Sep-14-15-Full-Agenda.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sep-14-15-Full-Agenda.Pdf TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY California State University Office of the Chancellor—Glenn S. Dumke Auditorium* 401 Golden Shore Long Beach, CA 90802 Agenda September 14-15, 2021 Time** Committee Location1 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 8:30 a.m. Board of Trustees—Closed Session Executive Personnel Matters Government Code §11126(a)(1) Pending Litigation Government Code §11126(e)(1) Vakilzadeh, et al. v. CSU Higley, et al. v. CSU Anticipated Litigation 9:15 a.m. Committee on Collective Bargaining—Closed Session Government Code §3596(d) 10:00 a.m. State of the California State University 11:00 a.m. Public Comment—Open Session 12:30 p.m. Lunch Break 1 The September 14-15, 2021, meeting will take place entirely virtually via teleconference. *PLEASE NOTE: Due to the Governor’s proclamation of a State of Emergency resulting from the threat of COVID-19, and pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20 issued on March 12, 2020, and March 17, 2020, respectively, all members of the Board of Trustees may participate in this meeting remotely, either by telephonic or video conference means. Out of consideration for the health, safety and well-being of the members of the public and the Chancellor’s Office staff, the Dumke Auditorium will not be open to the public during the meeting, and no Trustees or staff will be present in the Auditorium. Members of the public may offer public comment pursuant to the revised published protocol for “Addressing the Board of Trustees” as noted in this agenda. **The Board of Trustees is a public body, and members of the public have a right to attend and participate in its meetings. This schedule of meetings is established as a best approximation of how long each scheduled meeting will take to complete its business. Each meeting will be taken in sequence, except in unusual circumstances. Depending on the length of the discussions, which are not possible to predict with precision in advance, the scheduled meeting times indicated may vary widely. For two-day meetings, items scheduled for one day may be heard either the day before or the day after depending upon the time spent on each matter. The public is advised to take this uncertainty into account in planning to attend any meeting listed on this schedule. 1 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 (cont.) 1:00 p.m. Committee on Audit Consent Action 1. Approval of Minutes Information 2. Status Report on Audit and Advisory Services Activities 1:05 p.m. Committee on Committees Consent Action 1. Approval of Minutes Action 2. Amendments to Board of Trustees’ Standing Committee Assignments for 2021-2022 1:10 p.m. Committee on Educational Policy Consent Action 1. Approval of Minutes Action 2. Academic Master Plan Update: Fast-Track Programs Discussion Action 3. Amendment to Title 5 Regulations: Credit for Prior Learning Information 4. Research, Scholarship and Creative Activities Information 5. Graduation Initiative 2025 2:40 p.m. Committee on Finance Consent Action 1. Approval of Minutes Information 2. California State University Quarterly Investment Report Discussion Information 3. Annual Systemwide Report on Hate Incidents on Campus Information 4. Planning for the 2022-2023 Operating Budget *PLEASE NOTE: Due to the Governor’s proclamation of a State of Emergency resulting from the threat of COVID-19, and pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20 issued on March 12, 2020, and March 17, 2020, respectively, all members of the Board of Trustees may participate in this meeting remotely, either by telephonic or video conference means. Out of consideration for the health, safety and well-being of the members of the public and the Chancellor’s Office staff, the Dumke Auditorium will not be open to the public during the meeting, and no Trustees or staff will be present in the Auditorium. Members of the public may offer public comment pursuant to the revised published protocol for “Addressing the Board of Trustees” as noted in this agenda. **The Board of Trustees is a public body, and members of the public have a right to attend and participate in its meetings. This schedule of meetings is established as a best approximation of how long each scheduled meeting will take to complete its business. Each meeting will be taken in sequence, except in unusual circumstances. Depending on the length of the discussions, which are not possible to predict with precision in advance, the scheduled meeting times indicated may vary widely. For two-day meetings, items scheduled for one day may be heard either the day before or the day after depending upon the time spent on each matter. The public is advised to take this uncertainty into account in planning to attend any meeting listed on this schedule. 2 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 (cont.) 4:00 p.m. Committee on Institutional Advancement Consent Action 1. Approval of Minutes Discussion Action 2. Naming of Martin V. Smith Hall – California State University Channel Islands Information 3. 