DOCSLIB.ORG

Bar Review April 01 25.04

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bar Review April 01 25.04 The BarJournal of the Bar of IrelandReview .Volume 10 . Issue 5 . November 2005 • Can Ethics be Competitive • WhoWho’ll’ll bebe thethe JudgesJudges • The Division of Marital Assets in Ample Resource Cases The BarVolumeReview 10,Issue 5, November 2005, ISSN 1339 - 3426 Contents 142 Changes to the Code of Conduct Hugh Mohan SC 144 Can Ethics be Competitive? Editorial Correspondence to: Paul Gallagher SC Eilis Brennan BL, 151 Reflections on the Role of Law The Editor, Bar Review, Bishop Donal McKeown Law Library, Four Courts, 152 Continuing Professional Development. Dublin 7 Inga Ryan CPD Manager DX 813154 Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 153 You Be the Judge Fax: 353-1-872 0455 Jennifer Carroll e-mail: [email protected] Editor: Eilis Brennan BL 155 Legal Update: Editorial Board: A Guide to Legal Developments from Paul Gallagher SC (Chairman, Editorial Board) 15th July 2005 up to 7th October 2005. Gerry Durcan SC Mary O’Toole SC Patrick Dillon Malone BL 173 The Division of Marital Assets in "Ample Resource" Cases Conor Dignam BL Inge Clissmann SC and Paul Hutchinson BL Adele Murphy BL Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL Tom O’Malley BL Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere The Bar Review is published by Thomson Round Hall in association with The Bar Council of Ireland. Jeanne McDonagh For all subscription queries contact: Jerry Carroll Thomson Round Hall Consultant Editors 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Dermot Gleeson SC Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 Patrick MacEntee SC Email: [email protected] web: www.roundhall.ie Thomas McCann SC Subscriptions: January 2005 to December 2005 - 6 issues Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Annual Subscription: €188.00 Donal O’Donnell SC Annual Subscription + Bound Volume Service €288.00 Garrett Cooney SC Pat Hanratty SC For all advertising queries contact: Directories Unit. Sweet & Maxwell James O’Reilly SC Telephone: + 44 20 7393 7000 Gerard Hogan SC James Nugent SC The Bar Review November 2005 Design: the Design Room T: 497 9022 Cover Illustration: Brian Gallagher T: 497 3389 E: [email protected] W: www.bdgart.com November 2005 - Page 141 Opinion Changes to the Code of Conduct Hugh Mohan SC The Competition Authority and Bar Council both believe in an The Bar Council wishes to encourage transparency and competition in independent referral Bar. The report and the chairman of the respect of fees. It recommends all clients of the Bar to seek Competition Authority endorse this and accept it is both necessary and comparisons of fees for their legal work and recommends the issuing good for a democratic society. Likewise, we agree that the Bar must be of fee estimates, where possible, prior to the commencement of work. competitive and pro-consumer. The following reforms of the taxation of costs, which determines legal costs, are supported by the Bar Council, and would assist clients and Some of the Competition Authority's proposals will facilitate reduce their costs: competition and will not disadvantage the consumer. The Bar Council (a) Fees should be set on the basis of the work undertaken by each of would like to implement those proposals. Other proposals would senior and junior counsel and the value of that work to the client. undermine the independence of the referral Bar to the detriment of the (b) The Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform should consumer. The Bar has carefully considered these proposals, and where introduce legislation to permit persons other than solicitors be appropriate, has suggested alternative and more proportionate means appointed to the position of Taxing Master. by which those objectives can be achieved. This document details those (c) The Legal Costs Group established by the Minister for Justice, proposals. Equality and Law Reform should undertake a careful review the The Bar's independence is important, as in a democracy, the law serves current system. as a bulwark between the State and the citizen and protects the (d) Out-of-date provisions contained in Order 99 of the Rules of the Constitution and peoples' rights. A person, anywhere in the land, can Superior Courts should be revoked. take on the might of the State or big business, on an equal footing. (e) The process of taxation should be reformed to eliminate Exclusively commercial or competition standards cannot be applied to unnecessary delays in delivering results. the administration of justice. These standards are ill equipped to reflect (f) Additional Taxing Masters should be appointed to deal with the