Fishery Conservation and Management § 665.421

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fishery Conservation and Management § 665.421 Fishery Conservation and Management § 665.421 § 665.404 Permits. bottomfish MUS within the CNMI me- dium and large vessel bottomfish pro- (a) Applicability—(1) Guam large vessel. The owner of any large vessel used to hibited areas, as defined in § 665.403(b). fish for, land, or transship Mariana (g) Retain, land, possess, sell, or offer bottomfish MUS shoreward of the for sale, shoreward of the outer bound- outer boundary of the Guam subarea ary of the CNMI management subarea, must have a permit issued under this Mariana bottomfish MUS that were section, and the permit must be reg- harvested in violation of § 665.405(f), ex- istered for use with that vessel. cept that Mariana bottomfish MUS (2) Commonwealth of the Northern that are harvested legally may be Mariana Islands (CNMI) commercial. transferred to a receiving vessel shore- The owner of any vessel used to com- ward of the outer boundary of the mercially fish for, transship, receive, CNMI medium and large vessel or land Mariana bottomfish MUS bottomfish prohibited area as defined shoreward of the outer boundary of the in § 665.403(b). CNMI management subarea must have (h) Falsify or fail to make, keep, a permit issued under this section, and maintain, or submit a Federal logbook the permit must be registered for use as required under § 665.14(b) when using with that vessel. a vessel to engage in commercial fish- (b) Submission. An application for a ing for Mariana bottomfish MUS shore- permit required under this section ward of the outer boundary of the must be submitted to PIRO as de- CNMI management subarea in viola- scribed in § 665.13. tion of § 665.14(b). § 665.405 Prohibitions. § 665.406 Gear restrictions. In addition to the general prohibi- (a) Bottom trawls and bottom set tions specified in § 600.725 of this chap- gillnets. Fishing for bottomfish with ter and § 665.15, it is unlawful for any bottom trawls and bottom set gillnets person to do any of the following: is prohibited. (a) Fish for Mariana bottomfish MUS (b) Possession of gear. Possession of a using gear prohibited under § 665.406. bottom trawl and bottom set gillnet by (b) Use a large vessel that does not any vessel having a permit under have a valid Guam bottomfish permit § 665.404 or otherwise established to be registered for use with that vessel to fishing for bottomfish in the manage- fish for, land, or transship Mariana ment subareas is prohibited. bottomfish MUS shoreward of the (c) Poisons and explosives. The posses- outer boundary of the Guam manage- sion or use of any poisons, explosives, ment subarea of the bottomfish fishery or intoxicating substances for the pur- management area in violation of pose of harvesting bottomfish is pro- § 665.404(a). hibited. (c) Use a large vessel to fish for Mar- iana bottomfish MUS within the Guam § 665.407 At-sea observer coverage. large vessel bottomfish prohibited All fishing vessels subject to §§ 665.400 area, as defined in § 665.403(a). through 665.407 must carry an observer (d) Land or transship, shoreward of when directed to do so by the Regional the outer boundary of the Guam man- Administrator. agement subarea of the bottomfish fishery management area, Mariana §§ 665.408–665.419 [Reserved] bottomfish MUS that were harvested in violation of § 665.405(c). § 665.420 Mariana coral reef ecosystem (e) Use a vessel to fish commercially fisheries. [Reserved] for Mariana bottomfish MUS shore- ward of the outer boundary of the § 665.421 Definitions. CNMI management subarea without a As used in §§ 665.420 through 665.439: valid CNMI commercial bottomfish Mariana coral reef ecosystem manage- permit registered for use with that ves- ment unit species (Mariana coral reef eco- sel, in violation of § 665.404(a)(2). system MUS) means all of the Currently (f) Use a medium or large vessel, as Harvested Coral Reef Taxa and Poten- defined in § 665.12, to fish for Mariana tially Harvested Coral Reef Taxa listed 417 § 665.421 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–14 Edition) in this section and which spend the ma- than or equal to 50 fathoms in total jority of their non-pelagic (post-settle- depth. ment) life stages within waters less Mariana Currently Harvested Coral Reef Taxa: Local name (Chamorro/ Family name Carolinian) English common name Scientific name Acanthuridae (Surgeonfishes) ................................................ orange-spot surgeonfish ........ Acanthurus olivaceus. hugupao dangulo/mowagh ..... yellowfin surgeonfish .............. Acanthurus xanthopterus. Kichu/limell ............................. convict tang ............................ Acanthurus triostegus. eye-striped surgeonfish .......... Acanthurus dussumieri. blue-lined surgeon ................. Acanthurus nigroris. whitebar surgeonfish .............. Acanthurus leucopareius. whitebar surgeonfish .............. Acanthurus leucopareius. Hiyok/filaang ........................... blue-banded surgeonfish ....... Acanthurus lineatus. blackstreak surgeonfish ......... Acanthurus nigricauda. whitecheek surgeonfish ......... Acanthurus nigricans. white-spotted surgeonfish ...... Acanthurus guttatus. ringtail surgeonfish ................. Acanthurus blochii. brown surgeonfish .................. Acanthurus nigrofuscus. mimic surgeonfish .................. Acanthurus pyroferus. Yellow tang ............................ Zebrasoma flavescens. striped bristletooth .................. Ctenochaetus striatus. twospot bristletooth ................ Ctenochaetus binotatus. tataga/igh-falafal ..................... bluespine unicornfish ............. Naso unicornus. hangon/bwulaalay .................. orangespine unicornfish ......... Naso lituratus. humpnose unicornfish ............ Naso tuberosus. black tongue unicornfish ........ Naso hexacanthus. bignose unicornfish ................ Naso vlamingii. whitemargin unicornfish ......... Naso annulatus. spotted unicornfish ................. Naso brevirostris. humpback unicornfish ............ Naso brachycentron. gray unicornfish ...................... Naso caesius. Balistidae (Triggerfishes) ......... ................................................ titan triggerfish ....................... Balistoides viridescens. clown triggerfish ..................... Balistoides conspicillum. orange striped triggerfish ....... Balistapus undulatus. pinktail triggerfish ................... Melichthys vidua. black triggerfish ...................... Melichthys niger. blue triggerfish ....................... Pseudobalistes fuscus. Picassofish ............................. Rhinecanthus aculeatus. wedged Picassofish ............... Balistoides rectangulus. bridled triggerfish ................... Sufflamen fraenatus. Carangidae (Jacks) ................. atulai/peti ................................ Bigeye scad ........................... Selar crumenophthalmus. mackerel scad ........................ Decapterus macarellus. Carcharhinidae (Sharks) .......... grey reef shark ....................... Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos. silvertip shark ......................... Carcharhinus albimarginatus. Galapagos shark .................... Carcharhinus galapagensis. blacktip reef shark .................. Carcharhinus melanopterus. whitetip reef shark .................. Triaenodon obesus. Holocentridae (Solderfish/ saksak/mweel ......................... bigscale soldierfish ................. Myripristis berndti. Squirrelfish. sagamelon .............................. bronze soldierfish ................... Myripristis adusta. sagamelon .............................. blotcheye soldierfish .............. Myripristis murdjan. sagamelon .............................. brick soldierfish ...................... Myripristis amaena. sagamelon .............................. scarlet soldierfish ................... Myripristis pralinia. sagamelon .............................. violet soldierfish ..................... Myripristis violacea. sagamelon .............................. whitetip soldierfish .................. Myripristis vittata. sagamelon .............................. yellowfin soldierfish ................ Myripristis chryseres. sagamelon .............................. pearly soldierfish .................... Myripristis kuntee. sagamelon .............................. tailspot squirrelfish ................. Sargocentron caudimaculatum. file-lined squirrelfish ............... Sargocentron microstoma. chalak ..................................... crown squirrelfish ................... Sargocentron diadema. sagsag/leet ............................. blue-lined squirrelfish ............. Sargocentron tiere. sisiok ...................................... saber or long jaw squirrelfish Sargocentron spiniferum. sagsag/leet ............................. spotfin squirrelfish .................. Neoniphon spp. Kuhliidae (Flagtails) ................. ................................................ barred flag-tail ........................ Kuhlia mugil. Kyphosidae (Rudderfish) ......... Guili ........................................ rudderfish ............................... Kyphosus biggibus. Guili/schpwul .......................... rudderfish ............................... Kyphosus cinerascens. guilen puengi/reel ................... rudderfish ............................... Kyphosus vaigienses. Labridae (Wrasses) ................. tangison/maam ....................... floral wrasse ........................... Cheilinus chlorourus. tangison/maam ....................... napoleon wrasse .................... Cheilinus undulatus. lalacha mamate/Porou ........... triple-tail wrasse ..................... Cheilinus trilobatus. harlequin
