Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study City of Port Adelaide Enfield O C E A N I C S A U S T R A L I A Volume 1 – Final Report Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study Principal Contacts Drew Jacobi (Tonkin Consulting) Bill Syme (WBM Oceanics Australia) October 2005 Ref No 20020477RA3D O C E A N I C S A U S T R A L I A Table of Contents Table of Contents City of Port Adelaide Enfield Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study Final Report VOLUME 1 – FINAL REPORT 1. Introduction 1 2. Land Subsidence 2 2.1 Background 2 2.2 Causes of Land Subsidence 3 2.3 Measurement of Land Subsidence 4 2.3.1 E&WS Survey Mark Re-levelling 4 2.3.2 Deep Bench Mark Survey 6 2.4 Future Changes to Land Subsidence Rates 6 2.4.1 Changes in Groundwater Use 6 2.4.2 Land Reclamation 7 2.5 Recommendations 7 2.5.1 Adoption of Land Subsidence Rates for this Study 7 2.5.2 Further Work 8 3. Tide Analysis 9 3.1 Storm Tide Analysis Summary 9 3.1.1 Overview 9 3.1.2 Tide Datums 9 3.1.3 Storm Height and Duration Analysis 10 3.1.4 Storm Tide Hydrograph Synthesis 11 3.1.5 Summary of Highest 25 Events 12 3.1.6 Basic Equations 14 3.2 Relationship between storm surges and rainfall events 14 4. Seawater Inundation and Protection 17 4.1 Introduction 17 4.2 Seawater Hydraulic Modelling 18 4.2.1 Data Collation and Review 18 4.2.2 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Development 18 4.2.3 Hydraulic Model 19 4.3 Seawater Model Calibration 20 4.3.1 Selection of Seawater Calibration Event 20 4.3.2 Calibration to 1999 Event 23 4.4 Preliminary Future Conditions Modelling 26 4.5 Damages Assessment 27 4.6 Structural Condition Assessment 31 4.7 Seawater Flood Protection 31 4.8 Concept Sea Defence Upgrade 31 4.8.1 Background 31 4.8.2 Design Requirements 32 4.8.3 Concept Design 32 4.8.4 Outer Harbour 34 4.8.5 Estimated Costs 34 City of Port Adelaide Enfield Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study – Final Report 20020477RA3D.doc Revision: D Date: 10/10/05 Page: i O C E A N I C S A U S T R A L I A Table of Contents 5. Local Stormwater Inundation and Protection 36 5.1 Introduction 36 5.2 Seawater – Stormwater Interaction Methodology 36 5.3 TUFLOW Model 37 5.4 ILSAX Model 38 5.5 Design ‘Average’ Tide Cycle 39 5.6 100 year ARI Tide Cycle 39 5.7 Stormwater Drainage Performance Measurement 40 5.8 Stormwater Drainage Performance Requirements 40 5.9 Possible Future Increases to Rainfall Intensities and Impacts 41 5.9.1 Literature Review 41 5.9.2 Rainfall Intensity Changes Adopted for this Study 42 5.10 Anthony Street Catchment 42 5.10.1 Existing System 42 5.10.2 Proposed Upgrade Works 43 5.11 Centre Street and Jetty Road Catchments 43 5.11.1 Existing System 43 5.11.2 Proposed Upgrade Works 44 5.12 Hamilton Avenue Catchment 44 5.12.1 Existing System 44 5.12.2 Proposed Upgrade Works 44 5.13 Osborne Catchment 45 5.13.1 Existing System 45 5.13.2 Proposed Upgrade Works 45 5.14 Port Adelaide Centre Catchment 46 5.14.1 Existing System 46 5.14.2 Proposed Upgrade Works 46 5.15 Semaphore Road Catchment 47 5.15.1 Existing System 47 5.15.2 Proposed Upgrade Works 48 5.16 Future Sea Level / Land Subsidence Scenarios 48 5.17 Upgrade Costs 48 5.18 Recommended Future Scenario 49 5.19 Further Work 50 6. Wetlands and Ponding Basins Inundation and Protection 51 6.1 Methodology and Procedure for Wetlands and Ponding Basins Modelling 51 6.1.1 Background 51 6.1.2 Hydraulic Model Development 51 6.1.3 Digital Elevation Model Development 52 6.1.4 Boundary Conditions 52 6.2 Wetlands and Ponding Basins Existing Drainage Systems / Existing Development 52 6.2.1 Barker Inlet Wetlands Management Plan 52 6.2.2 Sea Level Rise / Land Subsidence Combinations 53 6.2.3 Design Wetland Standing Water Level 53 6.2.4 Concept Seawall Alignment 54 6.2.5 Storm Duration 54 6.2.6 Flooding Scenarios (Sensitivity Tests) 56 6.3 Peak Flood Levels 57 6.4 Further Work 59 7. Summary 60 8. References 62 City of Port Adelaide Enfield Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study – Final Report 20020477RA3D.doc Revision: D Date: 10/10/05 Page: ii