2021-2022 California State University Trustees’ Award for Outstanding Achievement WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2021 8:30 a.m. Committee on Governmental Relations Consent Action 1. Approval of Minutes Discussion Information 2. State Legislative Update 9:00 a.m. Committee on University and Faculty Personnel Consent Action 1. Approval of Minutes Discussion Action 2. Executive Compensation: Presidential Triennial Performance Review Salary Assessment – Implementation Process 10:00 a.m. Board of Trustees Call to Order Roll Call Chair’s Report Academic Senate CSU Report: Chair—Robert Keith Collins California State Student Association Report: President—Isaac Alferos California State University Alumni Council Report: President—Jeremy Addis-Mills *PLEASE NOTE: Due to the Governor’s proclamation of a State of Emergency resulting from the threat of COVID-19, and pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20 issued on March 12, 2020, and March 17, 2020, respectively, all members of the Board of Trustees may participate in this meeting remotely, either by telephonic or video conference means. Out of consideration for the health, safety and well-being of the members of the public and the Chancellor’s Office staff, the Dumke Auditorium will not be open to the public during the meeting, and no Trustees or staff will be present in the Auditorium. Members of the public may offer public comment pursuant to the revised published protocol for “Addressing the Board of Trustees” as noted in this agenda. **The Board of Trustees is a public body, and members of the public have a right to attend and participate in its meetings. This schedule of meetings is established as a best approximation of how long each scheduled meeting will take to complete its business. Each meeting will be taken in sequence, except in unusual circumstances. Depending on the length of the discussions, which are not possible to predict with precision in advance, the scheduled meeting times indicated may vary widely. For two-day meetings, items scheduled for one day may be heard either the day before or the day after depending upon the time spent on each matter. The public is advised to take this uncertainty into account in planning to attend any meeting listed on this schedule. 3 Consent Action 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Board of Trustees Meeting of July 14, 2021 Action 2. Approval of Committee Resolutions as follows: Committee on Committees 2. Amendments to Board of Trustees’ Standing Committee Assignments for 2021-2022 Committee on Educational Policy 2. Academic Master Plan Update: Fast-Track Programs 3. Amendment to Title 5 Regulations: Credit for Prior Learning Committee on Institutional Advancement 2. Naming of Martin V. Smith Hall – California State University Channel Islands Committee on University and Faculty Personnel 2. Executive Compensation: Presidential Triennial Performance Review Salary Assessment – Implementation Process 11:15 a.m. Board of Trustees—Closed Session Executive Personnel Matters Government Code §11126(a)(1) *PLEASE NOTE: Due to the Governor’s proclamation of a State of Emergency resulting from the threat of COVID-19, and pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20 issued on March 12, 2020, and March 17, 2020, respectively, all members of the Board of Trustees may participate in this meeting remotely, either by telephonic or video conference means. Out of consideration for the health, safety and well-being of the members of the public and the Chancellor’s Office staff, the Dumke Auditorium will not be open to the public during the meeting, and no Trustees or staff will be present in the Auditorium. Members of the public may offer public comment pursuant to the revised published protocol for “Addressing the Board of Trustees” as noted in this agenda. **The Board of Trustees is a public body, and members of the public have a right to attend and participate in its meetings. This schedule of meetings is established as a best approximation of how long each scheduled meeting will take to complete its business. Each meeting will be taken in sequence, except in unusual circumstances. Depending on the length of the discussions, which are not possible to predict with precision in advance, the scheduled meeting times indicated may vary widely. For two-day meetings, items scheduled for one day may be heard either the day before or the day after depending upon the time spent on each matter. The public is advised to take this uncertainty into account in planning to attend any meeting listed on this schedule. 4 REVISED Addressing the Board of Trustees *PLEASE NOTE: Due to the Governor’s proclamation of a State of Emergency resulting from the threat of COVID-19, and pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20 issued on March 12, 2020, and March 17, 2020, respectively, the Board of Trustees meeting will take place entirely virtually on Tuesday, September 14, 2021, and Wednesday, September 15, 2021.
