DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Judicial Review Procedure (LRC 71 – 2004) Which Will Be Published in the Near Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on Judicial Review Procedure (LRC 71 – 2004) Which Will Be Published in the Near Future REPORT ON JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEDURE (LRC 71 - 2004) IRELAND The Law Reform Commission 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 © Copyright The Law Reform Commission 2004 First Published February 2004 ISSN 1393 - 3132 ii An Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, TD. Office of the Taoiseach Government Buildings Upper Merrion Street Dublin 2 12 February 2004 Dear Taoiseach I enclose a copy of the Commission’s Report on Judicial Review Procedure (LRC 71 – 2004) which will be published in the near future. Yours sincerely, _____________________ Declan Budd President iii iv THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION Background The Law Reform Commission is an independent statutory body whose main aim is to keep the law under review and to make practical proposals for its reform. It was established on 20 October 1975, pursuant to section 3 of the Law Reform Commission Act 1975. The Commission’s Second Programme for Law Reform, prepared in consultation with the Attorney General, was approved by the Government and copies were laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas in December 2000. The Commission also works on matters which are referred to it on occasion by the Attorney General under the terms of the Act. To date the Commission has published 69 Reports containing proposals for reform of the law; 11 Working Papers; 28 Consultation Papers; a number of specialised Papers for limited circulation; An Examination of the Law of Bail; and 24 Annual Reports in accordance with section 6 of the 1975 Act. A full list of its publications is contained in Appendix E to this Report. Membership The Law Reform Commission consists of a President, one full-time Commissioner and three part-time Commissioners. The Commissioners at present are: President The Hon Mr Justice Declan Budd High Court Commissioners Patricia T Rickard-Clarke Solicitor Dr Hilary A Delany, Barrister-at-Law Senior Lecturer in Law, Head of Law School, Trinity College Dublin v Professor Finbarr McAuley Jean Monnet Professor of European Criminal Justice, University College Dublin Marian Shanley Solicitor Secretary John Quirke Research Staff Director of Research Raymond Byrne BCL, LLM, Barrister-at-Law Legal Researchers Deirdre Ahern LLB, LLM (Cantab), Solicitor Simon Barr LLB (Hons), BSc Patricia Brazil LLB, Barrister-at-Law Ronan Flanagan LLB, LLM (Cantab) Glen Gibbons BA, LLB (NUI), LLM (Cantab) Claire Hamilton LLB (Ling Franc), MLitt, Barrister-at-Law Darren Lehane BCL, LLM (NUI) Trevor Redmond LLB, LLM (Cantab) Eadaoin Rock LLB, LLM (Cantab) Jennifer Schweppe BCL (Euro) Administration Staff Project Manager Pearse Rayel Legal Information Marina Greer BA, H Dip LIS Manager Cataloguer Eithne Boland BA (Hons) H Dip Ed, H Dip LIS vi Executive Officer Denis McKenna Private Secretary Liam Dargan to the President Clerical Officers Alan Bonny Debbie Murray Principal Legal Researcher on this Report Ronan Flanagan LLB, LLM (Cantab) Contact Details Further information can be obtained from: The Secretary The Law Reform Commission 35-39 Shelbourne Road Ballsbridge Dublin 4 Telephone (01) 637 7600 Fax No (01) 637 7601 Email [email protected] Website www.lawreform.ie vii viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Prior to the publication of the Consultation Paper on Judicial Review Procedure in 2003 the Commission established an expert working group to assist and advise it on the aspects of judicial review procedure to be addressed in the Paper. The Commission would like once again to thank the members of the Working Group for the expertise and experience they brought to this project. Members of the Working Group: Sean Barton, McCann FitzGerald Marcus Beresford, A&L Goodbody Conleth Bradley, Barrister-at-Law The Hon Mr Justice Declan Budd Nuala Butler SC David Clarke, McCann FitzGerald Commissioner Hilary Delany Sarah Farrell, Barrister-at-Law Finola Flanagan, Director General, Office of the Attorney General Paul Gallagher SC Professor David Gwynn Morgan Gerard Hogan SC The Hon Mr Justice Peter Kelly Claire Loftus, Chief Prosecution Solicitor Liz Mullan, Chief State Solicitor’s Office Kerida Naidoo, Barrister-at-Law Donal O’Donnell SC Commissioner Patricia T Rickard-Clarke Commissioner Marian Shanley Robert Sheehan, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Garrett Simons, Barrister-at-Law Marie Torrens, Barrister-at-Law Seamus Woulfe, Barrister-at-Law ix The Commission would particularly like to thank those who sent in written submissions on the Consultation Paper, namely Noeline Blackwell, Kevin Costello, Áine Ryall, Garrett Simons and Rory Williams. A word of thanks also goes to others who assisted the Commission during the writing of this Report, including all those who attended the seminar on judicial review procedure held at the Commission in July 2003, the Courts