DOCSLIB.ORG

A Pageant Politicized the Rise of Intersectional Activism in 1968

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Pageant Politicized the Rise of Intersectional Activism in 1968 A PAgeAnt Politicized The Rise of Intersectional Activism in 1968 hAley cOrmier On September 7, 1968, the miSS AmericA PageAnt tOOk plAce in AtlAntic city, new JerSey, where it fAced twO diStinct cO-Occurring prOteStS. One wAS A SecOnd-wAve feminiSt demOnStrAtiOn thAt criticized the pAgeAnt fOr itS SexiSm And prOmOtiOn Of OppreS- Sive beAuty StAndArdS. the Other wAS miSS blAck AmericA, An All-blAck rivAl pAgeAnt whOSe OrgAnizerS cOndemned the inherent rAciSm Of the miSS AmericA inStitutiOn And puShed the lArger pAgeAnt tO integrAte. AlthOugh the miSS AmericA PageAnt wAS their cOmmOn tArget, the twO prOteStS—Women’S liberAtiOniSt And blAck nAtiOnAl- iSt—Occurred SepArAtely And hAd different goalS. under theSe circumStAnceS, newS- pAper cOverAge preSented the wOmen pArticipAting in the prOteSt AS AntAgOniStic tO eAch Other’S cAuSeS. in light Of further reSeArch, hOwever, thiS perceptiOn prOveS fAlSe. cOnSidering infOrmAtiOn Omitted frOm cOverAge Of the prOteStS And Armed with An underStAnding Of the erA’S JOurnAliStic cOnventiOnS, it AppeArS the femAle prOteStOrS in bOth demOnStrAtiOnS indeed SuppOrted eAch Other’S goalS, which in turn SuggeStS thAt rAdicAl feminiSm And blAck nAtiOnAliSm Of the lAte 1960S were mutuAlly SuppOrtive mOvementS. “Women’s liberation.” “The women’s movement.” “Sec- on their physical characteristics, which ultimately reduced ond-wave,” “radical” feminism. By any of these names, it women to farm animals), “The Unbeatable Madonna- was clear that a particular something came into being—or, Whore Combination” (the paradoxical necessity for more accurately, announced its being to the nation—on women to be both sexy and innocent in order to win social the boardwalk of Atlantic City, New Jersey on September 7, approval), and “The Irrelevant Crown of the Throne of 1968. This date marked the annual occurrence of the na- Mediocrity” (that only “unoffensive, bland ... [and] tionally-televised Miss America Pageant, which took place, apolitical” contestants could win the contest because they 44 in accordance with tradition, at Atlantic City’s Convention behaved how society believed women were “supposed to”). Hall. Little else, however, was traditional about the pag- The protestors—who would only speak to female eant’s circumstances that year: directly outside the venue, reporters—also wielded signs reading “Miss America Is a approximately one hundred women’s liberationists staged Big Falsie” and “Up Against the Wall, Miss America,” a groundbreaking, provocative protest of the Miss America crowned a live sheep winner of the pageant and paraded it Pageant, primarily condemning its sexist objectification of around the boardwalk, and chained themselves to a Miss women and its perpetuation of anti-feminist ideals. America dummy to portray what Morgan called women’s enslavement to “ludicrous ‘beauty’ standards.” The daylong demonstration was the foundational act of the Women’s Liberation Movement, and the protestors in- Although all of these activities were intentionally dramatic, volved were among the first to politicize and publicly chal- the event that by far generated the most publicity was the lenge the beloved Miss America institution. The very con- assembly of a “Freedom Trash Can” into which bras, cept of the protest was particularly audacious considering girdles, lipstick, false eyelashes, high-heeled shoes, copies how benign the pageant seemed to most Americans—it of Playboy and other symbols of oppressive beauty was, after all, the only program that Richard Nixon allowed standards were thrown. The protestors intended to draw a his daughters to stay up late to watch. Because the Ameri- comparison to the burning of draft cards by setting the can public generally saw the pageant as harmless all- items on fire—just as draft cards represented a restriction American entertainment, the protestors’ intense criticism of freedom, the various items in the Freedom Trash Can presented a rather shocking departure from the norm. It represented a restrictive standard of femininity. Local was this shock factor—combined with the purposely theat- ordinances ultimately prevented this symbolic burning, rical nature of the protest—that attracted the attention of but the media, having caught wind of the rumors, leapt at the mass media, whose print coverage launched the Wom- the opportunity for a scandalous story. Most reports on the en’s Liberation Movement into