Biology of the Striped Cusk-Eel, Ophidion Marginatum, from North Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biology of the Striped Cusk-Eel, Ophidion Marginatum, from North Carolina BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 61(2): 327–342, 1997 BIOLOGY OF THE STRIPED CUSK-EEL, OPHIDION MARGINATUM, FROM NORTH CAROLINA Frank J. Schwartz ABSTRACT Nearly 2500 striped cusk-eels, Ophidion marginatum, were collected during a 6-yr intensive, 22-station trawl sampling of the Cape Fear River and nearby Sound and Atlan- tic Ocean areas in 1973-1978. Problems existed in confirming the specimens were O. marginatum rather than the similar appearing and ranging crested cusk-eel, O. welshi. The taxonomy remains unresolved but radiographs confirmed the North Carolina speci- mens were O. marginatum. Catch/effort and repetitive yearly sampling was compared by month, capture by size and station, morphometric relationships, age and growth, crest development, and food analyses. The study revealed O. marginatum was more active than previously believed, males and some females developed head crests, females were larger than males in size and many body-organ relationships, and females attain age 4 while males live for 3 yrs. O. marginatum feeds on a variety of foods, primarily crusta- ceans and fishes. Much remains to be learned of this elusive and systematically confus- ing species. Cohen and Nielsen (1978) reviewed the taxonomy of the Ophidiiform fishes, a group that includes the subfamily Ophidiinae (Pisces: Ophidiidae) which are mostly shelf- water inhabiting species (Gordon et al., 1984; Nelson, 1994). At least two similar and perhaps conspecific species pairs of cusk-eels, genus Ophidion, occur in the western Atlantic Ocean (Lea, 1980). One pair includes Ophidion (= Rissola) marginatum (DeKay, 1842) (striped cusk-eel) and O. welshi (Nichols and Breder, 1922) (crested cusk-eel). O. marginatum ranges from New York to northeastern Florida, O. welshi, from Georgia to northwestern Florida and the northern Gulf of Mexico (Fahay, 1992; Robins and Ray, 1986). Larvae and transformed specimens of O. welshi are now known from at least New Jersey southward (Fahay, pers. comm.). O. marginatum and O. welshi are similar in appearance, but their taxonomy is far from resolved. Both species possess horizontal stripes on the body and adult males are known to develop crests. Although Fahay (1992), Gordon et al. (1984), and Miller and Jorgensen (1973) presented meristic data that was intended to separate the two species, broad over- laps exist in meristic counts. Clearly the taxonomic relationships of the two species is not resolved. Little or no detailed information pertains to life history aspects of either species, other than size and sexual dimorphism (Robins, 1960) and nocturnal and burrowing behavior (Greenfield, 1968; Herrera et al., 1985; Hoese and Moore, 1977; Retzer 1991; Robins and Böhlke, 1959). Retzer (1991) examined life history aspects of 390 O. welshi from off Texas, and Courtenay (1971) and Rose (1981) noted crest development in O. marginatum from the western Atlantic. Capture of 2420 O. marginatum from 1973-1978 in the Cape Fear River North Caro- lina permitted studies of sizes, crest development by sex, morphometric and body organ relationships, length-weight relationships, catch effort, ages, and food habits. 327 328 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 61(2): 327–342, 1997 METHODS From 1973 to 1978, a 22-station survey was made of a 7854 ha area, that included the Cape Fear River and nearby areas, Masonboro Sound, the river from buoy 42 near Wilmington, North Caro- lina, southward for 17 km to and including the adjacent Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 1). Sampling was done with 7.6 and 12.2 m semi-balloon otter trawls and consisted of 3196 small (38.6%) and 5088 large otter trawl tows (61.4%). Sampling occurred during 0.25 h daylight tows. Time and direction of sampling usually was influenced by prevailing water currents, numerous hangs, and commercial ship traffic. Sampling occurred twice each January, weekly from February through May and Sep- tember through November, and half of December. June, July, and August of each year were sampled monthly. See Schwartz et al. (1982) for additional descriptions of each station’s substrates, physi- cal, and chemical features. Species determinations