Service, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, the Repatriation Unit at the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform and the members of the judiciary who helped us with various queries. A particular debt of gratitude is owed to Professor David Gwynn Morgan whose insightful advice has, as always, proved invaluable. Full responsibility for this publication, however, lies with the Commission. x Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .....................................................................................IX INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 LEAVE STAGE ...........................................................................3 A Introduction........................................................................................................3 B Should the Leave Stage be Retained? ...............................................................4 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendation.......................................................4 (2) Arguments For and Against ......................................................................4 (3) Report Recommendation.........................................................................10 C What Level of Notice Should be Given at the Leave Stage? .........................10 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendation.....................................................10 (2) Arguments................................................................................................10 (3) Report Recommendation.........................................................................13 D What is the Appropriate Standard to be Applied at the Leave Stage? ...........14 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendation.....................................................14 (2) Arguments................................................................................................14 (3) Report Recommendation.........................................................................20 E Alternative Remedies ......................................................................................20 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendations ...................................................20 (2) The Present Position................................................................................21 (3) Report Recommendation.........................................................................22 F Amendments to the Grant of Leave ................................................................22 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendations ...................................................22 (2) The Present Position................................................................................23 (3) Report Recommendation.........................................................................25 G Applications to Set Aside an Order Granting Leave ......................................25 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendation.....................................................25 (2) The Present Position................................................................................25 (3) Report Recommendation.........................................................................28 H Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Leave .........................................................28 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendation.....................................................28 (2) Time Limits .............................................................................................28 (3) Obtaining Leave to Appeal......................................................................29 (4) Report Recommendation.........................................................................33 CHAPTER 2 TIME LIMITS............................................................................35 A Introduction......................................................................................................35 B Conventional Judicial Review.........................................................................35 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendation.....................................................35 (2) Extension of Time ...................................................................................36 (3) Prejudice ..................................................................................................38 (4) Report Recommendation.........................................................................43 C Statutory Judicial Review................................................................................43 (1) Consultation Paper Recommendation.....................................................43 (2) The Present Position................................................................................44 xi (3) Report Recommendation.........................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court Annual Report 2020
