DOCSLIB.ORG

The Future Landscapes of Bioeconomy – Hungary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Future Landscapes of Bioeconomy – Hungary The future landscapes of bioeconomy: Hungary A Climate-KIC Bioeconomy platform study Final draft, February 2014 1 This study was accomplished within the frame of the Climate-KIC Bioeconomy Platform and carried out by the following Hungarian experts: Zsolt Barta, PhD graduated from Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) in 2007 receiving a master degree in bioengineering. Between 2007 and 2010 he took part in the doctoral school program at BME in the field of second generation bioethanol production. During his PhD studies he spent several months at Lund University in Sweden and at CIEMAT Research Centre in Spain, where he performed research on biomass conversion into ethanol and biogas. In 2011 he successfully defended his PhD dissertation, and he received his PhD. Since 2011 he has been employed as assistant lecturer at the Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, BME. Currently he carries out research on biorefining of corn fibre into value added products (xylitol, arabinose) and energy carriers (bioethanol, biogas) with three PhD students. His research group also performs techno-economic evaluations of biomass conversion processes, primarily investigating the biochemical route. Miklós Gyalai-Korpos, PhD graduated from Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) in 2007 with MSc in bioengineering. Between 2007 and 2010 he participated in the doctoral school program of BME working on second generation bioethanol production, then in 2012 he successfully defended his PhD dissertation. During the doctoral school he was involved in education too, giving lectures on bioenergy and supervising undergraduate students. Between 2010 and 2013 he was employed by the Ministry of National Development of Hungary at the department responsible for long term energy policy and international energy relations. He participated in the drafting of the National Energy Strategy approved by the Hungarian Parliament in 2011. These experiences helped him to gain a complex insight into the energy landscape with emphasis on sustainable energy alternatives. In April, 2013 he joined the Climate-KIC Central Hungary team. András Molnár, PhD is a Research Associate at Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, working in the area of agricultural and rural development policy assessments, recommendation, data analysis. He also works at National FADN Liaison Agency. He has strong competence on the field of sustainability assessment, with particular emphasis on climate change and bioenergy. He has been actively involved in FP6 and FP7 projects on the field of sustainability and sustainable farm management of soils. As a short term expert, he contributed to biomass project feedstock feasibility studies and in various policy assessments related to renewable energy. His PhD thesis analysed the possibilities of a new sustainable assessment method in the agricultural sector. In 2009 he participated in the “Intensive Program in Biorenewables” summer school at Iowa State University, Ames IA, USA with a certificate of excellence. Gábor Dénes Szabó is an economist graduated from Corvinus University of Budapest (CUB) in 2009 with MSc in economics, specialized in Environmental Management and Rural Development. During the last year of his MSc in 2008, he started to work for a rural development advisory firm as economic analyst dealing with financial calculations of development plans. In 2009-2010 he worked at an agricultural research institute in Germany where he prepared cost-benefit analyses for Miscanthus production. He started his PhD studies in 2011 at CUB with a research topic of „bioenergy from the aspects of rural development” focusing mainly on economic aspects of bioenergy supply chains and second generation biorefineries. During his PhD studies he has collaborated as a research fellow with WWF Hungary, Aston University and Imperial College London. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Edward Someus1 to chapter 2.3.2 and his useful advices on biochar production and regulation, as well as Dóra Dienes, PhD for her critical proofreading of the whole document. 1 3R Zero Emission Pyrolysis processing & carbon refinery, http://www.3ragrocarbon.com 2 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2 General overview ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 The drivers of the bio based economy .................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Environmental and climatic drivers ................................................................................. 7 2.1.2 Economic drivers ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1.3 Policy drivers in the EU & the USA .................................................................................. 9 2.2 Supply side – sustainable biomass sources ........................................................................... 