Recommended publications
  • Campuses of the California State University 1
    Campuses of the California State University 1 5500 University Parkway CAMPUSES OF THE San Bernardino, CA 92407-2318 Dr. Tomás D. Morales, President CALIFORNIA STATE (909) 537-5000 www.csusb.edu (https://www.csusb.edu/) UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD 5500 Campanile Drive 9001 Stockdale Highway San Diego, CA 92182 Bakersfield, CA 93311-1022 Dr. Adela de la Torre, President Dr. Lynnette Zelezny, President (619) 594-5200 (661) 654-2782 www.sdsu.edu (https://www.sdsu.edu/) www.csub.edu (http://www.csub.edu/) SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHANNEL ISLANDS 1600 Holloway Avenue One University Drive San Francisco, CA 94132 Camarillo, CA 93012 Dr. Lynn Mahoney, President Dr. Erika D. Beck, President (415) 338-1111 (805) 437-8400 www.sfsu.edu (http://www.sfsu.edu/) www.csuci.edu (http://www.csuci.edu/) SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO One Washington Square 400 West First Street San José, CA 95192-0001 Chico, CA 95929 Dr. Mary A. Papazian, President Dr. Gayle E. Hutchinson, President (408) 924-1000 (530) 898-4636 www.sjsu.edu (http://www.sjsu.edu/) www.csuchico.edu (http://www.csuchico.edu/) HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, DOMINGUEZ HILLS 1 Harpst Street 1000 East Victoria Street Arcata, CA 95521-8299 Carson, CA 90747 Dr. Tom Jackson, Jr., President Dr. Thomas A. Parham, President (707) 826-3011 (310) 243-3696 www.humboldt.edu (https://www.humboldt.edu/) www.csudh.edu (http://www.csudh.edu/) CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST BAY 1250 Bellflower Boulevard 25800 Carlos Bee Boulevard Long Beach, CA 90840-0115 Hayward, CA 94542 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download De La Torre Article
    JHHXXX10.1177/1538192713515909Journal of Hispanic Higher Educationde la Torre 515909research-article2014 Article Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 2014, Vol. 13(2) 116 –134 Benevolent Paradox: © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: Integrating Community- sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1538192713515909 Based Empowerment and jhh.sagepub.com Transdisciplinary Research Approaches Into Traditional Frameworks to Increase Funding and Long-Term Sustainability of Chicano- Community Research Programs Adela de la Torre1 Abstract Niños Sanos, Familia Sana (NSFS) is a 5-year multi-intervention study aimed at preventing childhood obesity among Mexican-origin children in rural California. Using a transdisciplinary approach and community-based participatory research (CBPR) methodology, NSFS’s development included a diversely trained team working in collaboration with community partners. The systematic development of the research funding application and the iterative proposal-development process provide the basis for understanding greater opportunities for funding, and modifications needed to be successful with higher level sponsors of CBPR projects. Resumen Niños Sanos, Familia Sana (NSFS) es un estudio de cinco años de intervención múltiple enfocado a la prevención de obesidad en la niñez entre los niños de origen mexicano y rural en California. Usando un enfoque tras-disciplinario y metodología CBPR, el programa NSFS incluyó un equipo diversamente entrenado en colaboración 1University of California, Davis, USA Corresponding Author: Adela de la Torre, Vice Chancellor–Student Affairs, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Email: [email protected] de la Torre 117 con socios comunitarios. El desarrollo sistemático de la solicitud de fondos para la investigación y el proceso iterativo de la propuesta, proveen las bases para entender oportunidades más grandes de fondeo, y modificaciones necesarias para tener éxito con donadores de alto nivel para proyectos CBPR.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Industry Bulletin July 2019