O C E A N I C S A U S T R A L I A Table of Contents Tables Table 2-1 Average Land Subsidence relative to Hope Valley Reservoir Bench Mark (Culver, 1970) 4 Table 2-2 Average Land Subsidence (1983-1994) relative to rock pin bench marks at the Tollgate 6 Table 2-3 Discharge from Upper Tertiary Aquifer 6 Table 3-1 Tide Datums 9 Table 3-2 25 Highest Tidal Events 12 Table 3-3 Correlation Between Top 25 Storm Tide and Storm Surge Events 13 Table 3-4 Calculation Variables 14 Table 4-1 Dataset Acquisition and Sources 18 Table 4-2 Land Uses Types 19 Table 4-3 Meteorological Events with 25 Highest Peak Tide Heights 20 Table 4-4 Future Conditions Scenarios of Sea Level Rise and Land Subsidence 26 Table 4-5 Predicted Outer and Inner Harbour Levels 27 Table 4-6 RAM Damages for Large Non Residential Buildings 27 Table 4-7 Building Elevation Adjustments 28 Table 4-8 Building Size Classification 28 Table 4-9 100 year ARI Flood Damage Estimates 29 Table 4-10 Sea Defence System Required Threshold Levels 32 Table 4-11 Concept Sea Defence Upgrade Cost Estimates 34 Table 5-1 100 year ARI tide levels at Stormwater Outfalls 39 Table 5-2 Local Stormwater Drainage Upgrade Cost Estimates 49 Table 6-1 Design Standing Water Levels 53 Table 6-2 Wetland and Ponding Basins Peak Flood Levels 57 Table 6-3 100 Year Ponding Basin Peak Flood Levels Comparison 57 Table 6-4 Maximum Allowable Pond Flood Levels 58 Figures Figure 2-1 Bench Mark Level Changes relative to Hope Valley (Culver, 1970) 5 Figure 3-1 Rainfall versus Tidal Anomaly – Outer Harbour 16 Figure 3-2 Rainfall versus Tidal Anomaly – Outer Harbour 16 Figure 4-1 June 1999 Seawater Calibration Event (Levels to mOHD) 22 Figure 4-2 Preliminary Model Calibration Results 24 Figure 4-3 Revised Model Calibration Results 25 Figure 4-4 Flood Damage Costs (Lower Case) 30 Figure 4-5 Flood Damage Costs (Upper Case) 30 Figure 4-6 Demountable Flood Defence System (Demflood System) 33 Figure 6-1 Magazine Creek Wetland Outlet 100 Year ARI Water Level Comparison 54 Figure 6-2 Range Wetland Outlet 100 Year ARI Water Level Comparison 55 Figure 6-3 Ponding Basin Outlet 100 Year ARI Water Level Comparison 55 Figure 6-4 Barker Inlet Wetland Outlet 100 Year ARI Water Level Comparison 56 Appendices Appendix A Historical Upper Tertiary (T1) Aquifer Potentiometric Surface Levels (Gerges, 1996) Appendix B Storm Tide Analysis Additional Information Appendix C Historical Storm Tide Meteorological Profiles VOLUME 2 – DRAWINGS City of Port Adelaide Enfield Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study – Final Report 20020477RA3D.doc Revision: D Date: 10/10/05 Page: iii O C E A N I C S A U S T R A L I A Document History and Status Document History and Status Rev Description Author Rev’d App’d Date A Issued for review DJ/WJS KSS DJ 29/04/05 B Sec 3.2, 4.5 added DJ/WJS KSS DJ 18/05/05 C Final DJ/WJS KSS DJ 29/07/05 D Revised Ponding Basin Levels DJ/WJS KSS DJ 10/10/05 City of Port Adelaide Enfield Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study – Final Report 20020477RA3D.doc Revision: D Date: 10/10/05 Page: iv O C E A N I C S A U S T R A L I A Introduction 1. Introduction The City of Port Adelaide Enfield together with project partners including the Coast Protection Board, Flinders Ports, Torrens Catchment Water Management Board, Land Management Corporation and Transport SA have commissioned this Study to evaluate seawater and stormwater flood risks in Port Adelaide. Funding for the Study has also been obtained from the Commonwealth Government under the Natural Disasters Risk Management Studies Program. The aim of the Flood Risk Management Study is to identify the risks and develop and implement a strategy to protect the vulnerable areas of the City from the risk of seawater and stormwater flooding taking into account the possible sea level rise and land subsidence over the next hundred years. This Study is intended to be conducted in three phases as follows: Phase 1: Risk Assessment/Preliminary Treatment – Analyse and evaluate risk of seawater and stormwater flooding and identify concept strategies. Phase 