DOCSLIB.ORG

Name of Deliverable

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Name of Deliverable Groundwater surface water interaction in GDE Deliverable D4.2 Partner: University of Oulu B. Kløve, P. Ala-aho, G. Bertrand, A. Erturk, A. Gemitzi, E. Gönec A. Moszczynska, M. Mileusnic H. Kupfersberger, J. Kværner, , A. Lundberg, S. Peña Haro, P. Rossi, D. Siergieiev, P. Wachniew, A. Wolak Deliverable summary Project title Acronym Contract GENESIS 226536 number Date due Month 28 in GENESIS Final version submitted to EC Month 32 in GENESIS Complete references Groundwater surface water interaction in GDE: GENSIS project deliverable 4.2 Contact person Björn Klöve Contact information [email protected] Authors and their affiliation University of Oulu (UOULU) Project homepage www.thegenesisproject.eu Confidentiality Key words Groundwater, ecosystems, hydrology, groundwater-surface-water interaction, conceptual and numerical models. Summary (publishable) for This report reviews and discussed the interaction of groundwater policy uptake in GDEs. The report presents and integrates past and new results. Different methods used to measure groundwater interaction with ecosystems are presented. Various GENESIS case studies across Europe to demonstrate the variable and complex role of groundwater in GDEs. The basis for developing conceptual for GDEs is presented. Various methods to model GDEs are discussed. List of GENESIS partners Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Bioforsk Norway Research (CO) University of Oulu UOULU Finland Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH JR Austria Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich ETH Switzerland Luleå University of Technology LUT Sweden University of Bucharest UB Romania GIS-Geoindustry, s.r.o. GIS Czech Republic French National institute for Agricultural research INRA France Alterra - Wageningen University and Research Centre Alterra The Netherlands Helmholtz München Gesundheit Umwelt HMGU Germany Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology EAWAG Switzerland University of Science and Technology AGH Poland Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore UCSC Italy Integrated Global Ecosystem Management Research and IGEM Turkey Consulting Co. Technical University of Valencia UPVLC Spain Democritus University of Thrace DUTh Greece Cracow University of Technology CUT Poland University of Neuchâtel UNINE Switzerland Athens University of Economics and Business- Research Centre AUEB-RC Greece University of Dundee UNIVDUN United Kingdom University of Zagreb - Faculty of Mining, Geology and UNIZG-RGNF Croatia Petroleum Engineering Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ Germany Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute SMHI Sweden University of Bologna UBOLOGNA Italy University of Kiel UKIEL Germany Table of contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Groundwater in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems ..................................................................... 7 1.2 Water Framework and Groundwater Directive ............................................................................ 9 1.3 Presentation of GENESIS studies ................................................................................................... 9 2. Measurement approaches to detect groundwater in GDE ............................................................... 12 2.1 Hydrogeological measurements in GDEs .................................................................................... 12 2.2 Temperature and EC as indicators of groundwater .................................................................... 14 2.3 Geochemistry as indicator of groundwater ................................................................................ 16 2.4 Isotopes as indicators of groundwater ........................................................................................ 18 2.5 Tracer tests .................................................................................................................................. 21 2.6 Mapping of recharge and discharge points ................................................................................. 22 3. Results from GENESIS main GDE study sites ..................................................................................... 23 3.1 Esker aquifer lake interaction, Rokua Finland ............................................................................. 23 3.1.1 Hydrogeology, site description and methods ...................................................................... 23 3.1.2 Major outcome from the study ............................................................................................ 25 3.1.3 Conceptual models for surface water – groundwater interaction ....................................... 26 3.2 Lule river hyporheic zone interaction, Sweden ........................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Hydrogeology, site description and methods ...................................................................... 29 3.2.2 Major outcome from the study ............................................................................................ 33 3.3 Riperian zone interaction, Switzerland ....................................................................................... 34 3.3.1 Hydrogeology, site description and methods ...................................................................... 34 3.3.2 Major outcome from the study ............................................................................................ 