DOCSLIB.ORG

Notodontidae & Oenosandridae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notodontidae & Oenosandridae Cornell University Insect Collection Notodontidae Compiled by Jacob A. Gorneau Curated by Jacob A. Gorneau, Annika Salzberg, Anna Espinoza, Joseph Giulian, Leeah Richardson, Kyhl Austin, Milena Blue Spruce Determined species and subspecies: 971 Updated: January 2020 Cornell University Insect Collection Notodontidae: Scranciinae, Platychasmatinae, Pygaerinae, Notodontinae, Cerurinae, Phalerinae, Dudusinae, Hemiceratinae, Heterocampinae, Nystaleinae, Periergosinae, Thaumetopoeinae, Dioptinae, Dicranurinae, incertae sedis Compiled by Jacob A. Gorneau Curated by Jacob A. Gorneau, Annika Salzberg, Anna Espinoza, Joseph Giulian, Leeah Richardson, Kyhl Austin, Milena Blue Spruce Determined species and subspecies: 971 Updated: January 2020 CUIC Notodontidae January 2020 Scranciinae Family Subfamily Tribe Genus (Subgenus) species subspecies (Author Date) Zoogeographic Region Notodontidae Scranciinae Gargetta costigera Walker 1865 ORI Notodontidae Scranciinae Scrancia africana Aurivillius 1904 ETH Notodontidae Scranciinae Scrancia atrifasciata Gaede 1928 ETH Notodontidae Scranciinae Scrancia leucopera Hampton 1910 ETH 1 CUIC Notodontidae January 2020 Platychasmatinae Family Subfamily Tribe Genus (Subgenus) species subspecies (Author Date) Zoogeographic Region Notodontidae Platychasmatinae Sphetta apicalis Walker 1865 ORI 2 CUIC Notodontidae January 2020 Pygaerinae Family Subfamily Tribe Genus (Subgenus) species subspecies (Author Date) Zoogeographic Region Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera albosigma albosigma (Fitch 1856) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera albosigma curtuloides (Erschoff 1870) PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera anachoreta Denis & Schiffermüller 1775 PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera anastomosis anastomosis Linnaeus 1758 PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera anastomosis tristis Fixsen 1887 PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera apicalis apicalis (Walker 1855) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera apicalis ornata (Grote & Robinson 1868) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera brucei (H. Edwards 1885) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera curtula Linnaeus 1758 PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera curtuloides Erschoff 1870 PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera inclusa inclusa (Hübner 1831) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera inclusa jocosa (Edwards 1886) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera inornata (Neumögen 1882) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera pallida (Walker 1855) ORI Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera paraphora (Dyar 1921) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera pigra Hufnagel 1766 PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Clostera strigosa (Grote 1882) NEA Notodontidae Pygaerinae Gonoclostera aurosigna (Hampson 1895) ORI/PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Gonoclostera timoniorum (Bremer 1861) PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Micromelalopha baibarana Matsumura 1929 ORI Notodontidae Pygaerinae Micromelalopha troglodyta (Graeser 1890) PAL Notodontidae Pygaerinae Rosama auritracta (Moore 1865) ORI Notodontidae Pygaerinae Rosama strigosa (Walker 1855) ORI 3 CUIC Notodontidae January 2020 Notodontinae Family Subfamily Tribe Genus (Subgenus) species subspecies (Author Date) Zoogeographic Region Notodontidae Notodontinae Neodrymoniaini Disparia nihonica (Wileman 1911) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Neodrymoniaini Disparia variegata (Wileman 1910) ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Neodrymoniaini Mesophalera sigmata Butler 1877 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Cascera bella Bethune-Baker 1904 AUS Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Cerasana anceps Walker 1862 ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Cnethodonta griscescens Staudinger 1887 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Desmeocraera glauca Gaede 1928 ETH Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia annulata Schaus 1906 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia beccari Schaus -- NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia curvilinea Schaus 1904 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia directa Schaus 1904 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia gaudens Schaus 1906 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia nodicornis Guenée 1852 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia notha Möschler 1883 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia obliqua Walker 1865 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia plateada Schaus 1904 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia raatzi Möschler 1883 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia repandens Schaus 1906 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia rufescens Schaus 1901 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia simplex Walker 1865 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia smerinthina Schaus 1921 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Hapigia smerinthoides Walker 1865 NEO Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Netria viridescens Walker 1855 ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Omichlis griseola Bethune-Baker 1904 AUS Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Oxoia irrorativiridis (Bethune-Baker 1904) AUS Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Stauropus (Benbowia) virescens Moore 1879 ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Stauropus (Stauropus) basalis Moore 1877 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Stauropus (Stauropus) fagi (Linnaeus 1758) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Stauropus (Stauropus) obliterata Wileman and South 1917 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Stauropus (Stauropus) sikkimensis (Moore 1865) ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis bella Bethune-Baker 1904 AUS Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis confusa (Wileman 1910) ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis cyanea (Leech 1888) PAL 4 CUIC Notodontidae January 2020 Notodontinae Family Subfamily Tribe Genus (Subgenus) species subspecies (Author Date) Zoogeographic Region Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis kebeae (Bethune-Baker 1904) AUS Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis pallidifascia centrobrunnea (Matsumura 1927) ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis punctatella (Motschulsky 1860) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis subgeneris (Strand 1916) ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis viridimaculosa Matsumura 1922 ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Stauropini Syntypistis viridipicta Wileman 1910 ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Allodonta plebeja Oberthür 1880 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Allodonta (Hexafrenum) leucodera (Staudinger 1892) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Allodontoides tenebrosa Moore 1866 ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Drymonia dodonaea (Denis & Schiffermüller 1775) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Drymonia dodonides Staudinger 1887 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Drymonia japonica Wileman 1911 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Drymonia melagona (Borkhausen 1790) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Drymonia querna (Denis & Schiffermüller 1775) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Drymonia ruficornis (Hufnagel 1766) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Drymonia velitaris (Hufnagel 1766) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Epidonta brunneomixta Mabille 1897 ETH Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Epidonta lineata (Oberthür 1880) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Euhampsonia cristata (Butler 1877) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Euhampsonia splendida (Oberthür 1881) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Leucodonta bicoloria (Denis & Schiffermueller 1755) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Lophocosma atriplaga Staudinger 1887 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Lophocosma geniculatum Matsumara 1929 ORI Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Lophontosia cuculus Staudinger 1887 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Lophontosia pryeri (Butler 1879) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Microphalera grisea Butler 1885 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Nerice bidentata Walker 1855 NEA Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Nerice bipartita Butler 1885 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Nerice davidi Oberthür 1881 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Nerice hoenei Kiriakoff 1963 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Nerice leechi Staudinger 1892 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Nerice upina Alphéraky 1892 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Norracoides basinotata (Wileman 1910) ORI 5 CUIC Notodontidae January 2020 Notodontinae Family Subfamily Tribe Genus (Subgenus) species subspecies (Author Date) Zoogeographic Region Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta dembowskii Oberthür 1879 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta dromedarius (Linneaus 1767) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta manitou Neumoegen & Dyar 1893 NEA Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta scitipennis Walker 1862 NEA Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta stigmatica Matsumara 1920 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta torva simplaria Graef 1881 NEA Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta torva torva (Hübner 1803) NEA Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta tritophus phoebe (Siebert 1790) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta tritophus tritophus (Denis & Schiffermuller 1775) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Notodonta ziczac ziczac (Linnaeus 1758) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Odontosia carmelita (Esper 1799) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Paradrymonia vittata (Staudinger 1892) PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Phalerodonta manleyi Leech 1888 PAL Notodontidae Notodontinae Notodontini Pheosia buddhista (Püngeler