    VOLUME 2 • ISSUE 7 www.spaceindustrybulletin.com Space Industry Bulletin Market analysis and business intelligence for the space community Commercialising LEO will need destinations beyond the ISS ommercialisation of low investors. And it will depend on and a few private companies Earth orbit will require having destinations beyond just does not make a sustainable in - Cnew models for public- the International Space Station. frastructure. So how do we build private partnership, and it will be For almost two decades, the this community? built on a technology infras- ISS has been the sole hub for Kerry Timmons, LEO com - tructure that will include the commercialisation activities, pro - mercial programme manage - CONTENTS likes of robotics and machine viding unique access to research ment lead at Lockheed Martin learning. and development in a micro- Space, said: “It requires collab - Industry news 2 But commercial success will gravity environment. oration. It needs ‘old space’ and l Virgin Galactic to go public hinge on an infrastructure that Doug Comstock, deputy chief ‘new space’ working in partner - following merger “buys down the risk” for financial officer for integration ship. It needs the commercial l Launch of balloon marks the commercial partners and at NASA, said: “The ISS has 14 market to be energised to bring beginning of a new space era different facilities built by 11 dif - their money and ideas to space.” l Innovation loans offer a share of ferent companies. We don’t want When we talk about commer - £10m funding a gap in capability for human cialising LEO, it’s important to l Galileo outage helps build the access to LEO.” recognise that space is not the case for sovereign UK GNSS Along with destinations, suc - first frontier, and also that Earth l OneWeb takes sustainability into cessful commercialisation of LEO imagery is an industry success orbit and calls on the wider industry will depend on a community, story.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Erosion in Arizona and New Mexico By
    Democratic Erosion in Arizona and New Mexico A comparative analysis on the divergence of border states over time. Capstone Thesis with Professor Sperber by: Cristin Espinoza Published March 2018 at the University of Denver 1. Introduction. Whereas former US Supreme Court Chief Justice Brandeis once described US states as laboratories of democracy, recent scholarship on democratic erosion calls for scholars to reconsider the degree to which US states may also serve as laboratories for authoritarian practices (Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018). In this paper, I seek to advance the understanding of democratic erosion. First, I establish empirical variation in the level of democratic erosion across two US southern border states: Arizona and New Mexico. I also demonstrate that although journalistic accounts often emphasize the role of demography and geography as determinants of voter suppression, redistricting, populist rhetoric, and even racial profiling practices in Arizona, the aforementioned factors are more similar than different across Arizona and New Mexico. Instead, I evaluate the hypothesis that long-run historical differences have influenced democratic erosion in these cases in ways previously overlooked. Specifically, I consider whether stronger Native American defense against white settlement in Arizona constituted a critical juncture that led to significantly more exclusive and ethnically charged state-level politics in Arizona than in neighboring New Mexico. To evaluate this hypothesis rigorously, I consider additional, competing hypotheses, including the possibility that rapid growth of Arizona’s older white population in recent decades, or differences in recent immigration flows may have steered the state in a less democratic direction than its neighbor. I find little evidence that these factors can explain what I demonstrate are longer-run political differences across state lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) Putting the Zero in Zero-G
    June 2021 Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) Putting the Zero in Zero-G We are short shares of Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., often described as the only publicly traded space-tourism company. After going public in October 2019 by way of a merger with a “blank check” company, Virgin Galactic has seen its share price and trading volume soar. It’s become a retail darling, with day traders captivated by images of billionaires donning space suits, blasting off from launchpads, and looking down on the blue marble of Earth. But Virgin Galactic’s $250,000+ commercial “spaceflights” – if they ever actually happen, after some 17 years of delays and disasters – will offer only the palest imitations of these experiences. In lieu of pressurized space suits with helmets – unnecessary since so little time will be spent in the upper atmosphere – the company commissioned Under Armour to provide “high-tech pajamas.” In lieu of vertical takeoff, Virgin’s “spaceship” must cling to the underside of a specialized airplane for the first 45,000 feet up, because its rocket motor is too weak to push through the lower atmosphere on its own. In lieu of the blue-marble vista and life in zero-g, Virgin’s so-called astronauts will at best be able to catch a glimpse of the curvature of Earth and a few minutes of weightlessness before plunging back to ground. This isn’t “tourism,” let alone Virgin’s more grandiose term, “exploration”; it’s closer to a souped- up roller coaster, like the “Drop of Doom” ride at Six Flags.