DOCSLIB.ORG

Seed Dispersal and Population Genetic Variation in the Context Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seed Dispersal and Population Genetic Variation in the Context Of Seed dispersal and population genetic variation in the context of fire A case study on two plant species in fire-prone mallee in South Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY from FLINDERS UNIVERSITY by Bianca Dunker, MSc SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES August 2015 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. V CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................................. VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. VIII PREFACE ................................................................................................................................ X CHAPTER ONE ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction - Fire and the importance of seed dispersal for population connectivity 1.1 Fire in the Australian ecosystem as a natural occurrence .............................................. 2 1.2 Fire in Australian ecosystems as a management tool ..................................................... 2 1.3 Fire regime changes and their potential effect on biotas ................................................ 3 1.4 Importance of dispersal .................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Parameters that influence seed dispersal distances by wind .......................................... 6 1.6 Population genetics in fire-prone vegetation ................................................................. 8 1.7 Aim of this study ............................................................................................................ 9 1.8 Study system and species ............................................................................................... 9 1.8.1 Study system and its past and present fire regimes ................................................. 9 1.8.2 Ecology and dispersal features Triodia ................................................................. 12 1.8.3 Ecology and dispersal features Callitris verrucosa .............................................. 14 1.9 Thesis outline ............................................................................................................... 16 1.10 References .................................................................................................................. 17 CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................... 24 A comprehensive approach to assess seed dispersal of two plant species in mallee 2.1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 26 2.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 28 2.3 Material and methods ................................................................................................... 31 2.3.1 Study region .......................................................................................................... 31 2.3.2 Ecology of study species ....................................................................................... 31 2.3.3 Direct tracking of seed dispersal ........................................................................... 33 2.3.4 Mechanistic seed dispersal .................................................................................... 36 2.3.5 Indirect genetic estimate of dispersal .................................................................... 38 2.4. Analysis....................................................................................................................... 39 2.5 Results .......................................................................................................................... 41 I 2.5.1 Triodia irritans ...................................................................................................... 41 2.5.2 Callitris verrucosa ................................................................................................ 44 2.6 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 47 2.6.1 Triodia irritans ...................................................................................................... 48 2.6.2 Callitris verrucosa ................................................................................................ 49 2.6.3 Direct tracking ...................................................................................................... 50 2.6.4 Mechanistic model ................................................................................................ 50 2.6.5 Genetics ................................................................................................................. 51 2.6.6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 52 2.7 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 52 2.8 References .................................................................................................................... 53 2.9 Supplementary Materials: ............................................................................................ 58 CHAPTER THREE ............................................................................................................... 59 Exploring population genetic diversity and structure of Triodia irritans under various fire regimes 3.1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 61 3.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 62 3.3 Methods........................................................................................................................ 66 3.3.1 Study region .......................................................................................................... 66 3.3.2 The study species .................................................................................................. 67 3.3.3 Data collection ...................................................................................................... 68 3.3.4 Microsatellites ....................................................................................................... 70 3.3.5 Plant characteristics............................................................................................... 72 3.3.6 Microsatellite loci and estimation of ploidy .......................................................... 72 3.3.7 Genetic Diversity and clonality ............................................................................. 73 3.3.8 Spatial genetic structure ........................................................................................ 