SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC IDP Movements December 2020 IDP (Wos) Task Force

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC IDP Movements December 2020 IDP (WoS) Task Force December 2020 updates Governorate summary 19K In December 2020, the humanitarian community tracked some 43,000 IDP Aleppo 17K movements across Syria, similar to numbers tracked in November. As in 25K preceding months, most IDP movements were concentrated in northwest 21K Idleb 13K Syria, with 92 percent occurring within and between Aleppo and Idleb 15K governorates. 800 Ar-Raqqa 800 At the sub-district level, Dana in Idleb governorate and Ghandorah, Bulbul and 800 Sharan in Aleppo governorate each received around 2,800 IDP movements in 443 Lattakia 380 December. Afrin sub-district in Aleppo governorate received around 2,700 830 movements while Maaret Tamsrin sub-district in Idleb governorate and Raju 320 Tartous 230 71% sub-district in Aleppo governorate each received some 2,500 IDP movements. 611 of IDP arrivals At the community level, Tal Aghbar - Tal Elagher community in Aleppo 438 occurred within Hama 43 governorate received the largest number of displaced people, with around 350 governorate 2,000 movements in December, followed by some 1,000 IDP movements 245 received by Afrin community in Aleppo governorate. Around 800 IDP Homs 105 122 movements were received by Sheikh Bahr community in Aleppo governorate 0 Deir-ez-Zor and Ar-Raqqa city in Ar-Raqqa governorate, and Lattakia city in Lattakia 0 IDPs departure from governorate 290 n governorate, Koknaya community in Idleb governorate and Azaz community (includes displacement from locations within 248 governorate and to outside) in Aleppo governorate each received some 600 IDP movements this month. Damascus 0 0 Displacement within governorate These movements are estimated to mostly be incentivised by access to n 183 (include displacement within the same governorate services and livelihoods, and facilitated by reduced levels of shelling Al-Hasakeh 48 only) 56 compared to preceding months. IDPs arrival to governorate 72 n Rural Damascus 0 (includes displacement to locations within 0 governorate and from outside) IDP movements map (K: thousand) IDP Movements Al-Hasakeh 43,480 8.4K IDP movements Ar-Raqqa Aleppo 2.5K 607 Idleb 0.3K Communities Lattakia IDP movements refer to the number of IDPs arrivals in communities and may 0.2K include multiple/short term Hama Deir-ez-Zor displacements. Tartous Total IDP arrivals (by subdistrict) 1 - 1,000 Homs l l 1,001 - 5,000 l 5,001 - 10,000 l 10,001 - 20,000 l > 20,000 O No IDPs arrival reported l Total number of IDPs arrived Displacements by governorate IDP movements less than two hundred are not reflected on the map. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Arrows on the map do not depict actual IDP movement paths.Source: Information as reported by CCCM and HNAP for Dec 2020. Creation Date: 29 Jan 2021 Feedback: [email protected].

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Policy Notes for the Trump Notes Administration the Washington Institute for Near East Policy ■ 2018 ■ Pn55
TRANSITION 2017 POLICYPOLICY NOTES FOR THE TRUMP NOTES ADMINISTRATION THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ 2018 ■ PN55 TUNISIAN FOREIGN FIGHTERS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA AARON Y. ZELIN Tunisia should really open its embassy in Raqqa, not Damascus. That’s where its people are. —ABU KHALED, AN ISLAMIC STATE SPY1 THE PAST FEW YEARS have seen rising interest in foreign fighting as a general phenomenon and in fighters joining jihadist groups in particular. Tunisians figure disproportionately among the foreign jihadist cohort, yet their ubiquity is somewhat confounding. Why Tunisians? This study aims to bring clarity to this question by examining Tunisia’s foreign fighter networks mobilized to Syria and Iraq since 2011, when insurgencies shook those two countries amid the broader Arab Spring uprisings. ©2018 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ NO. 30 ■ JANUARY 2017 AARON Y. ZELIN Along with seeking to determine what motivated Evolution of Tunisian Participation these individuals, it endeavors to reconcile estimated in the Iraq Jihad numbers of Tunisians who actually traveled, who were killed in theater, and who returned home. The find- Although the involvement of Tunisians in foreign jihad ings are based on a wide range of sources in multiple campaigns predates the 2003 Iraq war, that conflict languages as well as data sets created by the author inspired a new generation of recruits whose effects since 2011. Another way of framing the discussion will lasted into the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. center on Tunisians who participated in the jihad fol- These individuals fought in groups such as Abu Musab lowing the 2003 U.S.