35 3.3.3 Conceptual models for surface water – groundwater interaction ....................................... 36 3.4 Dalyan Mediterranean Lagoon, Turkey ....................................................................................... 42 3.4.1 Site Description and Hydrology ............................................................................................ 42 3.4.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 45 3.4.3 Major outcome from the study ............................................................................................ 50 3.4.4 Conceptual models for surface water – groundwater interaction ....................................... 51 3.5 River lake lagoon interaction, Greece ......................................................................................... 53 3.5.1 Hydrogeology, site description and methods ...................................................................... 53 3.5.2 Major outcome from the study ............................................................................................ 54 3.5.3 Conceptual models for surface water – groundwater interaction ....................................... 55 3.6 Bogucice Sands - Niepolomice Forest, Poland ............................................................................ 59 3.6.1. Site description, hydrogeology and water use .................................................................... 59 3.7 Częstochowa aquifer interaction, Poland ................................................................................... 64 3.7.1 Hydrogeology, site description and methods ...................................................................... 64 3.7.2 Major outcome from the study ............................................................................................ 67 3.7.3 Conceptual models for surface water – groundwater interaction ....................................... 69 3.8 The Grue site, Norway (Bioforsk) ................................................................................................ 71 3.8.1 Site description, hydrogeolgy and methods ........................................................................ 71 3.8.2 Major outcome from the study ............................................................................................ 71 3.8.3 Conceptual models for surface water – groundwater interaction ....................................... 74 3.9 Sava river, interaction with groundwater ................................................................................... 75 3.9.1 Hydrodynamic pattern of the Sava River – groundwater interaction .................................. 76 3.9.2 Hydrogeochemical evidence of the Sava River –groundwater interaction .......................... 79 3.10 Fontanili springs, Italy, Hydrogeology, site description and methods ...................................... 80 3.10.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 80 3.10.2 Groundwater – Surface Water interactions: Fontanili of the Lombardy Region ............... 86 3.10.3 Major outcome from studies on selected fontanili ............................................................ 90 3.10.4 Conceptual model for surface water – groundwater interaction ...................................... 91 4. Modelling of surface-groundwater interaction in aquifers ............................................................... 92 4.1 Groundwater interaction with ecosystems ................................................................................. 92 4.2 Conceptual models ...................................................................................................................... 93 4.3 Numerical modelling needs and approaches .............................................................................. 94 4.3.1 Numerical modelling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The New Guide Book Introduces the Special Features of the Rokua Geopark´S Landscape
    The new guide book introduces the special features of the Rokua Geopark´s landscape Rokua UNESCO Global Geopark tells the story of the Rokua esker from the pre-glacial stages of bedrock development to the formation of the esker and the subsequent development of biota and the spread of human settlement in the area. In geological events, the time scale is challenging - it can be anything from a fraction of a second to billions of years. In particular, billions of years of time scales are difficult to comprehend. Various means of illustration are needed to support this. This work has recently been done in Rokua Geopark to make the story of the landscape easier understandable. The landscape of Rokua Geopark is like a big puzzle, built from landforms created by different eras and different forces of nature. Although Rokua Geopark tells the story of an esker (soil formation), the early stages of bedrock development are also important for the present landscape. The oldest rocks in the area, with detached pieces also found in eskers, are about 2.9 billion years old! The spread of plants and animals to the area after the ice age and the history of human settlement are closely linked to geological formations and events. The landscape is ultimately the sum of the interactions of all its pieces. We illustrate these things in a new guide booklet, published in December 2020, which we started working on as early as 2018. The aim was to create a booklet that presents the story of the landscape in an easy-to- understand way, allowing you to get to know the area before you arrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Karst Features — Where and What Are They?
