Dust and Stone: Caucasian Sketches in Lermontov, Mandelstam and Grossman
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Dust and Stone: Caucasian Sketches in Lermontov, Mandelstam and Grossman Daniele Artoni ♦ eSamizdat (XI), pp. - ♦ OU should stop walking barefoot here! beaten by a group of compatriots while trying to “Y You’re not in the North, you’re not in Eu- protect an Armenian woman. Whereas contempo- rope – the Caucasus is dusty”. While I was travel- rary reality is characterised by the anti-Armenian ling in Georgia, a friend of mine from Tbilisi pointed pogroms – which occurred in Azerbaijan in the late out this feature I had not considered before: dust 1980’s – and the narration often evokes the histor- is an element you find everywhere in the Caucasus. ical reality of 1919 – when the Nakhichevan Arme- Alongside the presence of dust all over the place, nians were slaughtered by the Turkish army –, the my eyes were struck by the stone, another compo- oneiric reality of Saday’s dreams is captured by the nent characterising Caucasian sceneries and land- stones of Aylis, his native village in Nakhichevan, scapes. Stony Georgian churches are built on the where “кто-то собрал все высеченные из камня top of stony mountains; revolting snakes hide un- ступеньки и уступы мира и выстроил их сколь- der incandescent stones in the Azerbaijani desert ко хватает глаз в этом самом узком ущелье Ай- of Qobustan, where nomadic pre-historic people лиса”2. Here the main church is called kamen- carved their memories on rocky walls; Armenian naya tserkov’ [stone church], the walls are made churches made of stone dominate rocky valleys, of stone, the streets are stony, and stones are what where people as ancient as stone managed to cut the children in Aylis throw at the doors. khachkar1 out of it. Beyond the title, in the novel stone is revealed My experience as a traveller triggered my inter- both as a primordial element upon which Armenia est in exploring to what extent the vast literary pro- created a land as beautiful as Paradise, and as a duction set in the Caucasus has dealt with two ele- metaphorical state of mind connected to dream and ments characterising this region – dust and stone. coma, which eventually led to death. In particular, this essay focuses on travel literature Coming back to the perception of the Caucasus and aims at investigating how the two abovemen- in travel writing, here I focus on Russian litera- tioned elements are perceived as belonging to a re- ture, which has been affected by the complex rela- ality “other” than everyday life and whether they are tionship between forms of government (the Russian enriched with symbolic value. Empire, the Soviet Union and the Russian Federa- Stone as a characterising element of the Cau- tion) and a land that alternatively was part of them3. casus dominates not only the traveller’s percep- Whereas Soviet criticism read the conquest of the tion, but also the Caucasians’ view of their land, Caucasus both as instance of tsarist colonialism4 as witnessed by indigenous literature. A recent and meaningful example is provided by Daş yuxular- 2 “Someone collected all the steps and benching car- Каменные Сны [Stone Dreams, 2012] published ved in stone in the world and set them forth as far as the eye can see in that narrow canyon of Aylis”, link in the Russian journal Druzhba Narodov, a novel <http://magazines.russ.ru/druzhba/2012/12/aa5.html>. written by the Azerbaijani author Akram Aylisli. 3 The Caucasus was gradually annexed to the Russian Empire in the th The plot rotates around the comatose dreams of 19 century (first under Peter I, then during the so-called Cau- casian War in 1817-64), it was divided in several republics be- the Azerbaijani actor Saday Sadykhly after he was longing to the Soviet Union, some of which became officially au- tonomous – still unofficially under the Russian influence – at the beginning of the Nineties. 1 The typical Armenian cross-stone. 4 See S. Vel’tman, Vostok v khudozhestvennoj literature, eSamizdat 2016 (XI) ♦ La letteratura di viaggio in area slavofona ♦ and, conversely, as an act of liberation from reac- sus is not geographically motivated (the Cauca- tionary forces (such as Shamyl’s Islamic opposi- sus is South to Russia) and affected by the Ori- tion)5, more recent studies after Orientalist theo- ental status of Russia itself (Russia is East to Eu- ries6 tend either to apply Said’s analysis to Impe- rope), the texts I will consider do not display a clear rial Russia7 or to highlight the two main specifici- hegemonic imbalance between a dominating Rus- ties of the Russian situation: on the one hand the sia and a dominated Caucasus12. In the light of Russian Empire must be viewed as a multicultural this, the elements of stone and dust are analysed as organism in which a Russian core interfaces with chthonic components characterising the otherness its varied peripheries, lacking the