DOCSLIB.ORG

Shabbat-B'shabbato – Parshat Vayeilech (Shuvah) No 1644: 6 Tishrei 5777 (8 October 2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shabbat-B'shabbato – Parshat Vayeilech (Shuvah) No 1644: 6 Tishrei 5777 (8 October 2016) Shabbat-B'Shabbato – Parshat Vayeilech (Shuvah) No 1644: 6 Tishrei 5777 (8 October 2016) AS SHABBAT APPROACHES “I belong to My Lover and My Lover belongs to Me” – Freely-Given Love - by Esti Rosenberg, Head of the Midrasha for Women, Migdal Oz A long journey of three Haftarot of rebuke and seven of consolation ends this Shabbat with the Haftarah “Return Yisrael to your G-d” [Hoshaya 14:2]. The masters of the Tosafot explain: “Three passages of rebuke are read before Tisha B’Av ... and seven of consolation after Tisha B’Av, including two that deal with repentance – Dirshu and Shuva.” [Megillah 31b]. The destruction of the Temple requires us to enter into a process of repentance. The journey of retribution and consolation ends with the subject of repentance. Let us delve more deeply into the two Haftarot that deal with “Teshuva” – repentance. (We will not go into the discussion in the Tosafot about exactly when the two Haftorot are read.) This discussion is based on ideas that I heard from Rabbi Moshe Lichtenstein. The Haftarah “Dirshu – Seek G-d when He is available” [Yeshayahu 55:6] is familiar to many of us from the Mincha prayers of public fast days. It is read during the Ten Days of Awe on the Fast of Gedalia. Yeshayahu tells the nation to seek G-d, and the nation rises enthusiastically to the challenge. Yeshayahu demands, “Seek G-d when He is available, call out to Him when He is close.” The nation responds, “Let the evil one abandon his ways and the sinner his thoughts, and let them return to G-d” [55:7]. Even the Gentiles come close to G-d and repent, and the Holy One, Blessed be He, gives them a place of honor in His house. The hills and mountains break out in song, and there is an active movement of returning to G-d. This excellent movement is a symbol of proper repentance. It was chosen as the Haftarah for public fast days out of a deep understanding that fasting can encourage people to repent. The other Haftarah, “Shuva,” is different. The nation of Yisrael, which has failed by sinning, is called by Hoshaya to repent. This is repentance that is a reaction to distress. “Ashur will not save you, we will not ride on a horse, and we will no longer call our own handiwork god” [Hoshaya 14:4]. It seems that in the time of Hoshaya the nation of Yisrael repents not because of a deep understanding of their sins and their evil thoughts – but rather it is searching for rescue, which does not come from Ashur. Here is what Rashi writes about this verse: “‘I will cure their affliction, I will love them freely” [14:5]. “Because of My good spirit, even though they do not deserve love, I will show my good will to love them, for my anger of them has been reduced.” The Holy One, Blessed be He, will accept the repentance of Yisrael in the time of Hoshaya – not as judgement but rather as an act of kindness. In truth, they will not be worthy of it by merit of their repentance – but in His love, the Holy One, Blessed be He, will agree to accept the repentance of His nation. This is exciting but it is also disappointing. The Holy One, Blessed be He, will act towards Yisrael like the dew. Dew does not have the power or the force of rain, but its strength is seen in its quiet and never-ending dedication to its task. Later we read of repentance of the nation in the time of Yoel. This seemed deeper than what took place in the time of Yeshaya, but it too was motivated by a fear of locusts. At times, Bnei Yisrael repent as the result of a long internal process of abandoning sin, as in “Dirshu.” At other times, the repentance is not at a superior level, and it involves external fears and troubles, as in the case of “Shuva.” 