the public consciousness protest thus falsely claimed that “several of the women and affirmed its place amongst the various other move- publicly burned their brassieres,” thereby creating the ments of the late 1960s. Members of the New York Radical Women (NYRW), a second-wave feminist group established in 1967, arranged the seminal women’s liberation protest. One of the key organizers was Robin Morgan, a cofounder of the NYRW and author of the informational pamphlet “No More Miss America!” The brazenly-worded pamphlet contained an outline of the protestors’ objections to the Miss America Pageant, as well as an invitation for women “of every political persuasion” to join in a variety of “boardwalk- theater” activities in protest of the oppressive and unrepresentative image of Miss America, the nation’s supposed “ideal.” Morgan, who helped to distribute copies of the pamphlet to spectators on the boardwalk on the day of the event, presented the specific grievances of the women’s liberationists in the form of a ten-point list. Targets for protest included: “The Degrading Mindless- atlantiC City at night (Courtesy of wikimedia Boob-Girlie Symbol” (the evaluation of contestants based commons) ElEmEnts : : sPRInG 2017 “[T]he movement behind Miss Black America was black nationalism, which was more radical in nature than the Civil Rights Movement and often utilized separatist strategies.” 45 enduring stereotype of radical feminists as “misled” and crowned the contest’s winner. Like the women’s unreasonably bitter bra-burners. The final event of the day liberationists further down the boardwalk, the organizers occurred inside Convention Hall during the outgoing Miss of Miss Black America understood that press coverage America’s nationally-televised farewell speech, when would transmit their message to a wider audience, and several protestors began shouting as they unrolled a large thus had intentionally concocted a “newsworthy” event. banner reading “Women’s Liberation.” Although police The intriguing combination of pageant and protest proved quickly arrested two of the women and forcibly removed more than enough to attract the media, and in consequence the rest, the day’s final act of protest helped to facilitate the what Americans read in the morning paper was almost overnight transformation of the fledgling radical feminist unbelievable: the seemingly invulnerable, nationally- movement from essentially unknown to widely recognized. cherished Miss America Pageant had been challenged by not one, but two distinct protests. As evidenced by its exclusion from most 1960s historical literature I have come across and the limited amount of Before moving on, it is important to determine the greater scholarship I was able to find on the subject, few people social and political movements behind these concurrent today are aware that merely a few blocks from the women’s 1968 demonstrations. While women’s liberation was liberation demonstration, a second protest of the Miss clearly the larger movement behind the radical feminist America Pageant occurred on the evening of September 7, protest, less clarity surrounded the coordination of Miss 1968. This protest was the Miss Black America Pageant, Black America. According to press coverage from 1968, as an all-black answer to the blatantly racist Miss America well as several contemporary sources drawing from that Pageant, which had yet to produce a black finalist since its coverage, the National Association for the Advancement of founding in 1921 (and had even introduced an official rule Colored People (NAACP) was responsible for the organi- in the 1930s stating that “contestants must be of good zation of the protest. Such reports suggested to readers health and of the white race.”) that Miss Black America belonged under the umbrella of the Civil Rights Movement. Due to the rapid organization of Miss Black America, the architects of the protest recruited only a dozen participants On the contrary, recent scholarship by historian and femi- to compete in the talent, swimsuit, and evening-gown nist scholar Georgia Paige Welch has demonstrated that events held at the Ritz Carlton Hotel. The number of this was not the case. Welch consulted NAACP records in contestants was in any case secondary to the pageant’s the Library of Congress, and discovered correspondence goals, which were to force the Miss America Pageant to between local NAACP members and the executive director integrate (ironically through separatist tactics) and praise of the NAACP regarding the Miss America Pageant. The black beauty and culture in their own