[Show full text]
Aleppo Governorate
Suruc ﺳورودج Oguzeli d أوﻏوﻠﯾزﯾﮫ d Şanlıurfa أوﻓﺔر DOWNLOAD MAP ZobarZorabi - C1948 اﻟﺠﻤﻬﻮرﻳﺔ اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ اﻟﺴــﻮرﻳﺔ SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC Estiqama زوﺑﺎر _زوراﺑﻲ - BabnBoban d C1975 C1966 d AinAlArab اﻻﻘﻣﺳﺎﺔﺗﻛ_ورﺑﺎ d C1946 ﺑﺎﺑﺎن _ﺑوﺑﺎن OrubaKor - Ali d ﻌﻟﻋرﯾ انب -Musabeyli Susan Sus C1956 MorshedMorshed Binar d d Reference Map C1980 Minasﻣوﺳﻠﺎﯾﺑﯾﮫ BijanTramk ﻋروﺑﺔﻛﻠ_ﻲو ﻋر ALEPPO GOVERNORATE d C1987 d C6340 Sharan ﺻو ص _ﺻوﺻﺎن C1961 ﻣرﻣ ﺷردﻧ ﺷﺑﺎدﯾر d - C1940 NafKarabnafKarab ﻧﺎﻣﯾس UpperQurran d Scan it! Navigate! d ﺑﯾﺟﺎن _ﺗﻣرك BigDuwara Jraqli - Qola d C1988 ﺷران with QR reader App with Avenza PDF C2021 d C1998 d Gh arib ﻧﺎﻛ رف بﻛ_ﻧرﺎﺑف C1990 AziziyehMom - anAzu Kalmad FirazdaqArsalan - Tash ﻗﻧﻲﻗﻓرﺎاو ن Maps App ﺧﺮﻳــﻄﺔ ﻣﺮﺟــﻌﻴﺔ d TalHajib d C6341 C1943 ﻗوﻻ ﻟداوﻛاﻟﺑﯾ راةرة _ﻠﻲﺟﺎﻗر Gaziantep d d d C1974 C1954 ﻣﺤــــﺎﻓـﻈـﺔ ﺣﻠﺐ ﻏرﯾ ب d C1949 d ﻣﻠدﻛ ﺗ لﺣﺎ ﺟ بd ﻔﻟرزادق_أرﺳﻼ طﺎن ش d ﻋزﯾزﯾﺔﻣ_ﻣوﺎ ﻋنزو Polateli Jebnet Shakriyeh- UpperJbeilehQorrat - Quri d KharabNas Karkamis C1995 d Mashko C1972 ﺑوﻠﻻﯾﺗﯾﮫ -QantarraQantaret Kikan ﻏﺎﻧﺗز ﺎﻋيب d s C1994 d Qarruf YadiHbabQawi - KorbinarNabaa - BigEin Elbat C1967ﺟlu/ﻠabرا aJrﺑس C1936 ﻧﻲﻗﻗﻓﻗﺎوو ﻠ_رﺟﺑﺔةرﯾي ﻧﺟﺔﺑ ﻛﺎﻛﻣرﺎﯾ س ﺧرﻧاﺎ بس d C1985 C1976 C1962 C1957 ﻟﺷاﻛﺎرﯾﺔﻣ_ﻛﺷو d d ﻧطﻘﻧرطﻟﻛةﻛﻗ ﯾﺎرا_ةن KherbetAtu d ﻛﺎ isﻛﻣ/رﺎﯾ amسKark ﻛ ﻟﻋﺑﯾﺑﯾ طانر KharanKort ﻧﻌﺑﺔﻟﻛ_اورﻧﺑﺎﯾر ﻟﺣاﺑﺎ ب ﯾﻗ_دو يي ﻗروف Jarablus Shankal ] C2001 d d d JilJilak d MeidanEkbis Kusan C2227 ShehamaBandar - C1968 C1482 d C2012 C1964 ﺧر ﺑﻋطﺔو C1488 C1490d d ﺧراﻛ وبرت d UpperDar Elbaz BigMazraet Sofi ﺟﻠراﺑس - HjeilehJrables ﺟﯾل _ﻠكﺟﯾ MaydanKork - Kitan
[Show full text]
Consumed by War the End of Aleppo and Northern Syria’S Political Order
STUDY Consumed by War The End of Aleppo and Northern Syria’s Political Order KHEDER KHADDOUR October 2017 n The fall of Eastern Aleppo into rebel hands left the western part of the city as the re- gime’s stronghold. A front line divided the city into two parts, deepening its pre-ex- isting socio-economic divide: the west, dominated by a class of businessmen; and the east, largely populated by unskilled workers from the countryside. The mutual mistrust between the city’s demographic components increased. The conflict be- tween the regime and the opposition intensified and reinforced the socio-economic gap, manifesting it geographically. n The destruction of Aleppo represents not only the destruction of a city, but also marks an end to the set of relations that had sustained and structured the city. The conflict has been reshaping the domestic power structures, dissolving the ties be- tween the regime in Damascus and the traditional class of Aleppine businessmen. These