93640NCJRS.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
&4 .. ; , 4C .. » -~--- -~------- - \I If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .~.-;:,..-~~--=---=,,===- i[R~1l ,'0:""" .. 11+ .,... I:;;. '1~/D -~If Law Reform Commission C9mmission de reforme du dro~t 1+ of Canada . du Canada (\ ~) '" o I " 0 This microfiche was produced from documents received for 0. I Ci ~ , inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise J, control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, i the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on I this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. ., i \' 1.0 ·7 1 1 11 • I 1.8 ORIGINS' OF WRIT OF ASSISTANCE SEARCH IN E.NGLAND, AND ITS HISTORICAL BACKGROUND IN CANADA , (I. 111111.2~ 111111.4 11111 i.6 . 4' G Q ,\ C by .1, MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART Maurice H. Smith W,TIONAL BU~EAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A , . (, . U.S. Department of Juatlce 93640 Natlonallnstllute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or .organlzatlon orlglnallng It. Points of view or opinions stated In this document are 11),0se of the authors and do not necessarily represent the Official position or 'Policies of the Natlonaldnstitute,of (, Justice. o Permlss!on )0 reproduce thIs copyrighled material has been granted by \'\J -.Law Refonn camussion of y,nada to th/i Nalional Crimlnat Justice Reference Service (NSjRS). J! G ". FUrther reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis sion of the cop~rlghtpwner. " .' " ' ( ,)" !+· , ~ana,a G\\ " d o o () 0" "t....... " .) Q I.·j o D ". 'I) o \) o ~ (\ ORIGINS , . AND O~IT OF ASSISTANCE SEARCH IN ENGLAND, ITS HISTORICAL BACISGRO~ND IN CANADA o o o \\ o o A Study Paper ,prepared for the 1.1 Law Reforll} Conunis.s;i..on of ,'Canada c' o () o o o o NCJRS " I,.) by o " ",J I, o c Mauriee H. o o 0<7 " . I! o [) '10 " .;. Or .• ~.~':?~~ , ' ,'; ,'," ~ , o '0 \1(lJ o ,\ o o , o () 0 o CONTENTS Cl 0 1--."_____ ~I )l o o o o Introduct.ion •••••••••.•• ....................... ';, 1 0, , I t <: ) () Part I: Beginnings • • I~' •• ',,\' ••••••• •••• ~ •• '.... 0, _••••••• 7 Q 1. Focus ••••••••• 'I ••••••••••••• "t • ' ••••••••••••••••• 7 2. The Writ of Assistance: preliminary Inspect.ion 8 3. The Act Bespeaking the Writ ••••.••••••.•••.• 10 \ 4. Doctrinal Provenance of the Writ..... • •.• 11 's. Exchequer Issuance of the Writ ••••••••••. • ••• 14 (, 6. Rationale of the Writ ••••••••••••••• II • • • ••• 15 7. Prepist.ory of Writ of,Assist.ance Search.. • ••• 17 ,l, 8. A bonstitutiona1 Meditation .~ ••.•••••••••••••• ® 19 ,: 9. (, Cornmon-Law Influences on the 1662 Legislation •• 19 \\ 10. ThG Begetter? •••••••• H •••• , •••••••••••••••• 1:)' ',,' • 22 Q () ~ Part II: Legislat.ive Legerdemain •••••••••••••••••••• 25 1. Scope oj the ],662 Provision ••••••" •••••••••••••• 25 2. Condi tioning ...... .-;" ... rtt •••.•• 0 • ~' ..........,', •• 0'" •• 26 c.. 4 •••••••••••••.••••• Q ~C () 3. Fog Signal ............ '..... 27 4. The Act of 169\ql 0." •••••••• ~ ~." ••••• ~ •••• t. It ••••• "~a 29 'D 5. .Q,enouement _~~ • 'o~ • IJ •• t, ••••• ~ it.~\,. ~ ................... c- 31 o Le titre' de la version frangaise est:,~ D '" 0' " " Part III: Transplant •••• ~ ••••• ~ •••• , • e.- ••••• ,' •• ~ •••• . 