DOCSLIB.ORG

Redalyc.DRAMATIC DEVICES and PHILOSOPHICAL CONTENT IN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redalyc.DRAMATIC DEVICES and PHILOSOPHICAL CONTENT IN Revista Archai E-ISSN: 1984-249X [email protected] Universidade de Brasília Brasil O’Brien, Carl DRAMATIC DEVICES AND PHILOSOPHICAL CONTENT IN PLATO’S SYMPOSIUM Revista Archai, núm. 9, julio, 2012, pp. 73-84 Universidade de Brasília Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=586161971009 Como citar este artigo Número completo Sistema de Informação Científica Mais artigos Rede de Revistas Científicas da América Latina, Caribe , Espanha e Portugal Home da revista no Redalyc Projeto acadêmico sem fins lucrativos desenvolvido no âmbito da iniciativa Acesso Aberto desígnio 9 jul.2012 DRAMATIC DEVICES AND PHILOSOPHICAL CONTENT IN PLATO’S SYMPOSIUM Carl O’Brien* O’ BRIEN, C. (2012). “Dramatic devices and philosophical content in Plato’s Symposium”. Archai n. 9 , jul-dez 2012, pp. 73-84. * National University of Introduction RESUMO: O Banquete de Platão serve-se de recursos dramá- Ireland, Maynooth. My ticos diversos, tais como a história-moldura, a organização dos deepest thanks to Prof. John Dillon (Trinity College, lato’s fondness for dramatic devices, whe- discursos e o ensino de Diotima enquanto meios de orientação Dublin) for his advice and P do leitor pela mensagem filosófica subjacente, a qual inclui comments on this article and ther this refers to framing stories, the use of myth indeed for first introducing um exame do sistema socrático de educação. Os discípulos de me to the Symposium as or the employment of oracular utterances and divine Sócrates demonstram notável entusiasmo pela filosofia, mas an undergraduate. I am signs, is well-known. It has also been frequently extremely grateful to Prof. parecem incapazes de distinguir o amor por Sócrates do amor Gabriele Cornelli and Prof. observed that there is a link between such literary Anastácio Borges de Araújo pela sabedoria. Agatão ocupa posição de destaque: devido a um artifices and the philosophical content which he Junior for the invitation to trocadilho com o seu nome, a jornada do jantar em sua casa se speak at the conference in seeks to deliver. The Symposium is a particularly Recife, as well as to all of good example of this structure in action, to such tornará na ascensão em direção ao Bem. Além disso, ele repre- the participants for their senta a educação sofística e poética, assim como cada um dos responses to this paper, an extent that it could accurately be described by especially to Prof. Francisco Mikhail Bakhtin as the first novel in history. He was oradores representa algum tipo particular de conhecimento, o Gonzalez (University of que implica que não se deveria simplesmente impingir pedantis- Ottawa) for drawing my not alone: Friedrich Schegel referred to the Socratic attention to some of the mo a Eurixímaco, ou tomar o discurso de Aristófanes enquanto more positive aspects of dialogues in general as ‘the novels of their time’. um interlúdio cômico. Eles formam, antes, uma complexa rede Agathon’s speech. The Symposium merits this distinction, not because intertextual. Alcibíades exibe as fraquezas de um homem inábil it is the first example of literature to employ such ou relutante em seguir a totalidade do ensino socrático. Sua soli- dramatic devices, but rather because it is clear citação de ser conduzido por Agatão simboliza a incapacidade de that the author is using such devices as a means of encontrar o próprio caminho do Bem, ao passo que a interrupção conveying an underlying meaning and conditioning da ordem bem organizada do banquete pelos boêmios lembra a the reader’s response. The dramatic elements include atitude dos tiranos e de outros homens hostis à filosofia. Apesar the framing story, the arrangement of the speeches, dessa crítica aos estudantes de Sócrates, o Banquete finaliza Aristophanes’ hiccups, which disrupts their order, com uma nota positiva. As ações finais de Sócrates ocupam-se the lesson of Diotima, which means that the core das outras pessoas – uma crítica implícita