Bay Region Summary

2014 Congestion & Mobility Report

Chapter 2 BAY REGION SUMMARY

Performance Measures Definitions...... 4 Regional User Delay Cost Per Mile...... 6 Regional Congestion Hours...... 7 Ranked UDC by Location...... 9 Mobility Measures: I-69 Corridor...... 10 Mobility Measures: I-75 Corridor...... 19 Mobility Measures: I-475 Corridor...... 33 Mobility Measures: I-675 Corridor...... 40 Mobility Measures: US-10 Corridor...... 46 Mobility Measures: US-23 Corridor...... 52 Mobility Measures: US-127 Corridor...... 58 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2 Performance Measures Definitions

Delay No Delay Delay POSTED SPEED

60 MPH*

ACTUAL SPEED

Total delay > Delay is calculated by taking the difference between actual speeds when they fall below 60 mph and the posted speed limit for freeways posted at 70 mph. ThisPOSTED is to SP takeEED out the delay caused Delay No Delay Delay by the lower average speeds from commercial vehicles.Recurring POSTED SPEED 60 MPH Recurring Total delay per mile > Delay per mile is calculated by taking the total60 delay MPH and dividing it by the length of the freeway. This was performed for each route in each county. AVERAGE SPEED Non-recurring Non-recurring/recurring delay > Non-recurring delay is calculated ACTUALby taking SPEED the difference between the actual speed (any time the speed falls below 60 mph) andACTUAL the average SPEED speed. Recurring is measured by taking the difference of the total delay and non-recurring delay.

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th %POSTED 95th SP %EED 16.0 Recurring 60 MPH* 14.0 Recurring AVERAGE SPEED 12.0 Small di erence Non-recurring Large di erence between average ACTUALbetween SPEEDaverage 10.0 and 95th percentile and 95th percentile travel times travel times 8.0 Minutes 6.0 User Delay Cost > User Delay Costs (UDC) is calculated by multiplying delay x hourly volume per 4.0 hourly user cost.Northbou Delay isnd calculated Travel Times by taking the differenceAvg between 75th % actual 95th speeds % when they fall below 16.0602.0 mph and the postedReliable speed limit. Hourly volumes Unreliableare derived from Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Commercial Average Daily Traffic (CADT). Hourly user costs are based on Federal Highway 14.0 Administration0.0 (FHWA) publication number FHWA-SA-98-079, “Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design.”12.0 Small di erence Large di erence 1:00 PM PM 2:00 PM 3:00 4:00 PM 4:00 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM between AM 1:00 2:00 AM average3:00 AM 4:00 AM AM 5:00 6:00 AM AM 7:00 8:00 AM 9:00 AM between average 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 10.0 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM and > 95th Congestion percentile is calculated as the number of hours belowand 95th45 percentilemph per Traffic Message Congestiontravel times Time of Day travel times Channel8.0 (TMC). A TMC is a standard for delivering real-time traffic information. They vary from tenths Minutes of a mile6.0 long to several miles long.

Weighted4.0 Congestion > Number of congestion hours multiplied by the segment length. Congestion along longer segments will get more consideration than congestion along shorter segments. 2.0 Reliable Unreliable

0.0 * On segments with a speed limit of 55 mph, delay is calculated when speeds fall below 55 mph. 1:00 PM PM 2:00 PM 3:00 4:00 PM 4:00 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 1:00 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM AM 5:00 6:00 AM AM 7:00 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

Time of Day 4 Delay No Delay Delay POSTED SPEED

60 MPH

ACTUAL SPEED > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

POSTED SPEED Recurring Chapter 2 60 MPH Recurring AVERAGE SPEED Non-recurring Performance MeasuresACTUAL Definitions SPEED

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 16.0

14.0

12.0 Small di erence Large di erence between average between average 10.0 and 95th percentile and 95th percentile travel times travel times 8.0 Minutes 6.0

4.0

2.0 Reliable Unreliable

0.0 1:00 PM PM 2:00 PM 3:00 4:00 PM 4:00 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 1:00 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM AM 5:00 6:00 AM AM 7:00 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

Time of Day

Travel Time Reliability > A measure of travel time consistency over a period of time. When travel times are unreliable, customers are more likely to experience unexpected delays. Travel times are shown to be reliable when the 95th percentile travel time remains close to the average travel time. 75th Percentile Travel Time > The amount of time a customer should budget to be on-time three out of four days (75% of the time). 95th Percentile Travel Time > The amount of time a customer should budget to be on-time nineteen out of twenty days (95% of the time). The 95th percentile travel time is also known as the planning time.

