Studies on Subject-Specific Requirements for Open Access Infrastructure Chr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Studies on Subject-Specific Requirements for Open Access Infrastructure Chr his study addresses subject-specific requirements for research infra- Studies on Tstructure with a focus on the influences of Open Access. Open Access is treated in a broad sense covering open access to literature, open data Subject-Specific and open science. Considering the wide variety of aspects to be analysed and the early stages of developing a general account of Open Access in- Requirements for frastructure, the study took a case-based approach and deliberately did not attempt to provide a representative account of research. In the prag- Open Access matic approach taken, six partners (institutions and organisations) were chosen to provide their subjective view on Open Access infrastructure. Infrastructure These partners are considered as exemplars of research and infrastruc- ture institutions in a given subject area. Edited by Christian Meier zu Verl and Wolfram Horstmann Chr. Meier zu Verl and W. Horstmann: Studies on Subject-Specific Requirements for Open Access Infrastructure Chr. Meier zu Verl and W. Horstmann: Studies on Subject-Specific ISBN 978-3-943363-00-5 oa-casestudies_cover_121114.indd 1 14.11.2012 15:40:08 Studies on Subject-Specific Requirements for Open Access Infrastructure Edited by Christian Meier zu Verl and Wolfram Horstmann Editorial arrangement and Chapter A, H Christian Meier zu Verl and Wolfram Horstmann 2011 Chapter B Hugo Besemer, Chris Addison, Francesca Pelloni, Enrica M. Porcari and Nadia Manning-Thomas 2011 Chapter C Dennis Spohr and Philipp Cimiano 2011 Chapter D Leonardo Candela, Akrivi Katifori and Paolo Manghi 2011 Chapter E Arjan Hogenaar, Heiko Tjalsma and Mike Priddy 2011 Chapter F Ilse Hamann 2011 Chapter G Johanna McEntyre and Alma Swan 2011 First published 2011 Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld Universitätsstraße 25 D-33615 Bielefeld A catalogue record for this book is available from the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek ISBN: 978-3-943363-00-5 DOI: 10.2390/PUB-2011-1 $PWFSJNBHFCZ+POBUIBO;BOEFS!IUUQQIPUPHSBQIZK[OFUPSHVOEFSUIF$$CZ4"-JDFOTF Typeset: Da-TeX Gerd Blumenstein, Leipzig (Germany) Proofreading: Katharine Timberlake, Portknockie Banffshire (UK) Funded by the European Commission Contents Executive Summary 1 A Introduction 5 Christian Meier zu Verl and Wolfram Horstmann 1 Context.............................. 7 2 Scope............................... 10 3 Disciplines and institutions ................... 11 4 Methods.............................. 13 5 Research questions ........................ 15 6 Bibliography ........................... 16 B Agricultural Research 19 Hugo Besemer, Chris Addison, Francesca Pelloni, Enrica M. Porcari and Nadia Manning-Thomas 1 Introduction ............................ 19 1.1 Case study: socioeconomic surveys: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) ........... 21 1.2 Case study: ongoing agricultural research and develop- ment capacity survey ................... 23 1.3 Case study: multisite agricultural trial database for cli- mate change analysis ................... 25 1.4 Case study: plant genetics resources: the Singer system and further ........................ 27 2 Current status of research infrastructure workflows and re- search life cycle .......................... 29 2.1 Introduction to the research infrastructure ....... 29 2.2 Scientists, centres and system-wide programmes . 30 2.3 Knowledge sharing .................... 30 3 Current status of Open Access in agriculture ......... 32 3.1 Coverage of agricultural Open Access journals in sci- entific journal metrics indexes .............. 32 3.2 Open Access repositories in the CGIAR ........ 35 3.3 Open Access mandates .................. 38 Contents 4 Open Access to data: overview of CGIAR data sets ...... 39 4.1 Introduction ....................... 39 4.2 Outside the star system ................. 39 4.3 Data available online in publications .......... 41 4.4 Structured data sets ................... 43 4.5 Data portals ....................... 50 5 Challenges and opportunities .................. 52 5.1 Challenges ........................ 52 5.2 Opportunities ....................... 53 6 Future directions and summary ................. 54 6.1 Provision of data sets with publications ........ 54 6.2 More work on interactive data visualisations ...... 55 6.3 Publishing data in more interactive formats ...... 55 6.4 Application programming interfaces .......... 56 6.5 Knowledge sharing .................... 56 6.6 Promotion ......................... 58 6.7 Collaborative efforts ................... 60 6.8 Ubiquitous telecommunications infrastructure ..... 60 6.9 Cloud computing ..................... 62 6.10 Increased use of spatial analysis and GIS ....... 