a quem sustenta que philosophical content of the dialogue is delivered as a filosofia subverte os laços sociais. a story within a story which has been recounted at PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Banquete – Sócrates – educação – Bem third-hand and finally the interruption of Alcibiades, which is followed by an invasion of revellers leading 73 ABSTRACT: Plato’s Symposium uses dramatical devices, with education, or more specifically those we might such as the framing story, the arrangement of the speeches expect to be capable of providing further informa- or the lesson with Diotima, as a means of guiding the tion regarding love: the tragic poet (Agathon), the reader to the underlying philosophical message, which in- comic poet (Aristophanes), the scientist/physician cludes an examination of the system of Socratic education. (Eryximachus), the lover (Pausanias), the beloved Socrates’ acolytes display a commendable enthusiasm for (Phaedrus), the young man about town (Alcibiades), philosophy, but seem incapable of distinguishing between each of whom, like the philosopher Socrates himself, love of Socrates and love of wisdom. Agathon occupies a fails to provide the sort of enlightenment which we central position: due to punning on his name, the trek to might expect. These discordant notes are struck dinner at his house symbolises the ascent to the Good, and early on in the dialogue during the course of the he represents sophistic and poetic education, just as all of elaborate framing story which Plato constructs as the other speakers represent a particular kind of expertise, a prelude to the philosophical investigation of the meaning that Eryximachus should not simply be dismissed dialogue proper. One must, though, follow Jowett’s as a pedant or Aristophanes’ speech regarded as a comic sage advice: ‘If it be true that there are more things interlude. Rather, they form part of a complex intertextual in the Symposium of Plato than any commentator web. Alcibiades displays the shortcomings of a man unable has dreamed of, it is also true that many things or unwilling to complete the Socratic course of study; his have been imagined which are not really to be found demand to be taken to Agathon symbolises his inability there’. (JOWETT, 1892, p. 524) to find his way to the Good, while the interruption of the revellers into the orderly arrangement of the symposium The Framing Story evokes the attitude of tyrannical men and those hostile towards philosophy. Despite this criticism of some of So- The framing story is a Beglaubigungsapparat, crates’ students, the Symposium closes on a positive note. familiar from other dialogues, which locates the Socrates’ final actions in the dialogue are other-centred; philosophical discussion at a precise time and place, an implied critique of those who claim that philosophy mentions those present at the event and establishes undermines social ties. the overall reliability of the account which we are to KEY-WORDS: Symposium – Socrates – education – Good hear. It happened when Glaucon and Adeimanthus were little, on the occasion of Agathon’s first victory. to the collapse of the symposium. Apollodorus remembers it well as he has recently Although an attempt to treat these aspects recounted the whole story to Glaucon. The problem can have a tendency to adopt a piecemeal approa- here, as so often in Plato, is that discordant ele- ch, and create the impression that the dialogue is ments remind us that the narrative need not be so merely a series of episodes, this is something which accurate. We never learn the name of the companion I hope to avoid by treating all these elements as of Apollodorus who requests the account. We are far part of an overarching stragegy which Plato adopts removed in both time and space from the event: it to shape and inform our reading of the Symposium. happened long ago and Apollodorus himself was These devices introduce a discordant element into not present; he learnt everything from a follower the dialogue, suggesting the failure of the Socratic of Socrates, Aristodemus, who