(Translation)

Minutes of the Third Meeting of the Planning and District Facilities Management Committee (2020) of Kwai Tsing District Council

Date： 16 June 2020 Time: 2:30 p.m. – 7:01 p.m. Venue: K&T DO Conference Room

Attendee Time of Arrival Time of Departure (p.m.) (p.m.)

Mr SIN Ho-fai (Chairman) Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr KWOK Tsz-kin (Vice-chairman) Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve Start of Meeting 6:41 Mr CHEUNG Man-lung Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr HON Chun-yin Start of Meeting 3:21 Mr HUI Kei-cheung Start of Meeting 5:47 Miss KWOK Fu-yung Start of Meeting 5:30 Mr LAM Siu-fai Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr LAU Chi-kit Start of Meeting End of Meeting Ms LAU Kwai-mui Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr LEUNG Chi-shing 4:40 End of Meeting Mr LEUNG Kam-wai Start of Meeting 6:29 Ms LEUNG Kar-ming Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr LEUNG Kwok-wah Start of Meeting 6:14 Mr LEUNG Wing-kuen 2:54 5:29 Mr NG Kim-sing Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr SIN Chung-kai, SBS, JP Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr TONG Ho-man Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr TSUI Hiu-kit Start of Meeting 6:47 Mr WONG Bing-kuen Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr WONG Chun-tat Start of Meeting End of Meeting Miss WONG Pit-man Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr WONG Tin-yan Start of Meeting End of Meeting Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan Start of Meeting 6:22

In Attendance Miss LEUNG Ching-shan Mr FUNG Hon-wa, Harris District Leisure Manger (Kwai Tsing), Leisure and Cultural Services Department Ms LEE Oi Wan, Wandy Deputy District Leisure Manager (District Support) Kwai Tsing, Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr LEE Wai-man, Jimmy Senior Librarian (Kwai Tsing), Leisure and Cultural Services Department Ms WONG Fan-ni, Jasmine Senior Manager (New Territories South) Promotion, Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr KWAN Yu Hang, Jason Engineer/24 (West), Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr YIM Wai-Hung, Vincent Administrative Assistant/Lands (District Lands Office, Tsuen Wan and Kwai Tsing), Lands Department Mr CHEUNG Wai-lun Engineer/ New Territories West (Distribution 4),Water Supplies Department Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie Assistant District Officer (Kwai Tsing), Kwai Tsing District Office Mr WU Chi-yin, Victor Senior Inspector of Works (Kwai Tsing), Kwai Tsing District Office Mr CHAN Chi-kong Inspector of Works (Kwai Tsing), Kwai Tsing District Office Ms WONG Lai-kuen, Jenny Senior Executive Officer (District Management), Kwai Tsing District Office Mr CHEUNG Shu Kei, Kay District Secretary, Kwai Tsing District Office Mr CHOW Kai-sing, Thomas Liaison Officer i/c Kwai Chung (C&S), Kwai Tsing District Office Ms LEUNG Pui-shan, Emily Liaison Officer (General 3), Kwai Tsing District Office Miss YUEN Yee-lam, Kathy Executive Officer (District Council) 5, Kwai Tsing (Secretary) District Office

Absent with Apologies Mr CHAN Chi-wing (With prior notice) Mr CHOW Wai-hung, Rayman (Without prior notice) Miss LO Yuen-ting (With prior notice) Responsible Department

Opening Remarks

The Chairman welcomed Members and representatives of government departments to the third meeting of the Planning and District Facilities Management Committee (the Committee) (2020) of Kwai Tsing District Council (K&T DC).

Confirmation of Minutes of the Second Meeting (2020) held on 6 May 2020

2. Mr HUI Kei-cheung moved a motion to confirm the minutes. The motion was seconded by Mr HON Chun-yin and the Committee endorsed the said minutes unanimously.

Discussion Papers

To Improve the Barrier-free Facilities in Kwai Shing Swimming Pool (Proposed by Mr CHOW Wai-hung, Rayman, Mr NG Kim-sing, Mr TONG Ho-man and Mr WONG Bing-kuen) (PDFMC Paper No. 24/D/2020, 24a/D/2020)

3. Mr NG Kim-sing introduced the paper and enquired if the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) would arrange redevelopment, renovation or improvement works for the Kwai Shing Swimming Pool, for example, by introducing heated swimming facilities.

4. Mr WONG Bing-kuen introduced the paper and enquired how the LCSD would improve the stairway connecting the changing rooms and the pools.

5. The Chairman announced that Miss LEUNG Ching-shan would be allowed to put forth her opinions in regard to the aforesaid issue although she was not a Member of PDFMC.

6. Miss LEUNG Ching-shan put forth opinions as follows:

(i) In light of the low utilization rate of parks and soccer pitches near the Kwai Shing Swimming Pool and the insufficient parking spaces in the district, she suggested that the LCSD raise the plot ratio of the swimming pool so as to increase the number of parking spaces available. She also pointed out that the utilization rate and space usage of other old swimming pools 3 Responsible Department had been enhanced after renovation work. Therefore, she recommended the LCSD to take reference at relevant works.

(ii) As the elderly and workers suffering from work injury had to go to swimming pools for spa treatments, there was a high demand on barrier-free facilities.

7. Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan put forth opinions as follows:

(i) As Kwai Shing Swimming Pool was an outdoor facility, the proposal to introduce heated swimming pools was not feasible.

(ii) Facilities at Kwai Shing Swimming Pool were obsolete and the energy efficiency was low. He hoped that the Kwai Tsing District Office (K&TDO) would review the planning for cultural and recreational facilities in the district and coordinate with other relevant departments for redevelopment works.

8. Mr LAM Siu-fai put forth opinions as follows:

(i) As the North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool and the Kwai Shing Swimming Pool were both outdoor facilities, the proposal to provide heated swimming facilities was not feasible. He also pointed out that many residents had to go to Shing Mun Valley Swimming Pool in Tsuen Wan as the pool was equipped with heated swimming facilities.

(ii) There were insufficient parking spaces at North Kwai Chung Tang Shiu Kin Sports Centre, which was not enough to cater for the demand for large-scale sports events. He suggested the government should reevaluate the overall community planning of Kwai Tsing district and the utilization rate of facilities.

9. Ms LEUNG Kar-ming opined that despite the large number of schools in Kwai Shing area, there were not enough public libraries and study rooms in the Kwai Chung district. She hoped that government departments would consider increasing the number of recreational and cultural facilities in the district.

10. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie, Assistant District Officer (Kwai Tsing) of K&TDO gave a consolidated response as follows: 4 Responsible Department

(i) Before the last term of the District Council (DC) ended, DC Members of last term had proposed to review the ageing facilities in the district, such as the Osman Ramju Sadick Memorial Sports Centre. K&TDO had been collaborating with the Planning Department, LCSD, Lands Department and Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) to step up urban renewal works. The biggest obstacle during the redevelopment process, however, was to achieve a seamless transition of public services. K&TDO hoped to fulfill the needs of residents in the district and ensure that public services would not be affected, while achieving better use of space

(ii) K&TDO would continue to study the redevelopment plans of the district with relevant departments and would consult the committees concerned once the preliminary plans for redevelopment were laid out.

11. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris, District Leisure Manger (Kwai Tsing) of LCSD gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) LCSD had been paying close attention to the ageing facilities in the district. For instance, the Kwai Shing Swimming Pool, North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool and Osman Ramju Sadick Memorial Sports Centre had been in service for over 40 years. However, redevelopment took time. LCSD would take note of Members’ opinions concerning the redevelopment of Kwai Shing Swimming Pool and the provision of additional recreational facilities and parking spaces.

(ii) LCSD did not have redevelopment plans for facilities in the district at the moment, but they would note Members’ suggestions on redeveloping the Kwai Shing Swimming Pool and North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool.

(iii) LCSD had provided barrier-free facilities at Kwai Shing Swimming Pool in accordance with the design requirements laid down in the latest edition of “Design Manual: Barrier Free Access 2008” (“Design Manual”). For example, barrier-free passageways and tactile guide paths were provided for disabled persons, the elderly, pregnant women and families. LCSD had provided appropriate barrier-free facilities in a technically feasible

5 Responsible Department manner at Kwai Shing Swimming Pool and North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool, which were both built before 2008.

(iv) To safeguard public health, swimming pool users had to pass through the water curtain before entering the pool area from the changing rooms. As there were walls on the both sides of the stairway connecting the changing rooms and the pool area of Kwai Shing Swimming Pool, it was deemed not expandable after comprehensive examination by LCSD and the Architectural Services Department (ArchSD) due to structural limitations. Therefore, accessible lifting platforms could not be provided.

(v) It was suggested that wheelchair users should go to other swimming pools in the district, such as Tsing Yi Swimming Pool and Tsing Yi Southwest Swimming Pool.

12. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He enquired if LCSD could provide the plan of Kwai Shing Swimming Pool to further illustrate the structural limitations of the stairway from the changing rooms to the pool area of the swimming pool. He also enquired if the redevelopment of swimming pool would be the only option if improvements were to be made on the above facility.

(ii) The Morse Park Swimming Pool and Kwun Tong Swimming Pool had been opened to the public since 1970 and 1971 respectively. There were heated swimming facilities and additional barrier-free access facilities after redevelopment works of the two pools. As Kwai Shing Swimming Pool had been in service since 1975, he enquired about the criteria of initiating redevelopment projects and whether there was a schedule for the redevelopment of swimming pools.

13. Mr SIN Chung-kai put forth opinions as follows:

(i) He hoped the LCSD could renovate and upgrade the obsolete recreational facilities in a timely manner.

(ii) It was regrettable that Kwai Shing Swimming Pool was closed in winter. He hoped that residents could enjoy access to the swimming pool all year round. 6 Responsible Department

14. Mr LAM Siu-fai put forth opinions as follows:

(i) Although North Kwai Chung Tang Shiu Kin Sports Centre covered a large area, its space was not sufficiently utilized.

(ii) There was a lack of fitness facilities at Wo Yi Hop Road Sports Ground, and the lane lines of the running tracks had also faded in colour.

(iii) Improvements on facilities could not be made without redevelopment works for the Kwai Shing Swimming Pool and North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool. Although electric wheelchair users could enter the above swimming pools, they might not be able to enjoy the swimming facilities within.

(iv) He believed that it would be difficult to achieve a seamless transition of public services. While he understood that the redevelopment works might cause inconvenience, the works should not be shelved due to the inability to achieve seamless transition of services if benefits could be brought about to the residents of the district.

15. Mr WONG Bing-kuen put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He enquired about the number of swimming facilities at Kwai Shing Swimming Pool that could not fulfil the requirements set out in the Design Manual of the Housing Department.

(ii) He enquired about the criteria of initiating redevelopment projects and whether Kwai Shing Swimming Pool had met the relevant criteria.

(iii) He asked if LCSD would provide temporary facilities at Kwai Shing Swimming Pool, such as toilets and changing rooms for disabled persons.