73 3.4 Results .......................................................................................................................... 74 3.4.1 Plant characteristics............................................................................................... 74 3.4.2 Estimation of ploidy .............................................................................................. 76 3.4.3 Genetic diversity and clonality ............................................................................. 76 3.4.4 Spatial Genetic Structure ...................................................................................... 78 3.5 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 83 3.6 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 86 3.7 References .................................................................................................................... 87 3.8 Supplementary Materials: ............................................................................................ 92 II CHAPTER FOUR .................................................................................................................. 93 Low genetic diversity of Callitris verrucosa in mallee vegetation 4.1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 95 4.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 96 4.3 Material and methods ................................................................................................... 99 4.3.1 Study region .......................................................................................................... 99 4.3.2 Study species ......................................................................................................... 99 4.3.3 Sample collection ................................................................................................ 100 4.3.4 Genetics ............................................................................................................... 101 4.3.5 Data analyses
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sect. Phyllodineae), a New Species from Eyre Peninsula, South Australia M.C
    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 20: 17-20 (2002) ACACIA TOONDULYA (LEGUMINOSAE: MIMOSOIDEAE: SECT. PHYLLODINEAE), A NEW SPECIES FROM EYRE PENINSULA, SOUTH AUSTRALIA M.C. O'Leary State Herbarium of South Australia, Plant Biodiversity Centre PO Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 Email: [email protected] Abstract A new species, Acacia toondulya, is described and illustrated. It has a restricted distribution in the western Gawler Ranges, Eyre Peninsula, South Australia and is most closely related to A. notabilis. Introduction The taxon described here as A. toondulya was first collected in 1969, and again in 1972. These specimens were identified as A. beckleri and A. notabilis due to their large phyllodes and flowers, or pods with transverse seed. A specimen collected from Toondulya Bluff in 1981 with a distinct pruinose coating on its branchlets and racemes (but in young bud) at first remained undetermined for some time and then finally identified as A. cretacea. At this time a study of the biology of A. cretacea was being conducted by the Conservation Biology Unit at the Black Hill Flora Park, and with earlier reports of populations of A. cretacea occurring in the Gawler Ranges a visit was made to Toondulya Bluff. The resulting collections made with inflorescences containing 80 flowers per head, pods with transverse seed, and photos showing a slender, erect habit, indicated all the previous determinations to be incorrect. This relatively inaccessible and poorly collected area was then visited by the author, where population collections and field studies have shown this taxon to be worthy of formal species ranking.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Grasses Make New Products – a Review of Current and Past Uses and Assessment of Potential
    Native grasses make new products – a review of current and past uses and assessment of potential JUNE 2015 RIRDC Publication No. 15/056 Native grasses make new products A review of current and past uses and assessment of potential by Ian Chivers, Richard Warrick, Janet Bornman and Chris Evans June 2015 RIRDC Publication No 15/056 RIRDC Project No PRJ-009569 © 2015 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-802-9 ISSN 1440-6845 Native grasses make new products: a review of current and past uses and assessment of potential Publication No. 15/056 Project No. PRJ-009569 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLISHED VERSION Manfred Jusaitis Reinforcement of a Population of Chalky Wattle on Eyre Peninsula, South Australia Global Re-I
    PUBLISHED VERSION Manfred Jusaitis Reinforcement of a population of chalky wattle on Eyre Peninsula, South Australia Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2016. Case-studies from around the globe, 2016 / Soorae, P.S. (ed./s), pp.246-251 © 2016 International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. PERMISSIONS As per publication: © 2016 International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. 24 March 2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/98062 Plants Reinforcement of a population of chalky wattle on Eyre Peninsula, South Australia Manfred Jusaitis Senior Biologist, South Australian Seed Conservation Centre, BotaniC Gardens of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia; Affiliate Senior Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia [email protected] Introduction The chalky wattle (Acacia cretacea Maslin & Whibley, Leguminosae) is a spindly, usually single-stemmed small tree with an open, straggly crown and chalky-white branchlets, inflorescences and legumes. The plant proliferates both from seed and vegetatively by root suckering or basal regrowth following disturbance or injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park June 2011
    Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park June 2011 Eucalyptus socialis subsp. socialis / Eucalyptus leptophylla mid mallee woodland with Triodia irritans hummock grass understratum, Brookfield Conservation Park Acknowledgements TERN gratefully acknowledges the South Australian Department of Environment and Water for their assistance and support during the project and for allowing access to the park. Thanks also to the many volunteers who helped to collect, curate and process the data and samples. Lastly, many thanks to staff from the South Australian Herbarium for undertaking the plant identifications. Citation: TERN (2020) Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park, June 2011. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide. Contents Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park ........................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Accessing the Data ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Duplications and Genomic Conflict Underlie Major Pulses of Phenotypic 2 Evolution in Gymnosperms 3 4 Gregory W
