List of 152 Government Man-Made Slopes Upgraded Under the Landslip Prevention and Mitigation Programme (Lpmitp) in 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
332 Controlling Officer's Reply
Examination of Estimates of Expenditure 2019-20 Reply Serial No. FHB(FE)332 CONTROLLING OFFICER’S REPLY (Question Serial No. 5578) Head: (49) Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Subhead (No. & title): (-) Not specified Programme: (2) Environmental Hygiene and Related Services Controlling Officer: Director of Food and Environmental Hygiene (Miss Vivian LAU) Director of Bureau: Secretary for Food and Health Question: How many unisex toilets are there in the territory? Please provide their addresses with a breakdown by the 18 districts. Does the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department have any plan to continuously increase the number of unisex toilets? If yes, please provide the details. Asked by: Hon CHAN Chi-chuen (LegCo internal reference no.: 409) Reply: The Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (the Department) has 379 public toilets with accessible unisex toilets (AUTs) provision. A list of these toilets is provided at Annex. If circumstances permit, the Department will, based on “The Design Manual on Barrier Free Access 2008”, provide AUTs at new public toilets or during reprovisioning or refurbishment of existing ones. Access to AUTs does not necessitate traversing an area reserved for one sex only. - End - Session 13 FHB(FE) - Page 901 Annex (Page 1 of 20) List of Public Toilets with Accessible Unisex Toilets Serial District Name of Public Toilet Address No. 1 Central/Western Belcher's Street Public Behind No.2-12 Belcher's Street, Sai Toilet Wan 2 Central/Western Centre Street Public Toilet Near Centre Street Market, -
Completion Report (MEEF 2019-002, Phase I) Value of Peri-Urban And
Completion Report (MEEF 2019‐002, Phase I) Value of peri‐urban and Small‐scale Mangrove Forests in the Pearl River Estuary as Fish Habitats Executive Summary This project aims to investigate the importance of peri‐urban, small‐scale mangrove patches in the Pearl River estuary (PRE) in supporting fishery production through the provision of nursery environments. The capacity for coastal wetlands such as mangrove forests to act as nursery sites is thought to depend on (a) the habitat structural complexity; and /or (b) the provision of food; these dependencies are respectively termed the “protection” and “food” hypotheses. Despite that these hypotheses having been proposed for decades, little direct evidence is available for assessing their application to mangrove ecosystems, especially small patches in peri‐urban settings. This study tests the protection hypothesis using small mangrove patches in Hong Kong and the PRE. The specific work packages (WP) of the project are: 1. To assess the value of peri‐urban small‐scale mangrove forests in the Pearl River estuary as habitat for juvenile fish. We survey the types and species of fish that utilize mangrove patches using underwater video cameras and nets. 2. To understand the importance of mangrove forest structural complexity for supporting juvenile fish use of the habitat. We conduct ex situ predation experiments using 3D printed real‐size mangrove structure and observe how juvenile prey fish utilize complex mangrove structures as protection from predation by larger fish. 3. To forecast juvenile fish behaviour in realistic mangrove structures under different environmental constraints using Individual Based Models (IBM). We are constructing the IBMs in a collaboration with the University of Giessen in Germany. -
Strategic Environmental Assessment : Final Report
