DOCSLIB.ORG

Charles Lyell's Debt to North America: His Lectures and Travels from 53 1841 to 1853

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charles Lyell's Debt to North America: His Lectures and Travels from 53 1841 to 1853 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Charles Lyelrs debt to North America: his lectures and travels from 1841 to 1853 ROBERT H. DOTT, JR Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA Abstract: Charles and Mary Lyell visited North America four times from 1841 to 1853. During the first three visits, Lyell lectured and they travelled widely. The lectures were great successes with the American public in spite of Lyell's poor elocutionary skills. Comparisons of lecture topics covered over a decade provide insights into the rapid development of the young science of geology and of Lyell's changing preoccupations. Included were crustal movements; uniformity of causes through time; coral reefs and oceanic subsidence; Carboniferous conditions; the early appearance of reptiles; palaeoclimate; the submergence of land and the origin of drift; biogeo- graphy; and a uniform organic plan with arguments against transmutation and historical pro- gression. The Lyells saw more of the United States and Canada than had most citizens. Their conveyances included horseback, stagecoach, train, railroad handcar, and steamboat. Accommodation varied from elegant hostelries to dirt-floored shacks. Their travels took them from the Atlantic coast to the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers and from the St Lawrence valley to the Gulf Coast. America gained from Lyell the enhancement of the stature of geology, several original contributions to the understanding of its geology, and a positive impression of the New World conveyed back to Britain. Lyell's reward was greater, however, thanks to the generosity of American guidance in his field work. He gained many fresh geological examples for his books, published two travel journals and more than 30 journal articles and presented at least eight lectures in Britain about American geology, making him the local British authority on America. He especially gained new evidence for his opposition to biological progression and for his submergence theory for the drift. Besides enhancing his geological reputation, Lyell also made an incisive comparison of British and American education, which drew him into public reforms at home sponsored by Prince Albert. Finally, his exposure to American Unitarianism, coupled with disenchantment with the Anglican Church, caused Lyell to shift his religious allegiance. For many years, a myth prevailed that Charles Lyell lished or republished in America. Consequently, a came in 1841 like a crusading white knight and full spectrum of geological opinions was well rescued North American geology from the twin entrenched, which was no more Wernerian or pagan heresies of neptunism and catastrophism. catastrophist than prevailed in Europe. Nonethe- The reality is that geology was already well less, the visit of one of Britain's most prominent developed and becoming professionalized in geologists was an important event. The status of America (Carozzi 1990; Newell 1993). At least half American geology could only be enhanced by such a dozen British ~migr6 geologists had preceded a visit and local practitioners were anxious to show Lyell and an equal number of American-born off their accomplishments, which they did by geologists had spent time in Europe, several of the escorting Lyell to the field and by having him latter having met Lyell before his first visit. participate in the third annual meeting of the Benjamin Silliman's American Journal of Science, American Association of Geologists at Boston in established in 1818, carried accounts of important April 1842 (American Association of Geologists European developments and reprinted in toto 1843, p. 42-76). Lyell was duly impressed with the numerous foreign articles, including some by Lyell. quality of American work, and both he and Mary Several years had elapsed since the first publication Lyell were captivated by the great energy and of Lyell's Principles of Geology in 1830--1833 and friendliness of the egalitarian Americans. Lyell Elements of Geology in 1838. A number of books summarized their feelings nicely when he told the on geology, including unauthorized editions of both audience at the close of his 1842 New York lectures Principles and Elements, had already been pub- that 'I shall always look back to the time spent here Doa-r, R. H. JR 1998. Charles Lyell's debt to North America: his lectures and travels from 53 1841 to 1853. In: BLUNDELL,D. J. & ScoTr, A. C. (eds) Lyell: the Past is the Key to the Present. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 143, 53-69. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 54 R.H. DO'IT, JR with a home-feeling, which will always make it 1981; Dott 1996). Because there was much difficult to regard America as a foreign land.' feedback between Lyell's American geological (Raymond 1842-1843, p. 52) (Note I Appendix). travels and the lectures, I felt it important to study It seems clear, however, that ultimately LyelI them together. This exercise has illuminated the gained more from his four visits to North America substantial debt to America that Lyell accumulated between 1841 and 1853 than did his New World for important evidence to support many of his hosts. He came with a definite agenda and with ideas, especially anti-progression and the origin of London as his chief audience. First, with his chosen drift. vocation of publishing for profit, he recognized the potential of the American market and the need to The lectures negotiate contracts for the publication of his books there in order to stop the plagiarism that had The Boston Lowell Lectures were endowed in the already occurred. Second, he could exploit the great will of John Lowell, Jr in 1836 to provide free popularity of exploration travel journals by publish- lectures to benefit the people of Boston (Weeks ing popular accounts of his experiences in America. 