was present, and this elenchus for those who abandon its pursuit pre- remoteness makes Apollodorus’ claims of accuracy maturely and highlighting the difficulties Socrates (by having verified certain details with Socrates, himself faces as an educator attempting to lead his Symp. 173A-B) sound hollow. There are several youthful charges onto a virtuous path. This criticism speeches after Phaedrus’ which Aristodemus could applies to the other guests at the Symposium; while not remember, implying an imperfect knowledge the initial impression is of a random collection of of the guest list and the seating arrangements. representatives of Athenian high society, we find The recitation of the narrative itself might be seen that we are dealing with those concerned either as engaging in philosophy; it takes place during 74 desígnio 9 jul.2012 the ascent to the city (anîon, Symp.172A2) which is limited to the mimetic and he is unable to engage evokes Diotima’s ladder (epanîon, 211B), just as with the account which he received, but must sim- the descent into the Piraeus at the opening of ply recount it in order and by rote. Socrates only the Republic evokes the return of the philosopher ‘always appears to be saying the same things in the into the cave after having attained a vision of the same ways’, according to Alcibiades at 221E, but he Forms (CORRIGAN & GLAZOV-CORRIGAN, 2004). The is like a Silenus, who can be opened up to reveal secondary movement, the walk to Agathon’s house, deeper meaning. or the house of the Good also highlights the process Such emphasis on the accuracy or inaccuracy of philosophising: as Socrates comments, the good of the dialogue can be found elsewhere. In the The- go of their own accord to the banquets of the Good aetetus, Euclides cannot remember the philosophical (Symp.174B). discussion in question, since it happened so long Despite this, it is clear that Socrates’ acolytes in the past, but the dialogue is actually represen- are inadequate philosophers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PLATO's SYMPOSIUM J
    50 ccn~ PLATO'S SYMPOSIUM j - - -- ________j e Library of Liberal Arts PLATO'S SYMPOSIUM Tran lated by BENJAMIN JOWETT With an Introduction by FULTON H. ANDERSON Professor of Philosophy, University of Toronto THE LIBERAL ARTS PRESS NEW YORK CONTENTS SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY .. .... ................................... ......... ... ........... 6 EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION ................... ............................................. 7 SYMPOSIUM APOLLODORUS 13 THE SPEECH OF PHAEDRUS ...... .......................... .......................... .. 19 THE SPEECH OF PAU ANIAS ................. ... ................................. ... .. 21 THE SPEECH OF ERYXIMACHUS 27 THE SPEECH OF ARISTOPHAN E .. ............................... .................. 30 THE SPEECH OF AGATHON ............ .............................................. .. 35 THE SPEECH OF SocRATES ................................ .. ................... ..... .. 39 THE SPEECH OF ALCIBIADES ................. ............... ... ........... ...... .... .. 55 8 PLATO INTROD CTION 9 crescendo, and culminates in the report by Socrates on wi dom and epistemology, upon all of which the Symposium ha bearing, learned from the "wi e" woman Diotima. are intertwined, we m ay set down briefly a few of the more general The dialogue i a "reported" one. Plato himself could not have principles which are to be found in it author's many-sided thought. been present at the original party. (What went on there was told The human soul, a cording to Plato, is es entially in motion. time and time again about Athens.) He was a mere boy when it It is li fe and the integration of living functions. A dead soul is a con­ took place. Nor could the narrator Apollodorus have been a guest; _lladiction in terms. Man throughout his whole nature is erotically he was too young at the time. The latter got his report from motivated. His "love" or desire i manifest in three mutually in­ Aristodemus, a guest at the banquet.
