Written Answers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Written Answers Questions - Written Answers Written Answers. The following are questions tabled by Members for written response and the ministerial replies as received on the day from the Departments [unrevised]. Questions Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, answered orally. 16/02/2017WRA00400Direct Provision System 16/02/2017WRA0050011. Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the changes which have been made or are planned to address the rights and needs of children who live in direct provision centres; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [7018/17] 16/02/2017WRA00600Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality (Deputy Frances Fitzgerald): As the Deputy will be aware, the Programme for Partnership Government states that “Long durations in direct provision are acknowledged to have a negative impact on family life. We are therefore committed to reforming the Direct Provision system, with particular focus on families and chil- dren.” I can therefore assure the House and the Deputy that the rights and needs of children are at the forefront of our thinking as this commitment is being delivered. The following are some of the highlights of the services and facilities available being made available to children and families across the accommodation portfolio:- - Tusla and the HSE, link in with accommodation centres to provide on-site services and monitoring of children and families through Public Health Nurse and GP services, social work teams, mental health specialists and through the positive engagement of accommodation centre management teams. - The Community Welfare Service of the Department of Social Protection holds clinics in many of our centres to assist families with needs which may fall to be assisted under the Ex- ceptional Needs Payments. - The weekly allowance for children was increased by €6 to €15.10 per child in 2016 by the Department of Social Protection. - Children are linked in by local management to mainstream primary and post-primary schools in a like manner to the general population. Younger children may also avail of the free ECCE pre-school placements. - Homework clubs are also provided at certain family centres. The Department of Educa- tion has also made changes to allow children who are 5 years in the Direct Provision system and who have attended a minimum of five years in the Irish school system to avail of third level education. - RIA has a dedicated Child and Family Services Unit, whose role is to manage, deliver, 132 16 February 2017 coordinate, monitor and plan all matters relating to child and family services for all asylum seekers residing in the direct provision system. It also acts as a conduit between RIA and Tusla, the latter having statutory functions in this area. The Unit is headed up by an official seconded from Tusla who has clinical expertise in the area of child welfare and protection. - The Child Protection and Welfare Policy and Practice Document in force in all accom- modation centres is based on the HSE’s “Children First - National Guidelines for the protection and welfare of children. The HSE & Tusla have provided ‘Keeping Safe’ child protection train- ing and Designate Liaison Person Training [DLP] to each centre’s Designated Liaison Persons and other staff members. RIA has recently updated its Child Protection Policy to include a Practice Document. Briefing sessions were held in family centres around the country for centre staff members and all other relevant personnel. All staff of centres under contract to RIA are Garda vetted. Projects are underway in my Department to ensure that all facilities for families in accom- modation centres under contract to the Department are improved and enhanced to the highest possible standard. A number of recommendations in the the McMahon report in relation to physical improve- ments to accommodation are being rolled out. The following are just a few examples of the improvements either finished or in progress:- - The installation of residents’ kitchens in a number of accommodation centres to provide for home cooking by residents and their families; - The introduction of full independent living at the Mosney Accommodation centre - each family are able to select their own choice of fresh food so they may prepare meals for them- selves; - A complete refurbishment of each accommodation unit (triple glazed windows and doors, refurbished interiors) at the Athlone Accommodation Centre; - Improvements to a number of outdoor playgrounds and football pitches to provide for ‘all-weather’ facilities. - Teenage rooms in relevant centres to provide social areas for this age group. Many of the recommendations of the McMahon report that involve structural changes/im- provements are being implemented with necessary due consideration to fire safety, building regulation and planning issues. The Reception & Integration Agency (RIA), in consultation with its contractors, are examining the feasibility of phasing in the re-designation of accom- modation so that where possible each family has an independent living space. The House will appreciate that such structural changes cannot be put in place overnight and will take time but I am committed to implementing the improvements. Given the scope of the structural changes that have to be implemented, I am satisfied with the progress of such major improvements since the publication of the Agreed Programme for Partnership Government. Questions Nos. 12 and 13 answered orally. 