DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution of Pillar 2 Approach Increased Harmonisation and Formalisation of Additional Capital Requirements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Evolution of Pillar 2 approach Increased harmonisation and formalisation of additional capital requirements 2001 2016 “The supervisory authority may choose to work with the bank “[…] the proposal […] distinguishes between Pillar 2 capital in determining the appropriate levels of capital. A trigger ratio requirements and guidance: can be set, which is deemed to be the minimum required by • The former are mandatory requirements that are imposed the bank based on its risk profile. In addition, a target ratio by supervisors to address risks not covered or not may be established that would provide a warning that the bank sufficiently covered by Pillar 1 and buffer capital is operating too close to the trigger ratio. The trigger ratio requirements; should be reviewed periodically to ensure that it continues to • Capital guidance refers instead to the possibility for reflect the bank's risk profile. In the event a bank has no competent authorities to communicate to an institution their unusual risk characteristics, there should be a presumption expectations for such institution to hold capital in excess of that the adequate trigger ratio is the minimum ratio required Pillar 1 capital requirement, Pillar 2 capital requirements under Pillar 1.” and combined buffers requirements in order to cope with forward looking and remote situations.” Source: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: Consultative Document, Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Source: European Commission FAQ CRR/CRD IV and BRRD/SRM amendments, November 2016 Process), January 2001 1 Recap – current SREP framework Split into requirement and guidance further formalises Pillar 2 add-on SREP 20163 CET1 phase-in impact 1% to 6.8%² P2G MDA restriction trigger point P2G G-SIB 0.25% to 3%¹ P2G D-SII Buffer SRB Buffer Countercyclical Capital Up to 2.5%¹ Buffer Capital Conservation Conservation Buffer Buffer Capital Conservation 2.5%¹ Buffer P2R P2R OCR P2R 1.5% to 3.7% (Overall Capital Requirements) 10.8% to 19.7% TSCR Pillar 1 (Total SREP Pillar 1 (minimum Pillar 1 8% Capital (minimum (minimum requirement) Requirements) requirement) requirement) 9.5% to 11.7% Source: ECB, SSM SREP Methodology Booklet, 2016 edition; Lloyds Bank analysis 2017 Fully loaded Note 1: Phased-in latest by 2019 Note 2: Phased down by 2019. Estimated as difference between 2015 SREP and 2016 SREP Note 3: Based on a sample of 30 European banks, including KBC, Belfius, Danske, Nykredit, BNPP, Credit Ag, BPCE, SocGen, DB, Intesa, UniCredit, AIB, BoI, ABN AMRO, ING Group, Rabobank, DNB, Sabadell, Santander, 2 BBVA, Caixabank, Nordea, SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, RBS, StanChart Illustration: SREP requirements of selected European banks Current CET1 requirements reflect jurisdiction and business model 30 P2G CBR P2R Pillar 1 CET1 rao 25 20 (%) 15 10 5 0 DB BoI AIB SEB RBS KBC DNB BPCE HSBC BNPP BBVA Intesa Lloyds Belfius Danske Nordea SocGen Barclays Sabadell Nykredit Credit Ag Unicredit StanChart Rabobank Caixabank Santander Swedbank ING Group ABN AMRO Handeslbanken 4.3% 6.4% 2.9% 2.5% 1.3% 1.7% 2.0% 4.9% 1.8% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 6.8% 1.5% 1.6% 9.0% 9.0% 1.8% 2.8% 2.3% 4.4% 2.4% 3.2% 6.9% 3.9% 2.8% 7.0% 7.5% 4.8% 5.6% 12 7 18 21 30 27 24 9 25 16 14 13 6 29 28 1 1 25 19 23 11 22 17 5 15 20 4 3 10 8 Average implied buffer over requirement = 4.1% Source: Company FY2016 reporting, Lloyds Bank analysis Note: Analysis on a phase-in basis. DB and UniCredit respectively include €8bn and €13bn pro forma rights issue 3 12.8 0.40 12.8 Evolving regulation has led to significant increase in capital levels 7.00 Since 2008, European banks have doubled their Tier 1 capital ratios 5.70 5.45 Evolution of Tier 1 ratios (%) for 30 European Banks (2008 to 2016, quarterly data points) Ranking by Tier 1 ratio volatility 29.0 Swedbank, 5.6% 2008 2016 Total SHB, 4.9% CAGR average average increase AIB, 4.9% Nordea, 3.6% 8.34% 16.81% x2.0 10.5% DNB, 3.0% Danske, 3.0% 24.0 KBC, 3.0% SEB, 2.8% Lloyds, 2.7% RBS, 2.7% Nykredit, 2.6% 19.0 Intesa, 2.5% BoI, 2.4% ING Group, 2.2% 1.12 (%) DB, 2.1% Credit Ag, 1.9% 1.88 14.0 StanChart, 1.8% Rabobank, 1.8% ABN AMRO, 1.8% HSBC, 1.7% BNPP, 1.7% Barclays, 1.7% 9.0 SocGen, 1.7% Unicredit, 1.7% Sabadell, 1.6% BBVA, 1.6% Belfius, 1.5% 4.0 BPCE, 1.5% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Santander, 1.3% NordicsDanske GER/NEDNykredit FRA/BELCredit Ag