were made by examining and comparing radiographs produced by a Picker Hot-shot X-ray unit of O. marginatum from North Carolina and O. welshi (UF O37996) from the Gulf of Mexico: Fifty-eight percent of the specimens captured (1403) were measured and exam- ined in detail for sex, age and growth, body-organ and morphometric relationships, and food analy- ses, 210 (8.7%) were measured but not worked up or sexed, and no lengths were taken of 807 (33.3%) specimens (Table 1). Several lots of the 1973 specimens were deposited in the IMS-UNC fish collection at Morehead City, North Carolina. Largest catches occurred in 1974 (1088 speci- mens) and 1978 (589). All O. marginatum were immediately preserved in the field in 10% formalin. Laboratory analy- ses consisted of measuring head (HL), eye (E), standard (SL), and total (TL) lengths in millimeters (mm). Total body (BW), liver, and intestines were weighed to the nearest 0.01 g. Eye, heart, gonads, kidneys, and spleen weights were expressed in milligrams. Several body relationships were examined for each sex: SL/TL, HL/SL, E/SL, E/HL, SL/BW, TL/BW, and E/BW. Morphometric and body-organ weight relationships were determined by the formula log y = a + b log x. Ages were determined by noting evident annuli on each vertebra. Measurements from the focus to each annulus and the outer edge of each vertebra permitted back calculations of length at each age using the formula log y = a + b log x. Stomach and intestine food contents were examined in 549 males and 854 females. Each food eaten was determined as percent fullness, percent vol- ume, and percent frequency of number. Each food item was determined to the lowest possible taxon and an index of relative importance (IRI, Pinkas et al., 1971) was calculated where IRI = (%N + %V) . %F, N = numerical percentage, V = volumetric percentage, and F = frequency of occur- rence percentage, as a means of ranking the percent each food was found in either the stomach or intestine. Head crest formation was determined by external and internal visual examination of each speci- men, as external examinations alone were often misleading. Crests, depending on sex and time of year captured, were often not visible on males or females. Gonads were examined and verified the sex of each individual. OBSERVATIONS Combining ranges given by Fahay (1992), Gordon et al. (1984), and Miller and Jorgensen (1973), O. marginatum has 52-55 caudal vertebrae (vs. 50-52 in O. welshi), 138-162 dorsal rays (vs. 128-150) and 116-131 anal rays (vs. 105-122). North Carolina specimens possess 15 precaudal, 53-54 caudal vertebrae (total 68-69), 149-155 dorsal, and 118-124 anal rays indicating the study specimens were O. marginatum. CATCH/EFFORT. — Over 2 million fishes were collected during the 6-yr sampling period (Schwartz et al., 1982) of which 2420 were O. marginatum. Two hundred thirty-five of the 2420 O. marginatum were captured during the 6-yr sampling efforts in small trawls SCHWARTZ: BIOLOGY OF THE STRIPED CUSK-EEL 329 Figure 1. Location of river-channel and shoal otter trawl stations ( ■ ) sampled in the Cape Fear River and adjacent waters between 1973 and 1978. Buoys ( ● ), CS = CPL intake Canal Screen Station. 330 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 61(2): 327–342, 1997 fosrebmuN.1elbaT mutanigram.O ro,dexestontubderusaem,dexesdnaderusaem,thguac reviRraeFepaCehtni)htuosothtron(snoitats22taslwartegraldnallamsyb,nekathtgnelon .8791-3791saeratnecajdadna laohSdnalennahC raeY S3noitat 149715971697179718971l97Tota 433732E 1 4112 46172W C246BIN C4BIS3222331317 121274 31283 227 1421 233E 14252513 213 132533532001 29W3 383963187 C8S 985815641611 C1B2 3610 C2B1 158 C2M8111 179E1413111174 189 11081116247 18W9 12545263 12E8 8125121301 188 1071814856 198W 124117 O5C1,23644312723742 T0lato 281180820152569850242 Mderusae— 04001625057211131%4058.0 wdekroup Measured— 93923 7033012%7.8 notworkeduporsexed N7el.onshtg 111834388354478%033.3 Eot-troffws S3martllawl 304417459766674156319 L1egraartwl 51761919500151506884508 Cnahlenoitatssn=42,22,71,31,98 Shlaooitatssn=424,E2WC,BINC,B1,SI72,432,E3W1,91,E9W1,81,E8W Powre-tnalpClanaoitatssn=C,SCB,2CB,ICM 0=O,naecCS=ClanaSsneerc while 2185 were collected by large trawls. Largest, combined sampling efforts occurred in 1975-1977, with 1662, 1684, and 1681 tows made each year respectively (Table 1). SIZE/YEAR. —Overall, captured