37 t de main-forte en Angleterre L'origine du manda et son hist.orique au Can~ada 1. The Townshend En'actment in P~ospect· •••••••••••• 37 r.J 2. The Townshend En,actrnent .,••••••••••••••••••••••• 39 3. A ~rick of the T~ade ••••••••.••••••••••••••••••'" 40 4. More Finesefe • D, .... '.' •••••• ~ •• ~ •••• , ••••••••••••• 'j( • 42 ,] 5. Errol' of omiss1.on •• ',', •••••••••••••••••., •••••.. f. • 43 6. A Corners tone .......... Q •• •••••••••••••••••••••• 46 C) Part. IV: Mutation ~ ••••••••••••••••• 00 •••• 8 ~ •••••••••• 47 1. I;:Iark ... Bacl<; to 1 7~6c7 ••••••••••••• ' •• • 1. ·.. ',,' ·· .. '. ·. 47 2. The Writ as It Began in Canada •••••••• ~ •••••••• 48 Limit.ed Edition " II •••••• ada 3. The Slip Showing • '0) ,) •••••••••••• ;:; ••••••••• 49 (C) M' 'st.et of Supply and Services Gan 1984 4. The S,lip 0 Compounded •••• ,•••••••••••••••••••••• ,•• 52 ~n~ catalogue ~o. J32-~/35E 5. Legis~atl\re Fog Yet. Again •••• '. fo • • • • • ••' • • • • ••• " • 54 « ISBN 0-662.,..13158-4 6. The ~egacy of 1825 . .. .. ~ . .. 56 o . ',) {\ ," \I • (J " ,0 II 1,\ ilO , I \, ") o ;, .., ... ., ,. ~~· __.i~ ........~_ 0' o , .>::;:,:~~.;:;:=~~~~~_,,;,,;:t~...... -.-~ ___ ,...,.._ .. ~",~.>... \)-~ o Cl :~ o ')11 !, ACKNOWLEDGMENT , ; ':::2 Page ! My thanks are offered to the, Canadian" and United Kingdom archival inl?titutio~.§-/ and their 'staffs, and also to 7. ' The Canadian Matrix ••••••.••• ~ ••••••••••••• 0' ••• 0. 57 ~ihe Massachusetts' Historical' Society, fppon whose generous A TWl. tch" of U'kta v,i sm? •••••••••.•••••••••••• 0 •••••• 59 " l:ielp I have been heavily\rclependent. I; ~. The 6~Ub of the ,Modern Canadian / wri t •••••••••••• 60 ", \1 , 10. A Secret S;' <'lInbl ed Upon? •••••,.;-1 •••••• '" •• " • • .,~ ••• 61 "11. Wri ts of Wl.at Assistance? ' •••••••••.••••••••• : •• 62 M.H.S. 12. Legislation on the Loose A,gain ••••••••••••••••• 63 13. Root" of the. Rot ..... 0 ••••• 0 •••••••••• ;:.•••• " -e 0 0 ''';. 64 0 c.' --z; Part V:, Retrospect from Limbo • 0 ............' ••••••••••"' 65 . " · t . l' M' 11 I, f~ " 0 1. H~s or~c~ ~~ce~~~a ••• d''1~" •••••• : .' •••••••••• 5 2., ,9 A JQ_b Sk~mped. • ••• iC •••• 0 ••••• ~ ••• 0 • ~ ••••••••••• o ":v " 68 J~wy) 3. Tool s Too Few ..• 0 ••••••••.• ................... Ii •• 70 ) A \~) Appendix A: Writ of Assistance (English), /\ o Mid-Eighteenth Century .~ ••••••••• ~ •••••••• 75 ,.1 " \\ Appendix ij: Case for the Opinion of AttDrney Q General William De Grey "touching ,--.. the Granting Writts of Assistants I ' ~/ .' • II. () . ~ 'J ~n Amer~ca , 1768 •••••••" ••• ~ •••••• ~ •••I' ••• ~ 0 79 Appendix C:' Form qf Writ of Assistance for G British North America, 1768-69 • • • • n • • • • • • \.1 o '.,) o Endnotes • ." •• ! •••••••••••••••••• 4 • ~ •••• 0 •••••••••••••• 89 191 o d Ii o II o :.) o o d) \ r \j \\ c;" () o 1 o ,'i' : , o i) ~ ~ ~ '.-'-:"'~~I::o;:f:;~.r-;;w.:.",~~... '=""'''''''-~'''''~'''''''''' •. ".' "'~''''.''v.-.. ,-"-twl~.X'''.~"..o"1;<'-'''' " o ~ .• o i) .j II INTRODUCTION " iJ ~ This' paper describes the English origins of the wide and peremptory' power to search private premises, identi,fied with the writ of assistance; its introduction into British t:;J North America; and its provenance in current Canadian federal law. ' (I P~~t'I, tells how writ of assistanc'e search began, in ... ';Z: customs enforcement; how; with the conciliar jurisdictions \) formerly s,ustaining them no longer- availabt.