right, instead of records revealed that top NAACP officials considered the insisting upon their equality with Anglo-centric ideals. To pageant to be a trivial and local issue, and therefore did not emphasize this second point, the organizers of the event help to organize or even sanction the Miss Black America selected contestants with various skin tones and hair protest. It was instead devised by Phillip Savage and J. textures in order to demonstrate the diverse beauty of Morris Anderson, who were affiliated with the NAACP but black American women. Nineteen-year-old Philadelphian based in Philadelphia, a hotbed of black nationalism as op- Saundra Williams, who, according to The New York Times posed to liberal activism. Welch determined that it was not coverage, “[wore] her hair natural” and performed an the famous civil rights group but the radically-inclined in- African dance for the talent section of the competition, was dependent activists who were the driving force behind A PAgeAnt Politicized Miss Black America. Furthermore, the participants in the Bronx housewife” Bonnie Allen, who came across as con- rival pageant were exclusively black and competed in a fused and conflicted, “I’m for beauty contests.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Radical Feminist Manifesto As Generic Appropriation: Gender, Genre, and Second Wave Resistance
    Southern Journal of Communication ISSN: 1041-794X (Print) 1930-3203 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsjc20 The radical feminist manifesto as generic appropriation: Gender, genre, and second wave resistance Kimber Charles Pearce To cite this article: Kimber Charles Pearce (1999) The radical feminist manifesto as generic appropriation: Gender, genre, and second wave resistance, Southern Journal of Communication, 64:4, 307-315, DOI: 10.1080/10417949909373145 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949909373145 Published online: 01 Apr 2009. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 578 View related articles Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rsjc20 The Radical Feminist Manifesto as Generic Appropriation: Gender, Genre, And Second Wave Resistance Kimber Charles Pearce n June of 1968, self-styled feminist revolutionary Valerie Solanis discovered herself at the heart of a media spectacle after she shot pop artist Andy Warhol, whom she I accused of plagiarizing her ideas. While incarcerated for the attack, she penned the "S.C.U.M. Manifesto"—"The Society for Cutting Up Men." By doing so, Solanis appropriated the traditionally masculine manifesto genre, which had evolved from sov- ereign proclamations of the 1600s into a form of radical protest of the 1960s. Feminist appropriation of the manifesto genre can be traced as far back as the 1848 Seneca Falls Woman's Rights Convention, at which suffragists Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Coffin Mott, Martha Coffin, and Mary Ann McClintock parodied the Declara- tion of Independence with their "Declaration of Sentiments" (Campbell, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Controversies in the Women's and Lesbian/Gay Liberation Movements
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1985 Politics and pleasures : sexual controversies in the women's and lesbian/gay liberation movements. Lisa J. Orlando University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Orlando, Lisa J., "Politics and pleasures : sexual controversies in the women's and lesbian/gay liberation movements." (1985). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2489. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2489 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICS AND PLEASURES: SEXUAL CONTROVERSIES IN THE WOMEN'S AND LESBIAN/GAY LIBERATION MOVEMENTS A Thesis Presented By LISA J. ORLANDO Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS September 1985 Political Science Department Politics and Pleasures: Sexual Controversies in the Uomen's and Lesbian/Gay Liberation Movements" A MASTERS THESIS by Lisa J. Orlando Approved by: Sheldon Goldman, Member Philosophy \ hi (UV .CVvAj June 21, 19S4 Dean Alfange, Jj' Graduate P ogram Department of Political Science Lisa J. Orlando © 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 All Rights Reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following friends who, in long and often difficult discussion, helped me to work through the ideas presented in this thesis: John Levin, Sheila Walsh, Christine Di Stefano, Tom Keenan, Judy Butler, Adela Pinch, Gayle Rubin, Betsy Duren, Ellen Willis, Ellen Cantarow, and Pam Mitchell.