businessmen, who were the regime’s main partners, have left the city due to the unfolding war, and a new class of business figures with individual ties to regime security and business figures has emerged. n The conflict has reshaped the structure of northern Syria – of which Aleppo was the main economic, political, and administrative hub – and forged a new balance of power between Aleppo and the north, more generally, and the capital of Damascus. The new class of businessmen does not enjoy the autonomy and political weight in Damascus of the traditional business class; instead they are singular figures within the regime’s new power networks and, at present, the only actors through which to channel reconstruction efforts.
[Show full text]
Operation Euphrates Shield: Implementation and Lessons Learned Lessons and Implementation Shield: Euphrates Operation
REPORT REPORT OPERATION EUPHRATES SHIELD: IMPLEMENTATION OPERATION AND LESSONS LEARNED EUPHRATES MURAT YEŞILTAŞ, MERVE SEREN, NECDET ÖZÇELIK The report presents a one-year assessment of the Operation Eu- SHIELD phrates Shield (OES) launched on August 24, 2016 and concluded on March 31, 2017 and examines Turkey’s future road map against the backdrop of the developments in Syria. IMPLEMENTATION AND In the first section, the report analyzes the security environment that paved the way for OES. In the second section, it scrutinizes the mili- tary and tactical dimensions and the course of the operation, while LESSONS LEARNED in the third section, it concentrates on Turkey’s efforts to establish stability in the territories cleansed of DAESH during and after OES. In the fourth section, the report investigates military and political MURAT YEŞILTAŞ, MERVE SEREN, NECDET ÖZÇELIK lessons that can be learned from OES, while in the fifth section, it draws attention to challenges to Turkey’s strategic preferences and alternatives - particularly in the north of Syria - by concentrating on the course of events after OES. OPERATION EUPHRATES SHIELD: IMPLEMENTATION AND LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS AND IMPLEMENTATION SHIELD: EUPHRATES OPERATION ANKARA • ISTANBUL • WASHINGTON D.C. • KAHIRE OPERATION EUPHRATES SHIELD IMPLEMENTATION AND LESSONS LEARNED COPYRIGHT © 2017 by SETA All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, without permission in writing from the publishers. SETA Publications 97 ISBN: 978-975-2459-39-7 Layout: Erkan Söğüt Print: Turkuvaz Haberleşme ve Yayıncılık A.Ş., İstanbul SETA | FOUNDATION FOR POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Nenehatun Caddesi No: 66 GOP Çankaya 06700 Ankara TURKEY Tel: +90 312.551 21 00 | Fax :+90 312.551 21 90 www.setav.org | [email protected] | @setavakfi SETA | İstanbul Defterdar Mh.