5 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 1. 2014 Bay Region user delay cost per mile Chapter 2

2014 Bay Region User Delay Cost per Mile 4

®210 ®2127

¦¨§675

¦¨§75

¦¨§475

¦¨§69

®223

2014 UDC per Mile < $75,000 $75,000 - $150,000 > $150,000

6 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 2. 2014 Bay Region congestion hours northbound/eastbound Chapter 2 2014 Bay Region Congestion Hours Northbound/Eastbound 4

®210 ®2127

¦¨§675

¦¨§75

¦¨§475

¦¨§69

®223

2014 Congestion Hours < 50 50 - 100 > 100

7 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 3. 2014 Bay Region congestion hours southbound/westbound Chapter 2 2014 Bay Region Congestion Hours Southbound/Westbound 4

®210 ®2127

¨¦§675

¨¦§75

¨¦§475

¨¦§69

®223

2014 Congestion Hours < 50 50 - 100 > 100

8 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 4. 2014 Bay Region UDC Data 2014 Chapter 2 Bay Region

2012-2013 Average 2014 Rank UDC Per Mile Location (Route, County) Rank UDC Per Mile Location (Route, County) 1 $103,387 I-675 Saginaw Co. 1 $102,217 I-69 Genesee Co. 2 $100,902 I-69 Genesee Co. 2 $94,779 US-23 Genesee Co. 3 $96,953 I-475 Genesee Co. 3 $93,116 I-75 Genesee Co. 4 $84,191 US-23 Genesee Co. 4 $73,536 I-675 Saginaw Co. 5 $82,281 I-75 Genesee Co. 5 $67,904 I-475 Genesee Co. 6 $63,996 I-75 Saginaw Co. 6 $58,480 I-75 Saginaw Co. 7 $45,927 US-10 Bay Co. 7 $52,443 US-10 Bay Co. 8 $36,521 I-69 Lapeer Co. 8 $26,712 I-75 Bay Co. 9 $27,209 I-75 Bay Co. 9 $23,562 I-69 Lapeer Co. 10 $14,434 US-127 Gratiot Co. (70 mph section) 10 $10,290 I-75 Arenac Co. 11 $12,465 US-10 Midland Co. 11 $8,556 US-127 Gratiot Co. (70 mph section) 12 $9,549 US-127 Isabella Co. 12 $5,604 US-127 Isabella Co. 13 $8,353 I-75 Arenac Co. 13 $5,298 US-10 Midland Co. 14 $7,837 US-10 Isabella Co. 14 $5,016 US-10 Isabella Co. 15 $3,535 US-127 Clare Co. 15 $2,601 US-127 Clare Co.