    [Show full text]
  • Shulamith Firestone 1945–2012 2
    Shulamith Firestone 1945–2012 2 Photograph courtesy of Lori Hiris. New York, 1997. Memorial for Shulamith Firestone St. Mark’s Church in the Bowery, Parish Hall September 23, 2012 Program 4:00–6:00 pm Laya Firestone Seghi Eileen Myles Kathie Sarachild Jo Freeman Ti-Grace Atkinson Marisa Figueiredo Tributes from: Anne Koedt Peggy Dobbins Bev Grant singing May the Work That I Have Done Speak For Me Kate Millett Linda Klein Roxanne Dunbar Robert Roth 3 Open floor for remembrances Lori Hiris singing Hallelujah Photograph courtesy of Lori Hiris. New York, 1997. Reception 6:00–6:30 4 Shulamith Firestone Achievements & Education Writer: 1997 Published Airless Spaces. Semiotexte Press 1997. 1970–1993 Published The Dialectic of Sex, Wm. Morrow, 1970, Bantam paperback, 1971. – Translated into over a dozen languages, including Japanese. – Reprinted over a dozen times up through Quill trade edition, 1993. – Contributed to numerous anthologies here and abroad. Editor: Edited the first feminist magazine in the U.S.: 1968 Notes from the First Year: Women’s Liberation 1969 Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation 1970 Consulting Editor: Notes from the Third Year: WL Organizer: 1961–3 Activist in early Civil Rights Movement, notably St. Louis c.o.r.e. (Congress on Racial Equality) 1967–70 Founder-member of Women’s Liberation Movement, notably New York Radical Women, Redstockings, and New York Radical Feminists. Visual Artist: 1978–80 As an artist for the Cultural Council Foundation’s c.e.t.a. Artists’ Project (the first government funded arts project since w.p.a.): – Taught art workshops at Arthur Kill State Prison For Men – Designed and executed solo-outdoor mural on the Lower East Side for City Arts Workshop – As artist-in-residence at Tompkins Square branch of the New York Public Library, developed visual history of the East Village in a historical mural project.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Faludi How Shulamith Firestone Shaped Feminism The
    AMERICAN CHRONICLES DEATH OF A REVOLUTIONARY Shulamith Firestone helped to create a new society. But she couldn’t live in it. by Susan Faludi APRIL 15, 2013 Print More Share Close Reddit Linked In Email StumbleUpon hen Shulamith Firestone’s body was found Wlate last August, in her studio apartment on the fifth floor of a tenement walkup on East Tenth Street, she had been dead for some days. She was sixty­seven, and she had battled schizophrenia for decades, surviving on public assistance. There was no food in the apartment, and one theory is that Firestone starved, though no autopsy was conducted, by preference of her Orthodox Jewish family. Such a solitary demise would have been unimaginable to anyone who knew Firestone in the late nineteen­sixties, when she was at the epicenter of the radical­feminist movement, Firestone, top left, in 1970, at the beach, surrounded by some of the same women who, a reading “The Second Sex”; center left, with month after her death, gathered in St. Mark’s Gloria Steinem, in 2000; and bottom right, Church In­the­Bowery, to pay their respects. in 1997. Best known for her writings, Firestone also launched the first major The memorial service verged on radical­ radical­feminist groups in the country, feminist revival. Women distributed flyers on which made headlines in the late nineteen­ consciousness­raising, and displayed copies of sixties and early seventies with confrontational protests and street theatre. texts published by the Redstockings, a New York group that Firestone co­founded. The WBAI radio host Fran Luck called for the Tenth Street studio to be named the Shulamith Firestone Memorial Apartment, and rented “in perpetuity” to “an older and meaningful feminist.” Kathie Sarachild, who had pioneered consciousness­raising and coined the slogan “Sisterhood Is Powerful,” in 1968, proposed convening a Shulamith Firestone Women’s Liberation Memorial Conference on What Is to Be Done.