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • To Us Insectometers, It Is Clear That Insect Decline in Our Costa Rican
    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE To us insectometers, it is clear that insect decline in our Costa Rican tropics is real, so let’sbekindto SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE the survivors Daniel H. Janzena,1 and Winnie Hallwachsa Edited by David L. Wagner, University of Connecticut, and accepted by Editorial Board Member May R. Berenbaum November 11, 2020 (received for review April 6, 2020) We have been field observers of tropical insects on four continents and, since 1978, intense observers of caterpillars, their parasites, and their associates in the 1,260 km2 of dry, cloud, and rain forests of Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica. ACG’s natural ecosystem restoration began with its national park designation in 1971. As human biomonitors, or “insectometers,” we see that ACG’s insect species richness and density have gradually declined since the late 1970s, and more intensely since about 2005. The overarching perturbation is climate change. It has caused increasing ambient tempera- tures for all ecosystems; more erratic seasonal cues; reduced, erratic, and asynchronous rainfall; heated air masses sliding up the volcanoes and burning off the cloud forest; and dwindling biodiversity in all ACG terrestrial ecosystems. What then is the next step as climate change descends on ACG’s many small-scale successes in sustainable biodevelopment? Be kind to the survivors by stimulating and facilitating their owner societies to value them as legitimate members of a green sustainable nation. Encourage national bioliteracy, BioAlfa. climate change | BioAlfa | conservation by rewilding | biodevelopment | insect decline As “insectometers,” also known as human biomoni- eventually focused into Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuana- tors, we have watched the conspicuous ongoing de- caste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica (8–13) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15. Central and Eastern Africa: Overview
    Chapter 15 Chapter 15 CENTRAL AND EASTERN AFRICA: OVERVIEW The region as treated here is comprised mainly of Angola, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo (Brazzaville), Congo (Kinshasa) (formerly Zaire), Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. The wide variety of insects eaten includes at least 163 species, 121 genera, 34 families and 10 orders. Of this group the specific identity is known for 128 species, only the generic identity for another 21, only the family identity of another 12 and only the order identity of one. Gomez et al (1961) estimated that insects furnished 10% of the animal proteins produced annually in Congo (Kinshasa). Yet, in this region, as in others, insect use has been greatly under-reported and under-studied. Until recently, for example, the specific identity was known for fewer than twenty species of insects used in Congo (Kinshasa), but, in a careful study confined only to caterpillars and only to the southern part of the country, Malaisse and Parent (1980) distinguished 35 species of caterpillars used as food. The extent of insect use throughout the region is probably similar to that in Congo (Kinshasa) and Zambia, the best-studied countries. Research is needed. Caterpillars and termites are the most widely marketed insects in the region, but many others are also important from the food standpoint, nutritionally, economically or ecologically. As stated by this author (DeFoliart 1989): "One can't help but wonder what the ecological and nutritional maps of Africa might look like today if more effort had been directed toward developing some of these caterpillar, termite, and other food insect resources." The inclusion of food insects in the Africa-wide Exhibition on Indigenous Food Technologies held in Nairobi, Kenya, in 1995 is indicative of the resurgence of interest in this resource by the scientific community of the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal and Spatial Origin of Gesneriaceae in the New World Inferred from Plastid DNA Sequences
