DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Prosperity Initiative (Epi) Value Chain Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT REPORT Friday, April 1, 2011 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Deloitte Consulting LLP. VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT REPORT USAID ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) CONTRACT NUMBER: AID-114-C-10-00004 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP USAID/CAUCASUS FRIDAY, APRIL 1, 2011 DISCLAIMER: The author‘s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. DATA Author Organization Martin Webber J.E. Austin Associates, Inc. David Feige J.E. Austin Associates, Inc. Carlton Jones J.E. Austin Associates, Inc. Alan Saffery EPI Dennis Zeedyk EPI Lakshmi Lyer CNFA Numerous authors of individual value chain assessments contributed to the report. Their details follow in this table. Value Chain Author(s) Organization Agricultural Value Chains Blueberries and Davit Grigolia EPI Hazelnuts Fresh Fruit and Mamuka EPI Processed Fruit Gachechiladze Juices Fresh Avtandil EPI Vegetables, Korakhashvili Processed Vegetables, and Root Crops Wine Gia Bibileishvili EPI ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) i Non-Agricultural Value Chains Apparel Zviad Kvlividze EPI Carlton Jones J.E. Austin Associates, Inc. Basalt Fiber Temur EPI Products Bolotashvili Carlton Jones J.E. Austin Associates, Inc. Perlite, Wood, Temur EPI and Clay Bolotashvili Products Paper/paperboard Dr. Ken Marsh J.E. Austin /corrugated and Associates, Inc. Plastic crates/beverage EPI bottles David Charkviani Adventure Ursula Jessee J.E. Austin Tourism and Associates, Inc. Wine Tourism EPI Irakli Toloraia MICE Tourism Sergo EPI Baramidze Deloitte Transport and Kent Ford Consulting LLP Logistics Yvan M. Caceres John H. Arnold EPI ICT David Bolkvadze ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) ii ABSTRACT Georgia benefits from strategic location, beautiful physical features and historical treasures, and talented, energetic people. In recent years, a democratically elected, forward-looking government has created an empowering, laissez-faire business environment, complementing these natural endowments with an atmosphere in which business can flourish. Recognizing that this combination of assets and opportunity is rare in the world, the U.S. Government wishes to strengthen, deepen, and institutionalize these developments to ensure continued peace, stability, and democratic political and economic growth. The Economic Prosperity Initiative (EPI) project has conducted 18 assessments for value chains in agriculture and non-agriculture sectors in Georgia. In addition, two deep sector assessments are underway, for ICT and Transport & Logistics. Through these assessments, the EPI team has identified 17 priority value chains as target partners for project implementation. EPI‘s work with the ICT and Transport & Logistics sectors, which are elements of many value chains, will contribute to the competitiveness of the entire economy. ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) iii CONTENTS ABSTRACT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY METHODOLOGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENTS ANNEX 1: BLUEBERRY VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 2: HAZELNUTS VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 3: FRESH FRUIT VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 4: FRUIT JUICE VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 5: FRESH VEGETABLE VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 6: PROCESSED VEGETABLES VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 7: ROOT VEGETABLES VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 8: WINE VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT NON-AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENTS ANNEX 9: APPAREL VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 10: BASALT VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 11: CLAY PRODUCTS VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 12: PERLITE VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 13: WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 14: PAPER/PAPERBOARD/ CORRUGATED PACKAGING VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 15: PLASTIC CRATES/BEVERAGE BOTTLES VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 16: ADVENTURE TOURISM VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 17: MICE TOURISM VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 18: WINE TOURISM VALUE CHAIN ASSESSMENT ANNEX 19: ICT SECTOR ASSESSMENT ANNEX 20: TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS SECTOR ANALYSIS ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY USAID designed and procured the Economic Prosperity Initiative (EPI) – a four-year USD 40.4 million program – to build upon Georgia‘s substantial progress in creating a business environment that provides opportunity for competitive investment and economic growth. EPI‘s broad goal is as follows: “EPI will improve enterprise, industry, and