1966). Public lectures were then very popular in Third, he could communicate the results of his America, where self improvement enjoyed higher American geological investigations through letters status than the passive entertainment of the to the Geological Society of London, where they theatre, especially in Boston. They were also a would be read orally and published promptly. perfect vehicle for popularizing science. Benjamin Finally, upon returning home, he could publish full Silliman had opened the first lecture season in 1840 journal articles about American geology. That he in grand style and apparently suggested Lyell to succeeded spectacularly is attested by contem- inaugurate the second season. Accordingly, Charles porary London newspaper and scientific journal and his charming wife, Mary Homer Lyell, arrived accounts of his travels, the addition to his publi- in Halifax on 31 July 1841 for a 121/2 month visit to cation list of two travel books (Lyell 1845, 1849), the United States and Canada, the beginning of a and more than 33 published letters and articles great adventure in the New World which would (Skinner 1978). In addition, he obtained countless span 12 years. The American Journal of Science in examples of American geological phenomena to August 1841 carried an enthusiastic notice of the embellish his books and to support his position on Lyell's arrival, the scheduled course of lectures at such important issues as the theory of marine sub- the Lowell Institute, and their subsequent itinerary. mergence and floating ice for drift, his anti- Three Boston newspapers also carried advertise- progressionist and steady-state view of earth ments of the 12 lectures on geology, which were history, and his scheme for subdividing the Tertiary. presented from 19 October to 27 November 1841 Indeed, he was so successful that he quickly (Dott 1996). The audience averaged about 3000 became the local London authority on North enthusiastic and attentive 'persons of both sexes, of America, thus enhancing his already substantial every station in society ... all well dressed and reputation and increasing the intensity of his rivalry observing the utmost decorum' (Lyell 1845, p. 86). with Roderick Murchison (Page 1976). (Note 2 Lyell was delighted to receive US $2000 (more Appendix). than US $30,000 in today's dollars), which was The present article provides a condensed account three times the going fee in London for the most from my more extended treatment of Lyell's three reknowned lecturers. This, together with smaller series of lectures and associated travels in America fees for repeat offerings of the lectures in over an 11 year period during a very important time Philadelphia and New York, would finance the in the history of geology (Dott 1996). Lyell's Lyells' extensive travels in America (Fig. 1). lectures and his American writings provide valu- Lyell's Lowell Lectures of 1841, 1845 and 1852 able insight into the development of his thinking; were all poorly reported by the Boston news- they also provide evidence of his interactions with papers. By contrast, the 1842 repeat lectures in the American community, which were not entirely Philadelphia and New York were thoroughly amicable. After Lyell's first seven months in reported, with the New York series (condensed to America, during which he had been guided by more eight lectures) being published verbatim as a than a dozen of the country's leading geologists and pamphlet with 16 illustrations taken from Lyell's naturalists, his hosts became apprehensive that this Principles of Geology (1830-1833) and Elements guest would publish their data before they could do of Geology (1838, 1841) (Raymond 1842-1843). so (Newell 1993; Silliman 1995). Discussions of Lyell's surviving handwritten notes for many the American visits have appeared before in Lyell's lectures and Mary Lyell's correspondence from own travel journals, his published correspondence America provide additional evidence about the (Lyell 1881), biographies (Bonney 1895; Bailey content of this first lecture series and they are the 1963; Wilson 1998) and other writings (Brice 1978, principal sources for the 1845 and 1852 series, for Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 LYELL'S DEBT TO NORTH AMERICA 55 Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lieftinck Lectures
    Lieftinck Lectures Handwritten Text Recognition Meets the Crowd: Transcribe Bentham and tranScriptorium (22 April, 2015) Dr. Melissa Terras (University College London) The challenges for the automated reading of handwritten scripts, and for the computational recognition and transcription of archival material, are enormous. In this lecture, an example of hopeful advances in Pattern Recognition, Computer Vision, Document Image Analysis, Language Modelling, Digital Humanities, and Archival Research which are coming together to develop Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) will be presented: The European FP7 Funded tranScriptorium project. Central to its development has been the reuse of crowdsourced transcriptions from Transcribe Bentham: over 5 million words transcribed by volunteer labour provide a “ground truth” with which we can train computers to read handwriting. The lecture will cover the aims and development of the tranScriptorium project, and ask: what next for HTR as applied to archival manuscripts? For more information about Dr. Melissa Terras click here. Lieftinck Lectures are free and open to all. Please RSVP to Erik Kwakkel by 17 April. Rubricating History in Late Medieval France (16 May, 2014) Leiden University Library, 3-4 pm Dr. Godfried Croenen, University of Liverpool (Senior Lecturer in French Historical Studies) Most of the manuscripts produced in late medieval Paris, including the many with historiographical texts, contain a more or less complex system of textual divisions articulated partly by rubrics. Some of these texts