2012-2013 Average 2014 Rank Total UDC Location (Route, County) Rank Total UDC Location (Route, County) 1 $4,843,274 I-69 Genesee Co. 1 $5,214,500 I-75 Genesee Co. 2 $4,607,748 I-75 Genesee Co. 2 $4,906,422 I-69 Genesee Co. 3 $3,490,304 I-475 Genesee Co. 3 $3,040,965 I-75 Saginaw Co. 4 $3,327,773 I-75 Saginaw Co. 4 $2,444,542 I-475 Genesee Co. 5 $2,104,775 US-23 Genesee Co. 5 $2,369,468 US-23 Genesee Co. 6 $2,067,745 I-675 Saginaw Co. 6 $1,682,851 I-75 Bay Co. 7 $2,008,654 I-69 Lapeer Co. 7 $1,470,715 I-675 Saginaw Co. 8 $1,714,151 I-75 Bay Co. 8 $1,311,067 US-10 Bay Co. 9 $1,148,174 US-10 Bay Co. 9 $1,295,929 I-69 Lapeer Co. 10 $735,420 US-10 Midland Co. 10 $607,105 I-75 Arenac Co. 11 $592,010 US-127 Isabella Co. 11 $347,478 US-127 Isabella Co. 12 $577,368 US-127 Gratiot Co. (70 mph section) 12 $342,231 US-127 Gratiot Co. (70 mph section) 13 $492,833 I-75 Arenac Co. 13 $312,570 US-10 Midland Co. 14 $266,460 US-10 Isabella Co. 14 $174,810 US-127 Clare Co. 15 $237,575 US-127 Clare Co. 15 $170,532 US-10 Isabella Co. Total = $28,214,262 Total = $25,691,185

9 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Interstate 69: Genesee and Lapeer

Interstate 75: Genesee, Saginaw, Bay, and Arenac

Interstate 475: Genesee

Interstate 675: Saginaw

US-10: Clare, Isabella, Midland, and Bay

US-23: Genesee

US-127: Gratiot, Isabella, and Clare

10 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 5. Genesee County I-69 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Genesee County I-69 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$1,800,000

$1,600,000

$1,400,000

$1,200,000

$1,000,000

$800,000

$600,000

$400,000

$200,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

11 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 6. Lapeer County I-69 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Lapeer County I-69 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$500,000

$450,000

$400,000

$350,000

$300,000

$250,000

$200,000

$150,000

$100,000

$50,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

12 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

F i g ur e 7. Bay Region I-69 eastbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I‐69 Eastbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70

68 Interchange Interchange Interchange

24 75 15 ‐ ‐ ‐ I M 66 M

64 (mph)

Speed

62 Average

56 145 138 141 143 128 129 131 133 137 135 136 168 123 149 155 159 163 153 139

LINE LINE

(WEST)

ST/EXIT 15/EXIT 53/EXIT 13/EXIT 24/EXIT 23/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT

COUNTY COUNTY

FWY/EXIT HWY/EXIT

CREEK) M ‐ M ‐ M ‐ M ‐

ELBA IRISH 75/US ‐ ‐ BELSAY MILLER I CENTER WILDER SAGINAW MORRISH PLEASANT

54/DORT NEPESSING 475/UAW (SWARTZ

‐ I 121/BRISTOL M ‐ RD HAMMERBERG

LAKE M ‐ LAKE LAPEER/GENESEE GENESEE/LAPEER VLEET

VAN

13 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 8. Bay Region I‐69 westbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I-69 Westbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 han ge han ge han ge

68 I-75 Interc I-75 M-24 Interc M-24 M-15 Interc M-15

ph ) 64 d (mee d

ag e Sp 62 Av er

56 IN E IN E G RD/EXIT 153 M-53/EXIT 168 M-24/EXIT 155 M-15/EXIT 145 IN LS AY RD/EXIT 141 BA EL BA RD/EXIT 149 IRISH RD/EXIT143 EN TERRD/EXIT 139 GI NAW ST/EXIT 136 ESS BE MI LLE R RD/EXIT 129 I-75/US-23/EXIT 133 C R WILDE R RD/EXIT 159 SA MORRISH RD/EXIT 128 NEP (S WARTZ CREEK) (WEST) EE /LAPEERCOUNTY L I-475/UAW FWY/EXIT 137 M-54/DORT HWY/EXIT 138 HAMMERBERG RD/EXIT135 LAKE PLEASANT RD/EXIT 163 M-121/BRISTOL RD/EXIT 131 LAKE LAR/GENESEEPEE COUNTY L GENES VAN EE TVL RD

14 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Figure 9. Travel time reliability: I-69

Segment 2 Flint Flint Twp Segment 3

Segment 1

Waterford Twp

15 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 10. Segment 1- I-69 between M-13 and I-75/US-23 Chapter 2 Segment 1 Travel time (minutes) for I-69 between M-13/Exit 123 and I-75/US-23/Exit 133

Eastbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 18.0

16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0 Minutes

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 9:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 12:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 Time of Day

Westbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0

Minutes 6.0

4.0

2.0

16 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 11. Segment 2- I-69 between I-475/Uaw Fwy and I-75/US-23 Chapter 2 Segment 2 Travel time (minutes) for I-69 between I-475/Uaw Fwy/Exit 137 and I-75/US-23/Exit 133

Eastbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0 nu tes

Mi 3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 12:00 AM 12:00 Time of Day

Westbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0 nu tes

Mi 3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 11:00 AM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 12:00 AM 12:00 Time of Day

17 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 12. Segment 3- I-69 between I-475/Uaw Fwy and M-15 Chapter 2 Segment 3 Travel time (minutes) for I-69 between I-475/Uaw Fwy/Exit 137 and M-15/Exit 145

Eastbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0 nu tes

Mi 6.0

4.0

2.0

Westbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0 nu tes Mi 6.0

4.0

2.0

18 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Interstate 69: Genesee and Lapeer

Interstate 75: Genesee, Saginaw, Bay, and Arenac

Interstate 475: Genesee

Interstate 675: Saginaw

US-10: Clare, Isabella, Midland, and Bay

US-23: Genesee

US-127: Gratiot, Isabella, and Clare

19 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 13. Genesee County I-75 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Genesee County I-75 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$1,800,000

$1,600,000

$1,400,000

$1,200,000

$1,000,000

$800,000

$600,000

$400,000

$200,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

20 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 14. Saginaw County I-75 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Saginaw County I-75 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$800,000

$700,000

$600,000

$500,000

$400,000

$300,000

$200,000

$100,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

21 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 15. Bay County I-75 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Bay County I-75 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$350,000

$300,000

$250,000

$200,000

$150,000

$100,000

$50,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

22 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 16. Arenac County I-75 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Arenac County I-75 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$140,000

$120,000

$100,000

$80,000

$60,000

$40,000

$20,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

23 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

F i g ur e 17. Bay Region I-75 northbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I‐75 Northbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 Jct.

South

68 Interchange Interchange 675 ‐ 69 I 10 ‐ ‐ I US

64 (mph)

Speed

62 Average

56 69 ‐ 202 212 190 195 164 164 160 162 181 188 122 125 675 151 154 155 153 131 126 117 109 111 116 136 144 108 168 173 118 149 I

LINE ‐

I SPLIT

23 ‐ FREEWAY

US ST/EXIT 33/EXIT 61/EXIT 84/EXIT 25/EXIT 23/EXIT 81/EXIT 57/EXIT 83/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT

‐ ‐ ‐

475/EXIT 675/EXIT 475/EXIT COUNTY AVE/EXIT ‐ ‐ ‐

HWY/EXIT HWY/EXIT I I I M ‐ M ‐ M ‐ M ‐ M ‐

US CONN/EXIT BEGIN CITY

54/M 10/M ADAM 13 ‐ ‐ HOLLY 75 DIXIE ‐ MILLAR WILDER BEAVER I MORRIS M ‐

PIERSON M ‐ US BL/COOK STERLING LINWOOD 54/DORT MT 13/BAY 75 ‐ 121/BRISTOL ‐ PINCONNING I 21/CORUNNA M ‐ 46/HOLLAND M ‐ M ‐ M ‐ M ‐ GENESEE/SAGINAW