1 The Holy One, Blessed be He, extends His hand to His nation when they repent even when it is not at a superior level but is mixed with human interests. It is exhilarating to see that the sages chose for the Ten Days of Awe the Haftarah “Shuva,” which is at a relatively low level. “Freely-given love.” How refreshing this can be. POINT OF VIEW Repentance of Public Figures - by Rabbi Yisrael Rozen, Dean of the Zomet Institute (1) “Wisdom was asked, what is the punishment of a sinner? And it replied, ‘Sinners will be pursued by evil’ [Mishlei 13:21]. Prophecy was asked, what is the punishment of a sinner? And it replied, ‘A soul which commits a sin must die’ [Yechezkel 18:4]. The Torah was asked, what is the punishment of a sinner? And it replied, let them bring an Asham Sacrifice for atonement. The Holy One, Blessed be He, was asked, what is the punishment of a sinner? And He replied, let him repent and he will be forgiven.” [Pesikta D’Rav Kahane Shuva, 24]. (2) “Seven items were created before the world... Repentance... as is written, ‘Before the mountains were born... And You said, let the people return’ [Tehillim 90:2].” [Pesachim 54a]. (3) “The act (the sin of Batsheva and Uriyah) was not appropriate for David, and the act (the sin of the Golden Calf) was not appropriate for Yisrael... Why did they take place? It is to tell you that an individual who sins is told to learn from an individual (David) and a community which sins is told to learn from a community. This is the declaration of David Ben Yishai, who established the standard for repentance.” [Avoda Zara 4b]. Teshuva – Repentance: Is it Irrational? The concept of teshuva is unique to the Jewish faith, as a kindness of the Holy One, Blessed be He. Only He puts His hand out to accept those who repent, as opposed to wisdom, prophecy, and the Torah (quote 1, above). The Torah proposes a path of atonement: “Let them bring an Asham Sacrifice for atonement.” This is a sacrifice which accompanies an act of repentance with a symbolic act of sprinkling the blood of an animal and burning its flesh. Only the Holy One, Blessed be He, is satisfied with repentance alone, on condition that it is an act of truth, performed with honesty and from the depths of the heart. “Wisdom” and “prophecy” (that is, the intellect and the emotions), as opposed to the Torah, demand strict judgement for violating the sins: “Sinners will be pursued by evil... A soul which commits a sin must die.” In modern terms, we can add other figures of “authority” which are involved with the question of “what to do with a soul which commits a sin.” These modern systems do not recognize the realm of repentance either. For example, the justice system gives only marginal recognition to the concept of repentance, in the framework of extenuating circumstances when setting a sentence. However, “the law is the law,” and misdemeanors and crimes are forbidden. And there is no mechanism to erase the record of sin. One realm that is even more stringent is the “media,” especially of the inferior sort, which does not recognize any possibility of forgiveness. This is especially true in a case of sins by a public figure. The press makes its living from a lack of mercy, by pulling out past sins and quoting them from forgotten sources or collecting them from the “cloud” of the internet. There is absolutely no room in this system for repentance! An Injunction to Forbid Publication When King David admitted “I have sinned” [Shmuel II 12:13] after the affair of Batsheva and Uriyah, he became a symbol of the act of repentance (quote 2, above). And it may surprise us to see that he too encountered a hostile press! According to our tradition (see below), David made two requests: “That my iniquity will not be recorded.” That is, to “delete” the report of his sin. The reply of the Holy One, Blessed be He, was: “That cannot be done!” His second request was that “the rabbis shall not discuss my sins (in 2 the Beit Midrash).” And to this, the Holy One, Blessed be He, replied: I agree! In modern terms: nothing will be erased from the secret protocols, but there is an injunction that prohibits discussing the matter in public! Here is the full quote of this discussion from the Talmud: “David said to the Holy One, Blessed be He: Master of the world: You know very well that if they would tear my flesh no blood would flow. Moreover, when they discussed the matter of the four types of death punishment, they stopped their studies and turned to me, saying, What is the punishment of one who lies with a married woman? I replied to them: One who lies with a married woman is killed by choking, and he still maintains his portion in the world to come, but whoever makes his colleague’s face go white with shame in public has no portion in the world to come. David said to the Holy One, Blessed be He: “Who can understand mistakes” [Tehillim 19:13]. And G-d replied, I accept that (that is, okay!)... Do not let the rabbis discuss my sins. And G-d replied, okay. That my sin should not be recorded. And He replied, ‘That cannot be done.’” [Sanhedrin 107a]. And that indeed is the accepted halacha: “The affairs of David and Amnon are not read in public and are not translated” [Mishna Megillah 4:10].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fighting from the Pulpit: Religious Leaders and Violent Conflict in Israel
