DOCSLIB.ORG

Economists' Views About Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics Author(S): Victor R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economists' Views About Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics Author(S): Victor R American Economic Association Economists' Views about Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics Author(s): Victor R. Fuchs, Alan B. Krueger and James M. Poterba Source: Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Sep., 1998), pp. 1387-1425 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564804 Accessed: 12-06-2020 14:53 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Economic Literature This content downloaded from 18.28.8.168 on Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:53:25 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXXVI (September 1998), pp. 1387-1425 Economists' Views about Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics VICTOR R. FUCHS ALAN B. KRUEGER and JAMES M. POTERBA' 1. Introduction sues. But is the popular image justified? Richard Alston, James Kearl, and Mi- W 5 7INSTON CHURCHILL is supposed chael Vaughan (1992), who conducted a to have complained that whenever large-scale (464 respondents) survey of he asked Britain's three leading econo- economists in all fields, concluded that mists for advice about economic policy, there is considerable consensus among he received four different opinions-two economists, but the questions in their from John Maynard Keynes. The image survey dealt primarily with positive eco- of economists in disarray about economic nomics, not economic policy. The seven policy is firmly embedded in the popular questions that were clearly about pol- mind, enhanced, no doubt, by the ten- icy-unconditional "should" questions- dency of many journalists to seek out ex- had a mean entropy score of 0.83, which treme opposing views on controversial is- indicates a very high level of disagree- ment.2 1 Fuchs: Stanford University and NBER. In a survey of 50 leading health Krueger: Princeton University and NBER. Po- economists, Victor Fuchs (1996) found terba: Massachusetts Institute of Technology and NBER. Fuchs acknowledges financial support considerable disagreement (mean en- from The Robert Wood Johnson and Andrew W. tropy 0.77) regarding major issues of Mellon Foundations through the NBER; Krueger health policy. The extent of disagree- from the Princeton Industrial Relations Section; and Poterba from the National Science Founda- ment was particularly striking when tion through the NBER. We are grateful to the compared with the high level of agree- survey respondents; to Claire Gilchrist who ad- ment (mean entropy 0.52) among the ministered the survey and served as secretary for the project; and to Deborah Kerwin-Peck who same economists about the determi- processed the data, prepared the tables, and made nants of health and the determinants of many editorial improvements. We thank the par- ticipants at workshops at Harvard-MIT, Princeton, and Stanford; and Kenneth Arrow, David Cutler, 2 Each question allowed three possible answers: Peter Diamond, Eric Engen, Martin Feldstein, disagree, agree, or agree with proviso. The highest William Gale, Daniel Kahnemann, Daniel Kam- possible entropy score is 1.0, indicating that re- men, Hirschel Kasper, Mark McClellan, Lincoln spondents were evenly split among the three an- Moses, John Pencavel, A. Mitchell Polinsky, Karl swers. A score of zero indicates at all respon- Scholz, and three anonymous referees. dents chose the same answer. 1387 This content downloaded from 18.28.8.168 on Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:53:25 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1388 Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI (September 1998) health expenditures. Furthermore, the estimates and 95-percent confidence small disagreement that did exist re- intervals for economic parameters; c) garding the positive questions seemed values questions (answered on a con- to play no role in explaining policy dif- tinuous scale) regarding income redis- ferences. This result is at variance with tribution, efficiency versus equity, and Milton Friedman's view (1953) that pol- individual versus social responsibility; icy differences can usually be explained and d) political party identification. The by differences in judgments about posi- two surveys, which are reproduced in tive economics. the Appendix, are very similar in form, This paper reports the results of sur- but nearly all of the policy and eco- veys of specialists in labor economics nomic parameter questions are specialty and public economics at 40 leading re- specific. Two policy questions, one search universities in the United States. about increasing AFDC payments and We ascertained their opinions of eco- one about eliminating the cap on OASI nomic policies in their areas of special- payroll taxes, and two economic pa- ization and measured the extent of rameter questions about the Marshal- agreement or disagreement. We also at- lian and Hicksian labor supply elastici- tempted to determine the extent to ties for men aged 25-54, were included which policy disagreement is related to in both surveys. differences in estimates of relevant eco- The surveys were distributed in the nomic parameters, and differences in summer of 1996 to economists special- values. We used the respondents' opin- izing in labor economics and public eco- ions regarding their 95-percent confi- nomics on the faculties of the universi- dence intervals3 for the economic pa- ties with the 40 leading economics rameters to determine how often the departments in the United States. The average best estimate, or most com- 40 leading economics departments were