Medium Wave DRM Field Test Results in Urban and Rural Environments David Guerra, Gorka Prieto, Igor Fernández, José M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Medium Wave DRM Field Test Results in Urban and Rural Environments David Guerra, Gorka Prieto, Igor Fernández, José M. Matías, Pablo Angueira, Juan Luis Ordiales Department of Electronics & Telecommunications Bilbao Engineering College (University of the Basque Country) Alameda Urkijo s/n. 48013 Bilbao. SPAIN Abstract This paper presents the results of the first Spanish field trial carried out to analyze a DRM (Digital Radio Mondiale) system in the medium-wave band. A 4-kW average power omni directional ground-wave experimental DRM transmission at a frequency of 1359 kHz was surveyed by means of a measurement vehicle for fixed and mobile reception. Several radial routes starting from the transmitter site provided rural and suburban behavior features of the system. Urban reception trials were performed in several dense and open streets of Madrid, within the expected coverage area. Field strength threshold values were determined for the tested transmission configurations and compared with the AM ground-wave ITU model predictions. Reliability versus distance from the transmitter is stated in this paper for different transmission configurations and the causes of dropouts for different reception conditions are explained. This analysis took into account subjective quality features of each configuration, providing practical planning parameter values. Keywords Digital AM, digital audio broadcasting, digital radio, DRM, medium wave. I. INTRODUCTION DRM (Digital Radio Mondiale) is the only universal non-proprietary digital radio system for broadcasting audio in the frequency bands below 30 MHz. It is designed to fit in with the existing AM broadcast band frequency plans, based on signals of 9 kHz or 10 kHz bandwidth. DRM radio system is capable of providing near-FM quality audio and it has the capacity to integrate data and text. In addition, DRM OFDM-based modulation along with guard interval techniques allows the implementation of single frequency networks (SFN) [1]. Several broadcasters, manufactures, research institutions and regulatory bodies integrate nowadays the international DRM consortium formed in 1998. In the different consortium working groups, technical, promotional and standardization tasks are carried out. One of the main results of this collaborative effort is the successful launch of commercial emissions in June 2003 by 16 of the leading international broadcasters. The actual, much longer, DRM services schedule can be found in [2]. The achievements of the status of ETSI Standard [3] and IEC International Standard [4], and the ITU procedural change [5] which allows the DRM use of the current analogue assignments in Regions 1 and 3, have also been important milestones. Despite the present availability of several DRM services and the achieved standardizations, an intense DRM analysis work is being performed. There is still a need for network parameter planning values measured on the field and also a need to analyze the behavior of the DRM system under several reception conditions. These tasks are mainly focusing on short-wave ionospheric long-range [6] transmissions [7] whereas there is a lack of testing of medium-wave ground wave propagated DRM signals. This medium frequency band propagation, traditionally of high importance in the AM radio broadcasting in Spain, has been chosen to carry out the DRM measurement campaign presented in this paper. First in this paper the objectives are explained. Then, the measurement campaign is presented by describing the broadcasting network, the reception and measuring systems, the campaign planning and the methodology used in these tests. After the measurement campaign description, the data processing method is detailed and the associated results are described in several graphs and tables. This results section is divided into subsections following the objectives initially proposed. Finally the most relevant conclusions are summarized. II. OBJECTIVES The main objective of this work has been to put under test the reception of DRM audio services in the medium-wave band broadcasted with different DRM transmission modes [3], under different reception conditions. This overall target was divided into the following specific objectives: • Study of the performance of different DRM transmission configurations in medium-wave reception. • Analysis of the DRM coverage range and field strength threshold in static reception for each analyzed mode comparatively with the corresponding AM range. • Study of the mobile DRM reception with different transmission modes and determine on the field the critical reception factors. III. MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN Broadcasting Network The tested DRM broadcast features are shown in Table 1. The AM transmitter facilities used for the tests are located in Arganda del Rey which is 25 kilometers from downtown Madrid. The DRM standard [3] provides several configurable transmission parameters that