    [Show full text]
  • Phi 260: History of Philosophy I Prof
    Phi 260: History of Philosophy I Prof. Brandon C. Look University of Kentucky Spring 2007 Plato’s Symposium Although we will be looking at the Symposium as work of philosophy, its literary qualities should not be ignored. It can easily be read as a Comedy in three acts (see below), with a prologue (the conversation between Apollodorus and his friend) and an epilogue (Alcibiades’ drunken, tragic (?) account of his love). Consider also the narrative complexity of the work. By the time we get to Diotima’s speech, we have the following levels of narration: Plato says that Apollodorus says that Aristodemus says that Socrates says that Diotima says…Why is there so much distance placed within the narration? Is it supposed to show us how far away the Truth lies? The six speeches given by the attendants can be group into three pairs: Phaedrus and Pausanias; Eryximachus and Aristophanes; and Agathon and Socrates. 1st speech: Phaedrus • There is no greater good for a young boy than a gentle lover, and for a lover a boy to love. • Consider Phaedrus’ suggestion regarding the nature of the relation between lover and beloved: “if a man in love is found doing something shameful… then nothing would give him more pain than being seen by the boy he loves. … If only we could have cities and armies of lovers…” (178d-179a) So, gays in the military would actually be a good thing, right? • Gods honor virtue most highly when it belongs to Love. (180b) 2nd speech: Pausanias • There are two kinds of love: Urania, or Heavenly Aphrodite, and Pandemos, or Common Aphrodite.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Symposium: the Ethics of Desire
    Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire FRISBEE C. C. SHEFFIELD 1 Contents Introduction 1 1. Ero¯s and the Good Life 8 2. Socrates’ Speech: The Nature of Ero¯s 40 3. Socrates’ Speech: The Aim of Ero¯s 75 4. Socrates’ Speech: The Activity of Ero¯s 112 5. Socrates’ Speech: Concern for Others? 154 6. ‘Nothing to do with Human AVairs?’: Alcibiades’ Response to Socrates 183 7. Shadow Lovers: The Symposiasts and Socrates 207 Conclusion 225 Appendix : Socratic Psychology or Tripartition in the Symposium? 227 References 240 Index 249 Introduction In the Symposium Plato invites us to imagine the following scene: A pair of lovers are locked in an embrace and Hephaestus stands over them with his mending tools asking: ‘What is it that you human beings really want from each other?’ The lovers are puzzled, and he asks them again: ‘Is this your heart’s desire, for the two of you to become parts of the same whole, and never to separate, day or night? If that is your desire, I’d like to weld you together and join you into something whole, so that the two of you are made into one. Look at your love and see if this is what you desire: wouldn’t this be all that you want?’ No one, apparently, would think that mere sex is the reason each lover takes such deep joy in being with the other. The soul of each lover apparently longs for something else, but cannot say what it is. The beloved holds out the promise of something beyond itself, but that something lovers are unable to name.1 Hephaestus’ question is a pressing one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lesson of Plato's Symposium
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Eros, Paideia and Arête: The Lesson of Plato’s Symposium Jason St. John Oliver Campbell University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Campbell, Jason St. John Oliver, "Eros, Paideia and Arête: The Lesson of Plato’s Symposium" (2005). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2806 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eros, Paideia and Arête: The Lesson of Plato’s Symposium by Jason St. John Oliver Campbell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Masters of Arts Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Joanne B. Waugh Ph.D. Charles Guignon, Ph.D. Martin Schöenfeld, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 14, 2005 Keywords: Ancient Greece, Socrates, Education, Pedagogy, Sunousia © 2005, Jason St. John Oliver Campbell Acknowledgments I wish to extend a debt of gratitude to Professor Joanne B. Waugh for her continued dedication throughout the completion of this thesis. Table of Contents Abstract ii General Introduction 1 Chapter One 4 Introduction 4 Mousikē: The First Component
    [Show full text]
  • Interpv31issue1 1 29 04 (Page 1)