O. marginatum ranged from 41-245 mm TL (Table 2, Fig. 2). Mean sizes for the 1403 specimens measured and examined in detail (Table 2), regardless of sex, ranged 132.8 (in 1977) to 161.1 mm TL (1978). Smallest specimens were collected in 1976 and 1977 while the largest individuals occurred in 1974 (Table 2). SCHWARTZ: BIOLOGY OF THE STRIPED CUSK-EEL 331 Table 2. Numbers, sizes, and ranges of 1,403 O. marginatum captured in the Cape Fear River and adjacent areas 1974-1978; regardless of month and station of capture. YNXerae Rang 189749391548.89-24 14975 2341135.48-22 16976 601048.41-21 14977 281332.42-20 11978 711061.50-23 NUMBER/MONTH/YEAR. —Most specimens were captured between March-May or De- cember (1971 specimens) with lesser numbers during other months (Table 3). Mean sizes and ranges (Table 3) varied greatly between month and years captured. May 1975 (48 mm TL) and March 1977 (42 mm TL) produced the smallest specimens captured. Largest individuals were caught May 1974 and 1978 respectively (245 and 230 mm TL) (Table 3). CAPTURE/SIZE/STATION. —The Carolina Power and Light Company intake canal screens station with a newly dug muddy substrate (CS, Fig. 1, Table 3) produced 1161 specimens, 988 of which were captured in 1974. Eighty-three (92-220 mm TL) of the 988 were captured in February 1974, 163 (91-224) in March, 292 (103-210 mm TL) in April, 242 (115-212) in May, 45 (134-217) in June-July, two in October (97-157), and 171 (112-123) in December.
Recommended publications
  • A Concept for Assuring the Quality of Seafoods to Consumers
    MFR PAPER 1276 Table I.-The approximate shelf life of cod fillets (Ronalvalll et aI., 1973). Temperalure Approximate OF 0C shelf file (days) 32 0 14 A Concept for Assuring the Quality of 34 1.11 11 37 2.78 8 39 3.89 7 Seafoods to Consumers 41 5.00 6 44 6.67 5 49 9.44 4 56 13.30 3 L. J. RONSIVALLI, C. GORGA, J. D. KAYLOR, and J. H. CARVER at 31°_33°F (-0.56°-0.56°C) is about 2 weeks from the time they are har­ vested. (The shelf life of a product, in ABSTRACT - For more than a decade numerous surveys of the quality of this case, ends when it becomes unac­ seafoods at retail counters have resulted in consistent adverse reports, and it has ceptable as a food; that is, the total time been concluded that the unreliability of the quality of seafoods is the major reason it takes for the product to change from why their per capita consumption is so much lower than it is for beef, pork, or Grade A to Grade B to Grade C and then poultry. A concept for insuring the Grade A quality ofseafoods was developed and to the point just before it becomes unac­ tested in an attempt to demonstrate that the consumption offresh fish will increase ceptable.)' It has been established that when their quality and image are improved. This paper describes the concept, its the shelf life of fresh seafoods is af­ implementation under federal coordination, and its successful implementation by fected mainly by the temperature at industry which has grown from a pilot operation involving five retail stores and which they are held (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Fishery Trade
    August 1946 COMMERCIAL FISHERIES REVIEW 31 FOREIGN FISHERY TRADE Imports and Exports GROUNDFISH IMPORTS: From January 1 through J~e 29,1946, there were 24,676,000 pounds of fresh and frozen groundfish imported into the United States under the special tariff classification "Fish, fresh or frozen fillets, steaks, etc., of cod, haddock, hake, cusk, pollock, and rosefish." Approximately 19,615,000 pounds were received during the corresponding period in 1945, according to a report re­ ceived from the Bureau of Customs of the Treasury Department. The reduced tariff quota for the year is 20,380,724 pounds. June 2-29, Apr. 'LJ- June Jan. 1- Jan. 1- Commodity 1946 June 1.1946 19A5 June _29_ l~6 June J.o 1'3A5. Fish, fresh or frozen fillets, steaks, etc•• I of cod, haddock, hake, 4,330,976 3,983,146 3,176,093 24,675,749 19.615,133 cusk, pollock, and rosefish Canada COLD~STORAGE: Canadian freezings of fresh fishery products in May totaled 14,422,000 pounds. HeaViest freezings were of whole cod, cod fil~ets, and halibut, according to a preliminary report of the Department of Trade and Commerce of the DOminion Bureau of Statistics. Holdings totaled 22,309,000 pounds on June 1, compared with 15,537,000 pounds on May 1 and 17,489,000 pounds on June 1, 1945. Ecuador FISHING REGULATION: A report trom the American Embassy at ~uito, Ecuador, received by the State Department on July 1, 1946, states that the President of Ecuador, on December 27, 1945, signed Exeoutive Decree No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cusk Eels, Brotulas [=Cherublemma Trotter [E