    Karst Features — Where and What are They? This story was made with Esri's Story Map Journal. Read the interactive version on the web at https://arcg.is/jCmza. Iowa Geological and Water Survey Bureau completed a detailed mapping project of bedrock geologic units, key subsurface horizons, and surficial karst features in the Iowa portion of the Upper Iowa River Watershed in 2011. In the report, they note that “One of the primary goals of the study was to gain more thorough understanding of relationships between bedrock geology and karst features within the watershed.” Black River Falls photo courtesy of Larry Reis. Sinkholes Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, USGS, NGA, EPA, NPS According to the GIS data from the Iowa DNR, the UIR Watershed has 6,649 known sinkholes in the Iowa portion of the watershed. Although this number is very precise, sinkhole development is actually an active process in the UIR Watershed so the actual number of sinkholes changes over time as some are filled in through natural or human processes and others are formed. One of the most numerous karst features found in the UIR Watershed, sinkholes are formed when specific types of underlying bedrock are gradually dissolved, creating voids in the subsurface. When soils and other materials above these voids can no longer bridge the gap created in the bedrock, a collapse occurs. Photo Courtesy of USGS Sinkholes vary in size and shape and can and do occur in any type of land use in the UIR Watershed, from row crop to forest, and even in roads. According to the Iowa Geologic Survey, sinkholes are often connected to underground bedrock fractures and conduits, from minor fissures to enlarged caverns, which allow for rapid movement of water from sinkholes vertically and laterally through the subsurface.
    [Show full text]
  • “I Care for Počitelj”
    “I care for Počitelj” - “I care for Stolac” 07 – 15 July 2016 This unique medieval settlement, on the list to be declared a cultural heritage by UNESCO, is situated in the valley of the Neretva River, twenty five kilometers from Mostar, on the way to the Adriatic Sea. In the 1960s, Počitelj began to grow as an art center, promoted also by the famous writer - Nobel Prize winner Ivo Andrić. Počitelj, with its jumble of medieval stone buildings, ancient tower overlooking the river and proximity to the seaside, giving artists and will give you the peaceful and scenic place to work and stay. In the year 2000, the Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina initiated the Programme of the permanent protection of Počitelj. This includes protection of cultural heritage from deterioration, reconstruction of damaged and destroyed buildings, encouraging the return of the refugees and displaced persons to their homes as well as long-term preservation and revitalization of Počitelj historic urban area. The Programm is on-going. But a lot of maintenance services in public spaces and along the stone paths of the old town require voluntary action of few inhabitants. photo: Alberto Sartori Structure and Activities of the Camp Planned activities are: 1. “Active citizenship” actions: working activities in Počitelj and Stolac 2. Other events: public conference – sightseeing of surroundings 1. Active citizenship actions - working activities - Cleaning the environment around the old tower (citadel) and public areas in the old town of Počitelj, pruning
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Introduction and Demonstration
    Ground Water Introduction and Demonstration Page Content By Kimberly Mullen, CPG http://www.ngwa.org/Fundamentals/teachers/Pages/Ground-Water-Introduction-and- Demonstration.aspx Objective Students will be able to define terms pertaining to groundwater such as permeability, porosity, unconfined aquifer, confined aquifer, drawdown, cone of depression, recharge rate, Darcy’s law, and artesian well. Students will be able to illustrate environmental problems facing groundwater, (such as chemical contamination, point source and nonpoint source contamination, sediment control, and overuse). Introduction Looking at satellite photographs of the planet Earth can illustrate the fact that the majority of the Earth’s surface is covered with water. Earth is known as the “Blue Planet.” Seventy-one percent of the Earth’s surface is covered with water. There also is water beneath the surface of the Earth. Yet, with all of the water present on Earth, water is still a finite source, cycling from one form to another. This cycle, known as the hydrologic cycle, is an important concept to help understand the water found on Earth. In addition to understanding the hydrologic cycle, you must understand the different places that water can be found—primarily above the ground (as surface water) and below the ground (as groundwater). Today, we will be starting to understand water below the ground. General definitions and discussion points “What is groundwater?” Groundwater is defined as water that is found beneath the water table under Earth’s surface. “Why is groundwater important?” Groundwater, makes up about 98 percent of all the usable fresh water on the planet, and it is about 60 times as plentiful as fresh water found in lakes and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decision Analysis Framework for Stakeholder Involvement and Learning in Groundwater Management
