Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Case 1:07-cv-22459-AJ Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (Miami Division) Case Nos. 07-22459 & 08-21063 (JORDAN/MCALILEY) ELOY ROJAS MAMANI, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) GONZALO SÁNCHEZ DE LOZADA ) SÁNCHEZ BUSTAMANTE, ) ) Defendant, ) ) JOSÉ CARLOS SÁNCHEZ BERZAÍN, ) ) Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS Alan M. Dershowitz (pro hac vice) Gregory B. Craig (pro hac vice) Jack Landman Goldsmith III (pro hac vice) Howard W. Gutman (pro hac vice) Ana C. Reyes (pro hac vice) 1563 Massachusetts Avenue WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP Cambridge, MA 02138 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. (617) 495-4617 (Dershowitz) Washington, D.C. 20005 (617) 495-7855 (facsimile) (202) 434-5000 (617) 495-9170 (Goldsmith) (202) 434-5029 (facsimile) (617) 496-4863 (facsimile) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Mark P. Schnapp, Esq. (Fl. Bar No. 501689) Eliot Pedrosa, Esq. (Fl. Bar No. 182443) GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 (305) 579-0743 (305) 579-0717 (facsimile) [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Defendants Sánchez de Lozada and Dated: July 21, 2008 Sánchez Berzaín Case 1:07-cv-22459-AJ Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 2 of 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 I. PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION IS CONTRADICTED BY THEIR COMPLAINT.................................................................................................................... 2 II. PLAINTIFFS’ POLITICAL QUESTION ANALYSIS IGNORES THE STATE DEPARTMENT’S ACTIONS TO DATE AND MISSTATES THE LAW.......................................................................................................................... 7 III. PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION CONFIRMS THAT THE ACT-OF- STATE DOCTRINE APPLIES HERE......................................................................... 12 IV. DEFENDANTS ARE IMMUNE FROM SUIT............................................................ 14 V. PLAINTIFFS DO NOT SUPPORT THEIR ATS OR TVPA CLAIMS.................... 16 A. Plaintiffs Allege A Disproportionate Force Claim ............................................... 16 B. Plaintiffs Do Not Allege Extrajudicial Killings Under the ATS or TVPA .................................................................................................................... 17 C. Plaintiffs Mischaracterize Payments Received to Date and Fail To Disclose That They Are To Receive Additional Compensation........................... 18 D. Plaintiffs Do Not Allege Crimes Against Humanity. ........................................... 20 E. Plaintiffs’ Count for the Violation of the Rights to Life, Liberty, Security of Person, Association, and Assembly Must Be Dismissed................... 22 F. The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Bars Plaintiffs’ Action. .................. 23 G. Secondary Liability Does Not Attach................................................................... 24 H. Plaintiffs’ State Law Claims Must Also Be Dismissed. ....................................... 24 i Case 1:07-cv-22459-AJ Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 3 of 34 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES 316, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, No. 07cv528, 2008 WL 2157084 (N.D. Fla. May 21, 2008)...........................................................................................................5 Abebe-Jira v. Negewo, 72 F.3d 844 (11th Cir. 1996)......................................................................9 Almog v. Arab Bank, 471 F. Supp. 2d 257 (E.D.N.Y. 2007).........................................................17 American Insurance Association v. Garamendi, 539 U.S. 396 (2003)..........................................25 Arce v. Garcia, 434 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2006)............................................................................24 Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corporation, 488 U.S. 428 (1989) .....................23 Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)....................................................................................... passim Belhas v. Ya’alon, 515 F.3d 1279 (D.C. Cir. 2008).................................................................13, 15 Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955 (2007) .......................................................................4, 5 Boardman Petroleum, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company, 135 F.3d 750 (11th Cir. 1998) .................................................................................................24 Bowoto v. Chevron, No. C 99-02506, 2007 WL 2349343 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007)..................22 Bowoto v. Chevron, No. C 99-02506, 2008 WL 2271600 (N.D. Cal. May 30, 2008) ..................23 Brown v. Hearst Corporation, 54 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 1995).............................................................24 Cabello v. Fernández-Larios, 157 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (S.D. Fla. 2001), aff’d 402 F.3d 1148 (11th Cir. 2005).......................................................................................22 Cabello v. Fernández-Larios, 402 F.3d 1148 (11th Cir. 2005) .....................................................18 Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1019 (W.D. Wash. 2005), aff’d 503 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2007)...............................................................................13, 19, 20 Davis v. Coca-Cola, 516 F.3d 955 (11th Cir. 2008)........................................................................4 Doe I v. Israel, 400 F. Supp. 2d 86 (D.D.C. 2005)..................................................................12, 13 Doe v. Saravia, 348 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (E.D. Cal. 2004)................................................................18 Dole Food v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468 (2003) .......................................................................14, 15 Estate of Ford v. Garcia, 289 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2002) ............................................................24 ii Case 1:07-cv-22459-AJ Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 4 of 34 Estate of Rodriquez v. Drummond Co., 256 F. Supp. 2d 1250 (N.D. Ala. 2003)..........................22 Ferens v. John Deere Co., 494 U.S. 516 (1990)............................................................................25 Herero v. Deutsche Bank, 370 F.3d 1192 (D.C. Cir. 2004)...........................................................16 Hilao v. Marcos, 25 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1994) .............................................................................13 In re Doe, 860 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1988) ...........................................................................................15 In re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, 25 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1994)............................................12, 13 In re Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, 349 F. Supp. 2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).........................15 Jean v. Dorelien, 431 F.3d 776 (11th Cir. 2005)...........................................................................20 Jimenez v. Aristeguieta, 311 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1962) ..................................................................13 Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995)........................................................9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Linder v. Portocarrero, 963 F.2d 332 (11th Cir. 1992).............................................................9, 10 Lizarbe v. Hurtado, CA 07-21783 (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2007).........................................................21 Matar v. Dichter, 500 F. Supp. 2d 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).........................................................12, 13 McMahon v. Presidential Airways, 502 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2007).............................................10 Paul v. Avril, 812 F. Supp. 207 (S.D. Fla. 1993).....................................................................14, 15 Paul v. Avril, 901 F. Supp. 330 (S.D. Fla. 1994)...........................................................................24 Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir. 1988) ..................................................................13 Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc., 226 F.R.D. 456 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) ........21 Saperstein v. Palestinian Authority, No. 1:04-cv-20225, 2006 WL 3804718 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 22, 2006)..........................................................................................................................23 Shaw Family Archives, Ltd. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc., 434 F. Supp. 2d 203 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)......................................................................................24 Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina, 965 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1992) .................................14 Sokolowski v. Flanzer, 769 F.2d 975 (4th Cir. 1985) ....................................................................25 Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004)..................................................................... passim Ungaro-Benages v. Dresdner Bank AG, 379 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2004).................................9, 25 iii Case 1:07-cv-22459-AJ Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 5 of 34 Wiwa v. Dutch Petroleum, 2002 WL