£e, customs powers to seek out smuggled' goods ashore were established by " u statute in the" Restoration period. Single-instance search warr:c;tnts for undutied goods. were authorized by a stop-gap Act~n 1660. Writ of assistance search, al-t;.)?gether more novel juridically, arrived in 1662, with section 5 (2) of the Act for preventing Frauds, and regu).·~ting Abuses in his Majesty's 'Customs, a compendium of cu~tomE; enforcement law usually known as the ~ct of Frauds, 1~62. Section ,,5 (2) I S power of search, conferred upon "Persons authorised by Writ" o-f Assistance", was to father much misunderst.ahding. The ;'writ 'it spoke of was not among the various kinds of writs of ass,/:!s-tance already in being. It added to them, as an instrument· which bade practically' everyone in the kipgdom r;facilitate the8 ct1stoms officElr's search. Especially in point would" be t.he local" p~ace, officer whose attendance ' "assistance" in contemporary usage - section 5(2) went on to make another precondition of the search (probably the more" su,pstantive ccondition'; indeed). Essentially a mandate for assis;tance, the writ deployed "under the 1662 Act manifestly was n~~ the sour,ce of the search power. A contrary. notion, that the wr~t of assistance was like a search warrant, has been encouraged to persist by an accident of language. Section' 5 (2) 1'9 "Persons, authorised by Writ of Assistance" signifi'~d If" identity vouched for by the writ. Used in this sense, nd,!Jl ~ ~ long obsolete, "authorised" has heLr>ed mask the truth that the searcsh power involving a wr'it of assistance stemmed from r~ " =:r " the statute direct. II '::' Sanction :eor this newly begotten writ of assistance ::J was in a common law doctrinet propounded by Coke as "a " secret in law" ,0 by which writs might be invented for the " better. implementation of a public Act of Parliament, 0 II according to the force and 'effect of the act ". The Act of i! ~, .. ,J \ 1" ~'\ 1 ",,) u' II () '" [OJ ~~:l C , \ P o II 0 ..; -.,.,- "'V --- - ------,.- --_ ----- --~---------- <I Ii Frauds, l66~ 6 bespoke the writ of ass~stan~e in section puzzlement in" Connecticut led to a ;:bronouneement from the 5(2) i validation 'for the actual content of the ~ writ was iq .. ," English attorney general to very jdifferent effect. It section 3 2 t wherein was an" almost, uni ve~sal obliga,j-iion to to assist in customs "law eriforceIIlent. centred upon yet another peculiari tyl in section 5 (2) of the Act of Frauds, 1662: the writ 0;£ assistance was to be Part II considers further legislative curiositi,es, al.ly "und7r the Seal of His Majestyl s Count of Exchequer II • impacting on Bl:,itish North Amer-ica., Prominent among'? them,' Noth~ng" else ~oUld, do, it was insistedinot even the seal of section 5 (2) • s definition of what writ of assistance search a colon~al court w~th exchequer jurisdiction. And since the proce~s of t,he Court .of Ex<:hequer did not extend to the was targeted upon:n II any Kind of Gqods or' MerchaI\di:e what colon~es, wr~ t., of ass~stance search COUld, have no lawful soev\2!r, prohibited and, uncustomed II .'1 Only at a very ~mplaus place there., ibl'e' pinch "COUld the II and II be realF disjunctively. ""However else they might o£fend - dutyevasi\~n( even· - goods we~e, nO'1: leg,ally susceptible of "writ, c;>f ass~stance search unles~' ~hey , Incredulous indignation in the Treasury notwi thstand were a prohil;>i, ted import or export Jl . A ~ormula t?US '1~m~ ted /1 ~ng, t~ere was, nothing for it but remedial legislation.