16/02/2017WRA00800Policing Authority 16/02/2017WRA0090014. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if she 133 Questions - Written Answers will amend the Garda Síochána (Policing Authority and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2015 to further empower the Policing Authority in order to make the Garda Commissioner directly answerable to the authority; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [7672/17] 16/02/2017WRA01000Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality (Deputy Frances Fitzgerald): The es- tablishment of the new Policing Authority has been both a welcome and, I think, necessary addition to the policing landscape in the State. It has brought a dedicated layer of public ac- countability to the operation of policing services and it represents one of the most significant and progressive reforms to the justice sector over recent years. Indeed, the recent transfer of the appointment function in relation to the senior ranks is a particularly important signal of this reform. This House recently debated the Joint Committee on Justice and Equality’s Report on Garda Oversight and Accountability and I made the point during that debate that the recent changes related to policing need further time to fully embed themselves before we can fully assess the Authority’s effectiveness. That said, I strongly believe that the Authority has made a significant impact during its first year. Since its establishment, it has focused, as a matter of priority, on its functions which have statutory deadlines and reform significance. It has met on several occasions with the Commis- sioner and her senior team, as a follow up on its consideration of the O’Higgins Report and related matters. A number of these meetings have been held in public to reassure the com- munity about the performance of An Garda Síochána. Areas that have been highlighted in the discussions include: - implementation of the Modernisation and Renewal Programme within An Garda Sío- chána; - review of the Garda Protected Disclosure policy; - plans to conduct a culture audit within An Garda Síochána; - corporate governance arrangements and management structures within An Garda Sío- chána; and - arrangements for training and the professional development of members. The Authority has approved a three year Strategy for An Garda Síochána. It has also de- termined the policing priorities for 2017 which informed the content of the recently published 2017 Policing Plan. It has reviewed and issued recommendations on the Garda Protected Dis- closure policy and also recently launched a Code of Ethics which includes standards of conduct and practice for Garda members. In developing the legislative framework that now governs policing in the State, considerable thought was given to the Constitutional framework within which it would operate. In this re- gard, it is clearly the position that the public functions of An Garda Síochána relating to policing and security are important elements within the executive power of the State and must therefore be exercised, in accordance with Article 28.2 of the Constitution, by or on behalf of the Govern- ment. Accordingly, the provisions in the Act are designed to strike the right balance between, on the one hand, the exercise by the Policing Authority of effective and meaningful oversight of the Garda Síochána and, on the other hand, the retention by Government of essential residual powers in relation to policing. In my view, this new dispensation, although still in its early stages of development, is showing tangible results that bode well for its future. Having said that, I accept fully that we need to monitor how the new arrangements are 134 16 February 2017 working and, indeed, the legislation makes provision in this regard. The Authority is required, within 2 years of its establishment to submit to the Minister for Justice and Equality a report on the effectiveness of the Authority and the adequacy of the functions assigned to it. In addition, there is a requirement on the Minister for Justice and Equality, in consultation with the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, to review the operation of the statutory provisions relating to the Authority. That review must take place not later than 5 years after the establishment of the Authority. These provisions will ensure that the current Garda oversight arrangements can be kept under review in an orderly and sensible fashion. They will also provide an appropriate mecha- nism whereby any amendments considered necessary to the functions of the Authority can be identified.