monly occurring estimate, falls within identified from Loren Scott and Peter these intervals. We also compared their Mitias's (1996) ranking of departments, individual uncertainties with the collec- which is based on publication records of tive uncertainties as reflected in vari- the faculty. Specialists at these universi- ation across respondents in the best es- ties were identified from listings in the timates of the economic parameters. American Economic Association direc- tory, college catalogs, the 1996 Pren- 2. Description of Surveys tice-Hall Guide to Economics Faculty, and by personal knowledge. All labor Four main types of questions were economists and public finance econo- used in both the labor economics and mists in the economics departments at public economics surveys: a) policy universities with a top-40 economics de- opinions to be answered on a continu- partment were sent a questionnaire. In ous scale from "strongly oppose" to addition, questionnaires were sent to "strongly favor"; b) quantitative best many labor and public finance econo- mists at the business schools and public 3 Respondents were asked to specify lower and policy schools at these universities.4 A upper limits of a 95-percent confidence interval and were told that these limits need not be sym- metrical around the best estimate. The term "sub- 4The labor economics survey was sent to all jective probability interval" might be more appro- self-identified labor economists in a number of priate than "confidence interval," but we use the different departments at these universities; the Tatter term in the paper because that was the one public economics survey, however, was mailed to used in the survey. all public economists in economics departments This content downloaded from 18.28.8.168 on Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:53:25 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Fuchs, Krueger, Poterba: Economists' Views-Parameters, Values, Policies 1389 separate covering letter for each survey ates such as views concerning redistri- explained the general purpose of the bution. The response rate was lower, survey and promised anonymity to the however, if the economic parameters respondents. Fuchs' secretary at the preceded the policy questions. We in- National Bureau of Economic Research terpret the results of the split-ballot ex- kept track of the responses in order to periment as providing mild support that facilitate the sending of a follow-up re- the questions elicited views that were quest after two months. A total of 65 not easily manipulated, although the re- replies (response rate 39 percent) was sponse rate is higher if less technical received for labor economics, and 69 re- questions are asked first. plies (response rate 66 percent) for public economics. There was no signifi- 3. Major Conclusions cant difference between the responders and nonresponders with respect to uni- Before discussing the survey results versity rank in either survey.5 Every in detail, we summarize our major con- question provided a "no opinion" op- clusions. First, both surveys reveal a tion; the percent responding "no opin- great deal of disagreement among ion" or not providing an answer to each economists about policy proposals in question is reported in the survey re- their areas of specialization. Only one sults. of the 13 proposals (a 25-cent per gal- In the labor economics questionnaire, lon increase in the gasoline tax) elicited we implemented a "split-ballot" experi- a strong consensus either in favor or in ment in which the order of the policy opposition. Second, policy positions are and economic parameter questions was usually more closely related to differ- randomly reversed in half the question- ences in values than to differences in naires. Except for one question-the estimates of what we judge to be rele- desirability of increasing AFDC bene- vant economic parameters. This is fits-the order of the questions had a clearly evident for both surveys in sim- statistically insignificant effect on the ple correlations among the different mean responses to the policy and pa- types of variables and in multiple re- rameters questions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How the Human Capital Model Explains Why the Gender Wage Gap Narrowed
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Polachek, Solomon W. Working Paper How the Human Capital Model Explains Why the Gender Wage Gap Narrowed IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1102 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Polachek, Solomon W. (2004) : How the Human Capital Model Explains Why the Gender Wage Gap Narrowed, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1102, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20337 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu IZA DP No. 1102 How the Human Capital Model Explains Why the Gender Wage Gap Narrowed Solomon W. Polachek DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DISCUSSION PAPER April 2004 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor How the Human Capital Model Explains Why the Gender Wage Gap Narrowed Solomon W.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNOLOGY and GROWTH: an OVERVIEW Jeffrey C