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Publications and Presentations 2010-11
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS JULY 1, 2010 – JUNE 30, 2011 Table of Contents Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences………………………………….. Page 3 School of Architecture…………………………………... Page 125 Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences…………………. Page 133 Walton College of Business……………………………... Page 253 College of Education and Health Professions…………… Page 270 College of Engineering…………………………………... Page 301 School of Law……………………………………………. Page 365 University Libraries……………………………………… Page 375 BUMPERS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND LIFE SCIENCES Agricultural Economic and Agribusiness Alviola IV, P. A., and O. Capps, Jr. 2010 “Household Demand Analysis of Organic and Conventional Fluid Milk in the United States Based on the 2004 Nielsen Homescan Panel.” Agribusiness: an International Journal 26(3):369-388. Chang, Hung-Hao and Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr. 2010. “Childhood Obesity and Unhappiness: The Influence of Soft Drinks and Fast Food Consumption.” J Happiness Stud 11:261–275. DOI 10.1007/s10902-009-9139-4 Das, Biswa R., and Daniel V. Rainey. 2010. "Agritourism in the Arkansas Delta Byways: Assessing the Economic Impacts." International Journal of Tourism Research 12(3): 265-280. Dixon, Bruce L., Bruce L. Ahrendsen, Aiko O. Landerito, Sandra J. Hamm, and Diana M. Danforth. 2010. “Determinants of FSA Direct Loan Borrowers’ Financial Improvement and Loan Servicing Actions.” Journal of Agribusiness 28,2 (Fall):131-149. Drichoutis, Andreas C., Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., Panagiotis Lazaridis. 2010. “Do Reference Values Matter? Some Notes and Extensions on ‘‘Income and Happiness Across Europe.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31:479–486. Flanders, Archie and Eric J. Wailes. 2010. “ECONOMICS AND MARKETING: Comparison of ACRE and DCP Programs with Simulation Analysis of Arkansas Delta Cotton and Rotation Crops.” The Journal of Cotton Science 14:26–33.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviated Bios 2021
    SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS ABBREVIATED BIOS April 2021 1 | P a g e SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADELA DE LA TORRE PRESIDENT Term: Ex Officio from June 2018 to present Dr. de la Torre is the ninth permanent president of SDSU and the first woman to serve in that role. She brings over 30 years of service in leadership roles within institutions of higher education, including the California State University system, the University of Arizona and the University of California, Davis. Prior to her appointment as President, she served as the Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs and Campus Diversity at UC-Davis. Dr. de la Torre’s research focuses on Latino community health – an area in which SDSU is a national leader. Dr. de la Torre served as Director for the UC-Davis Center for Transnational Health for fourteen years, as chair of the UC-Davis Chicana/Chicano Studies Department, as director of the Hispanic Center of Excellence in the College of Medicine at the University of Arizona, and as director of the Mexican American Studies and Research Center at the University of Arizona. Dr. de la Torre was a professor at California State University, Long Beach, and at the University of Arizona before joining UC-Davis in 2002, where she became the first Latina to receive the rank of Distinguished Professor. Dr. de la Torre's grandparents immigrated to the Central Valley from Mexico. She grew up in the Bay Area, where her grandmother and mother taught her important cultural traditions – the importance of family, the value of hard work and the power of education.