Recommended publications
  • Report on Judicial Review Procedure (LRC 71 – 2004) Which Will Be Published in the Near Future
    REPORT ON JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEDURE (LRC 71 - 2004) IRELAND The Law Reform Commission 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 © Copyright The Law Reform Commission 2004 First Published February 2004 ISSN 1393 - 3132 ii An Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, TD. Office of the Taoiseach Government Buildings Upper Merrion Street Dublin 2 12 February 2004 Dear Taoiseach I enclose a copy of the Commission’s Report on Judicial Review Procedure (LRC 71 – 2004) which will be published in the near future. Yours sincerely, _____________________ Declan Budd President iii iv THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION Background The Law Reform Commission is an independent statutory body whose main aim is to keep the law under review and to make practical proposals for its reform. It was established on 20 October 1975, pursuant to section 3 of the Law Reform Commission Act 1975. The Commission’s Second Programme for Law Reform, prepared in consultation with the Attorney General, was approved by the Government and copies were laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas in December 2000. The Commission also works on matters which are referred to it on occasion by the Attorney General under the terms of the Act. To date the Commission has published 69 Reports containing proposals for reform of the law; 11 Working Papers; 28 Consultation Papers; a number of specialised Papers for limited circulation; An Examination of the Law of Bail; and 24 Annual Reports in accordance with section 6 of the 1975 Act. A full list of its publications is contained in Appendix E to this Report. Membership The Law Reform Commission consists of a President, one full-time Commissioner and three part-time Commissioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Annual Report 2020
    2020Annual Report Report published by the Supreme Court of Ireland with the support of the Courts Service An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna Courts Service Editors: Sarahrose Murphy, Senior Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Patrick Conboy, Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Case summaries prepared by the following Judicial Assistants: Aislinn McCann Seán Beatty Iseult Browne Senan Crawford Orlaith Cross Katie Cundelan Shane Finn Matthew Hanrahan Cormac Hickey Caoimhe Hunter-Blair Ciara McCarthy Rachael O’Byrne Mary O’Rourke Karl O’Reilly © Supreme Court of Ireland 2020 2020 Annual Report Table of Contents Foreword by the Chief Justice 6 Introduction by the Registrar of the Supreme Court 9 2020 at a glance 11 Part 1 About the Supreme Court of Ireland 15 Branches of Government in Ireland 16 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 17 Structure of the Courts of Ireland 19 Timeline of key events in the Supreme Court’s history 20 Seat of the Supreme Court 22 The Supreme Court Courtroom 24 Journey of a typical appeal 26 Members of the Supreme Court 30 The Role of the Chief Justice 35 Retirement and Appointments 39 The Constitution of Ireland 41 Depositary for Acts of the Oireachtas 45 Part 2 The Supreme Court in 2020 46 COVID-19 and the response of the Court 47 Remote hearings 47 Practice Direction SC21 48 Application for Leave panels 48 Statement of Case 48 Clarification request 48 Electronic delivery of judgments 49 Sitting in King’s Inns 49 Statistics 50 Applications for Leave to Appeal 50 Categorisation of Applications for Leave to Appeal
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th LRC Report 04 D10365
    The Law Reform Commission AN COIMISIÚN UM ATHCHÓIRIÚ AN DLÍ Twenty-Fifth Report 2003 The Law Reform Commission 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland. Website: www.lawreform.ie Email: [email protected] Telephone: (01)6377600 Fax No: (01)6377601 © Copyright The Law Reform Commission 2004 First Published July 2004 ISSN 0332 - 0499 PN 3427 The Law Reform Commission Page 3 Contents Foreword ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Réamhrá __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 The Commission: Commissioners and Staff __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Chapter 1: Overview of the Commission’s work in 2003 Functions of the Commission __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Strategy and Business Plan _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Bar Review April 01 25.04