    [Show full text]
  • GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought
    GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought Tuesday, Thursday 12-1.15 Fall Semester 2018 Professor Katrina Forrester Office Hours: Tuesday, Thursday 2-3 Office: CGIS K437 E-mail: [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Leah Downey E-mail: [email protected] Course Description: What is feminism? What is patriarchy? What and who is a woman? How does gender relate to sexuality, and to class and race? Should housework be waged, should sex be for sale, and should feminists trust the state? This course is an introduction to feminist political thought since the mid-twentieth century. It introduces students to classic texts of late twentieth-century feminism, explores the key arguments that have preoccupied radical, socialist, liberal, Black, postcolonial and queer feminists, examines how these arguments have changed over time, and asks how debates about equality, work, and identity matter today. We will proceed chronologically, reading texts mostly written during feminism’s so-called ‘second wave’, by a range of influential thinkers including Simone de Beauvoir, Shulamith Firestone, bell hooks and Catharine MacKinnon. We will examine how feminists theorized patriarchy, capitalism, labor, property and the state; the relationship of claims of sex, gender, race, and class; the development of contemporary ideas about sexuality, identity, and gender; and how and whether these ideas change how fundamental problems in political theory are understood. 1 Course Requirements: Participation (25%) includes (a) active participation in discussion (15%); and (b) weekly responses: each week you will send 2-3 brief questions/ comments about the reading to your TF by 5pm the day before section (10%) Paper 1 (25%) 5-6 pages due October 18 4pm.
    [Show full text]
  • "A Common Fate of Discrimination": Race-Gender Analogies in Legal and Historical Perspective
    "A Common Fate of Discrimination": Race-Gender Analogies in Legal and Historical Perspective Serena Mayeri In her classic work Ain't I a Woman, African-American feminist critic bell hooks excoriated white feminists for their "constant comparison[s] of the plight of 'women' and 'blacks,"'' charging that such analogies "support the exclusion of black women" 2 and represent the linguistic expression of a ' "sexist-racist attitude" endemic to the women's liberation movement. Hooks, writing in the early 1980s, perceived analogies between racial and sexual oppression-at least as articulated by white women who "used black people as metaphors" 4-as a quintessentially opportunistic, parasitic, and marginalizing practice. Two decades earlier, when civil rights attorney Pauli Murray, already a veteran of battles against racial and sexual exclusion, was searching for a means of persuading skeptics that the eradication of "Jane Crow" deserved moral commitment and legal mobilization equivalent to the fight against "Jim Crow," she had emphasized the "strikingly similar positions in American society" of "women and Negroes." 5 Invoking the "parallel and interrelated" histories of women's rights and civil rights movements, Murray articulated an analogy that superficially resembled the very comparison hooks would later condemn. Powerful political and legal imperatives shaped Murray's decision to invoke an analogy between race and sex in the early 1960s. In so doing, she deliberately and self-consciously adopted a long tradition within feminist advocacy traceable to the genesis of the antebellum woman's rights struggle I. BELL HOOKS, AIN'T I A WOMAN 141 (1981). 2. Id. at 140. 3. Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Liberation: Seeing the Revolution Clearly
    Sara M. EvanS Women’s Liberation: Seeing the Revolution Clearly Approximately fifty members of the five Chicago radical women’s groups met on Saturday, May 18, 1968, to hold a citywide conference. The main purposes of the conference were to create and strengthen ties among groups and individuals, to generate a heightened sense of common history and purpose, and to provoke imaginative pro- grammatic ideas and plans. In other words, the conference was an early step in the process of movement building. —Voice of Women’s Liberation Movement, June 19681 EvEry account of thE rE-EmErgEncE of feminism in the United States in the late twentieth century notes the ferment that took place in 1967 and 1968. The five groups meeting in Chicago in May 1968 had, for instance, flowered from what had been a single Chicago group just a year before. By the time of the conference in 1968, activists who used the term “women’s liberation” understood themselves to be building a movement. Embedded in national networks of student, civil rights, and antiwar movements, these activists were aware that sister women’s liber- ation groups were rapidly forming across the country. Yet despite some 1. Sarah Boyte (now Sara M. Evans, the author of this article), “from Chicago,” Voice of the Women’s Liberation Movement, June 1968, p. 7. I am grateful to Elizabeth Faue for serendipitously sending this document from the first newsletter of the women’s liberation movement created by Jo Freeman. 