    Fighting from the Pulpit: Religious Leaders and Violent Conflict in Israel ∗ Michael Freedman Massachusetts Institute of Technology Revised and Resubmitted at Journal of Conflict Resolution Abstract Religious leaders greatly influence their constituents’ political behavior. Yet, it is un- clear what events trigger nationalist attitudes among religious leaders and why this effect occurs more among some religious leaders rather than others. In this paper, I examine the content of Israeli Rabbinic rhetoric during different military and political conflicts. Drawing on an original collection of Sabbath pamphlets distributed to Syna- gogues, I demonstrate that religious rhetoric is highly responsive to levels of violence for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I find that religious rhetoric and tone are more nation- alist during conflict with the Palestinians, and that this effect is mediated by religious ideologies towards the state. In contrast, religious rhetoric does not respond to military conflict in Lebanon or other internal Israeli political conflicts. These findings highlight under what conditions religious leaders infuse conflict with a religious tone, arguably making it harder to gain support for political compromise among the religious public. Word Count: 10,120 ∗I thank Fotini Christia, Rich Nielsen, and Guy Grossman for their valuable guidance and comments on this paper. I also received valuable comments from Nadav Shelef, David Singer, In Song Kim, Elizabeth Dekeyser, Reid Pauly, and Yair Fogel-Dror. I also benefited from feedback received during the 2015 Ronald Coase Workshop and the MPSA 2016 conference. I received support for the project from the Israel Institute. 1 1 Introduction Ample evidence exists that citizens take cues from religious leaders when forming opinions about salient political issues (Grzymala-Busse, 2012; Djupe and Calfano, 2013; Masoud, Jamal and Nugent, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Etzionupdate from Yeshivat Har Etzion
    בסד Summer 5777/2017 etzionUPDATE from Yeshivat Har Etzion Etzion Foundation Dinner 2017 On Wednesday March 29, hundreds of when Racheli delivered words of thanks The dinner culminated with dancing, friends gathered for the annual Etzion and chizuk. All the honorees appeared in bringing together all the members of the Foundation Dinner. The Foundation was a video presentation that also featured Gush community – Ramim and alumni, proud to present the Alumnus of the Year Roshei Yeshiva, Ramim, peers, children parents and children all rejoicing arm in award to Rabbi Jeffrey Kobrin ’92PC and and talmidim. The videos can be viewed at arm. Yair Hindin ‘98 commented, “It‘s this Michelle Greenberg-Kobrin. Simcha and http://haretzion.org/2017-honorees sense of community that always pulses Barbara Hochman, parents of Ayelet ’11MO through the Grand Hyatt during the Gush Rosh Yeshiva Rav Mosheh Lichtenstein and Ariel ’13, were honored with the dinner, this sense of the common bonds we spoke nostalgically and passionately of Parents of the Year award. all share, that keeps me coming back year the early days of his family’s aliyah and after year.” The Dor l’Dor Award was given to the state of the Yeshiva upon their arrival. Rav Danny Rhein his daughter, Describing the present, he noted the near Before the dinner, a reception was held Racheli (Rhein) Schmell ’07MO, whose impossibility of imagining not only the honoring the alumni of ’96 and ’97 on their combined warmth exponentially impacts current success of Gush but also the ever- 20th anniversary. In honor of the occasion, the tone and flavor of both Yeshivat Har growing presence that Migdal Oz has on the students from those years formed Etzion and Migdal Oz.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Learning Programs