    2020Annual Report Report published by the Supreme Court of Ireland with the support of the Courts Service An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna Courts Service Editors: Sarahrose Murphy, Senior Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Patrick Conboy, Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Case summaries prepared by the following Judicial Assistants: Aislinn McCann Seán Beatty Iseult Browne Senan Crawford Orlaith Cross Katie Cundelan Shane Finn Matthew Hanrahan Cormac Hickey Caoimhe Hunter-Blair Ciara McCarthy Rachael O’Byrne Mary O’Rourke Karl O’Reilly © Supreme Court of Ireland 2020 2020 Annual Report Table of Contents Foreword by the Chief Justice 6 Introduction by the Registrar of the Supreme Court 9 2020 at a glance 11 Part 1 About the Supreme Court of Ireland 15 Branches of Government in Ireland 16 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 17 Structure of the Courts of Ireland 19 Timeline of key events in the Supreme Court’s history 20 Seat of the Supreme Court 22 The Supreme Court Courtroom 24 Journey of a typical appeal 26 Members of the Supreme Court 30 The Role of the Chief Justice 35 Retirement and Appointments 39 The Constitution of Ireland 41 Depositary for Acts of the Oireachtas 45 Part 2 The Supreme Court in 2020 46 COVID-19 and the response of the Court 47 Remote hearings 47 Practice Direction SC21 48 Application for Leave panels 48 Statement of Case 48 Clarification request 48 Electronic delivery of judgments 49 Sitting in King’s Inns 49 Statistics 50 Applications for Leave to Appeal 50 Categorisation of Applications for Leave to Appeal
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th LRC Report 04 D10365
    The Law Reform Commission AN COIMISIÚN UM ATHCHÓIRIÚ AN DLÍ Twenty-Fifth Report 2003 The Law Reform Commission 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland. Website: www.lawreform.ie Email: [email protected] Telephone: (01)6377600 Fax No: (01)6377601 © Copyright The Law Reform Commission 2004 First Published July 2004 ISSN 0332 - 0499 PN 3427 The Law Reform Commission Page 3 Contents Foreword ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Réamhrá __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 The Commission: Commissioners and Staff __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Chapter 1: Overview of the Commission’s work in 2003 Functions of the Commission __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Strategy and Business Plan _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Bar Review April 01 25.04
    The BarJournal of the Bar of IrelandReview .Volume 10 . Issue 5 . November 2005 • Can Ethics be Competitive • WhoWho’ll’ll bebe thethe JudgesJudges • The Division of Marital Assets in Ample Resource Cases The BarVolumeReview 10,Issue 5, November 2005, ISSN 1339 - 3426 Contents 142 Changes to the Code of Conduct Hugh Mohan SC 144 Can Ethics be Competitive? Editorial Correspondence to: Paul Gallagher SC Eilis Brennan BL, 151 Reflections on the Role of Law The Editor, Bar Review, Bishop Donal McKeown Law Library, Four Courts, 152 Continuing Professional Development. Dublin 7 Inga Ryan CPD Manager DX 813154 Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 153 You Be the Judge Fax: 353-1-872 0455 Jennifer Carroll e-mail: [email protected] Editor: Eilis Brennan BL 155 Legal Update: Editorial Board: A Guide to Legal Developments from Paul Gallagher SC (Chairman, Editorial Board) 15th July 2005 up to 7th October 2005. Gerry Durcan SC Mary O’Toole SC Patrick Dillon Malone BL 173 The Division of Marital Assets in "Ample Resource" Cases Conor Dignam BL Inge Clissmann SC and Paul Hutchinson BL Adele Murphy BL Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL Tom O’Malley BL Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere The Bar Review is published by Thomson Round Hall in association with The Bar Council of Ireland. Jeanne McDonagh For all subscription queries contact: Jerry Carroll Thomson Round Hall Consultant Editors 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Dermot Gleeson SC Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 Patrick MacEntee SC Email: [email protected] web: www.roundhall.ie Thomas McCann SC Subscriptions: January 2005 to December 2005 - 6 issues Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Annual Subscription: €188.00 Donal O’Donnell SC Annual Subscription + Bound Volume Service €288.00 Garrett Cooney SC Pat Hanratty SC For all advertising queries contact: Directories Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bar Review – July 2021 Edition