Recommended publications
  • Balistapus Undulatus (Park, 1797) Frequent Synonyms / Misidentifications: None / None
    click for previous page Tetraodontiformes: Balistidae 3919 Balistapus undulatus (Park, 1797) Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / None. FAO names: En - Orangestriped triggerfish. Diagnostic characters: Body deep, compressed. Large scale plates forming regular rows; and scales of cheek in an even, relatively complete covering. Scales enlarged above pectoral-fin base and just behind gill opening to form a flexible tympanum; scales of caudal peduncle with 2 longitudinal rows of large anteriorly projecting spines. No groove in front of eye. Mouth terminal; teeth pointed, the central pair in each jaw largest. First dorsal fin with III prominent spines, the first capable of being locked in an erected position by the second, the third short but distinct; dorsal-fin rays 24 to 27 (usually 25 or 26); anal-fin rays 20 to 24; caudal fin slightly rounded; pectoral-fin rays 13 to 15 (usually 14). Caudal peduncle compressed. Colour: dark green to dark brown with oblique curved orange lines on posterior head and body; an oblique band of narrow blue and orange stripes from around mouth to below pectoral fins; a large round black blotch around peduncular spines; rays of soft dorsal, anal, and pectoral fins orange; caudal fin orange. Size: Maximum total length 30 cm. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Occurs in coral reefs at depths to 30 m. Feeds on various organisms, including live coral, algae, sea urchins, crabs and other crustaceans, molluscs, tunicates, and fishes. Marketed fresh and dried-salted. Distribution: Widespread in the tropical Indo-West Pacific, from East Africa, including the Red Sea, through Indonesia to the Tuamotu Islands; north to southern Japan, south to New Caledonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantas, Dolphins & Coral Reefs – a Maldives Cruise
    Mantas, Dolphins & Coral Reefs – A Maldives Cruise Naturetrek Tour Report 8 – 17 February 2019 Hawksbill Turtle Manta Ray Short-finned Pilot Whale Black-footed Anemone Fish Report & images compiled by Sara Frost Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Mantas, Dolphins & Coral Reefs – A Maldives Cruise Tour participants: Sara Frost and Chas Anderson (tour leaders) with 15 Naturetrek clients Summary Our time spent cruising around the beautiful Maldivian islands and atolls resulted in some superb marine wildlife encounters, and lovely warm evenings anchored off remote tropical islands, a dazzling variety of colourful fish, numerous turtles and dolphins and a daily visual feast of innumerable shades of turquoise! The highlight was the group’s encounter with a group of 6 Manta Rays while snorkelling. We enjoyed a morning’s excitement as the Mantas appeared and disappeared alongside us, their huge mouths wide open as they fed on the plankton, with all of the group getting fantastic close-up views! Every morning and evening, the group enjoyed a pre-breakfast and pre-dinner snorkel on coral reefs, where the colour and variety of fish was wonderful! Regal Angelfish, parrotfish, sea cucumbers, many different types of butterflyfish and wrasses, Maldive Anemonefish, reef squid, triggerfish, Moorish Idols, both White- and Black- tipped Reef Sharks and Hawksbill Turtles were just a few of the highlights! Back on board, while cruising between atolls, islands and reefs, seven confirmed species of cetacean were seen: several groups of Spinner Dolphins (including one huge group of at least 500), Pan-tropical Spotted Dolphins, both Common and Indo- Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins, plus Fraser’s Dolphins, plus Risso’s Dolphins and two groups of Pilot Whales – the first being very inquisitive and spending an hour with us spy hopping alongside the boat! All in all, it was a wonderful trip that will never be forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Enigma of the Pygmy Angelfishes from the Centropyge