12 2.3 The conversion – routes and platform products ................................................................... 15 2.3.1 Feedstock dependent routes ......................................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Feedstock independent routes ...................................................................................... 21 2.4 Emerging market for bioproducts ......................................................................................... 24 2.4.1 Case of drop-in chemicals – analogues for the oil refinery ........................................... 24 2.4.2 Novel products .............................................................................................................. 25 2.5 Vision ..................................................................................................................................... 28 3 Climate-KIC and its bioeconomy platform .................................................................................... 29 3.1 European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) ....................................................... 29 3.2 Climate-KIC ............................................................................................................................ 30 3.3 Bio-economy platform........................................................................................................... 31 4 Hungary’s relevance in the bioeconomy ....................................................................................... 33 4.1 Methodology of the survey ................................................................................................... 33 4.2 Relevant national policy documents – assessing the drivers ................................................ 34 4.2.1 Renewable Energy – Hungary’s Renewable Energy Utilisation Action Plan ................. 34 4.2.2 National Energy Strategy 2030 ...................................................................................... 35 4.2.3 Hungarian National Environmental Technology Innovation Strategy ........................... 35 4.2.4 Darányi Ignác Plan Framework Programme for the Implementation of the National Rural Development Strategy ......................................................................................................... 36 4.2.5 National Research and Development and Innovation Strategy 2020 ........................... 36 4.2.6 New Széchenyi Development Plan ................................................................................ 37 4.3 Supply side assessment ......................................................................................................... 37 4.3.1 Sustainable biomass potential of Hungary .................................................................... 37 4.3.2 Available literature and data gaps ................................................................................. 41 4.3.3 Stakeholders in feedstock data analysis ........................................................................ 41 4.3.4 Opportunities and challenges of stakeholder engagement .......................................... 42 4.3.5 Addressing the feedstock needs of KBioE projects ....................................................... 43 4.4 Converting biomass into value-added products in Hungary ................................................. 43 4.4.1 Overview of existing processing plants and refineries .................................................. 43 4.4.2 Key R+D stakeholders and research centres ................................................................. 55 4.4.3 Industry engagements: Clusters and industry associations .......................................... 64 3 4.4.4 Addressing the data and refining needs of KBioE projects ........................................... 68 4.5 Demand side assessment of bioeconomy products in Hungary ........................................... 69 4.5.1 Market assessment to establish range of substitutable products ................................ 69 4.5.2 Demand side stakeholder engagement ........................................................................ 69 4.5.3 Gaps and possibilities – potential connection points to KBioE ..................................... 69 4.6 Promoting KBioE and bioeconomy in Hungary ..................................................................... 69 4.6.1 Stakeholders
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geothermal Development in Hungary Country Update Report 2000–2002
    GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT IN HUNGARY COUNTRY UPDATE REPORT 2000–2002 Miklós Árpási Hungarian Geothermal Association Lupény u. 3/B. H-1026, Budapest, Hungary ABSTRACT Information is provided on the status of the geothermal energy utilization – direct use – in Hungary with emphasis on developments between 2000–2002. Level of utilization of geothermal energy in the World has been increased in this period. Geothermal energy was the leading producer with 70% of the total electricity production of the renewables energy sources (wind. solar, geothermal and tidal) followed by wind energy with 28% of the electricity production. The current cost in USD¢/kWh of direct heat use from biomass is 1–5, geothermal 0,5–5 and solar heating 3–20. The parameters of direct use in Hungary were decreased in this period and the proportion of geothermal energy utilization in the energy balance of Hungary, despite the significance proven dynamic reserves (with reinjection) of 380 Mm3/a with heat content of 63,5 PJ/a at ∆T = 40 oC is remained very low (0,25%). The utilization of the geothermal energy only for direct use, despite of the possibility of production of geothermal fluids with surface temperature higher than 100oC, no electricity has been generated. Geothermal energy utilization for direct use is estimated to 324,5 MWt of geothermal capacity and to currently supply 2804 TJ/a of utilized heat energy through direct application in Hungary, by December 31, 2002. Geothermal heat pumps represent about 4,0 MWt of installed capacity. The quantity of produced thermal water for direct use in year 2002 was approximately 15.0 million cu.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative and Sustainable Energy Scenarios for Hungary
    Summary Report | Wuppertal, June 2016 Alternative and Sustainable Energy Scenarios for Hungary for Greens / EFA Group – European Parliament Authors Wuppertal Institute: Prof. Dr. Stefan Lechtenböhmer Magdolna Prantner Clemens Schneider Authors Energiaklub: Orsolya Fülöp Fanni Sáfián With support from: Dr. Karin Arnold Benjamin Best Mathis Buddeke Frank Merten Willington Ortiz Ole Soukup Alternative and Sustainable Energy Scenarios for Hungary June 2016 Table of contents Table of contents 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Modelling of future energy systems 5 2.1 WISEE energy system simulation model 5 2.2 EnergyPLAN 7 3 Scenarios 8 3.1 Assumptions of the NUCLEAR scenario 8 3.2 Assumptions of the Green scenario 8 3.3 Assumptions of the INTER scenarios 9 4 Available technical RES potentials until 2050 10 4.1 Wind 11 4.2 Solar photovoltaic 11 4.3 Biomass 12 5 Comparison of the scenarios 13 5.1 Power generation 13 5.2 Energy efficiency 15 5.3 Renewable energy 16 5.3.1 Shares in TPES and electricity generation 17 5.3.2 Electricity export – import balance 18 5.4 Energy related CO2 emissions 21 5.5 Cost effects of the electricity production in various scenarios 22 5.6 Final energy demand 24 6 Policy recommendations 27 7 References 29 2 | Wuppertal Institut & Energiaklub Summary Report Error! Use the Home tab to apply Überschrift 1 to the text that you want to appear here. 1 Introduction On December 12th 2015, 195 nations reached the Paris Agreement at COP 21, aiming to combat climate change. A key element of the agreement is the long-term goal of limit- ing global warming to “well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels”.
    [Show full text]
  • Cejoc Spring 2018.Indd
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Surpassing the era of disengaged acceptance: The future of public discourse on nuclear energy Gabor Sarlos RMIT UNIVERSITY, VIETNAM Gabor Sarlos, Mariann Fekete UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED, HUNGARY DOI: 10.19195/1899-5101.11.1(20).5 ABSTRACT: Both the United Kingdom and Hungary run ambitious nuclear power plans to keep nuclear power as an important element of their energy mixes. Th e objective of the analysis is to identify if there is the intent and the possibility for a diff erent form of public engagement in shaping the nuclear future. Th e study builds on the comparative analysis of the cases of Hungary and the United Kingdom. Th e ‘communication packages’ theory serves as reference of comparison. Th e study fi nds that changing social value sets and communication technology developments create challenges to governments in securing support for the nuclear agenda. Th is challenge creates an opportunity for members of the public with ‘reluctant acceptance’ of the nuclear agenda. Building on global uncertainty, challenges to the prevailing political and economic status quo, together with the grow- ing infl uence of social media might assist the public to become vocal in their opinions about nucle- ar energy. KEYWORDS: nuclear discourse, disengagement, social values, communication package. INTRODUCTION Th e current study aims to provide an insight and comparison into the public percep- tion of nuclear energy of the UK and of Hungary. It studies the relevance of the concept of ‘public sphere’ and of ‘communication packages’ in the context of current, European discourse. A critical analysis of relevant theories and of contemporary literature sets the context of the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary - Regulatory Reform in Electricity 1999
