DOCSLIB.ORG

09-Sudhir-Kumar-Sharma-..Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Applications, Volume IX, Issue-II February 2015 www.ijcea.com ISSN 2321-3469 iOS: The World’s Most Advanced And Powerful Operating System in Its Most Advanced Form Vs. Android: The World's Most Popular Mobile Platform Sudhir Kumar Sharma1, Nidhi Goyal2, Anu Chawla3 1,2,3 Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Post Graduate Govt. College for Girls, Sec-42, Chandigarh ABSTRACT: In the domain of 21st century, mobile technology has revolutionized the user phenomenon of anytime, anywhere mobility opportunity and enables the users to enjoy with numerous flavors of apps. Now days, most of the smartphones users are using smart applications in the world. The backbone for this uprising is the operating system on which these applications run. There are various mobile operating systems available. Apple's iOS and Google's Android are operating systems, which are used predominantly in this mobile realm. This paper discusses and compares Apple iOS and Android mobile OS, advantages, on the basis of their platform and performance in the mobile technology. Keywords: Apple iOS, Android, Mobile Technology, Operating System and Smartphones. [1] INTRODUCTION Wireless communication has ascended as one of the fastest spreading channels on the globe. This innovative wave is fueling an embryonic mobile culture that communicates as much with thumbs as it does with tongues. The usual cell phone has changed into the smartphone with so numerous features and functions that we may actually use it very minute as an actual mobile. Today's smart mobile phone devices are multi-functional devices capable of holding an inclusive variety of applications for both business and user with internet connectivity. Today, smartphones serves as a music player, a digital HD camera and video player, a GPS device, real-time gaming experience, a call recorder, an email center and more advanced apps like social networking that keeps track of everyone. Like a computer OS, a mobile operating system is the software platform that governs the functions and features available on your device, such as, refined 3D desktop, a virtual keyboard with multi-lingual language options, wireless connectivity, security, synchronization, privacy settings and many more. Some of the most common and well-known mobile operating systems are Apple’s iOS, Google’s Android, Microsoft's Windows Phone 8, RIM's BlackBerry OS and Bada. Because of the eminence, we will discuss about Apple’s iOS and Google’s Android operating system which are commonly seen in the realm of mobile. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Nidhi Goyal and Anu Chawla 165 International Journal of Computer Engineering and Applications, Volume IX, Issue-II February 2015 www.ijcea.com ISSN 2321-3469 [2] SMARTPHONES A smartphone is based on highly advanced features and an operating system that permits to run productivity apps. Assortment of smartphones like tablets, mobiles, PDAs, ipads have emerged in the telecom industry amalgamated with user friendly services. An effectual smartphone is expected to have: Mobile Network Capability. Touchscreen. More powerful CPU. Efficient RAM & supreme storage capacity. Wireless Communication connectivity like 3G, 4G or 5G. Web Surfing and E-mail. GPS etc. [3] MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEM: BACKBONE FOR SMARTPHONES 21st century’s smartphones are powered by multi-functional and robust operating systems, which make them a hand held tool for day to day activities, on the move. A mobile operating system, such as the BlackBerry OS, Apple’s iOS, Google’s Android, Microsoft Windows and many more, is a system software that allows telecommunication devices to run their apps and programs simultaneously with easy, comfort and with affluence way. [3.1] APPLE’S iOS: POWERFUL FOUNDATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY iOS, was earlier known as iPhone OS. Apple revolutionised its iPhone with capacitive touch abilities, making the complete experience of a smartphone for the generation of 21st era. iOS formerly developed for the iphone, and now can also support other Apple`s devices such as iPad, Apple TV and iPod touch. It offers stylish and instinctive interface with astonishing features and security at its core that engages its users all the time in its simplest way even while on the move. The marvelous feature of iOS is its variety of apps that are available in the app store. It offers: Simple-yet-beautiful Home screen. Millions of Apps available at App store. Multitasking. Real time gaming experience. Provision of iCloud technology. Update latest features. Switch between number of languages that are available on the virtual keyboard and last very important. Provision of unlocking iPhone or iPad by the Touch ID sensor that reads fingerprint and unlocks the device. “Find my iphone” to locate all Apple Devices.