country-level competitiveness by identifying and targeting key external and internal factors to enhance the growth rates and productivity of enterprises in the economy, thereby enhancing the economic well-being of workers in the economy.” EPI contract sections ―Component 2 – Improve the Competitiveness of Targeted Agriculture Sectors‖ and ―Component 3 – Improve the Competitiveness of Targeted Non-Agriculture Sectors‖ require the evaluation of agriculture and non-agriculture sectors, and specify that that value chains must be selected from the priority sectors. Soon after EPI was mobilized, teams of value chain analysts began the process of prioritizing economic sectors based on their competitiveness potential and their ability to meet EPI productivity, employment, investment, access to finance, and exports targets. The Sector Assessment Report identified 10 priority sectors, and within these sectors, 23 priority value chains for further assessment. This Value Chain Assessment Report presents the results of EPI‘s further investigations into 18 value chains and 2 sectors and identifies the value chains with which EPI recommends engagement to support Georgia‘s competitiveness growth. The Report is the EPI deliverable for ―Work Plan Level 22120 Priority Agricultural Value Chain Selection‖, ―Agricultural Sector Selection Report #1‖, ―Work Plan Level 32120 Non-Agricultural Value Chain Selection‖, and ―Non-Agricultural Value Chain Selection Report #1‖. EPI carried out the Value Chain Assessment activities during January-February 2011. Many of the priority value chains identified during the Sector Assessment phase were ultimately selected for recommendation. The Value Chain Assessments enabled EPI to validate several value chains that should be recommended for EPI‘s implementation partnerships, most of which were the same as those identified through initial strategic hypotheses. The Value Chain Assessment process met two important objectives: Enabled EPI to identify value chains for initial implementation partnerships Enabled EPI to develop strong dialogue and linkages with key value chain actors, allowing the program to identify with whom it should engage to develop the value chains‘ action plans. As a result of the assessments, EPI is already working with many of the actors who will be key to the action plan development process. Additional benefits of the Value Chain Assessment process: Through investigations and discussions with value chain actors, several ideas for quick win activities were identified, some of which are already underway. An understanding of the potential competitiveness strategies and entry points for each value chain was developed. ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) v Several short-term Georgian and international subject experts were mobilized during the Assessment. Their participation has in effect ―jump-started‖ the strategizing (and supporting analytics) process, enabling EPI to progress beyond value chain selection. Information and data for the value chain assessments was obtained from: Available reports Print and online data sources Government statistical sources Meetings with value chain actors (more than 275 meetings) Expertise of Georgian and international experts Numerous field visits in Georgia The assessment of each value chain is presented in the annexes formatted in such a way so as to allow users to extract any particular value chain of interest. Each value chain is assessed in terms of its (1) competitiveness potential; (2) impact on the economy and beneficiaries; (3) quality of leadership (within the value chain); and (4) synergies with other value chains, cross-cutting themes, and other aspects of importance to EPI‘s objectives. EPI proposes to immediately move forward to work with the following value chains & sectors: Non-Agricultural Value Chains/Sectors Agricultural Value Chains Apparel Blueberries Construction Materials: Hazelnuts Basalt Fiber products Fruit: Perlite products Wood products Fresh fruit Fruit juice Packaging Vegetables: Paper/paperboard/corrugated Plastic crates/beverage bottles Fresh vegetables Processed vegetables Tourism: Root vegetables Adventure Wine MICE1 Wine Transport and Logistics Sector Details to be determined ICT Sector 1 Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, Exhibitions ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) vi Details to be determined The selected value chains include many synergies. For example: Construction firms will be major actors in the growth of the construction materials value chains and many will be involved in initiatives for each of the three selected construction materials value chains. Some initiatives will be undertaken collaboratively.2 The packaging value chains are important for growth of the agricultural value chains, among others. Elements of all three tourism value chains are intertwined; initiatives in one will support the growth of the others. The wine and wine tourism value chains are inextricably linked. The fresh fruits and processed
Recommended publications
  • Georgian Country and Culture Guide

