DOCSLIB.ORG

Rose Atoll National Wildlife Refuge C/O National Park Service Rose Atoll Pago Pago, AS 96799 Phone: 684/633-7082 Ext

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rose Atoll National Wildlife Refuge C/O National Park Service Rose Atoll Pago Pago, AS 96799 Phone: 684/633-7082 Ext U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Comprehensive Conservation and Environmental Plan Assessment Refuge Wildlife National Rose Atoll U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Rose Atoll National Wildlife Refuge c/o National Park Service Rose Atoll Pago Pago, AS 96799 Phone: 684/633-7082 ext. 15 National Wildlife Refuge Fax: 684/699-3986 Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment October 2012 Font Cover Photos Main: An array of seabirds find refuge at Rose Atoll USFWS Inset: Pisonia tree JE Maragos/USFWS Red-tailed tropic bird chick Greg Sanders/USFWS Tridacna maxima JE Maragos/USFWS Pink algae found on the coral throughout the Refuge gives Rose Atoll its name. USFWS October 2012 Refuge Vision Perched on an ancient volcano, reef corals, algae, and clams grow upwards thousands of feet on the foundation built by their ancestors over millions of years. Here, Rose Atoll National Wildlife Refuge glows pink in the azure sea. This diminutive atoll shelters a profusion of tropical life. Encircled by a rose-colored coralline algal reef, the lagoon teems with brilliant fish and fluted giant clams with hues of electric blue, gold, and dark teal. Sea turtles gracefully ply the waters and find safe haven lumbering ashore to lay eggs that perpetuate their ancient species. On land, stately Pisonia trees form a dim green cathedral where sooty tern calls echo as they fly beneath the canopy. Their calls join the cackling of the red-footed boobies, whinnying of the frigate birds, and moaning of the wedge-tailed shearwaters. Inspired by their living history at the atoll, tamaiti perpetuate Fa’a Samoa through an understanding and shared stewardship of their natural world. In the vast deep South Pacific, Rose Atoll survives as a monument from the past and beacon for the future of biological, geological, and cultural diversity for all Samoa. Pale o Galuega o le Faasao mo Meaola O lona taoto mai, o se pala ma¯tu¯ na eaea ma¯lie a’e lona faavae i luga o se maugamu¯, si’omia e ‘amu lona a’au, o ituaiga limu eseese e ola i lona gataifale, ma faisua e ola lauusiusi aga’i i luga e pe a ma le afe ni futu lona maualuga o lo o taoto mai ai lenei nofoaga na foa mai e ona tua’a¯ i le miliona o tausaga ua mavae. I lea la nofoaga, o le Faasao a le Ma¯lo¯ Tele mo Meaola e pei ona mautu nei i le motu ‘amu o Rose e sulugia mai ai le lanu piniki i le sami tioata. O lenei tama’i motu ‘amu ua fai ma nofoaga e tua i ai le tele o meaola o le si’osi’omaga. E si’osi’omia lona a’au e se limu e soa ma le lanu o le rosa, e mau lona aloalo i i’a matagofie ma ‘amu tetele faatasi ai ma meaola ninii e felanulanua’i solo ma o lo o atagia mai ai le lanu moana, lanu auro, ma le lanu uliuli e sosolo faapei o se faititili lona tino mai. E fega¯soloa’i laumei o le gataifale i le foga¯sami ae ma¯lo¯lo¯ mai i lo latou mapusaga i le mata¯faga e tu’ufua ai ma atili olaola ai lo latou tupu’aga na amata asa¯ le vavau se i o’o mai nei ona po. I luga o lea fanua, e fa’alafua¯ le tuputupu a’e o laau e ta’ua o laumatui ua fai ma nofoaga tumau o gogo ma lagona leotele ai le fetalia’i o o latou leo i lalo o le malu o pupu laau. E fea¯lumi nei leo o manu tagi ma le pa¯fuga o le ‘a¯, o le tagi lea o le fua’o¯, faatasi ai ma le tagi mai o le ‘atafa, ma le uio¯ o le toloa. Ona o le taualoa tele o talatuu tau measina o lea motu ‘amu, ua teu fatu ai le naunauta’iga a tupulaga talavou e u’una’i pea le Faasamoa i se faagaoioiga malamalama toe manino ma avea ai i latou o ni tausimea i le taavili soifua o lea si’osi’omaga tu¯pito. I le vasa loaloa o i le Pasefika i Saute, o lo o pa¯pa¯’aveloa le soifua o le motu ‘amu o Rose ua avea ai o se motu iloga toe faailogaina na amata mai lava i lona anamua ma o lea ua avea o se taula’iga e faasinoala i su’esu’ega tau paiolo (biological), su’esu’ega o le eleele (geological), ma le talia lelei o eseesega tau aganuu mo Samoa atoa. Reef life at Rose Atoll JE Maragos/USFWS Rose Atoll , as seen from low Earth orbit Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. USFWS/DMWR Rose Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment Prepared by: Rose Atoll National Wildlife Refuge/Marine National Monument c/o National Park Service Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hawaiian and Pacific Islands Planning Team 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 5-231 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96850 October 2012 Rose Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction and Background ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Significance of the Refuge ........................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................................ 1-5 1.4 Purpose and Need for Action .................................