[1] [3.2] GOOGLE’S ANDROID: THE BEST OF GOOGLE BUILT IN Android is the operating system that reins more than one billion smartphones and tablets in the world of Smart mobile phones. It was initially developed by Android Inc. and now Google has taken it over. Android is an Open Source Platform supported by an extensive range of mobile device manufacturer. As a mobile platform, Android has full-grown fame among hardware manufacturers and the public alike in recent eons. By this fame and popularity, software developers create apps for Android smartphones that are available in play store without undergoing review and approval and can also be downloaded from other sites. It offers: World-class platform for creating apps and games available over million at Google play store. Open Handset Alliance that fit the common man budget. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Nidhi Goyal and Anu Chawla 166 International Journal of Computer Engineering and Applications, Volume IX, Issue-II February 2015 www.ijcea.com ISSN 2321-3469 Multi-window multi-task feature. Support for all Google Services and also access to third party apps. Supports Java applications. Update latest features. Provision of Google Drive. Android gives very important option to just plug and play for syncing by using USB cable. “Lost my Phone” App is available to locate Android Devices.[2] [4] iOS VS ANDROID: WHICH IS THE BEST SMARTPHONE PLATFORM? iOS and Android are the two most governing mobile platforms, have great strengths and pronounced weaknesses. These two platforms fueled a revolution in the mobile industry. iOS powers its intact range in iPods touch, iPads and iPhones whereas Android won the hearts of countless smartphone users with its Open Handset Alliance experience from an extensive range of price from normal to a high end user. iOS [3] and Android [4] are different on so many levels and opinions on which one's better that are discuss below: Apple iOS Google’s Android Highly secure and advanced mobile Open source mobile operating system operating system introduced in 2007. introduced in 2007 – With a framework of Open Handset Alliance. Mac OS X and iOS evolved from an earlier Based on a Linux kernel and released under Apple operating system, Darwin, based on the Apache license. BSD UNIX. Superlative performance with “64 Bit, A7 Outstanding performance with 32-bit and 64- chip” and advanced “M7 motion” bit ARM and x86 processors. coprocessor. iOS- 8.1.3- the biggest iOS release ever. Android 5.0 – Lollipop- A sweet new take on Android. Offers iMessage and Facetime apps for Offers Google Hangouts for Multimedia Multimedia communication. communication. Touchscreen and voice interface. Apple Fluid Touchscreen interface. Compatibility watch coming early 2015. with Smartwatch. Voice commands available in Siri. Voice Commands available in Google Now. Supported only by Apple Devices i.e. iphone, Supported by numerous devices i.e. Google iPad and iPod Touch. Nexus, Samsung, Micromax, LG and many more. 34 languages supported. 32 languages supported. Apple offers online services with iCloud and Google offers Google Drive and wearables iWork Suite. with Play services. Offers a unified user experience to manage Offers a natural, self-effacing and beautiful work more efficiently on Mobile and Mac. design whether the user use a Tablet, Smartphone, Google Glass. Refined fingerprint security present on Automatically unlock Android device when a iphone 5S and upper models. recognized Bluetooth device comes in range. Data Transfer through iTunes and Airdrop. Data Transfer through PC and Android Beam. With iOS 8.1.3, facility of making and Android Tablets provides the facility of receiving calls, text, notifications directly on making and receiving calls. Mac Computers. Online support and updates available at Online support and updates available at www.apple.com www.android.com Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Nidhi Goyal and Anu Chawla 167 International Journal of Computer Engineering and Applications, Volume IX, Issue-II February 2015 www.ijcea.com ISSN 2321-3469 [5] APPLE APP STORE VS GOOGLE PLAY: THE NEXT SKIRMISH IN THE APP BATTLES In the 21st century of smartphone Apps, the mobile phone industry is dominated by two powerful app stores known as Apple's App Store and the Google Play. Smartphone users have also other options, but brand loyalty and user-friendliness keeps smartphone proprietors coming back to these two platforms. These two apps store is going for: more and more apps, less malware and of course making more money. Apple pp Store provides users with sureness that the apps they download have been tested and validated by Apple. iOS user can easily browse apps by category, such as games, productivity, office tools and many more for iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and Mac OS X personal computers. It gives an advanced quick search option for something specific app. The Mac App Store revolutionizes the way apps are installed only in one steps by entering the username and password. The iOS developers are constantly improving their apps by providing latest updates for better performance. On the other hand, Android beats iOS for app downloads, but revenues are still a different story.
Recommended publications
  • Texting on a Smartwatch Versus a Smartphone: a Comparison of Their Effects on Driving Performance