    [Show full text]
  • Edristi-Navatra-July-2021.Pdf
    Preface Dear readers, we have started edristi English edition as well since August, 2015. We are hopeful that it will help us to connect to the broader audience and amplify our personal bonding with each other. While presenting Day-to-day current affairs, we are very cautious on choosing the right topics to make sure only those get the place which are useful for competitive exams perspective, not to increase unnecessary burden on the readers by putting useless materials. Secondly, we have also provided the reference links to ensure its credibility which is our foremost priority. You can always refer the links to validate its authenticity. We will try to present the current affairs topics as quickly as possible but its authenticity is given higher priority over its turnaround time. Therefore it could happen that we publish the incident one or two days later in the website. Our plan will be to publish our monthly PDF on very first day of every month with making appropriate modifications of day-to-day events. In general, the events happened till 30th day will be given place in the PDFs. The necessity of this is to ensure the contents factual authenticity. Reader’s satisfaction is our utmost priority so requesting you to provide your valuable feedback to us. We will warmly welcome your appreciation/criticism given to us. It will surely show us the right direction to improve the content quality. Hopefully the current affairs PDF (from 1st July to 31st July) will benefit our beloved readers. Current affairs data will be useless if it couldn’t originate any competitive exam questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Lords' Interests
    REGISTER OF LORDS’ INTERESTS _________________ The following Members of the House of Lords have registered relevant interests under the code of conduct: ABERDARE, LORD Category 10: Non-financial interests (a) Director, F.C.M. Limited (recording rights) Category 10: Non-financial interests (c) Trustee, Berlioz Society Trustee, St John Cymru-Wales Trustee, National Library of Wales Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Trustee, Stephen Dodgson Trust (promotes continued awareness/performance of works of composer Stephen Dodgson) Trustee, West Wycombe Charitable Trust ADAMS OF CRAIGIELEA, BARONESS Nil No registrable interests ADDINGTON, LORD Category 1: Directorships Chairman, Microlink PC (UK) Ltd (computing and software) Category 7: Overseas visits Visit to Dublin, 6-7 May 2015, to talk on UK Election at seminar organised by Goodbody and the British Irish Chamber of Commerce who paid for airfares, accommodation and hospitality Category 8: Gifts, benefits and hospitality Gift of two tickets and lunch at Challenge Cup Final as guest of the Rugby League, 30 August 2015 * Gift of tickets for England-Australia game during Rugby World Cup as guest of Rugby Football Union, 3 October 2015 Gift of one ticket to the semi-finals of the Rugby World Cup, 24-25 October 2015, given by Rugby World Cup 2015 and RFU Category 10: Non-financial interests (d) President (formerly Vice President), British Dyslexia Association Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Vice President, UK Sports Association Vice President, Lakenham Hewitt Rugby Club ADEBOWALE,
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Status and Future of Chicano Studies Programs: Are They Academically Sound*
    ED 273 429 RC 015 924 AUTHOR Rochin, Refugio I.; de la Torre, Adela TITLE The Current Status and Future of Chicano Studies Programs: Axe They Academically Sound? PUB DATE Apr 86 NOTE 34p.; Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association for Chicano Studies (14th, El Paso, TH, April 10-12, 1986). PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) -- Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MFO1/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Rank (Professional); *Affirmative Action; *College Programs; Comparative Analysis; Educational Environment; Educational Opportunities; Educational Quality; *Enrollment Trends; *Ethnic Studies; Faculty Integration; Futures (of Society); Higher Education; *Program Content; Program Improvement; School Holding Power; School Surveys IDENTIFIERS *Chicano Studies; Mexican American Studies; *United States (Southwest) ABSTRACT Using survey responses and catalogue descriptions from 38 programs, the paper examines the current status of