    FAMILY Ophidiidae Rafinesque, 1810 - cusk eels SUBFAMILY Ophidiinae Rafinesque, 1810 - cusk eels [=Ofidini, Otophidioidei, Lepophidiinae, Genypterinae] Notes: Ofidini Rafinesque, 1810b:38 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Ophidion [as Ophidium; latinized to Ophididae by Bonaparte 1831:162, 184 [ref. 4978] (family); stem corrected to Ophidi- by Lowe 1843:92 [ref. 2832], confirmed by Günther 1862a:317, 370 [ref. 1969], by Gill 1872:3 [ref. 26254] and by Carus 1893:578 [ref. 17975]; considered valid with this authorship by Gill 1893b:136 [ref. 26255], by Goode & Bean 1896:345 [ref. 1848], by Nolf 1985:64 [ref. 32698], by Patterson 1993:636 [ref. 32940] and by Sheiko 2013:63 [ref. 32944] Article 11.7.2; family name sometimes seen as Ophidionidae] Otophidioidei Garman, 1899:390 [ref. 1540] (no family-group name) Lepophidiinae Robins, 1961:218 [ref. 3785] (subfamily) Lepophidium Genypterinae Lea, 1980 (subfamily) Genypterus [in unpublished dissertation: Systematics and zoogeography of cusk-eels of the family Ophidiidae, subfamily Ophidiinae, from the eastern Pacific Ocean, University of Miami, not available] GENUS Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 - cusk eels, brotulas [=Cherublemma Trotter [E. S.], 1926:119, Brotuloides Robins [C. R.], 1961:214] Notes: [ref. 4466]. Neut. Cherublemma lelepris Trotter, 1926. Type by monotypy. •Valid as Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 -- (Pequeño 1989:48 [ref. 14125], Robins in Nielsen et al. 1999:27, 28 [ref. 24448], Castellanos-Galindo et al. 2006:205 [ref. 28944]). Current status: Valid as Cherublemma Trotter, 1926. Ophidiidae: Ophidiinae. (Brotuloides) [ref. 3785]. Masc. Leptophidium emmelas Gilbert, 1890. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Synonym of Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 -- (Castro-Aguirre et al. 1993:80 [ref. 21807] based on placement of type species, Robins in Nielsen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3 FISH and CRUSTACEANS, MOLLUSCS and OTHER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES I 3-L Note
    )&f1y3X CHAPTER 3 FISH AND CRUSTACEANS, MOLLUSCS AND OTHER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES I 3-l Note 1. This chapter does not cover: (a) Marine mammals (heading 0106) or meat thereof (heading 0208 or 0210); (b) Fish (including livers and roes thereof) or crustaceans, molluscs or other aquatic invertebrates, dead and unfit or unsuitable for human consumption by reason of either their species or their condition (chapter 5); flours, meals or pellets of fish or of crustaceans, molluscs or other aquatic invertebrates, unfit for human consumption (heading 2301); or (c) Caviar or caviar substitutes prepared from fish eggs (heading 1604). 2. In this chapter the term "pellets" means products which have been agglomerated either directly by compression or by the addition of a small quantity of binder. Additional U.S. Note 1. Certain fish, crustaceans, molluscs and other aquatic invertebrates are provided for in chapter 98. )&f2y3X I 3-2 0301 Live fish: 0301.10.00 00 Ornamental fish............................... X....... Free Free Other live fish: 0301.91.00 00 Trout (Salmo trutta, Salmo gairdneri, Salmo clarki, Salmo aguabonita, Salmo gilae)................................... X....... Free Free 0301.92.00 00 Eels (Anguilla spp.)..................... kg...... Free Free 0301.93.00 00 Carp..................................... X....... Free Free 0301.99.00 00 Other.................................... X....... Free Free 0302 Fish, fresh or chilled, excluding fish fillets and other fish meat of heading 0304: Salmonidae, excluding livers and roes: 0302.11.00 Trout (Salmo trutta, Salmo gairdneri, Salmo clarki, Salmo aguabonita, Salmo gilae)................................... ........ Free 2.2¢/kg 10 Rainbow trout (Salmo gairnderi), farmed.............................. kg 90 Other............................... kg 0302.12.00 Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and Danube salmon (Hucho hucho).............
