DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Space Strategy 2021-2026

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Space Strategy 2021-2026 OPEN SPACE STRATEGY 2021-2026 DRAFT Background Report FOR COMMUNITY CONSULTATION JULY 2020 Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Project Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Areas with Potential Higher Demand ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3 Open space provision ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Open Space Category .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Open Space Hierarchy ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.3 Relationship between Category and Hierarchy ............................................................................................................................................................................ 23 4 Open Space Provision and Distribution ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 4.1 Provision of Open Space per Population ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Distribution of Open Space .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 5 Walkable Neighbourhoods .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 6 Our changing urban form ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 7 Urban Heat Islands................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 8 Identifying priority areas ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 52 9 Tree canopy .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 53 10 Managing Stormwater ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 10.1 Current stormwater management on open space ........................................................................................................................................................................ 57 10.2 Review of recent developments ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 11 Sporting Open Space ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 11.1 Sporting Open Space Provision Benchmarking ........................................................................................................................................................................... 66 11.2 Sports Participation Data and Trends .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 66 11.3 Local knowledge of Demand for Sporting Open Space ............................................................................................................................................................... 69 11.4 Other considerations .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 DRAFT Open Space Strategy – Background Report 2 12 Appropriate planning processes ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 14 Open Space Framework .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 14.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 14.1.1 Definitions: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 74 14.1.2 Open Space Framework Structure ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 75 14.2 Open Space Category .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 76 14.3 Open Space Hierarchy ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 77 14.4 Relationship between Category and Hierarchy ............................................................................................................................................................................ 78 15 Open Space Provision and Development Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................................... 79 15.1 Sporting Open Space Guidelines ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 80 15.2 Golf Course Guidelines ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 91 15.3 Recreation Parks Guidelines ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 93 15.4 Natural Areas Guidelines ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 108 15.5 Linear Open Space Guidelines .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 111 15.6 Coastal Foreshore Guidelines .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 117 15.7 Streetscape Guidelines .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 122 15.8 Encumbered Land Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mclaren's Wharf
    sephamore road Existing rail reserve - no trains existing rail line heart street existing freight line victoria road causeway road potential tram line port river express way sephamore road Existing rail reserve - no trains existing rail line heart street existing freight line commercial road victoria road current situation - transport network current situation - Site current situation - primary road network causeway road current situation current situation current situation port river port river port river potential tram line port river express way existing rail network mclaren warf and cruickshanks corner existing primary road network project boundary potential tram route sephamore road newport future Existing rail reserve - no trains development precinct existing rail line birkenhead bridge newport future (vehicles) port river expressway heart street commercial road development precinct existing freight line newport quays stage 2 newport future jervois bridge (vehicles) train crossing (marina cove) developmentvictoria precinct road (vehicles) newport quays stage 1 (edgewater) current situation - transport network current situation - Site current situation - primary road network newport future development precinct (hart’s mill precinct) current situation potential pedestrian crossing causeway road (none present currently) current situation current situation port river port river port river potential tramexisting line rail network mclaren warf and cruickshanks corner existing primary road network port river express way potential tram
    [Show full text]
  • City of Port Adelaide Enfield Heritage Review
    CITY OF PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD HERITAGE REVIEW MARCH 2014 McDougall & Vines Conservation and Heritage Consultants 27 Sydenham Road, Norwood, South Australia 5067 Ph (08) 8362 6399 Fax (08) 8363 0121 Email: [email protected] PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD HERITAGE REVIEW CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Objectives of Review 1.2 Stage 1 & 2 Outcomes 2.0 NARRATIVE THEMATIC HISTORY - THEMES & SUB-THEMES 3 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Chronological History of Land Division and Settlement Patterns 2.2.1 Introduction 2.2.2 Land Use to 1850 - the Old and New Ports 2.2.3 1851-1870 - Farms and Villages 2.2.4 1870-1885 - Consolidation of Settlement 2.2.5 1885-1914 - Continuing Land Division 2.2.6 1915-1927 - War and Town Planning 2.2.7 1928-1945 - Depression and Industrialisation 2.2.8 1946-1979 - Post War Development 2.3 Historic Themes 18 Theme 1: Creating Port Adelaide Enfield's Physical Environment and Context T1.1 Natural Environment T1.2 Settlement Patterns Theme 2: Governing Port Adelaide Enfield T2.1 Levels of Government T2.2 Port Governance T2.3 Law and Order T2.4 Defence T2.5 Fire Protection T2.6 Utilities Theme 3: Establishing Port Adelaide Enfield's State-Based Institutions Theme 4: Living in Port Adelaide Enfield T4.1 Housing the Community T4.2 Development of Domestic Architecture in Port Adelaide Enfield Theme 5: Building Port Adelaide Enfield's Commercial Base 33 T5.1 Port Activities T5.2 Retail Facilities T5.3 Financial Services T5.4 Hotels T5.5 Other Commercial Enterprises Theme 6: Developing Port Adelaide Enfield's Agricultural
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Values Count?