    Weekly Gemara Shiur Zichron Gedaliah Bais Medrash Program Rabbi Avrom Landesman 2012 Wednesday Nights, 8:30- 9:30 pm Tuesday Evenings at 8:00 pm YISE Bais Medrash Fairfax Kollel 1132 Arcola Avenue Community Wednesday Nights, 7:45-9:00 pm Session Dates Congregation Ahavat Israel 5772 Winter November 1–March 27 Learning 5772 Summer April 24–June 26 3939 Prince William Drive 5772 Elul August 28–September 11 Fairfax, VA 22031 5773 Winter Starts October 16 Jointly run with Chabad Lubavitch of Northern Virginia Programs For men and women Classes and Instructors Machshava [Jewish Thought] by Rabbi Y. Scher Classes and Instructors of the Gemara Sukkah by R. J. Cohen Gemara by Rabbi Akiva Leiman Mishna Berurah by Rabbi Eli Reingold Book of Samuel and Jewish Topics by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Blate Advanced Gemara Beitzah by Rabbi M.C. Blate Book of Shoftim(for women only) by Mrs. Esti Teitelbaum Chavrusas always available See website http://www.fairfaxkollel.org Special Sessions The Yeshiva of Greater Washington’s Community YISE Belenofsky Sanctuary Learning Program continues the long tradition For men and women February 28 Rabbi Aaron Lopiansky, Purim of high quality Torah education established by March 20 Rabbi Eli Reingold, Pesach: What Do We Tell the our founder HaRav Gedaliah Anemer, zt”l, for Children, Part II May 22 Rabbi Aaron Lopiansky, Shavuos All shuirim take place at the Boys Campus, the Greater Washington community. The Kollel June 26 Rabbi Aaron Lopiansky, Approaching the Three Weeks 1216 Arcola Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, Zichron Amram and the staff of the Yeshiva host or August 28 Rabbi Aaron Lopiansky, Yamim Noraim unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Loving the Convert Prior to a Completed Conversion: with a Test Case Application of Inviting Conversion Candidates to Pesach Seder and Yom Tov Meals
    147 Loving the Convert Prior to a Completed Conversion: With a Test Case Application of Inviting Conversion Candidates to Pesach Seder and Yom Tov Meals By: MICHAEL J. BROYDE and BENJAMIN J. SAMUELS Introduction The Torah enjoins us numerous times concerning the mitzvah of Ahavat ha-Ger,1 which literally means the love of the stranger or sojourner, though is primarily understood in Jewish legal sources to refer more specifically to loving the convert to Judaism.2 Furthermore, the Torah commands us that “you shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18), and also charges us to love God (Deuteronomy 6:4), creating multiple duties of love as halakhic obligations. This article will explore the question: When does the duty to love the convert commence and does it impact the con- version process? Does it apply only to a newly converted Jew, or to a Noahide who is in the process of converting, or even to a Gentile who has expressed an interest in converting? The process of conversion to Judaism can be divided into three fun- damental stages: In the first stage, the person makes a personal decision 1 See Leviticus 19:34; Deuteronomy 10:18-19. The Torah also prohibits oppress- ing the convert, “lo toneh” and “Lo tonu”—see Exodus 22:20; Leviticus 19:33; TB Bava Metzia 58b, 59b, and Ben Zion Katz, “Don’t Oppress the Ger,” Seforim Blog <https://seforimblog.com/2019/07/dont-oppress-the-ger/>. However, this article will not investigate the question of when the prohibition against oppressing a convert begins, which may or may not track in parallel with the mitzvah of Ahavat ha-Ger.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassidus on the Chassidus on the Parsha +
    LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) VA’ES CHA NAN _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah Deciphered Messages The Torah tells us ( Shemos 19:19) that when the Jewish people gathered at Mount Sinai to receive the Torah , “Moshe spoke and Hashem answered him with a voice.” The Gemora (Berochos 45a) der ives from this pasuk the principle that that an interpreter should not speak more loudly than the reader whose words he is translating. Tosafos immediately ask the obvious question: from that pasuk we see actually see the opposite: that the reader should n ot speak more loudly than the interpreter. We know, says Rav Levi Yitzchok, that Moshe’s nevua (prophecy) was different from that of the other nevi’im (prophets) in that “the Shechina was speaking through Moshe’s throat”. This means that the interpretation of the nevuos of the other nevi’im is not dependent on the comprehension of the people who hear it. The nevua arrives in this world in the mind of the novi and passes through the filter of his perspectives. The resulting message is the essence of the nevua. When Moshe prophesied, however, it was as if the Shechina spoke from his throat directly to all the people on their particular level of understanding. Consequently, his nevuos were directly accessible to all people. In this sense then, Moshe was the rea der of the nevua , and Hashem was the interpreter.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones in Jewish Medical Ethics: Medical