allow many different DRM transmission modes with different robustness against noise, multipath and interference. The more robust the mode, the less maximum subjective audio quality can be achieved due to a lower useful bit rate available. In order to evaluate the influence of each parameter the modes in Table 2 were chosen for the tests. The OFDM configurations A and B of the DRM standard are the only ones that fulfill the ITU constraints of medium-wave signal bandwidth in Spain [9]. A broader explanation of the number of carriers, guard interval, protection and interleaving algorithms, and Main Service Channel (MSC), Service Description Channel (SDC) modulations is out of the scope of this article and can be found in detail in [3]. The first column of Table 2 is a reference code included for the sake of briefness when referring to a combination of parameters in the rest of this paper. The DRM modes in Table 2 are ordered from less to more robust as can be deduced from the corresponding useful bit rate which decreases from the top to the bottom of the table. The maximum subjective audio quality provided by each DRM mode depends on the audio coding parameters, which are in turn determined by the available useful bit rate. Thus it is possible to compare the maximum subjective audio quality that the modes in Table 2 can provide. Reception and Measurement System The measurement vehicle was equipped as shown in Figure 1 where three sections are distinguished: The acquisition and distribution system, the measurement system and the control system. The acquisition system was composed of the fully characterized short monopole active antenna R&S HE010 mounted on top of the van with a specific ground plane. The signal received by the antenna was distributed to the measurement equipment by means of a splitter system formed by two power dividers. A first divider fed the received signal on the one hand to a DRM monitoring receiver and on the other hand to the second divider that in turn fed the received signal to a second measurement block. The DRM monitoring receiver was composed of an AR7030 analogue front- end modified to be capable of tuning the received DRM signal an down convert it to a 12 kHz IF channel. A SB Extigy sound card sampled this IF signal into a PC which ran the professional Windows based Fraunhofer Software Radio DRM demodulator. The second measurement block was made up of a Vector Signal Analyzer which provided RF spectrum captures and a Field Meter to measure the RF power level field strength in the DRM signal bandwidth. The last section was based on a laptop computer running a control software over a GNU/Linux platform which had the tasks of configuring and controlling the rest of the equipment, calculate some on-the-run statistics, coordinate the time/position/trip measuring, and conveniently store all the captured and calculated data. Ancillary data were provided by a GPS receiver and a trigger system which was generated every wheel turn. The control section was completed with a GSM remote control system for the DRM modulator located in Arganda which allowed the quick on-board changing of the DRM transmission mode via GPRS (General Packet Radio System) data calls between two identical GPRS modules, one located in the van, the other in the transmitter site. This remote control system for the modulator allows the analysis of all the proposed DRM modes with the same propagation conditions i.e. in the same point and consecutively. Measurement Methodology The measurement campaign included measurements in static locations and mobile measurements along routes which were planned following environmental criteria. The distinction made between static and mobile reception is based on the two kinds of radio listeners: the “on board” ones and the “on foot” ones and it reflects the most difficult reception conditions featured by mobile reception mainly due to fast signal variations. Radial Routes The first set of measurements was captured along radial routes from the transmitter, as shown in Figure 2, featuring mainly rural and suburban environments and thus, locations where man-made noise level was expected to remain quite low. The sporadic presence of power plants, high-voltage power lines and urban cores in certain locations of these mainly rural-suburban routes is an exception to the aforementioned lack of noise and must be taken into account in the subsequent data analysis. Modes 1, 4 and 5E were measured in 42 static locations and along a total number of 2200 km in order to determine their coverage ranges. The less robust mode 1E was not measured in these routes as its expected coverage range was too low. Madrid Routes The second set of measurements was planned in the urban environment of Madrid as shown in Figure 3. The routes and static locations were selected to represent from wide avenues to the densest urban environment in Madrid. Distance from the transmitter and the direction of the route (radial and circular) with respect to the transmitter were also taken into account. Modes 1, 4 and 5E were tested in 19 static locations, along 470 km overall.