    WHOSE VALUES COUNT? CLASS, PLACE AND HERITAGE DURING WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PORT ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA Adam Paterson This thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide January 2015 Abstract In Australia there has been little critical reflection on the role that class plays during negotiations over cultural heritage. This stands in contrast to the United Kingdom and the United States, where research aiming to develop a better understanding of how class shapes cultural heritage practice is more common. Key research themes in these countries include identifying how working-class people participate in cultural heritage activities; determining what barriers exist to their participation and what social purpose cultural heritage has within post-industrial communities; and understanding how cultural heritage is used in negotiations over the classed meanings of place during gentrification. This thesis explores the relationships between class, place and heritage in Port Adelaide, South Australia. Once a prosperous industrial and commercial port, since the 1980s Port Adelaide has undergone slow social and economic change. In 2002, the State Government announced plans for major re-development of surplus waterfront land in order to generate profit and economic stimulation for the Port through extensive and rapid development, radically transforming Port Adelaide physically and socially. Drawing on a theoretical framework that
    [Show full text]
  • Walk20the20port202013.Pdf
    rive Road Commercial and Street Nile of corner on Sign astal D ic Co Scen Tel: 8405 6560 or Email: [email protected] Email: or 6560 8405 Tel: on Centre Information Visitor Adelaide Port the contact - essential Bookings 16 permitting) (weather 17 Thursday & Sunday every 2pm at Offered Port Walks - let a local be your guide your be local a let - Walks Port 15 Walks Guided 20 19 13 21 18 www.environment.sa.gov.au/heritage Website: 8 Australia South of Areas Heritage State 14 Wauwa st Dept for Environment, Water and Natural Resources Natural and Water Environment, for Dept 7 23 27 24 22 25 6 9 exhibition permanent Adelaide Port of History 12 day) Christmas (closed 5pm to 10am from Daily Open: 42 26 11 32 5 10 28 1 Adelaide Port 4 Street Lipson 126 31 3 34 33 South Australian Maritime Museum Maritime Australian South 2 41 29 30 2-5pm 39 Friday 2-5pm 35 Thursday 10am-1pm Wednesday rive 40 Coastal D 36 Researchers for Open Scenic 6580 8405 Tel: Port Adelaide Port Street Church 2 Library Adelaide Port 38 Room History Local Port Adelaide visit: Adelaide Port historic about more out find To 37 Adelaide Port Historic Map Legend Port Adelaide Port Adelaide Walk The Port Port Adelaide is a sea port city with a How to get there… Heritage Walking Tour of Port Adelaide unique, salty tang to its environs. 1 Port Adelaide Visitor Information Centre, ◆ 15 Dockside Tavern, c1898 29 Nile Street Power Station - 1860 Footpath Plaque It is the historic maritime heart of South Australia and home to some of the finest 16 SS Admella Memorial - The Navigator historic buildings in the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Ships and Boats Strategy