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Legal and Policy Guidance ....................................................................................................... 1-6 1.5.1 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service .................................................................................. 1-6 1.5.2 National Wildlife Refuge System ..................................................................................... 1-6 1.5.3 Presidential Proclamation 8337 ........................................................................................ 1-8 1.5.4 Other Laws and Mandates ................................................................................................ 1-9 1.6 Refuge Establishment and Purposes ......................................................................................... 1-9 1.6.1 Legal Significance of the Refuge Purpose(s) .................................................................... 1-9 1.6.2 Purpose and History of Refuge Establishment ............................................................... 1-10 1.6.3 Land Status and Ownership ............................................................................................ 1-10 1.7 Relationship to Other Planning Efforts ................................................................................... 1-13 1.7.1 Relationship to Refuge Plans .......................................................................................... 1-13 1.7.2 Other Plans and Assessments .......................................................................................... 1-13 1.8 Special Designation Lands ...................................................................................................... 1-14 1.9 Planning Process and Issue Identification ............................................................................... 1-14 1.9.1 Planning Process ............................................................................................................. 1-14 1.9.2 Key Issues Addressed in the CCP ................................................................................... 1-15 1.9.3 Issues outside the Scope of the CCP ............................................................................... 1-15 1.10 Refuge Vision and Goals ...................................................................................................... 1-16 1.10.1 Refuge Vision (Pale o Galuega o le Faasao mo Meaola).............................................. 1-16 1.10.2 Refuge Goals (Manulautī o le Faasao mo Meaola) ....................................................... 1-16 Chapter 2. Management Alternatives ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Alternatives Development ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Actions Considered but not Developed .................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Alternative Descriptions ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3.1 Features Common to All Alternatives .............................................................................. 2-1 2.3.2 Summary of Alternatives .................................................................................................. 2-5 2.4 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................................ 2-13 2.4.1 Goal 1: Protect and maintain the lagoon habitats to meet the life-history needs of native species in this community. ............................................................................................ 2-14 2.4.2 Goal 2: Restore, protect, and maintain the perimeter crustose coralline algal reef to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida
    Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States goverment. Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Florida Integrated Science Center 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, FL 32653 [email protected] James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research 101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, NC 28516 [email protected] Lad Akins Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF) 98300 Overseas Highway Key Largo, FL 33037 [email protected] Suggested Citation: Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins. 2009. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. Lad Akins NOAA, National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. September 2009 United States Department of National Oceanic and National Ocean Service Commerce Atmospheric Administration Gary F. Locke Jane Lubchenco John H. Dunnigan Secretary Administrator Assistant Administrator Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ i Methods .....................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • For Control of the Big-Headed Ant, Pheidole Megacephala (Fabricius)1