    Hungary - Regulatory Reform in Electricity 1999 The Review is one of a series of country reports carried out under the OECD’s Regulatory Reform Programme, in response to the 1997 mandate by OECD Ministers. This report on regulatory reform in electricity in Hungary was principally prepared by Mr. Gudrun Lammers for the OECD. BACKGROUND REPORT ON REGULATORY REFORM IN THE ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY* *This report was principally prepared by Gudrun Lammers of the International Energy Agency. It has benefited from extensive comments provided by colleagues throughout the IEA and OECD Secretariats, by the Government of Hungary, and by Member countries as part of the peer review process. This report was peer reviewed in October 1999 by the Standing Group on Long Term Co-operation of the IEA. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Historical overview 1.2. Generation 1.3. Future investment needs 1.4. Transmission, interconnection and international trade 1.5. Distribution and supply 2. REGULATORY REFORM IN THE HUNGARIAN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRY 2.1. The current functional model of the Hungarian power industry: the IPP approach 2.2. The future functional model of the ESI: competition? 3. EVALUATION 3.1. Restructuring and privatisation 3.2. Regulation 3.3. Effects of regulatory reform to date 3.4. The introduction of competition 3.5. Comparative assessment of Hungary’s regulatory reforms Independent? 4. CONCLUSION 5. RECOMMENDATIONS NOTES Tables 1. The eight largest power generating companies in Hungary 2. Size distribution of generating units in Hungary 3. Capacity and load in the Hungarian electricity supply industry 4. Hungary’s regional distribution and supply companies 5a.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Final Programme
    "Safe Tunnelling for the City and for the Environment" FINAL PROGRAMME ITA–AITES WORLD TUNNEL CONGRESS 2009 and the 35th ITA–AITES General Assembly Budapest, Hungary May 23–28, 2009 WTC 2009 BUDAPEST Contents Message from the Minister of Transport, Telecommunication and Energy4 Message from the Lord Mayor of the Capital City Budapest 5 Message from the President of the Hungarian Tunnelling Association 6 Organising Associations and Sponsors 7 Committees 7 Partner Organisations 9 General Assembly9 Working Group Meetings 9 Congress Main Topics 12 Opening & Closing 12 Keynote Lectures 12 Programme at a Glance 14 Open Session 16 Technical Information for WTC2009 Speakers and Poster Presenters 16 Legend of the Congress Level 17 WTC 2009 – Detailed Programme of the Technical Sessions 18 Final List of Accepted Poster Presentations 28 Technical Exhibition and Sponsorship 35 List of Exhibitors 35 GENERAL INFORMATION 37 Date and Venue 37 WTC2009 Secretariat 37 ITA-AITES Secretariat Office 37 Conference Secretariat 37 Conference Assistance 37 Transportation 37 Foreign Exchange, Banking Facilities 37 Climate and Weather 38 Electricity38 Liabilityand Insurance 38 Official Language 38 Registration and Information Desk 38 Badges 38 On-site Registration 38 Programme Changes 39 Message 39 Internet Corner 39 Car Parking 39 Mobile Phones 39 Smoking 39 First Aid and Pharmacy39 Catering Services during WTC 39 Cancellation Policy39 Accommodation Information 42 Social Events 44 Optional and Accompanying Persons’ Programmes 44 Technical Tours 44 Post-Congress
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Update of Hungary 2000-2004
    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2005 Antalya, Turkey, 24-29 April 2005 Geothermal Update of Hungary 2000–2004 Miklós Árpási Founder Chairman of the Hungarian Geothermal Association – Independent Expert Keywords: country update, geothermal pilot projects, medium temperature range (30–100 oC). According to economical aspects, heat pumps different assessments of its geothermal resources (Boldizsár, 1967; Bobok et al., 1988 and Árpási, 1992) ABSTRACT Hungary has the biggest underground thermal water reserves and low-to-medium enthalpy geothermal potential Information is provided on the status of geothermal direct in Europe. heat use in Hungary, with emphasis on developments from 2000 to 2004. 2. GEOTHERMAL UPDATE During the four years since WGC2000 there have been 12 The main data of geothermal energy utilization for direct new geothermal developments in Hungary. uses in Hungary by January 1, 2004 as reported by Árpási, shown in Table 1. The geothermal energy was utilized in direct use, no electricity has been generated. As a result of the analysis for the geothermal update of Hungary by 1 January, 2004 the following conclusions can The summarized data relative to direct use in Hungary in be drawn: Hungary in slight degree was increased (utilization of geothermal heat was decreased in agriculture and increased a) the geothermal energy is utilized in the form of in communal heating and SHW supply). direct use (Table 2) The main consumer of geothermal heat is remain the b) areas of the direct use agriculture, however is remained among the leaders on the utilization of geothermal heat in the World. agricultural utilization Geothermal energy utilization is estimated to be 342,5 MW, communal use (space heating and domestic hot water) of geothermal power and it currently supplies 2905,2 TJ/yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in Hungary - Potential, Benefits and Barriers Director Jannik Termansen, Vestas Wind Systems A/S