64 7 List of figures ........................... 65 8 Listoftables........................... 65 9 Bibliography ........................... 65 10 Further reading .......................... 66 11 Glossary.............................. 68 C Information and Communication Technology 69 Dennis Spohr and Philipp Cimiano 1 History, structure and mission .................. 69 2 Methodology ........................... 72 2.1 Introductory interview .................. 72 2.2 Observation ........................ 72 2.3 Questionnaire ....................... 72 2.4 Semi-structured interview ................ 73 2.5 Website analysis of publication behaviour ....... 73 3 Case narratives .......................... 74 3.1 Behavioural sciences, natural sciences and neuroscience (BehNatNeur) ...................... 74 3.2 Social sciences and humanities (SocHum) ....... 79 3.3 Theoretical and applied computer science (CompSci) . 82 3.4 Robotics and engineering (RobEng) .......... 85 4 Representativeness of this case study . ........... 89 vi Contents 5 Current status of research infrastructure ............ 90 5.1 Infrastructural facilities and services .......... 91 5.2 Overview of the data lifecycle .............. 99 6 Current status of Open Access to literature . ......... 106 6.1 Results of questionnaire ................. 106 6.2 Results of empirical website analysis .......... 106 6.3 Discussion of results . .................. 107 7 Current status of Open Access to research data ........ 109 7.1 Policies and limits .................... 109 7.2 Willingness to share data ................ 110 7.3 Discussion of results . .................. 110 8 Challenges ............................. 115 8.1 Data management .................... 115 8.2 Publication management ................. 118 9 Future developments ....................... 119 9.1 Literature management . ................ 119 9.2 Data management .................... 120 10 Implications for Open Access infrastructure .......... 121 10.1 Technical implications .................. 121 10.2 Scholarly implications .................. 121 11 Acknowledgements........................ 122 12 Listoffigures........................... 122 13 List of tables ........................... 124 D e-Infrastructures Area 125 Leonardo Candela, Akrivi Katifori and Paolo Manghi 1 Introduction ............................ 125 2 Methodology and representativeness of the study ....... 126 3 Case narratives .......................... 128 3.1 D-Lib research group ................... 128 3.2 Agro-Know ........................ 134 3.3 National Documentation Center (EKT) ........ 137 3.4 Greek Research & Technology Network (GRNET) . 140 3.5 MADGIK research group ................ 143 3.6 Engineering R&D Unit on Clouds and distributed com- puting infrastructures .................. 146 4 Current status .......................... 151 4.1 Researchdata....................... 153 4.2 Literature ......................... 155 4.3 Linking literature and research data .......... 156 4.4 Open Access ....................... 156 vii Contents 5 Desiderata and future directions ................ 158 5.1 Research data ....................... 158 5.2 Literature ......................... 159 5.3 Linking literature and research data .......... 159 5.4 Open Access ....................... 160 5.5 A research infrastructure for e-Infrastructure researchers........................ 160 6 List of figures ........................... 162 7 Listoftables........................... 162 8 Bibliography ........................... 162 E Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences 165 Arjan Hogenaar, Heiko Tjalsma and Mike Priddy 1 Introduction ............................ 165 2 Workflows in social sciences and humanities research ..... 167 2.1 Phasesinsocialscienceresearch............ 167 2.2 The lifecycle in the humanities ............. 167 3 Case studies . .......................... 169 3.1 Archaeology ....................... 169 3.2 Political science ...................... 176 3.3 History .......................... 178 3.4 Law............................ 181 3.5 Economics, social science ................ 182 3.6 Linguistics ........................ 184 3.7 E-Science ......................... 185 3.8 Important general issues ................. 187 4 Current status of Open Access ................. 187 4.1 Data . .......................... 187 4.2 Publications ........................ 189 5 Current research infrastructure projects ............ 191 5.1 AlfaLab .......................... 192 5.2 Connecting ARchaeology and ARchitecture to Euro- peana (CARARE) .................... 193 5.3 Council of European Social Science Data Archives (CESSDA) . ...................... 194 5.4 Common Language Resources and Technology Infras- tructure (CLARIN) ................... 194 5.5 CLIO-INFRA ....................... 195 5.6 Digital Collaboratory for Cultural Dendrochronology (DCCD) .........................