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT : FINAL REPORT Hyder-Mott Connell Joint Venture This report is prepared by Hyder-Mott Connell Joint Venture for information and discussion purposes. The findings and recomme ndations do not necessarily represent the views of the HKSARG. Planning Department Agreement No. CE 25/2001 Hong Kong 2030: Planning Vision and Strategy – Strategic Environmental Assessment Final Report Author VARIOUS Checker GUI YI LI Approver ANNE KERR June 2007 This report has been prepared for the Planning Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for Agreement No. CE25/2001 Hong Kong 2030: Planning Vision and Strategy - Strategic Environmental Assessment dated October 2001. Hyder Consulting Limited and Mott Connell Limited cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. Agreement No. CE 25/2001 Hong Kong 2030: Planning Vision and Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment Final Report AGREEMENT NO. CE 25/2001 HONG KONG 2030: PLANNING VISION AND STRATEGY STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A : ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Preamble 1 1.2 Study Background 2 1.3 Study Objectives 3 1.4 Scope of Work 4 1.5 Structure of the SEA Final Report 5 2 BASELINE CONDITIONS 6 2.1 General 6 2.2 Air Quality 6 2.3 Noise Conditions 8 2.4 Geology, Soils and Contaminated Land 9 2.5 Water Resources and Water Quality 11 2.6 Waste 13 2.7 Energy and -
List of Recognized Villages Under the New Territories Small House Policy
LIST OF RECOGNIZED VILLAGES UNDER THE NEW TERRITORIES SMALL HOUSE POLICY Islands North Sai Kung Sha Tin Tuen Mun Tai Po Tsuen Wan Kwai Tsing Yuen Long Village Improvement Section Lands Department September 2009 Edition 1 RECOGNIZED VILLAGES IN ISLANDS DISTRICT Village Name District 1 KO LONG LAMMA NORTH 2 LO TIK WAN LAMMA NORTH 3 PAK KOK KAU TSUEN LAMMA NORTH 4 PAK KOK SAN TSUEN LAMMA NORTH 5 SHA PO LAMMA NORTH 6 TAI PENG LAMMA NORTH 7 TAI WAN KAU TSUEN LAMMA NORTH 8 TAI WAN SAN TSUEN LAMMA NORTH 9 TAI YUEN LAMMA NORTH 10 WANG LONG LAMMA NORTH 11 YUNG SHUE LONG LAMMA NORTH 12 YUNG SHUE WAN LAMMA NORTH 13 LO SO SHING LAMMA SOUTH 14 LUK CHAU LAMMA SOUTH 15 MO TAT LAMMA SOUTH 16 MO TAT WAN LAMMA SOUTH 17 PO TOI LAMMA SOUTH 18 SOK KWU WAN LAMMA SOUTH 19 TUNG O LAMMA SOUTH 20 YUNG SHUE HA LAMMA SOUTH 21 CHUNG HAU MUI WO 2 22 LUK TEI TONG MUI WO 23 MAN KOK TSUI MUI WO 24 MANG TONG MUI WO 25 MUI WO KAU TSUEN MUI WO 26 NGAU KWU LONG MUI WO 27 PAK MONG MUI WO 28 PAK NGAN HEUNG MUI WO 29 TAI HO MUI WO 30 TAI TEI TONG MUI WO 31 TUNG WAN TAU MUI WO 32 WONG FUNG TIN MUI WO 33 CHEUNG SHA LOWER VILLAGE SOUTH LANTAU 34 CHEUNG SHA UPPER VILLAGE SOUTH LANTAU 35 HAM TIN SOUTH LANTAU 36 LO UK SOUTH LANTAU 37 MONG TUNG WAN SOUTH LANTAU 38 PUI O KAU TSUEN (LO WAI) SOUTH LANTAU 39 PUI O SAN TSUEN (SAN WAI) SOUTH LANTAU 40 SHAN SHEK WAN SOUTH LANTAU 41 SHAP LONG SOUTH LANTAU 42 SHUI HAU SOUTH LANTAU 43 SIU A CHAU SOUTH LANTAU 44 TAI A CHAU SOUTH LANTAU 3 45 TAI LONG SOUTH LANTAU 46 TONG FUK SOUTH LANTAU 47 FAN LAU TAI O 48 KEUNG SHAN, LOWER TAI O 49 KEUNG SHAN, -
L/St68/4 L/St66/1 L/St72/1 L/St41a/1A L/St14b/3 L/St7/1B L
TAI PO KAU CENTRE ISLAND New Village fi”· U¤J |ÅA» Seaview ( A CHAU ) Emerald Palace Ha Wun Yiu Villas Qflt flK W⁄¶ EAST RAIL LINE Wu Kwai Sha Tsui J¸ Lai Chi Shan Pottery Kilns …P Sheung Wong Yi Au FªK W¤J Fan Sin Temple t 100 ‹pfi Ser Res Sheung Wun Yiu j¤H®] “‚” 100 The Paramount Golf Course Tai Po Kau B»A» ” Lo Wai i±Î Savanna Garden Constellation Cove j¤H®] «‰fi ¥¥ Cheung Uk Tei s·Î s¤ Tai Po Kau Villa Costa JC Castle San Wai Whitehead 200 San Uk Ka 282 t Headland flK Ser Res · L/ST111/4 Lai Chi Hang ⁄Ɖ 65 200 s·A» To Tau Providence Bay 300 Villa Castell QªJ WU KAI SHA Tsung Tsai Yuen 100 ‡fl L/ST110/3 400 s¤»³ b¥s DeerHill Bay Hilltop Garden Pun Shan Chau “ dª Double Cove «^ 200 øª è¦ Nai Chung ¼¿ Cheung SAI SHA ROAD Symphony Bay TOLO HIGHWAY Q¯Ë Sai O 500 Tsiu Hang Kang C Q¯Ë· Wu Kai Sha 100 300 ' L/ST100/3 A` Q¯Ë·F¨C Wu Kai Sha ¨»·E … Pumping x© Lookout Wu Kwai Sha Village Lake Silver Station Kwun Hang Ø¿⁄ 408 aª Youth Village Cheung Muk Tau … ¥ Sw P ¤bs fi A» Cheung Shue Pak Shek Kok Ma On Shan o´ ¸¤[ Villa Oceania Monte Vista Water Treatment fi Tan Park As »›· Villa Athena fi¶ Yuen Tun Ha ƒB Kon Hang Kam Lung Q§w 100 Works Hong Kong Science Park fił Lo Lau Uk Bayshore Towers Court Lee On Pipeline 300 ¶d Estate Water Tunnel “ I´_Ä Wong Nai Fai Marbella ¤b Saddle Ridge Ma On Shan Garden t P¿ |¹w s• Ser Res Yin Ngam Y© A Sunshine City ´¥K Po Min A^ L/ST108/2 400 Ta Tit Yan 438 MA LIU SHUI Ʊ 200 j⁄Hfi]ƒM@¯z† 100 Chung On ¤b Kam Ying Pai Mun Kam Fung 200 300 Estate Court Court t TAI PO KAU NATURE RESERVE j¤H MA ON SHAN Ser Res 500 Tai Po -