    [Show full text]
  • A Superfast Muscle in the Complex Sonic Apparatus of Ophidion Rochei
    © 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | The Journal of Experimental Biology (2014) 217, 3432-3440 doi:10.1242/jeb.105445 RESEARCH ARTICLE A superfast muscle in the complex sonic apparatus of Ophidion rochei (Ophidiiformes): histological and physiological approaches Loïc Kéver1,*, Kelly S. Boyle2, Branko Dragičević3, Jakov Dulčić3 and Eric Parmentier1 ABSTRACT characteristics in birds (Elemans et al., 2008), and sets the call rate In teleosts, superfast muscles are generally associated with the in echolocating bats (Elemans et al., 2011). Rome et al. (Rome et swimbladder wall, whose vibrations result in sound production. In al., 1996) also considered that rattlesnake tail shaker muscles are Ophidion rochei, three pairs of muscles were named ‘sonic’ because used ‘to produce sounds at the frequency at which the muscle their contractions affect swimbladder position: the dorsal sonic contracts’. Though these muscles are used to move the rattle, the last muscle (DSM), the intermediate sonic muscle (ISM), and the ventral statement is questionable notably because other authors showed that sonic muscle (VSM). These muscles were investigated thanks to the dimension of the proximal segment of the rattle determines electron microscopy and electromyography in order to determine their sound frequencies (Young and Brown, 1995). function in sound production. Fibers of the VSM and DSM were much All vertebrate skeletal (locomotor and sonic) muscles are thinner than the fibers of the ISM and epaxial musculature. However, ‘synchronous’: each twitch is preceded by an activation potential only VSM fibers had the typical ultrastructure of superfast muscles: (Josephson and Young, 1985; Josephson et al., 2000; Syme and low proportion of myofibrils, and high proportions of sarcoplasmic Josephson, 2002) and Ca2+ must be released and re-sequestered by the reticulum and mitochondria.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHES (C) Val Kells–November, 2019
    VAL KELLS Marine Science Illustration 4257 Ballards Mill Road - Free Union - VA - 22940 www.valkellsillustration.com [email protected] STOCK ILLUSTRATION LIST FRESHWATER and SALTWATER FISHES (c) Val Kells–November, 2019 Eastern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico: brackish and saltwater fishes Subject to change. New illustrations added weekly. Atlantic hagfish, Myxine glutinosa Sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus Deepwater chimaera, Hydrolagus affinis Atlantic spearnose chimaera, Rhinochimaera atlantica Nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum Whale shark, Rhincodon typus Sand tiger, Carcharias taurus Ragged-tooth shark, Odontaspis ferox Crocodile Shark, Pseudocarcharias kamoharai Thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus Bigeye thresher, Alopias superciliosus Basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus White shark, Carcharodon carcharias Shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Longfin mako, Isurus paucus Porbeagle, Lamna nasus Freckled Shark, Scyliorhinus haeckelii Marbled catshark, Galeus arae Chain dogfish, Scyliorhinus retifer Smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis Smalleye Smoothhound, Mustelus higmani Dwarf Smoothhound, Mustelus minicanis Florida smoothhound, Mustelus norrisi Gulf Smoothhound, Mustelus sinusmexicanus Blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus Bignose shark, Carcharhinus altimus Narrowtooth Shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus Spinner shark, Carcharhinus brevipinna Silky shark, Carcharhinus faiformis Finetooth shark, Carcharhinus isodon Galapagos Shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis Bull shark, Carcharinus leucus Blacktip shark, Carcharhinus limbatus Oceanic whitetip shark,