the value of equality of arms before the court and the need to protect level of work and to allow proper assessments to be carried out in those who cannot afford representation. accordance with the requirements of section 27 of the 1995 Act. (g) It is important that the taxation process should look at both the This is an on-going process of developing and modernising our rules value or worth of the work done and the necessity to carry out and Code of Conduct for the benefit of barristers, consumers and that work. Unnecessary costs should not be for the account of the businesses users and in the interests of increasing efficiency in the legal paying party. system. More detailed wording will be circulated to members in the (h) All taxations of costs should be centralised in one agency in the forthcoming months. Below, please find an over view of the changes State, with provision to allow Taxing Officers to travel around the proposed and the effects these will have. country to facilitate country practitioners. (i) The objections process should be examined. Objections should be Regulation dealt with by a different Taxing Master to the Taxing Master who heard the original taxation. It is felt that greater transparency and openness is needed in the (j) Appeals to the court should be dealt with by judges specifically complaints procedure to reassure clients that they are being treated assigned to reviews of taxation. fairly and equitably if they have a complaint. Complaints have always (l) A simple taxation process should be introduced to deal with cases been very low against the profession which signals that clients are where only a single item is in dispute or only a very small number happy with the work of their barristers. These changes will improve the of items are in dispute. A simple written process might well be complaints procedure if a problem does arise, in the interests of both appropriate in such cases. the barrister and their clients. Expansion of direct professional access. There will be more non-lawyers involved in the complaints process, with a majority on the Barristers Professional Conduct Tribunal and the It is proposed to extend the range of work available on a direct access Appeals Board of the Tribunal. An independent Ombudsman has been basis as much as possible, while preserving the independent referral requested to oversee the complaints procedure. Any person who is Bar. This includes increasing the number of organisations who have dissatisfied with the decision of the Appeals Board will have an DPA, developing the Small Claims Arbitration Scheme and increasing automatic right of referral of their complaint to an Ombudsman. the Voluntary Access Scheme, whereby barristers carry out opinion and litigation work for NGO's and charitable bodies on a free basis. A simple form in plain English will be placed on the website or sent out to complainants. This will give clear instructions on how to make a Advertising complaint. The new procedures will be explained in a plain English leaflet and available on the website of the Law Library and the subject of an information campaign. The procedures and assistance available Changes are proposed in relation to the way barristers advertise their for complainants will be clearly explained services, their experience and expertise and the fees which they charge. A directory of barristers' services (sent to every solicitors' firm in the Legal fees and taxation of costs country) and corresponding website profile will be provided offering detailed information about each barrister. Increased advertising should November 2005 - Page 142 Opinion not encourage litigation or contain misleading information or diminish Council is continually expanding the services made available to public confidence, but should enhance price transparency to the barristers and using its purchasing power to achieve significant cost benefit of business and consumers. savings for barristers, to the overall benefit of business and consumers. Switching professions Part-time Occupations There will be no rules restricting a solicitor from entering the barrister's The range of part-time occupations in which barristers may engage will profession, if they are qualified. This includes removing the rule which be expanded. prevents a solicitor, who has switched profession, taking work from any solicitor's firm with which that solicitor was previously associated. Appointment of Senior Counsel The Bar Council will support the establishment of clear and transparent Assisting new barristers to get established criteria for the appointment of barristers, on merit, to the rank of Changes should be made to make it easier for a barrister entering the Senior Counsel. There should be ongoing monitoring of quality and a procedure for withdrawing the mark in the event of a reduction in the profession to get established quickly. It is proposed that persons level of quality. entering the profession will be free to take work from former employers immediately and that they will be able to participate in an These proposed changes would significantly improve many aspects of expanded direct professional access scheme, as well as have significant the profession, and are proposed for the benefit of business users and freedom in advertising their fees, expertise and availability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Da´Il E´Ireann