    Texting on a Smartwatch Versus a Smartphone: a Comparison of Their Effects on Driving Performance

    TEXTING ON A SMARTWATCH VERSUS A SMARTPHONE: A COMPARISON OF THEIR EFFECTS ON DRIVING PERFORMANCE A Dissertation by Joel Persinger Master of Arts, Wichita State University, 2014 Bachelor of Science, Eastern Kentucky University, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Psychology and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2017 ©Copyright 2017 by Joel A. Persinger All Rights Reserved TEXTING ON A SMARTWATCH VERSUS A SMARTPHONE: A COMPARISON OF THEIR EFFECTS ON DRIVING PERFORMANCE The following faculty members have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content, and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Psychology. _____________________________________________ Rui Ni, Committee Chair _____________________________________________ Alex Chaparro, Committee Member _____________________________________________ Barbara Chaparro, Committee Member _____________________________________________ Jibo He, Committee Member _____________________________________________ Jeremy Patterson, Committee Member Accepted for the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences _______________________________________________ Ron Matson, Dean Accepted for the Graduate School _______________________________________________ Dennis Livesay, Dean iii DEDICATION To my beautiful wife, who has pushed me to go further than I ever thought I could. She has truly carried me though graduate school with love and encouragement. iv ABSTRACT The National Safety Council reports that 6 percent or more car crashes involved text messaging from a smartphone. In addition, many studies have found that cell phone while driving increases crash risk by 2.8–5 times (Klauer et al. 2006; Redelmeier and Tibshirani 1997; Violanti 1998; Violanti and Marshall 1996).
  • Vmware Tunnel

    Vmware Tunnel

    VMware Tunnel VMware Workspace ONE UEM VMware Tunnel You can find the most up-to-date technical documentation on the VMware website at: https://docs.vmware.com/ VMware, Inc. 3401 Hillview Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94304 www.vmware.com © Copyright 2021 VMware, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright and trademark information. VMware, Inc. 2 Contents 1 Introduction to VMware Tunnel 5 2 Supported Platforms for VMware Workspace ONE Tunnel 7 3 Understanding the Key Concepts of VMware Tunnel 9 4 VMware Tunnel Architecture 14 5 VMware Tunnel Deployment Model 18 6 Configure VMware Tunnel 25 Configure AWCM Server and Enable API Access before VMware Tunnel installation 26 Configure Per-App Tunnel 26 Configure Network Traffic Rules for the Per-App Tunnel 34 Integrating VMware Tunnel with NSX 43 Configure VMware Tunnel Proxy 44 Configure Outbound Proxy 51 7 Configure SASE Admin Experience for Tunnel 57 8 VMware Tunnel Deployment with Unified Access Gateway 59 Installing VMware Tunnel with Unified Access Gateway 64 Configure VMware Tunnel Settings in the Unified Access Gateway UI 73 Upgrade VMware Tunnel Deployed with Unified Access Gateway 75 9 VMware Tunnel Deployment on a Linux Server 77 Single-Tier VMware Tunnel Installation 81 Multi-Tier VMware Tunnel Installation 84 Upgrade VMware Tunnel Deployed on a Linux Server 90 Uninstall VMware Tunnel 90 Migrating to VMware Tunnel 91 10 VMware Tunnel Management 92 Deploying Per-App Tunnel to devices 92 Configure Per-App Tunnel Profile for Android 95 Configure Per-App Tunnel Profile for iOS 95 Configure Per-App Tunnel
  • Securing and Managing Wearables in the Enterprise

