DOCSLIB.ORG

SOIL PRE-TEST REPORT RWANDA RURAL SANITATION – ISUKU IWACU ACTIVITY May 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Photo: Isuku Iwacu SOIL PRE-TEST REPORT RWANDA RURAL SANITATION – ISUKU IWACU ACTIVITY May 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions and contents of this report are the sole responsibility of SNV and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………..4 2. Scope of the work……………………………………………………………………………………….4 3. Soil identification……………………….………………………………………………………………9 4. Soil description in different Districts…………………………….……………………………………….10 .Kicukiro District………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Nyarugenge District………………………………………………………………………………………20 Rwamagana District………………………………………………………………………………………28 Kayonza District…………………………………………………………………………………………..36 Ngoma District…………………………………………………………………………………………….49 Ruhango District…………………………………………………………………………………………..61 Nyanza District……………………………………………………………………………………………72 Nyabihu District…………………………………………………………………………………………..79 1 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES FIGURES - Figure 1:Soil resistance test with penetrometer………………………………………………..4 - Figure 2:Pit excavation in Rwamagana District………………………………………………..5 TABLES - Table 1:Soil classification based on grain size …………………………………………………8 - Table 2: Technical specifications……………………………………………………………….11 - Table 3: Kicukiro soil profile and lithology presentation………………………………………12 - Table 4: Soil characteristics in Kicukiro District……………………………………………….13 - Table 5: Gishikiri village/Kanombe sector soil resistance……………………………………...14 - Table 6: Kabuye village/Gikondo sector soil resistance………………………………………..15 - Table 7: Ruhanga village/Masaka sector soil resistance………………………………………..16 - Table 8: Nyarugenge soil profile and lithology presentation…………………………………...20 - Table 9: Soil characteristics in Nyarugenge District……………………………………………20 - Table 10: Inyambo village/Nyarugenge sector soil resistance…………………………………..21 - Table 11: Kagunga village/Nyamirambo sector soil resistance…………………………………23 - Table 12: Rwamagana soil profile and lithology presentation…………………………………..28 - Table 13: Soil characteristics in Rwamagana District…………………………………………...28 - Table 14: Nyirabiteri village/Fumbwe sector soil resistance…………………………………….29 - Table 15 : Rwamibungo village/Nyakariro sector soil resistance………………………………..32 - Table 16: Kayonza soil profile and lithology presentation………………………………………36 - Table 17: Soil characteristics in Kayonza District……………………………………………….37 - Table 18: Bwiza village/Nyamirama sector soil resistance………………………………………37 - Table 19: Mbarara village/Rwinkwavu sector soil resistance……………………………………39 - Table 20: Nyamata village/Ndego sector soil resistance…………………………………………42 - Table 21: Rugunga village/Murundi sector soil resistance……………………………………….45 - Table 22: Ngoma soil profile and lithology presentation………………………………………...49 - Table 23: Soil characteristics in Ngoma District…………………………………………………50 - Table 24: Kibimba village/Kibungo sector soil resistance……………………………………….50 - Table 25: Nyamabuye village/Mugesera sector soil resistance…………………………………..52 - Table 26: Nyamirindi village/Mutenderi sector soil resistance…………………………………..54 - Table 27: Rugarama village/Gashanda sector soil resistance…………………………………….56 - Table 28: Ruhango soil profile and lithology presentation……………………………………….59 - Table 29: Soil characteristics in Ruhango District………………………………………………..61 - Table 30: Kajevuba village/Mwendo sector soil resistance……………………………………….62 - Table 31: Karama village/Ntongwe sector soil resistance…………………………………………64 - Table 32: Kidoma village/Mbuye sector soil resistance……………………………………………66 - Table 33: Bugarama village/Bweramana sector soil resistance…………………………………….68 - Table 34: Nyanza soil profile and lithology presentation…………………………………………..72 - Table 35: Gahogo village/Busogo sector soil resistance……………………………………………73 - Table 36: Rugarama village/Busasamana sector soil resistance…………………………………….75 - Table 37: Nyabihu soil profile and lithology presentation………………………………………….79 - Table 38: Soil characteristics in Nyabihu District…………………………………………………...79 - Table 39: Kadatemwa village/Kintobo sector soil resistance………………………………………. 80 - Table 40: Muturirwa village/Rambura sector soil resistance…………………………………………82 2 1 INTRODUCTION Under the USAID-funded Isuku Iwacu – Rwanda Rural Sanitation Activity (RRSA) implemented SNV, and including World Vision International and Water for People in the following eight districts: Kayonza, Kicukiro, Ngoma, Nyabihu, Nyanza, Nyarugenge, Ruhango, and Rwamagana, SNV hired Eng. Dominique HITAYEZU, expert in geotechnical, to carry out additional geotechnical studies across the eight districts. The geotechnical investigations have been realized based on technical specifications and terms of reference submitted by the client. The content of this report will be based mainly on in situ soil investigations, laboratory test analysis in terms of defining the site conditions and characteristics of the existing ground in different districts investigated. 