2: Risk Treatment Study – Develop detailed strategies, including design and development of management measures and development controls. Phase 3: Treatment Implementation – Implementation of control measures. This report examines Phase 1 of the Flood Risk Management Study. City of Port Adelaide Enfield Port Adelaide Seawater Stormwater Flooding Study – Final Report 20020477RA3D.doc Revision: D Date: 10/10/05 Page: 1 O C E A N I C S A U S T R A L I A Land Subsidence 2. Land Subsidence 2.1 Background Historically land subsidence has been identified as a factor to be taken into account in the analysis of tidal records.
Recommended publications
  • Revised Coastal Management Plan 2017-2022
    Coastal Management Plans (2017-2022) Semaphore, Largs Bay, Taperoo, Osborne and North Haven Dunes 1 City of Port Adelaide Enfield Coastal Management Plans (2017-2022) City of Port Adelaide Enfield 26 September 2017 Version 3 Prepared by EBS Ecology for the City of Port Adelaide Enfield Document Control Revision Date Date issued Authors Reviewed by Revision type No. Reviewed 1 24/08/2017 A. Derry G. Glazier 24/08/2017 Draft1 2 13/09/2017 A. Derry G. Glazier 12/09/2017 Draft2 3 26/09/2017 A. Derry - - Final Distribution of Copies Revision Date issued Media Issued to No. 1 24/08/2017 Electronic Andy Walker, City of Port Adelaide Enfield 2 13/09/2017 Electronic Andy Walker, City of Port Adelaide Enfield 3 26/09/2017 Electronic Andy Walker, City of Port Adelaide Enfield COPYRIGHT: Use or copying of this document in whole or in part (including photographs) without the written permission of EBS Ecology constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of EBS Ecology’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between EBS Ecology and its Client. EBS Ecology accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. CITATION: EBS (2017) Coastal Management Plans (2017-2022). Report to City of Port Adelaide Enfield. EBS Ecology, Adelaide. Coastal Management Plan (2017-2022) – City of Port Adelaide Enfield Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Incident Report - Trip of Torrens Island a and B West 275 Kv Busbars on 12 March 2021
    Preliminary Incident Report - Trip of Torrens Island A and B West 275 kV busbars on 12 March 2021 March 2021 A preliminary operating incident report for the National Electricity Market – information as at 16/03/2021 ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation Term AEMC Australian Energy Market Commission AEMO Australian Energy Market Operator AEST Australian Eastern Standard Time LOR Lack of Reserve NEM National Electricity Market NER National Electricity Rules TNSP Transmission Network Service Provider © AEMO 2021 | Preliminary Incident Report - Trip of Torrens Island A and B West 275 kV busbars on 12 March 2 2021 Important notice PURPOSE AEMO has prepared this preliminary report as part of its review of the reviewable operating incident involving trip of Torrens Island 275 kV West busbar in South Australia on 12 March 2021 as a first step in reporting under clause 4.8.15(c) of the National Electricity Rules. The observations in this report will be updated in AEMO’s final operating incident report, where new information becomes available. DISCLAIMER AEMO has been provided with preliminary data by Registered Participants as to the performance of some equipment leading up to, during and after the event in accordance with clause 4.8.15 of the National Electricity Rules. In addition, AEMO has collated preliminary information from its own systems. Any analysis and conclusions expressed in this document are also of a preliminary nature. While AEMO has made every reasonable effort to ensure the quality of the information in this report, its investigations are incomplete, and any findings expressed in it may change as further information becomes available and further analysis is conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Lefevre Peninsula Transport Corridor Project Brochure