    bs_bs_banner Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 171, 61–79. With 3 figures Temporal and spatial origin of Gesneriaceae in the New World inferred from plastid DNA sequences MATHIEU PERRET1*, ALAIN CHAUTEMS1, ANDRÉA ONOFRE DE ARAUJO2 and NICOLAS SALAMIN3,4 1Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Ch. de l’Impératrice 1, CH-1292 Chambésy, Switzerland 2Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Rua Santa Adélia, 166, Bairro Bangu, Santo André, Brazil 3Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 4Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Received 15 December 2011; revised 3 July 2012; accepted for publication 18 August 2012 Gesneriaceae are represented in the New World (NW) by a major clade (c. 1000 species) currently recognized as subfamily Gesnerioideae. Radiation of this group occurred in all biomes of tropical America and was accompanied by extensive phenotypic and ecological diversification. Here we performed phylogenetic analyses using DNA sequences from three plastid loci to reconstruct the evolutionary history of Gesnerioideae and to investigate its relationship with other lineages of Gesneriaceae and Lamiales. Our molecular data confirm the inclusion of the South Pacific Coronanthereae and the Old World (OW) monotypic genus Titanotrichum in Gesnerioideae and the sister-group relationship of this subfamily to the rest of the OW Gesneriaceae. Calceolariaceae and the NW genera Peltanthera and Sanango appeared successively sister to Gesneriaceae, whereas Cubitanthus, which has been previously assigned to Gesneriaceae, is shown to be related to Linderniaceae. Based on molecular dating and biogeographical reconstruction analyses, we suggest that ancestors of Gesneriaceae originated in South America during the Late Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • What's "Up"? a Critical Loolc at the Basic Terms of Canopy Biology^
    BIOTROPICA 32(4a): 569-596 2000 REVIEW AND VIEWPOINT What's "Up"? A Critical Loolc at the Basic Terms of Canopy Biology^ Mark W. Moffett Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 3101 Valley Life Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The lack of recent critiques about terminology has led to the frequent misuse or confusingly varied use of the words that are more or less specific to the field of terrestrial canopy biology. I provide definitions for ca 170 terms and subterms, with translations into four languages. Rather than limit coverage to tree crowns, I define canopy biology as the study of life within any aboveground parts of all plant communities, temperate and tropical. This broadened perspective enables ecologists to consider the entire range of challenges faced by organisms living in aboveground plant life, from just above the rhizosphere to the outer limits of plant growth into the atmosphere. Further, this redefinition may reduce the potential for anthropocentric biases in interpreting life on trees or other plants; encourage the use of alternative ecosystems for hypotheses that may be difficult to address in treetops; and promote more general conceptual thinking about life on vegetation, most notably the importance of scaling in ecology. Among the salient points in terminology: the concept of "stratification" has been criticized in part because strata have been defined many ways, but a flexible application of the word is central to its utility; the source of nutrients is pivotal in distinguishing
    [Show full text]
  • SPG2: Biodiversity Conservation (July 2006) 1 1.0 an OVERVIEW
    Kent and Medway Structure Plan 2006 mapping out the future Supplementary Planning Guidance SPG2 Biodiversity Conservation July 2006 Strategy and Planning Division/ Environment and Waste Division Environment and Regeneration Directorate Kent County Council Tel: 01622 221609 Email: [email protected] Kent and Medway Structure Plan 2006 Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG2): Biodiversity Conservation Preface i. The purpose of Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) is to supplement the policies and proposals of development plans. It elaborates policies so that they can be better understood and effectively applied. SPG should be clearly cross-referenced to the relevant plan policy or policies which it supplements and should be the subject of consultation during its preparation. In these circumstances SPG may be taken into account as a material consideration in planning decisions. ii. A number of elements of SPG have been produced to supplement certain policies in the Kent and Medway Structure Plan. This SPG supplements the following policies: • Policy EN6: International and National Wildlife Designations • Policy EN7: County and Local Wildlife Designations • Policy EN8: Protecting, Conserving and Enhancing Biodiversity • Policy EN9: Trees, Woodland and Hedgerows iii. This SPG has been prepared by Kent County Council working in partnership with a range of stakeholders drawn from Kent local authorities and other relevant agencies. iv. A draft of this SPG was subject to public consultation alongside public consultation on the deposit draft of the Kent and Medway Structure Plan in late 2003. It has been subsequently revised and updated prior to its adoption. A separate report provides a statement of the consultation undertaken, the representations received and the response to these representations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Fauna of Namibia. I. Seasonal Distribution of Moths of the Koakoland (Mopane) Savanna in Ogongo, Northern Namibia
    FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA 57 (2): 117–129, 2014 PL ISSN 0015-9301 © MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY PAS DOI 10.3161/00159301FF2014.57.2.117 Lepidoptera fauna of Namibia. I. Seasonal distribution of moths of the Koakoland (Mopane) Savanna in Ogongo, northern Namibia Grzegorz KOPIJ Department of Wildlife Management, University of Namibia, Katima Mulilio Campus, Private Bag 1096, Katima Mulilo, Namibia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: During the years 2011–2013, moths were collected in Koakoland (Mopane) Savanna in the Cuvelai Drainage System, Ovamboland, northern Namibia. In total, 77 species from 13 families have been identified. Their seasonal occurrence in this habitat was also investigated, with most species recorded in wet season between September and April, but with clear peak in February and March. The family Noctuidae was by far the most speciose (38 recorded species), followed by Crambidae (8 spp.), Sphingidae (6 spp.) and Arctiidae (4 spp.). All other families were represented by 1–3 species. For each species listed date of collection is given, and data on its global distribution. Key words: Lepidoptera, check-list, biodiversity, distribution, moths, Ovamboland INTRODUCTION According to recent quite precise estimate, there are 15 5181 species, 16 650 genera and 121 families of Lepidoptera worldwide (Pouge 2009). Lepidoptera fauna of Namibia has recently attracted attention of European entomologists. However, thorough surveys were conducted hitherto in a few areas only, such as Brandberg and Hobatere. The northern regions of the country were especially badly neglected. In southern Africa (south of Zambezi and Kunene Rivers) – 8 511 species, 2 368 genera and 89 families were recently catalogued (Vári et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disphragis Notabilis (Schaus) Species-Group in Costa Rica (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysThe 421:Disphragis 21–38 (2014) notabilis (Schaus) species-group in Costa Rica (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae) 21 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.421.7351 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The Disphragis notabilis (Schaus) species-group in Costa Rica (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae) J. Bolling Sullivan1,Michael G. Pogue2 1 200 Craven Street, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 2 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c/o Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, NMNH, MRC-168, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA. Corresponding author: J. Bolling Sullivan ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Schmidt | Received 20 February 2014 | Accepted 15 May 2014 | Published 27 June 2014 http://zoobank.org/4B87F05B-1916-404E-B3E1-ECF514708A88 Citation: Sullivan JB, Pogue MG (2014) TheDisphragis notabilis (Schaus) species-group in Costa Rica (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae). In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths V. ZooKeys 421: 21–38. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.421.7351 Abstract The four described taxa in the Disphragis notabilis (Schaus) species-group are reviewed, including the types and their dissected genitalia. Disphragis hemicera (Schaus), stat. rev., is elevated to species rank, D. normula (Dognin) is retained as a synonym of D. notabilis, D. sobolis Miller is confirmed as distinct from D. hemicera, and D. bifurcata sp. n., is newly described. Both D. hemicera and D. bifurcata occur in Costa Rica. The known ranges of the other species are outlined. Defining characters of each species are presented and a key to species is provided. Unusual variation in the genitalia is noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensory Gene Identification in the Transcriptome of the Ectoparasitoid
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Sensory gene identifcation in the transcriptome of the ectoparasitoid Quadrastichus mendeli Zong‑You Huang, Xiao‑Yun Wang, Wen Lu & Xia‑Lin Zheng* Sensory genes play a key role in the host location of parasitoids. To date, the sensory genes that regulate parasitoids to locate gall‑inducing insects have not been uncovered. An obligate ectoparasitoid, Quadrastichus mendeli Kim & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae), is one of the most important parasitoids of Leptocybe invasa, which is a global gall‑making pest in eucalyptus plantations. Interestingly, Q. mendeli can precisely locate the larva of L. invasa, which induces tumor‑like growth on the eucalyptus leaves and stems. Therefore, Q. mendeli–L. invasa provides an ideal system to study the way that parasitoids use sensory genes in gall‑making pests. In this study, we present the transcriptome of Q. mendeli using high‑throughput sequencing. In total, 31,820 transcripts were obtained and assembled into 26,925 unigenes in Q. mendeli. Then, the major sensory genes were identifed, and phylogenetic analyses were performed with these genes from Q. mendeli and other model insect species. Three chemosensory proteins (CSPs), 10 gustatory receptors (GRs), 21 ionotropic receptors (IRs), 58 odorant binding proteins (OBPs), 30 odorant receptors (ORs) and 2 sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs) were identifed in Q. mendeli by bioinformatics analysis. Our report is the frst to obtain abundant biological information on the transcriptome of Q. mendeli that provided valuable information regarding the molecular basis of Q. mendeli perception, and it may help to understand the host location of parasitoids of gall‑making pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamuli the Newsletter of the International Society of Hymenopterists