    Y Proceedings GY Conference Series No. 40 Jeffrey C. Fuhrer Jane Sneddon Little Editors CONTENTS TECHNOLOGY AND GROWTH: AN OVERVIEW Jeffrey C. Fuhrer and Jane Sneddon Little KEYNOTE ADDRESS: THE NETWORKED BANK 33 Robert M. Howe TECHNOLOGY IN GROWTH THEORY Dale W. Jorgenson Discussion 78 Susanto Basu Gene M. Grossman UNCERTAINTY AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 91 Nathan Rosenberg Discussion 111 Joel Mokyr Luc L.G. Soete CROSS-COUNTRY VARIATIONS IN NATIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH RATES," THE ROLE OF aTECHNOLOGYtr 127 J. Bradford De Long~ Discussion 151 Jeffrey A. Frankel Adam B. Jaffe ADDRESS: JOB ~NSECURITY AND TECHNOLOGY173 Alan Greenspan MICROECONOMIC POLICY AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 183 Edwin Mansfield Discnssion 201 Samuel S. Kortum Joshua Lerner TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION IN U.S. MANUFACTURING: THE GEOGRAPHIC DIMENSION 215 Jane Sneddon Little and Robert K. Triest Discussion 260 John C. Haltiwanger George N. Hatsopoulos PANEL DISCUSSION 269 Trends in Productivity Growth 269 Martin Neil Baily Inherent Conflict in International Trade 279 Ralph E. Gomory Implications of Growth Theory for Macro-Policy: What Have We Learned? 286 Abel M. Mateus The Role of Macroeconomic Policy 298 Robert M. Solow About the Authors Conference Participants 309 TECHNOLOGY AND GROWTH: AN OVERVIEW Jeffrey C. Fuhrer and Jane Sneddon Little* During the 1990s, the Federal Reserve has pursued its twin goals of price stability and steady employment growth with considerable success. But despite--or perhaps because of--this success, concerns about the pace of economic and productivity growth have attracted renewed attention. Many observers ruefully note that the average pace of GDP growth has remained below rates achieved in the 1960s and that a period of rapid investment in computers and other capital equipment has had disappointingly little impact on the productivity numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Economics and Health Economics Research
    Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society, Vol. 57, No. 3,1979 Health Economics and Health Economics Research H erbert E. K larm an Graduate School o f Public Administration, New York University his presentation is d r a w n from my own experience and best recollection of readings and conversations. I have not done any new research. The presentation is divided into T four parts, as follows: 1. Pre-1960. 2. Post-1960. 3. A reformulation by subject area. 4. A view from Washington, 1976-1977. Pre-1960 Economists were working on health care long before there was a subdiscipline called health economics. In the 1930s the American Medical Association (AMA) main­ tained a permanent Bureau of Medical Economics or Medical Economics Research. The Committee on the Costs of Medical Care (CCMC) conducted numerous surveys, studies, and analyses, off which the research community lived for a long time. Milton Fried­ man and Simon Kuznets at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) were studying professional incomes—with much emphasis on comparisons between physicians and dentists. This proved to be highly influential in thinking by economists about med­ icine, and was reenforced by Friedman’s own later writings and by Reuben Kessel’s 1958 article on medical price discrimination as evidence of monopolistic behavior. 0160-1997-79-5703-0371-09 $01.00/0 ©1979 Milbank Memorial Fund 371 372 Herbert E. Klarman In the 1940s, after World War II, Seymour Harris at Harvard was studying public expenditures for health care. He saw the impor­ tance of direct payments to providers at a time when cash benefits to recipients of public assistance were still dominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Autistic Economics Review Issue No
    sanity, humanity and science post-autistic economics review Issue no. 41, 5 March 2007 back issues at www.paecon.net Subscribers: 9,461 from over 150 countries Subscriptions are free. To subscribe, email "subscribe". To unsubscribe, email "unsubscribe". Send to : [email protected] In this issue: - What would post-autistic trade policy be? Alan Goodacre (University of Stirling, UK) ........................................................................................ 2 - On the need for a heterodox health economics Robert McMaster (University of Aberdeen, UK) ........................................................................... 9 - True cost environmental accounting for a post-autistic economy David A. Bainbridge (Alliant International University, USA) ..................................................... 23 - Does John Kenneth Galbraith have a legacy? Richard Parker (Harvard University, USA) .................................................................................. 29 - Labour rights in China Tim Costello, Brendan Smith and Jeremy Brecher (USA) ............................... 34 - Endogenous growth theory: the most recent “revolution” in economics Peter T. Manicas (University of Hawaii, USA) ............................................................................ 39 - Submissions, etc. ............................................................................................................................... 54 1 post-autistic economics review, issue no. 41 What would post-autistic trade policy be? Alan Goodacre
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2016-2017 Our Mission
