caley and Allan Cunningham and their connections with Mt Tomah. Based on a broader assessment of the area’s botanical history, the concept is here expanded to cover the route from Richmond to Lithgow (about 80 km) including both Bells Line of Road and Chifl ey Road, and extending north to the Newnes Plateau. The historical attraction of botanists and collectors to the area is explored chronologically from 1804 up to the present, and themes suitable for visitor education are recognised. Though the Botanists Way is focused on a relatively limited geographic area, the general sequence of scientifi c activities described - initial exploratory collecting; 19th century Gentlemen Naturalists (and lady illustrators); learned societies and publications; 20th century publicly-supported research institutions and the beginnings of ecology, and since the 1960s, professional conservation research and management - were also happening nationally elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Access Plan – Central Station October 2020 Version 22 Issue Purpose: Sydney Metro Website – CSSI Coa E92 Approved Version Contents
    Interchange Access Plan – Central Station October 2020 Version 22 Issue Purpose: Sydney Metro Website – CSSI CoA E92 Approved Version Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................1 7.0 Central Station - interchange and 1.1 Sydney Metro .........................................................................1 transfer requirements overview ................ 20 1.2 Sydney Metro City & Southwest objectives ..............1 7.1 Walking interchange and transfer requirements ...21 1.3 Interchange Access Plan ..................................................1 7.2 Cycling interchange and transfer requirements ..28 1.4 Purpose of Plan ...................................................................1 7.3 Train interchange and transfer requirements ...... 29 7.4 Light rail interchange and transfer 2.0 Interchange and transfer planning .......2 requirements ........................................................................... 34 2.1 Customer-centred design ............................................... 2 7.5 Bus interchange and transfer requirements ........ 36 2.2 Sydney Metro customer principles............................. 2 7.6 Coach interchange and transfer requirements ... 38 2.3 An integrated customer journey .................................3 7.7 Vehicle drop-off interchange and 2.4 Interchange functionality and role .............................3 transfer requirements ..........................................................40 2.5 Modal hierarchy .................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Utsi Arrival Guide 2020
    International Student Guide Welcome Welcome to UTS and to Sydney! We are delighted that you have chosen UTS for your study abroad experience and we are committed to ensuring your time with us is as enriching and enjoyable as possible. Studying in a foreign country is a life- changing experience - it’s an opportunity to challenge yourself personally and academically. You’re now part of a diverse community of students, academics and staff from all over the world. Our students and staff come from 120 different countries, making our campus a vibrant and dynamic place to “At UTS, we believe study and socialise. learning goes beyond the At UTS, we believe learning goes beyond classroom. I encourage the classroom. I encourage you to try you to try something new something new during your time here. Challenge yourself by volunteering, joining during your time here.” a sport or social club, learning about entrepreneurship or signing up for our leadership and development programs – there’s something for everyone at UTS. One of the best aspects of studying abroad is getting to know your host country; however adjusting to life in a new country can be challenging. We offer a wide range of support services, from our on-campus medical centre to academic and career support, most of which are free. Remember, our friendly staff are here to support you at any time. Don’t be afraid to ask for help when you need it. I wish you all the best for an exciting and rewarding time in Sydney and at UTS. Iain Watt Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (International) Contents UTS student diversity Arriving at UTS 03 Starting at UTS 04 46,259 students 15,577 international students Starting at UTS 04 50% students speak a language Campus map 07 other than English Talks, tours and orientation events 08 The above numbers are approximate as of July 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • 11.11111.1111111111111!36 .111!"111111111111111111.11
    11.11111.1111111111111!36111!"111111111111111111.11. BOTAETICIL STUDIES BY CH.LRLES KERRY -a • a- rib • 1419, Woollybutt, 2.1onFifolia, Circumference, 33 ft. Height, 230 ft. 10 No. 2092, 1ild. Orange Tree, Capparis mitchellii. From C.Kerry Co.: Forest Flora : Photographs, ::::.Q634.9/K -637- STUDIES BY CHARLES KERRY No. 1418. Turpentine, Syncarpia glomulifera, C ircumference, 30 ft., Height, 200 ft. .00411144411110.VI. - Jait JP" . • • 4e No. 2089 "Gidyah .Trees", Gidgee, Acacia cambagei. From C.Kerry Co.: Forest Flora : Photographs, LI .Q634 9/K. -638- least until the end of the century, and the skill of men like Edward William Liinchen 382 was long respected and utilised, especially in the production of well--illustrated botanical works. 383 iv. Experimentalists. shown elsewhere, the search for a sta-_:le item of export prompted a thorough examination of the bush during the early years of settlement. The Governors who administered the Colony before the answer was found in wool encouraged investigations and experiments which might praise a supply of plant fibre, de-stuffs, tannin, gum 384 or timber. In the best Antipodean tradition, one of the earliest and most industrious botanical exeerimentalists was a convict, John 385 Hutchison, who in 1810 announced from a Portsmouth hulk that "experiments perfo red under a multitude of inconveniences not to be removed in a :lace of this description", had shown "Botany Bay Oak" to 386 be "one of the most valuable woods in the British Empire". To some, 382 E.1. i!iinchen (1852-1913) was born in Perth, but moved to gelbourne and came under the influence of Victorian artists during the 1860s.
