DOCSLIB.ORG

Undermining Democratic Institutions and Splintering Nato: Russian Disinformation Aims

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Undermining Democratic Institutions and Splintering Nato: Russian Disinformation Aims UNDERMINING DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND SPLINTERING NATO: RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION AIMS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 9, 2017 Serial No. 115–7 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ or http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 24–584PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:35 Apr 07, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 Z:\WORK\_FULL\030917\24584 SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS EDWARD R. ROYCE, California, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOE WILSON, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida TED POE, Texas KAREN BASS, California DARRELL E. ISSA, California WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina AMI BERA, California MO BROOKS, Alabama LOIS FRANKEL, Florida PAUL COOK, California TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas RON DESANTIS, Florida ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BRENDAN F. BOYLE, Pennsylvania TED S. YOHO, Florida DINA TITUS, Nevada ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois NORMA J. TORRES, California LEE M. ZELDIN, New York BRADLEY SCOTT SCHNEIDER, Illinois DANIEL M. DONOVAN, JR., New York THOMAS R. SUOZZI, New York F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York Wisconsin TED LIEU, California ANN WAGNER, Missouri BRIAN J. MAST, Florida FRANCIS ROONEY, Florida BRIAN K. FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania THOMAS A. GARRETT, JR., Virginia AMY PORTER, Chief of Staff THOMAS SHEEHY, Staff Director JASON STEINBAUM, Democratic Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:35 Apr 07, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 Z:\WORK\_FULL\030917\24584 SHIRL C O N T E N T S Page WITNESSES His Excellency Toomas Hendrik Ilves (former President of the Republic of Estonia) ................................................................................................................. 5 The Honorable Lincoln P. Bloomfield, Jr., chairman emeritus and distin- guished fellow, The Stimson Center (former Assistant Secretary for Political Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State) ...................................................... 16 Mr. Peter B. Doran, executive vice president, Center for European Policy Analysis ................................................................................................................. 25 The Honorable Daniel Baer (former U.S. Representative to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) ........................................................... 30 LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING His Excellency Toomas Hendrik Ilves: Prepared statement ................................ 7 The Honorable Lincoln P. Bloomfield, Jr.: Prepared statement .......................... 18 Mr. Peter B. Doran: Prepared statement .............................................................. 27 The Honorable Daniel Baer: Prepared statement ................................................. 32 APPENDIX Hearing notice .......................................................................................................... 92 Hearing minutes ...................................................................................................... 93 Mr. Peter B. Doran: Material submitted for the record ....................................... 95 The Honorable Scott Perry, a Representative in Congress from the Common- wealth of Pennsylvania: Material submitted for the record ............................. 101 The Honorable Brad Sherman, a Representative in Congress from the State of California: Material submitted for the record ............................................... 104 The Honorable Thomas A. Garrett, Jr., a Representative in Congress from the Commonwealth of Virginia: Material submitted for the record ................ 108 The Honorable David Cicilline, a Representative in Congress from the State of Rhode Island: Report entitled ‘‘Background to ‘Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections’: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attri- bution’’ ............................................................................................................... 111 Washington Post articles ..................................................................................... 114 The Honorable Gerald E. Connolly, a Representative in Congress from the Commonwealth of Virginia: Prepared statement .............................................. 117 Written responses from the witnesses to questions submitted for the record by the Honorable Ann Wagner, a Representative in Congress from the State of Missouri .................................................................................................. 119 (III) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:35 Apr 07, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 Z:\WORK\_FULL\030917\24584 SHIRL VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:35 Apr 07, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 Z:\WORK\_FULL\030917\24584 SHIRL UNDERMINING DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND SPLINTERING NATO: RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION AIMS THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 2017 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:05 a.m., in room 2172 Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Edward Royce (chair- man of the committee) presiding. Chairman ROYCE. This hearing will come to order. This morning we examine Russia’s systematic attempts to under- mine and discredit Western democratic institutions, with one goal being to splinter the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. In January, the U.S. intelligence community produced a report which found that ‘‘Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an in- fluence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. Presidential election.’’ Thankfully, there is no evidence to suggest Russia interfered in our voting and tallying process. But Members of Congress rightfully have many more questions surrounding Russian meddling. So it is appropriate that the intelligence committees, on a bipartisan basis, are working to get to the bottom of this. We need answers. And we need to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Indeed, the intelligence community reports warn that ‘‘Moscow will apply lessons learned to future influence efforts worldwide, in- cluding against U.S. allies and their election processes.’’ Here in the U.S., our midterm elections will be here before we know it. And with elections on the horizon in France, Germany, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and Italy, European intelligence services are sounding the alarm about Russian attempts to skew the outcome with targeted disinformation and propaganda. In France, for exam- ple, one pro-European candidate has reportedly been the subject of ‘‘hundreds and even thousands’’ of hacking attempts against his party, and outlets such as RT and Sputnik spread disinformation to undermine his candidacy. This isn’t new. The committee is joined today by Toomas Ilves, a former Estonian President—welcome, Mr. President—who led his country as Russia inflamed ethnic passions and directed disinformation and cyberattacks against Estonia. Russia’s media war against the Baltic states goes back over a decade. What is new is that Russian disinformation has been growing in sophistication, intensity, reach, and impact. According to the Cen- ter for European Policy Analysis—also represented here today— (1) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:35 Apr 07, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 Z:\WORK\_FULL\030917\24584 SHIRL 2 ‘‘Russia’s information warfare does not crudely promote the Krem- lin’s agenda, instead it is calibrated to confuse, befuddle, and dis- tract.’’ They go on to note that ‘‘Russia aims to erode public support for Euro-Atlantic values in order to increase its own relative power.’’ Russia has deployed its arsenal of trolls, propaganda, and false information to a new level. These techniques have even be- come enshrined in official Kremlin doctrine. Moscow’s strategic objective is to break apart the NATO alliance and, thus, to boost Russian geopolitical influence in Western Eu- rope. The stakes are high: If Kremlin-backed politicians take power in France, it could potentially spell the end of the European Union. Even for those who might approve of that development, I think we can all agree the future of the EU should be left to the Euro- peans—not manipulators in Moscow. So how do we push back? Last Congress, when this committee held a hearing on Russia’s ‘‘weaponization of information,’’ U.S. international broadcasters were on the air with a near 30-minute television news program in the Russian language called Current Time. Now, 2 years later, this Russian language show is running 6 hours of live programming daily—but still cannot provide data on target audience and market penetration. In December, the Presi- dent signed legislation authored by myself and Mr. Engel—and pushed by this committee—to empower a CEO to run all U.S. international broadcasting. The CEO
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Argumentation and Fallacies in Creationist Writings Against Evolutionary Theory Petteri Nieminen1,2* and Anne-Mari Mustonen1
    Nieminen and Mustonen Evolution: Education and Outreach 2014, 7:11 http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/7/1/11 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against evolutionary theory Petteri Nieminen1,2* and Anne-Mari Mustonen1 Abstract Background: The creationist–evolutionist conflict is perhaps the most significant example of a debate about a well-supported scientific theory not readily accepted by the public. Methods: We analyzed creationist texts according to type (young earth creationism, old earth creationism or intelligent design) and context (with or without discussion of “scientific” data). Results: The analysis revealed numerous fallacies including the direct ad hominem—portraying evolutionists as racists, unreliable or gullible—and the indirect ad hominem, where evolutionists are accused of breaking the rules of debate that they themselves have dictated. Poisoning the well fallacy stated that evolutionists would not consider supernatural explanations in any situation due to their pre-existing refusal of theism. Appeals to consequences and guilt by association linked evolutionary theory to atrocities, and slippery slopes to abortion, euthanasia and genocide. False dilemmas, hasty generalizations and straw man fallacies were also common. The prevalence of these fallacies was equal in young earth creationism and intelligent design/old earth creationism. The direct and indirect ad hominem were also prevalent in pro-evolutionary texts. Conclusions: While the fallacious arguments are irrelevant when discussing evolutionary theory from the scientific point of view, they can be effective for the reception of creationist claims, especially if the audience has biases. Thus, the recognition of these fallacies and their dismissal as irrelevant should be accompanied by attempts to avoid counter-fallacies and by the recognition of the context, in which the fallacies are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pedagogical Dimension of Indoctrination: Criticism of Indoctrination and the Constructivism in Education