16. Mr NG Kim-sing put forth opinions as follows:

(i) He agreed that it would be difficult to achieve a seamless transition of public services once redevelopment works were initiated. Residents in the district would not be able to access Kwai Shing Swimming Pool in the

7 Responsible Department coming few years. However, they could enjoy more comprehensive facilities upon the completion of works.

(ii) It had been 45 years since the opening of Kwai Shing Swimming Pool and the facilities had become obsolete. He understood that redevelopment works took time and hoped LCSD would initiate the redevelopment works for the above-mentioned facilities as soon as possible.

17. Miss LEUNG Ching-shan put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) The time required for the redevelopment of Kwai Shing Swimming Pool.

(ii) Factors of consideration in initiating redevelopment works.

18. The Chairman put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) The depth of Tsing Yi Southwest Swimming Pool was only 1.2 m, which was inadequate.

(ii) The high utilization rate of heated swimming pools during winter reflected the high demand of residents in the district. However, Kwai Shing Swimming Pool was short of both barrier-free access and heated swimming facilities. He enquired why LCSD had not launch relevant redevelopment plans.

19. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) Apart from the facilities mentioned by Members, K&TDO also noticed the problems concerning North Kwai Chung Market. As redevelopment took time, she was worried that it would arouse antipathy among residents as they could not purchase daily necessities from the market in the coming few years. Therefore, she hoped to strive and achieve seamless transition of services.

(ii) The Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (“Planning Standards”) prescribed the general government standards on the size, location and site requirements of community facilities based on the demography and other factors concerned. K&TDO would continue to evaluate the types and number of facilities in the district and was unable to 8 Responsible Department provide information on the time and cost needed for redevelopment at the moment.

(iii) There was relatively few vacant land in Kwai Tsing District. Therefore, K&TDO would actively search for suitable land and explore the possibilities on the arrangements for redevelopment projects. If the relevant departments had laid down the preliminary development direction, they would consult Members in this regard.

20. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) All recreational facilities in Kwai Tsing District complied with the design requirements set out in the Design Manual. The Design Manual also stipulated that there were exemptions on circumstances where barrier-free facilities could not be provided due to the structural limitations of buildings.

(ii) Except for the inability to install accessible lifting platforms at the stairway connecting the changing rooms and the pool area, Kwai Shing Swimming Pool had been equipped with all feasible barrier-free facilities in accordance with the requirements of the Design Manual, including barrier-free access from the swimming pool atrium to toilets and changing rooms, ramps at the entrance, tactile guide paths, barrier-free access to toilets and changing rooms, and barrier-free inquiry / service counters at the atrium, as well as Braille and tactile floor plans and Visual Advisory System for disabled persons.

(iii) There were quite a large number of old swimming pools in Hong Kong. LCSD could not provide information on the number of swimming pools which did not fully fulfill the requirements of the Design Manual at the moment but would provide such figures later.

(iv) The North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool, Osman Ramju Sadick Memorial Sports Centre and Wo Yi Hop Road Sports Ground had been opened for more than 40 years. LCSD had to prioritize redevelopment projects and consider the arrangements in detail. To avoid hindering the services provided, LCSD did not have redevelopment plans for Kwai Shing Swimming Pool at the moment. However, they would actively consider Members’ view.. 9 Responsible Department

(v) According to the Planning Standards, the current standards and guidelines on the provision of swimming facilities was one swimming pool complex per 287,000 population in urban areas, new towns and rural townships. With the population of around 500,000 in Kwai Tsing district, it should be equipped with at least two swimming pool complexes according to the Planning Standards. At present, there were four swimming pool complexes in the district and one of which was equipped with heated swimming facilities and thus had met the minimum requirements specified in the Planning Standards.

(vi) In addition to the factors mentioned above, the LCSD would take into consideration the supply of land and explore the possibilities of redevelopment for all facilities in the district that had been in place for over 40 years.

21. Mr WONG Tin-yan put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) The four existing swimming venues in Kwai Tsing District had exceeded the minimum requirements stipulated in the Planning Standards and were sufficient in meeting the needs of residents. In view of this, he enquired about the reason behind the insistence of K&TDO and LCSD on achieving a seamless transition of services.

(ii) As there would not be a sudden increase in land supply, he enquired if K&TDO would look for suitable land for redevelopment plans and why the works could not be initiated immediately.

22. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren pointed out that as the renovation of swimming pools took time, a seamless transition of services should not be the primary consideration.

23. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) With reference to the experience of other districts, residents expressed a certain extent of antipathy towards the unavailability of facilities in the district due to redevelopment projects. K&TDO hoped to devise a more detailed plan for Members and residents. Members would also be consulted if K&TDO laid down the preliminary proposal.

10 Responsible Department (ii) Kwai Shing Swimming Pool was a relatively large-scale swimming facility in the district. In case of in situ relocation of the facility, residents might have to go to other swimming pool complexes in the district for a period of time. She was worried that other complexes would be overloaded by the crowd. In light of this, she believed that it would be a more ideal option to seek out another piece of land to build a smaller swimming pool complex, so that a seamless transition of services could be achieved.

(iii) To promote the “single site, multiple use” development mode of the government and make good use of limited land resources, it was necessary for K&TDO to negotiate the planning and use of land with other government departments, in order to provide more facilities that satisfied the community’s demand on public services.

24. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) There were certain differences among different districts. For instance, there were insufficient swimming pools, a lack of heated swimming facilities or relatively obsolete swimming facilities in other districts. LCSD would consider expediting the redevelopment of swimming pools in those districts. However, some of the swimming pools in Kwai Tsing district had already been equipped with heated swimming facilities and the number of swimming pools was also relatively sufficient. Therefore, there was no urgent need of redevelopment.

(ii) LCSD was aware that many facilities in the district were relatively decrepit yet there was no schedule for redevelopment plans at the moment. However, they had noted Members’ suggestions and would actively consider renovating all relatively obsolete facilities in the district.

25. Mr NG Kim-sing expressed understanding towards the fact that it would take time for the departments to conduct research and arrange redevelopment. He hoped that the departments concerned would be committed to carrying out related works as soon as possible.

26. The Chairman received the following extempore motion as follows:

Extempore Motion: “Planning and District Facilities Management Committee

11 Responsible Department of the Kwai Tsing District Council demanded the immediate commencement of the redevelopment works of Kwai Shing and North Kwai Chung Swimming Pools.” (Proposed by Mr NG Kim-sing and Mr LAM Siu-fai and seconded by Ms LAU Kwai-mui and Mr TONG Ho-man)

27. The Chairman put the above extempore motion to vote for acceptance. Members unanimously accepted the above extempore motion for discussion.

28. The Chairman put the above extempore motion to the vote. Members unanimously endorsed the extempore motion.

(Post-meeting notes: The Secretariat sent LCSD’s written reply to Members on 28 July 2020. Please refer to PDFMC Circulation Paper No. 24/ 2020 for details.)

Arrangement of Earmarked Allocations from the Home Affairs Department for Specific Purposes under the District Minor Works Programme (Proposed by the Kwai Tsing District Office) (PDFMC Paper No. 25/D/2020)

29. Ms LEUNG Pui-shan, Emily, Liaison Officer (General 3) of the District Office introduced the paper.

30. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) The total allocation for the 18 DCs to implement District Minor Works (DMW) projects in 2020-21 was $370,620,000. He enquired about the amounted allocated to Kwai Tsing district.

(ii) The Home Affairs Department (HAD) Headquarters had reserved HK$4,200,000 as the central fund in the past three financial years. He enquired if HAD Headquarters could provide reports on the actual expenditure items of the fund.

31. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) HAD Headquarters had reserved HK$4,200,000 as the central fund in the past three financial years. He enquired about the actual expenditure items

12 Responsible Department of the fund, the amount involved, and how HAD Headquarters would handle the remaining fund.

(ii) He asked if HAD Headquarters would pay the contract consultant by project or in a lump sum.

32. Ms LEUNG Pui-shan, Emily gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The central fund reserved by HAD Headquarters involved consultancy fees and resident site staff expenses paid by Kwai Tsing district, which was $790,800 in 2017/18 financial year; $303,400 in 2018/19 financial year, and $58,200 in 2019/20 financial year.

(ii) HAD Headquarters had reserved $4,200,000 as the central fund in the last financial year, while the actual expenditure was $4,040,000. HAD Headquarters Works Section paid for the excavation permits for DMW projects on behalf of each district and arranged contract vehicles for staff members of HAD Headquarters Works Section to attend functions related to minor works in various districts, such as meetings, site visits and inspections.

(iii) The unspent balance of the funding of the previous financial year was $160,000, which would be returned to the shared pool of funds of the 18 DCs, for the DCs in need.

33. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The unspent balance of the central fund included expenditures that the Headquarters Works Section paid for the excavation permits for DMW projects on behalf of each district, as well as expenses of arranging contract vehicles for staff members of the Headquarters Works Section to attend functions such as inspections.

(ii) Contract consultants had to be appointed through open tender from the approved list of the Architectural and Associated Consultants Selection Board. HAD Headquarters had been actively introducing larger consultancy companies and would meet regularly with the LCSD and K&TDO to review the performance of consultants to enhance competition and improve service quality. 13 Responsible Department

(iii) There were quite a number of technically challenging DMW in Kwai Tsing district which required careful evaluation of slope stability. Therefore, K&TDO hoped to appoint consultants which were more experienced in geotechnical engineering.

(iv) DMW projects in the district which involved a higher degree of complexity, such as the rain shelter in Lai King, had been discussed and endorsed earlier at the meeting of the DC or the Committee, so that Members could monitor its progress.

34. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) He further enquired whether HAD Headquarters would pay the contract consultant by project or in a lump sum. In case of a lump sum payment, he wanted to know the amount of the consultant fees.

(ii) The actual expenditure of the central fund reserved by HAD Headquarters was $4,040,000 in the last financial year. He asked if the remaining $160,000 would be carried forward to the next financial year for related purposes.

35. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) The total allocation for the 18 DCs to implement DMW projects in 2020-21 was $370,620,000, of which $20,000,000 was the lump sum payment of consultant fees and resident site staff expenses by HAD Headquarters. He enquired about the amount of remaining funds allocated to Kwai Tsing district.

(ii) He enquired if K&TDO could provide the actual expenditure items and the expenses of each item of the central fund reserved by HAD Headquarters in the last financial year after the meeting.

36. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) HAD Headquarters paid consultant fees to contract consultants by project.

14 Responsible Department (ii) The fund allocated to the Kwai Tsing District this financial year was $18,620,000. The expenditure items included the funding applications for new DMW proposed by K&TDO, LCSD, ArchSD, Electrical and Mechanical Services Department (EMSD) and Kwai Tsing DC Members.

(iii) The unspent balance would not be carried forward to the next financial year. The unspent balance from the previous financial year would be returned to the shared pool of funds of the 18 DCs for DCs in need.

(iv) The actual expenditure items of the central fund reserved by HAD Headquarters in the previous financial year would be provided after the meeting.