SPA/ITAIntesa UK/IREAIB Caixabank, 1.2% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Source: Lloyds Bank, Bloomberg, company disclosure Note: Standard deviation used as an indication of volatility. Tier 1 ratios data has not been modified to correct the “upward trend / drift effect” in Tier 1 ratios that could potentially adds bias to the resulting volatilities (i.e. 8.43 higher volatilities would indicate the best performing banks that have increased the most their Tier 1 ratio over the period). Based on a sample of 30 European banks, including KBC, Belfius, Danske, Nykredit, BNPP, Credit 8.60 Ag, BPCE, SocGen, DB, Intesa, UniCredit, AIB, BoI, ABN AMRO, ING Group, Rabobank, DNB, Sabadell, Santander, BBVA, Caixabank, Nordea, SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, RBS, StanChart 4 12.8 0.40 12.8 Are required Pillar 2 buffers an indicator for volatility? 7.00 P2R not significantly correlated to volatility measures, other than capital levels 5.70 CET1 capital ratio Tier 1 capital ratio Total capital ratio 5.45 12 Correlation 6 Correlation 6 Correlation coefficient (ρ) 57% coefficient (ρ) 61% coefficient (ρ) 47% 11 5 5 10 4 4 9 8 3 3 7 2 2 Volatility of Tier 1ratio Tier of Volatility Volatility of CET1ratio Volatility 6 1 1 5 capital ratio Total of Volatility 4 0 0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.12 Level of Pillar 2 Requirement (P2R) Level of Pillar 2 Requirement (P2R) Level of Pillar 2 Requirement (P2R) Share price Net income RWA 1.88 20 5 160 Correlation Correlation 13% Correlation coefficient (ρ) 32% coefficient (ρ) 13% coefficient (ρ) 10% 18 5 140 16 4 120 14 4 100 12 3 10 3 80 8 2 of RWA Volatility 60 6 2 Volatility of Netincome Volatility Volatility of Share price Volatility 40 4 1 20 2 1 0 0 0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Level of Pillar 2 Requirement (P2R) Level of Pillar 2 Requirement (P2R) Level of Pillar 2 Requirement (P2R) 8.43 8.60 Source: Lloyds Bank, Bloomberg, company disclosure. Note: Volatilities calculated as standard deviation of quarterly reports since 2008, except for share price volatility calculated as the standard deviation over a two year period. Based on a sample of 30 European banks, including KBC, Belfius, Danske, Nykredit, BNPP, Credit Ag, BPCE, SocGen, DB, Intesa, UniCredit, AIB, BoI, ABN AMRO, ING Group, Rabobank, DNB, Sabadell, Santander, BBVA, 5 Caixabank, Nordea, SEB, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, RBS, StanChart Illustration of market impact of Pillar 2 framework (I) Impact of revised SREP framework on AT1 investment decision Perception of increased non-payment risk CET1 headroom over CBR within top 5 factors for all investors ? In light of the ECB/EBA's recent clarification that Pillar 2 should ? Where would you rank CET1 headroom over MDA and loss form part of minimum capital requirements plus buffers, in your absorption as a determining factor when making investment view, has MDA related coupon restriction risk increased? choice in AT1? Top 1 11% Top 3 32% Yes: 100% Top 5 58% Outside top 5 Not a factor 0% Increased awareness of Pillar 2 importance Non-SREP issuers favoured for AT1 issuance ? Do you factor Pillar 2 requirements into CET1 buffer analysis? ? Which Jurisdictions would you feel comfortable buying AT1 from (Top 10)? Belgium, 4% Switzerland, 19% No, 11% Spain, 4% Italy, 4% France, 6% Netherlands, 8% UK, 17% Yes, 89% Denmark, 10% Norway, 13% Sweden, 13% Source: Lloyds Bank AT1 investor survey, March 2016 6 12.8 0.40 12.8 Illustration of market impact of Pillar 2 framework (II) 7.00 Current AT1 yields exhibit observable relationship with MDA headroom 5.70 EUR AT1: phase-in USD AT1: phase-in GBP AT1: phase-in 5.45 Correlation Correlation Correlation 9 9 9 coefficient (ρ) -29% coefficient (ρ) -27% coefficient (ρ) -8% 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 AT1 Yield (%) Yield AT1 AT1 Yield (%) Yield AT1 AT1 Yield (%) Yield AT1 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 1.12 Distance to MDA Trigger Distance to MDA Trigger Distance to MDA Trigger EUR AT1: fully-loaded USD AT1: fully-loaded GBP AT1: fully-loaded 1.88 9 Correlation 9 Correlation 13% 9 Correlation coefficient (ρ) -40% coefficient (ρ) -31% coefficient (ρ) -28% 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 AT1 Yield (%) Yield AT1 AT1 Yield (%) Yield AT1 AT1 Yield (%) Yield AT1 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Distance to MDA Trigger Distance to MDA Trigger Distance to MDA Trigger 8.43 8.60 Source: Lloyds Bank, Bloomberg, company disclosure.
Recommended publications
  • PREFERENCE SHARES, NOMINAL VALUE of E2.24 PER SHARE, in the CAPITAL OF