    Volume 31 Issue 1 Interpretation, Inc. 11367-1597 U.S.A. Flushing, N.Y. Queens College 31/1 A JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Interpretation Fall 2003 3 Ronald Hamowy Two Whig Views of the American Revolution: Adam Ferguson’s Response to Richard Price Discussion: 37 Patrick Coby Mind Your Own Business: The Trouble with Justice in Plato’s Republic 59 Sean Steel Katabasis in Plato’s Symposium Book Reviews: 85 Martin Yaffe The Beginning of Wisdom: Reading Genesis by Leon R. Kass 93 Mera Flaumenhaft Colloquial Hermeneutics: Eva Brann’s Odyssey 103 Wayne Ambler Our Attraction to Justice Devin Stauffer The Idea of Enlightenment: Hanover, PAHanover, 17331 109 Fall 2003 Fall U.S. POSTAGE U.S. POSTAGE Non-Profit Org. A Post-Mortem Study by Permit No. 4 Robert C. Bartlett PAID A JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Editor-in-Chief Hilail Gildin, Dept. of Philosophy, Queens College Associate Editor Erik Dempsey General Editors Seth G. Benardete (d. 2001) • Charles E. Butterworth • Hilail Gildin • Leonard Grey • Robert Horwitz (d. 1978) • Howard B. White (d. 1974) Consulting Editors Christopher Bruell • Joseph Cropsey • Ernest L. Fortin (d. 2002) • John Hallowell (d. 1992) • Harry V. Jaffa • David Lowenthal • Muhsin Mahdi • Harvey C. Mansfield • Arnaldo Momigliano (d. 1987) • Michael Oakeshott (d. 1990) • Ellis Sandoz • Leo Strauss (d. 1973) • Kenneth W. Thompson International Editors Terence E. Marshall • Heinrich Meier Editors Wayne Ambler • Maurice Auerbach • Robert Bartlett • Fred Baumann • Amy Bonnette • Eric Buzzetti • Susan Collins • Patrick Coby • Elizabeth C’de Baca Eastman • Thomas S. Engeman • Edward J. Erler • Maureen Feder-Marcus • Pamela K. Jensen • Ken Masugi • Carol M.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage and Actors in Plato's Symposium Tpeter H
    BLANCKENHAGEN, PETER H. VON, Stage and Actors in Plato's "Symposium" , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 33:1 (1992:Spring) p.51 Stage and Actors in Plato's Symposium tPeter H. von Blanckenhagen ONG PLATONIC DIALOGUES, the Symposium has always Kenjoyed the widest appeal. It contains no difficult or tedi­ ous argumentation; it is not about intellectual problems; it seems easily comprehensible to all readers. It proceeds swift­ ly, with dramatic force and poetic persuasiveness, and holds the reader captive and enthralled. Lofty thoughts and entertaining tales follow one other and intermingle; irony and good-natured humor provide comic relief. Courtesy and easy manners characterize its participants as members of a civilized, educated society, into which each appears introduced as a welcome guest, and to which each reader would be flattered to belong. The Symposium is perhaps the one long and important Greek text that contains nothing forbidding, strange, remote, or alien to us. No other Greek text can be appreciated so immediately as a great piece of literary art; its timelessness is not claimed by tradition but is personally experienced at each reading; its poetic power shines forth always fresh; no dust of millenia has gathered, no patina has to be removed: it is made of pure, solid, and imperishable gold. Yet it does overwhelm us. What has been wrought by a master craftsman has as much grandeur as intimacy, as much beauty as vitality, filled with grace and charm; and it lets us contemplate what we all know as the center of our existence: love. The shock that some may feel at hearing love discussed as love between men can easily be overcome.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Love? Questioning Technocracy in Plato's Symposium
    AS ORIGENS DO PENSAMENTO OCIDENTAL THE ORIGINS OF WESTERN THOUGHT ARTIGO I ARTICLE The End of Love? Questioning technocracy in Plato’s Symposium Philip Krinks i https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-6516 [email protected] i The Centre for Theology & Community – London – UK KRINKS, P. (2020). The End of Love? Questioning technocracy in Plato’s Symposium. Archai 29, e02906. Abstract: Plato’s Symposium contains two accounts of eros which explicitly aim to reach a telos. The first is the technocratic account of the doctor Eryximachus, who seeks an exhaustive account of eros, common to all things with a physical nature. For him medical techne can create an orderly erotic harmony; while religion is defined as the curing of disorderly eros. Against this Socrates recounts the priestess Diotima finding a telos, not in technical exhaustiveness, but in a https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_29_6 [1] 2 Rev. Archai (ISSN: 1984-249X), n. 29, Brasília, 2020, e02906. dialectical definition of eros in the light of the good. What is common to all human beings is the desire to be in eternal relation to the good. All technai are forms of poiesis, by which things pass from being to not being. The erotic harmony recommended by Eryximachus, no less than the Aristophanes” recommendation of eros as “of a half, or of a whole’, is subject to the question whether “it happens to be good’. A self-harmonisation produced by techne can no more evade the sovereignty of good, than can projects of self-completion with a beloved in our likeness.