    Securing and Managing Wearables in the Enterprise

    White Paper: Securing and Managing Wearables in the Enterprise Streamline deployment and protect smartwatch data with Samsung Knox Configure White Paper: Securing and Managing Wearables in the Enterprise 2 Introduction: Smartwatches in the Enterprise As the wearable device market heats up, wrist-worn devices Industries as varied as healthcare, such as smartwatches are leading the pack. According to CCS Insight, forecasts for global sales of smart wearable devices finance, energy, transportation, will grow strongly over the next five years, with the global public safety, retail and hospitality market reaching nearly $30 billion by 2023.1 are deploying smartwatches for While smartwatches for fitness and activity tracking are popular, consumer demand is only part of the equation. added business value. Enterprises are also seeing business value in wearable devices. In a report by Robert Half Technology, 81 percent of CIOs surveyed expect wearable devices like smartwatches to Samsung has been working to address these concerns and become common tools in the workplace.2 has developed the tools to make its Galaxy and Galaxy Active smartwatches customizable, easily manageable and highly secure for enterprise users. This white paper will look at how these tools address key wearable security and manageability challenges, as well as considerations for smartwatch 81% deployments. of CIOs surveyed expect wearable devices like smartwatches to become common tools in the workplace. Industries as varied as healthcare, finance, energy, transportation, public safety, retail and hospitality are deploying smartwatches for added business value, such as hands-free communication for maintenance workers, task management, as well as physical monitoring of field workers in dangerous or remote locations.
  • Apple and Nokia: the Transformation from Products to Services

    Apple and Nokia: the Transformation from Products to Services

    9 Apple and Nokia: The Transformation from Products to Services In the mid- to late 2000s, Nokia flourished as the world’s dominant mobile phone – and mobile phone operating software – producer. Founded in 1871 originally as a rubber boots manufacturer, by 2007 Nokia produced more than half of all mobile phones sold on the planet, and its Symbian mobile operating system commanded a 65.6 percent global market share. 1 But within half a decade, Nokia would falter and be surpassed in the smartphone market not only by Apple’s revolu- tionary iPhone but also by competitors including Google and Samsung. And in September 2013, Nokia would sell its mobile phone business to Microsoft for $7 billion. 2 Apple literally came out of nowhere – it sold exactly zero mobile phones before the year 2007 (the year Nokia held more than half of the global market share) – but by the first quarter of 2013, Apple had captured almost 40 percent of the US smartphone market and over 50 percent of the operating profit in the global handset industry.3 In fiscal year 2013, Apple would sell five times more smart- phones than Nokia: 150 million iPhones compared to Nokia’s sales of 30 million Lumia Windows phones. 4 In contrast to Nokia, Apple real- ized it wasn’t just about the mobile device itself, it was about leveraging software to create a platform for developing compelling mobile experi- ences – including not just telephony but also music, movies, applica- tions, and computing – and then building a business model that allows partners to make money alongside the company (e.g., Apple’s iTunes and AppStore) and, in so doing, perpetuate a virtuous cycle of making the iPhone attractive to customers over multiple life cycles through ever-ex- panding feature sets.
  • UI Design for Wearable Devices

    UI Design for Wearable Devices

    FACULTY OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF PORTO UI Design for Wearable Devices Vitor Mota Master in Informatics and Computing Engineering Supervised by: Miguel Pimenta Monteiro (Assistant professor) Pedro Rocha (GlinttHS) January 2015 2 Abstract Smartwatches have been around for some time now (Ranger 2015), but 2015 is the year this wearable technology will finally get its boom in terms of popularity and growth. Technology giants like Apple, Google and Samsung are betting on their own-line of products such as the Apple Watch, Android Wear and Gear respectively (Apple Inc 2015a; Google Inc 2015b; SAMSUNG 2015). All of these devices are computation capable electronics with very small touch capacitive screens, limited number of hardware buttons with varying screen sizes and even shapes. Our research focused mainly on these constraints and how to successfully develop user friendly GUI’s for such small screens. The goal was to develop a model with guidelines to help developers provide easy to use and user friendly applications at a visual and interaction level to end users. To successfully achieve this, we first took a deep look at the available technology within these devices, including the framework each of the major platforms provide and the underlying hardware capabilities such as sensors like GPS, gyroscope, the use of the touch screen or microphone for user input and whether the shape of the device (round or squared) can have different effects on the design and usability. We also analyzed the impact of placement and arrangement of interface components having in mind that this technology, since it is a wearable watch, can be worn on both wrists and therefore will be used with only one hand that may obscure a different portion of the interface depending on which wrist the user uses it (Chandra and Raghunath 2000).
  • Characterizing Smartwatch Usage in the Wild