    OUTCOMES KEY ISSUES MEASURES Safety benefits The combination of an increase of rail traffic Reducing the number of rail level crossings (road along the corridor and the frequency of rail level and rail interfaces) along the rail freight route will crossings will increase the risk of potential significantly improve safety for all transport users. ࠜ conflicts between road and rail. Only one of the existing 18 rail level crossings All seven remaining rail level crossings will are actively protected with warning signals, with receive a safety improvement with the installation the remainder protected by regulatory stop or of automatic signals and boom gates. give way signs. The existing Solvay Road and Mersey Road Safety at the Solvay Road and Mersey Road intersection currently provides priority to traffic intersection at the entrance to Penrice will be along Mersey Road. As a consequence, large greatly improved with the installation of give way vehicles accessing Penrice potentially stop up to signs on Mersey Road, giving priority to Solvay three times at the Mersey Road junction, the Road traffic. railway line and Penrice’s security booth. Improved Currently trains are only capable of travelling up An upgrade of the existing seven kilometres of rail transport to 25 kph along the rail corridor due to the track, including the installation of second parallel combination of the poor condition of the existing track, will enable trains to travel up to 60 kph. efficiency track, the frequency of rail level crossings and the As a result, travel times will be significantly potential conflicts with heavy vehicles. reduced, resulting in reduced operating costs and T ࠜ travel time for rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary
    Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary Reference Paper 2: Key habitat features necessary to sustain the dolphin population This document is a companion to the Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary Management Plan and provides background information for the development of the Plan. www.environment.sa.gov.au Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Reference Paper 2: Habitat Table of Contents 1 Scope and purpose .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Methodology ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Sufficient food ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 A functioning ecosystem .................................................................... 2 1.4 Physical safety ...................................................................................... 3 1.5 Interconnectedness ............................................................................ 3 1.6 Cumulative impacts ............................................................................ 3 2 Food supply – Follow the fish ............................................................................ 4 2.1 Bottlenose dolphin diet requirements ............................................... 5 2.1.1 ADS dolphins ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Potential threats to food supply ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes from PAE Council Meetings
    ISSUE 04 | FREE PAE• • today Community Wellbeing | City Plan 2030 | Supporting Local | Have Your Say PAEtoday AUTUMN 2020 “The City of PAE acknowledges and pays respect to the traditional custodians of the land on which we stand, the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains and pays respect to Elders past, present and emerging. We recognise and respect their cultural heritage, beliefs and relationships with the land. We acknowledge that they are of continuing importance to the Kaurna people living today” Mayor Claire Boan elcome to our special Winter following a recent supplementary election. We are now planning for the time when Federal edition of PAE Today. We have a special centre spread feature about and State Government restrictions are lifting, W Who would have thought that our upcoming 2020-2021 Annual Business Plan and new reforms announced. our world would be turned upside down by and Budget, and the City Plan 2030. These two We will lead