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND SAILING: Alternative Perspectives on Plato
    Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 132 2015 SECOND SAILING: Alternative Perspectives on Plato Edited by Debra Nails and Harold Tarrant in Collaboration with Mika Kajava and Eero Salmenkivi Societas Scientiarum Fennica The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters Commentationes Humanarun Litterarum is part of the publishing cooperation between the Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters and the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters ISSN 0069-6587 ISBN 978-951-653-409-4 Copyright © 2015 by Societas Scientiarum Fennica Layout by Maija Holappa Printed by Wellprint Oy, Espoo 2015 Contents Preface i Mika Kajava, Pauliina Remes and Eero Salmenkivi Introduction iii Harold Tarrant and Debra Nails Paradigmatic Method and Platonic Epistemology 1 Dimitri El Murr Pseudo-Archytas’ Protreptics? On Wisdom in its Contexts 21 Phillip Sidney Horky Plato and the Variety of Literary Production 41 Mauro Tulli The Meaning of Ἄπολλον‘ ... δαιμονίας ὑπερβολῆς’ in 53 Plato’s Republic 6,509b6–c4: A New Hypothesis A. Gabrièle Wersinger-Taylor Dangerous Sailing: [Plato] Second Alcibiades 147a1–4 59 Harold Tarrant Bad Luck to Take a Woman Aboard 73 Debra Nails Argument and Context: Adaption and Recasting of Positions in 91 Plato’s Dialogues Michael Erler Listening to Socrates in the Theaetetus: Recovering a Lost Narrator 107 Anne-Marie Schultz The Mask of Dialogue: On the Unity of Socrates’ Characterization in 125 Plato’s Dialogues Mario Regali Plato, Socrates, and the genei gennaia sophistikē of Sophist 231b 149 Christopher Rowe Erōs and Dialectic in Plato’s Phaedrus: 169 Questioning the Value of Chronology Francisco J. Gonzalez Changing Course in Plato Studies 187 Gerald A. Press Is the Idea of the Good Beyond Being? 197 Plato’s epekeina tēs ousias Revisited (Republic 6,509b8–10) Rafael Ferber and Gregor Damschen Like Being Nothing: Death and Anaesthesia in Plato Apology 40c 205 Rick Benitez Ideas of Good? 225 Lloyd P.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinterpreting Eros in Plato's Symposium
    Reinterpreting Eros in Plato’s Symposium Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Ancient Greek and Roman Studies Leonard Muellner, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Master’s Degree by Peter Caccavale May 2012 Acknowledgements I would like to thank everyone who encouraged me throughout this process including my family, friends and colleagues. Without your support and guidance I am sure this thesis would never have been successful. I owe special thanks to my advisor, Professor Leonard Muellner, whose continued guidance and suggestions transformed this thesis from scattered thoughts to a structured work. From weekly meetings to editing a constant stream of drafts, your help was invaluable and I am very thankful for all of your advice. I would also like to thank my readers, Professor Patricia Johnston and Professor Cheryl Walker. I appreciate the time you took to read such a large thesis and your suggestions and comments were instrumental in fixing my errors in both grammar and logic. Finally, I am happy to be able to thank Christina for her unwavering support and encouragement. By now you have probably heard more about Plato and Greek grammar than you ever would have wanted, but you have also added more to this work than I think you realize. P.G.C. ii ABSTRACT Redefining Eros in Plato’s Symposium A thesis presented to the Department of Classical Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Peter Caccavale At the heart of the Symposium there lies the conceptual problem of defining the term eros in a manner that remains faithful to both its linguistic and philosophical context.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Philosophic Significance of Eryximachus in Thesymposium