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Affinities of the Unfathomable Parabrotulidae
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 109 (2017) 337–342 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Short Communication Evolutionary affinities of the unfathomable Parabrotulidae: Molecular data indicate placement of Parabrotula within the family Bythitidae, Ophidiiformes ⇑ Matthew A. Campbell a,b, , Jørgen G. Nielsen c, Tetsuya Sado d, Chuya Shinzato e, Miyuki Kanda f, ⇑ Takashi P. Satoh g, Masaki Miya d, a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA b Fisheries Ecology Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA c Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark d Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba 260-8682, Japan e Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa 904-0485, Japan f DNA Sequencing Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa 904-0485, Japan g Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University, 459 Shirahama, Nishimuro, Wakayama 649-2211, Japan article info abstract Article history: Fishes are widely diverse in shape and body size and can quite rapidly undergo these changes. Received 3 November 2016 Consequently, some relationships are not clearly resolved with morphological analyses. In the case of Revised 30 January 2017 fishes of small body size, informative characteristics can be absent due to simplification of body struc- Accepted 2 February 2017 tures. The Parabrotulidae, a small family of diminutive body size consisting of two genera and three spe- Available online 6 February 2017 cies has most recently been classified as either a perciform within the suborder Zoarcoidei or an ophidiiform.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Marine Fishes from Metropolitan France
    Checklist of the marine fishes from metropolitan France by Philippe BÉAREZ* (1, 8), Patrice PRUVOST (2), Éric FEUNTEUN (2, 3, 8), Samuel IGLÉSIAS (2, 4, 8), Patrice FRANCOUR (5), Romain CAUSSE (2, 8), Jeanne DE MAZIERES (6), Sandrine TERCERIE (6) & Nicolas BAILLY (7, 8) Abstract. – A list of the marine fish species occurring in the French EEZ was assembled from more than 200 references. No updated list has been published since the 19th century, although incomplete versions were avail- able in several biodiversity information systems. The list contains 729 species distributed in 185 families. It is a preliminary step for the Atlas of Marine Fishes of France that will be further elaborated within the INPN (the National Inventory of the Natural Heritage: https://inpn.mnhn.fr). Résumé. – Liste des poissons marins de France métropolitaine. Une liste des poissons marins se trouvant dans la Zone Économique Exclusive de France a été constituée à partir de plus de 200 références. Cette liste n’avait pas été mise à jour formellement depuis la fin du 19e siècle, © SFI bien que des versions incomplètes existent dans plusieurs systèmes d’information sur la biodiversité. La liste Received: 4 Jul. 2017 Accepted: 21 Nov. 2017 contient 729 espèces réparties dans 185 familles. C’est une étape préliminaire pour l’Atlas des Poissons marins Editor: G. Duhamel de France qui sera élaboré dans le cadre de l’INPN (Inventaire National du Patrimoine Naturel : https://inpn. mnhn.fr). Key words Marine fishes No recent faunistic work cov- (e.g. Quéro et al., 2003; Louisy, 2015), in which the entire Northeast Atlantic ers the fish species present only in Europe is considered (Atlantic only for the former).
