DOCSLIB.ORG

Resilience of Agricultural Systems Against Crises

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Tropentag 2012 International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development Resilience of agricultural systems against crises Book of abstracts Editor: Eric Tielkes Reviewers/scientific committee: Renate Bürger-Arndt, Andreas Bürkert, Claus Peter Czerny, Alexandra zum Felde, Jóska Gerendás, Oliver Hensel, Dirk Hölscher, Christian Hülsebusch, Brigitte Kaufmann, Christoph Kleinn, Ronald Kühne, Christian Lambertz, Björn Niere, Zbynek Polesny, Eva Schlecht, Anthony Whitbread, Meike Wollni Editorial assistance: Mareike Aufderheide, Clemens Voigts Impressum Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detailierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. Die Deutsche Bibliothek — Cataloguing in Publication-Data (CIP) Tropentag 2011, Book of Abstracts Biophysical and Socio-economic Frame Conditions for the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources: International research on food security, natural resource management and rural development, Hamburg. Hrsg.: Eric Tielkes ISBN: 978-3-9801686-7-0 Online-Version: http://www.tropentag.de Satz: LATEX 2ε Verlag: © DITSL GmbH, Witzenhausen, Germany / http://www.ditsl.org German Institute for Agriculture in the Tropics and Subtropics Druck: Print & Mail (PRIMA), Allendeplatz 1, 20146 Hamburg Oktober 2011 - 1. Auflage Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Ohne ausdrückliche Genehmigung der Hrsg. ist es nicht gestattet, das Buch oder Teile daraus auf fotomechanischem Weg (Fotokopie, Mikrokopie) zu vervielfältigen. The authors of the articles are solely responsible for the content of their contribution. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission of the copyright owners. Preface The annual TROPENTAG, the largest European conference of scientists working in Tropical and Subtropical Agricultural and Natural Resource Management, rotates between the universities of Bonn, Göttingen, Hohenheim, Kassel-Witzenhausen, Hamburg, ETH Zurich and the Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague. On-going organisational support for the event is provided by the German Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture (DITSL) in Witzenhausen and the Council for Tropical and Subtropical Research (ATSAF e.V.) in co-operation with the GIZ Ad- visory Service on Agricultural Research for Development (BEAF). Mr. Dirk Niebel, Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) is the patron of TROPENTAG 2012. TROPENTAG provides a unique platform for scientific and personal exchange for a wide spectrum of the science and development community from students to junior and senior scientists and to development experts and funding organisations. This development-oriented community values TROPENTAG as an interdisciplinary scien- tific event with attendees from 80+ countries contributing to the stimulating debate. TROPENTAG 2012 takes place on the central campus of the Georg-August- Universität Göttingen on 19-21 September. It has been jointly organised by the Fac- ulty of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg- August-Universität Göttingen and the Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Uni- versity of Kassel (Witzenhausen). The theme of the 2012 conference is “Resilience of Agricultural Systems Against Crises”. This is a particularly relevant theme in today’s world with most of the 2 bil- lion poorest people who face on-going food insecurity being smallholder farmers liv- ing in tropical environments. Sustainably producing food and fibre in the face of climate change, population growth, urbanisation and social change requires innova- tive and systems based research to help people living in rural and urban areas build resilient and food secure livelihoods. With the current focus of many development initiatives on intensification strategies for favourable environments, research and de- velopment efforts are lacking to support the highly vulnerable communities located in fragile, remote and usually semi-arid to arid regions. It is in these environments 3 that the effects of inadequate system resilience are most acute. This conference will provide the platform for discussing and planning new research and development ini- tiatives. From the many abstracts received, a panel of reviewers selected contributions that present new information on: • How agricultural systems can be made more resilient to cope with crises such as high climate variability, volatile markets, biotic and abiotic stresses. • What do resilient farming systems look like? • Scientific approaches that are practical, innovative, scalable and integrative. • Model approaches that provide insights to system resilience. These aspects will be addressed in TROPENTAG 2012 by several internationally renowned keynote speakers, via 19 oral sessions presenting almost 100 talks and 24 guided poster sessions presenting 360 posters. A special session to commemorate the International Center for Tropical Agriculture’s (CIAT) 45th anniversary is also planned. Our special thanks goes to the Universities of Göttingen and Kassel for providing substantial financial and logistical support, and TROPENTAG’s regular donors whose financial contributions ensure conference costs are kept low. We welcome you to the university town of Göttingen and wish you an enjoyable and rewarding stay The organising committee of the TROPENTAG 2012 Prof. Dr. Anthony Whitbread (Göttingen) Prof. Dr. Andreas Buerkert (Kassel-Witzenhausen) Dr. Esther Fichtler (Göttingen) Dr. Christian Hülsebusch (DITSL - Witzenhausen) Prof. Dr. Christoph Kleinn (Göttingen) Prof. Dr. Eva Schlecht (Kassel-Witzenhausen/Göttingen) Dr. Eric Tielkes (DITSL - Witzenhausen) Dr. Christian Lambertz (Göttingen) Prof. Dr. Dr. Claus-Peter Czerny (Göttingen) Göttingen, September 2012 4 Message Almost one billion people worldwide suffer from hunger. Another billion are mal- nourished. This is an unacceptable situation. By 2050, we will probably have to feed nine billion people while taking care not to overstretch our planet’s ecological capacity. Hunger and malnutrition have many causes. One central cause is undoubtedly the fact that agricultural productivity in most developing countries is too low to give the majority of the rural poor adequate income opportunities or to ensure food security for them. This is the very factor that we need to address. So when I assumed office in 2009, I made rural development and food security a political priority of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) again, considerably in- creasing the Ministry’s financial commitments in the sector. The volume of relevant commitments is now more than 700 million euros a year. This is more than 10 per cent of my Ministry’s total budget. The Tropentag is a renowned international forum for development and agricultural research experts to share information and experience as well as knowledge. Numer- ous organisations and experts from a variety of fields from more than 80 countries are represented. The event provides a good networking opportunity, especially for younger experts. It is intellectual input of this kind that makes a huge difference in whether development policy and development cooperation are successful or not. So it was my pleasure to accept the role of patron for this Tropentag . The three departments that are jointly organising this year’s Tropentag (the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology of Göttingen University and the Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences of Kassel Uni- versity) all look back on a long tradition of research and teaching. Time and again, they have accepted new challenges. And they are leaders when it comes to interdisci- plinary research. This year’s topic, “Resilience of Agricultural Systems against Crises”, is a highly top- ical issue. Small farmers in particular are vulnerable to risks such as drought, floods, erosion, plant disease and pests. But if small farmers’ capacity is enhanced in line with needs, there are many ways in which they can deal effectively with such risks. 5 Development-oriented agricultural research can contribute decisively to enhanced re- silience, for example through the breeding of drought-tolerant plant varieties. For many years now, the BMZ has been supporting development-oriented agricultural research at international agricultural research centers with an approximate 20 million euros per year. In all these projects, partners from German research institutions are part of the effort. We will further increase our efforts to transform the valuable, en- couraging outcomes of international agricultural research in such a way that they can inform agricultural practice in our partner countries. This is especially true for the out- comes of agricultural research with regard to adaptation to climate change. I clearly highlighted this need in the Ten-point Programme for Rural Development and Food Security which I presented in the beginning of this year. We have now launched a Technical Cooperation project to address this issue. I wish the Tropentag every success. I am convinced that its participants’ dedication to research, their capacity for innovation and their creativity will contribute a great deal to the improvement of global food security. Dirk Niebel Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development 6 Contents
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2