2 SCOPE OF THE WORK. Before starting the site investigation, a site visit has been organized for visual inspection of the project. A reconnaissance visit was done in each District for making identification of the site locations in different cells for each District. The second phase of our mission was devoted to conduct Geotechnical Investigations divided into two tranches: - The first tranche consisted of conducting the penetration test using a light dynamic penetrometer in order to determine the allowable stress of soil in each area identified, and to provide the necessary information on the nature and behaviour of the soil or rock layers in place. Figure1: Soil resistance test with Penetrometer. 3 - The second tranche consisted of conducting soil reconnaissance by making pits 2 m deep each followed by soil sampling. All samples collected were conducted in the laboratory for identification. Figure 2: 2m deep Pit excavation in Rwamagana Our geotechnical study has been conducted in terms of making soil investigations on existing natural ground, making deep investigations on all locations where construction of latrines will be made for determining and defining the soil stability of the materials in place; carrying out all problems encountered and finding the sustainable solutions for each problem. All activities realized are presented in the table below: DISTRICT SECTOR/VILLAGE N0 PITS N0 DCP SOIL SAMPLES GIKONDO/KABUYE 1 1 1 KANOMBE/GISHIKIRI 1 1 1 KICUKIRO GAHANGA/RUKORE 1 0 1 MASAKA/RUHANGA 1 1 1 NYAMIRAMBO/KAGUNGA 1 1 1 NYARUGENGE NYARUGENGE/INYAMBO 1 1 1 FUMBWE/NYIRABITERI 1 1 1 RWAMAGANA NYAKARIRO/RWAMIBUNGO 1 1 1 MURINDI/RUGUNGA RWINKWAVU/MBARARA KAYONZA NDEGO/NYAMATA NYAMIRAMA/BWIZA MUTENDERI/NYAMIRINDI KIBUNGO/KABIMBA NGOMA GASHANDA/RUGARAMA MUGESERA/NYAMABUYE RUHANGO MWENDO/KAJEVUBA BWERAMA/RUGARAMA 4 MBUYE/KIDOMA NTONGWE/KARAMA BUSORO/GAHOGO NYANZA BUSASAMANA/RUGARAMA RAMBURA/KAMIRO NYABIHU KINTOBO/KADATERURWA 3. DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TESTS REALIZATION The testing was carried out at the existing ground with a TRL Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) which is an instrument designed for the rapid in situ measurement of the structural properties of existing ground with unbound granular materials . The underlying principle of the DCP is that the rate of penetration of the cone, when driven by a standard force, is inversely related to the strength of the material as measured by, for example, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test. Where the soil layers have different strengths, the boundaries between the layers can be identified and the thickness of the layers determined. During our DCP testing, we followed TRL instructions stipulating that « penetration rates as low as 0.5 mm/blow are acceptable but if there is no measurable penetration after 20 consecutive blows it can be assumed that the DCP will not penetrate the material. Under these circumstances a hole can be drilled through the layer using either an electric or pneumatic drill or by coring. The lower layers of the ground can then be tested in the normal way ». DCP results have been processed in appendix No.1. The test was conducted by means of a standard TRL DCP device having the following features: - Drop weight: 8 kg - Drop height: 575 mm - Cone diameter: 20 mm - Apex angle of cone: 60° DCP testing were conducted at nine (8) points as follow: - Rwamagana District: 2points - Nyanza District: 2 points - Nyabihu District: 2 points - Nyarugenge District: 2points 4. LABORATORY TESTING The trial pit research was followed by sampling and collection of all samples to the laboratory for identification and analysis. The following laboratory tests have been made on each sample - Sieve analysis 5 - Natural moisture content - Atterberg limits 4.1 Geotechnical investigations This section highlights the detailed subsoil investigation of identified areas . This is based on the field and laboratory tests conducted on all trial pits made. Description of subsoil condition, soil characteristics and details of different parameters will be based on the following tests: 4.2. Index properties and soil classification Index properties refer to those properties of a soil that indicate the type and conditions of the soil, and provide parameters for the classification. They are also referred as classification properties and classification or index tests are performed in laboratory for determination of these properties. Basically, two types of tests are performed to identify the type and conditions of the soil. These include: · Particle size
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622

    Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622

    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION P.O.BOX 622 KIGALI Rwanda Report on Variable Tranche linked to two Indicators: 1.Equity Indicator: Pre-Primary Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) increased from an average of 10% in 2014 to 17% by 2017 in the 22 poorest performing districts (defined as those that had GER of less than 17% in 2014). $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 2. Efficiency: Education Statistics 2016, disaggregated at district level, available. $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 October 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: EQUITY INDICATOR: PRE-PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATE (GER) IN 22 POOREST PERFORMING DISTRICTS ............................................................ 3 Table 1. Pre-Primary Enrolment in 2016 and 2017 (All Distrcits) ................................. 3 Table 2. Pre-Primary Gross Enrolement Rate in Rwanda (as per GPE requirement) 5 Table 3. Pre-Primary GER in 2017 in 22 poorest performing districts current status 5 Table 4. Average of GER in Pre-Primary in 8 better performing districts in 2017 ...... 6 Table 5. GER in Pre-Primary Comparison between 2014 and 2017 in 22 Poorest Performing Districts ............................................................................................................ 7 Table 6. Classrooms Rehabilitated
  • Rwanda NCA Land Accounts 2018

    Rwanda NCA Land Accounts 2018

    RWANDA NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTS - LAND March 2018 The Rwanda Natural Capital Accounts for Land, has been compiled, designed and published by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) and the Ministry of Environment with assistance from the World Bank and the WAVES Global Partnership. Additional information about the NCA Land 2016 may be obtained from: NISR: KN, 2 Av, 36, PO. Box 6139, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone: +250 252 571 035 Email: [email protected] Ministry of Environment: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minirena.gov.rw Ministry of Land and Forest: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minilaf.gov.rw Cover image constructed from maps produced by the Regional Centre for Mapping Resources for Development, available from www.rcmrd.org and available on RLMUA Land Use Planning Portal www.rwandalanduse.rnra.rw. Recommended citation: Government of Rwanda (NISR, Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Lands and Forestry), Natural Capital Accounts for Land, March 2018. ii Contents LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................
  • Rwanda Women's Network Location

    Rwanda Women's Network Location

    1 RWANDA WOMEN’S NETWORK1 ASSERTING WOMEN’S LAND RIGHTS Name: Rwanda Women’s Network Location: Eastern Rwanda Year of foundation: 1997 Contact: Annette Mukiga E-Mail: [email protected] 1 Prepared by Justine Mirembe, in collaboration with Peninah Abatoni, Mary Balikungeri, Elisabetta Cangelosi, Annette Mukiga, Sabine Pallas, Viviana Sacco and the group of women and paralegals of the Polyclinic of Hope in Bugesera. 2 The Context Rwanda Women’s Network (RWN) is a national non-governmental organization working in Rwanda since 1997 when it took over from its parent organization-Church World Service. RWN was established with the mission of promoting and improving the socio-economic welfare of women in Rwanda. Its main administrative offices are located in Gasabo district “village of Hope” - Kigali City but RWN has also established 4 spaces/centers (Polyclinics of Hope) for women in the districts of Gatsibo, Nyarugenge and Bugesera. RWN began with a program of promoting women’s rights to land, housing and inheritance specifically targeting victims of rape and other violent crimes largely perpetuated during the 1994 genocide against Tutsi, as well as vulnerable homeless women returnees after the war. The current population of Rwanda stands at more than 11 million people, over 80% of whom depend on agriculture. With a surface area of 26.338 square kilometer for 11 million people, Rwanda’s population density stands at more than 416 inhabitants per square kilometer (Rwanda Demographic profile, 2013), making it a densely populated country. Gender wise, women constitute more than 53% of the adult population and 50% of these are widows.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    SFG1006 REV Rwanda Great Lakes Emergency Sexual and Gender Based Violence and Women’s Health Project Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Approach, including Environmental Management Plan and Medical Waste Management Plan Executive Summary and Conclusions The Environmental and Social Management Approach (ESMA) provides general policies, guidelines, codes of practice and procedures to mainstream environmental and social (E&S) due diligence during the implementation of the World Bank supported Great Lakes Emergency Sexual and Gender Based Violence and Women’s Health Project. The objective of the abbreviated ESMA is to help ensure that activities will be in compliance with the national legislations of Rwanda and the World Bank’s E&S safeguards policies. Public Disclosure Authorized The document is the main due diligence instrument required by the World Bank as financer, and additionally covers and goes beyond the Rwandan national regulatory requirements for project- level environmental assessment and management. The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) will be the main resource for environmental management and monitoring for the Client and set the standards and practices that will guide environmental and social project performance. It will become part of the tender package and environmental management and compliance will constitute a subsection of line items in the bill of quantities (BoQ). The selected bidders will be required to accept E&S conditions and tasks upon contract signature, and the implementation of the ESMP will be an integral part of the construction contracts. The monitoring of E&S performance will, much as other quality criteria, be tied to contractual penalties and damage restoration requirements via appropriate contractual clauses.
  • (Gor) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment

    (Gor) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment

    Government of Rwanda (GoR) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment Ruhango District Final Report Prepared by AECOM International Team of Chinedum Nwoko (Team Leader) Stephen Hitimana Theo Frank Munya 31 July 2017 i Basic Information Currency Rwanda Franc = 100 cents Official Exchange Rate ((US $, June 2015) 765 RwF (Average) Fiscal/Budget Year 1 July – 30 June Weights and Measures Metric System Ruhango District Location Southern Province, Rwanda Government Elected Mayor (Chief Executive) and District Council Political arrangement Administrative decentralization HQs Ruhango Industrial/Commercial Cities None, Rural based district Population 319,885 (2012 census) Area 627 km2 Population Density 510 persons/km2 (2012 census) Official Languages Kinyarwanda, English, & French ii Ruhango District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Government of Rwanda – 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment – Ruhango District – Final Report – 31 July 2017 The quality assurance process followed in the production of this report satisfies all the requirements of the PEFA Secretariat and hence receives the ‘PEFA CHECK’. PEFA Secretariat August 28, 2017 iii Ruhango District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Disclosure of Quality Assurance Mechanism The following quality assurance arrangements have been established in the planning and preparation of the PEFA assessment report for the District of Ruhango, Rwanda, and final report dated July 31, 2017. 1. Review of Concept Note - Draft concept note and/or terms of reference dated November 2014 was submitted for review on November 4, 2014 to the following reviewers: - 1) District of Ruhango - 2) Government of Rwanda - 3) World Bank - 4) Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KFW) - 5) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) - 6) UK Department for International Development (DFID) - 7) EU Delegation - 8) Agence Belge de Développement (BTC) - 9) PEFA Secretariat Final concept note dated February 25, 2015 was forwarded to reviewers.
  • A N N U a L R E P O R T 2 0

    A N N U a L R E P O R T 2 0

    National Union of Disability Organizations in Rwanda (NUDOR) A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 0 1 8 NUDOR-Annual report 2018 NUDOR envisages a society where people with disabilities enjoy equal human rights, opportunities and full participation as other citizens. Together we stand Page 1 of 32 NUDOR-Annual report 2018 Welcome from our Chairperson Together we stand. We are not about the cease our work until disability rights are upheld” Since NUDOR was created 9 years ago, a significant advocacy work for inclusion of persons with disability has conducted national wide as well as at local level. However, a lot of challenges are still surfacing. NUDOR and its member have re- newed the commitment towards a Rwandan society People with Disabil- ities enjoy equal human rights, opportunities and full participation as oth- er citizen. In this annual report you will read about how NUDOR advocated for the rights of PWDs in 2018, the key achievements, challenges and way for- ward for the years to come Dominique Bizimana, Chairperson of NUDOR Our interventions for 2018 were guided by our strategic objectives: Rep- resentation and accountability, Capacity building and resource mobilization and Advocacy and influ- encing in 3 priority areas: education, health and poverty reduction. These aims focus on establishing internal systems to ensure the priorities of member organizations are better reflected in NUDOR programmes; help NUDOR and its members to become stronger so that they can bring about change for persons with disabilities; and focus NUDOR’s advocacy efforts on the most pressing is- sues faced by persons with disabilities.
  • Government of Rwanda (Gor) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM

    Government of Rwanda (Gor) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM

    Government of Rwanda (GoR) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment Kicukiro District Final Report Prepared by AECOM International Team of Chinedum Nwoko (Team Leader) Jorge Shepherd Stephen Hitimana Theo Frank Munya 31 July 2017 i Basic Information Currency Rwanda Franc = 100 cents Official Exchange Rate ((US $, June 2015) 765 RwF (Average) Fiscal/Budget Year 1 July – 30 June Weights and Measures Metric System Kicukiro District Location City of Kigali, Rwanda Government Elected Mayor (Chief Executive) and District Council Political arrangement Administrative decentralization HQs Kicukiro Industrial/Commercial Cities Kicukuro / Urban district Population 318,564 (2012 census) Area 167 km2 Population Density 1,911 persons/km2 (2012 census) Official Languages Kinyarwanda, English, & French ii Kicukiro District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Government of Rwanda – 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment – Kicukiro District – Final Report – 31 July 2017 The quality assurance process followed in the production of this report satisfies all the requirements of the PEFA Secretariat and hence receives the ‘PEFA CHECK’. PEFA Secretariat August 28, 2017 iii Kicukiro District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Disclosure of Quality Assurance Mechanism The following quality assurance arrangements have been established in the planning and preparation of the PEFA assessment report for the District of Kicukiro, Rwanda, and final report dated July 31, 2017. 1. Review of Concept Note - Draft concept note and/or terms of reference dated November 2014 was submitted for review on November 4, 2014 to the following reviewers: - 1) District of Kicukiro - 2) Government of Rwanda - 3) World Bank - 4) Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KFW) - 5) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) - 6) UK Department for International Development (DFID) - 7) EU Delegation - 8) Agence Belge de Développement (BTC) - 9) PEFA Secretariat Final concept note dated February 25, 2015 was forwarded to reviewers.
  • Nowhere to Go : Informal Settlement Eradication in Kigali, Rwanda

    Nowhere to Go : Informal Settlement Eradication in Kigali, Rwanda

    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses College of Arts & Sciences 5-2017 Nowhere to go : informal settlement eradication in Kigali, Rwanda. Emily E Benken University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Benken, Emily E, "Nowhere to go : informal settlement eradication in Kigali, Rwanda." (2017). College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses. Paper 127. http://doi.org/10.18297/honors/127 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOWHERE TO GO: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT ERADICATION IN KIGALI, RWANDA By Emily Elizabeth Benken Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Graduation summa cum laude and for Graduation with Honors from the Department of Anthropology University of Louisville May 2017 i ii NOWHERE TO GO: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT ERADICATION IN KIGALI, RWANDA By Emily Elizabeth Benken A Thesis Approved on March 27th, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Thesis Advisor Thesis Committee Member Thesis Committee Member iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my grandmother Mrs. Joyce Graeter Whose unending support made this thesis possible.
  • RWANDA Poverty Assessment

    RWANDA Poverty Assessment

    RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 2015 1 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment 2 RWANDA Poverty Assessment Poverty Global Practice Africa Region April 2015 3 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................10.... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... VIII11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................12 IX 1. A Snapshot of Poverty in Rwanda ..........................................................................................................................12ix Rwanda‘s Poverty Profile: The Expected… ............................................................................................................13 x And the Rather Unexpected … .............................................................................................................................15 xii Inequality is high, driven by location, education, and occupation .......................................................................16 xiii Strong performance in health and basic education ................................................................................................17
  • Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio

    Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio

    Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program was established in 1986 and resumed U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: in 2005 after a pause. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 24 Country Program Coordinator: Geoffrey Kayigi Africa Development Consultants projects and one Cooperative Agreement in Rwanda. PO Box 7210, CCOAIB Building, 3rd Floor Program Director: Rebecca Ruzibuka Total active commitment is $4.33 million. Agricultural investments Remera 1, Plot 2280, Umuganda Bld, Kigali Tel: +250.78.841.5194 total $3.66 million, off-grid energy investments total $348,778, and Tel: +250.78.830.3934 Email: [email protected] youth-led enterprise investments total $25,000. Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on smallholder farmer organizations across the country. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Coopérative des Agriculteurs de 2013-2017 $186,800 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize) Maïs de Nyanza Town/City: Nyanza District, Southern Province (COAMANYA) Summary: The project funds will be used to construct a new factory and purchase approved equipment 2904-RWA and to expand marshland cultivation to another 130 hectares which will directly contribute to an increase of income for over 2,000 persons and promote food security in the area. Funds are also being used to roll out a pilot version of an innovative plot-mapping information system. Coopérative pour le 2015-2017 $78,700 Sector: Processing (Honey) Développement des Apiculteurs et Town/City: Nyamagabe District, Southern Province la Protection de l'Environnement Summary: The project funds will be used to supply beehives, harvesting equipment and to develop an (CODAPE) administrative and financial procedures manual and business plan, as well as to cover key staff 4113-RWA members’ salaries and basic administrative costs to enhance the cooperative’s capacity and boost its honey production and sales revenues.
  • Bugesera District Burera District Gakenke District Gasabo District

    Bugesera District Burera District Gakenke District Gasabo District

    Progress, but more effort Target achieved / on track Not on track N/A No data required Increase from last period Decrease from last period Proportion of Measles & Percentage of Proportion of Percentage of women Percentage of Rubella 2nd Delivery in Percentage of Newborn who new-born not Neonatal teenage receiving ANC 1 during ANC 4th mothers who dose (MR2) facility mother who received PNC 4 breathing service case delivery (19 postpartum 1st trimester standard visit Penta 3 received coverage, all coverage (w/ received PNC 4 Visit at 6 weeks successfully fatality years and Family coverage coverage BCG coverage coverage Iron+folic acid ages (BCG census-based Visit at 6 weeks after birth_new resuscitated rate_new under) planning (based on CBR) (based on CBR) (census-based) (census-based) during ANC denominator) target) 51.7 52.7 50.3 7.9 7.2 41.4 52 42.3 117 118.4 91.5 112.8 108 Bugesera District 76 75.3 84.3 5.3 8.3 71.6 51.7 40.5 84.8 87.4 96.7 121.2 69 Burera District 59.2 59.5 60.3 6.7 10.4 39.6 55.4 37.8 78.7 81.9 99.9 116.8 83 Gakenke District 24.4 24.5 70.7 4.4 3.3 28.3 52.8 35.7 123.2 117 59.6 87.7 124 Gasabo District 78.6 78 73.4 9.1 9.1 55 41.1 38 86.5 98.5 89.7 107.6 84 Gatsibo District 63.1 64.1 82 17.1 6.8 85.4 48.2 39.3 87.4 90.7 99 110.4 91 Gicumbi District 78.4 78.3 85.4 10.5 5.5 46.3 70.2 53.1 100.3 108.7 100 114.4 94 Gisagara District 61.6 63.2 68.2 15 4.4 64.5 50.8 36.1 91.5 89.8 100 101.1 95 Huye District 56 57.2 82.2 14.6 6.9 73.2 34.6 26.4 74.2 79.9 75.7 122.5 59 Kamonyi District 52.9 53 74.4 2.7 5.6 61.2 33.1 24
  • TWUBAKANE Decentralization and Health Program Rwanda

    TWUBAKANE Decentralization and Health Program Rwanda

    TWUBAKANE Decentralization and Health Program Rwanda QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT #18 APRIL— JUNE 2009 USAID/Rwanda Cooperative Agreement # 623-A-00-05-00020-00 Distribution: USAID/Rwanda Twubakane Team Partners Government of Rwanda Ministry of Local Administration Ministry of Health National AIDS Control Commission Twubakane Steering Committee Members Twubakane Partner Districts NGOs, Bilateral and Multi-lateral Partner Agencies Twubakane Quarterly Report #18, April-June, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 TWUBAKANE PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS APRIL-JUNE, 2009 ............................................................ 2 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 2. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PROGRESS .......................................................................... 3 2.1 TWUBAKANE PROGRAM FIELD OFFICES ............................................................................ 4 3. PERFORMANCE REVIEW BY PROGRAM COMPONENT ........................................................ 4 3.1 FAMILY PLANNING/REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS AND QUALITY .............................. 4 3.2 CHILD SURVIVAL, MALARIA AND NUTRITION ACCESS AND QUALITY .............................. 7 3.3 DECENTRALIZATION PLANNING, POLICY AND MANAGEMENT ....................................... 10 3.4 DISTRICT-LEVEL CAPACITY BUILDING ..........................................................................