territorial discon- of this corner of the world so different from Rus- tinuities typical of the European Empires8; on the sia13, but so close to it. In order to unveil how the other hand, Russia is studied as being simultane- stone and the dust in the Caucasus are perceived by ously subject and object of Orientalism, displaying Russian writers and whether these elements are en- both western and eastern features in the discourse riched with symbolic values, I’ve focused my anal- of power and knowledge9. As noted by Ferrari10, a ysis on three pivotal writers, who actually travelled post-colonial reading of the relationships between in the Caucasus and wrote about it – Mikhail Ler- Russia and the Caucasus has become common montov (1814-41), Osip Mandelstam (1891-1938) in post-soviet times in the Slavic studies in En- and Vasily Grossman (1905-64). glish language, but fundamentally absent among Although belonging to different times, in which the Russian scholars11. the relationships between Russia and the Caucasus I will show how the Caucasian “otherness” is pe- were different – when Lermontov visits Georgia, it culiar in its acquaintance with the Russian eye; in is part of the Russian Empire, whereas at the time of addition, given that the status of Oriental Cauca- Mandelstam’s and Grossman’s journeys to Arme- nia, it is part of the Soviet Union – the three authors Moskva, Leningrad 1928; N. Svirin, “Russkaya Kolonial’naya are absorbed by the Caucasus and such fascination literatura”, Literaturny kritik, 1934, 9, pp. 76-79. affects their production. 5 An account of the complex relationshipbetween Russia and the Is- lamic entities in the North Caucasus is provided by M. Bennigsen Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov (1814-1841) trav- Broxup, The North Caucasus Barrier. The Russian Advance elled in the Caucasus twice when he was a child (in Towards the Muslim World, London 1992. 14 6 1820 and 1825) , before serving there in 1837 and A listof studieson RussianOrientalismis providedinV.Tolz, “Ori- 15 entalism, nationalism, and ethnic diversity in late Imperial Russia”, 1840 . The Caucasus became the place where he The Historical Journal, 2005, 48, p. 130. The studies she consid- ers are listed as follows: “Ab imperio: Theory and History of Na- 12 tionalities and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Realm”, 2002 (1), Some Saidian readings of A Hero of Our Time by Lermontov – link <http://abimperio.net>; S. Layton, Russian Literature and one of the works mentioned later – highlight how the novel dis- Empire: Conquest of the Caucasus from Pushkin to Tolstoi, plays a clash between a masculine representation of Russia and its Cambridge 1994; M. Greenleaf, Pushkin and romantic fashion: feminine counterpart, the Caucasus to be seduced. See P.Scotto, fragment, elegy, Orient, irony, Stanford 1994; R. Geraci, Win- “Prisoners of the Caucasus: Ideologies of Imperialism in Lermon- dow on the East, Ithaca 2009; D. Brower, E. Lazzerini, Russia’s tov’s ‘Bela’”, PMLA, 1992, 107, (2), pp. 246-260; S. Layton, Rus- Orient: imperial borderlands and peoples, 1700-1917, Bloom- sian Literature, op. cit., pp. 133-155. However, I claim that ington 1997; M. Bassin, Imperial visions: nationalist imagi- Lermontov’s attitude towards the Caucasus resembles that of a nation and geographical expansion in the Russian Far East, seducing lover rather than a violent conqueror, as suggested, for 1840-1865, Cambridge 1999. instance, by the verse lyublyu ya Kavkaz [I love the Caucasus] 7 See A. Khalid, N. Knight, M. Todorova, “Ex tempore: Orientalism repeated three times in the poem Kavkaz [Caucasus, 1830]. See and Russia”, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian M.Yu. Lermontov, Polnoe sobranie stikhotvorenij, I, Leningrad 1989, p. 98. History, 2000 (I), 4, pp. 691-727. 13 8 See A. Kappeler, Rußland als Vielvölkerreich. Entstehung. One may claim that dust and stone are widely displayed in the li- Geschichte. Zerfall, München 1992. terature connected to the city of Pietersburg and thus cannot be 9 See N. Knight, “Grigor’ev in Orenburg, 1851–1862: Russian Ori- considered as components alien to Russia. However, whereas in entalism in the service of empire?”, Slavic Review, 2000, 59, pp. Pietersburg the presence of dust and stone is caused by human 74-100. activity, which typically subjugates nature by creating an artificial 10 A. Ferrari, Quando il Caucaso incontrò la Russia. Cinque reality, the same elements in the Caucasus are parts of nature itself storie esemplari, Milano 2015, pp. 10-11. and peculiar traits of the Caucasian landscapes. See E. Lo Gatto, 11 Il mito di Pietroburgo, Milano 1960. A remarkable exception is provided by a Saidian analysis of the re- 14 lationships between Russia and the Northern Caucasus in V.O. V.A. Mnujlov, Lermontovskaya entsiklopediya, Moskva 1981, p. 644. Bobronikov, I.L. Babich, Severny Kavkaz v sostave Rossijskoj 15 Imperii, Moskva 2007.