    Prepared by Mulloway Studio for Renewal SA RESA04 _ FINAL PORT ADELAIDE RENEWAL PROJECT Historic ships a n d boats strategy R e p o r t Table of contents Section Page 1 01.00 Introduction 01.01 Approach and Methodology Page 3 02.00 Stakeholders Page 6 03.00 Ships and boats 03.00 Current ships location 03.01 One And All.Mission Statement 03.02 One And All 03.03 Falie.Mission Statement 03.04 Falie 03.05 City of Adelaide Clipper Ship.V ision 03.06 City of Adelaide Clipper Ship 03.07 Fearless.A rchie Badenoch.Y elta.N elcebee Mission Statement 03.08 Yelta 03.09 Archie Badenoch 03.10 Fearless 03.11 Nelcebee RESA04 _ FINAL Table of contents Section Page 19 04.00 Site Analysis 04.01 Pe destrian access 04.02 Vehicle access 04.03 Zone activity 04.04 View 04.05 Site summary 04.06 Fletcher’s Slip 04.07 Shed 26 04.08 Hart’s Mill 04.09 Cruickshank’s Corner 04.10 Dock 2 Page 30 05.00 General Guiding Principles 05.01 Siting Opportunities and Recommendations 05.02 Option: Location 05.03 Option: City of Adelaide 05.04 Option: South Australian Maritime Museum 05.05 Option: Combined 05.06 Conclusion 05.07 Cost: Notes Page 49 06.00 Implementation Page 53 07.00 Appendices 07.00 Appendix A.City of Adelaide Clipper Ship 07.01 Appendix B.SAMM RESA04 _ FINAL Document control Issue Issue date Revision notes Draft 01 15th November 2016 ships and boats strategy _ draft 1 _ 15 November 2016 _ RM comments.pdf Draft 02 23r d November 2016 ships and boats strategy _ draft 2 _ 23 november 2016 _ track changes.pdf Draft 03 28th November 2016 Draft 04 9th December 2016 Draft 05 14th December 2016 Draft 06 02nd March 2017 Draft 07 14th March 2017 Final 15th March 2017 RESA04 _ FINAL Port Adelaide Renewal Project Introduction 1 01.00 Introduction As part of the Port Renewal Project, Mulloway Studio was engaged by the Urban Renewal Authority (Renewal SA) to undertake a strategy for berthing or locating historic ships and vessels within the inner harbour of Port Adelaide.
    [Show full text]
  • Would It Be Too Much to Ask of the Namers, That Any District Having Already a Suitable Native Name Should Be Allowed to Keep It…? (Register, 3 August 1868, Page 3C)
    G Would it be too much to ask of the namers, that any district having already a suitable native name should be allowed to keep it…? (Register, 3 August 1868, page 3c) Gairdner, Lake - Discovered by Stephen Hack and, simultaneously, by P. E. Warburton and Samuel Davenport in August 1857, it was named by Governor MacDonnell in October 1857 after Gordon Gairdner, CMG, Chief Clerk of the Australian Department in the Colonial Office: [His] long and faithful service in the Australian Department of the Colonial Service entitles him to such tribute of remembrance from here. In a despatch to the colonial office the Governor said that ‘its size and remarkable cliffs projecting into a vast expanse of dazzling salt, here and there studded with islands, render it one of the most striking objects hitherto met with in Australian scenery…’ In 1858, it was reported that it was ‘very strange that successive explorers see the same country with impressions so irreconcilable’: We are quite aware of the immense difference of appearance which a tract of land will exhibit at different seasons of the year. But an Australian explorer should be able at any time to affirm, with tolerable certainty, what aspect a country will present at all other times… The tract of country described by Mr Hack as comprising four or five thousand square miles of excellent pastoral land, Major Warburton calculates will sustain sheep at the rate of about one to the square mile. We cannot presume to say which is the more accurate estimate… Galga - The town, in the Hundred of Bandon, 32 km South-East of Swan Reach, was proclaimed on 10 February 1916 and is an Aboriginal word meaning ‘hungry’; it was intended by the railway commissioner, who named it, that the railway station would be a place where refreshments be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Adelaide Enfield Council Residential Code Maps (4.6 MB PDF)