our recovery and set our future the COVID-19 pandemic and that we would be important strategic plans have been developed direction as a vibrant, resilient and liveable City spending more time at home, at arm’s length to reflect our vision of PAE, a City that values with even stronger community connections. from each other. It has been heartening to see its diverse community, embraces change We want you to tell us what support you now and hear about our wonderful PAE community through innovation, resilience and leadership. require so we can direct these funds to where and I thank you for supporting your families, I encourage you as a PAE resident or business they will make the greatest difference.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014-2015
    SOUTH AUSTRALIA _____________________ THIRTY-FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HISTORY TRUST of SOUTH AUSTRALIA D (History SA) FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015 History SA Directorate Torrens Parade Ground Victoria Drive Adelaide SA 5000 GPO Box 1836 Adelaide SA 5001 DX 464 Adelaide Telephone: +61 8 8203 9888 Facsimile: +61 8 8203 9889 Email: [email protected] Websites: History SA: www.history.sa.gov.au Migration Museum: www.migration.history.sa.gov.au National Motor Museum: www.motor.history.sa.gov.au South Australian Community History: www.community.history.sa.gov.au South Australian Maritime Museum: www.maritime.history.sa.gov.au Adelaidia: www.adelaidia.sa.gov.au About Time: South Australia’s History Festival: www.abouttime.sa.gov.au A World Away: www.southaustraliaswar.com.au Bound for South Australia: www.boundforsouthaustralia.com.au History as it Happens www.historyasithappens.com.au SA History Hub: www.sahistoryhub.com.au This report is prepared by the Directorate of History SA ABN 17 521 345 493 ISSN 1832 8482 ISBN 978 0 646 91029 1 CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ................................................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................................... 2 ROLE AND PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................... 2 VISION ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mclaren's Wharf
    sephamore road Existing rail reserve - no trains existing rail line heart street existing freight line victoria road causeway road potential tram line port river express way sephamore road Existing rail reserve - no trains existing rail line heart street existing freight line commercial road victoria road current situation - transport network current situation - Site current situation - primary road network causeway road current situation current situation current situation port river port river port river potential tram line port river express way existing rail network mclaren warf and cruickshanks corner existing primary road network project boundary potential tram route sephamore road newport future Existing rail reserve - no trains development precinct existing rail line birkenhead bridge newport future (vehicles) port river expressway heart street commercial road development precinct existing freight line newport quays stage 2 newport future jervois bridge (vehicles) train crossing (marina cove) developmentvictoria precinct road (vehicles) newport quays stage 1 (edgewater) current situation - transport network current situation - Site current situation - primary road network newport future development precinct (hart’s mill precinct) current situation potential pedestrian crossing causeway road (none present currently) current situation current situation port river port river port river potential tramexisting line rail network mclaren warf and cruickshanks corner existing primary road network port river express way potential tram
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Marine Biodiversity in South Australia - Part 1 - Background, Status and Review of Approach to Marine Biodiversity Conservation in South Australia
