DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Versus General History in Old Hittite Historiography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Versus General History in Old Hittite Historiography LOCAL VERSUS GENERAL HISTORY IN OLD HITTITE HISTORIOGRAPHY Alexander Uchitel Several definitions of 'historiography' are currently in use. According to a minimalist approach, only followers of the Greek concept of historia, that is, a rational historical research, are credited with this title. A maximalist definition, on the contrary, includes any narrative dealing with past events, regardless of its original purpose. A compro­ mise view which treats as 'historiography' proper only those composi­ tions whose purpose is purely historical, without any indication of some other more practical aim, will be adopted in the present study. Hittites are often credited as those who 'invented' the genre of historiography in this last sense. 1 Indeed, the earliest known com­ position bearing a title 'Tablet of Manly Deeds' (DUB LV-na-an-na­ af)2 was written already during the reign of Hattusili I, one of the early kings of the Hittite Old Kingdom period, in the 17th century. In contrast to the later Assyrian royal annals which preserved their original connection to royal building inscriptions in the form of the so-called Baubericht (an account of royal building activity, written as a postscript), this Hittite genre of 'manly deeds' (pesnatar), conven­ tionally also called 'royal annals,' shows no signs of any purpose other than recording the past events. The realization that the Hittite version of the annals of Hattusili I was originally inscribed upon the king's golden statue dedicated to the Sun-goddess of Arinna3 did not transform this text into a 'votive inscription,' thereby revealing its true purpose. Royal annals or their parts could be inscribed upon statues. later without any change in identification of their genre, such as the annals of Tuthaliya IV (13th century), which were also orig­ inally inscribed upon the king's statue.4 1 Gi.iterbock ( 1983) 21-35. 2 CTH 4. Critical edition with Italian translation: lmparati and Saporetti (1965) 40-85; English translation: Kuhrt (1995) 241-2; Russian: Ivanov (1977) 66-70; Hebrew: Kempinski ( 1980) 13-20. 3 See Otten ( 1968) 11 I . i Gi.iterbock (I 967) I 39-56. All dates are BCE. 56 ALEXANDER UCHITEL The origins of this genre are disputed. On the one hand, an ear­ lier historical inscription of Anitta5 was proposed as a possible pro­ totype of Hittite royal annals; on the other hand, the existence of an Akkadian version of the annals of Hattusili I seems to point to­ wards some Mesopotamian prototype. Both views are problematic. Anitta's text is clearly a building inscription, as is evident from the text itself: 'These words [I put] on my gate with a tablet' (I. 33). Although no genuine Hittite monumental inscription written in a cuneiform script has ever been found, this genre of real or fictitious building inscriptions continued to exist during the Old Hittite period alongside the genre of royal annals, being represented by such texts as an account of the campaigns of Mursili I (including the famous sack of Babylon) written by his successor, Hantili 1. 6 Like Anitta's text, this is a clay tablet bearing clearly recognizable signs of a build­ ing inscription, i.e., an account of royal building activity and a curse against erasing the inscription (II. 12-15). Several Old Assyrian and Syrian historical texts proposed by H. Tadmor as possible alternative prototypes of Hattusili l's annals are building inscriptions as well. 7 Some of them could serve as a prototype of Anitta's inscription, especially an inscription of Zimri­ Lim, king of Mari,8 a clay tablet claiming to be a monumental inscription. However, as Giiterbock has pointed out,9 it is irrelevant for the problem of the genre's origin whether Hattusili's scribes were inspired by these inscriptions or by Anitta's text, because in either case the radical break with the building inscriptions' tradition should be assumed as taking place during Hattusili's reign. This assumption, however, faces another difficulty: if the 'inven­ tion' of a new genre of 'manly deeds' is attributed to Hattusili I, it should also be assumed that it was 'invented' simultaneously in two languages, Hittite and Akkadian. The most disturbing consequence of this presumption is the use of two different expressions, which cannot be regarded as exact translations of each other, for the intro- 5 cm I. Critical edition with German translation: Neu (1974); English: Gtiterbock (1983) 23-4; Russian: Ivanov (1977) 37-9; Hebrew: Kempinski (1980) 4-6. 6 cm 11. Transliteration with a partial German translation: Forrer ( 1926) II. 20, IO; Hebrew: Kempinski ( 1980) 45-6. 7 Tadmor (1977) 213. 8 Dossin (1971) 1-6. " Gtiterbock ( 1983) 26. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hanigalbat and the Land Hani