Recommended publications
  • ESPON DIGIPLAN Case Study France.Pdf
    TARGETED ANALYSIS // DIGIPLAN – Digital plans and plan data in France Annex 5 of final report Final report // June 2021 This Targeted analysis is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States, the United Kingdom and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinions of members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Coordination and Outreach Christian Fertner, University of Copenhagen and Piera Petruzzi, ESPON EGTC Authors Norwegian University of Life Science (Norway): Marius Grønning, Marc Le Diraison University of Copenhagen (Denmark): Christian Fertner, Sara Folvig Cite as ESPON DIGIPLAN (2021) DIGIPLAN – Digital plans and plan data in France. Annex 5 of final report. https://www.espon.eu/digiplan. Advisory group Stakeholders: Ole Pagh Schlegel and Bent Lindhardt Andersen, Danish Housing and Planning Authority, DK | Hilde Johansen Bakken, Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation, NO | Silvia Jost, Yves Maurer and Marc Pfister, Swiss Federal Office of Spatial Development, CH ESPON EGTC: Piera Petruzzi (Senior Project Expert), György Alföldy (Financial expert) Acknowledgements We thank the experts for their participation in the interviews. Information on ESPON and its projects can be found at www.espon.eu. The website provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. ISBN: 978-2-919795-63-5 © ESPON, 2021 Published in June 2021 Graphic design by BGRAPHIC, Denmark Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS for National Mapping and Charting
    copyright swisstopo GIS for National Mapping and Charting Esri® GIS Solutions in Europe GIS for National Mapping and Charting Solutions for Land, Sea, and Air National mapping organisations (NMOs) are under pressure to generate more products and services in less time and with fewer resources. On-demand products, online services, and the continuous production of maps and charts require modern technology and new workflows. GIS for National Mapping and Charting Esri has a history of working with NMOs to find solutions that meet the needs of each country. Software, training, and services are available from a network of distributors and partners across Europe. Esri’s ArcGIS® geographic information system (GIS) technology offers powerful, database-driven cartography that is standards based, open, and interoperable. Map and chart products can be produced from large, multipurpose geographic data- bases instead of through the management of disparate datasets for individual products. This improves quality and consistency while driving down production costs. ArcGIS models the world in a seamless database, facilitating the production of diverse digital and hard-copy products. Esri® ArcGIS provides NMOs with reliable solutions that support scientific decision making for • E-government applications • Emergency response • Safety at sea and in the air • National and regional planning • Infrastructure management • Telecommunications • Climate change initiatives The Digital Atlas of Styria provides many types of map data online including this geology map. 2 Case Study—Romanian Civil Aeronautical Authority Romanian Civil Aeronautical Authority (RCAA) regulates all civil avia- tion activities in the country, including licencing pilots, registering aircraft, and certifying that aircraft and engine designs are safe for use.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan4all Geoportal: Web of Spatial Data
    WWW 2012 – European Projects Track April 16–20, 2012, Lyon, France Plan4All GeoPortal: Web of Spatial Data Evangelos Sakkopoulos1, Tomas Mildorf2, Karel Charvat3, Inga Berzina4, Kai-Uwe Krause5 1University of Patras 2University of 3 Help Service 4 Zemgale 5HafenCity Computer Eng. & West Bohemia Remote Sensing Planning Universität Informatics Pilsen, Czech Republic Czech Republic Region Hamburg, Patras, Greece Latvia Germany E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The Plan4all consortium is composed of 24 partners from 15 Plan4All project contributes on the harmonization of spatial data European countries. It also includes 127 affiliated partners and related metadata in order to make them available through forming a wide network of excellence in spatial data provision. Web across a linked data platform. A prototype of a Web search The Plan4all GeoPortal provides the means to search for spatial European spatial data portal is already available at data sets and spatial data services coming from all participating http://www.plan4all.eu. The key aim is to provide a methodology countries after a methodological harmonization. It allows the user and present best practices towards the standardization of spatial to view and download spatial data sets (subject to access data according to the INSPIRE principles and provide results that restrictions) and related metadata. The online Plan4all GeoPortal would be a reference material for linking data and data allows discovery and viewing of spatial data sets and services. specification from the spatial planning point of view. The results Plan4All focused mainly on the spatial planning side of spatial include methodology and implementation of multilingual search data as they included a wealth of underlying information for for data and common portrayal rules for content providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Iv the Future of Collaborations