    Hamuli The Newsletter of the International Society of Hymenopterists volume 2, issue 1 20 January 2011 In this issue... Treasurer’s report (Brabant) 1 Figging in South Africa (van Noort) 1 Webmaster’s report (Seltmann) 2 Secretary’s report (Deans) 2 Ideas for ISH membership (Sharanowski) 7 New model for JHR (Woolley) 7 Permits and loans (Austin) 8 Recovery from 7th ICH (Melika) 10 Gall wasp jewelry (Talamas) 11 Gregarious Aleiodes (M. Shaw) 12 White whale wasps (Williams) 13 Dr Michael McLeish and MSc student Frances van der Merwe (University Photoeclector (Talamas) 14 of Stellenbosch) with Dr Simon van Noort (Iziko South African Museum), from left to right respectively, at Ithala Game Reserve in front of a South Where the wild things are (S. Shaw) 14 African near endemic fig species, Ficus burtt-davyi. Missing wasps and bees (Barthélémy) 16 Digitization in Finland (Sääksjärvi et al.) 17 Figging in KwaZulu-Natal Hidden rainbows (Hansson & Shetsova) 19 By: Simon van Noort, Iziko Museums of Cape Town Collecting bears (Schwarzfeld) 20 Five stings in a day (Starr) 21 A combined Iziko Museums of Cape Town and Univer- Sarawak Hymenoptera survey (Darling) 22 sity of Stellenbosch field trip was conducted in October Lessons from fieldwork (Mayo) 24 2010 to sample fig wasps for cuticular hydrocarbons. The Vapor coating for SEM (Dal Molin et al.) 27 focus of the sampling area centered on north-eastern South Tropical ichneumonids (Sääksjärvi) 28 Africa. Fig species have a tropical distribution and the HAO update and report (HAO team) 30 highest concentration and diversity of South African fig Slam traps in Belize (Broad) 32 species occurs in Kwazulu-Natal, hence the targeting of Scanning specimen drawers (Deans) 33 this region to maximize return on sampling effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Party on Poplar and Willow Insects and Other Animal Pests
    WORKING PARTY ON POPLAR AND WILLOW INSECTS AND OTHER ANIMAL PESTS 169 170 PRESENT SITUATION OF THE POPULATION OF N. OLIGOSPILUS FOERSTER (=N. DESANTISI SMITH) (HYM.: TENTHREDINIDAE) IN THE TAFI VALLEY, TUCUMAN, ARGENTINA: FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS Mariela Alderete1, Gerardo Liljesthröm Nematus oligospilus Foerster (= N. desantisi Smith), a Holartic species whose larvae feed on leaves of Salix spp., was recorded in Argentina and Chile in the 1980´s. In the delta of the Paraná river (DP) and in the Tafí valley (VT) in Argentina, the sawfly larval populations attained high densities and severe defoliations were observed: in 1991-92 and 1993-94 in DP, and in 1990-91 and 1994-95 in VT. In VT the sawfly larvae have remained at low density since then and trials excluding natural enemies showed that larval survivorship was significantly higher than in the controls. Further, an intensive sampling over five consecutive years allowed us to perform a key-factor analysis, and larval mortality, possibly due to predators (polyphagous Divrachys cavus was the only parasitoid recorded from less than 1% host larvae), was density-dependent and supposed to be capable of regulating the sawfly population. The DP and VT regions have different ecological conditions: while DP has broad and continuous willow plantations and a humid-temperate climate, VT is an elevated valley bordered by mountains with a sub-humid cold climate (rains are concentrated in spring and summer) with small and rather isolated willow forests. Apart from these differences, both regions show very low parasitoidism, outbreaks shortly after being recorded in the area, and no significant differences between outbreak and no-outbreak years with respect to mean and mean maximum temperatures as well as in accumulated rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 34 Number 2 - Fall/Winter 2001 Number 2 - Fall/ Article 3 Winter 2001 October 2001 Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio Roy W. Rings Ohio State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Rings, Roy W. 2001. "Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 34 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol34/iss2/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Rings: Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State 2001 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 9 CHECK LIST OF IDENTIFIED LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED AT MUD LAKE STATE NATURE PRESERVE, WILLIAMS COUNTY, OHIO Roy W, Rings 1 ABSTRACT A total of696 species ofLepidoptera is reported from the Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio. This preserve is only a few miles from both the Indiana and Michigan state borders. The great biodiversity of moths is reflected in the bog, fen, shrub swamp, and marsh communities bor­ dering the lake. A check list of species summarizes identified collections for 1988,1992,1995 and 1996 and includes the Hodges et al (1983) species num­ bers, the scientific name, and the numbers collected by different collecting methods.
    [Show full text]