138 Feminist Studies 41, no. 1. © 2015 by Feminist Studies, Inc. Sara M. Evans 139 early work, including my own, the particular formation calling itself the women’s liberation movement has not been the focus of most scholar- ship on late twentieth-century feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • In 1968 Feminists Targeted the Miss America Pageant for Protest. They
    People & Events: The 1968 Protest In 1968 feminists targeted the Miss America Pageant for protest. They staged a theatrical demonstration outside of the Atlantic City Convention Center on the day of the pageant. The protest was one of the first media events to bring national attention to the emerging Women's Liberation Movement. Over the next decade, the women's movement would rival the civil rights movement in the success it would achieve in a short period of time. 1968 was a year of great upheaval in the United States. It was a year of shocking events, including the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy. The country also was in the midst of the Vietnam War , which caused great internal division in the country. The violent antiwar demonstrations at the Chicago Democratic National Convention that year offered evidence of how divided the country was. The pageant protest was organized by the New York Radical Women (N.Y.R.W.), a group of women who had been active in the civil rights, the New Left, and the antiwar movements. Their experiences in those movements had offered them conflicting messages. As organizers and civil rights activists they were dedicated to working for freedom, yet these organizations were also plagued with their own sexism towards women. Women volunteers, for example, who came to work in the South during the Freedom Summer voter registration project in 1964, were automatically expected to cook and clean in the houses where volunteers lived. Among the first groups to press for a separate women's rights movement was the N.Y.R.W.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did the 1968 Miss America Pageant Protests
    1 Kylie Garrett Dr. Hyde HIST 1493 7 November 2018 Topic statement: How did the 1968 Miss America Pageant protests exemplify the values of women during this time period, and how did the feminist movement affect other civil rights movements at the time? Protesting Miss America “The 4-H club county fair, [a place] where the nervous animals are judged for teeth, fleece, etc., and where the best ‘specimen’ gets the blue ribbon.”1 This was the metaphor published in the New York Free Press by the Women’s Liberation Movement describing the ​ ​ Miss America Pageant in 1968. The Miss America protests were used by women as a way to gain acceptance and support for women’s equality. The women of the Women’s Liberation Movement felt that the Miss America Pageant was sexist, racist, and held women to an unrealistic beauty standard. National media coverage allowed women to exemplify their values of equality, opportunity, and natural beauty, and launched the beginning of the feminist movement we know today. Because of the success women attained during this time period, other civil rights movements were encouraged to continue their fight and achieve a success of their own. The Miss America Pageant was created as a way to reflect the gradual successes women were having in the United States by expanding both their political and social rights. In Atlantic 1 Women’s Liberation, “No More Miss America,” New York Free Press, September 5, 1968. ​ ​ ​ 2 City in 1921, several businessmen put on an event titled “Fall Frolic” in order to lure vacationers into their area and increase their personal revenue.2 This pageant-like show demonstrated women’s “professional beauties, civic beauties and inter-city beauties,” and became a huge success as the event grew larger and more popular each year.3 The newspapers and media at the time portrayed these new pageants as popularity contests and began to enter in contestants of their own in order to increase awareness and popularity for their personal benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Toolkit Gloria