    Arnhem (nl) 2015 – 3 Anatolia in the bronze age. © Joost Blasweiler student Leiden University - [email protected] Hanigal9bat and the land Hana. From the annals of Hattusili I we know that in his 3rd year the Hurrian enemy attacked his kingdom. Thanks to the text of Hattusili I (“ruler of Kussara and (who) reign the city of Hattusa”) we can be certain that c. 60 years after the abandonment of the city of Kanesh, Hurrian armies extensively entered the kingdom of Hatti. Remarkable is that Hattusili mentioned that it was not a king or a kingdom who had attacked, but had used an expression “the Hurrian enemy”. Which might point that formerly attacks, raids or wars with Hurrians armies were known by Hattusili king of Kussara. And therefore the threatening expression had arisen in Hittite: “the Hurrian enemy”. Translation of Gary Beckman 2008, The Ancient Near East, editor Mark W. Chavalas, 220. The cuneiform texts of the annal are bilingual: Babylonian and Nesili (Hittite). Note: 16. Babylonian text: ‘the enemy from Ḫanikalbat entered my land’. The Babylonian text of the bilingual is more specific: “the enemy of Ḫanigal9 bat”. Therefore the scholar N.B. Jankowska1 thought that apparently the Hurrian kingdom Hanigalbat had existed probably from an earlier date before the reign of Hattusili i.e. before c. 1650 BC. Normally with the term Mittani one is pointing to the mighty Hurrian kingdom of the 15th century BC 2. Ignace J. Gelb reported 3 on “the dragomans of the Habigalbatian soldiers/workers” in an Old Babylonian tablet of Amisaduqa, who was a contemporary with Hattusili I.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation Count in Hittite Chronology 73
    071_080.qxd 13.02.2004 11:54 Seite 71 G E N E R A T I O N C O U N T I N H I T T I T E C H R O N O L O G Y Gernot Wilhelm* In studies on Ancient Near Eastern chronology of three participants who voted for the high Hittite history has often been considered a corner- chronology without hesitation (ÅSTRÖM 1989: 76). stone of a long chronology. In his grandiose but – At a colloquium organized by advocates of an as we now see – futile attempt to denounce the ultra-low chronology at Ghent, another hittitolo- Assyrian Kinglist as a historically unreliable source gist, B ECKMAN 2000: 25, deviated from the main- for the Assyrian history of the first half of the 2nd stream by declaring that from his viewpoint, “the millennium B.C., L ANDSBERGER 1954: 50 only Middle Chronology best fits the evidence, although briefly commented on Hittite history. 1 A. Goetze, the High Chronology would also be possible”. however, who at that time had already repeatedly Those hittitologists who adhered to the low defended a long chronology against the claims of chronology (which means, sack of Babylon by the followers of the short chronology (GOETZE Mursili I: 1531) had to solve the problem of 1951, 1952), filled the gap and supported Lands- squeezing all the kings attested between Mursili I berger’s plea for a long chronology, though not as and Suppiluliuma I into appr. 150 years, provided excessively long as Landsberger considered to be that there was agreement on Suppiluliuma’s likely.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Rise of the Hittites
    2/5/2012 Lecture 5: The Hittites HIST 332 Spring 2012 Physical Geography Rugged Mountains granite timber copper silver iron grasslands grazing horses barley and grapes harsh winters limited campaign season Natural Resources of Anatolia: CU, FE, AG The Hittites (1900-1200) Indo-European people – migrated from the N. shore of the Black Sea ~2500 1900 established in Anatolia 1500 society developed Feudal society – placing ethnic Hatti over local population – order based on land holdings (fiefdoms) – council of powerful families “Great Family” held highest offices – military command based on blood-kin – officer corps, professional army expanded as Hittites expanded into Syria and Upper Euphrates Capital at Hattusas 1 2/5/2012 Hittite Chronology 7000-1700 BCE Pre-Kingdom • Indo-European Migrations – Mysterious Origins 1700-1500 BCE Old Kingdom – Hattusilis I – Edict of Telipinus – Mursilis I sacks Babylon (1595 BCE) 1500-1400 BCE Middle Kingdom – Civil War • 1400-1180 BCE New Kingdom (Empire) – Suppiluliumas I – Muwatallis II • Battle of Qadesh (Kadesh) 1274 BCE After 1180 Collapse Hittite Old Kingdom • Hattusili I (1650-1620 BCE) • son of Labarna • successful general • Record of his military exploits – Annals of Hattusili – Palace Chronicles – Edict of Telipinu Hittite Sack of Babylon (1595 BCE) • Mursili I (1620-1590 BCE) – grandson of Hattusha Hattusili • campaigned against Halap Halap, the Hurrians Syria and Babylon – sacked Babylon Babylon (1595 BCE) (1595 BCE) • upon his victorious return to Hattusha, was killed by brother –in-law – cup bearer who marries Mursili’s sister 2 2/5/2012 Social Organization Feudal • 2 classes of fief holders – liegeman – “man of the weapon” • received land for service but reverted back to king after death • constant family struggles for authority Hittite The language is attested in cuneiform, in records from as early as the 20th century BCE down to the 12th century BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KINGDOM of the HITTITES This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Kingdom of the Hittites