(Post-meeting note: K&TDO indicated that the actual expenditure of the central fund reserved by HAD Headquarters was $3,570,000 in 2018/19 financial year; $4,040,000 in 2019/20 financial year. The actual expenditure items of both years included the expenditures that HAD Headquarters Works Section paid for the excavation permits for DMW projects on behalf of each district and the expenses of arranging contract vehicles for staff members of HAD Headquarters Works Section to attend functions related to minor works in various districts, such as meetings, site visits and inspections.)

37. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren enquired if HAD Headquarters would pay the consultancy fees to term consultants by project, or would pay a lump sum for a certain number of projects.

38. Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve pointed out that Kwai Tsing district was only allocated with around $18,000,000 in the current financial year. However, the project cost of “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre”, “Improvement Works to Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Rooms at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre” and “Refurbishment Works of Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets; Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Room at Kwai Chung Sports Ground” (the “Kwai Tsing District Recreational Facilities Upgrading Project”) listed in the funding application submitted by the LCSD had exceeded $15,000,000. He enquired if the unspent balance was only $3,000,000 for other DMW projects in Kwai Tsing district for the current financial year.

15 Responsible Department 39. The Chairman responded that the cost of“Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” would be paid in installments. The estimated expenditure in the current financial year was $0, in 2021/22 financial year, it would be $7,850,000, and in 2022/23 financial year 2022/23, it would be 3,280,000.

40. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) Although Kwai Tsing District was allocated with a funding of $18,620,000 this financial year, K&TDO would not only undertake projects with costs amounting to $18,620,000. They would also arrange phased payments for projects with high costs.

(ii) HAD Headquarters would pay contract consultants in phases according to individual project progress and evaluate their performance on a quarterly basis.

41. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren pointed out that the consultancy fees were paid by HAD Headquarters. He enquired if each DC hired the same contract consultant, as it might imply a large sum of consultancy fees.

42. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded that each 18 DC hired a fixed contract consultant every year. 18 DC would not carry out high-cost DMW projects every year. Where feasible, the project design would also be simplified to minimize the cost incurred.

43. The Chairman hoped that K&TDO could provide the costs of new minor works in the district and the actual expenditure items for DMW proposed by Kwai Tsing DC Members in the last financial year.

(Post-meeting note: K&TDO indicated that the project costs of proposed new district works projects proposed by Kwai Tsing DC Members in the current financial year could not be provided as the project had not been initiated and site investigation works had not been completed. As for the actual expenditure items of DMW in Kwai Tsing district in the previous financial year, please refer to PDFMC Paper No. 32/I/2020 and PDFMC Paper No. 33/I/2020.)

Funding Proposals on District Minor Works to Be Carried out by Government Departments

16 Responsible Department (Proposed by the Kwai Tsing District Leisure Services Office) (PDFMC Paper No. 26/D/2020)

44. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris introduced the paper.

45. Mr NG Kim-sing put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) He enquired about the time of completion of “Refurbishment Works of Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets; Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Room at Kwai Chung Sports Ground”.

(ii) He asked if LCSD planned to carry out other maintenance or renovation works at Kwai Chung Sports Ground.

(iii) He wanted to know if the “Kwai Tsing District Recreational Facilities Upgrading Project” would be carried out simultaneously or one by one.

46. Mr TONG Ho-man welcomed “Refurbishment Works of Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets; Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Room at Kwai Chung Sports Ground”, but was worried that LCSD would neglect the conditions of other facilities. They had pointed out during the introduction of paper that the condition of other facilities at Kwai Chung Sports Ground was acceptable, yet many residents and venue users reported that the running tracks was in disrepair. Therefore, he asked if LCSD could consider initiating other maintenance works.

47. Mr HUI Kei-cheung put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) Many residents reported that the sanitary conditions of men’s and ladies’ toilets and changing rooms in Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre were not satisfactory. Therefore, he supported the improvement works at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre. However, he was worried that the above project might cause inconvenience to disabled person in using the toilets.

(ii) The dividing panels of the shower booths at the venue were prone to damage. He enquired if LCSD could purchase more durable materials for improvement.

48. Mr WONG Bing-kuen put forth enquiries and opinions as follows:

17 Responsible Department (i) The showering facilities at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre had insufficient water pressure or water temperature. He enquired if the improvement works of LCSD would include the above items.

(ii) As the exhaust outlet of the showering booths at the venue was directly facing the pavement, he hoped that the improvement works of LCSD could include adjustment of the exhaust outlet.

(iii) Taking reference at the past installation of air-conditioning systems in the Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre, he believed that residents would also be very concerned about “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre”, especially the heat emission, noise nuisance and impacts on the view induced. He reminded LCSD to pay attention to the demands of residents and respond to their concerns in a timely manner.

49. Mr LEUNG Wing-kuen put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He was a regular user of the Kwai Chung Sports Ground and opined that venue users expected to be cooled down after using the showering facilities. Therefore, he expressed regret over the fact that LCSD had not considered installing air-conditioning systems in the changing rooms at Kwai Chung Sports Ground. He asked LCSD if they did not consider the relevant project because the relevant project was technically unfeasible, or because most of the resources were invested in “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” in Tsing Yi.

(ii) The men’s and ladies’ toilets at Kwai Chung Sports Ground had been renovated for several times, yet the outcomes were not lasting. The ceiling of the toilets started to peel off after 2 to 3 years while leakage problems also started to emerge at the spectator stands. He requested the LCSD to follow up on facility problems at their roots.

50. Mr LAM Siu-fai put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He had no objections towards the “Kwai Tsing District Recreational Facilities Upgrading Project”.

18 Responsible Department (ii) The lane lines of running tracks at Wo Yi Hop Road Sports Ground had faded and had been peeled off. He opined that the past maintenance works undertaken by LCSD only amounted to patchwork and enquired when LCSD would carry out patchy fixes to improve to above issue and whether thorough improvement works would be arranged.

51. Mr LAU Chi-kit put forth opinions as follows:

(i) He agreed to the necessity of carrying out the “Kwai Tsing District Recreational Facilities Upgrading Project”.

(ii) The project cost for “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” amounted to over $11,000,000, which was extremely expensive. He pointed out that the installation of air-conditioning system in Lai Kok Community Hall only costed $1,910,000; the cost of related works at Lai Chi Kok Community Hall was only $1,800,000; that of the Sai Ying Pun Community Complex Community Hall was merely $1,840,000, while that of general school halls was only about $500,000. In comparison, “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” alone costed $4,000,000. While he understood that the structure of Tsing Yi Estate was relatively complex and the roof alone could hardly support the weight of the air-conditioning unit because of its low load-bearing capacity. Additional reinforcement works might have to be done in lieu, but the project cost was too high when compared to other related projects.

(iii) With reference to PDFMC Paper No. 37/D/2018, K&TDO had replaced the air-conditioning system of the hall at Tai Wo Hau Estate Community Centre. He enquired about the cost of the related project and requested K&TDO or the Secretariat to state in detail the project costs in the papers or in the minutes.

52. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded that the funding application for “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” would have to be endorsed by the Committee. However, since the facilities at community halls were administered by the ArchSD, the replacement of air-conditioning system at Tai Wo Hau Estate Community Centre did not require funding approval of the Committee. K&TDO would report to Members every time when community halls had to be closed due to the replacement of facilities such as air-conditioning systems and 19 Responsible Department lifts. Therefore, K&TDO only reported a temporary closure of Tai Wo Hau Estate Community Centre in that meeting and thus the relevant discussion was short.

53. Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve put forth opinions as follows:

(i) He expressed support towards the “Kwai Tsing District Recreational Facilities Upgrading Project”.

(ii) As shown in the PowerPoint, the conditions of facilities in the ladies’ toilets were also unsatisfactory. He enquired why LCSD only arranged for full renovation of men’s toilets and changing rooms, but not ladies’ toilets and changing rooms.

54. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth enquiries and opinions as follows:

(i) He expressed support towards the “Kwai Tsing District Recreational Facilities Upgrading Project”.

(ii) He indicated that he and the Chairman had been following up on the installation of air-conditioning systems at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre for a long time. He asked if LCSD would consider redeveloping the Sports Centre. He pointed out that although “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” costed over $11,000,000, which was relatively expensive, many residents reflected that the venue was particularly unventilated during summer and LCSD seemingly did not have redevelopment plans for the Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre. Therefore, he supported the above project.

(iii) He enquired about the department responsible for the maintenance costs of the air-conditioning systems at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre.

(iv) According to the estimated project plan, all of the facilities at the Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre would be temporarily closed for 5 months so that the works could be carried out. Seeing the continuous delays of reopening date of Tsing Yi Sports Ground, he hoped that LCSD would start the preparatory work as soon as possible to ensure the work progress of Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre.

20 Responsible Department (v) He wanted to know whether the rooftop of the Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre could support the weight of the air-conditioning unit and whether reinforcement works had to be done. He requested LCSD to provide further explanation in respect of the two matters.

(vi) He enquired if the fund available for DMW in Kwai Tsing district in the coming financial year would be reduced by about $7,000,000 in case the funding application was approved for the installation of air-conditioning system for “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre”. He also wanted to know if the number of DMW projects had to be reduced accordingly.

55. Miss WONG Pit-man put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) She had received complaints from residents that it was unbearable to engage in sports activities on the indoor courts at the Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre because of the lack of air-conditioning system. Therefore, she enquired about the utilization rate of the Centre.

(ii) LCSD had set aside the idea of providing additional air-conditioning system in the past due to the low load-bearing capacity of the rooftop at the venue. Therefore, she believed the aforementioned works would be welcomed by residents in the district.

(iii) She enquired if the project cost of $12,000,000 was considered high and requested further explanations from LCSD.

56. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He asked if LCSD could apply for other funding other than DMW Funds to pay for costs of “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre”, as well as the application procedures and duration.

(ii) He enquired if the above works would result in the reduction of DMW projects in the coming financial year and whether LCSD planned to initiate other works in the next financial year.

21 Responsible Department (iii) He wanted to know if “Improvement Works to Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Rooms at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre” would be carried out simultaneously or by phases, as well as whether LCSD would provide temporary changing rooms and lockers. He was concerned that if the works were carried out simultaneously, venue users might have to use the toilets for disabled persons, which might result in the overloading of facilities. In view of this, he recommended that the works be carried out in phases.

(iv) He enquired if LCSD would provide temporary changing rooms and lockers and increase the number of showering booths when the renovation works for the men’s and ladies’ toilets and changing rooms at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre were in progress.

57. Mr WONG Tin-yan put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He pointed out that the government often neglected the views of venue users and DC Members were not as familiar with the venue as local personalities. With the high utilization rate of Kwai Chung Sports Ground, he suggested that LCSD collect opinions from venue users, such as relevant organizations, running clubs and schools before the commencement of the works.

(ii) The number of lockers at Kwai Chung Sports Ground was always under supply. He enquired if LCSD could increase the number of lockers provided.

(iii) He asked if it was suitable for the Kwai Chung Sports Ground to install energy-saving faciltities.

(iv) He had done site visits at the Kwai Chung Sports Ground and found out that due to the high utilization of the venue, the facilities were in disrepair. Therefore, he hoped LCSD could pay more attention to the issue.