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.13.435279; this version posted March 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 Gene duplications and genomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic 2 evolution in gymnosperms 3 4 Gregory W. Stull1,2,†, Xiao-Jian Qu3,†, Caroline Parins-Fukuchi4, Ying-Ying Yang1, Jun-Bo 5 Yang2, Zhi-Yun Yang2, Yi Hu5, Hong Ma5, Pamela S. Soltis6, Douglas E. Soltis6,7, De-Zhu Li1,2,*, 6 Stephen A. Smith8,*, Ting-Shuang Yi1,2,*. 7 8 1Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 9 Kunming, Yunnan, China. 10 2CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of 11 Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. 12 3Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Sciences, 13 Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 14 4Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 15 5Department of Biology, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 16 University Park, PA, USA. 17 6Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 18 7Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 19 8Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 20 MI, USA. 21 †Co-first author. 22 *Correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Portraits
    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 7(3): 307-313 (1985) PLANT PORTRAITS 17. Acacia araneosa Whibley (Leguminosae) Acacia araneosa Whibley, Contrib. Herb. Aust. 14: 1 (1976); Acacias of South Australia 94 (1980). Illustration: Based on fresh material preserved under Whibley 9687 from a plant grown in the Mallee section of the Adelaide Botanic Gardens. Small erect wispy trees 3-8 m high; trunks slender 4-7 cm in diameter, solitary or dividing at about 1 m above ground level. Branches smooth, flexuose towards their apices; bark smooth, a grey reddish brown on juvenile branches. Phyllodes slender, terete, 18-35 cm or sometimes up to 69 cm long, 1-1.8 mm in diameter, becoming almost tetragonous when dry, obscurely 4-nerved, glabrous, light green, sometime scurfy, tapered at the apex into a non-pungent point. Glands small, orbicular and situated near the base of the phyllode. Inflorescence axillary racemes which become paniculate at the ends of branches due to phyllode reduction; racemes with 5-9 sparsely arranged heads; flower heads yellow, compact globose with 50-70 flowers; petal 5, free, sparsely golden hairy on the acute tips. Legumes stipitate, linear, straight or slightly curved, 6-14.5 cm long, 4-6 mm broad, coriaceous, undulate, glabrous, olive green, becoming brown when mature; margins prominent, nerve-like and somewhat constricted between seeds. Seeds longitudinal or slightly oblique in legume; funicle a yellow reddish brown, extending c. three-quarters around the seeds and terminating in a yellowish clavate aril. Acacia araneosa occurs in a small area of the northern Flinders Range from Balcanoona along the range into the Arkaroola Sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    The Pastoral History, Biological and Cultural Signifi cance of the Scotia Country, far Western New South Wales MARTIN WESTBROOKE Centre for Environmental Management, University of Ballarat, Mt Helen, Victoria 3353 ([email protected]) Published on 28 August 2012 at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN Westbrooke, M. (2012). The pastoral history, biological and cultural signifi cance of the Scotia Country, far western New South Wales. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 134, A55-A68. The Scotia country of far western New South Wales, once part of the vast Lake Victoria lease and subsequently split into six smaller properties after WW1, has one of the shortest grazing histories in the state. The low stocking rates due to unsuitable feed provided by the mallee vegetation and limited water supplies have left native vegetation communities relatively intact and close to original condition. A natural salt lake system with rare plants and plant communities adds to the values of the area. This paper reviews the pastoral history of the area and the features which make the Scotia of outstanding conservation and cultural signifi cance. Manuscript received 19 October 2011, accepted for publication 11 January 2012. KEYWORDS: conservation, cultural, mallee, pastoral lease, plant communities, Scotia. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SCOTIA BLOCKS The Scotia country of approximately 200,000ha is located in far western New South Wales mid- The Scotia blocks (see Table 1) are located in far way between Wentworth and Broken Hill, latitude south western New South Wales to the west of the 33o43’S, longitude 143o02’E (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee South Australia
    A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE MURRAY MALLEE SOUTH AUSTRALIA Editors J. N. Foulkes J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2000 The Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia was carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Programs and the State Government of South Australia. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Australian Heritage Commission or the State Government of South Australia. This report may be cited as: Foulkes, J. N. and Gillen, J. S. (Eds.) (2000). A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia (Biological Survey and Research, Department for Environment and Heritage and Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Environment Australia Department for Human Services, Housing, GPO Box 636 or Environment and Planning Library CANBERRA ACT 2601 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 EDITORS J. N. Foulkes and J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 AUTHORS D. M. Armstrong, J. N. Foulkes, Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001. S. Carruthers, F. Smith, S. Kinnear, Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Planning SA, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, GPO Box 1815, ADELAIDE SA 5001.