    META: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy – IV (1) / 2012 META: RESEARCH IN HERMENEUTICS, PHENOMENOLOGY, AND PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY VOL. IV, NO. 1 / JUNE 2012: 88-105, ISSN 2067-3655, www.metajournal.org The Pedagogical Dimension of Indoctrination: Criticism of Indoctrination and the Constructivism in Education Mariana Momanu “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași Abstract This study proposes a critical analysis of indoctrination in the field of education. We shall first discuss the meaning of this word trying to identify two fundamental dimensions: the pedagogical dimension and the ideological one. After approaching the relationship between indoctrination and authority in education, we classify the types of indoctrination identified by O. Reboul (1977) based on these two dimensions. For the analysis of indoctrination in the teaching process we used a four-dimensional model that includes: the intention, teaching contents, teaching methods and finalities of the didactic process. The study concludes with criticisms of indoctrination in terms of the constructivist paradigm in education. We consider that, far from having achieved the single possible approach, the constructivism is an option for educating the critical spirit and preventing the risks of indoctrination within the teaching process. Keywords: indoctrination, authority, teaching, criticism of indoctrination, constructivist approach. 1. The Concept of Indoctrination. The Pedagogical Dimension of Indoctrination The initial meaning of indoctrination is of pedagogical nature. In Latin, Doctrina means education, science, doctrine, that can many times substitute one for another. The former meaning of doctrine was savoir or acquired knowledge (Robert 1957, 1564), while that of the verb to indoctrinate was: to instruct, to provide someone with knowledge, to teach a science (Robert 1957, 1564).
    [Show full text]
  • From Logic to Rhetoric: a Contextualized Pedagogy for Fallacies
    Current Issue From the Editors Weblog Editorial Board Editorial Policy Submissions Archives Accessibility Search Composition Forum 32, Fall 2015 From Logic to Rhetoric: A Contextualized Pedagogy for Fallacies Anne-Marie Womack Abstract: This article reenvisions fallacies for composition classrooms by situating them within rhetorical practices. Fallacies are not formal errors in logic but rather persuasive failures in rhetoric. I argue fallacies are directly linked to successful rhetorical strategies and pose the visual organizer of the Venn diagram to demonstrate that claims can achieve both success and failure based on audience and context. For example, strong analogy overlaps false analogy and useful appeal to pathos overlaps manipulative emotional appeal. To advance this argument, I examine recent changes in fallacies theory, critique a-rhetorical textbook approaches, contextualize fallacies within the history and theory of rhetoric, and describe a methodology for rhetorically reclaiming these terms. Today, fallacy instruction in the teaching of written argument largely follows two paths: teachers elevate fallacies as almost mathematical formulas for errors or exclude them because they don’t fit into rhetorical curriculum. Both responses place fallacies outside the realm of rhetorical inquiry. Fallacies, though, are not as clear-cut as the current practice of spotting them might suggest. Instead, they rely on the rhetorical situation. Just as it is an argument to create a fallacy, it is an argument to name a fallacy. This article describes an approach in which students must justify naming claims as successful strategies and/or fallacies, a process that demands writing about contexts and audiences rather than simply linking terms to obviously weak statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Propaganda Fitzmaurice
    Propaganda Fitzmaurice Propaganda Katherine Fitzmaurice Brock University Abstract This essay looks at how the definition and use of the word propaganda has evolved throughout history. In particular, it examines how propaganda and education are intrinsically linked, and the implications of such a relationship. Propaganda’s role in education is problematic as on the surface, it appears to serve as a warning against the dangers of propaganda, yet at the same time it disseminates the ideology of a dominant political power through curriculum and practice. Although propaganda can easily permeate our thoughts and actions, critical thinking and awareness can provide the best defense against falling into propaganda’s trap of conformity and ignorance. Keywords: propaganda, education, indoctrination, curriculum, ideology Katherine Fitzmaurice is a Master’s of Education (M.Ed.) student at Brock University. She is currently employed in the private business sector and is a volunteer with several local educational organizations. Her research interests include adult literacy education, issues of access and equity for marginalized adults, and the future and widening of adult education. Email: [email protected] 63 Brock Education Journal, 27(2), 2018 Propaganda Fitzmaurice According to the Oxford English Dictionary (OED, 2011) the word propaganda can be traced back to 1621-23, when it first appeared in “Congregatio de progapanda fide,” meaning “congregation for propagating the faith.” This was a mission, commissioned by Pope Gregory XV, to spread the doctrine of the Catholic Church to non-believers. At the time, propaganda was defined as “an organization, scheme, or movement for the propagation of a particular doctrine, practice, etc.” (OED).