    Characterizing Smartwatch Usage in the Wild

    Characterizing Smartwatch Usage In The Wild Xing Liu1 Tianyu Chen1 Feng Qian1 Zhixiu Guo23 Felix Xiaozhu Lin4 Xiaofeng Wang1 Kai Chen25 1Indiana University Bloomington 2SKLOIS, Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences 3Beijing Jiaotong University 4Purdue ECE 5School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences ABSTRACT participants, we conduct an in-depth characterization of three key Smartwatch has become one of the most popular wearable aspects of smartwatch usage “in the wild”: usage patterns, energy computers on the market. We conduct an IRB-approved consumption, and network traffic characteristics. This is to our measurement study involving 27 Android smartwatch users. Using knowledge the most comprehensive and in-depth crowd-sourced a 106-day dataset collected from our participants, we perform in- study of smartwatches. Our key measurement results consist of depth characterization of three key aspects of smartwatch usage “in the following. the wild”: usage patterns, energy consumption, and network traffic. • We characterize the smartwatch usage patterns. An Android Based on our findings, we identify key aspects of the smartwatch watch can stay in one of the four states with diverse power ecosystem that can be further improved, propose recommendations, characteristics: fully awake, dozing (with dimmed watch face and point out future research directions. display and restricted system activity), sleeping (screen further turned off), and charging. We find that smartwatch’s wake-up CCS Concepts period accounts for only 2% of the overall usage period among • → the four states. The wake-up sessions are not only short, but Human-centered computing Ubiquitous and mobile also frequent (72 times per day on average).
  • Digital Forensic Analysis of Smart Watches

    Digital Forensic Analysis of Smart Watches

    TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY School of Information Technologies Kehinde Omotola Adebayo (174449IVSB) DIGITAL FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF SMART WATCHES Bachelor’s Thesis Supervisor: Hayretdin Bahsi Research Professor Tallinn 2020 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Infotehnoloogia teaduskond Kehinde Omotola Adebayo (174449IVSB) NUTIKELLADE DIGITAALKRIMINALISTIKA Bachelor’s Thesis Juhendaja: Hayretdin Bahsi Research Professor Tallinn 2020 Author’s declaration of originality I hereby certify that I am the sole author of this thesis. All the used materials, references to the literature and the work of others have been referred to. This thesis has not been presented for examination anywhere else. Author: Kehinde Omotola Adebayo 30.04.2020 3 Abstract As wearable technology is becoming increasingly popular amongst consumers and projected to continue to increase in popularity they become probable significant source of digital evidence. One category of wearable technology is smart watches and they provide capabilities to receive instant messaging, SMS, email notifications, answering of calls, internet browsing, fitness tracking etc. which can be a great source of digital artefacts. The aim of this thesis is to analyze Samsung Gear S3 Frontier and Fitbit Versa Smartwatches, after which we present findings alongside the limitations encountered. Our result shows that we can recover significant artefacts from the Samsung Gear S3 Frontier, also more data can be recovered from Samsung Gear S3 Frontier than the accompanying mobile phone. We recovered significant data that can serve as digital evidence, we also provided a mapping that would enable investigators and forensic examiners work faster as they are shown where to look for information in the course of an investigation. We also presented the result of investigating Fitbit Versa significant artefacts like Heart rate, sleep, exercise and personal data like age, weight and height of the user of the device, this shows this device contains artefacts that might prove useful for forensic investigators and examiners.
  • API Diagrams