    Milestones in Jewish Medical Ethics Medical-Halachic Literature in Israel, 1948-1998 Mordechai Halperin, M.D. Main Chapters A. Definition of Concepts E. Third Decade 1. Introduction 1. The Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for 2. Medical Ethics Medical-Halachic Research 3. Jewish Medical Ethics 2. Assia 4. Medicine and Jewish Law 3. Moriah 5. Medicine and Halalcha 4. Mahanayim 6. Medicine & Judaism 5. Pathology and the Talmud 6. Lev Avraham B. Medical Halachic Literature: 7. Other Publications Ancient Times 1. From the Biblical Period through F. Fourth Decade the Eighteenth Century 1. Nishmat Avraham 2. From the Early Nineteenth Century 2. The Medical-Halachic Encyclopedia until the Establishment of the (Hebrew Edition) State of Israel 3. The Foundations of the Law Act - 3. Fifty Years of Statehood 1980 4. Judge Amnon Carmi and The Society C. First Decade for Medicine and Law in Israel 1. The Chief Rabbis: Rabbi Isaac 5. Technological Halachic Institutes Hertzog and Rabbi Ben-Tsiyyon 6. Additional Publications Meir Hai Uziel 7. The Jacobovits Center 2. Ha-Torah ve-Ha-Mdinah for Jewish Medical Ethics 3. Tsits Eli‘ezer 8. Special Lectures for Physicians 4. No‘am: Platform for Clarification of Halachic Problems G. Fifth Decade 5. Other Authorities 1. International Conferences in America and Israel D. Second Decade 2. Jewish Medical Ethics (JME) 1. First Bestseller: Shemirat Shabbat 3. Multimedia Halacha and Medicine ke-Hilchata 4. Precedents in Medicine and Law 2. Jewish Medical Ethics 5. Yael Shefer vs. The State of Israel 3. Tora She-be‘al Peh and Ha-Ma‘ayan 6. The Value of The State of Israel and The Patient Rights Act 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing the Israeli Home from Syria February 23, 2021 Rabbi Elie Weinstock
    Bringing the Israeli Home from Syria February 23, 2021 Rabbi Elie Weinstock Israel announces Russian-brokered prisoner swap with Syria Little is known about why the woman entered Syria. Israeli media have said she is a former resident of an ultra-Orthodox West Bank settlement, but she has not been publicly identified. Syrian media said she accidentally entered Syrian territory after crossing from the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights. Official Syrian media first reported the emerging deal on Wednesday, saying that two Syrians were to be exchanged for the Israeli woman. The two Syrians were identified as Nihal al-Makt, who had been under house arrest in her village in the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights, and Ziyab Qahmouz, detained in 2016 and serving 14 years in Israeli jails. But the deal ran into complications after al-Makt and Qahmouz, who are both from the Golan, refused to be transferred to Syria…Syria’s SANA said late Thursday that two more Syrians — apparently the two shepherds — returned home to their villages in Quneitra province. AP News 2/28/21 Russia brokers unusual prisoner exchange between Israel and Syria But then there was a snag. One of the prisoners said he would rather remain in an Israeli prison for the 14 years left in his term than be deported to Syria, the Israeli officials say. However, Israeli soldiers had already been sent to the buffer zone between Israel and Syria in search of bargaining chips. They had waited for two shepherds to cross into an Israeli enclave and captured them. Barak Ravid, Axios 2/18/21 Israel Dodges Questions Over Vaccine-for-Prisoner Swap With Syria Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has sidestepped questions over whether his country agreed to pay Russia to provide coronavirus vaccines to Syria as a part of a prisoner swap between the two Middle Eastern countries…“I want to say that not even one Israeli vaccine went for this thing,” said Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Jointorah Education Revolution