    PREFERENCE SHARES, NOMINAL VALUE of E2.24 PER SHARE, in the CAPITAL OF

    11JUL200716232030 3JUL200720235794 11JUL200603145894 Public Offer by RFS Holdings B.V. FOR ALL OF THE ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING (FORMERLY CONVERTIBLE) PREFERENCE SHARES, NOMINAL VALUE OF e2.24 PER SHARE, IN THE CAPITAL OF ABN AMRO Holding N.V. Offer Memorandum and Offer Memorandum for ABN AMRO ordinary shares (incorporated by reference in this Offer Memorandum) 20 July 2007 This Preference Shares Offer expires at 15:00 hours, Amsterdam time, on 5 October 2007, unless extended. OFFER MEMORANDUM dated 20 July 2007 11JUL200716232030 3JUL200720235794 11JUL200603145894 PREFERENCE SHARES OFFER BY RFS HOLDINGS B.V. FOR ALL THE ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING PREFERENCE SHARES, NOMINAL VALUE OF e2.24 PER SHARE, IN THE CAPITAL OF ABN AMRO HOLDING N.V. RFS Holdings B.V. (‘‘RFS Holdings’’), a company formed by an affiliate of Fortis N.V. and Fortis SA/NV (Fortis N.V. and Fortis SA/ NV together ‘‘Fortis’’), The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (‘‘RBS’’) and an affiliate of Banco Santander Central Hispano, S.A. (‘‘Santander’’), is offering to acquire all of the issued and outstanding (formerly convertible) preference shares, nominal value e2.24 per share (‘‘ABN AMRO Preference Shares’’), of ABN AMRO Holding N.V. (‘‘ABN AMRO’’) on the terms and conditions set out in this document (the ‘‘Preference Shares Offer’’). In the Preference Shares Offer, RFS Holdings is offering to purchase each ABN AMRO Preference Share validly tendered and not properly withdrawn for e27.65 in cash. Assuming 44,988 issued and outstanding ABN AMRO Preference Shares outstanding as at 31 December 2006, the total value of the consideration being offered by RFS Holdings for the ABN AMRO Preference Shares is e1,243,918.20.
  • 18 February 2019 Solvency and Diversification in Insurance Remain Key Strengths Despite Change in Structure