GEO REPORT No. 282
EXPERT REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK IN HONG KONG GEO REPORT No. 282 R.J. Sewell & D.L.K. Tang GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OFFICE CIVIL ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION EXPERT REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK IN HONG KONG GEO REPORT No. 282 R.J. Sewell & D.L.K. Tang This report was originally produced in June 2009 as GEO Geological Report No. GR 2/2009 2 © The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region First published, July 2013 Prepared by: Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department, Civil Engineering and Development Building, 101 Princess Margaret Road, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong. - 3 - PREFACE In keeping with our policy of releasing information which may be of general interest to the geotechnical profession and the public, we make available selected internal reports in a series of publications termed the GEO Report series. The GEO Reports can be downloaded from the website of the Civil Engineering and Development Department (http://www.cedd.gov.hk) on the Internet. Printed copies are also available for some GEO Reports. For printed copies, a charge is made to cover the cost of printing. The Geotechnical Engineering Office also produces documents specifically for publication in print. These include guidance documents and results of comprehensive reviews. They can also be downloaded from the above website. The publications and the printed GEO Reports may be obtained from the Government’s Information Services Department. Information on how to purchase these documents is given on the second last page of this report. -
Development of a Bathing Beach at Lung Mei, Tai Po”
40/F, Revenue Tower, 5 Gloucester Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong 香港灣仔告士打道 5 號稅務大樓 40 樓 ACE Paper 27/2008 For advice Environmental Impact Assessment Report on “Development of a Bathing Beach at Lung Mei, Tai Po” Additional Information on Ecological Surveys PURPOSE On 14 January 2008, the Advisory Council on the Environment (ACE) endorsed with conditions the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report on “Development of a Bathing Beach at Lung Mei, Tai Po”. This paper provides additional information to confirm the ecological status of the habitat of Lung Mei Beach as concluded in the EIA report, addresses the conditions in the endorsement and other concerns of the ACE. ADVICE SOUGHT 2. Members are invited to note and comment on the information provided in this paper. BACKGROUND 3. The views and recommendations of the ACE on the EIA report discussed at the meeting on 14 January 2008 were set out at Annex A. METHODOLOGY OF ECOLOGICAL SURVEYS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT UNDER THE EIA REPORT ENDORSED BY ACE WITH CONDITIONS ON 14 JANUARY 2008 4. The purpose of the ecological survey focused on collecting representative ecological data to fill information gaps concerning the following: (i) to identify the dominant and typical flora and fauna species present in the Study Area (included 500 m from the Project Site Boundary); (ii) to establish the general ecological profile, physical and ecological characteristics of the site; and (iii) to determine the presence of key factors described in Notes 1 to 3 attached to Appendix A of Annex 16 of Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (TM), including recognized sites of conservation importance, important habitats where an ecological assessment will be necessary and species of conservation importance. -
List of Access Officer (For Publication)