    [Show full text]
  • Brosme Brosme
    Cusk − Brosme brosme Overall Vulnerability Rank = High Biological Sensitivity = High Climate Exposure = High Data Quality = 67% of scores ≥ 2 Expert Data Expert Scores Plots Scores Quality (Portion by Category) Brosme brosme Low Moderate Stock Status 3.0 0.4 High Other Stressors 1.5 0.8 Very High Population Growth Rate 3.1 1.6 Spawning Cycle 3.0 2.4 Complexity in Reproduction 1.3 1.5 Early Life History Requirements 2.6 0.2 Sensitivity to Ocean Acidification 1.2 1.6 Prey Specialization 1.1 2.4 Habitat Specialization 2.7 2.4 Sensitivity attributes Sensitivity to Temperature 2.0 2.4 Adult Mobility 2.7 2.4 Dispersal & Early Life History 1.8 2.2 Sensitivity Score High Sea Surface Temperature 3.9 3.0 Variability in Sea Surface Temperature 1.0 3.0 Salinity 1.1 3.0 Variability Salinity 1.2 3.0 Air Temperature 1.0 3.0 Variability Air Temperature 1.0 3.0 Precipitation 1.0 3.0 Variability in Precipitation 1.0 3.0 Ocean Acidification 4.0 2.0 Exposure variables Variability in Ocean Acidification 1.0 2.2 Currents 2.1 1.0 Sea Level Rise 1.1 1.5 Exposure Score High Overall Vulnerability Rank High Cusk (Brosme brosme) Overall Climate Vulnerability Rank: High (69% certainty from bootstrap analysis). Climate Exposure: High. Two exposure factors contributed to this score: Ocean Surface Temperature (3.9) and Ocean Acidification (4.0). All life stages of Cusk use marine habitats. Biological Sensitivity: High. Three sensitivity attributes scored above 3.0: Stock Status (3.0), Population Growth Rate (3.1), and Spawning Cycle (3.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Cusk (Brosme Brosme)
    Cusk (Brosme brosme) Family Gadidae, Cods Common name: cusk Description: Cusk are dark slate to red brown above with yellowish sides and a dirty white underbody. They have an elongated, taper shaped body with a blunt snout and a single barbel on their chin. Their dorsal and anal fins are exceptionally long and they have a rounded tail fin, all of which are bordered with a black stripe that is edged in white. Cusk can grow to a size of about 3 1/2 feet in length and to 30 pounds in weight. Their average size in the waters of the Gulf of Maine, however, is closer to 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 feet in length and 5 to 10 pounds in weight. Where found: offshore Similar Gulf of Maine species: wolffish, eel pout Remarks: Cusk are exclusively bottom dwellers that inhabit moderately deep waters of 60 to 90 feet. They prefer a hard rough substrate made up of rocks or boulders. These fish are solitary in nature and are not particularly abundant. Cusk are excellent table fare, particularly in chowders and stews. Occasionally, anglers will hook onto a cusk while fishing for cod or haddock. Although these fish are considered to be weak and sluggish swimmers, they have a powerful body. Both clams and herring work well as bait when fishing for cusk. Records: MSSAR IGFA All­Tackle World Record Fish Illustrations by: Roz Davis Designs, Damariscotta, ME (207) 563­2286 With permission, the use of these pictures must state the following: Drawings provided courtesy of the Maine Department of Marine Resources Recreational Fisheries program and the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund..
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Trends in Cusk Eel Sound Production at a Proposed US Wind Farm Site
    Vol. 24: 201–210, 2016 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online February 22 doi: 10.3354/ab00650 Aquat Biol OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Temporal trends in cusk eel sound production at a proposed US wind farm site T. Aran Mooney1,*, Maxwell B. Kaplan1, Annamaria Izzi1,2, Luca Lamoni1,3, Laela Sayigh1 1Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 2Northeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 3School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TH, UK ABSTRACT: Many marine organisms produce sound during key life history events. Identifying and tracking these sounds can reveal spatial and temporal patterns of species occurrence and behaviors. We describe the temporal patterns of striped cusk eel Ophidion marginatum calls across approximately 1 yr in Nantucket Sound, MA, USA, the location of a proposed offshore wind energy installation. Stereotyped calls typical of courtship and spawning were detected from April to October with clear diel, monthly, and seasonal patterns. Acoustic energy increased in the evenings and peaked during crepuscular periods, with the dusk call levels typically higher in energy and more rapid in onset than those from near-dawn periods. Increased call energy and substantial overlap of calls during certain periods suggest that many cusk eels were often calling simultaneously. Call energy (measured in energy flux density) peaked in July and patterns fol- lowed seasonal changes in sunrise and sunset. Sound levels were high (over 150 dB re 1 µPa2 s) during the summer, indicating that this cusk eel population is a substantial contributor to the local soundscape.
    [Show full text]