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Press Release Issued: Wednesday 12th August 2020 Darwin mentor and geology pioneer Charles Lyell’s archives reunited Fascinating writings of an influential scientist who shaped Charles Darwin’s thinking have become part of the University of Edinburgh’s collections. A rich assortment of letters, books, manuscripts, maps and sketches by Scottish geologist Sir Charles Lyell, have been reassembled at the University Library’s Centre for Research Collections, with the goal of making the collection more accessible to the public. Some 294 notebooks, purchased from the Lyell family following a £1 million fundraising campaign in 2019, form a key part of the collection. Although written in the Victorian era, the works shed light on current concerns, including climate change and threats to biodiversity. Now a second tranche of Lyell material has been allocated to the University by HM Government under the Acceptance in Lieu of Inheritance Tax scheme. These new acquisitions, from the estate of the 3rd Baron Lyell, will join other items that have been part of the University’s collections since 1927. The new archive includes more than 900 letters, with correspondence between Lyell and Darwin, the botanist Joseph Dalton Hooker, the publisher John Murray and Lyell’s wife, Mary Horner Lyell, and many others. It also includes a draft manuscript and heavily annotated editions of Lyell’s landmark book The Principles of Geology and several manuscripts from his lectures. Lyell, who died in 1875, aged 77, mentored Sir Charles Darwin after the latter’s return from his five-year voyage on the Beagle in 1836. The Scot is also credited with providing the framework that helped Darwin develop his evolutionary theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): a Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer
    ROCK STARS Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): A Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer Rasoul Sorkhabi, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA; [email protected] years later, but there he learned how to write reports. Meanwhile, he read every geology book he could find, including John Playfair’s Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory, Henry de la Beche’s Geological Manual, Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology, and Hugh Miller’s The Old Red Sandstone. BECOMING A GEOLOGIST In the summer of 1851, while the Great Exhibition in London was attracting so many people, Geikie decided instead to visit the Island of Arran in the Clyde estuary and study its geology, aided by a brief report by Andrew Ramsay of the British Geological Survey. Geikie came back with a report titled “Three weeks in Arran by a young geologist,” published that year in the Edinburgh News. This report impressed Hugh Miller so much that the renowned geologist invited its young author to discuss geology over a cup of tea. Miller became Geikie’s first mentor. In this period, Geikie became acquainted with local scientists and pri- vately studied chemistry, mineralogy, and geology under Scottish naturalists, such as George Wilson, Robert Chambers, John Fleming, James Forbes, and Andrew Ramsay—to whom he con- fessed his desire to join the Geological Survey. In 1853, Geikie visited the islands of Skye and Pabba off the coast Figure 1. Archibald Geikie as a young geolo- of Scotland and reported his observations of rich geology, including gist in Edinburgh. (Photo courtesy of the British Geological Survey, probably taken in finds of Liassic fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific BIOGRAPHY and the CASE of GEORGES CUVIER
    Hist. Sci.) xiv (1976), 101-137 1976HisSc..14..101O SCIENTIFic BIOGRAPHY AND THE CASE OF GEORGES CUVIER: WITH A CRITICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY Dorinda OutralU University of Reading The purpose of this introduction is to provide some interpretative tools for the reader of the body of secondary literature on Georges Cuvier which is examined in the attached critical bibliography. Criticism and analysis of existing work is therefore emphasized, and the problems in­ volved in constructing a positive biography of Cuvier are only briefly examined. Not only strictly biographical studies, but also work on all aspects of Cuvier's achievement, have been so strongly informed by pre­ suppositions about his character, that a knowledge of this bias and its characteristic expressions is nece.<;sary before previous work on Cuvier can be properly interp'reted. This bibliography is thus also intended as a necessary clearing of the ground before further study of Cuvier's career can be undertaken. This is true not only because it is necessary to discover the precise extent of factual inadequacy in our knowledge of Cuvier's life and achievement, but also because we need to increase our awareness of the role which biographical inquiry has played in the history of science, for without this awareness, the full implications of the adoption of the form cannot be assessed. Interest in Georges Cuvier has increased considerably during the last decade, but so far almost no account has been taken of the extraordinary biographical tradition through which we view him. Almost every presen­ tation of Cuvier since his death in 1832 has been dominated by emphases which were established very soon afterwards, and which have continued to monopolize the attention of historians of the life-sciences until very recently.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Advancement of Science: James Mckeen Cattell and the Networks Of