List of Access Officer (for Publication) - (Hong Kong Police Force) District (by District Council Contact Telephone Venue/Premise/FacilityAddress Post Title of Access Officer Contact Email Conact Fax Number Boundaries) Number Western District Headquarters No.280, Des Voeux Road Assistant Divisional Commander, 3660 6616 [email protected] 2858 9102 & Western Police Station West Administration, Western Division Sub-Divisional Commander, Peak Peak Police Station No.92, Peak Road 3660 9501 [email protected] 2849 4156 Sub-Division Central District Headquarters Chief Inspector, Administration, No.2, Chung Kong Road 3660 1106 [email protected] 2200 4511 & Central Police Station Central District Central District Police Service G/F, No.149, Queen's Road District Executive Officer, Central 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 Central and Western Centre Central District Shop 347, 3/F, Shun Tak District Executive Officer, Central Shun Tak Centre NPO 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 Centre District 2/F, Chinachem Hollywood District Executive Officer, Central Central JPC Club House Centre, No.13, Hollywood 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 District Road POD, Western Garden, No.83, Police Community Relations Western JPC Club House 2546 9192 [email protected] 2915 2493 2nd Street Officer, Western District Police Headquarters - Certificate of No Criminal Conviction Office Building & Facilities Manager, - Licensing office Arsenal Street 2860 2171 [email protected] 2200 4329 Police Headquarters - Shroff Office - Central Traffic Prosecutions Enquiry Counter Hong Kong Island Regional Headquarters & Complaint Superintendent, Administration, Arsenal Street 2860 1007 [email protected] 2200 4430 Against Police Office (Report Hong Kong Island Room) Police Museum No.27, Coombe Road Force Curator 2849 8012 [email protected] 2849 4573 Inspector/Senior Inspector, EOD Range & Magazine MT. -
Supplement of Development of a Custom OMI NO2 Data Product For
Supplement of Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5627–5644, 2015 http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/5627/2015/ doi:10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015-supplement © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Supplement of Development of a custom OMI NO2 data product for evaluating biases in a regional chemistry transport model G. Kuhlmann et al. Correspondence to: G. Kuhlmann ([email protected]) and Y. F. Lam (yunfl[email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC-BY 3.0 licence. Table S1: Evaluation of WRF with meteorological observations in Hong Kong. Parameter IOA r MB NMBa RMSE CVa Hong Kong Observatory (HKO) T (◦C) 0.97 0.96 -0.2 -0.8 1.7 8.0 q (g/kg) 0.93 0.94 -1.7 -14.1 2.2 18.2 p (hPa) 0.99 0.98 -0.0 -0.0 0.9 0.1 v (m/s) 0.57 0.28 +0.5 +23.2 1.5 71.4 Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) T (◦C) 0.98 0.97 -0.2 -0.7 1.3 6.1 q (g/kg) 0.97 0.95 -0.3 -2.3 1.4 12.8 p (hPa) 0.99 0.98 +0.1 +0.0 0.9 0.1 v (m/s) 0.68 0.47 -0.4 -10.4 1.6 46.0 Waglan Island (WGL) T (◦C) 0.94 0.94 +1.2 +5.7 2.0 9.5 q (g/kg) 0.88 0.95 +2.5 +21.7 2.8 24.2 p (hPa) 0.99 0.98 +0.4 +0.0 1.0 0.1 v (m/s) 0.84 0.72 +0.0 +0.7 2.1 33.0 T : temperature at 2 m above ground level (agl), q: water vapour mixing ratio 2 m agl, p: sea level pressure, v: wind speed (at station height), a unit percent Table S2: Evaluation of CMAQ NO2 mixing ratios with the PRD RAQM network. -
F #8212; @§P ˙Ƒp #8260; P⁄W — E⁄ Fiaƒ F #8212;卯i” (S ⁄Wƒ角
10 20 fi ]„ Ocean View o´ Water Treatment |§ Works LEAD MINE PASS øªw Hang Hau ˆƒ⁄B Sewage Treatment Works fl Cheung Lek Mei GRASSY HILL P´ »¯ Sausalito ˆƒ⁄B Sewage Treatment Works Œ„¯ Experimental FANLING Farm pfi E¤{ Mountain Shore ˆƒ⁄B Sewage o´ Treatment Water Treatment Works Works eªw ¯ª{ Kau To Ho Lek Pui KAU TO SHAN E¤ Village @´o Shatin Knoll u⁄{ ¥h ' Pumping Station Windsor Park j¤H®u Aı Tai Po Industrial Estate ˆƒ⁄B Shek Lau Tung Sewage Treatment Works • ¥W KAU TO Gas Works ¤ Kam Tai Court o´ Water Treatment Works j¤ ß⁄ Wo Sheung Tun Ma Niu ˆƒ⁄B o´ Water Treatment Works THE SITE Ngau Wu Tok Sewage Treatment Works TAI PO n• _Äø Yiu Dau Ping ˆƒ⁄B ¸I Sewage Treatment Works j⁄ Au Pui Wan ŹD¹z ˆƒ⁄B Kadoorie Farm