    3 V IC T O R I A R D L A D Y G O 6 W R I E D 5 R 7 8 Y W D H R Y 11 Y R R U A T 12 B I S L I I L M A 16 S PORT RIVER EXP 22 19 20 21 23 24 D S R O D U R N T O H L L S R I N D H A C H 30 32 R U 29 31 H C 33 P O R T R D 38 39 Development Plan boundary Main road 0 1 km Minor road © DPLG, 2009 PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD COUNCIL SPAR ID: 3243 Index to Residential Code - Map PAdE/2A D R E Y G W D ID H R R Y B R D U L B E S I I F L A E S K A D R W H T T R R O O N P IN A M MONTAGUE RD TH OR N D A O 16 R L IL H C D R U R H S C Y E L K L A D W VAN R CA 23 28 24 26 27 25 H A M P S T E A D R D D D R R L T L I 32 C H E P C R S U O D R R H T C P AS E H F T O R O S N T 35 E 36 R 33 34 S R D 37 38 39 41 40 O G R D D R N R U B N Y L G Development Plan boundary Main road 0 2.5 km Minor road © DPLG, 2009 PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD COUNCIL SPAR ID: 3243 Index to Residential Code - Map PAdE/2B PR IVA TE RD OUTER HARBOR RD ES W O O' L MA LL EY RD O U T ER HA RB D O R UR B N O A A L T H R G A O M C P A C C S D R S R E G VI O CT R OR R IA E RD IV L O O RO NS AY NORTH HAVEN DR LA DY H R IMA UT LAY HV A D EN R DR UR CAR A E L LIA SON R DR D Determined Area for the Purposes of Schedule 4 – Complying development, Clause 2B – New Dwellings Cadastre 0 0.4 km Development Plan boundary © DPLG, 2009 Residential Code Map PAdE/3 SPAR ID: 3242 PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD COUNCIL VI CT OR IA R OUTER HARBOR D HI MAL AYA NORTH HAVEN DR UREL CA L A I R R AD A D LSO Y R N D DR RU E TH N VE O N D S IA R R L D LA O A NC U R G A T T STE H S R R DR U E A B G N I L K FL AM IN IA ST RD A LEX R SIR
    [Show full text]
  • The Port River Symphonic of Chester Schultz
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Online @ ECU Edith Cowan University Research Online ECU Publications Post 2013 1-1-2014 Toward A New, Musical Paradigm of Place: The Port River Symphonic Of Chester Schultz Robin Ryan Edith Cowan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013 Part of the Music Commons 10.1215/22011919-3614926 This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of: Ryan, R. (2014). Toward a New, Musical Paradigm of Place: The Port River Symphonic of Chester Schultz. Environmental Humanities , 4(1), 41-67. Available here This Journal Article is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/670 Environmental Humanities, vol. 4, 2014, pp. 41-67 www.environmentalhumanities.org ISSN: 2201-1919 Toward a New, Musical Paradigm of Place: The Port River Symphonic of Chester Schultz Robin Ryan Western Australian Academy of Performing Arts, Edith Cowan University, Australia ABSTRACT In privileging music as a focus for applied ecology, the goal of this essay is to deepen perspectives on the musical representation of land in an age of complex environmental challenge. As the metaphor driving public narration of environmental crises, the notion of Earth as our home—signified by the prefix “eco”—brings with it a critical expectation for the musical academy to retreat from bland talk about a “sense of place.” Based on the premise that damaged ecologies are a matter of concern to many people, Indigenous and Settler; and building on the late Val Plumwood’s theory of “shadow” or “denied” places (Plumwood, 2008), the author introduces Within Our Reach: A Symphony of the Port River Soundscapes by anti-elitist South Australian composer Chester Schultz (b.