    THE BAR Volume 26 Number 4 REVIEWJournal of The Bar of Ireland July 2021 YOUNG BAR Article Competition 2021 To purchase a subscription, organise a free trial or request a remote demonstration, please email: [email protected] Bloomsbury Professional � bloomsburyprofessional.com ----Ireland----/"'< CONTENTS The Bar Review The Bar of Ireland Distillery Building 145-151 Church Street Dublin DO7 WDX8 Direct: +353 (0)1 817 5025 Fax: +353 (0)1 817 5150 Email: [email protected] Web: www.lawlibrary.ie 108 EDITORIAL BOARD Editor Eilis Brennan SC Brian Kennedy SC Paul McGarry SC Sara Moorhead SC Sean Ó hUallacháin SC Peggy O’Rourke SC Alex White SC Susan Ahern BL Patricia Brazil BL Lydia Bunni BL Simon Donagh BL 112 Elizabeth Donovan BL Anita Finucane BL Tom Flynn BL Alison Walker BL Ciara Murphy, CEO Vanessa Curley, Law Library Therese Barry, PR & Digital Events Officer Tom Cullen, Publisher Paul O'Grady, Publisher Ann-Marie Hardiman, Think Media 121 PUBLISHERS 127 Published on behalf of The Bar of Ireland by Think Media Ltd Message from the Chair 96 Editorial: Ann-Marie Hardiman LEGAL UPDATE xxiii Paul O’Grady Colm Quinn Editor’s note 97 Design: Tony Byrne Law in practice 117 Tom Cullen Ruth O’Sullivan Discovery and DSARs – trends, reform and motivations News 98 Advertising: Paul O’Grady Specialist Bar Association news YOUNG BAR ARTICLE COMPETITION 121 The right to life: death penalty and Malawi Commercial matters and news items relating WINNER: Norwich Pharmacal relief and the to The Bar Review should be addressed to: Paul O’Grady
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th LRC Report 04 D10365
    The Law Reform Commission AN COIMISIÚN UM ATHCHÓIRIÚ AN DLÍ Twenty-Fifth Report 2003 The Law Reform Commission 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland. Website: www.lawreform.ie Email: [email protected] Telephone: (01)6377600 Fax No: (01)6377601 © Copyright The Law Reform Commission 2004 First Published July 2004 ISSN 0332 - 0499 PN 3427 The Law Reform Commission Page 3 Contents Foreword ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Réamhrá __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 The Commission: Commissioners and Staff __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Chapter 1: Overview of the Commission’s work in 2003 Functions of the Commission __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Strategy and Business Plan _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • JAAB Annual Report 2020
    JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS ADVISORY BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Judicial Appointments Advisory Board Annual Report 2020 Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 : APPLICATIONS & APPOINTMENTS ........................................ 7 2.1 SUPREME COURT .................................................................................................... 8 2.2 COURT OF APPEAL ................................................................................................... 9 2.3 HIGH COURT .......................................................................................................... 9 2.4 CIRCUIT COURT..................................................................................................... 11 2.5 DISTRICT COURT ................................................................................................... 12 2.6 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 3 : STATISTICS ................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 4 : CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................... 17 CHAPTER 5 : APPENDICES ................................................................. 18 APPENDIX (I) ................................................................................................................ 18 Rules of the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board........................................................ 18 APPENDIX (II) ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Written Answers
    Questions - Written Answers Written Answers. The following are questions tabled by Members for written response and the ministerial replies as received on the day from the Departments [unrevised]. Questions Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, answered orally. 16/02/2017WRA00400Direct Provision System 16/02/2017WRA0050011. Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the changes which have been made or are planned to address the rights and needs of children who live in direct provision centres; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [7018/17] 16/02/2017WRA00600Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality (Deputy Frances Fitzgerald): As the Deputy will be aware, the Programme for Partnership Government states that “Long durations in direct provision are acknowledged to have a negative impact on family life. We are therefore committed to reforming the Direct Provision system, with particular focus on families and chil- dren.” I can therefore assure the House and the Deputy that the rights and needs of children are at the forefront of our thinking as this commitment is being delivered. The following are some of the highlights of the services and facilities available being made available to children and families across the accommodation portfolio:- - Tusla and the HSE, link in with accommodation centres to provide on-site services and monitoring of children and families through Public Health Nurse and GP services, social work teams, mental health specialists and through the positive engagement of accommodation centre management teams. - The Community Welfare Service of the Department of Social Protection holds clinics in many of our centres to assist families with needs which may fall to be assisted under the Ex- ceptional Needs Payments.
    [Show full text]