    [Show full text]
  • Aridity Drove the Evolution of Extreme Embolism Resistance and The
    Aridity drove the evolution of extreme embolism resistance and the radiation of conifer genus Callitris Maximilian Larter, Sebastian Pfautsch, Jean-Christophe Domec, Santiago Trueba, Nathalie Nagalingum, Sylvain Delzon To cite this version: Maximilian Larter, Sebastian Pfautsch, Jean-Christophe Domec, Santiago Trueba, Nathalie Na- galingum, et al.. Aridity drove the evolution of extreme embolism resistance and the radiation of conifer genus Callitris. New Phytologist, Wiley, 2017, 215 (1), pp.97-112. 10.1111/nph.14545. hal-01606790 HAL Id: hal-01606790 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01606790 Submitted on 19 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License Research Aridity drove the evolution of extreme embolism resistance and the radiation of conifer genus Callitris Maximilian Larter1, Sebastian Pfautsch2, Jean-Christophe Domec3,4, Santiago Trueba5,6, Nathalie Nagalingum7 and Sylvain Delzon1 1BIOGECO, INRA, Univ. Bordeaux, Pessac 33610, France; 2Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; 3Bordeaux Sciences AGRO, UMR 1391 ISPA INRA, 1 Cours du General de Gaulle, Gradignan Cedex 33175, France; 4Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; 5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA, 621 Charles E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae)
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2010) 580–598 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A classification of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae) based on multi-gene phylogenetic trees Paul M. Peterson a,*, Konstantin Romaschenko a,b, Gabriel Johnson c a Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA b Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSICÀICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s.n., 08038 Barcelona, Spain c Department of Botany and Laboratories of Analytical Biology, Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, MD 20746, USA article info abstract Article history: We conducted a molecular phylogenetic study of the subfamily Chloridoideae using six plastid DNA Received 29 July 2009 sequences (ndhA intron, ndhF, rps16-trnK, rps16 intron, rps3, and rpl32-trnL) and a single nuclear ITS Revised 31 December 2009 DNA sequence. Our large original data set includes 246 species (17.3%) representing 95 genera (66%) Accepted 19 January 2010 of the grasses currently placed in the Chloridoideae. The maximum likelihood and Bayesian analysis of Available online 22 January 2010 DNA sequences provides strong support for the monophyly of the Chloridoideae; followed by, in order of divergence: a Triraphideae clade with Neyraudia sister to Triraphis; an Eragrostideae clade with the Keywords: Cotteinae (includes Cottea and Enneapogon) sister to the Uniolinae (includes Entoplocamia, Tetrachne, Biogeography and Uniola), and a terminal Eragrostidinae clade of Ectrosia, Harpachne, and Psammagrostis embedded Classification Chloridoideae in a polyphyletic Eragrostis; a Zoysieae clade with Urochondra sister to a Zoysiinae (Zoysia) clade, and a Grasses terminal Sporobolinae clade that includes Spartina, Calamovilfa, Pogoneura, and Crypsis embedded in a Molecular systematics polyphyletic Sporobolus; and a very large terminal Cynodonteae clade that includes 13 monophyletic sub- Phylogenetic trees tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Cavitation Resistance in Conifers Maximilian Larter
    The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian Larter To cite this version: Maximilian Larter. The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers. Bioclimatology. Univer- sit´ede Bordeaux, 2016. English. <NNT : 2016BORD0103>. <tel-01375936> HAL Id: tel-01375936 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01375936 Submitted on 3 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. THESE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITE DE BORDEAUX Spécialité : Ecologie évolutive, fonctionnelle et des communautés Ecole doctorale: Sciences et Environnements Evolution de la résistance à la cavitation chez les conifères The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian LARTER Directeur : Sylvain DELZON (DR INRA) Co-Directeur : Jean-Christophe DOMEC (Professeur, BSA) Soutenue le 22/07/2016 Devant le jury composé de : Rapporteurs : Mme Amy ZANNE, Prof., George Washington University Mr Jordi MARTINEZ VILALTA, Prof., Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Examinateurs : Mme Lisa WINGATE, CR INRA, UMR ISPA, Bordeaux Mr Jérôme CHAVE, DR CNRS, UMR EDB, Toulouse i ii Abstract Title: The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Abstract Forests worldwide are at increased risk of widespread mortality due to intense drought under current and future climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny and Classification of the Cynodonteae
    TAXON 65 (6) • December 2016: 1263–1287 Peterson & al. • Phylogeny and classification of the Cynodonteae A molecular phylogeny and classification of the Cynodonteae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae) with four new genera: Orthacanthus, Triplasiella, Tripogonella, and Zaqiqah; three new subtribes: Dactylocteniinae, Orininae, and Zaqiqahinae; and a subgeneric classification of Distichlis Paul M. Peterson,1 Konstantin Romaschenko,1,2 & Yolanda Herrera Arrieta3 1 Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, U.S.A. 2 M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences, Kiev 01601, Ukraine 3 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA, Durango, C.P. 34220, Mexico Author for correspondence: Paul M. Peterson, [email protected] ORCID PMP, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-5528; KR, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-4193 DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/656.4 Abstract Morphologically, the tribe Cynodonteae is a diverse group of grasses containing about 839 species in 96 genera and 18 subtribes, found primarily in Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Americas. Because the classification of these genera and spe­ cies has been poorly understood, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis on 213 species (389 samples) in the Cynodonteae using sequence data from seven plastid regions (rps16-trnK spacer, rps16 intron, rpoC2, rpl32-trnL spacer, ndhF, ndhA intron, ccsA) and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS 1 & 2) to infer evolutionary relationships and refine the
    [Show full text]