    1 1 Original Article 2 After continents divide: comparative phylogeography of reef fishes from the Red 3 Sea and Indian Ocean 4 Joseph D. DiBattista1*, Michael L. Berumen2,3, Michelle R. Gaither4, Luiz A. 5 Rocha4, Jeff A. Eble5, J. Howard Choat6, Matthew T. Craig7, Derek J. Skillings1 6 and Brian W. Bowen1 7 1Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology, Kāne‘ohe, HI 96744, USA, 2Red Sea 8 Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 9 Saudi Arabia, 3 Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 10 Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA, 4Section of Ichthyology, California Academy of 11 Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA, 5Department of Biology, University of 12 West Florida, Pensacola, FL 32514, USA, 6School of Marine and Tropical 13 Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia, 7Department 14 of Marine Sciences and Environmental Studies, University of San Diego, San 15 Diego, CA 92110, USA 16 17 *Correspondence: Joseph D. DiBattista, Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. 18 Box 1346, Kāne‘ohe, HI 96744, USA. 19 E-mail: [email protected] 2 20 Running header: Phylogeography of Red Sea reef fishes 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ABSTRACT 33 Aim The Red Sea is a biodiversity hotspot characterized by unique marine fauna 34 and high endemism. This sea began forming approximately 24 million years ago 35 with the separation of the African and Arabian plates, and has been characterized 36 by periods of desiccation, hypersalinity and intermittent connection to the Indian 3 37 Ocean. We aim to evaluate the impact of these events on the genetic architecture 38 of the Red Sea reef fish fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • First Quantitative Ecological Study of the Hin Pae Pinnacle, Mu Ko Chumphon, Thailand
    Ramkhamhaeng International Journal of Science and Technology (2020) 3(3): 37-45 ORIGINAL PAPER First quantitative ecological study of the Hin Pae pinnacle, Mu Ko Chumphon, Thailand Makamas Sutthacheepa*, Sittiporn Pengsakuna, Supphakarn Phoaduanga, Siriluck Rongprakhona , Chainarong Ruengthongb, Supawadee Hamaneec, Thamasak Yeemina, a Marine Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Huamark, Bangkok, Thailand b Chumphon Marine National Park Operation Center 1, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Chumphon Province, Thailand c School of Business Administration, Sripatum University, Jatujak, Bangkok *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 21 August 2020 / Revised: 21 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 October 2020 Abstract. The Western Gulf of Thailand holds a rich set protection. These ecosystems also play significant of coral reef communities, especially at the islands of Mu roles in the Gulf of Thailand regarding public Ko Chumphon Marine National Park, being of great importance to Thailand’s biodiversity and economy due awareness of coastal resources conservation to its touristic potential. The goal of this study was to (Cesar, 2000; Yeemin et al., 2006; Wilkinson, provide a first insight on the reef community of Hin Pae, 2008). Consequently, coral reefs hold significant a pinnacle located 20km off the shore of Chumphon benefits to the socioeconomic development in Province, a known SCUBA diving site with the potential Thailand. to become a popular tourist destination. The survey was conducted during May 2019, when a 100m transect was used to characterize the habitat. Hin Pae holds a rich reef Chumphon Province has several marine tourism community with seven different coral taxa, seven hotspots, such as the islands in Mu Ko Chumphon invertebrates, and 44 fish species registered to the National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Partitioning No-Take Marine Reserve (NTMR) and Benthic Habitat Effects on Density of Small and Large-Bodied Tropical Wrasses
    Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses Citation: Russ, Garry R., Lowe, Jake R., Rizzari, Justin R., Bergseth, Brock J. and Alcala, Angel C. 2017, Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses, PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 12 (e0188515), pp. 1-21. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188515 © 2017, The Authors Reproduced by Deakin University under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence Downloaded from DRO: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30112406 DRO Deakin Research Online, Deakin University’s Research Repository Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B RESEARCH ARTICLE Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses Garry R. Russ1,2☯, Jake R. Lowe1☯*, Justin R. Rizzari1,2,3, Brock J. Bergseth2, Angel C. Alcala4 1 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia, 2 Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia, 3 Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 4 Silliman University Angelo King Center for a1111111111 Research and Environmental Management (SUAKCREM), Dumaguete City, Negros, Philippines a1111111111 a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 Abstract No-take marine reserves (NTMRs) are increasingly implemented for fisheries management OPEN ACCESS and biodiversity conservation. Yet, assessing NTMR effectiveness depends on partitioning Citation: Russ GR, Lowe JR, Rizzari JR, Bergseth the effects of NTMR protection and benthic habitat on protected species.