(v) He asked if LCSD could provide the costs for wall finishing works and the replacement of more durable materials for Members’ consideration and comparison.

58. Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan put forth opinions and enquiries as follows: 22 Responsible Department

(i) The cost for the installation of air-conditioning system for the whole of the venue and the replacement of some of the air-conditioning equipment at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre was over $10,000,000, which occupied a large proportion of DMW Funds. He believed that the works should be funded by the government and asked if LCSD could consider applying for other funding other than DMW Funds in order to pay for the works expenditures.

(ii) He said that Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre was in need of renovation. He enquired if LCSD would upgrade the design of lockers or keep the current design and only replace the lockers with new ones. He hoped the LCSD would further elaborate on the durability and safety of current locker materials.

(iii) He had reflected to LCSD that the ceiling for the changing rooms and toilets at Kwai Chung Sports Ground was too low, which might result in the accumulation of moisture and lead to the wear and tear of facilities. He opined that full renovation work should also be carried out for ladies’ toilets and changing rooms.

(iv) Lockers at Kwai Chung Sports Ground was prone to damage and insufficient in numbers, which might lead to safety concerns. He asked if LCSD could increase the number of lockers and enhance their security.

59. The Chairman put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He supported the “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre”. However, he had reservations towards the project cost. He enquired if the project cost could be shared across different financial years.

(ii) He was concerned that the completion of the above works would be delayed continuously just as it was for the works of Tsing Yi Sports Ground. He wanted to know if LCSD had punishment mechanisms for contractors to prevent cost overruns caused by project delays.

60. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

23 Responsible Department (i) DMW Funds allocated to Kwai Tsing district every financial year was around $18,000,000 to $20,000,000. K&TDO would ask ArchSD and LCSD about their project plans for the financial year at the start of each financial year. LCSD would propose large-scale projects every or every two years, but such projects were not common.

(ii) K&TDO would collect statistics on the project expenditures that had not been paid in the previous financial year and control and monitor the total expenditure of all DMW projects to ensure that all projects could be carried out smoothly. At present, DMW Funds were in a healthy condition.

61. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) “Refurbishment Works of Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets; Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Room at Kwai Chung Sports Ground” would be carried out in phases. LCSD would arrange renovation works in the order of the men’s toilet, men’s toilet and changing room, ladies’ toilet and ladies’ toilet and changing room. The works would last for four months and the above facilities had to be temporarily closed for two months respectively.

(ii) Due to the low utilization rate of the ladies’ toilet, the wear and tear of the facilities was not as serious as that in the men’s toilet. After the evaluation of the actual situation, the LCSD believed that there was no need at the moment for full renovation of the ladies’ toilets and changing rooms.

(iii) LCSD had paid close attention to the opinions of venue users and had maintained close contact with relevant organisations. In addition, on-site staff would reflect the conditions of facilities to LCSD. LCSD noticed that there was a need for renovation for facilities at Kwai Chung Sports Ground. Apart from toilets and toilets and changing rooms, running tracks and lockers were also in disrepair. LCSD would arrange other related works as appropriate.

(iv) Renovation works of running tracks were relatively large in scale. LCSD and ArchSD were discussing the plan to initiate the resurfacing works of the running track at sports ground in the district. At present, LCSD was 24 Responsible Department carrying out resurfacing works at Tsing Yi Sports Ground and other improvement works on field facilities. They hoped that the resurfacing works of running tracks at Kwai Chung Sports Ground and Wo Yi Hop Road Sports Ground could commence next year and at a later time respectively.

(v) The delay of completion date for the resurfacing works of running tracks at Tsing Yi Sports Ground and the improvement works of other field facilities was because qualified running track technicians could not arrive at Hong Kong on time due to the pandemic and the entry restrictions for non-Hong Kong residents. The arrival of running track surfacing materials was also delayed due to overseas transportation restrictions. Therefore, related works could not be carried out. There were few technical personnel with relevant professional qualifications, and there were no such technicians in Hong Kong. After the completion of line marking of the running tracks, it would still require international certification before international events could be held. PDFMC Paper No. 28/I/2020 had set out the progress of the above-mentioned works, and LCSD would further explain the related issues later.

(vi) LCSD would consider reserving suitable places for the provision of additional lockers if it was technically feasible.

(vii) The installation of energy-saving devices, such as solar panels, at Kwai Chung Sports Ground might not be appropriate as the panels would reflect light and cause nuisance to nearby residents.

(viii) The renovation works of the men’s and ladies’ toilets and changing rooms at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre would be carried out in phases. LCSD would arrange renovation works in the order of men’s toilet and changing room, ladies’ toilet and changing room, and accessible toilet. LCSD would negotiate with ArchSD to minimize the impacts on disabled persons. They would also opt for better dividing panels for showering booths to reduce the rate of deterioration of facilities.

(ix) LCSD hoped that the addition of pressure tanks could alleviate the problem of insufficient water pressure at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre. They would also follow up on the problem of exhaust outlets with ArchSD. 25 Responsible Department

(x) LCSD would follow up on the maintenance of running tracks at Kwai Chung Sports Ground with ArchSD.

(xi) The estimated cost of “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” was provided by ArchSD. ArchSD stated that additional air-conditioning system and ductwork were required as the venue was not previously equipped with an air-conditioning system, which might affect the architectural structure and would be different from average replacement works of air-conditioning systems. As a result, a higher project cost would be incurred. In addition, in regard to the rooftop structure of the venue, it was also necessary to replace the air-conditioning system in the gym room and multi-purpose activity room that had been in use for over 25 years. ArchSD pointed out that the relocation of air-conditioning units would produce a great deal of noise and affect the view. Therefore, they recommended the relocation of all air-conditioning units in regard to all ductwork systems. The air-conditioning systems of the gym room and multi-purpose room would also have to be replaced to ensure that the waterproof layer at the rooftop would not be affected.

(xii) LCSD had conducted research on the technical and funding aspects of the works for a long period of time. They had also attempted to explore other sources of funding. However, they could not find suitable funding sources at the moment. Therefore, they applied for DMW Funds with a view to launch related works as soon as possible.

(xiii) LCSD had no plans for redeveloping and renovating Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre at the moment. The year-round utilization rate of the arena at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre was 75%, which was similar to that of other arenas at general sports centres. For instance, the year-round utilization rate of the arena at Cheung Fat Sports Centre was 77%, while that of the arena at North Kwai Chung Tang Shiu Kin Sports Centre was 76%. The highest utilization rate of arenas at sports centres of other districts was only approximately 89%.

(xiv) To cater for the needs of venue users, LCSD would provide additional air-conditioning facilities if technically feasible and believed that the public could benefit from the works. 26 Responsible Department

(xv) LCSD would report to Members later the detailed arrangements for the above-mentioned project.

62. The Chairman put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) He wanted to know if LCSD had punishment mechanisms for contractors in case of project delay.

(ii) He enquired if LCSD could share the cost of “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” across each financial year.

63. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren asked which department would take over the maintenance expenses of the air-conditioning systems at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre after 2023.

64. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai asked if temporary changing rooms and lockers would be provided during the renovation works at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre and Kwai Chung Sports Ground.

65. Mr NG Kim-sing enquired if LCSD planned to carry out other maintenance or renovation works at Kwai Chung Sports Ground.

66. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) Temporary changing rooms would be provided during the renovation works at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre. If possible, temporary lockers would also be arranged.

(ii) There were relatively few sheltered areas at Kwai Chung Sports Ground. With the venue limitations, temporary changing rooms would not be provided during the renovation works. However, temporary lockers could be arranged if possible.

(iii) LCSD would start the resurfacing works of running tracks at Kwai Chung Sports Ground with the approval from ArchSD. Other maintenance works would also commence simultaneously if possible.

27 Responsible Department (iv) “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” would span over three financial years. Preliminary works included funding application and the preparation of overall project design, which would not incur any actual expenditures in the current financial year. LCSD were also not required to pay relevant expenses in advance. Therefore, the estimated project expenditure for the current year was $0. To meet the operational needs, LCSD activities would normally end at mid-March or late March every year. LCSD would arrange new events and training courses after 1st April. Therefore, the project would commence after 1st April, 2021.

(v) LCSD had to consult ArchSD on their punishment mechanisms for contractors in case of project delays.

(vi) LCSD would bear the maintenance responsibility for the air-conditioning systems at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre.

67. Mr NG Kim-sing said that as Kwai Chung Sports Ground had been in service for over 40 years, facilities started to age and frequent maintenance was needed. He enquired if LCSD would carry out redevelopment or full renovation works.

68. Mr TONG Ho-man pointed out that a number of facilities at Kwai Chung Sports Ground had been in disrepair. He hoped that the LCSD would carry out redevelopment or full renovation works to arrange maintenance for all obsolete facilities.

69. Mr LAU Chi-kit put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) LCSD mentioned that the average utilization rate for Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre was 75% and the annual number of users was around 200,000. In other words, the daily number of uses of the above venue was 500. He enquired how LCSD came out with such statistics.

(ii) LCSD mentioned that they would only arrange renovation works for 20% of the facilities at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre. He understood that the facilities of the above venues were obsolete and reinforcement works might have to be done, but it should not lead to such a high project cost. He requested that LCSD to provide further explanations on the technical difficulties encountered by ArchSD and EMSD. 28 Responsible Department

70. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) LCSD mentioned that the proposal to install additional air-conditioning systems for the above venue was set aside due to loading limit of the building structure of Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre. He enquired how LCSD overcame such technical barriers and remarked that they could provide supplementary information after the meeting if they could not respond to the technical problems of the installation works at the moment.

(ii) He asked if the LCSD would provide gender neutral toilets and changing rooms at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre and Kwai Chung Sports Ground as many transgender individuals expressed doubts towards using female and male toilets. As some parks under LCSD had already provided gender neutral toilets, he hoped that LCSD would spare space to offer gender neutral toilets and changing rooms at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre and Kwai Chung Sports Ground for the use of sexual minorities.

71. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He enquired if LCSD had full renovation plans for Kwai Chung Sports Ground and the schedule for partial renovation works for the venue.

(ii) LCSD mentioned that temporary lockers would not be provided at Kwai Chung Sports Ground as there were fewer sheltered areas at the venue. He pointed out that metal cages were also available for the storage of personal items during the construction works at MacPherson Playground in Mong Kok.

(iii) He requested that LCSD provide temporary changing rooms at Kwai Chung Sports Ground.

72. Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) LCSD mentioned that the renovation works for changing rooms at Kwai Chung Sports Ground would commence at a later time this year. He asked if LCSD had plans to carry out renovation works of running tracks alongside with the renovation of changing rooms, so as to minimize the impacts on venue users. 29 Responsible Department

(ii) The low ceiling at Kwai Chung Sports Ground might result in the accumulation of moisture. He hoped that LCSD would increase the number of exhaust fans and replace the current ones with those with stronger ventilation capacity.

(iii) He wanted to know if the lockers had to be placed inside the changing rooms. As there were no CCTVs in the changing rooms, he had doubts over the security of lockers. He enquired if the LCSD could place lockers outside the changing rooms or use containers as lockers.