24 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 18. Bay Region I-75 southbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I-75 Southbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 han ge han ge th Jct. Sou th 68 67 5 I- I-69 Interc I-69 US-10 Interc US-10

ph ) 64 d (mee d

ag e Sp 62 Av er

56 I-69 WA Y I-675 T /EXI T 106 /EXI T 144 /EXIT 164 US-23 SPLIT EXIT 108 RD/EXIT 195 RD/ CO UNTY LINE CO UNTY LINE GI N FREE HW Y HW Y G I-675/EXIT 155 I-475/EXIT 111 I-475/EXIT 125 M-84/EXIT 160 M-61/EXIT 190 M-33/EXIT 202 M-57/EXIT 131 M-81/EXIT 151 US-23/EXIT188 N ADAM ST/EXIT 154 RLI HOLL Y WOO DRD/EXIT 173 DIXIE DIXIE E MI LLAR RD/EXIT 117 R WILDE R RD/EXIT 164 BEAVERRD/EXIT 168 I-75 BE M-54/M-83/EXIT 136 T G RD/EXITG ONNIN 181 PI ERSON RD/EXIT 122 M-13-CO NN US-10/M-25/EXIT 162 S LI N PIN C M-54/DORT HWY/EXIT 109 46 /HOLLAND AVE/EXIT149 EE /SAGINAW M-13/BAYCITY RD/EXIT 153 M-121/BRISTOL RD/EXIT 116 M-21/CORUNNARD/EXIT 118 M- S NE SAGINAW/GENESEE GE

25 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Figure 19. Travel time reliability: I-75

Saginaw Bay

Midland Bay City Segment 6

Segment 5

Saginaw

Frankenmuth Segment 4

Segment 3 Flint Flint Twp

Segment 2

Segment 1

Waterford Twp

26 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 20. Segment 1- I-75 between US-24/Dixie Hwy and I-475 Chapter 2 Segment 1 Travel time (minutes) for I-75 between US-24/Dixie Hwy/Exit 93 and I-475/Exit 111

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 25.0

20.0

15.0 nu tes

Mi 10.0

5.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 30.0

25.0

20.0

15.0 nu tes Mi

10.0

5.0

27 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 21. Segment 2- I-75 between I-69 and I-475/Exit 111 Chapter 2 Segment 2 Travel time (minutes) for I-75 between I-69 and I-475/Exit 111

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0 nu tes 4.0 Mi

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 12:00 AM 12:00 Time of Day

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0 nu tes Mi 3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 11:00 AM 11:00 12:00 AM 12:00 AM 10:00 Time of Day

28 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 22. Segment 3- I-75 between I-69 and I-475/Exit 125 Chapter 2 Segment 3 Travel time (minutes) for I-75 between I-69 and I-475/Exit 125

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 12.0

10.0

8.0

6.0 nu tes Mi

4.0

2.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0 nu tes

Mi 6.0

4.0

2.0

29 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 23. Segment 4- I-75 between I-675 and I-475 Chapter 2 Segment 4 Travel time (minutes) for I-75 between I-675 and I-475/Exit 125

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 35.0

30.0

25.0

20.0 nu tes

Mi 15.0

10.0

5.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 30.0

25.0

20.0

15.0 nu tes Mi

10.0

5.0

30 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 24. Segment 5- I-75 between I-675/Exit 155 and I-675 Chapter 2 Segment 5 Travel time (minutes) for I-75 between I-675/Exit 155 and I-675

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0 nu tes 4.0 Mi

3.0

2.0

1.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 12.0

10.0

8.0

6.0 nu tes Mi

4.0

2.0

31 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 25. Segment 6- I-75 between I-675/Exit 155 and US-10/M-25

Segment 6 Chapter 2 Travel time (minutes) for I-75 between I-675/Exit 155 and US-10/M-25/Exit 162

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0 nu tes 4.0 Mi

3.0

2.0

1.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 10.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0 nu tes

Mi 4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

32 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Interstate 69: Genesee and Lapeer

Interstate 75: Genesee, Saginaw, Bay, and Arenac

Interstate 475: Genesee

Interstate 675: Saginaw

US-10: Clare, Isabella, Midland, and Bay

US-23: Genesee

US-127: Gratiot, Isabella, and Clare

33 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 26. Genesee County I-475 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Genesee County I-475 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$800,000

$700,000

$600,000

$500,000

$400,000

$300,000

$200,000

$100,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

34 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

F i g ur e 27. Bay Region I-475 northbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I‐475 Northbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70

68 Interchange Interchange

69 St

‐ I

66 Saginaw

64 (mph)