    18 February 2019 Solvency and Diversification in Insurance Remain Key Strengths Despite Change in Structure

    FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ISSUER IN-DEPTH Lloyds Banking Group plc 18 February 2019 Solvency and diversification in insurance remain key strengths despite change in structure Summary RATINGS In 2018, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LBG) altered its structure to comply with the UK's ring- Lloyds Banking Group plc Baseline Credit a3 fencing legislation, which requires large banks to separate their retail and SME operations, Assessment (BCA) and deposit taking in the European Economic Area (EEA) from their other activities, including Senior unsecured A3 Stable the riskier capital markets and trading business. As part of the change, LBG designated Lloyds Bank plc as the“ring-fenced” entity housing its retail, SME and corporate banking operations. Lloyds Bank plc It also assumed direct ownership of insurer Scottish Widows Limited, previously a subsidiary Baseline Credit A3 Assessment (BCA) of Lloyds Bank. The changes had little impact on the creditworthiness of LBG and Lloyds Adjusted BCA A3 Bank, leading us to affirm the deposit and senior unsecured ratings of both entities. Scottish Deposits Aa3 Stable/Prime-1 Widows' ratings were unaffected. Senior unsecured Aa3 Stable » LBG's reorganisation was less complex than that of most UK peers. The Lloyds Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets plc Banking Group is predominantly focused on retail and corporate banking, and the Baseline Credit baa3 required structural changes were therefore relatively minor. The group created a small Assessment (BCA) separate legal entity, Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets plc (LBCM), to manage its limited Adjusted BCA baa1 Deposits A1 Stable/Prime-1 capital markets and trading operations, and it transferred its offshore subsidiary, Lloyds Issuer rating A1 Stable Bank International Limited (LBIL), to LBCM from Lloyds Bank.
  • How to Enter a Request for Transfer - Nordea Sweden

    How to Enter a Request for Transfer - Nordea Sweden

    How to enter a Request for Transfer - Nordea Sweden Transfer type Request Name and address of Beneficiary’s account number BIC code / Name of banker Reference lines code beneficiary SWIFT address Transfer between own 400 Min 1, max 4 lines Account number is used: Receiving bank’s BIC This field must not be Max 4 lines x 35 char accounts with Nordea Sweden (address information is retrieved 1) Personal account no = pers code - 8 or 11 filled in from the register of account reg no (YYMMDDXXXX) characters. This field numbers of Nordea, Sweden) 2) Other account nos = must be filled in 11 digits. Currency account NDEASESSXXX indicated by the 3-letter ISO code in the end Transfer to third party’s 401 Always fill in the name When using bank account no., Receiving bank’s BIC This field must not be 12 char account with Nordea Sweden see the below comments. In code - 8 or 11 filled in or to an account with another Sweden account nos consist of characters. This field Swedish bank 10 - 15 digits. must be filled in IBAN required for STP (straight through processing) Domestic payments to 402 Only fill in the name in line 1 Enter bankgiro no consisting of BGABSESS. This field This field must not be filled Max 4 lines x 35 char Bankgiro number - SEK only (other address information is 7 - 8 digits without blank spaces must be filled in. in. Instead BGABSESS retrieved from the Bankgiro etc should be entered in the register) In other currencies BIC code field than SEK: Receivning banks BIC code and bank account no.
  • Chronology, 1963–89