    Vol. XIII, No. 1, April 1979 119 Laboratory Tests with Candidate Insecticides for Control of the Big-Headed Ant, Pheidole megacephala (Fabricius)1 F.L. McEwen, J.W. Beardsley, Jr. M. Hapai and T.H. Su DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY, COLLEGE OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, HONOLULU, HAWAII The big-headed ant, Pheidole megacephala (Fabr.) is the dominant ant species in pineapple fields in Hawaii (Phillips, 1934). Its main importance is the role it plays in nursing mealybugs; in particular the gray mealybug, Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley, the principal vector of mealybug wilt to pineapple. According to Carter (1967) the ant is essential to the well-being of the mealybug in that it ''fights off predators and parasites, cleans up the masses of honey dew secreted by the mealybugs and eats dead and dying members of the colony." Carter (1967) pointed out further that the ants move mealybugs from one plant to another and that in the absence of ants, "mealybug infestations either die out or are very small in num bers." Prior to 1945, ant control in pineapple plantations was difficult to achieve, the only methods available being the use of ant fences and long intercycles between plantings. Mealybugs were abundant and pineapple wilt a serious factor in produc tion. When DDT became available it was found that this insecticide provided con trol of the big-headed ant and the practice was adopted of using a broadcast spray of 4 lbs. active per acre as soon as possible after the pineapples were planted followed by three more applications of 2 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 American Samoa Passive Acoustic Monitoring Site ROSE Rose Atoll
    American Samoa Passive Acoustic Monitoring Site ROSE Rose Atoll, American Samoa Ecological Acoustic Recorder (EAR) 14-March-2008 to 16-July-2009 Level 1 Analysis of Passive Acoustic Observations1 Synopsis This document provides a level 1 analysis of the data obtained from ecological acoustic recorder (EAR) unit 9300638B041 deployed at Rose Atoll from March 12th 2008 to March 4th 2010. The EAR unit recorded acoustic data from March 14th 2008 to July 16th 2009. This initial report contains background information about the site, time-series of total acoustic energy, and analyses of event-triggered recordings. Background Monitoring the changing status of coral reef environments and associated biota is a critical management need and a considerable technological challenge, especially on reefs in remote locations. The Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC) Coral Reef Ecosystem Division (CRED), in partnership with the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), is using natural ambient sounds as a way to characterize the activity of marine organisms on coral reefs and in surrounding waters. By deploying a device known as the Ecological Acoustic Recorder (EAR), a cost-effective tool for recording biological and anthropogenic sounds, CRED investigates and monitors the presence and activity of sound-producing marine life and human activity. The EAR can be left in place unattended for up to two years, depending on the instrument’s configuration. Passive acoustic observations are typically not compromised by bio-fouling. The EAR records the local ambient acoustic environment on a programmed schedule and is also triggered to record by high amplitude transient events, such as engine noise from passing vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Big-Headed Ant (361) Relates To: Ants
    Pacific Pests, Pathogens & Weeds - Fact Sheets https://apps.lucidcentral.org/ppp/ Big-headed ant (361) Relates to: Ants Photo 1. Side view of 'major' worker, big-headed ant, Photo 2. Front view, head of 'major' worker, big- Pheidole megacephala. headed ant, Pheidole megacephala. Photo 3. Front view, head of 'minor' worker, big- headed ant, Pheidole megacephala. Common Name Big-headed ant, African big-headed ant, coastal brown ant. Scientific Name Pheidole megacephala Distribution Worldwide. Asia, Africa, North, South, and Central America, the Caribbean, Europe, Oceania. it is recorded from Australia, Cook Islands, Fiji, French Polynesia, Guam, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Niue, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Tonga, Vanuatu, Wallis and Futuna Islands. Hosts Nests of Pheidole megacephala are found under rotten logs, stones, tree bark and within leaf litter. More occasionally, nests occur in wall cavities and ceilings, and the ants forage in kitchens and bathrooms. Symptoms & Life Cycle Pheidole megacephala is one of the world's most invasive ant species. Direct damage occurs when seeds are taken as food, affecting agriculture, and home invasions result in chewed electrical and telephone cables. Indirect damage results from the ants' association with aphids, mealybugs, scale insects and whiteflies. They feed on the honeydew from these pests and protect them from their natural enemies and, consequently, pest populations increase to damaging levels. Furthermore, the honeydew excreted by these insects is colonised by sooty moulds turning leave black and blocking photosynthesis. Big-headed ants prefer disturbed habitats, agricultural and urban areas in tropical and subtropical countries, but they also invade rainforests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Stream Fishes of Hawaii