Speed

62 Average

56 4 6 7 2 4 5 9

75 13 15 10 11 23 8B 8A

‐

I ST/EXIT 75/US ‐ 69/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT

‐ ‐

ST/EXIT I I AVE/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT

RD/EXIT

BLVD/EXIT HILL CLIO 21/COURT PIERSON HEMPHILL SAGINAW DAVISON STEWART ATHERTON M ‐ 121/BRISTOL CARPENTER LONGWAY M ‐

35 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 28. Bay Region I-475 southbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I-475 Southbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 han ge han ge

68 I-69 Interc I-69 w St IntercSt na w

66 Sa gi

ph ) 64 d (mee d

ag e Sp 62 Av er

56 I-75 I-75/US-23 I-69/EXIT 6 HIL L RD/EXIT 2 Y BLY VD /EXIT 8A CLIORD/EXIT 15 GI NAW ST/EXIT 13 WA 21/ COURT ST/EXIT 7 PI ERSON RD/EXIT 10 HEMPHI LL RD/EXIT 4 RP ENTER RD/EXIT 11 SA DAVISON RD/EXIT 8B STEWART AVE/EXIT9 ATHERTON RD/EXIT 5 M- CA ON G L M-121/BRISTOL RD/EXIT 4

36 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Figure 29. Travel time reliability: I-475

Segment 2

Flint Flint Twp Segment 1

Waterford Twp

37 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 30. Segment 1- I-475 between I-75 and I-69 Chapter 2 Segment 1 Travel time (minutes) for I-475 between I-75 and I-69/Exit 6

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0 nu tes 4.0 Mi

3.0

2.0

1.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0 nu tes 4.0 Mi

3.0

2.0

1.0

38 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 31. Segment 2- I-475 between I-75/US-23 and I-69 Chapter 2 Segment 2 Travel time (minutes) for I-475 between I-75/US-23 and I-69/Exit 6

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0 nu tes Mi 6.0

4.0

2.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0 nu tes Mi 6.0

4.0

2.0

39 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Interstate 69: Genesee and Lapeer

Interstate 75: Genesee, Saginaw, Bay, and Arenac

Interstate 475: Genesee

Interstate 675: Saginaw

US-10: Clare, Isabella, Midland, and Bay

US-23: Genesee

US-127: Gratiot, Isabella, and Clare

40 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 32. Saginaw County I-675 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Saginaw County I-675 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$250,000

$200,000

$150,000

$100,000

$50,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

41 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 33. Bay Region I-675 northbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I‐675 Northbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 64 Interchange

62 Interchange

60 Wadsworth Tittabawassee

58 (mph)

Speed

56 Average

50 2 6 1 3

23 AVE

(FLINT)

75/US ‐ RD/EXIT 23 ‐

I PKY/EXIT AVE/EXIT AVE/EXIT

WARREN 75/US ‐ ‐ I MEMORIAL

DAVENPORT WADSWORTH TITTABAWASSEE VETERANS

42 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 34. Bay Region I-675 southbound Chapter 2 Bay Region I-675 Southbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 66 han ge han ge

64 ss eeInterc

62 Interc ad sworth W Titt abawa

60 ph )

d (mee d 58 ag e Sp Av er 56

50 I-75/US-23 WA RREN AVE ORT H AVE/EXIT 2 I-75/US-23 (FLINT) DAVENPORT AVE/EXIT 3 WA DSW TITTABAWASSEE RD/EXIT 6 VETERANS MEMORIALPKY/EXIT 1

43 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Figure 35. Travel time reliability: I-675

Saginaw Bay

Midland Bay City

Segment 1 Saginaw

Frankenmuth

Flint Flint Twp

Waterford Twp > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 36. Segment 1- I-675 Chapter 2 Segment 1 Travel time (minutes) for I-675

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0 Minutes 6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM Time of Day

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0

Minutes 6.0

4.0

2.0

45 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Interstate 69: Genesee and Lapeer