    Wind Energy in Hungary - Potential, Benefits and Barriers Director Jannik Termansen, Vestas Wind Systems A/S vestas.com Reaching the EU RES target by 2020 may be demanding Setting the scene From 4,3% to 13% Source: EU Commission 2009 Setting the scene Fraunhofer ISI: “With business as usual RES policies Hungary will not reach her 13% RES target” • By retaining current RES support a doubling of current RES deployment can be expected by 2020 Link to the Fraunhofer • Corresponding to a share of 8.7% RES in gross final model energy demand by 2020 • Consequently, facing a huge gap in size of 4.3% of gross final demand, Hungary would fail to fulfill the 2020 RES target of 13% Source: Fraunhofer Institute 2009, Future pathways for renewable electricity in EU Setting the scene Fraunhofer ISI: “With strengthened RES policies Hungary can reach her 13% RES target" • Effective and efficient RES support with strengthened national RES support would allow Hungary to speed up Link to the RES deployment significantly Fraunhofer results • With strengthened national policies Hungary achieves a 2020 RES deployment corresponding to 13% of gross final energy demand – equal to the agreed Hungarian EU target Source: Fraunhofer Institute 2009, Future pathways for renewable electricity in EU The potential We believe that Wind Energy represents a key technology option for Hungarian power generation in reaching the EU RES target of 13% by 2020 Because Wind Energy is… Competitive Predictable Independent Fast Clean The potential And Hungary offers good wind sites
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary Empowered Lives
    RENEWABLE ENERGY SNAPSHOT: Hungary Empowered lives. Resilient nations. General Country Electricity Generating Information Capacity 2012 Population: 9,943,755 Surface Area: 93,030 km² 9,996 MW 9.3% Capital City: Budapest Total Installed Capacity RE Share GDP (2012): $ 125.5 billion GDP Per Capita (2012): $ 12,622 930 MW Installed RE Capacity WB Ease of Doing Business: 54 Biomass Solar PV Wind Small Hydro Installed Renewable Electricity 1 Capacity 2012 in MW 583 3.7 329.4 14 Technical Potential for Installed 2,400 86,400 600 100 Renewable Electricity Capacity in MW Sources : ESHA (2010); World Bank (2014); EurObserv’Er (2013); WWEA (2013); EBRD (2009); EC (2013); EWEA (2013); Renewable Facts (2013); EIA (2013); Hoogwijk and Graus (2008); Hoogwijk (2004); JRC (2011); and UNDP calculations. Key information about renewable energy in Hungary Hungary’s share of renewable energy in the total installed electricity capacity stands at almost 10 percent. But compared to its huge renewable energy potential, only a small percentage has so far been utilized. With the in - evitable closure of old fossil-fuel power plants, developing that renewable energy potential is particularly im - portant, because additional capacity of between 6,000 MW and 8,000 MW is required to meet the increasing demand (IAEA, 2012). The major promotion instrument for renewable energy is a technology-specific feed-in tariff, which is dependent on the commissioning date, the installed capacity and the time at which electricity is 1 Value is from 2010 RENEWABLE ENERGY SNAPSHOT:
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Performance Contracting in Hungary, Poland, and Slovakza
    THE FEASIBILITY OF PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING IN HUNGARY, POLAND, AND SLOVAKZA Prepared by Kiona International, Inc. Under Subcontract to ICF Resources Incorporated U.S. Agency for International Development Contract No. EUR-0028-C-00-2031-00 July 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION ......................... 1 SECTION 1. PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING ............. 1-1 Performance Contracting in Retrospect ... ....1-2 Typical ESCO Services ........... ....1-4 Country Benefits .............. ....1-5 Benefits to In-Country Businesses ... ....1-6 Customer Advantages ............ ....1-7 Lessons Learned in the West ........ ....1-8 Free Audits .............. ....1-8 Too Much; Too Soon .......... ....1-8 Getting an Accountable Energy Engineer ....1-9 Cost-Effectiveness .......... ...1-9 Utility Role ............. ... 1-10 Underestimating the Key Role Management and Occupants Have. Especially O&M Staff ...... ... 1-10 The Vital Communications Link .... ... 1-10 SECTION 2 . KEY INSTITUTIONAL AND ECONOMIC ELEMENTS .....2-1 Country Conditions ...................2-1 Political & Economic Elements .............2-1 Energy & Environmental Elements ............ 2-5 CustomerElements ...................2-6 SECTION 3 . HUNGARY . ECONOMIC. POLITICAL. ENERGY AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS GERMANE TO ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING ............... 3-1 Macroeconomic/Political Conditions in Hungary .....3-1 Economic uSnapshotfland Apparent Trends; September 1994 ....................... 3-2 Macroeconomic Prospects and Outlook .....3-2 Implications for a
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Barge