    Summer 2014 American Currents 2 THE NATIVE STREAM FISHES OF HAWAII Konrad Schmidt St. Paul, MN [email protected] Several years ago at the University of Minnesota a poster The “uniqueness” of these species is due not only to the about Hawaii’s native freshwater fishes caught my eye. I high degree of endemism, but also includes their habitat, life was astonished to learn that for a tropical zone the indige- cycle, and evolutionary adaptations. Hawaii’s watersheds nous freshwater ichthyofauna (traditionally and collectively are typically short and small. The healthiest fish populations known as ‘o’opu) is incredibly rich in uniqueness, but very generally inhabit perennial streams located on the windward poor in species diversity, comprising only four gobies and (northeast) side of islands which are drenched with 100-300 one sleeper. Four of the five are endemic to Hawaii. How- inches of rainfall annually. Frequent and turbid flash floods, ever, recent research suggests the ‘o’opu nākea of Hawaii is called freshets, occur on a regular basis; between events, a distinct species from the Pacific River Goby, and is, there- however, stream visibility can exceed 30 feet. On the lee- fore, also endemic. In addition to these fishes, there are only ward, drier sides, populations do persist in some intermit- two native euryhaline species that venture from the ocean tent streams at higher elevations even though lower reaches into the lower and slower reaches of streams not far above may be dry for months or years. These dynamic streams are their mouths: Hawaiian Flagtail (Kuhlia sandvicensis) and continually and naturally in a state of recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Shyama Pagad Programme Officer, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group
    Final Report for the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development Compile and Review Invasive Alien Species Information Shyama Pagad Programme Officer, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group 1 Table of Contents Glossary and Definitions ................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Alien and Invasive Species in Kiribati .............................................................................................. 7 Key Information Sources ................................................................................................................. 7 Results of information review ......................................................................................................... 8 SECTION 2 ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Pathways of introduction and spread of invasive alien species ................................................... 10 SECTION 3 ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Kiribati and its biodiversity ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • American Samoa
    Coral Reef Habitat Assessment for U.S. Marine Protected Areas: U.S. Territory of American Samoa National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA’s National Ocean Service Management & Budget Office Special Projects February 2009 Project Overview About this Effort NCCOS Benthic Habitat Mapping Effort The United States Coral Reef Task Force (USCRTF), in both its National The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Action Plan to Conserve Coral Reefs (2000) and its National Coral Reef Ocean Service (NOS) initiated a coral reef research program in 1999 to Action Strategy (2002), established a key conservation objective of pro- map, assess, inventory, and monitor U.S. coral reef ecosystems (Monaco tecting at least 20% of U.S. coral reefs and associated habitat types in et al. 2001). These activities were implemented in response to require- no-take marine reserves. NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program has ments outlined in the Mapping Implementation Plan developed by the Map- been supporting efforts to assess current protection levels of coral reefs ping and Information Synthesis Working Group (MISWG) of the Coral Reef within Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and quantify the area of U.S. coral Task Force (CRTF) (MISWG 1999). NOS’s National Centers for Coastal reef ecosystems protected in no-take reserves. The official federal defini- Ocean Science (NCCOS) Biogeography Team was charged with the de- tion of an MPA, signed into law by Executive Order 13158, is “any area of velopment and implementation of a plan to produce comprehensive digital the marine environment that has been reserved by federal, state, tribal, coral-reef ecosystem maps for all U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Islands Area