    Open Access Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5141–5153, 2013 Hydrology and www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/5141/2013/ doi:10.5194/hess-17-5141-2013 Earth System © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences A decision analysis framework for stakeholder involvement and learning in groundwater management T. P. Karjalainen1, P. M. Rossi2, P. Ala-aho2, R. Eskelinen2, K. Reinikainen3, B. Kløve2, M. Pulido-Velazquez4, and H. Yang5,6 1Thule Institute, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 7300, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland 2University of Oulu, Department of Process and Environmental Engineering, Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Laboratory, P.O. Box 4300, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland 3Pöyry Finland Oy, Tutkijantie 2A–D, 90590 Oulu, Finland 4Research Institute of Water and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain 5Department of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modeling, Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology, Ueberlandstrasse, 133, 8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland 6Department of Environmental Science, University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland Correspondence to: T. P. Karjalainen (timo.p.karjalainen@oulu.fi), P. M. Rossi (pekka.rossi@oulu.fi), P. Ala-aho (pertti.ala-aho@oulu.fi), R. Eskelinen ([email protected].fi), K. Reinikainen ([email protected]), B. Kløve (bjorn.klove@oulu.fi), M. Pulido-Velazquez ([email protected]), and H. Yang ([email protected]) Received: 20 June 2013 – Published in Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 5 July 2013 Revised: 15 November 2013 – Accepted: 20 November 2013 – Published: 18 December 2013 Abstract. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods interests are represented.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of Harrison County, Indiana
    HYDROGEOLOGY OF HARRISON COUNTY, INDIANA BULLETIN 40 STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER 2006 HYDROGEOLOGY OF HARRISON COUNTY, INDIANA By Gerald A. Unterreiner STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER Bulletin 40 Printed by Authority of the State of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana: 2006 CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose and Background ........................................................................................................... 1 Climate....................................................................................................................................... 1 Physiography.............................................................................................................................. 4 Bedrock Geology ....................................................................................................................... 5 Bedrock Topography ................................................................................................................. 8 Surficial Geology....................................................................................................................... 8 Karst Hydrology and Springs..................................................................................................... 11 Hydrogeology and Ground Water Availability.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SCHRIFTENREIHE DER DEUTSCHEN GESELLSCHAFT FÜR GEOWISSENSCHAFTEN GEOTOPE – DIALOG ZWISCHEN STADT UND LAND ISBN 978-3-932537-49-3 Heft 51 S
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt in Wien Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 60 Autor(en)/Author(s): Nevaleinen Raimo, Nenonen Jari Artikel/Article: World Natural Heritage and Geopark Sites and Possible Candidates in Finland 135-139 ©Geol. Bundesanstalt, Wien; download unter www.geologie.ac.at ABHANDLUNGEN DER GEOLOGISCHEN BUNDESANSTALT Abh. Geol. B.-A. ISSN 0378-0864 ISBN 978-3-85316-036-7 Band 60 S. 135–139 Wien, 11.–16. Juni 2007 SCHRIFTENREIHE DER DEUTSCHEN GESELLSCHAFT FÜR GEOWISSENSCHAFTEN GEOTOPE – DIALOG ZWISCHEN STADT UND LAND ISBN 978-3-932537-49-3 Heft 51 S. 135–139 Wien, 11.