    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2

    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium

    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium

    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
  • National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS)

    National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS)

    National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS) HIMALAYAN RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP (PRO FORMA FOR THE ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT) [Reporting Period: from 1st April, 2019 to 31st March, 2020] Kindly fill the NMHS Fellowship Annual Progress Report segregated into the following 7 segments, as applicable to the NMHS Fellowship nature and outcomes. 1. Fellowship Grant Information and Other Details 2. Fellowship Description at Himalayan Research Associates (H-RAs) Level 3. Fellowship Description at Himalayan Junior Research Associates (H-JRFs) Level 4. Fellowship Description at Institutional/ University Level 5. Fellowship Concluding Remarks/ Annual Summary 6. Specific Research Question(s) Addressed with Succinct Answer(s) 7. Any other information Please let us know in case of any query at: [email protected] PRO FORMA NMHS-Fellowship Annual Progress Report (APR) 1. Fellowship Grant Information and Other Details NMHS Fellowship Grant ID: HSF2015-16_I003 Name of the Institution/ University: Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata No. of Himalayan Research/Project Associates: 03 No. of Himalayan Junior Research/Project Fellows: 09 NMHS Fellowship Grant Progress Page 1 2. Fellowship Description at H-RA Level Himalayan Research Associates (H-RAs) H-RAs Profile Description: S. Date of Name of the PI and Name of RA Research Title Qualification No. Joining Designation 1. Dr. Abesh Kumar Sanyal 03.06.2016 Lepidoptera (Insecta) as Dr. Kailash Chandra, Ph.D. Potential Indicator-Taxa for Director Tracking Climate Change in the Indian Himalayan Landscape 2. Dr. Angshuman Raha 03.06.2016 Lepidoptera (Insecta) as Dr. Kailash Chandra, Ph.D. Potential Indicator-Taxa for Director Tracking Climate Change in the Indian Himalayan Landscape 3.
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)

    CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)

    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
  • Butterflies of North America

    Butterflies of North America

    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
  • Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?

    Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?

    Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect.
  • Insect Diversity on Mount Mansfield

    Insect Diversity on Mount Mansfield

    Introduction identified to genus and four to species. The representation of the suborder Cyclorrhapha In 1991 a long term survey program comprised two divisions. Two families were was developed to record the insect present in the division Aschiza with three biodiversity on Mount Mansfield with Syphridae being identified to species and a respect to taxonomic composition and further 18 specimens unidentified. The abundance. Permanent survey traps were division Schizophora was represented by established to compare and contrast insect eight families, including Muscidae, diversity in three forests habitats. Calliphoridae, and Tachinidae. The taxonomic composition of the Two suborders of Hymenoptera are fauna is presented for the Diptera, represented. The suborder Symphyta Hymenoptera, and Coleoptera combined for comprised two sawfly families, Argidae and malaise and waterpan traps over 1991-1992 Tenthredinidae. The homtail family collecting season. The species of carabid Siricidae is represented by the common beetles collected from pitfall traps among pigeon tremex (Tremex calumba). The larger the three survey sites are given for 1991 and suborder Apocrita comprised 10 families 1992 respectively, and the Lepidoptera including a number of ichneumonid species collected from light traps are parasitoids that are not identified to species. tabulated for 1991. Two suborders of Coleoptera are represented. The Adephaga are limited to Methods the Carabidae (ground beetles) with 58 identified species (Table 1b). The remaining Sampling sites were established at beetles belong to the Polyphaga with twenty- 400m elevation (proctor Maple Research five families represented. The family Center) in a sugar maple forest, 600m Staphylinidae (rove beetles) comprise four (Underhill State Park) in a mixed hardwood specimens identified to genus and seven to forest, and 1160m (Mt.
  • Illustration Sources

    Illustration Sources

    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
  • Siloam Springs State Park

    Siloam Springs State Park

    SILOAM SPRINGS STATE PARK ADAMS / BROWN COUNTIES, ILLINOIS AN INSECT SURVEY FOR ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FUNDED BY THE SMALL GAME GRANT FY1999 JUNE, 2000 A report of research by VERNON L. LA GESSE And JAMES R.WIKER Adjunct Research Associates Zoology Department Illinois State Museum Springfield, Illinois 217-525-1410 [email protected] I Siloam Springs State Park, Adams/Brown County, Illinois Insect Survey 1997-2000 Introduction Approximately 2000 species of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) occur in Illinois. These species are important to the ecosystem because of their association with the flora of this area. The larval stages are primary plant consumers, and the adult forms are pollinators. In addition, they are a common food resource for many species of birds, mammals and other arthropods. Many species, especially those restricted by host plant requirements, serve as indirect indicators of habitat quality (LaGesse et al. 1996). With the current interest in land management and maintaining plant and animal diversity, a formal insect survey was conducted . During the growing season of 1997 through 1999, 15 diurnal and 9 nocturnal surveys for Lepidoptera were performed over a three-year period by the senior author. Materials and Methods Prairies (mesic to dry), oak- hickory woodlands, oak barrens stream/creek edges and the lake communities were sampled at Siloam Springs State Park . Insects were sampled by various methods. Sampling included capture and release of species easily identified and preservation of voucher representatives to confirm identification of species . All voucher specimens will be deposited with the author's collection or the Illinois State Museum (ISM), Springfield, Illinois .
  • Appendices, Glossary

    Appendices, Glossary

    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
  • Insects and Mites Associated with Ontario Forests: Classification, Common Names, Main Hosts and Importance

    Insects and Mites Associated with Ontario Forests: Classification, Common Names, Main Hosts and Importance

    cfs-scf.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca Insects and mites associated with Ontario forests: Classification, common names, main hosts and importance. Nystrom, K.L.; Ochoa, I. M. 2006. Information Report GLC-X-7 Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Great Lakes Forestry Centre Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Nystrom, K.L. Insects and mites associated with Ontario forests : classification, common names, main hosts, and importance / K.L. Nystrom and I.M. Ochoa. (Information report, 0832-7122 ; GLC-X-7) Includes abstract in French. Includes index. Previously published 1994. Includes bibliographical references: p. 77 ISBN 0-662-43153-7 ISSN 2562-0738 (online) Cat. no.: Fo123-2/7-2006E 1. Forest insects--Ontario. 2. Plant mites--Ontario. 3. Forest insects--Nomenclature. 4. Plant mites--Nomenclature. I. Ochoa, I.M. II. Great Lakes Forestry Centre III. Title. IV. Series: Information report (Great Lakes Forestry Centre) ; GLC-X-7 SB764 C3 N97 2006 634.9'6709713 C2006-980111-8 Nystrom, K.L. and Ochoa, I.M. 2006. Insects and mites associated with Ontario forests: classification, common names, main hosts, and importance. Nat. Res. Can., Can. For. Ser., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Inf. Rep. GLC-X-7. 98p. ABSTRACT This report was prepared to facilitate the use of scientific and common names of insects and mites dealt with by the forestry community of Ontario and includes most of the species recorded by the Forest Health Unit over the past 60 years. Insects and mites are arranged alphabetically by genus and species. Information provided for each entry includes order, family name, common name, host plant or insect type and a rating of current importance.