Programme Elements of Swedish Nuclear Waste Management – Implementing with What Results?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ENERGETIKA. 2014. T. 60. Nr. 1. P. 54–68 © Lietuvos mokslų akademija, 2014 Programme elements of Swedish nuclear waste management – implementing with what results? Ulf Roßegger In the controversy over a safe and permanent disposal of nuclear waste, numerous solutions have been put forward. While from a scientific point of view answers are Chair in Public Law and inconclusive, the option of geological disposal seems to be the most common approach Administrative Sciences, in several European countries, i. e. in Sweden. Technical University Firstly, the objective of this article is to present the organisation of nuclear of Braunschweig, waste management (NWM) in Sweden. The particular focus shall be put on the im Bienroder Weg 87, plementation of the respective national policy. Furthermore, it will be shown what D-38106 Braunschweig, kind of responsible agencies were established. The article aims at analysing the adopted Germany strategy and process as well as showing the difficulties inherent to finding a site which E-mail: [email protected] is both appropriate and meets technical issues, political and public acceptance. After a short outline of the historical development the article attempts to identify special national phases in the development of the nuclear waste management. It then illustrates how the Swedish national concept for the direct geological disposal of domestic nuclear fuel has been implemented and which policy regimes have been introduced. In addition to that, the present situation or stage of implementing will be analysed. Key words: Nuclear Waste Management, highlevel waste, Sweden CURRENT SITUATION plementation. Furthermore, it is debatable to what extent the principle of countervailing influence – topdownprocess Several European countries with nuclear power favour the versus bottomupprocess – is an explaining factor. An in option of geological disposal as the best option [1]. A high tegration of various stages and actors could be understood potential for conflicts arises on how to find a site and siting as a driver and simultaneously as a catalyser for the whole strategies that are politically and publicly acceptable. For a process. The research of implementation has shifted its long time Sweden has seemed to implement its policy for con tents from the consideration of effectiveness to the im nuclear waste management successfully. The article shows portance of implementation for policy legitimation. how the Swedish nuclear waste management (NWM) pro With regard to NWM the governmental and admi nis cess is running uptodate. trative action has to produce an outcome. Nevertheless, All over the world countries are meeting problems when functionality resists as a central feature to assure quality nuclear waste management policies were implemented. management and to supervise the accomplishment of du The main hypothesis of the article is that technical and ties and responsibilities. The role of referring to scientific society conflicts are often settled within the phase of im findings and the extent of private enterprises actions in this Programme elements of Swedish nuclear waste management – implementing with what results? 55 process have been analysed. An adaptation is easier when a statute to structure implementation and (2) nonstatutory formulated policy is put into practice than to handle with variables affecting implementation. negotiations and substantial changes [2]. As defined by Sabatier and Mazmanian [4], the most In general, a strategy has to be consistent to pave the important conditions of effective implementation are the way for locating the final disposal for spent nuclear fuel. following: Due to this argument some key elements have to be taken • The programme is based on sound theory. into account: (a) scientific paradigm, (b) environmental • The statute contains clear policy directives. and economical costbenefitanalyses, (c) the political • Leaders possess substantial managerial and political (and) popular dimension of environmental protection, and skill. (d) public participation in environmental decision making. • The programme is actively supported by constituent An integrated approach considers the technical side of the groups. problem to dispose nuclear waste, the societal and political • Relative priority of statutory objectives is not un dimension as well as the legal basis and other framework dermined. requirements [3]. For handling an issue there is the importance and tractability of a problem and additionally how actors are RESEArcH IMPLEMENTATION dealing with it. To structure an implementation the fol low ing items have to be taken into account: (1) coherent The methodology is based on the approach of research ob jectives are existing, (2) incorporation of a useful and imp lementation and the question is about possible causes causal theory, (3) availability of financial resources, (4) hi for discrepancy between the norm (action programme) er archical integration orientated on institutions, (5) exis t and reality (impact), when programme implementation is ence of decisionrules of implementing agencies, (6) iden forced by orders, other rules or current findings and how an tification or recruitment of implementing offi cials and operational process will be organized as a definitive factor. (7) granting formal access by outsiders. A further side effect is to evaluate success or fail elements These aspects will have an impact on the success of of the process. The aim is to come to general evidence on programme implementation. Nevertheless, “difficulties” terms and conditions exercised at political stage [4]. exist in measuring changes in the seriousness of the The structure and useful tool of an implementation pro issue. cess can be seen below in Fig. 1. First, there is the tractabil The interaction between the technical and the societal ity of the problem (here: disposal of spent nuclear fuel). context is therefore a basic assumption when nuclear waste This content will bring about two variables: (1) the ability of management processes will be implemented. Fig. 1. Skeletal Flow Diagram of the Variables involved in the Implementation Process [4] 56 Ulf Roßegger Fig. 2. Radioactive waste governance in the (geo-)technical and socio-cultural context [3] HISTORICAL AsPECTS OF SWEDISH The Swedish society has high trust in the nuclear NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT industry because it appears to the public that Swedish nuclear power plants operators have a solution to the nuclear In Sweden, the operators have the responsibility of dispose waste disposal problem [6]. In 1977, SKB has installed one and final disposal of nuclear waste. By following the Swe of the first major international projects on nuclear waste dish parliamentary decision these operators have found a disposal in underground laboratories at former mine Stripa joint associate company named SKB (Svensk Kärn brän (Bergsladen, located north of Mälaren Lake in northern slehantering AB equal to Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Svealand). These research activities ended in 1992. Management Company) in 1972. Their responsibility is Already in 1983 the SKB has published a report named also about transporting nuclear waste and interim storage. “KBS3” as a concept of encapsulation of the spent fuel Traditionally there is a longstanding association be inside of a natural rock formation. Furthermore, it is pro tween the management of spent nuclear fuel in Sweden tected by additional engineering barriers like Bentonite and the industryled SKB research, development and rings. demonstration project [5]. For the reason of the success In the 1990s the laboratory for reposition technology has of the KBS (kärnbränslesäkerhet, in English: nuclear fuel moved to Oskarshamn at a depth of 460 meters – research safety) project it led to a government affirmation to obsess work has been set up from 1990 to 1995. For the final the KBS concept. The introduction of a new legislation, disposal site finding the SKB has promised to operate a the Nuclear Power Stipulation Act, has been adopted in process between 5 and 10 studies in various municipalities, February 1977 putting pressure on the reactor owners. The when the first feasibility study has started in 1992. Firstly, Act assessed that they must show exactly how and where all 286 municipalities have been invited, while the result spent fuel can be disposed in an absolute safety manner. It has ended in two positive responses. After that SKB has was linked to the permission that can be granted to fuel any decided to approach the five municipalities already hosting other reactor [7]. An important change was made when the nuclear facilities [7]. In the period from 1993 to 2000 the Stipulation Act (Villkorslagen) has been replaced by the SKB has made eight feasibility studies. The two local sites Act on Nuclear Activities in 1984. In addition, the wording Storuman und Malå (both with no practical experience “absolute” safety was transferred to the reconfirmation with nuclear technology) withdrawal in this process was that reactor owners were to be held responsible for a “com caused by negative municipal referendums. Five out of six prehensive research and development programme” guar local sites – Östhammar, Nyköping, Tierp, Oskarshamn, anteeing the safe handling, interim storage and domestic Hultsfred and Älvkarleby – seemed to be appropriate for a geological disposal [6]. final disposal site. Due to the Swedish Environmental Code, Nearly 30 years the whole process is focussed