    [Show full text]
  • American Samoa Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 2017
    ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT: AMERICAN SAMOA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN 2017 Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813 PHONE: (808) 522-8220 FAX: (808) 522-8226 www.wpcouncil.org The ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT for the AMERICAN SAMOA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN 2017 was drafted by the Fishery Ecosystem Plan Team. This is a collaborative effort primarily between the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, NMFS-Pacific Island Fisheries Science Center, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Division of Aquatic Resources (HI) Department of Marine and Wildlife Resources (AS), Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources (Guam), and Division of Fish and Wildlife (CNMI). This report attempts to summarize annual fishery performance looking at trends in catch, effort and catch rates as well as provide a source document describing various projects and activities being undertaken on a local and federal level. The report also describes several ecosystem considerations including fish biomass estimates, biological indicators, protected species, habitat, climate change, and human dimensions. Information like marine spatial planning and best scientific information available for each fishery are described. This report provides a summary of annual catches relative to the Annual Catch Limits established by the Council in collaboration with the local fishery management agencies. Edited By: Marlowe Sabater, Asuka Ishizaki, Thomas Remington, and Sylvia Spalding, WPRFMC. This document can be cited as follows: WPRFMC, 2018. Annual Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the American Samoa Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 2017. Sabater, M., Ishizaki, A., Remington, T., Spalding, S. (Eds.) Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Life on the Coral Reef
    Coral Reef Teacher’s Guide Life on the Coral Reef Life on the Coral Reef THE CORAL REEF ECOSYSTEM The muddy silt drifts out to sea, covering the nearby Coral reefs provide the basis for the most productive coral reefs. Some corals can remove the silt, but many shallow water ecosystem in the world. An ecosystem cannot. If the silt is not washed off within a short pe- is a group of living things, such as coral, algae and riod of time by the current, the polyps suffocate and fishes, along with their non-living environment, such die. Not only the rainforest is destroyed, but also the as rocks, water, and sand. Each influences the other, neighboring coral reef. and both are necessary for the successful maintenance of life. If one is thrown out of balance by either natural Reef Zones or human-made causes, then the survival of the other Coral reefs are not uniform, but are shaped by the is seriously threatened. forces of the sea and the structure of the sea floor into DID YOU KNOW? All of the Earth’s ecosystems are a series of different parts or reef zones. Understand- interrelated, forming a shell of life that covers the ing these zones is useful in understanding the ecol- entire planet – the biosphere. For instance, if too many ogy of coral reefs. Keep in mind that these zones can trees are cut down in the rainforest, soil from the for- blend gradually into one another, and that sometimes est is washed by rain into rivers that run to the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecomorphology of Feeding in Coral Reef Fishes
    Ecomorphology of Feeding in Coral Reef Fishes Peter C. Wainwright David R. Bellwood Center for Population Biology Centre for Coral Reef Biodiversity University of California at Davis School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture Davis, California 95616 James Cook University Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia I. Introduction fish biology. We have attempted to identify generalities, II. How Does Morphology Influence Ecology? the major patterns that seem to cut across phylogenetic III. The Biomechanical Basis of Feeding Performance and geographic boundaries. We begin by constructing IV. Ecological Consequences of Functional a rationale for how functional morphology can be used Morphology to enhance our insight into some long-standing eco- V. Prospectus logical questions. We then review the fundamental me- chanical issues associated with feeding in fishes, and the basic design features of the head that are involved in prey capture and prey processing. This sets the stage I. Introduction for a discussion of how the mechanical properties of fish feeding systems have been modified during reef fish di- nce an observer gets past the stunning coloration, versification. With this background, we consider some O surely no feature inspires wonder in coral reef of the major conclusions that have been drawn from fishes so much as their morphological diversity. From studies of reef fish feeding ecomorphology. Because of large-mouthed groupers, to beaked parrotfish, barbeled space constraints we discuss only briefly the role of goatfish, long-snouted trumpet fish, snaggle-toothed sensory modalities--vision, olfaction, electroreception, tusk fish, tube-mouthed planktivores, and fat-lipped and hearingmbut these are also significant and diverse sweet lips, coral reef fishes display a dazzling array elements of the feeding arsenal of coral reef fishes and of feeding structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Invertebrates As Indicators of Reef Health