    Stance | Volume 2 | April 2009 A Doctor and a Scholar: Rethinking the Philosophic Significance of Eryximachus in theSymposium ABSTRACT: Too often critics ignore the philosophic significance of Eryximachus, the physician from Plato’s Symposium, and mistakenly dismiss Eryximachus’ presence in the text. However, this paper argues that a review of the role of medicine in the Platonic dialogues, coupled with a close reading of the Symposium’s structure and language reveals how the physician’s emphasis on love as a harmonizing force is analogous to Socrates’ emphasis on balance and harmony throughout the dialogues. Also, the description of the good physician is reflective of the way a good philosopher operates. By employing the medical trope, Eryximachus’ speech allows the reader greater insight into Platonic philosophy. Ronald Ross is a senior undergraduate at Wittenberg University in Springfield, Ohio. He is an English and Philosophy double major, and, unsurprisingly, is captivated by the philosophy of literature. Specifically, Ronald enjoys working with American literature after 1820, especially Gothic and Beat writers. He also takes pleasure in engaging debate on philosophy of science, philosophy of education, and Pragmatism. After taking some time off to teach high school, Ronald hopes to pursue a PhD in English literature. lato’s dialogue the Symposium takes Many times, critics ignore the philosophic place at the playwright Agathon’s significance of Eryximachus, the physician of house the day after Agathon has won the dialogue. an award for one of his tragedies. A wide array of philosophers, including Exhausted from the day before, the host and his Mark Lutz, William Cobb, Kevin Corrigan and Pguests decide to relax and deliver encomiums to Elena Glazov-Corrigan, Nathan Crick and John Eros.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Nature of Plato's Symposium
    The Political Nature of Plato’s Symposium Thomas Moore University of Oxford Classics Class of 2014 Abstract: The dramatic setting of Plato’s Symposium obscures its function as a discourse that establishes the political philosophy of its author. The effort to identify the political within an ostensibly apolitical dialogue reflects the ancient attempt to use the casual and leisurely as a tool for prying open the more serious. I want to suggest that readings of the Symposium which do not attempt to uncover fully the political achieve only a partial understanding of Plato’s program within the work. I also want to establish the possibility that Plato relies on a historical and literary intertext with writers such as Thucydides and Aristophanes in order to key the reader into the underlying, and potentially dangerous, political nature of the dialogue. When such historical intertext goes unnoticed or is dismissed, the reader constructs, I submit, an insurmountable obstacle for the understanding of the work. On the other hand, only when the reader recognizes Plato’s use of historical material, can the Symposium be viewed properly as a forum for the development of political philosophy in the guise of a literary drama. “It seems to me that not only the deeds of fine, good men which are done in seriousness, but also those done at leisure are worthy of mention”. Xenophon, Symposium I.11 The dramatic setting of Plato’s Symposium, a dialogue concerning the nature of Love delivered in reported speech through a series of narrative frames, obscures its function as a discourse that establishes the political philosophy of its author.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Symposium1 CDC Reeve It Is Notoriously Difficult to Discover The
    Colloquium 3 Telling the Truth About Love: Plato's Symposium1 C.D.C. Reeve It is notoriously difficult to discover the truth about erotic love, difficult even to discover who we ought to learn it from (Freud, Darwin, the family doctor, a more experienced friend, a more experienced lover, a less experienced lover ...?). It is this latter difficulty that the Symposium addresses? It is about eros, about erotic love, certainly, but it is as much about authority in things erotic as it is about ta er6tika themselves. My discussion, which outlines an approach to the Symposium as a whole, will proceed in four stages mingling topics as seems appropriate. In Part I, I discuss Agathon, Pausanius, Eryximachus, Aristophanes, and Phaedrus; in Part II, Socrates and his examination of Agathon; in Part III, Diotima's Speech; and in Part IV the speech of Alcibiades. I The collection of people at Agathon's dinner party is presented as being more or less accidental - these just are the people who happened to be there. But, as is always true of Plato's dialogues, 1. This is a revised version of a paper presented in the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy at Brown University and read subsequently at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Questions from Martha Nussbaum, comments from Mary Whitlock Blundell, and a very useful letter from Michael Pakaluk led me to make some important changes in Section III. Mark Bedau and Jennifer Dellner helped me inprove an earlier version. 2. Translations of the Symposium are based on Nehamas A., and Woodruff P., 1989.
    [Show full text]