[Show full text]
WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 31 May - 6 June 2021
WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 31 May - 6 June 2021 SYRIA SUMMARY • The predominantly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) cracks down on anti-conscription protests in Manbij, Aleppo Governorate. • The Government of Syria (GoS) offers to defer military service for people wanted in southern Syria. • ISIS assassinates a prominent religious leader in Deir-ez-Zor city. Figure 1: Dominant actors’ area of control and influence in Syria as of 6 June 2021. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. Also, please see footnote 1. Page 1 of 5 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 31 May - 6 June 2021 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 Figure 2: Anti-conscription protests and related events in Manbij, Aleppo Governorate between 31 May – 6 June. Data from The Carter Center and ACLED. Conscription in Northwest Syria In 2019, the Kurdish Autonomous Administration (KAA) issued a controversial conscription law for territories under its control.2 in February, the Syrian Network For Human Rights claimed that the conscription of teachers deprived half a million students of a proper education. 3 People in the region argue that the forcible recruitment and arrests by SDF have disrupted economic life.4 In late May, the SDF escalated its recruitment effort.5 31 May 1 Figure 1 depicts areas of the dominant actors’ control and influence. While “control” is a relative term in a complex, dynamic conflict, territorial control is defined as an entity having power over use of force as well as civil/administrative functions in an area. Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah maintain a presence in Syrian government-controlled territory. Non-state organized armed groups (NSOAG), including the Kurdish-dominated SDF and Turkish-backed opposition groups operate in areas not under GoS control.
[Show full text]
Regional Analysis Syria
Overview REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA Total number ‘in need of assistance’: 4 million Number of governorates affected by conflict: 14 out of 14 28 January 2013 Content Part I Overview Part I – Syria Information gaps and data limitations Operational constraints This Regional Analysis of the Syria Conflict (RAS) seeks to bring together information from all sources in Humanitarian profile the region and provide holistic analysis of the overall Country sectoral analysis Syria crisis. While Part I focuses on the situation Governorate profiles within Syria, Part II covers the impact of the crisis on Forthcoming reports the neighbouring countries. The Syria Needs Analysis Annex A: Baseline Data Project welcomes all information that could complement this report. For additional information, Annex B: Definitions Humanitarian Profile comments or questions, please email Annex C: Stakeholder profile [email protected] Priority needs The priority needs below are based on known information. Little or no information is Multiple media sources available for Al-Hasakeh, Ar-Raqqa, Deir-ez-Zor, Hama, Lattakia and Tartous in the north and for As-Sweida, Damascus city, Damascus rural and Quneitra in the south. This is due to the prioritisation of other governorates, limited information sharing and to access issues. Information is being gathered on some cities and governorates (such as Aleppo, Idleb, Dar’a and Homs) although not all is available to the wider humanitarian community for a variety of reasons. Displacement: There is little clear information on the number of IDPs: ministries PROTECTION is a priority throughout the country, specifically: of the GoS report 150,000 IDPs residing in 626 collective centres and more in some 1,468 schools but no figures are available for the number residing in direct threat to life from the conflict private accommodation (with or without host families).
[Show full text]
1 of 7 Weekly Conflict Summary May 18-24, 2017 This Reporting Period
Weekly Conflict Summary May 18-24, 2017 This reporting period, intra-opposition strife continued in Aleppo province but has eased in Rural Damascus. Evacuation deals continued, most notably in Damascus and Homs. Coalition warplanes struck pro-government Iranian-backed militias in the southeastern Syrian desert as the groups advanced against FSA forces in the area. ISIS forces continued to crumble on fronts in Aleppo, Homs, and Raqqa. Figure 1 - Areas of control in Syria by May 24, with arrows indicating advances since the start of the reporting period 1 of 7 Weekly Conflict Summary – May 18-24, 2017 Opposition Strife After weeks of clashes between Jaysh al-Islam and groups aligned with Hai’yat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS, formerly al-Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra) in the opposition-held Eastern Ghouta pocket near Damascus, struggles between opposition forces in the area seem to have calmed down. Jaysh al-Islam fighters returned to fronts against pro-government units in Beit Nayem and launched attacks on al-Rihan neighborhood in Damascus, while Faylaq al-Rahman resumed clashes against pro-government formations in Arbin (see map below). Figure 2 – Map of areas of control around Damascus and the Eastern Ghouta by May 24 Even as Eastern Ghouta fighting quieted, new intra-opposition clashes between Faylak al-Sham against Levantine Front and the Sultan Murad Brigades erupted in the northern Aleppo countryside east of Al-Rai. On May 23, Levantine Front forces attacked and captured Faylaq al-Sham positions in Kafr Ghan, Baraghideh, and Sheikh Rih after accusing them of working with HTS. Levantine Front and Sultan Murad Brigades stated that a portion of Faylak al-Sham’s subunit, Liwa Fursan al-Thawra (formerly part of HTS sub-unit Nour al-Din al-Zenki), was harboring HTS fighters within it.