    1 The Advancement of Science: James McKeen Cattell and the Networks of Prestige and Authority, 1894-1915 ROBIN VANDOME The need for an authoritative and widely-accessible American scientific periodical was keenly felt by 1880, when the weekly Science was established in New York by the journalist John Michels, with the financial backing of scientific entrepreneur Thomas Edison. As the astronomer and mathematician Simon Newcomb had observed with regret in 1874, “The difficulty is not that our scientific men are indifferent to knowledge, but that they do not go through the laborious and thankless process of digesting and elaborating their knowledge and publishing it to the world.”1 Some promising scientific publications had, in fact, emerged, ranging from the commercial Scientific American (established in 1846) and the specialist American Naturalist (established in 1867 and limited, as Newcomb noted, “entirely to biology”), to the more philosophically-inclined magazine aimed at a broadly-educated audience, Popular Science Monthly (established in 1872).2 But the only periodical that met Newcomb’s high standards for the publication of new research was the venerable American Journal of Science and Arts (established in 1818), and even that title was restricted largely to the earth sciences at the expense of many new disciplines.3 Multiple efforts to cater to general scientific interests in a single periodical were made in the 1870s and 1880s, only for most to flounder after a few months or years, in line with the typical pattern for new magazines in this period.4 The shorter-lived contemporaries of Science included the Science Record (1872-77), Scientific Monthly (1875-76), Scientific Observer (1877-87), Science News (1878-79), Illustrated Scientific News (1878-81), Scientific Man (1878-82), a second Science Record (1884-85), Science Review (1885-86), and Science and Education (1886-87), among still others.5 By 1900, however, Science clearly 2 filled the gap felt by the likes of Newcomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Case Study 25
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Brief Description of item(s) 294 manuscript notebooks of the geologist Sir Charles Lyell (1797-1875). In two series: 263 numbered notebooks, 1825-1874, on geology, natural history, social and political subjects; 31 additional notebooks, 1818-1871, with indices. Mostly octavo format. For details see Appendix 1. In good condition. 2. Context The nineteenth century saw public debate about how to conduct science reach new heights. Charles Lyell was a pivotal figure in the establishment of geology as a scientific discipline; he also transformed ideas about the relationship between human history and the history of the earth. Above all, he revealed the significance of ‘deep time’. At a time when the Anglican church dominated intellectual culture, geology was a controversial subject. Lyell played a significant part in separating the practice of science from that of religion. Through his major work, The Principles of Geology, he developed the method later adopted by Darwin for his studies into evolution. Lyell observed natural phenomena at first hand to infer their underlying causes, which he used to interpret the phenomena of the past. The method stressed not only a vast geological timescale, but also the ability of small changes to produce, eventually, large ones. The Principles combined natural history, theology, political economy, anthropology, travel, and geography. It was an immediate success, in Britain, Europe, North America and Australia. Scientists, theologians, leading authors, explorers, artists, and an increasingly educated public read and discussed it. Lyell’s inductive method strongly influenced the generation of naturalists after Darwin. Over the rest of his life, Lyell revised the Principles in the light of new research and his own changing ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830S-1860S)
    Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Hung, Kuang-Chi. 2013. Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Citation Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s). Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Accessed April 17, 2018 4:20:57 PM EDT Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11181178 This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH Terms of Use repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA (Article begins on next page) Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) A dissertation presented by Kuang-Chi Hung to The Department of the History of Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts July 2013 © 2013–Kuang-Chi Hung All rights reserved Dissertation Advisor: Janet E. Browne Kuang-Chi Hung Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) Abstract It is well known that American botanist Asa Gray’s 1859 paper on the floristic similarities between Japan and the United States was among the earliest applications of Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory in plant geography. Commonly known as Gray’s “disjunction thesis,” Gray's diagnosis of that previously inexplicable pattern not only provoked his famous debate with Louis Agassiz but also secured his role as the foremost advocate of Darwin and Darwinism in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Henry Huxley