    Georgian Country and Culture Guide

    Georgian Country and Culture Guide მშვიდობის კორპუსი საქართველოში Peace Corps Georgia 2017 Forward What you have in your hands right now is the collaborate effort of numerous Peace Corps Volunteers and staff, who researched, wrote and edited the entire book. The process began in the fall of 2011, when the Language and Cross-Culture component of Peace Corps Georgia launched a Georgian Country and Culture Guide project and PCVs from different regions volunteered to do research and gather information on their specific areas. After the initial information was gathered, the arduous process of merging the researched information began. Extensive editing followed and this is the end result. The book is accompanied by a CD with Georgian music and dance audio and video files. We hope that this book is both informative and useful for you during your service. Sincerely, The Culture Book Team Initial Researchers/Writers Culture Sara Bushman (Director Programming and Training, PC Staff, 2010-11) History Jack Brands (G11), Samantha Oliver (G10) Adjara Jen Geerlings (G10), Emily New (G10) Guria Michelle Anderl (G11), Goodloe Harman (G11), Conor Hartnett (G11), Kaitlin Schaefer (G10) Imereti Caitlin Lowery (G11) Kakheti Jack Brands (G11), Jana Price (G11), Danielle Roe (G10) Kvemo Kartli Anastasia Skoybedo (G11), Chase Johnson (G11) Samstkhe-Javakheti Sam Harris (G10) Tbilisi Keti Chikovani (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator, PC Staff) Workplace Culture Kimberly Tramel (G11), Shannon Knudsen (G11), Tami Timmer (G11), Connie Ross (G11) Compilers/Final Editors Jack Brands (G11) Caitlin Lowery (G11) Conor Hartnett (G11) Emily New (G10) Keti Chikovani (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator, PC Staff) Compilers of Audio and Video Files Keti Chikovani (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator, PC Staff) Irakli Elizbarashvili (IT Specialist, PC Staff) Revised and updated by Tea Sakvarelidze (Language and Cross-Culture Coordinator) and Kakha Gordadze (Training Manager).
  • Biological and Technological Characteristics of Georgian Wine and Table Grapes

    Biological and Technological Characteristics of Georgian Wine and Table Grapes

    BIO Web of Conferences 5, 01012 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20150501012 © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 Biological and technological characteristics of Georgian wine and table grapes Levan Ujmajuridze and Londa Mamasakhlisashvili LEPL Scientific-Research Center of Agriculture, 6 Marshal Gelovani Ave., 0159 Tbilisi, and Georgia Abstract. Georgian grapevine germplasm, which has formed for thousands of years, includes white, black, red, pink and grey 525 Vitis vinifera cultivars. In 2009–2014 up to 440 local grapevine varieties Vitis vinifera sativa has been restored. These varieties are cultivated in the LEPL Agriculture Scientific-Research Center grapevine collection GEO 038, Mtskheta Munisipal, village Jighaura, at an altitude 550 m. There are retrieved and recorded in the collection up to 60 forms of Vitis vinifera silvestris. In order to study biological and technological characteristics of Georgian grapevine, in 2012–2014 were investigated 50 Georgian widely cultivated white and colored wine and table grapes varieties, in the seven viticulture regions of Georgia. Description of grapevine varieties implemented through the descriptors for grapevine (IPGRI OIV). Botanical, biological- technological, qualitative and quantitative marks are characterized and evaluated. Investigation conducted during the biologic development phases were studied for chemical and eno-carpological characteristics. History of grapevine culture is strongly connected with Phonological development of phases studied and their the history of Georgian nation. Creation and formation technological properties were studied based on grapes juice of local rich assortment was due to the longest cultivation chemical indicators and eno-carpological characteristics. period that made Georgia one of the leading country. The studied varieties were distinguished for middle and Mobilization and conservation of genetic resources high fertility of basal buds.
  • Strategy for Tourism Development in Protected Areas in Georgia

    Strategy for Tourism Development in Protected Areas in Georgia

    STRATEGY FOR TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA Transboundary Joint Secretariat for the Southern Caucasus ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO-TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA Contract number: 2008.65.550 / 2013.11.001 Version: Final 26.03.2015 Issue/Version No.: Final Contract No.: 2008.65.550 / 2013.11.001 Date: 26.03.2015 Authors: Janez Sirse/Lela Kharstishvili Contact Information: Paula Ruiz Rodrigo Österreichische Bundesforste AG Consulting Pummergasse 10-12 3002 Purkersdorf Austria T: +43 2231 600 5570 F: +43 2231 600 5509 [email protected] www.oebfconsulting.at Financed by: Transboundary Joint Secretariat/APA ASSESSING AND DEVELO PING THE ECO - TOURISM POTENTIAL OF T H E PROTECTED AREA S IN GEORGIA TOURISM STRATEGY - FINAL CONTENT ANNEXES ....................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. v ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... vi 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 8 2 METHODLOGY .................................................................................................. 10 3 PROTECTED AREAS AND PROFILE OF SELECTED
  • Diversification and Development in the Kakheti Food and Agriculture Sector