    TOOLKITTOOLKIT Artwork: Farver TOOLKIT 2019/20 Season The Off-Broadway cast ofGloria: A Life Photo: Ahron R. Foster Ahron Photo: Welcome! This Toolkit contains resources to accompany Gloria: A Life, a new play by Emily Mann, which runs at the American Repertory Theater January-March, 2020. This play is about Gloria Steinem and the women she has partnered with in a decades-long fight for equality. Fifty years after Gloria began raising her voice and championing those of others, her vision is as urgent as ever. The first act is Gloria’s story; the second act, in which the audience participates in a talking circle, is our own. Gloria believes that these talking circles serve as a catalyst for change offering us all a path forward. Everyone in the audience is invited to speak their truth about the stories that they heard and how they resonated with their own experiences. Inside this Toolkit, you will find materials on the development and context of Gloria: A Life, including insights from the playwright and an overview of the play; information about the Women’s Rights Movement in the United States and Gloria Steinem’s role in it; and more on social movements today. The articles, resources, and activities in this Toolkit are curated for the use of learners of all ages, in and out of the classroom, who are looking to take a deeper dive into Gloria: A Life. BRENNA NICELY ALEXANDRA DANIELS Education & Engagement Education Apprentice Director JULIA SCHACHNIK Community Engagement Apprentice GLORIA: A LIFE TOOLKIT 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • The Montag Vlume 7
    The Montag The College of Liberal Arts Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume VII Editor-in-Chief Sidney Thomas Section Editors Claire Carlson Schaller Desart Paul Periolat Faculty Consultants Daniel Enrique Pérez Bretton Rodríguez PublishedbytheUniversity of Nevada, Reno Sponsored by the Core Humanities Program, College of Liberal Arts April 2018, Reno, Nevada 1 Supported by the College of Liberal Arts and the Core Humanities Program at the University of Nevada, Reno, The Montag seeks to publish accessibly written, high quality work by undergraduate students that showcases the value of a liberal arts education and thoughtfully engages with the issues confronting humanity in the twenty-first century. The journal is edited and produced by an undergraduate editorial staff and published in the spring semester of each academic year. Those interested in working for The Montag should visit: unr.edu/core-humanities/the-montag Submissions to The Montag are accepted throughout the year. To submit to The Montag: - Please send your submission via email to [email protected]. The subject of the email should read “NAME-TITLE.” - The format of the submission should be Microsoft Word format, 12-point font, Times New Roman - Citations should be formatted in the accepted professional format of the related field. Submissions can be essays, poetry, plays, Short stories, artwork, photographs, musical scores, translations. If the submission exceeds twenty pages, its likelihood of being published diminishes. Additionally, if your submission to the journal
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Studies Newsletter March 1979 Women's Studies
    Denison University Denison Digital Commons Looking Back, Looking Forward Women's and Gender Studies Spring 1979 Women's Studies Newsletter March 1979 Women's Studies Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/lookingback Recommended Citation Women's Studies, "Women's Studies Newsletter March 1979" (1979). Looking Back, Looking Forward. 158. http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/lookingback/158 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Women's and Gender Studies at Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Looking Back, Looking Forward by an authorized administrator of Denison Digital Commons. women's studies newsletter March, 1979 Volume 4, No. 3 DENISON WOMEN'S WEEK: March 4-10 This year Women's Week, Denison's annual celebration of the achievements and potential of Its women's community, will be held from March 4 through March 10. Nancy Cable and Julie Panchura, Dean of Students' Office, and Nancy Nowik, Women's Coordinator., have worked together this year to draw particular atten- tion to the need for creative support for women by all members of the Denison community. Schedule for Women's Week Sunday, March 4 — Women in Power: A seminar featuring student presentations: 1) The Earnings Gap: A Brief Description of Where Women Are in the Work Force 2) The Sociological Perspective on Jobs for Women 3) Women in Power—Members of the J-Term group that went to Washington, D.C. to interview women in high positions 4) Plus Judy Clementson-Mohr, Clinical Psychologist, on job satisfaction Curtis West Lounge, 3:00-5:00 Faculty invited to remain for SAGA dinner Monday, March 5 — GLCA Visiting Scholar Florence Howe gives her convocation speech, "Myths of Coeducation," in Slayter Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
    [Show full text]