73. The Chairman said that the estimated project expenditure in the next financial year exceeded $7,000,000 for “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre”. He also believed that the resurfacing works of the running tracks at Kwai Chung Sports Ground would be costly. Therefore, he asked if LCSD would put forward other large-scale projects in the next financial year.

74. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) currently had no major works projects that needed to apply for DMW Funds in the next financial year.

(ii) The track refurbishment works at Kwai Chung Sports Ground and the track refurbishment works at Tsing Yi Sports Ground did not have to apply for DMW Funds.

(iii) LCSD would temporarily not implement an overall reconstruction project at Kwai Chung Sports Ground. LCSD continued to carry out turf maintenance work at the sites, and would later refurbish the tracks and other field facilities of Kwai Chung Sports Ground like the refurbishment works at Tsing Yi Sports Ground. They would also discuss with ArchSD whether there was a need to refurbish other facilities.

(iv) The scale of “Refurbishment Works of Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets; Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Room at Kwai Chung Sports Ground” was relatively small. In order not to delay the progress of the works, they would not be carried out together with the track refurbishment works.

30 Responsible Department (v) LCSD would actively consider adding temporary lockers at Kwai Chung Sports Ground.

(vi) LCSD had noticed the humidity of facilities under the stands at Kwai Chung Sports Ground. LCSD would discuss with ArchSD to strengthen the ventilation system, hoping to further improve the above situation.

(vii) LCSD only carried out refurbishment works at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre and Kwai Chung Sports Ground, and the refurbishment works did not involve the addition of facilities. It was understood that unisex toilets were already available at newly-built venues.

(viii) The booking session of multi-purpose activity rooms and fitness rooms at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre. There were quite a lot of people using the facilities, and the number of users at weekends was even higher. The utilisation rate of the arena was calculated by the Department based on the number of rentable sessions and the actual number of rented sessions.

(ix) The main expenditure items for “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” included the arena, the entrance hall-cum -booking office on the ground floor, the multi-purpose activity room, the fitness room, all toilets and changing rooms, all passages and corridors, the budget for building services with an extra-low voltage system, plus the budget for construction works. The building services included an air-conditioning system, an air duct system, the deployment of lighting, a fire-fighting system and electrical installations. The construction works included the walls and ceiling installations of the building.

(x) The budget for building services for the arena was $4,390,000, of which included the arrangement of elevated items, a ventilation system, and pipes; and the budget for construction works was $1,221,000. The budget for building services for the entrance hall-cum-booking office on the ground floor was $1,110,000; and the budget for construction works was $446,000. The budget for building services for the fitness room was $1,520,000, the budget for building services for the multi-purpose activity room was $840,000, and the total budget for construction works for the fitness room and multi-purpose activity room was $160,000. The budgets of the project were provided by the ArchSD. Since the entire project 31 Responsible Department involved multiple expenditure items, and it was not that a single item of the project was expensive, LCSD believed that the relevant budgets were reasonable figures.

75. The Chairman put“Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” in Annex 2 of the Paper to the vote by open ballot.

76. Mr LAM Siu-fai asked if one item of the works was disapproved, whether LCSD could submit a project plan at the next meeting, and whether the completion date would be delayed, which might affect the public.

77. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded that if a project item was disapproved, LCSD had to modify the project plan. The time required for modification depended on the number and scale of the items to be revised requested by the Committee. LCSD might not be able to submit the relevant project plan at the next meeting, nor might it be able to start the tender process as scheduled, which might affect the cost and progress of the project.

78. Mr NG Kim-sing asked if two project items were disapproved, whether it would affect the progress of the other project item.

79. Mr FUNG Hon-wa, Harris responded by stating that LCSD would carry out items of the project separately, and the disapproval of one project item would not affect the progress of another project item.

80. Mr LAM Siu-fai asked whether the relevant funding was sufficient if LCSD increased the project items at Kwai Chung Sports Ground according to the recommendations of Members.

81. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded that depending on the number of newly added project items, LCSD had to discuss with ArchSD to estimate the project cost. If the project cost exceeded $3,000,000, LCSD had to submit relevant documents to the Finance Committee (FC) of the Legislative Council (LegCo) to apply for funding.

82. The results were as follows:

For: 21 votes (Mr TSUI Hiu-kit, Miss KWOK Fu-yung, Ms LEUNG Kar-ming, Mr CHEUNG Man-lung, Mr WONG Tin-yan, Mr 32 Responsible Department LEUNG Kam-wai, Mr WONG Chun-tat, Miss WONG Pit-man, Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren, Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve, Mr LEUNG Chi-shing, Mr LAU Chi-kit, Mr SIN Chung-kai, SBS, JP, Ms LAU Kwai-mui, Mr LAM Siu-fai, Mr WONG Bing-kuen, Mr HUI Kei-cheung, Mr TONG Ho-man, Mr NG Kim-sing, Mr KWOK Tsz-kin, and Mr SIN Ho-fai (Chairman)) Against: 0 vote Abstention: 1 vote (Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan)

Members approved the construction proposal and funding applications listed in Annex 2 of the Paper.

83. The Chairman put “Improvement Works to Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Rooms at Tai Wo Hau Sports Centre” in Annex 3 of the Paper to the vote by open ballot.

84. The results were as follows:

For: 22 votes (Mr TSUI Hiu-kit, Miss KWOK Fu-yung, Ms LEUNG Kar-ming, Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan, Mr CHEUNG Man-lung, Mr WONG Tin-yan, Mr LEUNG Kam-wai, Mr WONG Chun-tat, Miss WONG Pit-man, Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren, Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve, Mr LEUNG Chi-shing, Mr LAU Chi-kit, Mr SIN Chung-kai, SBS, JP, Ms LAU Kwai-mui, Mr LAM Siu-fai, Mr WONG Bing-kuen, Mr HUI Kei-cheung, Mr TONG Ho-man, Mr NG Kim-sing, Mr KWOK Tsz-kin, and Mr SIN Ho-fai (Chairman)) Against: 0 vote Abstention: 0 vote

Members approved the construction proposal and funding applications listed in Annex 3 of the Paper.

85. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren stated that although he supported the above proposal, he requested LCSD to install unisex facilities at original and newly built venues.

33 Responsible Department 86. The Chairman put“Refurbishment Works of Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets; Ladies’ and Men’s Toilets and Changing Room at Kwai Chung Sports Ground” in Annex 4 of the Paper to the vote by open ballot.

87. The results were as follows:

For: 23 votes (Mr TSUI Hiu-kit, Miss KWOK Fu-yung, Ms LEUNG Kar-ming, Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan, Mr CHEUNG Man-lung, Mr WONG Tin-yan, Mr LEUNG Kam-wai, Mr WONG Chun-tat, Miss WONG Pit-man, Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren, Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve, Mr LEUNG Chi-shing, Mr LAU Chi-kit, Mr SIN Chung-kai, SBS, JP, Ms LAU Kwai-mui, Mr LAM Siu-fai, Mr WONG Bing-kuen, Mr LEUNG Kwok-wah, Mr HUI Kei-cheung, Mr TONG Ho-man, Mr NG Kim-sing, Mr KWOK Tsz-kin, and Mr SIN Ho-fai (Chairman)) Against: 0 vote Abstention: 0 vote

Members approved the construction proposal and funding applications listed in Annex 4 of the Paper.

Report Item

Progress of Retrofitting Lift at Tai Wo Hau Estate Community Centre (PDFMC Paper No. 27/R/2020)

88. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie introduced the Paper.

89. Mr HUI Kei-cheung put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) How long it would take to modify the plot ratio and when the project would be completed.

(ii) Whether K&TDO could set out the views of stakeholders in details in a table or in a list.

90. Mr WONG Bing-kuen put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

34 Responsible Department (i) He asked what the enquiries raised by Gaw Capital Partners (GCP) were about.

(ii) He asked about the progress of the funding application for the project.

(iii) He learnt that K&TDO had discussed with the tenants and conducted on-site inspections with them. However, he indicated that the principal of Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui (H.K.S.K.H.) Saint Nichola’s Nursery School had expressed the difficulty to express his opinions in details to K&TDO in a short time. The principal of the school pointed out that the flyover had to connect to the school building, which would affect the structure of the school building. During the period of works, it would also cause noise and air pollution. Except for the short-term closure of the school during summer vacation, the school was open all year round and adopted a day school system. He was worried about the impact of the works on the school. He also pointed out that Lok Chi Association had also expressed concern about the impact of the captioned project. In response to the relaxation of the “Prohibition on Group Gathering” measures, he suggested that K&TDO arrange meetings to consult relevant tenants and DC members of the district in details.

91. Mr LAM Siu-fai believed that residents could benefit from the captioned project. Although the retrofitting works would inevitably produce noise, he did not want K&TDO to shelve the project. He suggested that K&TDO provide full explanations to relevant tenants and minimise the impact on the tenants as much as possible.

92. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He thought that the captioned project had made a lot of progress.

(ii) He asked whether K&TDO would be responsible for the maintenance of the works.

(iii) He asked whether the design of the works had been modified according to the enquiries raised by GCP.

(iv) He asked whether K&TDO could provide the opinions of different stakeholders and the corresponding answers from K&TDO.

35 Responsible Department (v) He believed that the project would have a great impact on H.K.S.K.H. Saint Nichola’s Nursery School. He suggested that a longer meeting should be arranged to discuss the process and design of the works with the relevant tenants to reduce the resistance encountered during the implementation of the works.

93. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) Land lease modification work had now been started for the captioned project. K&TDO was now carrying out lobby work tenants and coordinating with the ArchSD to carry out relevant preliminary work simultaneously.

(ii) K&TDO needed time to consolidate the opinions of the tenants and was still considering how to make minor changes to the design of the works. K&TDO had previously planned to build a lift at the location of the skywell without crossing the car park but found that it was difficult to implement the above design even if the building structure was reinforced. If K&TDO had to carry out any modification works at the corridor, they also needed to conduct careful planning and seek the professional advice of ArchSD.

(iii) The enquiries raised by GCP included whether K&TDO, the ArchSD, or the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA) should be responsible for the maintenance of the external wall of the lift tower and whether K&TDO or the Electrical and Mechanical Services Department (EMSD) should be responsible for the maintenance of the lift.

(iv) ArchSD had noted the relevant departments were applying for land lease modification to the Lands Department (LandsD) for the captioned project. They hoped to apply for funding for the works as soon as possible to appoint a consulting company to conduct detailed designs of the project.

(v) There were no noise or air pollution problems at this stage. However, K&TDO had discussed with ArchSD to take appropriate precautions to reduce the impact on tenants and community halls during the retrofitting works. For example, piling works could be carried out during non-peak hours as far as possible.

36 Responsible Department (vi) K&TDO hoped to consolidate the opinions of the tenants and make adequate preparations before arranging a meeting to discuss with the tenants. They also hoped that Members could assist in lobbying the residents. If they had any difficulties, they could reflect to K&TDO.