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016-2017 Our Mission We support research that informs economic policymaking while engaging future leaders and scholars. We share knowledge and build relationships among academics, government officials, the business community and the public. Table of Contents Director’s Letter .......................................... 2 Donors ........................................................ 27 Policy Impact .............................................. 4 Senior Fellows ............................................. 32 Student Support .......................................... 8 Faculty Fellows ........................................... 36 Events and Conferences ............................... 12 Researchers ................................................ 36 Policy Briefs ................................................ 20 Visitors and Young Scholars ......................... 37 Income and Expenditures ............................ 21 Steering Committee ..................................... 39 Philanthropy ............................................... 22 Advisory Board ........................................... 41 John Gunn Janet Yellen speaks at SIEPR 2016–2017 ANNUAL REPORT | TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Director’s Letter Dear Friends, Thinking of the past year reminds us of because the future of economic what’s at stake when it comes to economic policymaking can only be as good as those policymaking. Many of the biggest national trained to analyze, craft and implement debates — whether about tax reform, health the policies that will
    [Show full text]
  • This PDF Is a Selection from a Published Volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Supplement to NBER Report Six Volume Author/Editor: NBER Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/unkn70-2 Conference Date: Publication Date: June 1970 Chapter Title: National Bureau of Economic Research Fiftieth Anniversary Dinner: Transcript of Proceedings Chapter Author(s): NBER Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c4232 Chapter pages in book: (p. 1 - 30) NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY DINNER Transcript of Proceedings A Supplement to National Bureau Report 6 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, INC. 261 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10016 JUNE 1970 National Bureau Report and supplements thereto have been exetn pied from the rules governing submission of manuscripts to, and critical review by, the Board of Directors of the National Bureau. Each issue, however, is reviewed and accepted for publication by the Research Committee of the Bureau and a standing committee of the Board. Copyright ©1970by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY DINNER Starlight Roof —Waldorf-AstoriaHotel New York, New York February 27, 1970 PRESIDING: MR. THEODORE 0. YNTEMA: Honored guests, ladies and gentlemen: We are here to celebrate the Fiftieth Anniversary of the National Bureau of Eco- nomic Research and to honor Arthur Burns for his distinguished leadership of the Bureau for so many years. This is also an occasion on which we are happy to greet new friends and to recognize and thank all of you, literally hundreds of you here, who have supported the Bureau and participated in its work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Reforming the US Health Care System
    Wanting It All: The Challenge of Reforming the U.S. Health Care System Wanting It All: The Challenge of Reforming the U.S. Health Care System ©2007 Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. All rights reserved. edited by No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. Jane Sneddon Little This edited volume is based on a conference held in June 2005 by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Conference Series No. 50 Cover illustrations by Art Glazer. This book was set in Sabon by Sztrecska Publishing and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Boston, Massachusetts vi Contents Comments on Enthoven’s “The U.S. Experience 119 Contents with Managed Care and Managed Competition” Michael E. Chernew Comments on Enthoven’s “The U.S. Experience 127 with Managed Care and Managed Competition” Sherry A. M. Glied 5 How the U.S. Health Care System Affects U.S. Labor 135 Markets The U.S. Health Care System and Labor Markets 137 Brigitte C. Madrian Acknowledgments ix Comments on Madrian’s “The U.S. Health Care System 165 1 Introduction 1 and Labor Markets” Reforming the U.S. Health Care System: Where There’s 3 Henry S. Farber a Will, There Could be a Way Employer-Funded Health Care and Labor Markets: 173 Jane Sneddon Little and Teresa Foy Romano An Insider’s View 2 Understanding the Political Challenge 27 Robert S.
    [Show full text]
  • New & Classic Titles by Prof Victor Fuchs
    New & Classic Titles by Prof Victor Fuchs & Important Titles on Health Economics Victor R Fuchs is the Henry J Kaiser Professor Emeritus at Stanford University where he applies economic analyses to social problems of national concern, with special emphasis on health and medical care. He is the author of nine books and editor of six others, including the classic Who Shall Live? Health, Economics, and Social Choice, second expanded edition published by World Scientific Publishing Co. Professor Fuchs’ contributions have been recognized by his election as president of the American Economic Association, election to the American Philosophical Society, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the National Academy of Medicine. The award of the American Society of Health Economist for Lifetime Contributions to Health Economics is named in honor of Professor Fuchs. NEW Book by Prof Victor R Fuchs Health Economics and Policy Selected Writings by Victor Fuchs by Victor R Fuchs (Stanford) “The collection represents an extraordinary intellectual achievement and ... a handbook for anyone thinking about health and health policy.” Foreword by Sir Angus Deaton winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics “Victor Fuchs ... is one of the world’s most influential figures in health, medicine, and policy ... His writings could be considered the single most authoritative guidebook on health economics.” Foreword by Victor J Dzau MD, President of the National Academy of Medicine “You have to be as old as I am to know how long Victor Fuchs has been the dean of health economics. No one knows more, or has thought as carefully about all matters relating to health care than Victor.