    Conserving Marine Biodiversity in South Australia - Part 1 - Background, Status and Review of Approach to Marine Biodiversity Conservation in South Australia K S Edyvane May 1999 ISBN 0 7308 5237 7 No 38 The recommendations given in this publication are based on the best available information at the time of writing. The South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) makes no warranty of any kind expressed or implied concerning the use of technology mentioned in this publication. © SARDI. This work is copyright. Apart of any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the publisher. SARDI is a group of the Department of Primary Industries and Resources CONTENTS – PART ONE PAGE CONTENTS NUMBER INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction…………………………………..…………………………………………………………1 1.1 The ‘Unique South’ – Southern Australia’s Temperate Marine Biota…………………………….…….1 1.2 1.2 The Status of Marine Protected Areas in Southern Australia………………………………….4 2 South Australia’s Marine Ecosystems and Biodiversity……………………………………………..9 2.1 Oceans, Gulfs and Estuaries – South Australia’s Oceanographic Environments……………………….9 2.1.1 Productivity…………………………………………………………………………………….9 2.1.2 Estuaries………………………………………………………………………………………..9 2.2 Rocky Cliffs and Gulfs, to Mangrove Shores -South Australia’s Coastal Environments………………………………………………………………13 2.2.1 Offshore Islands………………………………………………………………………………14 2.2.2 Gulf Ecosystems………………………………………………………………………………14 2.2.3 Northern Spencer Gulf………………………………………………………………………...14
    [Show full text]
  • Buckland Dry Creek Salt Fields & Sanctuaries
    Buckland KORUNYE Dry Creek LOWER LIGHT REEVES PLAINS Salt Fields & Sanctuaries Legend Freehold Land TWO WELLS Salt Creek MIDDLE BEACH LEWISTON Government/Crown ek Cre alt Land S XF 2 Sea Water Inflow XE 1-3 ML 6514 XF 1 Mineral Tenements / Private Mines Gawler River XE 4 XE 5 Ponds k e e r C PORT GAWLER n Vegetation Impacts o XE 6 s p m o h PENFIELD GARDENS Bolivar Outflow Channel T ADELAIDE INTERNATIONAL BIRD SANCTUARY XE 6 VIRGINIA Northern Connector XE 6A Creeks XE 7 XD 1 Adelaide International Bird Sanctuary National BUCKLAND PARK XB 3 XC 1 Park XB 6 PENFIELD SA Water XB 5 XC 2E Adelaide Dolphin Bolivar Outflow XB 4 XA 3 XC 3 Sanctuary XC 2 EDINBURGH XA 4 XA 2 WATERLOO CORNER 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 XA 7 DIREK XB 8 XC 2S XA 1 ± Kilometers XB 8A PA 3 Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 54 Projection: Transverse Mercator PA 4 Datum: GDA 1994 PA 5 BURTON Produced by: Robbie Jones St Kilda Marina Date: 8/01/2021 PA 6 On Behalf of: Mineral Resources Division ADELAIDE DOLPHIN SANCTUARY ST KILDA Bolivar Waste Water Department of Energy & Mining PA 7A Government of South Australia PA 7 Ponds & Plant PA 8 ADELAIDE PARALOWIE INTERNATIONAL BIRD SANCTUARY PA 9 k e r Barker re e v C i e R Inlet u rq a OUTER HARBOR a r B PA 10 a P BOLIVAR e l t k t TORRENS ISLAND i ee PA 11 r L C ws rro Bu Buckland OSBORNE GLOBE DERBY PARK NORTH HAVEN Dry Creek Dry Creek Salt Fields PA 12 GREEN FIELDS Br oa d C ML 6514 re ek Closed Crystallisers TAPEROO GARDEN ISLAND N o r th DRY CREEK A r m Open Crystallisers LARGS NORTH C re e k CAVAN LARGS BAY POORAKA PETERHEAD GILLMAN BIRKENHEAD SEMAPHORE EXETER PORT ADELAIDE WINGFIELD GEPPS CROSS DISCLAIMER: The Department for Energy & Mining uses the best available data.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Port Adelaide Enfield Heritage Review
    CITY OF PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD HERITAGE REVIEW MARCH 2014 McDougall & Vines Conservation and Heritage Consultants 27 Sydenham Road, Norwood, South Australia 5067 Ph (08) 8362 6399 Fax (08) 8363 0121 Email: [email protected] PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD HERITAGE REVIEW CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Objectives of Review 1.2 Stage 1 & 2 Outcomes 2.0 NARRATIVE THEMATIC HISTORY - THEMES & SUB-THEMES 3 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Chronological History of Land Division and Settlement Patterns 2.2.1 Introduction 2.2.2 Land Use to 1850 - the Old and New Ports 2.2.3 1851-1870 - Farms and Villages 2.2.4 1870-1885 - Consolidation of Settlement 2.2.5 1885-1914 - Continuing Land Division 2.2.6 1915-1927 - War and Town Planning 2.2.7 1928-1945 - Depression and Industrialisation 2.2.8 1946-1979 - Post War Development 2.3 Historic Themes 18 Theme 1: Creating Port Adelaide Enfield's Physical Environment and Context T1.1 Natural Environment T1.2 Settlement Patterns Theme 2: Governing Port Adelaide Enfield T2.1 Levels of Government T2.2 Port Governance T2.3 Law and Order T2.4 Defence T2.5 Fire Protection T2.6 Utilities Theme 3: Establishing Port Adelaide Enfield's State-Based Institutions Theme 4: Living in Port Adelaide Enfield T4.1 Housing the Community T4.2 Development of Domestic Architecture in Port Adelaide Enfield Theme 5: Building Port Adelaide Enfield's Commercial Base 33 T5.1 Port Activities T5.2 Retail Facilities T5.3 Financial Services T5.4 Hotels T5.5 Other Commercial Enterprises Theme 6: Developing Port Adelaide Enfield's Agricultural
    [Show full text]
  • Proclamation 2010
    No. 40 3109 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE www.governmentgazette.sa.gov.au PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 24 JUNE 2010 CONTENTS Page Page Acts Assented To..................................................................... 3110 REGULATIONS Appointments, Resignations, Etc............................................. 3110 Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1986 Associations Incorporation Act 1985—Notice ........................ 3112 (No. 154 of 2010)............................................................. 3162 Corporations and District Councils—Notices.......................... 3247 Primary Produce (Food Safety Schemes) Act 2004 Development Act 1993—Notices............................................ 3112 (No. 155 of 2010)............................................................. 3209 Dog Fence Act 1946—Notice ................................................. 3112 Upper South East Dryland Salinity and Flood Essential Services Commission Act 2002—Notice ................. 3112 Management Act 2002 (No. 156 of 2010) ....................... 3211 Fisheries Management Act 2007—Notice............................... 3113 Primary Industry Funding Schemes Act 1998 Gaming Machines Act 1992—Notices .................................... 3113 (No. 157 of 2010)............................................................. 3213 Health Care Act 2008—Notices .............................................. 3117 Fisheries Management
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Values Count?
    WHOSE VALUES COUNT? CLASS, PLACE AND HERITAGE DURING WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PORT ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA Adam Paterson This thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide January 2015 Abstract In Australia there has been little critical reflection on the role that class plays during negotiations over cultural heritage. This stands in contrast to the United Kingdom and the United States, where research aiming to develop a better understanding of how class shapes cultural heritage practice is more common. Key research themes in these countries include identifying how working-class people participate in cultural heritage activities; determining what barriers exist to their participation and what social purpose cultural heritage has within post-industrial communities; and understanding how cultural heritage is used in negotiations over the classed meanings of place during gentrification. This thesis explores the relationships between class, place and heritage in Port Adelaide, South Australia. Once a prosperous industrial and commercial port, since the 1980s Port Adelaide has undergone slow social and economic change. In 2002, the State Government announced plans for major re-development of surplus waterfront land in order to generate profit and economic stimulation for the Port through extensive and rapid development, radically transforming Port Adelaide physically and socially. Drawing on a theoretical framework that
    [Show full text]