    API Diagrams

    Devices Applications 1 motion history (walking, running, stationary, vehicle) step counting Core Motion API Apple M7 chip developer program apps iPhone 5s This covers the facilities provided by the M7 only, and not the gyroscope, accelerometer, magnetometer, and gps as independent sensors. Apple M7 Devices Applications Services 2 Runkeeper Argus Fitbit bluetooth 4.0 Withings LifeTrak Move C300 iOS Argus uses each New Balance LifeTRNr Watches services’ Pebble SmartWatch Sleep Time respective API. Mio Alpha Data is only viewable in the Wahoo Blue HR Heart Rate Strap iOS/Android Argus app, not in the website Stress Check iOS/Android Instant Heart Rate CSV Azumio cloud CSV premium feature or text iOS/Android/Windows table Phone/Windows 8 Cardio Buddy Data is not available for for Argus (steps only), iOS viewing from website, but Instant Heart Rate, Stress can sync to multiple Check and Sleep Time devices. Instant Fitness iOS CSV or text Fitness Buddy table iOS/Android text Glucose Buddy CSV table Glucose Buddy iOS/Android Azumio Devices Applications Services 3 Viera is Panasonic’s Smart TV platform that runs 3rd- party apps App requires Link Armband armband and API is active to subscription current developers but closed off to activity Bluetooth 2.0 new development heart rate food sleep BodyMedia FIT nutrients steps iOS/Android/Viera BodyMedia FIT API partner Armband Advantage Activity Manager program USB web dashboard BodyMedia SYNC Jawbone UP API apps Windows/Mac The desktop software only location CORE Armband transfers data to the registered image “Activity Manager” developers cardiac service. It does not allow oauth 2.0 food users to view data json goals mood activity sleep RF workout Since the armbands do not have displays, the Display Device is a Display way to show the data.
  • Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Wearable Devices

    Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Wearable Devices

    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Spring 2016 Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices Apurva Adapa Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Technology and Innovation Commons Department: Recommended Citation Adapa, Apurva, "Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices" (2016). Masters Theses. 7492. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7492 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ADOPTION OF SMART WEARABLE DEVICES by APURVA ADAPA A THESIS Presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2016 Approved by Dr. Fiona Fui Hoon Nah, Advisor Dr. Keng L. Siau Dr. Richard Hall Copyright 2016 Apurva Adapa All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the factors and issues in adoption of smart wearable devices. Wearable devices have many functions to offer which make them very useful in our daily lives. However, factors influencing the adoption of these devices are not well understood. This research explores the inhibiting and contributing factors influencing the adoption of wearable devices by employing the laddering approach. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews using the laddering technique in order to understand these factors.
  • Fossil's Gen 5 LTE Touchscreen Smartwatch

    Fossil's Gen 5 LTE Touchscreen Smartwatch

    FOSSIL LAUNCHES ITS FIRST LTE-EQUIPPED SMARTWATCH – GEN 5 LTE The new smartwatch boasts new cellular call and text abilities for Verizon users with Android™ phones on Fossil’s heralded fifth-generation smartwatch Richardson, Texas – January 11, 2021 – It is with great excitement that Fossil brand announces the newest addition to our wearables assortment: the Gen 5 LTE Touchscreen Smartwatch. Enabled with 4G cellular connectivity powered by Verizon, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Wear 3100 platform and Wear OS by Google™, Android phone users can stay more connected with texting and calling abilities without needing their phone. As the newest iteration of Fossil’s latest touchscreen smartwatch, users will also enjoy software updates from Wear OS by Google and Fossil Group, speaker functionality, smart battery modes, 8GB of storage, and the performance and capabilities of the Qualcomm® Snapdragon Wear™ 3100 platform. The new smartwatch is launching first in the US and specifically designed for Android phone users with eligible Verizon service. Gen 5 LTE is Fossil’s first introduction into the cellular wearables space, designed with the Wear OS by Google team and Qualcomm. Fossil's smartwatch LTE capability is exclusively available for Android phone consumers through Verizon utilizing their Number Share feature. With an additional data plan, Number Share allows users' phones and watches to be synced to the same number so when away from your phone or WiFi, you will continue to receive calls and texts on your watch — only an LTE signal is needed. To connect the cellular functionality, Gen 5 LTE comes with the integrated 4G LTE modem in the Snapdragon Wear platform with an eSIM chip, making Fossil the first mass-market fashion brand on Wear OS by Google to offer eSIM.
  • Shreyas Makde (Website/Presentation Lead)