[Show full text]
WFP Syria Situation Report #1 Page | 2 January 2021
WFP Syria In Numbers Situation Report #1 12.4 million people food insecure January 2021 sddwaazA 1.3 million severely food insecure 6.7 million people internally displaced Highlights • A record 12.4 million people, 60 percent of the Syrian population, are now food insecure, according to the results of the nationwide food security assessment conducted in late 2020; by far the highest number ever recorded. 45% 4.8 million people assisted 55% • The number of people food insecure has January 2021 (based on dispatches) increased by 4.5 million people in just one year, with the number of people severely food insecure more than doubling. WFP Syria Interim Country Strategic Plan (ICSP) • Floods caused by heavy rainfall severely impacted Overall requirement: IDP sites in north-western Syria, with thousands of 2021 Syrian Arab Republic USD 4.2 billion WFP beneficiaries affected. WFP provided ready- Humanitarian Response Plan WFP share: to-eat rations to some 8,500 affected people in USD 1.2 billion January. WFP 6-Month Net Funding Requirement USD 377.7 m • At least two people were killed, and several others (February 2021 – July 2021) As of 22 January 2021 injured in two separate bomb explosions in WFP Syria 2019-2020 Interim Country Strategic Plan Jandaris and Afrin cities of northern Aleppo (November 2018) governorate in early January. Interim Country Strategic Plan Revision 03 (December 2020) Situation Update Food Security Situation • 12.4 million people, close to 60 percent of the total population of Syria, are currently assessed to be food insecure, according to the results of the nationwide food security and livelihoods assessment conducted by WFP and the Whole-of-Syria Food Security Sector over the fourth quarter of 2020.
[Show full text]
WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 27 April - 3 May 2020
WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 27 April - 3 May 2020 SYRIA SUMMARY • NORTHWEST| Hayyat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) faced protests after opening a controversial commercial crossing with Government of Syria (GoS). A fuel tanker explosion in Afrin killed 53 people. Infighting between Turkish- backed armed opposition groups escalated in Jarabulus, Aleppo Governorate. • SOUTH & CENTRAL | Clashes between As-Sweida and Dara’a militias continued. Attacks against GoS personnel and positions continued in Dara’a Governorate. Israel attacked pro-Iranian militias and GoS positions across southern Syria. ISIS killed several GoS armed forces personnel. • NORTHEAST | ISIS prisoners attempted to escape Ghoweran jail in Al- Hassakah Governorate. Violence against civilians continued across northeast Syria. Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) faced increased attacks from unidentified gunmen and Turkish armed forces. Coalition forces carried out their first airstrikes since 11 March. Figure 1: Dominant actors’ area of control and influence in Syria as of 3 May 2020. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. Also, please see the footnote on page 2. Page 1 of 6 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 27 April – 3 May 2020 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 After announcing plans to open a commercial crossing with GoS territory, protests erupted against HTS (see figure 2). Civilians protested the crossing over fears of normalization with GoS and of spreading COVID-19. On 30 April, Maaret al Naasan (Idlib Governorate) residents protested at the crossing and blocked commercial trucks attempting to cross into GoS areas. HTS violently dispersed the protests, killing one. Following the protests, HTS brought reinforcements to Maaret al Naasan. The same day, HTS announced that it had suspended the opening of the commercial crossing.2 On 1 May, protests continued against HTS across Idlib and Aleppo Governorates in 10 locations.3 Smaller protests were recorded in 2 May in Kafr Takharim and Ariha in Idlib Governorate.