    A Most Eminent Victorian: Thomas Henry Huxley journals.openedition.org/cve/526 Résumé Huxley coined the word agnostic to describe his own philosophical framework in part to distinguish himself from materialists, atheists, and positivists. In this paper I will elaborate on exactly what Huxley meant by agnosticism by discussing his views on the distinctions he drew between philosophy and science, science and theology, and between theology and religion. His claim that theology belonged to the realm of the intellect while religion belonged to the realm of feeling served as an important strategy in his defense of evolution. Approaching Darwin’s theory in the spirit of Goethe’s Thatige Skepsis or active skepticism, he showed that most of the “scientific” objections to evolution were at their root religiously based. Huxley maintained that the question of “man’s place in nature” should be approached independently of the question of origins, yet at the same time argued passionately and eloquently that even if humans shared a common a origin with the apes, this did not make humans any less special. Because evolution was so intertwined with the questions of belief, of morals and of ethics, and Huxley was the foremost defender of Darwin’s ideas in the English- speaking world, he was at the center of the discussions as Victorians struggled with trying to reconcile the growing gulf between science and faith. Haut de page Entrées d’index Mots-clés : croyance, époque victorienne, Bible, agnosticisme, Metaphysical Society, conversion, catholicisme, Dracula, Martineau (Harriet), Huxley (Thomas Henry) Keywords: belief, Victorian times, Bible, agnosticism, Metaphysical Society, conversion, Catholicism, Dracula, Martineau (Harriet), Huxley (Thomas Henry) Haut de page 1/19 Texte intégral PDF Signaler ce document The line between biology, morals, and magic is still not generally known and admitted.
    [Show full text]
  • James Hutton's Reputation Among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    The Geological Society of America Memoir 216 Revising the Revisions: James Hutton’s Reputation among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries A. M. Celâl Şengör* İTÜ Avrasya Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü ve Maden Fakültesi, Jeoloji Bölümü, Ayazağa 34469 İstanbul, Turkey ABSTRACT A recent fad in the historiography of geology is to consider the Scottish polymath James Hutton’s Theory of the Earth the last of the “theories of the earth” genre of publications that had begun developing in the seventeenth century and to regard it as something behind the times already in the late eighteenth century and which was subsequently remembered only because some later geologists, particularly Hutton’s countryman Sir Archibald Geikie, found it convenient to represent it as a precursor of the prevailing opinions of the day. By contrast, the available documentation, pub- lished and unpublished, shows that Hutton’s theory was considered as something completely new by his contemporaries, very different from anything that preceded it, whether they agreed with him or not, and that it was widely discussed both in his own country and abroad—from St. Petersburg through Europe to New York. By the end of the third decade in the nineteenth century, many very respectable geologists began seeing in him “the father of modern geology” even before Sir Archibald was born (in 1835). Before long, even popular books on geology and general encyclopedias began spreading the same conviction. A review of the geological literature of the late eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries shows that Hutton was not only remembered, but his ideas were in fact considered part of the current science and discussed accord- ingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of English [email protected] Rutgers University Leahprice.Org DATE of BIRTH: October 1970. Citizenship: USA. H
    LEAH PRICE Department of English [email protected] Rutgers University leahprice.org DATE OF BIRTH: October 1970. Citizenship: USA. EMPLOYMENT: Henry Rutgers Distinguished Professor of English, Rutgers University (2019--) Founding director of Rutgers Initiative for the Book Professor of English, Harvard University. Francis Lee Higginson Professor, 2013-- Chair, History and Literature Program, 2007-12 Harvard College Professor (chair endowed for teaching excellence), 2006-12 Full Professor, 2003-- Assistant Professor, 2000-- Research Fellow in English Literature, Girton College, Cambridge, 1997-2000 EDUCATION: 1998 Ph.D. in Comparative Literature, Yale University. 1991 A.B. in Literature summa cum laude, Harvard University. GRANTS & PRIZES: 2017-18 NEH Public Scholar Fellowship. 2015, 2017 Elson Art-Making Grant, Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences. 2014 Robert Lowry Patten Prize for best book in 18th- or 19th-century British studies. 2013-14 Guggenheim Fellowship. 2013 Walter Channing Cabot Prize. 2013 Honorable mention, James Russell Lowell Prize for best book of literary criticism. 2010 Fellow, Columbia University Institute for Scholars (Paris). 2006-7 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship. 2006-7 Walter Jackson Bate Fellowship, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. 2002-3 Stanford Humanities Center Fellowship. 2000-02 Career Development Award (Harvard). 2000-3, 5-6, 8-10 Clarke-Cooke grant for research in the humanities (Harvard). 1994-97 Sterling Prize Fellowship (Yale). 1995-96 Andrew W. Mellon Dissertation Fellowship. 1995 Beinecke Library Fellowship. 1992-94 Mellon Fellowship in the Humanities. 1991-92 Bourse de recherches (Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, Paris). 113 1991-92 Augustus Clifford Tower Fellowship (Ecole Normale Supérieure). 1991 Fulbright Fellowship to Universidad de Buenos Aires (declined).