    Chronology, 1963–89

    Chronology, 1963–89 This chronology covers key political and economic developments in the quarter century that saw the transformation of the Euromarkets into the world’s foremost financial markets. It also identifies milestones in the evolu- tion of Orion; transactions mentioned are those which were the first or the largest of their type or otherwise noteworthy. The tables and graphs present key financial and economic data of the era. Details of Orion’s financial his- tory are to be found in Appendix IV. Abbreviations: Chase (Chase Manhattan Bank), Royal (Royal Bank of Canada), NatPro (National Provincial Bank), Westminster (Westminster Bank), NatWest (National Westminster Bank), WestLB (Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale), Mitsubishi (Mitsubishi Bank) and Orion (for Orion Bank, Orion Termbank, Orion Royal Bank and subsidiaries). Under Orion financings: ‘loans’ are syndicated loans, NIFs, RUFs etc.; ‘bonds’ are public issues, private placements, FRNs, FRCDs and other secu- rities, lead managed, co-managed, managed or advised by Orion. New loan transactions and new bond transactions are intended to show the range of Orion’s client base and refer to clients not previously mentioned. The word ‘subsequently’ in brackets indicates subsequent transactions of the same type and for the same client. Transaction amounts expressed in US dollars some- times include non-dollar transactions, converted at the prevailing rates of exchange. 1963 Global events Feb Canadian Conservative government falls. Apr Lester Pearson Premier. Mar China and Pakistan settle border dispute. May Jomo Kenyatta Premier of Kenya. Organization of African Unity formed, after widespread decolonization. Jun Election of Pope Paul VI. Aug Test Ban Take Your Partners Treaty.
  • Hsbc to Acquire Lloyds Banking Group Onshore Assets in the Uae

    Hsbc to Acquire Lloyds Banking Group Onshore Assets in the Uae

    Ab c 29 March 2012 HSBC TO ACQUIRE LLOYDS BANKING GROUP ONSHORE ASSETS IN THE UAE HSBC Bank Middle East Ltd (‘HSBC’), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings plc, has entered into an agreement to acquire the onshore retail and commercial banking business of Lloyds Banking Group (‘Lloyds’) in the United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’). The value of the gross assets being acquired is US$769m as at 31 December 2011. The transaction, which is subject to regulatory approvals, is expected to complete in 2012. HSBC’s largest operations in the MENA region are based in the UAE where HSBC enjoys a market-leading trade and commercial banking presence, in addition to the largest international retail banking and wealth management business. The business being acquired from Lloyds has approximately 8,800 personal and commercial customers and a loan book of approximately US$573m as at 31 December 2011. Commenting on the acquisition, Simon Cooper, Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HSBC in MENA, said: “HSBC is the leading international bank in the UAE and the addition of Lloyds’ strong presence in retail and commercial banking is highly complementary to our business. The acquisition underscores the strategic importance of the UAE, and of the MENA region as a whole, to HSBC.” Media enquiries to: Tim Harrison + 971 4 4235632 [email protected] Brendan McNamara +44 (0) 20 7991 0655 [email protected] ends/more Registered Office and Group Head Office: This news release is issued by 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ, United Kingdom Web: www.hsbc.com HSBC Holdings plc Incorporated in England with limited liability.
  • Natwest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays Pilot UK's First Business Banking Hubs

    Natwest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays Pilot UK's First Business Banking Hubs