[Show full text]
WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 7 - 13 June 2021
WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 7 - 13 June 2021 SYRIA SUMMARY • Turkey accuses Kurdish armed groups of attacking a hospital in Afrin, Aleppo Governorate. • Israel attacks Government of Syria (GoS) armed forces positions in Rural Damascus and Homs Governorates. • The opposition’s Sharqiya Brigade clash with Iranian-backed militia fighters in Deir-ez-Zor Governorate. Figure 1: Dominant actors’ area of control and influence in Syria as of 13 June 2021. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. Also, please see footnote 1. Page 1 of 5 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 7 – 13 June 2021 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 Figure 2: Conflict between Turkish armed forces and Turkish-backed armed opposition groups on the one side and GoS armed forces and Kurdish militias on the other between 7-13 June 2021. Data from The Carter Center and ACLED. Conflict in Aleppo Governorate Turkey justifies its control of territory in northern Syria as a secure zone along the border to prevent alleged threats from armed Kurdish groups. 2 Shelling and clashes along the frontlines between Turkish armed forces and Turkish-backed armed opposition groups on the one side and Government of Syria (GoS) armed forces and the predominantly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) on the other side are frequent. 12 June Unidentified missile strikes destroyed the Al-Shifa hospital in Afrin, Aleppo Governorate, killing 15 people. 34 Turkish armed forces accused the SDF of 1 Figure 1 depicts areas of the dominant actors’ control and influence. While “control” is a relative term in a complex, dynamic conflict, territorial control is defined as an entity having power over use of force as well as civil/administrative functions in an area.
[Show full text]
Nw Syria Sitrep23 20201221.Pdf (English)
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC Recent Developments in Northwest Syria Situation Report No. 23 - As of 21 December 2020 2.7M displaced people living in northwest Syria 1,214 active IDP sites in northwest Syria 1.5M displaced people living in IDP sites 80% of people in IDP sites are women and children Source: CCCM Cluster, November 2020 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. HIGHLIGHTS • 19,447 cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed in northwest Syria, while COVID-19 associated deaths tripled since last month. • Two new COVID-19 testing laboratories, one additional hospital, four new COVID-19 community-based treatment centres (CCTC) and a quarantine centre were operationalised in northwest Syria during the reporting period. • A funding shortfall leading to significant gaps in water and sanitation services has resulted in people in need of these services increasing by over 1.8 million people in the last 3 months, including for water provision through networks and water stations, hygiene kits, solid waste disposal, sanitation services and water trucking services. • Nearly 250,000 people were reached by Shelter/NFI partners with winterisation assistance in November. Such support remains vital as winter progresses, including in the form of multi-purpose cash. SITUATION OVERVIEW Ongoing hostilities: Hostilities continue to impact communities across northwest Syria, especially in areas near the M4 and M5 highways in Idleb governorate. With some 400,000 people living along the M4 and M5 highways, any escalation would have devastating humanitarian consequences. The security situation is further undermined by the prevalence of explosive hazards and in-fighting between non-state armed groups (NSAGs), which take a toll on civilian life.
[Show full text]
Weekly Conflict Summary
Weekly Conflict Summary August 11-17, 2016 Continuing a trend from previous weeks, reports of conflict in Syria from August 11-17 remained extremely high in Aleppo governorate. Throughout this period, the majority of conflict took place in the northern governorates, though several events of humanitarian concern continue outside of northern Syria as well. After months of gains in the countryside and weeks of slow-but-steady advance in urban Menbij, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) took control of the city from ISIS. Over the weekend, SDF fighters began to de-mine the city and confirmed control of Menbij by August 17. After more than two months of conflict, the medical services of the city are badly damaged, severely lacking medical personnel, medicine, and necessary supplies. In some cases, nurses and medics have no capacity to respond to critical injuries from landmines in the city and nearby countryside. During the week of August 15, a renewed pro-government counter-offensive in southwest Aleppo city afforded significant results. By August 17, much of the 1070 Apartments located in Ramousa neighborhood had been recaptured by pro-government forces. The apartments border the Ramousa highway, which the opposition was attempting to use as a resupply route into East Aleppo. Both opposition and government-controlled areas of Aleppo city are receiving only limited shipments of food, aid, and other goods as forces from both sides restrict badly damaged resupply routes. No roadblocks have yet been installed on either resupply line in the south of Aleppo. Figure 1 - Frontlines in Aleppo by August 17 and two resupply routes.
[Show full text]