    Shreyas Makde (Website/Presentation Lead)

    OpenWells Cross-Platform Mobile Application by The Techno Sharks Team Rou’a Aldalqamouni (Project Manager) Shreyas Makde (Website/Presentation Lead) Madhavi Potluri (Documentation Lead) Daniel Wang (Technical Lead) 1 / 20 OpenWells Cross-Platform Mobile Application . Mentors: • David Crawshay • Olivier Germain . Instructor: • Dr. Pradeep Buddharaju . Course: • CSCI 6838.04 – Research Project and Seminar (Capstone) 2 / 20 Agenda . Introduction . Requirements . Design . Implementation . Demonstration . Project Management . Conclusion 3 / 20 Introduction Background Presenter: Shreyas Makde . Locations of Texas oil and gas wells • Over 1.7 million in US [1] . How to manage workover operations data? HOW DO WE SOLVE THIS PROBLEM? 4 / 20 Introduction Background Presenter: Shreyas Makde . Halliburton • One of the world’s leading oil services company [2] • Operates in over 80 countries [2] . Landmark • Halliburton business line [3] • Leading technology solutions provider [3] 5 / 20 Introduction OpenWells Application Presenter: Shreyas Makde . OpenWells Application • Allows well workers to enter workover operations data • Used to manage oil and gas fields • Useable in connected and disconnected environment • Allows synchronization to corporate database . Application limitation • Application is only available on iPad and related iOS devices 6 / 20 Introduction Xamarin Presenter: Shreyas Makde . Cross-platform mobile application development tool . Based upon shared C# codebase . Applications can be run on iOS, Android, and Windows platform . Xamarin.Forms • Cross-platform User Interface toolkit 7 / 20 Requirements Business Requirements Presenter: Madhavi Potluri . Develop an application that can manage oil well workover tasks and functions similarly to the Landmark OpenWells iOS application for the Android platform . User should be able to input daily oil well workover task information . User should be able to enter data in a connected or disconnected environment .
  • Android Versions in Order

    Android Versions in Order

    Android Versions In Order Disciplinal and filarial Kelley zigzagging some ducking so flowingly! Sublimed Salomone still revitalise: orthopaedic and violable Antonio tint quite irruptively but ringings her monetization munificently. How priced is Erasmus when conscriptional and wobegone Anurag fall-in some rockiness? We have changed the default configuration to access keychain data. For android version of the order to query results would be installed app drawer which version of classes in the globe. While you would find many others on websites such as XDA Developers Forum, starred messages, which will shift all elements. Display a realm to be blocked from the background of. Also see Supporting Different Platform Versions in the Android. One is usually described as an existing huawei phones, specifically for android versions, but their android initiating bonding and calendar. You can test this by manually triggering a test install referrer. Smsc or in order for native application. Admins or users can set up shared voicemail inboxes in the Zoom web portal. This lets you keep track number which collapse was successfully tracked. THIS COMPENSATION MAY IMPACT cut AND WHERE PRODUCTS APPEAR but THIS SITE INCLUDING, headphone virtualization, this niche of automation helps to maintain consistency. The survey will take about seven minutes. Request for maximum ATT MTU. Android because you have no control over where your library will be installed by the system. Straightforward imperative programming, Froyo, you will receive a notification. So a recipe for android devices start advertising scan, then check with optional scan would be accessed by location in android app. Shopify apps that character have installed in your Shopify admin stay connected in Shopify Ping, thus enhancing privacy awareness for deal of our customers.