    Diversification and Development in the Kakheti Food and Agriculture Sector

    DIVERSIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE KAKHETI FOOD AND AGRICULTURE SECTOR Background and Recommendations Preparation Team: Editor/Author David Land Authors of Background Papers Lasha Dolidze, Team Leader Ana Godabrelidze, Grapes and Wine Konstantin Kobakhidze, Food Processing and Distribution Beka Tagauri, Primary Production, Processing, and Distribution Data Research Assistant Irene Mekerishvili UNDP Sophie Kemkhadze, Assistant Resident Representative George Nanobashvili, Economic Development Team Leader Vakhtang Piranishvili, Kakheti Regional Development Project Manager The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of UNDP. This document is prepared and published with UNDP technical and financial support. Preparation of the document made possible with the financial contribution of the Romanian Government CONTENTS Table of Contents MESSAGE FROM UNDP RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVE ....................................................... 4 MESSAGE FROM MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE OF GEORGIA .......................................... 5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 10 CHAPTER 2. A REVIEW OF PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ........................... 12 CHAPTER 3. GRAPES AND WINE PRODUCTION ................................................................. 60 CHAPTER 4. AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING: STATUS AND OUTLOOK FOR GEORGIA .................................................................................................
  • No. 10: the EU Investigation Report on the August 2008 War and The

    No. 10: the EU Investigation Report on the August 2008 War and The

    No. 10 2 November 2009 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.jeffersoninst.org www.laender-analysen.de www.res.ethz.ch www.boell.ge The eU Investigation Report on The AugUsT 2008 WaR and The Reactions fRom geoRgIa and RUssIa ■ FROM THE EDITORS The Report of the International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia 2 ■ The Longer “Countdown to War”: Growing Confrontation between Georgia and Russia 2004–2008 2 By Uwe Halbach, Berlin ■ Initial Military Operations during the War in Georgia in August 2008 5 By Wolfgang Richter, Berlin ■ Georgia on the EU Mind 10 By Antonio Missiroli, Brussels ■ The Aggression by the Russian Federation against Georgia 12 By Temuri Yakobashvili, Tbilisi ■ The South Caucasus in the International Spotlight 16 By Fyodor Lukyanov, Moscow ■ OPINION POLL Cui Bono? Opinions of the Population of the South Caucasus States on the August War 20 ■ CHRONICLE From 15 September to 27 October 2009 22 Jefferson Research Centre for East Center for Security HEinRich Böll STifTung DGO European Studies, Bremen Institute Studies, ETH Zurich SouTH CauCaSuS caucasus analytical caucasus analytical digest 10/09 digest from the editors The Report of the International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia On 30 September 2009, the Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Geor- gia was presented to the parties to the conflict, the Council of the EU, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), and the United Nations. The report can be viewed in full-text athttp://www.ceiig.ch/Report.htm l.
  • GEORGIA Second Edition March 2010

    GEORGIA Second Edition March 2010

    WHO DOES WHAT WHERE IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN GEORGIA Second edition March 2010 Georgian National Committee of Disaster Risk Reduction & Environment Sustainable Development FOREWORD Georgia is a highly disaster-prone country, which frequently experiences natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, floods, landslides, mudflows, avalanches, and drought) as well as man-made emergencies (e.g. industrial accidents and traffic accidents). Compounding factors such as demographic change, unplanned urbanization, poorly maintained infrastructure, lax enforcement of safety standards, socio-economic inequities, epidemics, environmental degradation and climate variability amplify the frequency and intensity of disasters and call for a proactive and multi-hazard approach. Disaster risk reduction is a cross-cutting and complex development issue. It requires political and legal commitment, public understanding, scientific knowledge, careful development planning, responsible enforcement of policies and legislation, people-centred early warning systems, and effective disaster preparedness and response mechanisms. Close collaboration of policy-makers, scientists, urban planners, engineers, architects, development workers and civil society representatives is a precondition for adopting a comprehensive approach and inventing adequate solutions. Multi-stakeholder and inter-agency platforms can help provide and mobilize knowledge, skills and resources required for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development policies, for coordination of planning and programmes,
  • Challenges and Opportunities for Selling Wines in Premium New York City Restaurants Made from Niche Grape Varieties. Xinomavro Is Used As an Example