Interstate 75: Genesee, Saginaw, Bay, and Arenac

Interstate 475: Genesee

Interstate 675: Saginaw

US-10: Clare, Isabella, Midland, and Bay

US-23: Genesee

US-127: Gratiot, Isabella, and Clare

46 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

F i g ur e 37. Isabella/Clare Counties US-10 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Isabella/Clare Counties US-10 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$40,000

$35,000

$30,000

$25,000

$20,000

$15,000

$10,000

$5,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

47 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 38. Midland County US-10 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Midland County US-10 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$100,000

$90,000

$80,000

$70,000

$60,000

$50,000

$40,000

$30,000

$20,000

$10,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

48 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 39. Bay County US-10 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Bay County US-10 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$300,000

$250,000

$200,000

$150,000

$100,000

$50,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

49 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 40. Bay Region US-10 eastbound Chapter 2 Bay Region US‐10 Eastbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 Interchange Interchange 68 Interchange 30 20 ‐ ‐ 127 ‐ M M US

64 (mph)

Speed

62 Average

56 30 18 47 23 20 BR BR RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD ‐ ‐

‐

115 AVE ‐

SPLIT SPLIT M ‐ M ‐ M ‐

10 ‐ 127 ‐ CITY ‐

BR/M RIVER US 75/US STATE ‐ STARK 10/M

‐ I ‐ WALDO LOOMIS 10 BAY ‐ GARFIELD US COLEMAN BR/US OLD ‐ MACKINAW US RD/AUBURN

SOUTHERN NORTHERN 10 ‐ BR/EASTMAN ‐ US 127 127 10 MILE ‐

‐ ‐ 9 US 10/US 10/US ‐ ‐ US US

50 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 41. Bay Region US-10 westbound Chapter 2 Bay Region US-10 Westbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 han ge han ge han ge

68 7 Interc 12 7 M-20 Interc M-20 M-30 Interc M-30 US-

ph ) 64 d (mee d

ag e Sp 62 Av er

56 M-30 M-18 M-47 W RD M-115 US-127 LDO RD INA RIVERRD US-10-BR STARK RD LE MANRD I-75/US-23 WA LOOMIS RD BAY CITY RD GARFIELD RD US-10/M-115 CO OLD STATE RD MA CK US-10-BR/M-20 US-10-BR/US-127-BR MI LE RD/AUBURN RD 9 9 US-10-BR/EASTMAN AVE

51 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Interstate 69: Genesee and Lapeer

Interstate 75: Genesee, Saginaw, Bay, and Arenac

Interstate 475: Genesee

Interstate 675: Saginaw

US-10: Clare, Isabella, Midland, and Bay

US-23: Genesee

US-127: Gratiot, Isabella, and Clare

52 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 42. Genesee County US-23 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Genesee County US-23 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$1,000,000

$900,000

$800,000

$700,000

$600,000

$500,000

$400,000

$300,000

$200,000

$100,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

53 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 43. Bay Region US-23 northbound Chapter 2 Bay Region US‐23 Northbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70

68 Interchange Interchange

Rd.

Blanc

Lk.

Gd. 66 Silver

64 (mph)

Speed

62 Average

56 75 88 79 78 90 84 80

‐ I LINE

RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT RD/EXIT

COUNTY

HILL LAKE

BLANC

BR/OWEN ‐ RD/TORREY THOMPSON 23 ‐ GRAND BR/SILVER ‐ US 23 NORTH ‐ US GENESEE/LIVINGSTON

54 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 44. Bay Region US-23 southbound Chapter 2 Bay Region US-23 Southbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 han ge han ge

68 Gd. Blanc Interc BlancGd.

66 IntercRd. Lk. lv er Si

ph ) 64 d (mee d

ag e Sp 62 Av er

56 IN E I-75 RD/EXIT 79 KE HIL L RD/EXIT 90 THOMPSON RD/EXIT 84 GRAND BLANC RD/EXIT 88 US-23-BR/OWEN RD/EXIT 78 EE /LIVINGSTON COUNTY L NORTH R D/ TORREY RD/EXIT 80 S NE US-23-BR/SILVERLA GE