    [Show full text]
  • Gorbachev and His Reforms
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 1986 Gorbachev and His Reforms Rett R. Ludwikowski The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Political Science Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation Rett R. Ludwikowski, Gorbachev and His Reforms, 30 MOD. AGE 120 (1986). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Estimating the chances of economic recovery of the Soviet Union Gorbachev and His Reforms Rett R. Ludwikowski IN THE LAST year the Western press has major policy address also freely ac- given a great deal of publicity to the new knowledged that the previous period had attempts at economic reform in the Soviet not solved the Soviet bloc’s most urgent Union. “Gorbachev Sets Shift in Econo- problems and declared his determination my,” “Gorbachev’s Vigor Holds Attention to fight against inefficiency in agriculture, of Soviets,’’ “Gorbachev Orders Wide ‘Re- drunkenness, corruption, the black mar- structuring’ of Soviet Economy”-these ket, the general disintegration of the com- are the titles of only a few articles which munist economy, and so forth. Some examine Gorbachev’s “breath-taking de- others mentioned that Andropov’s pre- termination to make changes in the decessors had made the same declara- Soviet economy.’’’ tions when first addressing the Central The general optimism as to the chances Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2017 No. 96 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was securing the beachhead. The countless Finally, in March 2016, after 64 years called to order by the Speaker pro tem- heroes who stormed the beaches of Nor- and extensive recovery efforts, Staff pore (Mr. BERGMAN). mandy on that fateful day 73 years ago Sergeant Van Fossen’s remains were f will never be forgotten. confirmed found and returned to his I had the honor of visiting this hal- home in Heber Springs, Arkansas. DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO lowed ground over Memorial Day, and I would like to extend my deepest TEMPORE while I was paying tribute to the brave condolences to the family of Staff Ser- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- soldiers who made the ultimate sac- geant Van Fossen and hope that they fore the House the following commu- rifice at the Normandy American Cem- are now able to find peace that he is fi- nication from the Speaker: etery and Memorial, an older French- nally home and in his final resting man by the name of Mr. Vonclair ap- place. WASHINGTON, DC, proached me simply wanting to honor June 6, 2017. CONWAY BIKESHARE PROGRAM I hereby appoint the Honorable JACK his liberators. He said that he just Mr. HILL. Mr. Speaker, last month BERGMAN to act as Speaker pro tempore on wanted to thank an American.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela's Tragic Meltdown Hearing
    VENEZUELA’S TRAGIC MELTDOWN HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 28, 2017 Serial No. 115–13 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ or http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 24–831PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:45 May 02, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\_WH\032817\24831 SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS EDWARD R. ROYCE, California, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOE WILSON, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida TED POE, Texas KAREN BASS, California DARRELL E. ISSA, California WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina AMI BERA, California MO BROOKS, Alabama LOIS FRANKEL, Florida PAUL COOK, California TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas RON DESANTIS, Florida ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BRENDAN F. BOYLE, Pennsylvania TED S. YOHO, Florida DINA TITUS, Nevada ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois NORMA J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transatlantic Partnership and Relations with Russia