    NatWest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays pilot UK’s first business banking hubs NatWest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays have announced that they will pilot the UK’s first shared business banking hubs. The first hub will open its door in Perry Barr, Birmingham today. The pilot will also see five other shared hubs open across the UK in the coming weeks The hubs have been specifically designed to enable businesses that manage cash and cheque transactions to pay in large volumes of coins, notes and cheques and complete cash exchange transactions. They will be available on a trial basis to pre-selected business clients in each local area and will offer extended opening times (8am to 8pm) 7 days a week, providing business and corporate customers more flexibility to manage their day-to-day finances. The hubs will be branded Business Banking Hub and they have been designed to enable business customers from Natwest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays to conduct transactions through a shared facility. Commenting on the launch of the pilot, Deputy CEO of NatWest Holdings and CEO of NatWest Commercial and Private Banking Alison Rose said: “We have listened to what our business customers really want from our cash services. It is now more important than ever that we continue to offer innovative services, and we are creating an infrastructure that allows small business owners and entrepreneurs to do what they do best - run their business. I look forward to continued working with fellow banks to ensure the UK's businesses are getting the support they deserve." Commenting on the support this will provide businesses, Paul Gordon, Managing Director of SME and Mid Corporates at Lloyds Bank Commercial Banking said: “SMEs are the lifeblood of the UK economy.
  • Svenska Handelsbanken AB

    Svenska Handelsbanken AB

    OFFERING CIRCULAR Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (Incorporated as a public limited liability banking company in The Kingdom of Sweden) U.S.$50,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme for the issue of Notes with a minimum maturity of one month On 26th June, 1992 Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (the “Issuer” or the “Bank”) entered into a U.S.$1,500,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the “Programme”) and issued an offering circular on that date describing the Programme. This Offering Circular supersedes any previous offering circular and supplements therein prepared in connection with the Programme. Any Notes (as defined below) issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Offering Circular are issued subject to the provisions described herein. This does not affect any Notes already in issue. Under the Programme, the Bank may from time to time issue Notes (the “Notes”), which expression shall include Notes (i) issued on a senior preferred basis as described in Condition 3 (“Senior Preferred Notes”), (ii) issued on a senior non-preferred basis as described in Condition 4 (“Senior Non-Preferred Notes”), (iii) issued on a subordinated basis and which rank on any voluntary or involuntary liquidation (Sw. likvidation) or bankruptcy (Sw. konkurs) of the Bank as described in Condition 5 (“Subordinated Notes”) and (iv) issued on a subordinated basis with no fixed maturity and which rank on any voluntary or involuntary liquidation (Sw. likvidation) or bankruptcy (Sw. konkurs) of the Bank as described in Condition 6 (“Additional Tier 1 Notes”). The Outstanding Principal Amount (as defined in Condition 2) of each Series (as defined below) of Additional Tier 1 Notes will be subject to Write Down (as defined in Condition 2) if the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio (as defined in Condition 2) of the Bank and/or the Handelsbanken Group (as defined Condition 2) is less than the relevant Trigger Level (as defined in Condition 2).
  • NETSUITE ELECTRONIC BANK PAYMENTS Securely Automate EFT Payments and Collections with a Single Global Solution

    NETSUITE ELECTRONIC BANK PAYMENTS Securely Automate EFT Payments and Collections with a Single Global Solution

    NETSUITE ELECTRONIC BANK PAYMENTS Securely Automate EFT Payments and Collections with a Single Global Solution Electronic Bank Payments brings to NetSuite complementary electronic banking functionality Key Features that includes Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) • Automated payment batch allows multiple payments, customer refunds and customer payment batch creation stemmed from payments (direct debits), as well as check fraud different batch criteria, controls and payment deadlines. prevention through the Positive Pay service offered by leading banks. It helps ensure that • Approval routing and email alert notification enables additional payment employees and vendors are paid on time authorization prior to payment processing. and customer bills are settled automatically. With support for a wide range of global and • Enhanced EFT capabilities with filtering options support bill display, partial payments, local bank formats, Electronic Bank Payments bill management and other controls. provides a single payment management • Automated direct debit customer solution worldwide. collections to settle outstanding invoices. Electronic Bank Payments creates files of • Payment management options include payments or direct debit information in bank’s payment batch queuing, rollbacks, reversals predefined file format ready for import into with notations and automated notifications. banking software or submission to the bank • Positive Pay anti-fraud capabilities with online, thus lowering payment processing proactive notification to banks processing expenses by eliminating checks, postage and the checks. envelopes, and saving time as well. In addition, • Support for more than 50 international it supports management of large payment bank formats with Advanced Electronic runs (typically up to 5,000 payments per file) Bank Payment License customers having with the ability to process reversals and partial the flexibility to add more.
  • Nordea Group Annual Report 2018