    The BarJournal of the Bar of IrelandReview .Volume 10 . Issue 5 . November 2005 • Can Ethics be Competitive • WhoWho’ll’ll bebe thethe JudgesJudges • The Division of Marital Assets in Ample Resource Cases The BarVolumeReview 10,Issue 5, November 2005, ISSN 1339 - 3426 Contents 142 Changes to the Code of Conduct Hugh Mohan SC 144 Can Ethics be Competitive? Editorial Correspondence to: Paul Gallagher SC Eilis Brennan BL, 151 Reflections on the Role of Law The Editor, Bar Review, Bishop Donal McKeown Law Library, Four Courts, 152 Continuing Professional Development. Dublin 7 Inga Ryan CPD Manager DX 813154 Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 153 You Be the Judge Fax: 353-1-872 0455 Jennifer Carroll e-mail: [email protected] Editor: Eilis Brennan BL 155 Legal Update: Editorial Board: A Guide to Legal Developments from Paul Gallagher SC (Chairman, Editorial Board) 15th July 2005 up to 7th October 2005. Gerry Durcan SC Mary O’Toole SC Patrick Dillon Malone BL 173 The Division of Marital Assets in "Ample Resource" Cases Conor Dignam BL Inge Clissmann SC and Paul Hutchinson BL Adele Murphy BL Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL Tom O’Malley BL Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere The Bar Review is published by Thomson Round Hall in association with The Bar Council of Ireland. Jeanne McDonagh For all subscription queries contact: Jerry Carroll Thomson Round Hall Consultant Editors 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Dermot Gleeson SC Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 Patrick MacEntee SC Email: [email protected] web: www.roundhall.ie Thomas McCann SC Subscriptions: January 2005 to December 2005 - 6 issues Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Annual Subscription: €188.00 Donal O’Donnell SC Annual Subscription + Bound Volume Service €288.00 Garrett Cooney SC Pat Hanratty SC For all advertising queries contact: Directories Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bar Review – July 2021 Edition
    THE BAR Volume 26 Number 4 REVIEWJournal of The Bar of Ireland July 2021 YOUNG BAR Article Competition 2021 To purchase a subscription, organise a free trial or request a remote demonstration, please email: [email protected] Bloomsbury Professional � bloomsburyprofessional.com ----Ireland----/"'< CONTENTS The Bar Review The Bar of Ireland Distillery Building 145-151 Church Street Dublin DO7 WDX8 Direct: +353 (0)1 817 5025 Fax: +353 (0)1 817 5150 Email: [email protected] Web: www.lawlibrary.ie 108 EDITORIAL BOARD Editor Eilis Brennan SC Brian Kennedy SC Paul McGarry SC Sara Moorhead SC Sean Ó hUallacháin SC Peggy O’Rourke SC Alex White SC Susan Ahern BL Patricia Brazil BL Lydia Bunni BL Simon Donagh BL 112 Elizabeth Donovan BL Anita Finucane BL Tom Flynn BL Alison Walker BL Ciara Murphy, CEO Vanessa Curley, Law Library Therese Barry, PR & Digital Events Officer Tom Cullen, Publisher Paul O'Grady, Publisher Ann-Marie Hardiman, Think Media 121 PUBLISHERS 127 Published on behalf of The Bar of Ireland by Think Media Ltd Message from the Chair 96 Editorial: Ann-Marie Hardiman LEGAL UPDATE xxiii Paul O’Grady Colm Quinn Editor’s note 97 Design: Tony Byrne Law in practice 117 Tom Cullen Ruth O’Sullivan Discovery and DSARs – trends, reform and motivations News 98 Advertising: Paul O’Grady Specialist Bar Association news YOUNG BAR ARTICLE COMPETITION 121 The right to life: death penalty and Malawi Commercial matters and news items relating WINNER: Norwich Pharmacal relief and the to The Bar Review should be addressed to: Paul O’Grady
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th LRC Report 04 D10365
    The Law Reform Commission AN COIMISIÚN UM ATHCHÓIRIÚ AN DLÍ Twenty-Fifth Report 2003 The Law Reform Commission 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland. Website: www.lawreform.ie Email: [email protected] Telephone: (01)6377600 Fax No: (01)6377601 © Copyright The Law Reform Commission 2004 First Published July 2004 ISSN 0332 - 0499 PN 3427 The Law Reform Commission Page 3 Contents Foreword ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Réamhrá __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 The Commission: Commissioners and Staff __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Chapter 1: Overview of the Commission’s work in 2003 Functions of the Commission __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Strategy and Business Plan _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • JAAB Annual Report 2020
    JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS ADVISORY BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Judicial Appointments Advisory Board Annual Report 2020 Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 : APPLICATIONS & APPOINTMENTS ........................................ 7 2.1 SUPREME COURT .................................................................................................... 8 2.2 COURT OF APPEAL ................................................................................................... 9 2.3 HIGH COURT .......................................................................................................... 9 2.4 CIRCUIT COURT..................................................................................................... 11 2.5 DISTRICT COURT ................................................................................................... 12 2.6 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 3 : STATISTICS ................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 4 : CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................... 17 CHAPTER 5 : APPENDICES ................................................................. 18 APPENDIX (I) ................................................................................................................ 18 Rules of the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board........................................................ 18 APPENDIX (II) ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]