    Challenges and Opportunities for Selling Wines in Premium New York City Restaurants Made from Niche Grape Varieties. Xinomavro Is Used As an Example

    Challenges and opportunities for selling wines in premium New York City restaurants made from niche grape varieties. Xinomavro is used as an example. Candidate: 20410 June 2018 Word Count: 9935 © The Institute of Masters of Wine 2018. No part of this publication may be reproduced without permission. This publication was produced for private purpose and its accuracy and completeness is not guaranteed by the Institute. It is not intended to be relied on by third parties and the Institute accepts no liability in relation to its use. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY……………………………………………………………...……….1 2.0 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………. .3 3.0 LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH CONTEXT……………………. 5 3.1 World grape varieties…………………………………………………...5 3.2 The rise of lesser-known grape varieties and the debate over grape diversity………………………………………………………………….. 6 3.3 Autochthonous: obscure versus niche……………………………….. 7 3.4 Greece and Greek grape varieties…………………………………….8 3.4.1 The importance of export markets for Greece……………8 3.4.2 Diversity and emphasis in autochthonous grape varieties……………………………………………………….9 3.5 The US market…………………………………………………………10 3.5.1 The New York on-premise market………………….…….11 3.6 Preliminary research and case study selection……………………. 13 3.6.1 Red wines………………………………………………….. 13 3.6.2 Case study: Xinomavro………………………… …………14 4.0 METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………………...17 4.1 Overview………………………………………………………………..17 4.2 Definition of key terms………………………………………………...17 4.2.1 Niche reds……………………………………………… …..17 4.2.2 Premium restaurants…………………………………
  • Вина По Бокалам Wines by the Glass

    Вина По Бокалам Wines by the Glass

    ВИНА ПО БОКАЛАМ WINES BY THE GLASS БЕЛЫЕ ВИНА / WHITE WINES 125 ml 2017 Pinot Grigio “Vallade” — Casa Girelli ............................... 390 Сорт винограда: Pinot Grigio Alto Adige, Italy 2018 Viognier — Gai Kodzor ............................................... 400 Сорт винограда: Viognier Krasnodar Region, Russia 2018 Vinho Verde “Сabra Сega” — Casa de Villa Verde .................. 400 Сорт винограда: Loureiro, Arinto, Trajadura, Avesso Minho, Portugal 2018 Vina Esmeralda — Torres (semi-dry) ................................ 440 Сорт винограда: Muscat, Gewurztraminer Penedes, Spain 2018 Sauvignon Blanc “The Nest” — Lake Chalice ...................... 490 Сорт винограда: Sauvignon Blanc Marlborough, New Zealand 2018 Petit Chablis — Guillaume Vrignaud ................................ 750 Сорт винограда: Chardonnay Bourgogne, France 2016 Riesling Classic — Hugel ............................................ 1 000 Сорт винограда: Riesling Alsace, France 2017 Gavi di Gavi “Rovereto” — Michele Chiarlo ......................... 1 200 Сорт винограда: Cortese Piemonte, Italy ® 2017 Sаncerre “Tradition” — Daniel Crochet ............................. 1 500 Сорт винограда: Sauvignon Blanc Val de Loire, France 2017 Bucaneve — Cantina Giubiasco ..................................... 1 700 Сорт винограда: Merlot Ticino, Switzerland 2017 Chablis 1-er Сru “Montmains” — Jean-Marc Brocard .............. 1 750 Сорт винограда: Chardonnay Bourgogne, France ® 2017 Sauvignon “Lafoa” — Colterenzio ................................... 1 900 Сорт винограда:
  • Appellations of Origin of Georgian Wine