    Nordea Group Annual Report 2018

    Annual Report 2018 CEO Letter Casper von Koskull, President and Group CEO, and Torsten Hagen Jrgensen, Group COO and Deputy CEO. Page 4 4 Best and most accessible advisory, with an 21 easy daily banking experience, delivered at scale. Page 13 Wholesale Banking No.1 relationship Asset & Wealth bank in the Nordics Management with operational Personal Banking 13 excellence. Page 21 Commercial & Business Banking Our vision is to become the lead- ing Asset & Wealth Manager in the 25 Nordic market by 2020. Page 25 Best-in-class advisory and digital experience, 17 ef ciency and scale with future capabilities in a disruptive market. Page 17 Annual Report 2018 Contents 4 CEO letter 6 Leading platform 10 Nordea investment case – strategic priorities 12 Business Areas 35 Our people Board of Directors’ report 37 The Nordea share and ratings 40 Financial Review 2018 46 Business area results 49 Risk, liquidity and capital management 67 Corporate Governance Statement 2018 76 Non-Financial Statement 78 Conflict of interest policy 79 Remuneration 83 Proposed distribution of earnings Financial statements 84 Financial Statements, Nordea Group 96 Notes to Group fi nancial statements 184 Financial statements Parent company 193 Notes to Parent company fi nancial statements 255 Signing of the Annual Report 256 Auditor’s report Capital adequacy 262 Capital adequacy for the Nordea Group 274 Capital adequacy for the Nordea Parent company Organisation 286 Board of Directors 288 Group Executive Management 290 Main legal structure & Group organisation 292 Annual General Meeting & Financial calendar This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements macro economic development, (ii) change in the competitive that reflect management’s current views with respect to climate, (iii) change in the regulatory environment and other certain future events and potential fi nancial performance.
  • Invesco Premier Portfolio

    Invesco Premier Portfolio

    Invesco Premier Portfolio Portfolio Holdings Data as of September 30, 2020 4 2 3 Final Principal Market 1 Coupon/ Maturity Maturity Associated % of Amount Value ($) Name of Issue CUSIP Yield (%) Date Date Issuer Portfolio Asset Backed Commercial Paper ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER 30,000,000 29,994,592 Cancara Asset Securitization LLC (CEP-Lloyds Bank LLC) 13738JLQ1 0.20 11/24/2020 11/24/2020 LLOYDS BANKING GROUP 1.81 PLC 14,650,000 14,646,378 Collateralized Commercial Paper FLEX Co., LLC (CEP - JPMorgan Securities LLC) 19424HM80 0.23 12/08/2020 12/08/2020 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.88 10,000,000 10,003,982 Crown Point Capital Co., LLC-Series A (CEP-Credit Suisse AG) 22845ASD3 0.35 01/22/2021 01/22/2021 CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG 0.60 30,000,000 29,999,900 Ebury Finance LLC (Multi-CEP) 27873JK12 0.18 10/01/2020 10/01/2020 EBURY FINANCE LLC 1.81 10,000,000 9,998,744 Great Bridge Capital Company (CEP-Standard Chartered) 39021UL95 0.23 11/09/2020 11/09/2020 STANDARD CHARTERED PLC 0.60 25,000,000 24,995,856 Great Bridge Capital Company (CEP-Standard Chartered) 39021ULL8 0.23 11/20/2020 11/20/2020 STANDARD CHARTERED PLC 1.51 30,000,000 29,999,861 Institutional Secured Funding Ltd (Multi-CEP) 45779PK15 0.29 10/01/2020 10/01/2020 Institutional Secured 1.81 Funding LLC 6,900,000 6,897,730 LMA Americas LLC (CEP-Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank S.A.) 53944QLG3 0.19 11/16/2020 11/16/2020 CREDIT AGRICOLE GROUP 0.42 10,000,000 9,992,230 LMA Americas LLC (CEP-Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank S.A.) 53944QP38 0.24 02/03/2021 02/03/2021 CREDIT AGRICOLE GROUP 0.60 50,000,000 49,991,900 Ridgefield Funding Co.
  • United States of America Before the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Washington, D.C