    [Show full text]
  • This PDF Is a Selection from an Out-Of-Print Volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The New Realities of the Business Cyde Volume Author/Editor: NBER Volume Publisher: NBER Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/unkn73-3 Publication Date: 1973 Chapter Title: Organization and Finances Chapter Author: Various Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c4183 Chapter pages in book: (p. 136 - 158) V Organization and Finances DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS The Board of Directors held their annual meet- additional contributions. ing on September 13, 1972, and a special meet- Chairman Heller appointed a Special Advi- ing on April 13, 1973, to review and act on sory Committee of Directors to work with the Bureau affairs, including proposals for research, President on proposals to restructure the Na- staff appointments, publications, finances, and tionalBureau's membership and Boardof some decentralization of activities to branch of- Directors and toprovideforadministrative fices. In addition, the Board's Executive Com- changes. mittee met three times during the year to con- In February 1973, Geoffrey H. Moore returned sider current issues and take actions within the to the National Bureau to re-assume his posi- general policies established by the Board. tion as Vice President—Research, after being on At the annual meeting Robert M. Will of the leave while serving as U.S. Commissioner of University of British Columbia became a Direc- Labor Statistics. tor of the National Bureau by appointment of Joan R. Tron, Director of Publications, re- the Canadian Economics Association, succeed- signed in March 1973 to become Senior Editor ing Douglas G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Integration of Economic History Into Economics
    Cliometrica https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-018-0170-8 ORIGINAL PAPER The integration of economic history into economics Robert A. Margo1 Received: 28 June 2017 / Accepted: 16 January 2018 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract In the USA today the academic field of economic history is much closer to economics than it is to history in terms of professional behavior, a stylized fact that I call the ‘‘integration of economic history into economics.’’ I document this using two types of evidence—use of econometric language in articles appearing in academic journals of economic history and economics; and publication histories of successive cohorts of Ph.D.s in the first decade since receiving the doctorate. Over time, economic history became more like economics in its use of econometrics and in the likelihood of scholars publishing in economics, as opposed to, say, economic history journals. But the pace of change was slower in economic history than in labor economics, another subfield of economics that underwent profound intellec- tual change in the 1950s and 1960s, and there was also a structural break evident for post-2000 Ph.D. cohorts. To account for these features of the data, I sketch a simple, overlapping generations model of the academic labor market in which junior scholars have to convince senior scholars of the merits of their work in order to gain tenure. I argue that the early cliometricians—most notably, Robert Fogel and Douglass North—conceived of a scholarly identity for economic history that kept the field distinct from economics proper in various ways, until after 2000 when their influence had waned.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN THE MARKETS FOR EDUCATION AND HEALTH CARE: HOW AND WHY? James M. Poterba Working Paper No. 4916 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,MA 02138 November1994 Thispaper was prepared for the NBER Conference on "Individual and Social Responsibility." I am grateful to David Cutler, Martin Feldstein, Claudia Goldin, Jonathan Gruber, Roger Noll. Julio Rotemberg, Richanl Zeckhauser, and .especially Victor Fuchs for helpful discussions on these issues.This research wassupportedby the NSF and the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation. This paper is part of NBER's research programs in Health Care, Labor Studies and Public Economics. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 1994 by James M. Poterba. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. NBER Working Paper #4916 November 1994 GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN THE MARKETS FOR EDUCATION AND HEALTH CARE: HOW AND WHY? ABSTRACT Education and health care are the two largest government expenditure items in the United States. The public sector directly provides the majority of educational services, through the publicschool bureaucracy, while most public support for health care is channelled through a system of tax-supported government payments for services provided by private providers. The contrast between public policies in these markets raises a host of questions about the scope of government in a mixed economy, and the structure of policies for market intervention. This paper examines how two st4ndard arguments for government intervention in private markets, market failure and redistribution, apply to the markets for education and medical care.
    [Show full text]