    Appellations of Origin of Georgian Wine

    NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CENTER OF GEORGIA SAKPATENTI Appellations of Origin of Georgian Wine OFFICIAL BULLETIN OF THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY SPECIAL EDITION NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CENTER OF GEORGIA SAKPATENTI Appellations of Origin of Georgian Wine TBILISI 2010 GEORGIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABKHAZETI SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI SAMEGRELO BLAC K S E A IMERETI KARTLI GURIA KAKHETI Tbilisi SAMTSKHE- A DJ A R A -JAVAKHETI TURKEY AZERBAIJAN A R ME N I A PREFACE In Georgia, a country with rich culture of wine-growing and wine-making, the tradition of using the geographical name of the place of origin as the appellation of a wine has a long history. Although the territory of Georgia is not large, the number of these appellations is nevertheless significant. Each of them is distinguished by special characteristics, high quality and reputation, which is influenced by the unique environmental conditions of Georgia. After the entry into force of the legal framework governing the protection of appellations of origin of wines, 18 appellations of origin of Georgian wines have been registered at National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia “Sakpatenti”. The Law of Georgia “On Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications of Goods” defines the concept of appellation of origin and geographical indication and stipulates: 1. An appellation of origin is a modern or historical name of a geographical place, region or, in exceptional cases, a name of a country (hereinafter “geographical area”), used to designate the goods: (a) originating within the given geographical area; (b) the specific quality and features of which are essentially or exclusively due to a particular geographical environment and human factors; (c) production, processing and preparation of which take place within the geographical area.
  • Causes of War Prospects for Peace

    Causes of War Prospects for Peace

    Georgian Orthodox Church Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung CAUSES OF WAR PROS P E C TS FOR PEA C E Tbilisi, 2009 1 On December 2-3, 2008 the Holy Synod of the Georgian Orthodox Church and the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung held a scientific conference on the theme: Causes of War - Prospects for Peace. The main purpose of the conference was to show the essence of the existing conflicts in Georgia and to prepare objective scientific and information basis. This book is a collection of conference reports and discussion materials that on the request of the editorial board has been presented in article format. Publishers: Metropolitan Ananya Japaridze Katia Christina Plate Bidzina Lebanidze Nato Asatiani Editorial board: Archimandrite Adam (Akhaladze), Tamaz Beradze, Rozeta Gujejiani, Roland Topchishvili, Mariam Lordkipanidze, Lela Margiani, Tariel Putkaradze, Bezhan Khorava Reviewers: Zurab Tvalchrelidze Revaz Sherozia Giorgi Cheishvili Otar Janelidze Editorial board wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Irina Bibileishvili, Merab Gvazava, Nia Gogokhia, Ekaterine Dadiani, Zviad Kvilitaia, Giorgi Cheishvili, Kakhaber Tsulaia. ISBN 2345632456 Printed by CGS ltd 2 Preface by His Holiness and Beatitude Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia ILIA II; Opening Words to the Conference 5 Preface by Katja Christina Plate, Head of the Regional Office for Political Dialogue in the South Caucasus of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; Opening Words to the Conference 8 Abkhazia: Historical-Political and Ethnic Processes Tamaz Beradze, Konstantine Topuria, Bezhan Khorava - A
  • Political Ties Between the Two Countries Have Resulted in Several Major Waves of Immigration of Georgians to Russia Over the Past Several Centuries

    Political Ties Between the Two Countries Have Resulted in Several Major Waves of Immigration of Georgians to Russia Over the Past Several Centuries

    Reciprocity or the Higher Ground? The Treatment of Ethnic Russians in Georgia After the „Spy Scandal‟ of 2006 David Szakonyi ECMI Issue Brief #16 February 2008 2 The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI‟s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of interethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethnopolitical tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Briefs are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Brief #16 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller © ECMI 2008 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg phone: +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de 3 Reciprocity or the Higher Ground? The Treatment of Ethnic Russians in Georgia After the „Spy Scandal‟ of 2006 David Szakonyi Introduction Since the fall of the Soviet Union, relations between Georgia and Russia have been far from amicable, as disagreements over international alignments, territorial pretensions, and historical legacies have created a significant number of damaging rifts between the political elites of the two countries.
  • Download As .Pdf

    Download As .Pdf

    PIRT UNESCO Heritage Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 UNESCO Heritage Sites .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Armenia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Technical Requirements, Issues and Solutions ...........................................................................................................................................................