    The Transatlantic Partnership and Relations with Russia Edited by Frances G. Burwell & Svante E. Cornell The Transatlantic Partnership and Relations with Russia Frances G. Burwell Svante E. Cornell Editors © 2012 Institute for Security and Development Policy and the Atlantic Council of the United States “The Transatlantic Partnership and Relations with Russia” is a monograph published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy in cooperation with the Atlantic Council of the United States. The Institute for Security and Development Policy is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. Through its Silk Road Studies Program, the Institute also runs a joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center with the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. The Institute is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. Since its founding in 1961-1962, the Atlantic Council of the United States has been a preeminent, non partisan institution devoted to promoting transatlantic cooperation and international security. Now in its 50th year, the Atlantic Council is harnessing that history of transatlantic leadership and applying its founders’ vision to a broad spectrum of modern global challenges from violent extremism to financial instability and from NATO’s future to energy security. The Council is home to ten programs and centers, broken down both functionally and regionally, which seamlessly work together to tackle today’s unique set of challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • April 24, 2020 (Florida Federal Qualifying) Report
    2020 Florida Federal Candidate Qualifying Report / Finance Reports Cumulative Totals through March 31, 2020 Office Currently Elected Challenger Party Contributions Expenditures Total COH CD01 Matt Gaetz REP $ 1,638,555.81 $ 1,284,221.76 $ 496,295.82 CD01 Phil Ehr DEM $ 342,943.79 $ 188,474.53 $ 154,469.26 CD01 Greg Merk REP $ - $ - $ - CD01 John Mills REP $ 5,000.00 $ 5,132.61 $ 145.02 CD01 Albert Oram* NPA CD02 Neal Dunn REP $ 297,532.04 $ 264,484.41 $ 419,201.78 CD02 Kim O'Connor* WRI CD02 Kristy Thripp* WRI CD03 OPEN - Ted Yoho REP CD03 Kat Cammack REP $ 207,007.59 $ 41,054.05 $ 165,953.54 CD03 Ryan Chamberlin REP $ 101,333.00 $ 4,025.39 $ 97,307.61 CD03 Todd Chase REP $ 163,621.68 $ 27,032.07 $ 136,589.61 CD03 Adam Christensen DEM $ - $ - $ - CD03 Philip Dodds DEM $ 6,301.17 $ 4,035.13 $ 2,266.04 CD03 Bill Engelbrecht REP $ 27,050.00 $ 4,955.94 $ 22,094.06 CD03 Joe Dallas Millado* REP CD03 Gavin Rollins REP $ 106,370.00 $ 9,730.33 $ 96,639.67 CD03 Judson Sapp REP $ 430,233.01 $ 120,453.99 $ 310,011.88 CD03 Ed Silva* WRI CD03 James St. George REP $ 400,499.60 $ 64,207.88 $ 336,291.72 CD03 David Theus REP $ 6,392.11 $ 473.58 $ 5,918.53 CD03 Amy Pope Wells REP $ 56,982.45 $ 46,896.17 $ 10,086.28 CD03 Tom Wells DEM $ 1,559.31 $ 1,289.68 $ 295.58 CD04 John Rutherford REP $ 513,068.32 $ 281,060.16 $ 597,734.31 CD04 Erick Aguilar REP $ 11,342.00 $ 6,220.00 $ 5,122.00 CD04 Donna Deegan DEM $ 425,901.36 $ 165,436.85 $ 260,464.51 CD04 Gary Koniz* WRI CD05 Al Lawson DEM $ 355,730.10 $ 168,874.69 $ 201,527.67 CD05 Gary Adler REP $ 40,325.00 $ 920.08 $ 39,404.92 CD05 Albert Chester DEM $ 43,230.65 $ 28,044.61 $ 15,186.04 CD05 Roger Wagoner REP $ - $ - $ - CD06 Michael Waltz REP $ 1,308,541.18 $ 626,699.95 $ 733,402.64 CD06 Clint Curtis DEM $ 13,503.79 $ 1,152.12 $ 12,351.67 CD06 Alan Grayson WRI $ 69,913.27 $ 56,052.54 $ 716,034.49 CD06 John.