94. Mr HUI Kei-cheung put forth opinions as follows:

(i) He appreciated the coordination work between K&TDO and relevant departments. But he hoped that K&TDO would provide more information such as project timetables and construction schedules for Members to lobby with the residents.

(ii) He understood that K&TDO hoped to prepare more information before arranging meetings and lobbying with the tenants, but he believed that more communication with tenants at this stage would also help them understand the progress of the project works.

95. Mr LEUNG Kwok-wah put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) The estimated project cost.

(ii) Whether GCP needed to pay part of the expenses of the works or they did not need to pay any expenses.

(iii) Whether the stakeholders needed to pay part of the expenses of the works.

96. Mr WONG Bing-kuen put forth opinions as follows:

(i) The main concerns of Gaw Capital Partners were whether they needed to pay part of the expenses of the works and whether they had to be responsible for the construction and maintenance of the lift.

(ii) He believed that although the tenants had doubts, they still looked forward to the convenience brought by the completion of the lift. He believed that there was insufficient communication between K&TDO and the tenants, otherwise, the tenants would have supported the project. He suggested that K&TDO convene a meeting as soon as possible and invite him, the relevant tenants and other Members to attend the meeting.

37 Responsible Department 97. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) The opinions of the stakeholders were very important. He understood that K&TDO needed time to consolidate their opinions, but he hoped that they could give Members a preliminary understanding of their opinions.

(ii) He suggested that K&TDO conduct the first round of meetings with tenants to understand their concerns and opinions before making a consolidated reply.

(iii) He asked how long the procedure of applying for land lease modification would take.

98. Mr WONG Yun-tat, Ivan put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) Whether the HA and GCP were responsible for submitting land lease modification applications.

(ii) The procedure and time required to apply for land lease modification.

(iii) Whether the expenses of the works were fully borne by K&TDO, and other departments or institutions did not need to pay any expenses.

99. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) LandsD stated that land lease modification had to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Since the captioned project involved the modification of the gross floor area, which was a major change, LandsD would take time for approval. The target set by K&TDO was to complete the above procedure within 2 to 3 months.

(ii) K&TDO could not provide the actual cost of the works for the time being, but the budget cost of the works would be less than $30,000,000, and all of the expenses would be borne by the government. GCP did not have to pay any expenses for the project works or its maintenance.

(iii) After the detailed design of the project was completed, K&TDO would provide the design to GCP for their reference. The works would be carried out only after obtaining their consent. 38 Responsible Department

(iv) K&TDO hoped that the captioned lift would be put into service from 2024 to 2025. They also hoped that DC Members could assist in lobbying with the residents.

(v) She hoped that a meeting would be arranged to discuss with the tenants as soon as possible. But she believed that more information was needed for K&TDO to discuss with the tenants so as to show their sincerity.

(vi) Most tenants did not express their opinions on the captioned project to K&TDO in written form. When more tenants submitted their written comments, K&TDO would consolidate the opinions of the tenants and provide them to Members for reference.

Information Papers

Report on the Management of Recreational, Sports and Leisure Facilities in Kwai Tsing District by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (PDFMC Paper No. 28/I/2020)

100. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris introduced the Paper.

101. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) LCSD mentioned that the approved track marking technicians who was responsible for the track resurfacing and the improvement works of other field facilities at Tsing Yi Sports Ground were affected by the entry restriction policy for non-Hong Kong residents due to the pandemic, and were unable to arrive at Hong Kong as scheduled. He asked why LCSD believed that the relevant personnel’s visas would be approved.

(ii) He had received complaints from residents about mosquito and midge infestations at Tsing Yi Promenade and Tsing Yi Park and asked LCSD to step up its anti-mosquito work.

102. Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve asked whether LCSD had implemented the “Inclusive Park for Pets” scheme at other parks to cater for the needs of residents.

39 Responsible Department 103. Mr LAU Chi-kit put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) He asked from which country LCSD’s approved track marking technicians was and whether there was relevant technical personnel in Hong Kong, and requested LCSD to further illustrate the professional qualification requirements.

(ii) LCSD mentioned that the approved artificial turf laying technicians responsible for the artificial turf resurfacing works of the 11-a-side artificial turf soccer pitch at Tsing Yi Northeast Park were affected by the entry restriction policy for non-Hong Kong residents due to the pandemic, and were unable to arrive at Hong Kong as scheduled. He asked whether LCSD could ensure that the relevant works would be completed in the third quarter of 2020.

(iii) LCSD mentioned that there were no recreational and sports activities in April and May, and 260 activities were cancelled due to the impact of the pandemic, and the unused activity funding was about $820,000. Now that the limit to the number of people for indoor activities had been relaxed under the “Prohibition on Group Gathering” measure, he asked whether recreational and sports activities had been fully resumed and whether the above-mentioned unused activity funding would be used to organise recreational and sports activities from June to August.

(iv) He requested LCSD to follow up on the problem of stagnant water at Nga Ying Chau Garden.

(v) LCSD planted about 22 000 shrubs for environmental greening from March to April. The shrubs were concentrated at some parks and roadsides, including flower beds on Kwai Chung Road. However, that location was a major trunk road, and trees withered easily, which would accumulate waste. He enquired how LCSD would maintain the shrubs there and reduce the problem of the accumulation of waste.

104. Ms LAU Kwai-mui put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) LCSD mentioned arranging an outsourced service contractor to regularly inspect flower beds to prevent mosquito and rodent infestations. She asked how often the contractor had conducted inspections. 40 Responsible Department

(ii) There were serious mosquito and rodent infestations at Shek Yam Road Rest Garden, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 2, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 3, and Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 4. She had received complaints from residents that more than a dozen rodents were moving around on the flower beds at the above-mentioned parks. She had personally witnessed rodents appearing on the flower beds of the above-mentioned parks. She requested LCSD to review the number of times of checking the flower beds and provide statistics on mosquito infestation.

105. Mr LAM Siu-fai put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) The pitches at Shek Pai Street Park had been closed. Many residents were strolling along the pitches, but the surface of the pavements there were rugged and even sinking, the exposed tree roots might also cause pedestrians stumble. He requested LCSD to take follow-up actions on it.

(ii) The rodent infestations at Shek Yam Road Rest Garden, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 2, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 3, and Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 4 were serious. He indicated that he could show relevant videos to LCSD as proof. He opined that when many elderly conducted gambling activities at the above-mentioned parks, they might dispose of their lunch boxes everywhere, and vegetable stalls often disposed of vegetables in flower beds, which heightened the rodent infestations. He was concerned that rodents might enter the homes of nearby residents, so he requested LCSD hired outsourced workers to conduct anti-rodent works and block the rodent holes to halt rodent infestations.

106. Mr WONG Chun-tat said that the “Inclusive Park for Pets” had been implemented for a long time at Tai Wo Hau Road Playground. As the scheme was working well, he asked whether LCSD would consider implementing the “Inclusive Park for Pets” scheme at more parks, such as Tsing Yi Promenade, because the keeping of pets was allowed in nearby housing estates. He suggested that the “Inclusive Park for Pets” scheme could be tried out at Tsing Yi Promenade.

107. Mr LEUNG Kwok-wah put forth opinions and enquiries as follows: 41 Responsible Department

(i) Damages were found at the basketball court at Shek Pai Street Park. He requested LCSD to carry out maintenance works.

(ii) He requested LCSD to step up its anti-mosquito work and enquired about the progress of the installation works of solar mosquito traps.

108. Mr KWOK Tsz-kin said that the mosquito and rodent infestations at Tsing Hung Road Playground had not improved, which was believed to be related to the idle site of LandsD opposite to Rambler Crest. He request LandsD to take follow-up actions and asked LCSD to report the mosquito and rodent black spots in the district to Members.

109. Mr CHEUNG Man-lung asked if LCSD planned to implement the “Inclusive Park for Pets” scheme at large parks, for example, the proposed Kwai Chung Park was still in the design stage. He enquired whether LCSD would consider implementing the above-mentioned scheme at the proposed Kwai Chung Park.

110. The Chairman said that the track resurfacing and the improvement works of other field facilities at Tsing Yi Sports Ground were originally scheduled to be completed in mid-May, and were postponed to the end of June, and were now further postponed to the third quarter. He pointed out that residents had been looking forward to the reopening of Tsing Yi Sports Ground for a long time, but LCSD was still laying track materials. He believed that the project would still take a long time to complete and requested LCSD to set a definite completion date.

111. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The visas of the approved artificial turf laying technicians responsible for the artificial turf resurfacing works of the 11-a-side artificial turf soccer pitch at Tsing Yi Northeast Park had been approved. The relevant personnel would arrive in Hong Kong on 19 June and would commence the works after 14 days of compulsory quarantine. Given that, LCSD believed that the visas of the approved track marking technicians responsible for the track resurfacing and the improvement works of other field facilities at Tsing Yi Sports Ground would also be approved.

(ii) The tartan tracks at Tsing Yi Sports Ground must be marked by professionals to meet the track requirements of the World Athletics Federation. The approved track marking technicians hired by the 42 Responsible Department contractor engaged by ArchSD were from Portugal and Canada, and there were no relevant technicians in Hong Kong for the time being. If the relevant personnel’s visas were approved, after 14 days of compulsory quarantine upon arriving at Hong Kong, the LCSD believed that this part of the works could be completed within a few days.

(iii) According to the information provided by ArchSD, the track resurfacing and the improvement works of other field facilities at Tsing Yi Sports Ground would be completed from July to September this year. Since LCSD would have to wait for the certificate of approval issued by the World Athletics Federation after the completion of the track marking works, LCSD had not set a definite completion date.

(iv) LCSD had implemented the “Inclusive Park for Pets” scheme at Tai Wo Hau Road Playground for a long time and was actively considering implementing the above-mentioned scheme at other parks in the district, such as Tsing Yi Promenade. He pointed out that there were still many people who were afraid of dogs. It depended on the response of nearby residents and whether the park users were mainly elderly people and children to select suitable locations for the implementation of the above-mentioned scheme. He welcomed comments from Members on the selection of locations of the “Inclusive Park for Pets” scheme.

(v) Recreational and sports activities in April and May were cancelled due to the pandemic. The unspent balance would be fully returned to the DC. LCSD would resume organising recreational and sports activities from June onwards.

(vi) When planting plants on roadsides, LCSD would choose plants that were easy to care for, drought-tolerant and densely branched to avoid the accumulation of waste on flower beds. LCSD would continue to monitor the growth of plants. They could also replace the plants when necessary in the future.

(vii) Regarding rodent infestation at Shek Yam Road Rest Garden, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 2, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 3, and Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 4, the cleaning staff would inspect the above-mentioned venues and perform cleaning work, and the large-scale clean-up teams of the LCSD would also check the flower beds for rat holes 43 Responsible Department every week. If rodents were found, LCSD would discuss corresponding measures with the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD), such as hiring a professional rodent control company to place rodent baits, cage traps and block rat holes at the venues to prevent rodent infestation. The large-scale clean-up teams would also put anti-mosquito oil and anti-mosquito sand at the venues to prevent mosquito infestations. As the above-mentioned venues were close to the market and were prone to become the habitations for rodents, LCSD would follow the pest control advice from FEHD and cut off food sources of pests and endeavoured to prevent mosquito and rodent infestations.