    [Show full text]
  • BIOL 1406 Darwin's Dangerous Idea
    BIOL 1406 Darwin’s Dangerous Idea - Video Exam I Essay Question: (Matching Format) Describe the history of the scientific theory, biological evolution by means of natural selection: and focus on the life of Charles Darwin as portrayed in the PBS production, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Be sure to describe the roles of the following: "Raz", Robert FitzRoy, Emma Darwin, Annie Darwin, Richard Owen, Charles Lyell, Thomas Malthus, Samuel Wilberforce, and Thomas Huxley.) 1.Describe Captain Fitzroy’s perspective when it comes to “free-thinking” 2. What does Fitzroy allow Darwin to borrow? 3. Who was “Raz”? 4. Who was Richard Owen? 5. What was Owen’s view on “free-thinking” with regard to human ancestory? 6. What was Owen so afraid of? 7. Who was Emma (Wedgewood) Darwin? How did she influence Charles Darwin with regard to his scientific inquiry ? 8. What type of disease do we now speculate that Darwin may have suffered from? How did he get the disease? 9. Who was Annie Darwin? 10. When Annie left, what affect did this have on Darwin? 11. Who was Charles Lyell? What role did he play in influencing Darwin? 12. Who was Thomas Malthus? What did he do to influence Darwin? 13. What did Richard Owen do that was scientifically unethical? Why did he do this? 14. Who was Samuel Wilberforce? 15. Who was Thomas Henry Huxley? What did he do to influence Darwin? 16. Who was Alfred Russel Wallace? What did he do to influence Darwin? 17. What motivated Darwin to study so many different organisms; i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyell Lectures –
    http://www.ucalgary.ca/hic • ISSN 1492-7810 2006 • Vol. 6, No. 1 McKitterick, David. Print, Manuscript and the Search for Order, 1450-1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xv + 311; illus. CDN$60.00 (cloth). ISBN: 052182690X. Reviewed by Adrian Johns, University of Chicago David McKitterick, librarian at Trinity College, Cambridge, is one of the English‐speaking world’s leading historical bibliographers. Print, Manuscript and the Search for Order is based on his Lyell Lectures in Bibliography which he presented at Oxford in mid‐2000. It is a worthy contribution to a growing revisionist literature devoted to the history of print in the era between Gutenberg and full‐ scale industrialization. McKitterick’s target in this book is a notion of Gutenberg’s “printing revolution” that is widely shared, apparently intuitive, and hard to dislodge. It is the notion formalized in Elizabeth Eisenstein’s The Printing Press as an Agent of Change.1 Appearing in two volumes in 1979, Eisenstein’s work aimed to provide a survey of the effects of Gutenberg’s invention on high European culture — and hence, in effect, to explain its role in forging modernity itself. It succeeded remarkably well. From the premise that the press allowed people for the first time to produce documents that were substantially identical in huge quantities and at cheap prices, Eisenstein proceeded to argue that this elemental power fomented radical transformations in every field of life from religious experience to the technical sciences. It has become one of the most influential arguments in the history of intellectual culture in the last generation.
    [Show full text]