–16. Juni 2007 11. Internationale Jahrestagung der Fachsektion GeoTop der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften Word Natural Heritage and Geopark Sites and Possible Candidates in Finland RAIMO NEVALAINEN & JARI NENONEN*) 8 Text-Figures Finnland Pleistozän Inlandeis UNESCO-Weltnaturerbe Österreichische Karte 1 : 50.000 Geopark Blätter 40, 41, 58, 59 Geotourismus Contents 1. Zusammenfassung . 135 1. Abstractt . 135 1. Saimaa-Pielinen Lakeland District . 136 2. Rokua – a Geological Puzzle . 136 3. Pyhä-Luosto National Park . 137 4. Kvarken . 138 2. References . 139 Weltnaturerbe und Geoparks und mögliche Kandidaten in Finnland Zusammenfassung Zurzeit gilt Tourismus als weltweit am schnellsten wachsender Wirtschaftszweig. In Finnland sind Geologie und geologische Sehenswürdigkeiten als Touristenziele sowie als Informationsquellen relativ neu und daher selten. Das Geologische Forschungszentrum von Finnland (GTK) arbeitet bereits seit etlichen Jahren daran, der Bevölkerung, der Tourismusbranche und Bildungsanstalten Wissen über das geologische Erbe zur Verfügung zu stellen. Eine wichtige Aufgabe ist ebenfalls gewesen, das geologische Wissen in der Grundschulausbildung zu erhöhen.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Applicability of the Heat Pulse Method Toward the Determination of Infiltration Rates in Karst Losing-Stream Reaches
    T. Dogwiler, C.M. Wicks, and E. Jenzen – An assessment of the applicability of the heat pulse method toward the determination of infiltration rates in karst losing-stream reaches. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 69, no. 2, p. 237–242. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE HEAT PULSE METHOD TOWARD THE DETERMINATION OF INFILTRATION RATES IN KARST LOSING-STREAM REACHES TOBY DOGWILER1,CAROL M. WICKS2, AND ETHAN JENZEN3 Abstract: Quantifying the rate at which water infiltrates through sediment-choked losing stream reaches into underlying karstic systems is problematic, yet critically important. Using the one-dimensional heat pulse method, we determined the rate at which water infiltrated vertically downward through an estimated 600 m by 2 m sediment-choked losing-stream reach in the Devil’s Icebox Karst System of Central Missouri. The 25 26 21 infiltration rate ranged from 4.9 3 10 to 1.9 3 10 ms , and the calculated discharge 22 23 3 21 through the reach ranged from 5.8 3 10 to 2.3 3 10 m s . The heat pulse-derived discharges for the losing reach bracketed the median discharge measured at the outlet to the karst system. Our accuracy was in part affected by significant precipitation in the karst basin during the study period that contributed flow to the outlet from recharge areas other than the investigated losing reach. Additionally, the results could be improved by future studies that deal with identifying areas of infiltration in losing reaches and how that area varies in relation to changing flow conditions. However, the heat pulse method appears useful in providing reasonable estimates of the rate of infiltration and discharge of water through sediment-choked losing reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling of Solute Transport and Retention in Upper Amite River Hoonshin Jung Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 Modeling of solute transport and retention in Upper Amite River Hoonshin Jung Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Jung, Hoonshin, "Modeling of solute transport and retention in Upper Amite River" (2008). LSU Master's Theses. 2006. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2006 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MODELING OF SOLUTE TRANSPORT AND RETENTION IN UPPER AMITE RIVER A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering in The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering by Hoonshin Jung B.S., Inha University, 1996 M.S., Inha University, 1998 December, 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to express my deepest appreciation to Dr. Zhi-Qiang Deng, who is my graduate advisor and the chair on my committee. Dr. Deng has continuously supported and encouraged me throughout my graduate program. Most significantly, Dr. Deng has provided tremendous help upon development and completion of this master thesis. Again, his extensive help, support, and advice are highly recognized and appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS in ESKER AQUIFERS from Field Measurements to Fully Integrated Numerical Modelling
