Historical Precedent? American Press Policy in Occupied Iraq Cora Sol Goldstein Department of Political Science California State University at Long Beach Long Beach, California 90840-4605
[email protected] Prepared for delivery at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30th-September 2nd, 2007. The American occupation of Germany (1945-1949) stands as a model of a successful exercise in democratization by force. In fact, top figures in the Bush administration, including Condoleezza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld, have compared the American experiences in postwar Germany and in postwar Iraq. In this paper, I compare American information control policy in Germany (1945-1949) and Iraq (2003-2006).The comparative analysis indicates that the American information control policy was very different in the two cases. In Germany, the U.S. Army and the Office of Military Government U.S. in Germany (OMGUS) exerted rigorous control over the media to block Nazi propaganda and introduce the American political agenda of democratization. With the emergence of the Cold War, OMGUS and its Soviet counterpart, the Sowjetische Militaradministration in Deutschland (SMAD), used all the avenues of mass communications and cultural affairs–newspapers, journals, feature and documentary films, posters, and radio–to disseminate their strategic propaganda and to deliver the messages coming from Washington and Moscow. Therefore, from 1945 to 1949, the Americans were able to shape the content of information in the American zone and sector. In the case of Iraq, the Coalition forces failed to exert a similar degree of information control. As a result of this strategic error, the insurgency and civilian movements opposed to the American presence in Iraq have been able to control information and spread their anti-American messages.