    Vol. 580 Tuesday, No. 1 17 February 2004 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DA´ IL E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Tuesday, 17 February 2004. Ceisteanna—Questions Taoiseach ………………………………… 1 Minister for Finance Priority Questions …………………………… 14 Other Questions …………………………… 28 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 34 Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 35 Requests to move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 31 ……………… 42 Order of Business ……………………………… 43 Finance Bill 2004: Allocation of Time Motion …………………… 52 Ministerial Rota for Parliamentary Questions: Motion ………………… 53 Motor Vehicle (Duties and Licences) Bill 2004: Second Stage ……………… 54 Private Members’ Business Electronic Voting: Motion ………………………… 82 Motor Vehicle (Duties and Licences) Bill 2004: Second Stage (resumed)……………………………114 Referral to Select Committee ………………………… 139 Adjournment Debate Community Employment Schemes ……………………… 139 School Closures ……………………………… 142 Hepatitis C Incidence …………………………… 144 Social Welfare Benefits …………………………… 148 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 153 1 2 DA´ IL E´ IREANN DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL OFFICIAL REPORT Imleabhar 580 Volume 580 De´ Ma´irt, 17 Feabhra 2004. Tuesday, 17 February 2004. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 2.30 p.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Ceisteanna — Questions. 5. Mr. Rabbitte asked the Taoiseach if the Government has plans for the holding of ———— constitutional referenda during 2004; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [2892/04] Constitutional Amendments. 6. Mr. Rabbitte asked the Taoiseach the 1. Mr. Kenny asked the Taoiseach the progress made to date with regard to the constitutional referenda he intends to hold during implementation of the recommendations of the 2004; and if he will make a statement on the Oireachtas committee on the Constitution; and if matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bar Review July 2006 Design: the Design Room T: 497 9022 Cover Illustration: Brian Gallagher T: 497 3389 E: [email protected] W
    The BarJournal of the Bar Reviewof Ireland .Volume 12 . Issue 4 . July 2006 • Environmental Impact Assessments and recent EU law • The Haran Report on Legal Costs • Eurofood and EU Insolvency regulation BarThe Review Volume 11,Issue 4, July 2006, ISSN 1339 - 3426 Contents 106 News 107 The Haran Report on Legal Costs Editorial Correspondence to: Colm O’Dwyer BL Eilis Brennan BL, The Editor, 111 Eurofood IFSC Limited: Judicial Clarification of Insolvency Bar Review, Regulation 1346/2000 Law Library, Glen Gibbons BL Four Courts, Dublin 7 Mark O’Riordan BL DX 813154 Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 Fax: 353-1-872 0455 e-mail: [email protected] 117 Legal Update: A Guide to Legal Developments from Editor: Eilis Brennan BL 4th May, 2006 to 23rd June, 2006. Editorial Board: Paul Gallagher SC 129 Development Consents and the EIA Directive (Chairman, Editorial Board) Garrett Simons BL Gerry Durcan SC Mary O’Toole SC 133 Misuse of Drugs provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill Patrick Dillon Malone BL Conor Dignam BL Gerard Murphy B.L. Adele Murphy BL 136 Lawyers in Afghanistan Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Jeanne McDonagh Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL 137 The Constitution and Marriage; The Scope of Protection Tom O’Malley BL John Eardly BL Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere The Bar Review is published by Thomson Round Hall in association with The Bar Council of Ireland. Jeanne McDonagh For all subscription queries contact: Jerry Carroll Thomson Round Hall Consultant Editors 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Dermot Gleeson SC Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 Patrick MacEntee SC Email: [email protected] web: www.roundhall.ie Thomas McCann SC Subscriptions: January 2006 to December 2006 - 6 issues Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Annual Subscription: E195.00 Donal O’Donnell SC E Annual Subscription + Bound Volume Service 300.00 Garrett Cooney SC For all advertising queries contact: Pat Hanratty SC Tom Clark, Direct line: 44 20 7393 7835 E-Mail: [email protected] James O’Reilly SC Directories Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Aguisíní Appendices Aguisín 1: Comóradh Céad Bliain Ollscoil Na Héireann Appendix 1: Centenary of the National University of Ireland