    the JOIN TORAH EDUCATION REVOLUTION Afikei Torah • Ahavas Torah • Ahava V'achva • Aish HaTorah of Cleveland • Aish HaTorah of Denver • Aish HaTorah of Detroit • Aish HaTorah of Jerusalem • Aish HaTorah of Mexico • Aish HaTorah of NY • Aish HaTorah of Philadelphia • Aish HaTorah of St Louis • Aish HaTorah of Thornhill • Ateres Yerushalayim • Atlanta Scholars Kollel • AZ Russian Programs • Bais Yaakov of Boston • Bais Yaakov of LA • Bar Ilan University • Batya Girls / Torah Links • Bay Shore Jewish Center Be'er Miriam • Belmont Synagogue • Beth Din • Beth Jacob • Beth Jacob Congregation • Beth Tfiloh Upper School Library • Bnei Shalom Borehamwood & • Elstree Synagogue • Boston's Jewish Community Day School • Brandywine Hills Minyan • Calabasas Shul • Camp Bnos Agudah • Chabad at the Beaches • Chabad Chabad of Montreal • Chai Center of West Bay • Chaye Congregation Ahavat Israel Chabad Impact of Torah Live Congregation Beth Jacob of Irvine • Congregation Light of Israel Congregation Derech (Ohr Samayach) Organizations that have used Etz Chaim Center for Jewish Studies Hampstead Garden Suburb Synagogue • Torah Live materials Jewish Community Day Jewish FED of Greater Atlanta / Congregation Ariel • Jewish 600 Keneseth Beth King David Linksfield Primary and High schools • King 500 Mabat • Mathilda Marks Kennedy Jewish Primary School • Me’or 400 Menorah Shul • Meor Midreshet Rachel v'Chaya 206 MTA • Naima Neve Yerushalayim • 106 Ohab Zedek • Ohr Pninim Seminary • 77 Rabbi Reisman Yarchei Kalla • Rabbi 46 Shapell's College • St. John's Wood Synagogue • The 14 Tiferes High Machon Shlomo 1 Me’or HaTorah Meor • Me'or Midreshet Rachel v'Chaya College • Naima Neve Yerushalayim • Ohab Zedek • Ohr Pninim Seminary • Rabbi Reisman Yarchei Kalla • Rabbi 2011 2014 2016 2010 2015 2013 2012 2008 2009 Shapell's College St.
    [Show full text]
  • JCT Develops Solutions to Environmental Problems P.O.BOX 16031, JERUSALEM 91160 ISRAEL 91160 JERUSALEM 16031, P.O.BOX
    NISSAN 5768 / APRIL 2008, VOL. 13 Green and Clean JCT Develops Solutions to Environmental Problems P.O.BOX 16031, JERUSALEM 91160 ISRAEL 91160 JERUSALEM 16031, P.O.BOX NISSAN 5768 / APRIL 2008, VOL. 13 Green and Clean JCT Develops Solutions to Environmental Problems P.O.BOX 16031, JERUSALEM 91160 ISRAEL 91160 JERUSALEM 16031, P.O.BOX COMMENTARY JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY PRESIDENT Shalom! opportunity to receive an excellent education Prof. Joseph S. Bodenheimer allowing them to become highly-skilled, ROSH HAYESHIVA Rabbi Z. N. Goldberg Of the many things sought after professionals. More important ROSH BEIT HAMIDRASH we are proud at JCT, for our students is the opportunity available Rabbi Natan Bar Chaim nothing is more RECTOR at the College to receive an education Prof. Joseph M. Steiner prized than our focusing on Jewish values. It is this DIRECTOR-GENERAL students. In every education towards values that has always Dr. Shimon Weiss VICE PRESIDENT FOR DEVELOPMENT issue of “Perspective” been the hallmark of JCT and it is this AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS we profile one of our students as a way of commitment to Jewish ethical values that Reuven Surkis showing who they are and of sharing their forms the foundation from which Israeli accomplishments with you. society will grow and flourish - and our EDITORS Our student body of 2,500 is a students and graduates take pride in being Rosalind Elbaum, Debbie Ross, Penina Pfeuffer microcosm of Israeli society: 21% are Olim committed to this process. DESIGN & PRODUCTION (immigrants) from the former Soviet Union, As we approach the Pesach holiday, the Studio Fisher Ethiopia, South America, North America, 60th anniversary of the State of Israel and JCT Perspective invites the submission of arti- Europe, Australia and South Africa, whilst the 40th anniversary of JCT, let us reaffirm cles and press releases from the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Theology World Religions