    THE KINGDOM OF THE HITTITES This page intentionally left blank The Kingdom of the Hittites New Edition TREVOR BRYCE 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Trevor Bryce 2005 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Cruciform Seal' from Bogazköy-Hattusa
    ALi M. DIN<;OL - BELK IS DiN<;OL - J. DAVID HA WKI S - GERNOT WILHELM The 'Cruciform Seal' from Bogazköy-Hattusa Tafel6 l TRODUCTION Thc four authors of this contribution have been friends and colleagues of Peter Neve for many years, and have collaborated with the Bogazköy Expedition in the work on epigraphic material. Peter Neve opened the extraordinarily productive excavations of the Upper City at Hattusa, and has conducted thcm with the most gratifying resu!ts. It thus scemed to us that a joint presentation of our combined efforts on one of the most important finds of these excavations would be an appropriate means of affering to him, on the occasion of his65th birthday, our high regards and gratitude for his achievements. In 1986 Peter Neve reexcavating Temple 3 at Bogazköy found among other epigraphic 1 material some !arge clay lumps bearing remarkable seal impressions • These he deduced from impressions on their reverse sides to be sealings for containers or possibly for door fastenings. They almost all came from the lang ro"om 8 on the north-east side of Temple 3, and were found in a Ievel bclow that of the original floor immediatcly above a layer of yellow filling ! . Neve idcntified this as secondarily deposited building detritus and considered that the sealings would Apart from the usual abbreviations uscd by thc Arcbäologische Bibliographie and the Arcbäologrscher Anzeiger, we note thc following: ChS Corpus der hurririschen Sprachdenkmäler CTH E. Laroche, Catalogue des textes hittites ( 1970) HH E. Laroche, Lcs hicroglrphes hirrircs ( 1960) Kammenhuber, A. Kammenbuber, Orakelpraxis, Träume und Vorzeichenschau bei den Hethitern, THcth 7 (1976) Orakelpraxis KBo Keilschrifttexte aus ßoghazköi KUB Keilschrifturkunden aus ßoghazköi Orten, H .
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL HITTITE INSTRUCTIONS and RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE TEXTS Writings from the Ancient World
    ROYAL HITTITE INSTRUCTIONS AND RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE TEXTS Writings from the Ancient World Theodore J. Lewis, General Editor Associate Editors Billie Jean Collins Daniel Fleming Martti Nissinen William Schniedewind Mark S. Smith Emily Teeter Terry Wilfong Number 31 Royal Hittite Instructions and Related Administrative Texts ROYAL HITTITE INSTRUCTIONS AND RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE TEXTS by Jared L. Miller Edited by Mauro Giorgieri Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta ROYAL HITTITE INSTRUCTIONS AND RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE TEXTS Copyright 2013 by the Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Royal Hittite instructions and related administrative texts / edited by Jared L. Miller. pages cm. — (Writings from the ancient world / Society of Biblical Literature ; Number 33) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58983-769-0 (hardcover binding : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983-656-3 (paper binding : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983-657-0 (electronic format) 1. Hittites—Rites and ceremonies—Sources. 2. Hittites—Kings and rulers—Sources. 3. Oaths—Middle East. 4. Hittite language—Texts. 5. Inscriptions, Hittite. I. Miller, Jared L., author, editor. DS66.R69 2013 939'.3—dc23 2013004122 Printed on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997) and ISO 9706:1994 standards for paper permanence.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Dating of Enuma Elish