    [Show full text]
  • Mclaren Wharf and Cruickshank's Corner Master Plan Report
    PORT ADELAIDE MCLAREN WHARF & CRUICKSHANK’S CORNER PRECINCTS MASTER PLAN FRAMEWORK 1 2 Figure 1 – Port Adelaide lighthouse and Fishermen’s Wharf Markets Contents Contents Figures Figure 1 – Port Adelaide lighthouse and Fishermen’s Wharf Markets 2 1 Executive Summary 5 Figure 2 – Customs House on Commercial Road 4 Figure 3 – Master Plan Study Area 5 2 Parameters and Vision 6 Figure 4 – McLaren Wharf and Cruickshank’s Corner Precincts Master Plan Framework Parameters 6 3 Methodology and Approach 7 Figure 5 – The master planning process flow diagram 7 Figure 6 – Regional Context - Port Adelaide in context of Adelaide region 11 4 Placemaking and Consultation 8 Figure 7 – Local Context - Site in context of City of Port Adelaide and Enfield 11 Figure 8 – Precincts, Site Audit 11 5 Strategic Context 10 Figure 9 – Land Uses - Concepts, Port Adelaide Enfield Council Development Plan 11 Figure 10 – Transport - Existing and future transport connections 13 6 Design Framework Benchmarking 14 Figure 11 – Community Facilities - Existing and future community facilities 13 Figure 12 – McLaren Wharf and Cruickshank’s Corner Precincts 7 Design Framework 16 Master Plan Framework 33 Opportunities and Constraints Figure 13 – McLaren Wharf Precinct Master Plan Framework 34 Figure 14 – Improving local public and pedestrian spaces and places 36 8 Master Plan Framework 31 Figure 15 – Regenerating the waterfront 36 Figure 16 – Commercial Road renewal 36 Figure 17 – Connecting people within the centre 37 Figure 18 – McLaren Wharf consolidated development and renewal
    [Show full text]
  • Local Area Bicycle Plan 2015-2020
    PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK The City of Port Adelaide Enfield Local Area Bicycle Plan 2015 – 2020 InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd 2015. The information contained in this document produced by InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client for the purposes for which it has been prepared and InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd undertakes no duty or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely on this document. All rights reserved. No sections or elements of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd. Because of the statistical nature of this report, care should be taken in interpreting the data presented throughout. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information included in this report, InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd and its contractors make no representations, either express or implied, that the information is accurate or fit for any purpose and expressly disclaims all liability for loss or damage arising from reliance upon the information in this report. Kerry McConnell Team Leader, Transport City of Port Adelaide Enfield City of Port Adelaide 163 St Vincent Street, Enfield Port Adelaide SA 5015 p: +61 8 8405 6887 m: +61 447 819 964 e: [email protected] Gayle Buckby Benjamin Russ Senior Movement Planner Associate InfraPlan (Aust) P/L InfraPlan (Aust) P/L Consultant Adelaide Adelaide Level 1, 22-26 Vardon Avenue, Level 1, 22-26 Vardon Avenue, Adelaide SA 5000 Adelaide SA 5000 p: +61 8 8227 0372 p: +61 8 8227 0372 e: [email protected] e: [email protected] Last saved 25/11/2015 1:55:22 PM Authored by Gayle Buckby, Brad McCormack and Benjamin Russ Reviewed by Benjamin Russ i | P a g e The City of Port Adelaide Enfield Local Area Bicycle Plan 2015 – 2020 InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge the Kaurna people, the original custodians of the Adelaide Plains, the land upon which this Local Area Bicycle Plan is set.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item: 3.4