55 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Figure 45. Travel time reliability: US-23

Flint Flint Twp

Segment 1

Waterford Twp

56 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 46. Segment 1- US-23 between I-75 and I-96 Chapter 2 Segment 1 Travel time (minutes) for US-23 between I-75 and I-96/Exit 60

Northbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 40.0

35.0

30.0

25.0

20.0 nu tes Mi 15.0

10.0

5.0

Southbound Travel Times Avg 75th % 95th % 40.0

35.0

30.0

25.0

20.0 nu tes Mi 15.0

10.0

5.0

57 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Chapter 2

Interstate 69: Genesee and Lapeer

Interstate 75: Genesee, Saginaw, Bay, and Arenac

Interstate 475: Genesee

Interstate 675: Saginaw

US-10: Clare, Isabella, Midland, and Bay

US-23: Genesee

US-127: Gratiot, Isabella, and Clare

58 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

F i g ur e 47. Gratiot County US-127 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Gratiot County US-127 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$90,000

$80,000

$70,000

$60,000

$50,000

$40,000

$30,000

$20,000

$10,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

59 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 48. Isabella County US-127 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Isabella County US-127 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$90,000

$80,000

$70,000

$60,000

$50,000

$40,000

$30,000

$20,000

$10,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

60 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 49. Clare County US-127 Corridor total user delay cost Chapter 2

ARENAC

CLARE GLADWIN

HURON

BAY

ISABELLA MIDLAND

TUSCOLA SANILAC

SAGINAW GRATIOT

LAPEER GENESEE 4

Clare County US-127 Corridor User Delay Cost Total User Delay Cost 2012-13 Avg. Recurring 2012-13 Avg. Non-Recurring 2014 Recurring 2014 Non-Recurring

$45,000

$40,000

$35,000

$30,000

$25,000

$20,000

$15,000

$10,000

$5,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

61 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 50. Bay Region US-127 northbound Chapter 2 Bay Region US‐127 Northbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 Interchange

68 Interchange Interchange 46 20 10 ‐ ‐ ‐ M M US

64 (mph)

Speed

62 Average

56 ST ST ST 10 61 27 RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD

‐ ‐ ‐

115 ‐ US US

(CLARE)

BR/M 10/M ‐ BR PLEASANT)

BR/POLK BR/STATE 127 ‐ US BR/ALGER ‐ ROSEBUSH BR/OLD BR/CENTER 20/PICKARD BR/MISSION 127 ‐ (MT BR/LINCOLN BLANCHARD

‐ 46/MONROE 127 ‐ US ‐ MANNSIDING ‐ 127 ‐ M ‐ 127 ‐ ‐ ‐ BR 127 ‐ 127 ‐ US ‐ ‐ 127 ‐ US 127 ‐ ‐ ‐ US US US US BR/M US 127 ‐ US ‐ US 127 ‐ ‐ US

62 > CONGESTION & MOBILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures

Figure 51. Bay Region US-127 southbound Chapter 2 Bay Region US-127 Southbound

2 Yr Avg AM Peak 2014 AM Peak 2 Yr Avg PM Peak 2014 PM Peak 70 han ge han ge han ge 68 US-10 Interc US-10 M-20 Interc M-20 M-46 Interc M-46

ph ) 64 d (mee d

ag e Sp 62 Av er

56 T) AN US-10 TA TE RD LE AS BR/ S US-10/M-115 ROSEBUSH RD BR /CENTER ST - BLANCHARD RD US-127-BR/M-61 DINGMANNSI RD M-20/PICKARD ST US-127-BR (CLARE) US-127-BR/POLK RD US-127- US-127-BR/ALGER RD US-127-BR/OLD US-27 US-127 US-127-BR/MISSION ST US-127-BR/LINCOLNRD US-127-BR (MT P US-127-BR/M-46/MONROE RD

P r ro s fo vid ice ing rv the ty se highest quali ion life. tat of or ity integ ansp ual ec rated tr q on ved omi pro c benefit and im