    ENERGY BARGE Building a Green Energy and Logistics Belt Project Code: DTP1-175-3.2 Deliverable 3.1.1 Compendium of national market study reports May 31st, 2017 Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF) For the implementation of the project “ENERGY BARGE – Building a Green Energy and Logistics Belt” a subsidy is awarded from the European Regional Development Fund under the Danube Transnational Program. The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Regional Development Fund is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF) Table of Content Figures ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Tables ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 I. About the ENERGY BARGE project ........................................................................................................... 5 II. About this document ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Background of the deliverable ................................................................................................................... 8 2. Introduction to biomass and bioenergy markets in the Danube
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass and Agriculture D L C
    _it E d e it s io w n o r ly B n e O e D d l C C a u E E e e O Biomass and Agriculture O R s n n e A A r u L e c t SUSTAINABILITY, MARKETS AND POLICIES The 21st century could see the switch from the fossil fuel to the biological based economy. « Agriculture could be rejuvenated as a source of bioenergy and biomaterials, as well as providing food and fibres. The relative costs of fossil fuels and agricultural biomass will clearly play a key role. Projected prices of fossil fuels over the next 30 to 50 years may ensure the dominance of the hydrocarbon economy. Even so, the price of bioplastics is competitive with petroleum based plastics at the top end of the market. Also, biofuels, such as ethanol are easier to exploit than fuel cells for their market potential. There is growing interest by both governments and the private sector in expanding markets for energy and materials produced from agricultural biomass. But what is the contribution of agricultural biomass to sustainable development? What issues should be addressed by policies? What are governments actually doing and how effective are they? The OECD Workshop on Biomass and Agriculture addressed these questions. It concluded that Biomass countries must take care in assessing the costs and benefits of promoting agricultural biomass production, to ensure that: it is economically efficient and profitable for farmers by responding to market needs; it is environmentally effective; and it can meet broader policy goals for agriculture, and Agriculture energy, industry, social welfare, trade and sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverging Voices, Converging Policies: the Visegrad States' Reactions to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict
    Diverging Voices, Converging Policies: The Visegrad States’ Reactions to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict Jacek Kucharczyk and Grigorij Mesežnikov (eds.) DIVERGING VOICES, CONVERGING POLICIES: THE VISEGRAD STATES’ REACTIONS TO THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT HEINRICH-BÖLL-STIFTUNG Diverging Voices, Converging Policies: The Visegrad States’ Reactions to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict Edited by Jacek Kucharczyk, Grigorij Mesežnikov Commissioned by the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Diverging Voices, Converging Policies: The Visegrad States’ Reactions to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict Edited by Jacek Kucharczyk and Grigorij Mesežnikov Commissioned by the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung offices in Prague and Warsaw Printed in Warsaw, 2015. Publisher: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Co-publishers: Europeum – Institute for European Policy (Czech Republic), Institute of Public Affairs (Poland), Institute for Public Affairs (Slovakia), Political Capital Policy Research & Consulting Institute (Hungary) Copy editing: Evan Mellander Layout and cover image: Kateřina Kubánková Copyright to the original image on the cover page: VGstockstudio/Shutterstock This material is licensed under Creative Commons “Attribution- NonCommercial 4.0 International” (CC BY-NC 4.0). For the licence agreement, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ and a summary (not a substitute) at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. The findings and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. ISBN: 978-80-906270-2-4 (Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Prague, Opatovická 28, Praha 1, 110 00, Czech Republic) 978-83-61340-29-4 (Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Warsaw, ul. Żurawia 45, IIIp., 00-680 Warsaw, Poland) 978-80-86993-13-3 (Europeum – Institute for European Policy, Rytířská 539/31 Praha 1, 110 00, Czech Republic) 978-83-7689-250-4 (Institute of Public Affairs, ul.
    [Show full text]