    14 August 2014 AGENDA ITEM 3.4 Officer: Damian Dawson Statutory Planning Branch – Planning Division Department of Planning, Transport & Infrastructure TABLE OF CONTENTS PLANNING REPORT PAGES AGENDA REPORT 2-11 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROVISIONS 12-28 ATTACHMENTS LOCALITY MAP & SITE PHOTOS 28-34 ZONE MAPS AND CONCEPT PLAN 35-45 APPLICATION DOCUMENTS & PLANS 46-143 AGENCY REPORTS 144-149 COUNCIL COMMENTS 150-152 REPRESENTATION 153 Page | 1 14 August 2014 AGENDA ITEM: 3.4 Application No: 040/0952/13 KNET Reference: 8784282 Applicant: Fishermans Wharf Markets Pty Ltd Proposal: Construction of a five level building for tourist accommodation Subject Land: Lot 106 in DP 50895 Nelson Street, Port Adelaide Relevant Authority: DAC Role of the Commission: Schedule 10 – 5. Port Centre Zone Zone / Policy Area: Regional Centre Zone – McLaren’s Wharf Policy Area 44 Categorisation: Merit Notification: Category 2 Representations: One in favour of the proposal Lodgement Date: 8 May, 2013 Council: Port Adelaide Enfield Council Development Plan: Port Adelaide Enfield Council – 15 November 2012 Referral Agencies: State Heritage Unit – DEWNR, Coast Protection Board, Transport Services - DPTI Officers Report: Damian Dawson Recommendation: Refusal PLANNING REPORT 1. PROPOSAL The applicant seeks to construct a five level tourist accommodation facility upon the current open lot car park adjacent the Fisherman’s Wharf Markets in Port Adelaide. The proposed facility will consist of: 61 serviced apartments 43 car parks within a reconfiguration of the existing open lot car park Reception, foyer and managers office on the ground floor adjacent the entrance of the building Conference room and outdoor deck/BBQ area Guest’s Gym A range of external materials and finishes including concrete block, painted render, aluminium sunshades, colorbond roofing and aluminium window frames The proposed building will have a maximum height of 16.7 metres to the roof parapet.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Adelaide Centre Vision and Framework
    HASSELL port adelaide vision+ client Government of South Australia City of Port Adelaide Enfield Project Steering Committee Warwick Stuart Land Management Corporation Andre Stuyt Land Management Corporation Rosa Gagetti City of Port Adelaide Enfield Tony Kamenjarin City of Port Adelaide Enfield Chris Hannaford PlanningSA Paul Stark PlanningSA acknowledgements Consultant Team Project Manager Daniel Bennett, HASSELL Project Director Brenton Burman, HASSELL Expert Team Jan Gehl, Professor, Dr. litt, GEHL Architects Ken Maher, Chairman, HASSELL Mike Cullen, Patrick Partners Pty Ltd Specialist Team Natalie Fuller & Associates McIntyre Robertson Scarborough Pty Ltd Murray Young & Associates SASH Consulting Services Pty Ltd HASSELL Limited 007 711 435 70 Hindmarsh Square Adelaide SA 5000 Australia p 61 8 8203 5222 f 61 8 8203 5200 e [email protected] w www.hassell.com.au Contact: Daniel Bennett, Senior Associate Copyright: July 2006 Photograph Credits Daniel Bennett 2005/2006 HASSELL port adelaide centre vision+ framework a vision & urban design framework for the port adelaide centre HASSELL vision portadelaide2030 Port Adelaide was South Australia’s first commercial Port. It is now a vibrant and creative community that has secured a sustainable future based on a vision that celebrates its history as well as embracing new ideas, innovation and development. The heritage of Port Adelaide is valued in its revitalisation focusing on active mainstreets, waterfront promenades and the Port River. Port Adelaide is an easily accessible regional centre within metropolitan Adelaide, offering lively cafes, shops and pubs together with residential, commercial, tourism, cultural and leisure activities providing rich and rewarding experiences. New investment in commercial enterprise and residential activity provide an attractive opportunity to live, work and play in a unique environment.
    [Show full text]