Chicano studies programs in four-year colleges/universities in the Southwest. Findings indicate many programs evolved from the civil rights legislation of the 1960s to address ethnic minority concerns and to offer curriculum in the humanities and social sciences but currently serve as a means for fulfilling Affirmative Action requirements and developing a community of Chicano scholars. Identified as problems affecting Chicano studies programs are low Chicano student enrollment, relatively poor student retention and completion of college degrees, paucity of Chicano faculty, and a negative environment for Affirmative Action. Most problems identified by Chicano respondents appear to revolve arouad the perception of little support for Affirmative Action. Most Chicano studies programs need and want more Chicano faculty and students oe their campuses. With more faculty present, the possibility of attracting (increasing enrollment) and serving (increasing retention) more Chicano students improves.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Based Rocket Launch
    TMAL02 Expert Conference 2019 Aircraft Based Rocket Launch Abhay Mahesh Hervatte, Anand Ashok Kaushik, Shubham Arvind Tupkar, Swetha Sappe Narasimhamuthy Keywords: rocket, aircraft, virgin, boeing, aerospace. ABSTRACT The most successful launch platforms , the Boe- Rocket launches are risky, expensive and statistically ing NB-52(NASA) and the Boeing 747 (Virgin more likely to fail as compared to a conventional air- Aerospace), have a couple of things in common - a craft take-off. Additionally, a larger amount of energy high aspect wing and high-bypass turbofans - that en- able the aircraft to carry a range of payloads to the is needed, primarily in the lower troposphere, to pro- [2][3] pel the rocket upwards[1]. desired altitudes . It was theorized that if a rocket is launched above the earth’s troposphere, the amount of fuel and sub- sequently the size of the rocket would be reduced by a significant margin. This report aims to explore, and also provide a basic understanding on, the methods that are currently implemented in aircraft based rocket launching systems. 1 History Military conflict is an excellent catalyst for develop- Fig. 1 Pegasus Rocket being launched from a Boeing 747 ment in the aeronautical field. In 1941, a feasibility test was carried out in Germany, to air launch the V1 During the mid-2000’s a new application to the con- using a bomber. It was a crude attempt to increase the cept was envisioned, a low-cost way to insert satel- effectiveness of the V1. The concept never entered the lites into the low Earth orbit (LEO).
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Space Industrial Base 2020 Report
    STATE OF THE SPACE INDUSTRIAL BASE 2020 A Time for Action to Sustain US Economic & Military Leadership in Space Summary Report by: Brigadier General Steven J. Butow, Defense Innovation Unit Dr. Thomas Cooley, Air Force Research Laboratory Colonel Eric Felt, Air Force Research Laboratory Dr. Joel B. Mozer, United States Space Force July 2020 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this report reflect those of the workshop attendees, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the US government, the Department of Defense, the US Air Force, or the US Space Force. Use of NASA photos in this report does not state or imply the endorsement by NASA or by any NASA employee of a commercial product, service, or activity. USSF-DIU-AFRL | July 2020 i ​ ​ ABOUT THE AUTHORS Brigadier General Steven J. Butow, USAF Colonel Eric Felt, USAF Brig. Gen. Butow is the Director of the Space Portfolio at Col. Felt is the Director of the Air Force Research the Defense Innovation Unit. Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate. Dr. Thomas Cooley Dr. Joel B. Mozer Dr. Cooley is the Chief Scientist of the Air Force Research Dr. Mozer is the Chief Scientist at the US Space Force. Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FROM THE EDITORS Dr. David A. Hardy & Peter Garretson The authors wish to express their deep gratitude and appreciation to New Space New Mexico for hosting the State of the Space Industrial Base 2020 Virtual Solutions Workshop; and to all the attendees, especially those from the commercial space sector, who spent valuable time under COVID-19 shelter-in-place restrictions contributing their observations and insights to each of the six working groups.
    [Show full text]