    Aguisíní Appendices Aguisín 1: Comóradh Céad Bliain Ollscoil na hÉireann Appendix 1: Centenary of the National University of Ireland Píosa reachtaíochta stairiúil ab ea Acht Ollscoileanna na hÉireann, 1908, a chuir deireadh go foirmeálta le tréimhse shuaite in oideachas tríú leibhéal na hEireann agus a d’oscail caibidil nua agus nuálaíoch: a bhunaigh dhá ollscoil ar leith – ceann amháin díobh i mBéal Feirste, in ionad sean-Choláiste na Ríona den Ollscoil Ríoga, agus an ceann eile lárnaithe i mBaile Átha Cliath, ollscoil fheidearálach ina raibh coláistí na hOllscoile Ríoga de Bhaile Átha Cliath, Corcaigh agus Gaillimh, athchumtha mar Chomh-Choláistí d’Ollscoil nua na hÉirean,. Sa bhliain 2008, rinne OÉ ceiliúradh ar chéad bliain ar an saol. Is iomaí athrú suntasach a a tharla thar na mblianta, go háiriithe nuair a ritheadh Acht na nOllscoileanna i 1997, a rinneadh na Comh-Choláistí i mBaile Átha Cliath, Corcaigh agus Gaillimh a athbhunú mar Chomh-Ollscoileanna, agus a rinneadh an Coláiste Aitheanta (Coláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad) a athstruchtúrú mar Ollscoil na hÉireann, Má Nuad – Comh-Ollscoil nua. Cuireadh tús le comóradh an chéid ar an 3 Nollaig 2007 agus chríochnaigh an ceiliúradh le mórchomhdháil agus bronnadh céime speisialta ar an 3 Nollaig 2008. Comóradh céad bliain ón gcéad chruinniú de Sheanad OÉ ar an lá céanna a nochtaíodh protráid den Seansailéirm, an Dr. Garret FitzGerald. Tá liosta de na hócáidí ar fad thíos. The Irish Universities Act 1908 was a historic piece of legislation, formally closing a turbulent chapter in Irish third level education and opening a new and innovational chapter: establishing two separate universities, one in Belfast, replacing the old Queen’s College of the Royal University, the other with its seat in Dublin, a federal university comprising the Royal University colleges of Dublin, Cork and Galway, re-structured as Constituent Colleges of the new National University of Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Public
    REPORT OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SYSTEM STUDY GROUP CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Public Prosecution System Study Group (PPSSG) was appointed by the government in October 1998 under the auspices of the Office of the Attorney General and was addressed by the Attorney, Mr David Byrne SC, at its first meeting on 2 November 1998. The Attorney outlined the background to the government’s decision to establish the group. Terms of reference 1.2 The terms of reference of the Study Group are: 1. To review the legal and organisational arrangements for the public prosecution system and, in particular, to consider o whether there is a continuing role for gardaí to prosecute as well as to investigate crime; o whether all prosecutions should be conducted by lawyers; o whether, and in what circumstances, prosecutions should be conducted by a. barristers or solicitors employed by the Director of Public Prosecutions as prosecutors, b. independent practitioners at the Bar, c. independent solicitors who have a contractualrelationship with the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Attorney General or his Office (including the Office of the Chief State Solicitor), d. solicitors employed by the Attorney General or his Office, e. members of the Garda Síochána; o whether there should be any changes in the functions of the Criminal Trials Section of the Chief State Solicitor’s Office and local State Solicitor’s Office, local State Solicitors and the Director of Public Prosecutions and his Office. 1. To consider whether aspects of the public prosecution system in comparable jurisdictions could, with advantage, be adopted here.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bar Review Volume 21