Sewage Treatment Tai Shui Hang Works A¹~·ã Agricultural Research Centre s¤ o´ Water Treatment »›· Works Hong Kong Science Park Shan Mei I´w¦ Chevalier Garden ˆƒ⁄B Sewage Treatment Works o¼q Disused Mine F¨ fiaƒ ¤‚ SHA TIN Lok Lo Ha F¨Ð¥®º è¦ KWAI TEI Sha Tin Fishermen's @º F¨Ð¥®º A New Village o´ Water Treatment Works Ê®W Royal Ascot fiaƒ Man Hang o´ ˆƒ⁄B Water Treatment Sewage Treatment The Grandville Works SAI KUNGWorks Kwai Tei o´ Water Treatment Works NEW VILLAGE KIU TSUI BEACH pƒ⁄ TING KAU BEACH Nina Tower New Village LIDO BEACH APPROACH BEACH (S⁄Wƒ¨¤‰⁄⁄ CASAM BEACH HOI MEI WAN BEACH ANGLERS' BEACH GEMINI BEACHES 'l⁄ o´ Water Treatment Works Pat Tsz Wo TRIO BEACH HAP MUN BAY BEACH ‡_ Village A KUNG KOK † o´ ¥d Dockyard Water Treatment Works SHA TIN FISHERMEN'S ¤¹¸ Terminal 5 LUK CHAU AU @¤¹¸ CAMPERS' BEACH Terminal 1 Wo -
Executive Summary
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION DRAINAGE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Agreement No. CE 43/2011 (DS) Relocation of Sha Tin Sewage Treatment Works to Caverns – Feasibility Study Re-confirmation of Relocation Site and Study Area for Relocated STSTW – Executive Summary February 2013 AECOM ASIA CO. LTD. Disclaimer: This Re-confirmation of Relocation Site and Study Area for Relocated STSTW – Executive Summary is prepared for The Drainage Services Department (DSD) and is given for its sole benefit in relation to and pursuant to Agreement No. CE 43/2011 (DS) Relocation of Sha Tin Sewage Treatment Works to Caverns – Feasibility Study and may not be disclosed to, quoted to or relied upon by any person (other than DSD) without our prior written consent. No person other than DSD into whose possession a copy of this Re-confirmation of Relocation Site and Study Area for Relocated STSTW – Executive Summary comes may rely on this Re-confirmation of Relocation Site and Study Area for Relocated STSTW – Executive Summary without our express written consent and DSD may not rely on it for any purpose other than as described above. [Blank Page] Agreement No. CE 43/2011 (DS) Re-confirmation of Relocation Site and Study Area for Relocation of Sha Tin Sewage Treatment Works to Caverns – Feasibility Study Relocated STSTW - Executive Summary Table of Content 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ -
Hong Kong's Old Villages
METUPLACES JFA FROM 2018/2 THE PAST LOST IN NEW TOWNS: DOI:METU 10.4305/METU.JFA.2017.2.5 JFA 2018/2 197 (35:2)HONG 197-220 KONG’S OLD VILLAGES PLACES FROM THE PAST LOST IN NEW TOWNS: HONG KONG’S OLD VILLAGES Terry Van DIJK*, Gerd WEITKAMP** Received: 24.02.2016; Final Text: 06.03.2017 INTRODUCTION Keywords: Heritage; new town; master plan; planning; urbanisation. Awareness of Hong Kong’s built heritage and its value is considered to have begun to increase around the time of the end of British rule. The change in Hong Kong’s sovereignty in 1997 prompted a search for its own identity, because while no longer under British rule, and not being nor becoming entirely Chinese, it was not immediately obvious what the emerging Hong Kong should put forward as its cultural identity. The question since that time has also become economically pertinent, as Hong Kong has developed into a major Asian tourist destination. As cultural tourism could be developed into one of the pillars of Hong Kong’s leisure economy, debate emerged on its identity and the built heritage it reflects. This article addresses the popular assumption that before 1997, heritage had been of little interest to Hong Kong’s governments, as articulated by Yung and Chan (2011), Henderson (2001) and Cheung (1999). This negligence was explained by the fact that Hong Kong’s population was growing exponentially through several waves of large-scale immigration, while being under an obviously temporary British government. This resulted in a heterogeneous population (Henderson, 2001) which had just migrated there and was more concerned about access to housing, employment and transportation than the history of the lands they were about to inhabit (Yung and Chan, 2011, 459).