    An offprint from JEWISH THEOLOGY AND WORLD RELIGIONS N Edited by alon goshen-gottstein and eugene korn This material is copyright-protected and may not be be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the author of the article, the editor of the volume in which it was originally published, and the publisher of the volume. Any requests for permission to use this material in whole or in part should be addressed in the first instance to the Littman Library at <[email protected]>, and all such requests should include details of the precise use intended. Oxford · Portland, Oregon The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization 2012 The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization Chief Executive Officer: Ludo Craddock Managing Editor: Connie Webber PO Box 645 , Oxford OX 2 0 UJ , UK www.littman.co.uk ——— Published in the United States and Canada by The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization c/o ISBS, 920 NE 58 th Avenue, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97213 -3786 © The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress cataloging-in-publication data Jewish theology and world religions / edited by Alon Goshen-Gottstein and Eugene Korn. p. cm. – (The Littman library of Jewish civilization) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Judaism–Relations. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 5TJT 010314.Indd
    B’Lev Ari . See Page 28 Acu-Zen . .See Page 41 Gurwin . See Page 42 Our Place . See Page 49 Yaffa Wigs . See Page 53 I-4 Tours . See Page 63 See Page 23 See Pages 3-5 Serving Nassau County, Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Bronx, and Staten Island JANUARY 3, 2014 פרשת בא WWW.5TJT.COM VOL. 14 NO. 17 2 SHEVAT 5774 $1.00 White House: No On Pollard FROM THE EDITOR See Page 71 BY LARRY GORDON Values And Justice From here it looks like offi- cial Israel has gone mad. The release of 26 more convicted See Page 39 Arab terrorists this week has reopened wounds, which had never really closed, for Haim Tzah, GPO GPO Tzah, Haim Tzah, bereaved families who live with the awful pain of their MKs Nachman Shai, Ayelet Shaked, and Efi Lahav presented President Shimon Peres with a petition signed by 106 members of Knesset calling on President Obama to release Jonathan Pollard. See Page 22 Continued on Page 14 See Page 14 Tekhelet Conference: HEARD IN THE BAGEL STORE A Royal Blue Event With BY LARRY GORDON A New Discovery The Protest That Wasn’t Segal Eli Segal See Page 9 BY TOBY KLEIN Frankly I don’t get it. Plane- GREENWALD loads of chareidim who reside mostly in Jerusalem planned on The exploration to fi nd the arriving in New York this week genuine hilazon—the snail to demonstrate against the gov- that produces the tekhelet ernment of Israel for wanting to that was worn by the Kohen institute some drastic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity and Shabbat
    5778 - bpipn mdxa` [email protected] 1 c‡qa HALACHIC AND HASHKAFIC ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 88 - ELECTRICITY & SHABBAT: PART 2 - MICROPHONES OU ISRAEL CENTER - SPRING 2018 A] THE HISTORICAL DEBATE 1878 Carbon microphone invented in the US. 1920 Significant development of microphone technology. 1940s R. Simcha Levy and the Halacha Commission for the RCA publish a decision permitting certain microphones on Shabbat and Yom Tov. 1951 Agudas HaRabbonim in the US issued a ruling prohibiting all use of microphones on Shabbat. 1954 Rav Soloveitchik spoke at the RCA conference against the use of microphones on Shabbat.1 c1970 Chief Rabbi of Israel, R. Isser Yehudah Unterman issued a psak permitting a use of a microphone on Shabbat within very specific guidelines.2 Rav Shaul Yisraeli3 issued a psak permitting certain microphones on Shabbat. c1995 Rav Yisrael Rozen of Zomet created the Zomet microphone. 1. SHABBAT MICROPHONES CATCHING ON AMONG ORTHODOX DESPITE TABOOS Jerusalem Post, May 5 2015 Ten years ago, the overflow crowd during the height of the summer season at Rabbi Marc Schneier’s synagogue in Westhampton Beach, New York, was so large it had to be housed in tents on the lawn outside. Acoustics were terrible, if not nonexistent, and many congregants decided to cease attending services because they felt disconnected from the activity inside. Turning to then-Israeli Chief Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau and former Haifa Chief Rabbi She’ar Yashuv Cohen, Schneier was referred to Yisrael Rozen, a national-religious rabbi whose Zomet Institute in Alon Shvut had developed a Halacha- friendly sound system. Microphones, like the issue of separation of the sexes during prayers, had long been one of the dividing lines between Orthodox and Conservative congregations, with traditionalists shunning the technology as a violation of the legal norms regulating Shabbat observance.
    [Show full text]