    [Show full text]
  • 20121123-High-Line-Style-Project-For-Sydney-Aims-To-Deliver-The
    Shared by MatterofTrust.org, 11/23/2012 1 of 2 Celebrate Positive Environmental News with Us! High Line-Style Project for Sydney Aims to Deliver the Goods Source: earthtechling.com Published: November 22, 2012 By Susan DeFreitas Old railroads are all the rage when it comes to adaptive reuse. New York City kicked off the trend with its High Line park, which officially opened to the public last year. Now we’ve got Chicago’s long-anticipated rails-to-trails park system, the Bloomingdale Trail, set for completion in 2014, with plans for a smaller-scale but similar project being kicked around in Milwaukee. In London, city officials are contemplating the creation of a mushroom farm in the old, unused railroad tunnels beneath the city — and in Philly, officials are considering a subterranean addition to Reading Viaduct park, which will transform a stretch of the old Reading Railroad line into a pedestrian-friendly park and trail. But if you need any proof that the 21st century reclamation of the 19th century’s big innovation in transport is a global phenomenon at this point, look no further than The Goods Line, Sydney’s take on New York’s High Line, part of its Ultimo Pedestrian Network (UPN). image via Architecture and Design Australia Shared by MatterofTrust.org, 11/23/2012 2 of 2 Celebrate Positive Environmental News with Us! Architecture And Design Australia reports that Aspect Studios and Choi Ropiha Fighera have been selected by the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority to design and deliver the park, which will be built on the 500 meters (around 1640 feet) of industrial railway track that divides Ultimo from Haymarket.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the THA Website
    Annual Review 2015–16 Excellence in property and places for NSW Annual Reports Government Property NSW Dear Minister Letter of submission I am pleased to submit to you, for presentation to Parliament, an Annual Review of the activities of Property NSW for the period 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. Additionally, in accordance with the Annual Report (Statutory Bodies) Act 1984, I submit the Annual Reports and financial affairs of Government Property NSW, Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority and NSW Teacher Housing Authority for the same period. Brett Newman Martin Hoffman Deputy Secretary Secretary Property NSW Department of Finance, Services and Innovation Property NSW Annual Review 2015–16 Front cover: Colonial Secretary’s building, Macquarie Street, Sydney. This page: The Goods Line, Darling Harbour © Florian Groehn. Contents Property NSW Annual Review Appendices 02 Foreword from our 14 Our services and 37 Appendix A Deputy Secretary divisions Government Property NSW • F inancial statements 04 Our role 20 Our people • Statutory information 05 Our organisation 23 Our performance 91 Appendix B Sydney Harbour 06 Our work 24 Performance overview Foreshore Authority • The Sandstones • Commercial • Financial statements • Gosford revitalisation • Retail and statutory information: • Millers Point • Waste Sydney Harbour • Integrated outsourced • Housing Foreshore Authority asset management • Financial • Financial statements: • Relocations to Luna Park Reserve Trust Western Sydney 30 Environment and • Flexible teacher sustainability 183 Appendix C accommodation Teacher Housing • The Goods Line Authority of NSW • Financial statements • Statutory information 246 Index Under clause 6 of Schedule 5 of the Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation (Authorised Transaction) Act 2010, the Treasurer has designated that Waste Assets Management Corporation’s Annual Report be included with the Department of Finance, Service and Innovation’s Annual Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Stubbs, Brett J. "Forest Conservation and the Reciprocal Timber Trade Between New Zealand and New South Wales, 1880S–1920S." Environment and History 14, No
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Stubbs, Brett J. "Forest Conservation and the Reciprocal Timber Trade between New Zealand and New South Wales, 1880s–1920s." Environment and History 14, no. 4, Trans-Tasman Forest History special issue (November 2008): 497–522. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3353. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2008. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. Forest Conservation and the Reciprocal Timber Trade between New Zealand and New South Wales, 1880s–1920s BRETT J. STUBBS School of Environmental Science and Management Southern Cross University P.O. Box 157 Lismore, NSW, Australia, 2480 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT A substantial inter-colonial timber trade between hardwood-scarce New Zealand and softwood-scarce New South Wales developed in the late nineteenth century. The northern coastal area of New South Wales, that colonyʼs main timber-pro- ducing district, supplied mainly ironbark (Eucalyptus paniculata, E. crebra and E. siderophloia) for use in New Zealandʼs railways, bridges and wharves. North-eastern New South Wales was also that colonyʼs most important dairying district, and kahikatea (Dacrycarpus dacrydioides), a New Zealand softwood timber, was imported for the manufacture of butter boxes. The magnitude of this two-way trade created domestic timber shortages on both sides of the Tasman Sea, and stimulated conservation efforts from the early years of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]