    United States of America Before the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Washington, D.C

    DE NEDERLANDSCHE BANK N.V. AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION NEW YORK STATE BANKING DEPARTMENT NEW YORK, NEW YORK ____________________________________ In the Matter of ) ) FRB Dkt. No. 05-035-B-FB ABN AMRO BANK N.V. ) Amsterdam, The Netherlands ) Order to issue a Direction ) (in Dutch, “Besluit tot het geven van ABN AMRO BANK N.V. ) een aanwijzing”); NEW YORK BRANCH ) Order to Cease and Desist New York, New York ) Issued Upon Consent ) ABN AMRO BANK N.V. ) CHICAGO BRANCH, ) Chicago, Illinois ) ____________________________________) WHEREAS, De Nederlandsche Bank (“DNB”) is the home country supervisor of ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands (“ABN AMRO”), a Netherlands bank; WHEREAS, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board of Governors”) is the host country supervisor in the United States of ABN AMRO, which is both a foreign bank as defined in section 3101(7) of the International Banking Act (12 U.S.C. § 3101(7)), including its New York Branch and its Chicago Branch (collectively, the “Branches”), and a registered bank holding company; WHEREAS, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking (the “IDFPR”), pursuant to the authority provided under Section 3 of the Foreign Banking Office Act, (205 ILCS 645/1 et seq.) supervises and has examination authority over the foreign banking office maintained by ABN AMRO in the state of Illinois; WHEREAS, the New York State Banking Department (the “NYSBD”) is the licensing agency of the New York Branch of ABN AMRO, pursuant to Article II of the New York Banking Law (“NYBL”), and is responsible for the supervision and regulation thereof pursuant to the NYBL; WHEREAS, the Board of Governors, the NYSBD, the IDFPR (collectively, the “U.S.
  • SAP® SOLUTIONS and ACCOUNTING STRATEGIES © Copyright 2007 SAP AG

    SAP® SOLUTIONS and ACCOUNTING STRATEGIES © Copyright 2007 SAP AG

    SAP Solution in Detail SAP for Banking ACCOUNTING IN BANKS: SAP® SOLUTIONS AND ACCOUNTING STRATEGIES © Copyright 2007 SAP AG. All rights reserved. HTML, XML, XHTML and W3C are trademarks or registered trademarks of W3C®, World Wide Web Consortium, No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in Massachusetts Institute of Technology. any form or for any purpose without the express permission of SAP AG. The information contained herein may be changed Java is a registered trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc. without prior notice. JavaScript is a registered trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc., Some software products marketed by SAP AG and its distributors used under license for technology invented and implemented contain proprietary software components of other software by Netscape. vendors. MaxDB is a trademark of MySQL AB, Sweden. Microsoft, Windows, Excel, Outlook, and PowerPoint are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. SAP, R/3, mySAP, mySAP.com, xApps, xApp, SAP NetWeaver, Duet, PartnerEdge, and other SAP products and services IBM, DB2, DB2 Universal Database, OS/2, Parallel Sysplex, mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks MVS/ESA, AIX, S/390, AS/400, OS/390, OS/400, iSeries, pSeries, or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several xSeries, zSeries, System i, System i5, System p, System p5, System x, other countries all over the world. All other product and System z, System z9, z/OS, AFP, Intelligent Miner, WebSphere, service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective Netfinity, Tivoli, Informix, i5/OS, POWER, POWER5, POWER5+, companies. Data contained in this document serves informational OpenPower and PowerPC are trademarks or registered purposes only.