(viii) LCSD would also follow up on the mosquito and rodent infestations at Tsing Hung Road Playground and strengthen mosquito and rodent control work.

(ix) Mosquito infestation was particularly serious in summer. LCSD had been paying attention to the sanitary conditions of its venues and increasing the frequency of spraying anti-mosquito sprays. LCSD was now considering installing mosquito killers at its venues. Members were welcome to provide opinions to LCSD on the locations of the installation.

(x) LCSD would follow up on the uneven surface of the pavements at Shek Pai Street Park with ArchSD. LCSD would arrange road levelling works for uneven road surfaces at the above-mentioned parks where road bricks on pavements were affected by tree roots.

(xi) LCSD had discussed with ArchSD to widen the drain at Nga Ying Chau Garden to remove stagnant water. LCSD would follow up with ArchSD on the above-mentioned matter later.

112. Mr KWOK Tsz-kin asked whether LCSD had carried out cold fog anti-mosquito work at Tsing Hung Road Playground.

113. Mr FUNG Hon-wa, Harris responded that mosquito infestation at Tsing Hung Road Playground was particularly serious, therefore cold fog anti-mosquito work had been carried out at the above-mentioned venue.

114. Mr LAM Siu-fai put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

44 Responsible Department (i) The pest control team of the FEHD stated that LCSD was responsible for the sanitation of flower beds, and requested LCSD to arrange cleaning staff to inspect whether there were rat holes at Shek Yam Road Rest Garden, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 2, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 3, and Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 4.

(ii) Many styrofoam boxes were randomly abandoned at the above-mentioned venues, but the on-site cleaning staff of LCSD did not stop them, and FEHD personnels could not enter LCSD venues to clean up the styrofoam boxes. He requested LCSD to take follow-up actions.

(iii) Many swimming venues had reopened. He enquired why LCSD the North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool had not been reopened and pointed out that many residents in the district could only go to the more distant Shing Mun Valley Swimming Pool in Tsuen Wan.

115. Mr LAU Chi-kit put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) There were a lot of tracks at sports grounds in Hong Kong. There were also 2 tracks in Kwai Tsing District. He estimated that the number of tracks in the 18 districts should be no less than 36. He asked why LCSD had no approved track marking technicians in Hong Kong.

(ii) To avoid the situation where works could not be carried out in Hong Kong because relevant personnel were unable to arrive in Hong Kong due to entry restrictions, which would affect the service arrangements of the facilities, he believed that LCSD needed to arrange training for staff and train relevant technical talents to meet the needs in the long-term development of Hong Kong.

(iii) He asked if LCSD could explain the professional qualifications required for approved track marking technicians.

116. Mr KWOK Tsz-kin pointed out that Tsing Hung Road Playground was near the idle site of LandsD near and asked how LCSD would cooperate with LandsD to solve the mosquito and rodent infestation problems there.

117. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

45 Responsible Department (i) LCSD could send personnels to conduct on-site inspections at Tsing Hung Road Playground with representatives of the LandsD and strengthen mosquito and rodent control work.

(ii) He noted the Committee’s suggestion on training approved track marking technicians.

(iii) LCSD would follow up on the mosquito and rodent infestations at Shek Yam Road Rest Garden, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 2, Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 3, and Shek Yam Road Rest Garden No. 4, and would also remind on-site cleaning staff to prevent styrofoam boxes from being abandoned at the above-mentioned venues, and would follow up with the FEHD to clean up styrofoam boxes.

(iv) North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool had to be temporarily closed due to the pandemic and a shortage of lifeguards. Seasonal lifeguards would report duty successively, and it was expected that the above-mentioned swimming pool would be partially open at the end of June.

118. Mr LAM Siu-fai opined that it was unreasonable that North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool could not be reopened due to insufficient lifeguards. He pointed out that many swimming venues had reopened and the lifeguards of other venues should be mobilised to meet the needs of North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool. At present, residents had to go to the more distant Shing Mun Valley Swimming Pool in Tsuen Wan. Such service arrangement was not fair to residents in the district.

119. Mr LAU Chi-kit further enquired what professional qualifications the approved track marking technicians had to obtain. He said that if LCSD did not have relevant information for the time being, they could provide it to Members after the meeting.

120. Mr FUNG Hon Wa, Harris gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) LCSD would contact ArchSD after the meeting to learn of the professional qualifications required for approved track marking technicians.

(ii) The manpower of lifeguards at other swimming venues was only sufficient to meet the needs at those venues, so it was difficult to deploy the

46 Responsible Department manpower. LCSD hoped to gradually open North Kwai Chung Jockey Club Swimming Pool as soon as possible and noted Members’ opinions.

Report on the Promotional Activities and the Utilisation of Public Libraries in Kwai Tsing District by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (PDFMC Paper No. 29/I/2020)

121. Mr LEE Wai-man, Jimmy, Senior Librarian (Kwai Tsing) of LCSD introduced the Paper.

122. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren said that he would submit topics related to sexual minority books at the next meeting, and LCSD could make preparations in advance.

Work Report on the Cultural Activities Organised in Kwai Tsing District by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (PDFMC Paper No. 30/I/2020)

123. Ms WONG Fan-ni, Jasmine, Senior Manager (New Territories South) Promotion of LCSD introduced the Paper.

124. Mr LAM Siu-fai said that residents had not been able to enjoy entertainment programmes for several months. He asked if the pandemic subsided, whether LCSD would use the unspent balance from activities cancelled due to the pandemic and consider organising one or two large-scale Mid-Autumn Festival or family activities in Kwai Chung and Tsing Yi.

125. Mr LAU Chi-kit put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) “District Free Entertainment Programmes Planned to be Held by the LCSD in Kwai Tsing District from June to September 2020” listed in Annex B included outdoor venues such as Shek Yam Estate Rest Garden and Cheung Fat Estate Amphitheatre. He asked if the “Prohibition on Group Gathering” measure continued, whether LCSD would organise the above-mentioned activities.

(ii) He believed that the purpose of the “Prohibition on Group Gathering” measure which limited the number of people in outdoor activities was to prevent citizens from participating in activities to express their opinions. He once again urged the government to revoke the relevant regulations. 47 Responsible Department

126. Ms WONG Fan-ni, Jasmine gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) When LCSD applied for funding from the DC, they had stated that the purpose of the funding was to arrange free cultural and entertainment programmes in Kwai Tsing District. LCSD had to follow the above-mentioned purpose of the funding and return the unspent balance to the DC for other uses as soon as possible.

(ii) She understood the demand of residents for cultural and entertainment programmes. If circumstances allow, she would arrange resumption of performances as soon as possible and consider increasing the number of performances where feasible.

(iii) The planned activities listed in Annex B had to be adjusted in response to the pandemic and the development of the “Prohibition on Group Gathering” measures. It was difficult for LCSD to confirm that the activities from July to September would be held as scheduled at the moment. If there was any further information, she would report it to Members in due course.

(Post-meeting notes: LCSD indicated that in response to the latest situation of COVID-19, the district free entertainment programmes planned to be held in Kwai Tsing District in July had been cancelled.)

Progress Report of Kwai Tsing District Works Projects (PDFMC Paper No. 31/I/2020)

127. Mr KWAN Yu-hang, Jason, Engineer/24 (West) of the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) introduced the Paper.

128. Mr CHEUNG Kwan-kiu, Steve put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) The commencement date of Works 11NW-A/R23 at Kau Wah Keng Village had been postponed for nearly 1 year. However, as the rainy season was approaching, and there were many dangerous slopes in the village, he was worried that it would pose a danger to the safety of residents.

48 Responsible Department (ii) He learnt that there were many disputes with private developers in Kau Wah Keng Village over land prices and land rights, and asked whether the matters of land prices had been clarified with LandsD.

(Post-meeting notes: CEDD indicated that CEDD had originally planned to start the consolidation works for slope number 11NW-A/R23 in October last year. Given the potential land boundary problems discovered during the making of the detailed design last year, CEDD immediately wrote to LandsD to clarify the land boundary matters after studying with the engineering consultant company and surveyor. Based on past experience, it would take time to resolve land boundary issues, plus there was a need to reapply for land allocation for the works. Therefore, CEDD proposed to postpone the start date to December this year. CEDD received a verbal reply from LandsD in June this year and learnt that LandsD would give a detailed reply in early July. After clarifying the land boundary and slope maintenance responsibilities with LandsD, CEDD hoped to start the works as soon as possible in the third quarter of this year. At the same time, CEDD would regularly check the stability of the slopes before starting the project.)

129. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) The Highways Department (HyD) originally indicated that the retrofitting of a lift at the footbridge across Tsing King Road near On Pak House (structure no.: K&T02) under the “Universal Accessibility” Programme could be commenced at the beginning of this year. However, they later pointed out that due to the pandemic and problems with the tender documents, the works had to be delayed until the end of the year.

(ii) At present, there were only two flight of stairs at the footbridge across Tsing King Road near On Pak House, and the retrofitting of a lift had been delayed all along. He asked about the latest progress of the works.

(Post-meeting notes: HyD stated that HyD had already conducted a tender for the retrofitting of a lift at the above-mentioned footbridge and had just completed the tender review. HyD expected that the works of the relevant contract could be commenced by the end of June this year.)

130. Mr LAU Chi-kit put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

49 Responsible Department (i) The investigation and study work of the widening of Tsuen Wan Road, the expansion of the existing Texaco Road Flyover and the improvement works at relevant junctions were expected to be completed in 2022 the soonest. He believed that the investigation and study work took too long.

(ii) There was a container terminal at Wang Lung Street in Tsuen Wan. Many trucks needed to pass through that area, thereby seriously affecting the bus routes from Tsing Yi to Tsuen Wan. He believed that after the completion of the works, it would help ease traffic flow and relieve traffic congestion, and asked when the commencement and completion dates of the above-mentioned works could be affirmed.

(Post-meeting notes: HyD indicated that the expansion works at Texaco Road Flyover and the improvement works at Tsuen Tsing Interchange had been included in the scope of investigation and study of the widening works at Tsuen Wan Road. The engineering consultant of HyD was currently conducting traffic and environmental impact assessments on the relevant works. The preliminary design, public consultation and gazette publication in accordance with the Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap. 370) would be carried out later. The timetable for the implementation of the relevant works could only be determined after the investigation and study work mentioned above was substantially completed. HyD and its engineering consultant would explore and actively study an early implementation of that part of the works, and would complete the relevant works in the early stage of the widening works at Tsuen Wan Road.)

131. Mr KWAN Yu-hang, Jason responded that he was unable to provide a detailed response on behalf of other departments, but he had noted the questions raised by Members and would follow up with relevant departments after the meeting.

132. The Chairman said that he had requested the Secretariat to invite HyD to become a standing member of the Committee and asked why the HyD did not send any representatives to attend the meeting.