    Habitat Planting for Pollinators Pacific Islands Area November 2014 The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation www.xerces.org Acknowledgements This document is the result of collaboration with state and federal agencies and educational institutions. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for the technical assistance and time spent suggesting, advising, reviewing, and editing. In particular, we would like to thank the staff at the Hoolehua Plant Materials Center on the Hawaiian Island of Molokai, NRCS staff in Hawaii and American Samoa, and researchers and extension personnel at American Samoa Community College Land Grant (especially Mark Schmaedick). Authors Written by Jolie Goldenetz-Dollar (American Samoa Community College), Brianna Borders, Eric Lee- Mäder, and Mace Vaughan (The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation), and Gregory Koob, Kawika Duvauchelle, and Glenn Sakamoto (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service). Editing and layout Ashley Minnerath (The Xerces Society). Updated November 2014 by Sara Morris, Emily Krafft, and Anne Stine (The Xerces Society). Photographs We thank the photographers who generously allowed use of their images. Copyright of all photographs remains with the photographers. Cover main: Jolie Goldenetz-Dollar, American Samoa Community College. Cover bottom left: John Kaia, Lahaina Photography. Cover bottom right: Gregory Koob, Hawaii Natural Resources Conservation Service. Funding This technical note was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and produced jointly by the NRCS and The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. Additional support was provided by the National Institute for Food and Agriculture (USDA). Please contact Tony Ingersoll ([email protected]) for more information about this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Behavioral Ecology, Life History, Genetics, and Morophology
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Aspects of the behavioral ecology, life history, genetics, and morophology of the Hawaiian kuhliid fishes Lori Keene Benson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Benson, Lori Keene, "Aspects of the behavioral ecology, life history, genetics, and morophology of the Hawaiian kuhliid fishes" (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1890. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1890 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. ASPECTS OF THE BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, LIFE HISTORY, GENETICS, AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE HAWAIIAN KUHLIID FISHES A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Lori Keene Benson B.S., University of Tampa, 1995 December 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to first thank my major professor, Dr. Mike Fitzsimons, for being a wonderful adviser on matters both scientific and unscientific. He was supportive when I left Baton Rouge during my final year of graduate school to pursue a job opportunity. I feel that I couldn’t have successfully juggled all of these responsibilities without him. I am also especially grateful for all of the help I received from my fellow graduate students at LSU.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West
    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
    [Show full text]
  • (Lefèbvre, 1832) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae, Syntomini) 82-84 82 Nachr
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo Jahr/Year: 2016 Band/Volume: 37 Autor(en)/Author(s): De Freina Josef J., de Prins Willy, de Prins Jurate Artikel/Article: On the nomenclature of Amata kuhlweinii (Lefèbvre, 1832) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae, Syntomini) 82-84 82 Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 37 (2/3): 82–84 (2016) On the nomenclature of Amata kuhlweinii (Lefèbvre, 1832) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae, Syntomini) Josef J. de Freina, Willy De Prins and Jurate De Prins Josef J. de Freina, Eduard­Schmid­Strasse 10, D­81541 München, Germany; [email protected] Willy De Prins, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B­1000 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] Jurate De Prins, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B­1000 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] Abstract: The entomological literature contains numerous „Syntomis kuhlweinii“. — Butler (1877: 16; pl. 6, fig. 17). — A in consistent spellings of the syntomine Amata kuhlweinii justified emendation. (Le fèbvre, 1832). Literature studies show that the correct ‡„Syntomis khulweinii, Lefèbv.“. — Distant (1892: 236). — An spel ling should read as previously cited in the headline. The incorrect subsequent spelling. date of pub li ca tion should be quoted correctly as 1832. „Z[ygaena] Kuhlweinii, Lef.“. — Kirby (1892: 94). — A correct subsequent spelling. Anmerkungen zur Nomenklatur von Amata kuhlweinii ‡„Syntomis kuhlweini Lefèbvre, 1831“. — Hampson (1898: (Lefèbvre, 1832) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Arctiinae, 82). — An incorrect subsequent spelling. Syntomini) „Syntomis Kuhlweinii“. — Barrett (1901: 193). — A correct Zusammenfassung: In der Literatur finden sich zahlreiche subsequent spelling.
    [Show full text]