    THE BAR Volume 21 Number 2 REVIEWJournal of The Bar of Ireland April 2016 Unlawful detention CONTENTS The Bar Review The Bar of Ireland Distillery Building 145-151 Church Street Dublin DO7 WDX8 Direct: +353 (0)1 817 5166 Fax: +353 (0)1 817 5150 Email: [email protected] Web: www.lawlibrary.ie EDITORIAL BOARD 45 Editor Eilis Brennan BL Eileen Barrington SC 66 Gerard Durcan SC Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Niamh Hyland SC Brian Kennedy SC Patrick Leonard SC Paul Anthony McDermott SC Sara Moorhead SC Brian R Murray SC James O'Reilly SC Mary O'Toole SC Mark Sanfey SC 56 Claire Bruton BL Diane Duggan BL Claire Hogan BL Grainne Larkin BL Mark O'Connell BL Thomas O'Malley BL Ciara Murphy, Director Shirley Coulter, Director, Comms and Policy Vanessa Curley, Law Library Deirdre Lambe, Law Library Rose Fisher, PA to the Director Tom Cullen, Publisher Paul O'Grady, Publisher PUBLISHERS Published on behalf of The Bar of Ireland 54 59 48 by Think Media Ltd Editorial: Ann-Marie Hardiman Paul O’Grady Colm Quinn Message from the Chairman 44 Interview 56 Design: Tony Byrne Tom Cullen Moving on Ruth O’Sullivan Editor's note 45 Niamh Short Advertising: Paul O’Grady Law in practice 59 News 45 Commercial matters and news items relating Damages for unlawful judicial jailing 59 to The Bar Review should be addressed to: Launch of Bar of Ireland 1916 exhibition Controlling the market 62 Paul O’Grady Bar of Ireland Transition Year Programme The Bar Review Report from The Bar of Ireland Annual Conference 2016 The Battle of the Four Courts, 1916 66 Think Media Ltd The
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee Policies from 1933 Until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities
    Refugee Policies from 1933 until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities ihra_4_fahnen.indd 1 12.02.2018 15:59:41 IHRA series, vol. 4 ihra_4_fahnen.indd 2 12.02.2018 15:59:41 International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (Ed.) Refugee Policies from 1933 until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities Edited by Steven T. Katz and Juliane Wetzel ihra_4_fahnen.indd 3 12.02.2018 15:59:42 With warm thanks to Toby Axelrod for her thorough and thoughtful proofreading of this publication, to the Ambassador Liviu-Petru Zăpirțan and sta of the Romanian Embassy to the Holy See—particularly Adina Lowin—without whom the conference would not have been possible, and to Katya Andrusz, Communications Coordinator at the Director’s Oce of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. ISBN: 978-3-86331-392-0 © 2018 Metropol Verlag + IHRA Ansbacher Straße 70 10777 Berlin www.metropol-verlag.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten Druck: buchdruckerei.de, Berlin ihra_4_fahnen.indd 4 12.02.2018 15:59:42 Content Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust ........................................... 9 About the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) .................................................... 11 Preface .................................................... 13 Steven T. Katz, Advisor to the IHRA (2010–2017) Foreword The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, the Holy See and the International Conference on Refugee Policies ... 23 omas Michael Baier/Veerle Vanden Daelen Opening Remarks ......................................... 31 Mihnea Constantinescu, IHRA Chair 2016 Opening Remarks ......................................... 35 Paul R. Gallagher Keynote Refugee Policies: Challenges and Responsibilities ........... 41 Silvano M. Tomasi FROM THE 1930s TO 1945 Wolf Kaiser Introduction ............................................... 49 Susanne Heim The Attitude of the US and Europe to the Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bar Review April 01 25.04
    The BarJournal of the Bar of IrelandReview .Volume 10 . Issue 6 .December 2005 • A Comment on the Maritime Safety Act, 2005 • Barristers and Immunity from Suit • Delay in Sexual Offence Cases BarThe Review Volume 10,Issue 6, December 2005, ISSN 1339 - 3426 Contents 182 You Be the Judge Part II Jennifer Carroll Editorial Correspondence to: Eilis Brennan BL, 189 A Comment on the Maritime Safety Act, 2005. The Editor, Glen Gibbons BL Bar Review, Law Library, Four Courts, Dublin 7 193 Legal Update: DX 813154 A Guide to Legal Developments from Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 Fax: 353-1-872 0455 10th October 2005 up to 22nd November 2005. e-mail: [email protected] Editor: Eilis Brennan BL 209 A Bar to Recovery? Barristers, Public Policy, and Immunity from Suit Editorial Board: Paul Gallagher SC Ray Ryan BL and Des Ryan (Chairman, Editorial Board) 214 Clarifying The Law On Delayed Prosecutions For Sexual Offences Gerry Durcan SC Brian Conroy BL Mary O’Toole SC Patrick Dillon Malone BL 218 The Central Criminal Court - The Limerick Experience Conor Dignam BL Adele Murphy BL The Honourable Mr. Justice Paul Carney Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL Tom O’Malley BL Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere The Bar Review is published by Thomson Round Hall in association with The Bar Council of Ireland. Jeanne McDonagh For all subscription queries contact: Jerry Carroll Thomson Round Hall Consultant Editors 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Dermot Gleeson SC Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 Patrick MacEntee SC Email: [email protected] web: www.roundhall.ie Thomas McCann SC Subscriptions: January 2005 to December 2005 - 6 issues Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Annual Subscription: E188.00 Donal O’Donnell SC Annual Subscription + Bound Volume Service E288.00 Garrett Cooney SC Pat Hanratty SC For all advertising queries contact: Directories Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cta Œ Cumenica