    Studia Antiqua Volume 9 Number 1 Article 5 April 2011 Give Me Back My Idol: Investigating the Dating of Enuma Elish E. Odin Yingling Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua Part of the History Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Yingling, E. O. "Give Me Back My Idol: Investigating the Dating of Enuma Elish." Studia Antiqua 9, no. 1 (2011). https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studia Antiqua by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Give ME Back MY Idol: Investigating THE Dating OF ENUMA ELISH E. Odin Yingling E. Odin Yingling is an ancient Near Eastern studies major, with an emphasis in the Greek New Testament. n December 3, 1872, George Smith announced the discovery of cu- neiform tablets that contained 1,100 poetic lines scholars called “The BabylonianO Epic of Creation.”1 However, the Babylonians and Assyrians knew the poem as Enuma elish (“When above”).2 Sir Austin Henry Layard initially located four tablets in the library of Ashurbanipal (668–626 b.c.e.).3 Later, the tablets were brought to the British Museum and translated by Smith in 1876. The subsequent publication would cause decades of theological battle and were known as the “Babel-Bible controversy.”4 Parallels between the two creation stories and their implications fueled the debate. The controversy propelled subsequent archaeological digs, which unearthed many more tablets.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Change in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern World: a Study of Interactions Between the Egyptian Empire and Its Neighbors
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship 2015 Cultural Change in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern World: A Study of Interactions between the Egyptian Empire and its Neighbors Benjamin Rideout University of New Hampshire - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/honors Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Rideout, Benjamin, "Cultural Change in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern World: A Study of Interactions between the Egyptian Empire and its Neighbors" (2015). Honors Theses and Capstones. 315. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/315 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cultural Change in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern World: A Study of Interactions between the Egyptian Empire and its Neighbors Benjamin Rideout, Author Dr. Meghan C. L. Howey, Advisor Dr. Eleanor Harrison-Buck, Secondary Advisor Senior Thesis, Spring 2015 University of New Hampshire College of Liberal Arts Anthropology Department 2 Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction Pg. 3 Chapter II: Theory of Cultural Interaction and its Effects Pg. 9 Chapter III: The Ancient Near East in the Late Bronze Age Pg. 19 Chapter IV: History of the Cultural Contacts of the Egyptian Empire in the Ancient Near East Pg. 29 Chapter V: Trade and Cultural Exchange Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetry and War Among the Hittites Mark Weeden
    CHAPTER 3 Poetry and War among the Hittites Mark Weeden WHO WERE THE HITTITES? During the nineteenth century European visitors to central Anatolia came upon the ruins of a large ancient city near the village of Bo!azköy, modern-day Bo!azkale. Already during the initial period of investigation that ensued over the next 50 years, links were made with Iron Age (first millennium bc) inscriptions in an as yet undeciphered hieroglyphic script that were known from northern Syria, and the people known to readers of the Hebrew Bible as the Hittites. As it turned out, these indirectly related phenomena were separated by several hundred years from the Late Bronze Age (c.1600–1200 bc) civilisation that had its seat at Bo!azköy.1 At the beginning of the twentieth century joint German and Turkish exca- vations at this site brought to light thousands of clay tablets inscribed with the cuneiform script, many in Akkadian, the lingua franca of the Ancient Near East in the Late Bronze Age, but many others in a language that bore resemblance to an Indo-European dialect already known from two letters found in the cuneiform archive from Amarna, Egypt. The Akkadian docu- ments, especially treaties with the great powers of the time, soon made it clear that this was the ancient city of Hattusa, capital of the Hittite Empire. By 1917 the language, known to its speakers as Nesili (the language of Nesa), was officially deciphered and became known to the modern world as Hittite, the oldest attested member of the Indo-European language family.2 Excavations continue at the site to this day, and the number of cuneiform tablets and fragments recovered thus far amounts to some 30,0003.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7: the Hittites and the Battle of Kadesh