133. The Secretary responded that since the captioned report covered the technical research areas of different departments and groups, HyD representatives might not be able to make an appropriate and comprehensive response on the spot, so they had not accepted the Secretariat’s invitation.

50 Responsible Department 134. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded that the captioned report intended to report the projects in the district. If Members had any comments on the above-mentioned arrangements, the Secretariat could discuss it with HyD and CEDD again.

135. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren opined that if the HyD refused to send representatives to the Committee meeting, it would be unfair to the representatives of CEDD.

136. The Chairman indicated that he had also requested the Secretariat to invite ArchSD to become a standing member of the Committee, but ArchSD had also declined of the Secretariat’s invitation.

137. Mr SIN Chung-kai suggested that the Secretary draft a reply slip for Members to fill in the projects they were interested in. Members should send the completed reply slips to the Secretariat within 1 to 2 days after obtaining the meeting papers and reply slip so that the Secretary could invite the responsible colleagues of relevant departments to attend the meetings.

138. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie indicated that the Secretariat could make corresponding arrangements with relevant departments. She hoped that Members would send the completed reply slip to the Secretariat as soon as possible, otherwise the representatives of relevant departments might not be able to send representatives to attend the meetings in time.

139. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren pointed out that the DC was consulted on many project works, but after obtaining the permission of the DC, they no longer followed up on the progress of the projects with DC Members, for example, the widening of Tsuen Wan Road, the expansion of the existing Texaco Road Flyover and the improvement works at relevant junctions and the works of the retrofitting of a lift at the footbridge across Tsing King Road near On Pak House (structure no.: K&T02) under the “Universal Accessibility” Programme. He hoped that K&TDO and the Secretariat could help assist in arranging follow-up actions.

140. Mr WONG Tin-yan pointed out that the starting date of the studies of the Greening Master Plan (GMP) for New Territories – Studies and Works was February 2012, and the date of the completion of detailed designs was in December 2016, which was some time away from the present. He asked whether the relevant materials of the study were still up to date. 51 Responsible Department

141. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie indicated that she could request the CEDD to provide more information after the meeting.

(Post-meeting notes: CEDD indicated that CEDD had been committed to promoting the GMP for New Territories. After consultation work was carried out from 2012 to 2013, CEDD formulated the GMP for the New Territories in 2014 and completed the priority greening works under the GMP for Southeast and Northwest New Territories in 2017. Later, in response to the “Street Tree Selection Guide” launched by the Development Bureau (DEVB) in 2018 and the latest developments in various districts, CEDD re-examined the GMP (including Kwai Tsing District) in Southwest and Northeast New Territories and introduced the latest proposed greening measures and implementation schedule to the DC in March 2019 by circulation. CEDD also briefed the Panel on Development of the LegCo on the works of the GMP for Southwest and Northeast New Territories (including Kwai Tsing District) on 25 June 2019. The consultant company had completed the detailed design of the greening works, and preparation of the tender documents for the contract of the works had been substantially completed. CEDD was now applying for funding from the LegCo for the works of the GMP for Southwest and Northeast New Territories (including Kwai Tsing District). After the funding was approved, CEDD would commence the works as soon as possible).

142. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren enquired whether it was possible to make enquiries about each works item contained in the report and requested the relevant departments to submit a document for each works item.

143. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie indicated that that approach would increase the workload of the responsible colleagues of relevant departments. She suggested implementing the suggestion of Mr SIN Chung-kai, SBS, JP first, so that Members should fill in the projects they were interested in and requested the responsible colleagues of the relevant departments to provide explanations.

144. Ms LEUNG Kar-ming expressed disappointment that the HyD refused to send representatives to the meeting. She opined that the HyD needed to further explain and follow up on the widening of Tsuen Wan Road, the expansion of the existing Texaco Road Flyover and the improvement works at relevant junctions.

145. The Chairman pointed out that in the works of “Installation and replacement of air-conditioning system at Fung Shue Wo Sports Centre” proposed by LCSD, ArchSD

52 Responsible Department was one of the works agent, but ArchSD had never sent a member to attend the meetings. He opined that the ArchSD did not take DC seriously.

146. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded that under normal circumstances, the leading Department was responsible for answering questions related to project works and would seldom invite departments of the works to attend meetings.

Report on Works Progress and Cash Flow Forecast of District Minor Works Projects 2020-21 (as in May 2020) (PDFMC Paper No. 32/I/2020)

Report on Progress of District Minor Works Projects Proposed by DC Members or Other Individuals (as in May 2020)ort on Progress of District Minor Works Projects Proposed by DC Members or Other Individuals (as in February 2020) (PDFMC Paper No. 33/I/2020)

147. The Chairman announced that discussion on agenda items 10 to 11 would be combined.

148. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie introduced the paper.

149. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren put forth enquiries as follows:

(i) The latest progress of the retrofitting of a barrier-free passage next to Nga Ying Chau Garden, and whether a party had committed to carry out the above-mentioned works earlier but now refused to carry out the relevant works.

(ii) The cash flow of the retrofitting of seats at the rain shelter near On Mei House, Cheung On Estate on Tsing King Road in Tsing Yi.

150. Mr WONG Tin-yan pointed out that the works on the provision of maintenance services for the vertical green wall at Lai King Community Hall could not achieve the effect of beautification. Its water spray device also made the roads always slippery. The opinions of nearby residents tended to be negative. As the works section of K&TDO was responsible for the above-mentioned works, he asked whether K&TDO had assessed if the location and effectiveness of the works were appropriate.

151. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie gave a consolidated response as follows: 53 Responsible Department

(i) K&TDO would provide the cash flow of the works of the retrofitting of seats at the rain shelter near On Mei House, Cheung On Estate on Tsing King Road in Tsing Yi after the meeting.

(Post-meeting notes: K&TDO indicated that they had provided Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren with the cash flow of the above-mentioned works after the meeting.)

(ii) K&TDO had drawn up a preliminary route for the retrofitting of a barrier-free passage next to Nga Ying Chau Garden. But according to this route, a lot of trees had to be moved. At present, K&TDO hoped to optimise the route design and find another route that would be brighter and easier to maintain and with lower construction cost. Since the above-mentioned works involved private land, K&TDO also hoped to clarify the boundaries as soon as possible or to start the works on non-private land. K&TDO would notify DC members concerned before the works commenced.

(iii) The vertical green wall at Lai King Community Hall was built in response to the green initiative. The performance of the original maintenance service contractor was even less satisfactory. K&TDO had to send staff to conduct inspections every other day. After the contractor was replaced, the ground had already been less slippery. K&TDO had also adopted plants that were less susceptible to wilting and taken reference at green walls of other commercial buildings, but the plants they used were more expensive. K&TDO hoped to strike a balance between plant maintenance and expenditure.

(iv) K&TDO would follow up on the above issues with the contractor. Recently, due to serious mosquito infestation, K&TDO had sent staff to step up inspections and reminded the contractor to step up anti-mosquito work.

152. Mr WONG Tin-yan put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

(i) The problem did not improve after replacing the maintenance service contractor. He enquired whether K&TDO would consider removing the green wall. 54 Responsible Department

(ii) Whether K&TDO had a review mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of the project.

153. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded as follows:

(i) K&TDO had only changed the contractor once. She believed that more time was needed to evaluate the performance of the existing contractor.

(ii) After the expiration of the maintenance service contract, K&TDO would apply funding from the Committee. Members could then review the effectiveness of the green wall. K&TDO would also carefully review the effectiveness of the green wall.

Any Other Business

154. The Chairman put forth opinions as follows:

(i) At the Recreation and Culture Committee (RCC) meeting held on 4 May 2020, Members suggested that the Chairman of RCC and the Chairman of the Planning and District Facilities Management Committee (PDFMC) should clarify the terms of reference of the Committees, and review the focus of the meeting discussions according to their terms of reference.

(ii) After the discussion of the Chairman and Vice-chairman of PDFMC, the Chairman and Vice-chairman of RCC, the Secretariat, and LCSD, the revision of the terms of reference of the two Committees regarding the cooperation between LCSD and DC in Kwai Tsing was supported and they would like to consult Members on it.

(iii) It was now proposed that Article 2(a) of the current terms of reference of PDFMC, which was, under the circumstances of obtaining DC Funds, to undertake or cooperate with relevant government departments and organisations in the district to promote recreational and sports activities, library promotion activities and free entertainment programmes organised by LCSD in the district, would be included in the terms of reference of RCC. RCC would be responsible for vetting the proposals of recreational and sports activities, library promotion activities and free entertainment programmes organised by LCSD in the coming year, and would discuss

55 Responsible Department the details, funding and use of funds of LCSD activities in RCC meetings. PDFMC would focus on matters related to planning and facility management.

155. Mr TAM Ka-chun, Warren enquired whether the above-mentioned arrangement meant that the activities held by LCSD, which were so-called “software”, would be discussed at RCC meetings; and the facilities under LCSD, which were so-called “hardware”, would be discussed at PDFMC meetings.

156. The Chairman responded as follows:

(i) He indicated that in the future, cultural, recreational and sports activities held by the LCSD would be discussed at RCC meetings, and the management and maintenance of facilities under the LCSD such as libraries and civic centres would be discussed at PDFMC meetings.

(ii) He believed that the proposals of public library promotion programmes, recreational and sports programmes, and district free entertainment programmes of the LCSD had little to do with PDFMC.

(iii) If Members had no objection to the above matter, the Secretariat would consult RCC on the above suggestion. If both Committees supported the relevant amendment, the Secretariat would prepare documents for discussion and endorsement at DC Full Council Meeting.

157. Mr LAM Siu-fai pointed out that the duration of PDFMC meetings was long. He suggested meetings be held in the morning to give Members enough time to put forth their opinions.

158. Mr SIN Chung-kai, SBS, JP agreed with the suggestion of Mr LAM Siu-fai and suggested that the Secretariat arrange agenda items for both the morning and afternoon sessions so that Members and standing members could arrange the time to attend the meeting.

159. The Chairman indicated that if Members had no objection to the above matter, PDFMC meetings would be held in the morning.

160. Mr WONG Bing-kuen put forth opinions and enquiries as follows:

56 Responsible Department (i) The collapsible gate of the activity room on the 2nd floor of Tai Wo Hau Estate Community Centre (TWHECC) was rusty, making opening and closing the gate difficult. He requested K&TDO to replace the gate or repair it.

(ii) The above-mentioned activity room had dim lights and insufficient lighting. He requested K&TDO to replace them with brighter yellow light tubes or switch to white light tubes.

161. Miss YIM Yik-huen, Bonnie responded as follows:

(i) K&TDO would follow up on the issue of the gate of the activity room on the 2nd floor of TWHECC.

(ii) K&TDO would follow up on the issue of the above-mentioned lighting equipment in the activity room, and would notify DC members concerned after the replacement works were completed.

Date of Next Meeting

162. The next meeting was scheduled to be held on 18 August 2020 (Tuesday).

Kwai Tsing District Council Secretariat August 2020

57