    2020 N. 2 ACTA 2020 ŒCUMENICA INFORMATION SERVICE OF THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN UNITY e origin of the Pontical Council for Promoting Christian Unity is closely linked with the Second Vatican Council. On 5 June 1960, Saint Pope John XXIII established a ‘Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity’ as one of the preparatory commissions for the Council. In 1966, Saint Pope Paul VI conrmed the Secretariat as a permanent dicastery CUMENICA of the Holy See. In 1974, a Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews was established within the Secretariat. In 1988, Saint Pope John Paul II changed the Secretariats status to Pontical Council. Œ e Pontical Council is entrusted with promoting an authentic ecumenical spirit in the Catholic Church based on the principles of Unitatis redintegratio and the guidelines of its Ecumenical Directory rst published in 1967, and later reissued in 1993. e Pontical Council also promotes Christian unity by strengthening relationships CTA with other Churches and Ecclesial Communities, particularly through A theological dialogue. e Pontical Council appoints Catholic observers to various ecumenical gatherings and in turn invites observers or ‘fraternal delegates’ of other Churches or Ecclesial Communities to major events of the Catholic Church. Front cover Detail of the icon of the two holy Apostles and brothers Peter and Andrew, symbolizing the Churches of the East and of the West and the “brotherhood rediscovered” (UUS 51) N. 2 among Christians on their way towards unity. (Original at the Pontical
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in the Republic of Ireland
    Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in the Republic of Ireland INTRODUCTION The practice of pro bono is continuing to grow and develop in the Republic of Ireland (“Ireland”) and there are high levels of enthusiasm for pro bono opportunities among the legal profession. Nevertheless, there remains room for expansion in the provision of pro bono services, with Ireland arguably lagging behind several other comparable common law countries. OVERVIEW OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM Constitution and Governing Laws Ireland has a parliamentary democracy, with the President of Ireland elected directly by the people as its head of state,1 and is a common law jurisdiction, derived from the English legal system. Irish courts are bound by precedent.2 As a member of the European Union (the “EU”), Ireland’s legal system is also influenced significantly by EU law, with certain provisions having “direct effect” and thus being directly enforceable in Irish courts.3 The Courts Ireland has a tiered court structure with the Supreme Court at the top, serving as the court of final appeal in civil and criminal matters. Beneath the Supreme Court is the Court of Appeal,4 and then the High Court, Circuit Court (with appeals going to the High Court) and, at the bottom of the structure, the District Court. The courts have jurisdiction over all civil and criminal matters with the District Court dealing with the most minor civil and criminal cases.5 Some specialist matters, such as employment and social welfare cases, are dealt with by tribunals, which are similar to courts but aim to be less expensive and formal.6 Judges for all courts are appointed by the President of Ireland upon the recommendation of the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board (the “Board”).7 Persons seeking to be appointed as judges must apply to the Board, with the Board then making submissions to the Minister for Justice who, in turn, advises the 1 See http://www.president.ie/en/the-president/constitutional-role (last visited on September 4, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Visit to NUI Galway 4-6 March, 2019 Welcoming the Supreme Court to NUI Galway