    MARINE INVERTEBRATES AS INDICATORS OF REEF HEALTH A STUDY OF THE REEFS IN THE REGION OF ANDAVADOAKA, SOUTH WEST MADAGASCAR Anna Hopkins MSc Conservation Science September 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science and the Diploma of Imperial College London i ABSTRACT Coral reefs are under increasing pressure from anthropogenic threats, especially over- harvesting. Certain invertebrate species are considered indicators of ecological change and any possible disturbance to the reef can be gauged by monitoring their abundance. The densities of eight invertebrate species were measured over a four year period within three types of reef; fringing, barrier and patch, surrounding the area of Andavadoaka, Southwest Madagascar. General linear mixed effect models indicated complex patterns of abundance in relation to annual, seasonal and spatial variation in all species, with season being the weaker explanatory variable. There was no evidence of ecological disturbance in any of the reef types and echinoid densities were comparable to those found in protected areas. Acanthaster planci was found in very low densities and therefore not an ecological threat. Echinostrephus was found to be the dominant echinoid throughout the area. Harvested species T. gigas and C. tritonis were uniformly rare at all sites but compared to reefs in Southeast Asia are in healthy numbers. Holothurians have decreased in number although recent increases have been noted on patch reefs. Patch reefs were found to harbour the healthiest abundance of echinoids and harvested species. Fringing reefs had lower densities of all species possibly as a result of more intense harvesting effort.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–14 Edition) § 665.102
    § 665.102 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–14 Edition) § 665.102 [Reserved] § 665.105 At-sea observer coverage. All fishing vessels subject to §§ 665.100 § 665.103 Prohibitions. through 665.105 must carry an observer In addition to the general prohibi- when directed to do so by the Regional tions specified in § 600.725 of this chap- Administrator. ter and § 665.15, it is unlawful for any person to fish for American Samoa §§ 665.106–665.119 [Reserved] bottomfish MUS using gear prohibited under § 665.104. § 665.120 American Samoa coral reef ecosystem fisheries. [Reserved] § 665.104 Gear restrictions. § 665.121 Definitions. (a) Bottom trawls and bottom set As used in §§ 665.120 through 665.139: gillnets. Fishing for American Samoa American Samoa coral reef ecosystem bottomfish MUS with bottom trawls management unit species (American and bottom set gillnets is prohibited. Samoa coral reef ecosystem MUS) means (b) Possession of gear. The possession all of the Currently Harvested Coral of a bottom trawl or bottom set gillnet Reef Taxa and Potentially Harvested within the American Samoa fishery Coral Reef Taxa listed in this section management area is prohibited. and which spend the majority of their (c) Poisons and explosives. The posses- non-pelagic (post-settlement) life sion or use of any poisons, explosives, stages within waters less than or equal or intoxicating substances for the pur- to 50 fathoms in total depth. pose of harvesting bottomfish is pro- American Samoa Currently Har- hibited. vested Coral Reef Taxa: Family name Samoan name English common name Scientific name Acanthuridae (Surgeonfishes) afinamea ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fish Species (Pisces) of La Réunion, Including a Red List of Threatened and Declining Species
    Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie 2: 1–168; Stuttgart, 30.IV.2009. 1 Annotated checklist of the fish species (Pisces) of La Réunion, including a Red List of threatened and declining species RONALD FR ICKE , THIE rr Y MULOCHAU , PA tr ICK DU R VILLE , PASCALE CHABANE T , Emm ANUEL TESSIE R & YVES LE T OU R NEU R Abstract An annotated checklist of the fish species of La Réunion (southwestern Indian Ocean) comprises a total of 984 species in 164 families (including 16 species which are not native). 65 species (plus 16 introduced) occur in fresh- water, with the Gobiidae as the largest freshwater fish family. 165 species (plus 16 introduced) live in transitional waters. In marine habitats, 965 species (plus two introduced) are found, with the Labridae, Serranidae and Gobiidae being the largest families; 56.7 % of these species live in shallow coral reefs, 33.7 % inside the fringing reef, 28.0 % in shallow rocky reefs, 16.8 % on sand bottoms, 14.0 % in deep reefs, 11.9 % on the reef flat, and 11.1 % in estuaries. 63 species are first records for Réunion. Zoogeographically, 65 % of the fish fauna have a widespread Indo-Pacific distribution, while only 2.6 % are Mascarene endemics, and 0.7 % Réunion endemics. The classification of the following species is changed in the present paper: Anguilla labiata (Peters, 1852) [pre- viously A. bengalensis labiata]; Microphis millepunctatus (Kaup, 1856) [previously M. brachyurus millepunctatus]; Epinephelus oceanicus (Lacepède, 1802) [previously E. fasciatus (non Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775)]; Ostorhinchus fasciatus (White, 1790) [previously Apogon fasciatus]; Mulloidichthys auriflamma (Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775) [previously Mulloidichthys vanicolensis (non Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1831)]; Stegastes luteobrun- neus (Smith, 1960) [previously S.
    [Show full text]