    2/14/2012 Lecture 8: The Hittites, Kassites and Hurrians HIST 213 Spring 2012 Physical Geography Rugged Mountains granite timber copper silver iron grasslands grazing horses barley and grapes harsh winters limited campaign season Natural Resources of Anatolia: CU, FE, AG The Hittites (1900-1200) Indo-European people – migrated from the N. shore of the Black Sea ~2500 1900 established in Anatolia 1500 society developed Feudal society – placing ethnic Hatti over local population – order based on land holdings (fiefdoms) – council of powerful families “Great Family” held highest offices – military command based on blood-kin – officer corps, professional army expanded as Hittites expanded into Syria and Upper Euphrates Capital at Hattusas 1 2/14/2012 Hittite Chronology 7000-1700 BCE Pre-Kingdom • Indo-European Migrations – Mysterious Origins 1700-1500 BCE Old Kingdom – Hattusilis I – Edict of Telipinus – Mursilis I sacks Babylon (1595 BCE) 1500-1400 BCE Middle Kingdom – Civil War • 1400-1180 BCE New Kingdom (Empire) – Suppiluliumas I – Muwatallis II • Battle of Qadesh (Kadesh) 1274 BCE After 1180 Collapse Hittite: Indo-European The language is attested in cuneiform, in records from as early as the 20th century BCE down to the 12th century BCE. Thousands of tablets found at Bogazköy Attested Hittite Cities 2 2/14/2012 Hittite Old Kingdom • Labarna I (-1680-1650 BCE) – “the powerful” • conquered the core of Hittite territory • early history remains obscure • constant war wit the Arzawa in the west Hittite Old Kingdom • Hattusili I (1650-1620
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Hittite Imperial Landscapes: Territoriality and Balance of Power in South-Central Anatolia During the Late Bronze
    Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 2016; 3(2): 117–162 Alvise Matessi* The Making of Hittite Imperial Landscapes: Territoriality and Balance of Power in South-Central Anatolia during the Late Bronze Age https://doi.org/10.1515/janeh-2017-0004 Abstract: Aim of the present work is to offer an understanding of the mechanisms informing the making and reproduction of the Hittite Empire (17th-13th BCE) in its diachronic evolution. The analysis focuses on South-Central Anatolia, an area of intense core-periphery interactions within the scope of the Hittite domain and, therefore, of great informative potential about the manifold trajectories of imperial action. Through the combinatory investigation of archaeological and textual data able to account for long- to short-term variables of social change, I will show that South-Central Anatolia evolved from being a loose agglomerate of city-hinterland nuclei into a provincial system. The region thus acquired a pivotal role in the balance of power thanks to its centrality in the communication network, and it became the stage for eventful political revolutions, as well as a new core for Hittite political dynamics. The picture of Hittite imperialism emerging, thus, is that of a set of multi-causal and multi-directional processes, not predicated on the sole centri- fugal hegemonic expansion of the empire. Keywords: imperialism, political landscapes, territoriality, mobility, Hittite history and archaeology 1 Political geographies of the Hittite Empire Hittite history spans the entire Late Bronze Age in Anatolia, covering approxi- mately four and a half centuries (ca. 1650–1200 BCE). At the beginning of this period, the Hittite state emerged in North-Central Anatolia, in the bend of the Kızıl Irmak, from a mosaic of canton polities occupying the area during the Middle Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21 Kizzuwatna and the Euphrates States: Kummaha, Elbistan, Malatya Philology J. David Hawkins and Mark Weeden SOAS
    Chapter 21 Kizzuwatna and the Euphrates States: Kummaha, Elbistan, Malatya Philology J. David Hawkins and Mark Weeden SOAS, University of London 1. Introduction Kizzuwatna is defined in a Middle Hittite letter from Maşathöyük as a “primary watchpost”, a border region, which the writer of the letter explains is just as exposed as Zikkasta in the area of Maşat itself.1 Kizzuwatna itself had only been annexed to the Hittite power-sphere since the reign of Tudhaliya I in the mid 15th century BC as outlined in the treaty with Sunassura.2 Prior to this it had been subject to Hurrian overlordship, with a basically Syrian geo-political orientation.3 Hittite access to Syria is one of the key themes associated with the area of Kizzuwatna. One traditional assumption has been that this passed through the Cilician Gates into Plain Cilicia and then over one of the Amanus passes into Syria. Cogent objections have been made to this view, especially when it involves the passage of armies through difficult terrain involving precarious passes.4 Where exactly its borders lay and where its main cities are to be located have remained problematic issues, although considerable advances have been made in the last 15 years. The identity of the city/land of Kummanni and the city/land of Kizzuwatna was observed early on, as they alternate as readings in duplicate manuscripts of the same texts as well as in the titles of identical people or gods.5 This, along with an alleged textual association of Kizzuwatna with iron on the one hand and the coast on the other, led to an early identification of Kizzuwatna with Comana Pontica on the Black Sea coast.
    [Show full text]