    C510etukansi.kesken.fm Page 1 Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:11 PM C 510 OULU 2014 C 510 UNIVERSITY OF OULU P.O.BR[ 00 FI-90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND ACTA UNIVERSITATISUNIVERSITATIS OULUENSISOULUENSIS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS ACTAACTA SERIES EDITORS TECHNICATECHNICACC Pertti Ala-aho ASCIENTIAE RERUM NATURALIUM Pertti Ala-aho Professor Esa Hohtola GROUNDWATER-SURFACE BHUMANIORA WATER INTERACTIONS IN University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen CTECHNICA ESKER AQUIFERS Postdoctoral research fellow Sanna Taskila FROM FIELD MEASUREMENTS TO FULLY DMEDICA INTEGRATED NUMERICAL MODELLING Professor Olli Vuolteenaho ESCIENTIAE RERUM SOCIALIUM University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen FSCRIPTA ACADEMICA Director Sinikka Eskelinen GOECONOMICA Professor Jari Juga EDITOR IN CHIEF Professor Olli Vuolteenaho PUBLICATIONS EDITOR Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL; UNIVERSITY OF OULU, FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY ISBN 978-952-62-0657-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-0658-5 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3213 (Print) ISSN 1796-2226 (Online) ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS C Technica 510 PERTTI ALA-AHO GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS IN ESKER AQUIFERS From field measurements to fully integrated numerical modelling Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Doctoral Training Committee of Technology and Natural Sciences of the University of Oulu for public defence in Auditorium GO101, Linnanmaa, on 9 December 2014, at 12 noon UNIVERSITY OF OULU, OULU 2014 Copyright © 2014 Acta Univ. Oul. C 510, 2014 Supervised by Professor Bjørn Kløve Reviewed by Professor Peter Engesgaard Doctor Jon Paul Jones Opponent Professor Philip Brunner ISBN 978-952-62-0657-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-0658-5 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3213 (Printed) ISSN 1796-2226 (Online) Cover Design Raimo Ahonen JUVENES PRINT TAMPERE 2014 Ala-aho, Pertti, Groundwater-surface water interactions in esker aquifers.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology
    Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology By Charles J. Taylor and Earl A. Greene Chapter 3 of Field Techniques for Estimating Water Fluxes Between Surface Water and Ground Water Edited by Donald O. Rosenberry and James W. LaBaugh Techniques and Methods 4–D2 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................................75 Hydrogeologic Characteristics of Karst ..........................................................................................77 Conduits and Springs .........................................................................................................................77 Karst Recharge....................................................................................................................................80 Karst Drainage Basins .......................................................................................................................81 Hydrogeologic Characterization ...............................................................................................................82 Area of the Karst Drainage Basin ....................................................................................................82 Allogenic Recharge and Conduit Carrying Capacity ....................................................................83 Matrix and Fracture System Hydraulic Conductivity ....................................................................83
    [Show full text]
  • Backpacking: Bird Knob
    1 © 1999 Troy R. Hayes. All rights reserved. Preface As a new Scoutmaster, I wanted to take my troop on different kinds of adventure. But each trip took a tremendous amount of preparation to discover what the possibilities were, to investigate them, to pick one, and finally make the detailed arrangements. In some cases I even made a reconnaissance trip in advance in order to make sure the trip worked. The Pathfinder is an attempt to make this process easier. A vigorous outdoor program is a key element in Boy Scouting. The trips described in these pages range from those achievable by eleven year olds to those intended for fourteen and up (high adventure). And remember what the Irish say: The weather determines not whether you go, but what clothing you should wear. My Scouts have camped in ice, snow, rain, and heat. The most memorable trips were the ones with "bad" weather. That's when character building best occurs. Troy Hayes Warrenton, VA [Preface revised 3-10-2011] 2 Contents Backpacking Bird Knob................................................................... 5 Bull Run - Occoquan Trail.......................................... 7 Corbin/Nicholson Hollow............................................ 9 Dolly Sods (2 day trip)............................................... 11 Dolly Sods (3 day trip)............................................... 13 Otter Creek Wilderness............................................. 15 Saint Mary's Trail ................................................ ..... 17 Sherando Lake .......................................................
    [Show full text]