    Supreme Court Visit to NUI Galway 4-6 March, 2019 Welcoming the Supreme Court to NUI Galway 4-6 March, 2019 Table of Contents Welcome from the Head of School . 2 Te School of Law at NUI Galway . 4 Te Supreme Court of Ireland . 6 Te Judges of the Supreme Court . 8 2 Welcome from the Head of School We are greatly honoured to host the historic sittings of the Irish Supreme Court at NUI Galway this spring. Tis is the frst time that the Supreme Court will sit outside of a courthouse since the Four Courts reopened in 1932, the frst time the court sits in Galway, and only its third time to sit outside of Dublin. To mark the importance of this occasion, we are running a series of events on campus for the public and for our students. I would like to thank the Chief Justice and members of the Supreme Court for participating in these events and for giving their time so generously. Dr Charles O’Mahony, Head of School, NUI Galway We are particularly grateful for the Supreme Court’s willingness to engage with our students. As one of Ireland’s leading Law Schools, our key focus is on the development of both critical thinking and adaptability in our future legal professionals. Tis includes the ability to engage in depth with the new legal challenges arising from social change, and to analyse and apply the law to developing legal problems. Te Supreme Court’s participation in student seminars on a wide range of current legal issues is not only deeply exciting for our students, but ofers them an excellent opportunity to appreciate at frst hand the importance of rigorous legal analysis, and the balance between 3 necessary judicial creativity and maintaining the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Catholic Church in Ireland 1990-2010
    The Paschal Dimension of the 40 Days as an interpretive key to a reading of the new and serious challenges to faith in the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland 1990-2010 Kevin Doherty Doctor of Philosophy 2011 MATER DEI INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION A College of Dublin City University The Paschal Dimension of the 40 Days as an interpretive key to a reading of the new and serious challenges to faith in the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland 1990-2010 Kevin Doherty M.A. (Spirituality) Moderator: Dr Brendan Leahy, DD Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2011 DECLARATION I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Ph.D. is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. ID No: 53155831 Date: ' M l 2 - 0 1 DEDICATION To my parents Betty and Donal Doherty. The very first tellers of the Easter Story to me, and always the most faithful tellers of that Story. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thanks to all in the Diocese of Rockville Centre in New York who gave generously of their time and experience to facilitate this research: to Msgr Bob Brennan (Vicar General), Sr Mary Alice Piil (Director of Faith Formation), Marguerite Goglia (Associate Director, Children and Youth Formation), Lee Hlavecek, Carol Tannehill, Fr Jim Mannion, Msgr Bill Hanson. Also, to Fr Neil Carlin of the Columba Community in Donegal and Derry, a prophet of the contemporary Irish Church.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSES of the OIREACHTAS Volume 2 No
    HOUSES OF THE OIREACHTAS Volume 2 No. 3 Morning No. 4 Afternoon AN COMHCHOISTE FIOSRÚCHÁIN I DTAOBH NA GÉARCHÉIME BAINCÉI- REACHTA JOINT COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY INTO THE BANKING CRISIS Déardaoin, 23 Aibreán 2015 Thursday, 23 April 2015 The Committee met at 9.30 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Deputy Pearse Doherty, Senator Sean D. Barrett, Deputy Joe Higgins, Senator Michael D’Arcy, Deputy Michael McGrath, Senator Marc MacSharry, Deputy Eoghan Murphy, Senator Susan O’Keeffe. Deputy Kieran O’Donnell, Deputy John Paul Phelan, DEPUTY CIARÁN LYNCH IN THE CHAIR. 1 NEXUS PHASE Nexus Phase AIB - Mr. Dermot Gleeson Chairman: I now propose that, as we have a quorum, the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis will now go into public session. Is that agreed? Agreed. We commence this morning’s proceedings, session 1, public hearing, and a discussion with Mr. Dermot Gleeson, former chairman of Allied Irish Banks. In doing so, I would like to wel- come everyone to the 20th public hearing of the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis and this morning we will hear from Mr. Dermot Gleeson, former chairman of Allied Irish Banks. Mr. Gleeson was a leading barrister and senior counsel in Ireland in the 1980s and 1990s before he became a senior Government adviser and then a businessman. He served as At- torney General of Ireland in the Government of Taoiseach John Bruton. In 2003, Mr. Gleeson was appointed chairman of Allied Irish Banks. Mr. Gleeson, you are very welcome before the inquiry this morning. Mr. Dermot Gleeson: Thank you, Chairman.
    [Show full text]