    [Show full text]
  • 115Th Congress Roster.Xlsx
    State-District 114th Congress 115th Congress 114th Congress Alabama R D AL-01 Bradley Byrne (R) Bradley Byrne (R) 248 187 AL-02 Martha Roby (R) Martha Roby (R) AL-03 Mike Rogers (R) Mike Rogers (R) 115th Congress AL-04 Robert Aderholt (R) Robert Aderholt (R) R D AL-05 Mo Brooks (R) Mo Brooks (R) 239 192 AL-06 Gary Palmer (R) Gary Palmer (R) AL-07 Terri Sewell (D) Terri Sewell (D) Alaska At-Large Don Young (R) Don Young (R) Arizona AZ-01 Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Tom O'Halleran (D) AZ-02 Martha McSally (R) Martha McSally (R) AZ-03 Raúl Grijalva (D) Raúl Grijalva (D) AZ-04 Paul Gosar (R) Paul Gosar (R) AZ-05 Matt Salmon (R) Matt Salmon (R) AZ-06 David Schweikert (R) David Schweikert (R) AZ-07 Ruben Gallego (D) Ruben Gallego (D) AZ-08 Trent Franks (R) Trent Franks (R) AZ-09 Kyrsten Sinema (D) Kyrsten Sinema (D) Arkansas AR-01 Rick Crawford (R) Rick Crawford (R) AR-02 French Hill (R) French Hill (R) AR-03 Steve Womack (R) Steve Womack (R) AR-04 Bruce Westerman (R) Bruce Westerman (R) California CA-01 Doug LaMalfa (R) Doug LaMalfa (R) CA-02 Jared Huffman (D) Jared Huffman (D) CA-03 John Garamendi (D) John Garamendi (D) CA-04 Tom McClintock (R) Tom McClintock (R) CA-05 Mike Thompson (D) Mike Thompson (D) CA-06 Doris Matsui (D) Doris Matsui (D) CA-07 Ami Bera (D) Ami Bera (D) (undecided) CA-08 Paul Cook (R) Paul Cook (R) CA-09 Jerry McNerney (D) Jerry McNerney (D) CA-10 Jeff Denham (R) Jeff Denham (R) CA-11 Mark DeSaulnier (D) Mark DeSaulnier (D) CA-12 Nancy Pelosi (D) Nancy Pelosi (D) CA-13 Barbara Lee (D) Barbara Lee (D) CA-14 Jackie Speier (D) Jackie
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Connections a Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations
    Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations China-Russia Relations: Mounting Challenges and Multilateralism Yu Bin Wittenberg University China-Russia economic relations were “reset” on New Year’s Day 2011 when the 1,000-km Skovorodino-Daqing branch pipeline was officially opened. The pipeline, which took some 15 years from conception to completion, will transport 15 million tons of crude annually for the next 20 years. The low-key ceremony marking the launch of the pipeline at the Chinese border city of Mohe was followed by several rounds of bilateral consultations on diplomatic and strategic issues in January. In March and April, Moscow and Beijing sought to invigorate their “joint ventures” – the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and the Brazil, Russia, India, China (BRIC) forum – at a time when both Moscow and Beijing feel the need for more coordination to address several regional and global challenges and crises. Fifth round of China-Russia Strategic Security Talks Chinese State Councilor Dai Bingguo visited Moscow on Jan. 23-25 to attend the fifth round of China-Russia Strategic Security Talks with his Russian counterpart Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev. Chinese media reported that Dai had an “in-depth exchange” of views with the Russians on “important international and regional issues of common concern.” The talks were initiated in 2005 and the first round of consultations took place in Beijing in December 2009, when Russia and China signed a protocol on strategic security cooperation. The next round is scheduled to be held later this year in China. There were several major issues for this round of the bilateral security talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Woolley, President, Research!America
    Your Role in Changing Hearts and Minds for Science Mary Woolley, President and CEO, Research!America November 16, 2018 Health Science Center, University of Florida Research!America’s Mission Making research to improve health a higher national priority Research!America is an innovator in advocacy for research Research!America: 29 Years of Putting Research on the Public Agenda • Nonprofit alliance with member organizations drawn from academia, independent research institutes, industry, patient organizations and scientific societies representing more than 125 million Americans • Distinguished, all-volunteer board includes former elected and appointed officials, media and public relations leaders, and leaders from alliance member organizations • Four ‘sister’ organizations in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Sweden University of Florida Is Helping Researchers Change Hearts and Minds • Community Data Dashboard • Mobile Outreach Clinic • Health at Work Program • Classes and Seminars • Women’s Programs • Arts in Medicine Winning Hearts and Minds for Research: aka, Advocacy • Build relationships • Share your passion • Offer evidence • Make regular engagement and public outreach the new normal No one who cares about the future of health can afford to ‘outsource’ advocacy; get involved! Advocacy Works! • Doubled the NIH budget in five years, ‘99-‘03 • Included $10.4 billion in ARRA funding for NIH ’09-’10 • Secured $2 billion increase for NIH in FY16, FY17, and FY19 • Secured $3 billion increase for NIH in FY18 st • Secured passage of 21 Century
    [Show full text]