    PART IV THE FUTURE OF COLLABORATIONS 25 COLLABORATION USING OPEN NOTEBOOK SCIENCE IN ACADEMIA Jean - Claude Bradley , Andrew S. I. D. Lang , Steve Koch , and Cameron Neylon 25.1 Introduction 426 25.2 Open Notebook Science 427 25.3 UsefulChem Project 427 25.3.1 Platforms 427 25.3.2 Medicinal Chemistry: Collaborations Between Synthetic Chemists, Computational Chemists, and Biochemists 429 25.3.3 Chemical Synthesis Strategy: Collaborations Between Synthetic Chemists, Both Locally and Remotely 430 25.3.4 Cheminformatics: Collaborations Between Chemists and Programmers 431 25.3.5 Second Life 433 25.3.6 Requesting Collaboration 433 25.3.7 Sharing Drafts of Papers and Proposals 434 25.3.8 Media Coverage: Collaborations with Journalists and Authors 434 25.3.9 Other Open Notebook Science Projects 434 25.3.10 Other Types of Collaboration 435 25.4 Open Notebook Science Solubility Challenge Collaborations 436 25.4.1 Crowdsourcing Solubility Measurements 436 25.4.2 Sponsorship 437 25.4.3 Gaining Experience with Laboratory Rotations 437 Collaborative Computational Technologies for Biomedical Research, First Edition. Edited by Sean Ekins, Maggie A. Z. Hupcey, Antony J. Williams. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 425 426 COLLABORATION USING OPEN NOTEBOOK SCIENCE IN ACADEMIA 25.4.4 Solubility Modeling and Visualization 437 25.4.5 ChemTaverna and MyExperiment 437 25.5 Open Notebook Science in Undergraduate Physics Laboratory Hosted on OpenWetWare 438 25.5.1 Overview 438 25.5.2 Description of How Students and Instructor
    [Show full text]
  • University Library
    University Library. Report to the University of Sheffield Research Data Management Service Delivery Group Research Data Management Technical Infrastructure: A Review of Options for Development at the University of Sheffield Date: Version 2.5 25/11/2014 Version 1.0 12/05/2014 Author: John A. Lewis Executive Summary This report reviews the options available for the development of a technical infrastructure, the software and hardware systems, to support Research Data Management (RDM) at the University of Sheffield. The appropriate management of research data throughout the data lifecycle, during and after the research project, is considered good research practice. This involves data management planning during the research proposal stage; looking after active data, its creation, processing, storage and access during the project; and data stewardship, long-term curation, publishing and reuse of archive data after the end of the project. Good RDM practice benefits all stakeholders in the research process: Researchers, will secure their data against loss or unauthorized access, and may increase research impact through publishing data; Research institutions may consider research data as ‘special collections’ and will need to minimise risk to data and damage to reputation; Research Funders wish to maximise the impact of the research they fund by enabling reuse; Publishers may wish to add value to research papers by publishing the underlying data. Many research funders now mandate RDM procedures, particularly Data Management Planning (DMP), and the UK research councils policies have contributed to the RCUK common principles on data policy. Notice must be taken of the EPSRC Expectations of organisations receiving EPSRC funding. These include the requirements that the organisation will: Publish appropriately structured metadata describing the research data they hold - therefore the institution must create a public data catalogue.
    [Show full text]
  • National INSPIRE Geoportal of the Czech Republic Jan Prášek, Jiří Valta, Jiří Hřebíček
    National INSPIRE Geoportal of the Czech Republic Jan Prášek, Jiří Valta, Jiří Hřebíček To cite this version: Jan Prášek, Jiří Valta, Jiří Hřebíček. National INSPIRE Geoportal of the Czech Republic. 10th International Symposium on Environmental Software Systems (ISESS), Oct 2013, Neusiedl am See, Austria. pp.425-438, 10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_40. hal-01457473 HAL Id: hal-01457473 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01457473 Submitted on 6 Feb 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License National INSPIRE Geoportal of the Czech Republic Jan Prášek1, Jiří Valta1, and Jiří Hřebíček2 1Czech Environmental Information Agency, Vršovická 1442/65 100 10 Praha 10, Czech Republic 2 Masaryk University, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic {jan.prasek, jiri.valta}@cenia.cz, [email protected] Abstract Environmental information systems of the Czech Republic´s Ministry of Environment have been developed since 1990. Creation of the National In- formation System to Collect and Evaluate Information on Environmental Pollu- tion began in 2010. This project has been co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Research in Sustainability
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Department of Materials Science and Department of Materials Science and Engineering Publications Engineering 8-15-2012 Open Source Research in Sustainability Joshua M. Pearce Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/materials_fp Recommended Citation oshua M. Pearce, “Open Source Research in Sustainability”, Sustainability the Journal of Record, 5(4), pp. 238-243, 2012. http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/materials_fp/44 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/materials_fp Published as: Joshua M. Pearce, “Open Source Research in Sustainability”, Sustainability the Journal of Record, 5(4), pp. 238-243, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sus.2012.9944 Open Source Research in Sustainability Joshua M. Pearce Department of Materials Science & Engineering Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan Technological University 601 M&M Building 1400 Townsend Drive Houghton, MI 49931-1295 906-487-1466 [email protected] Abstract Most academics, who as researchers and teachers dedicate their lives to information sharing, would likely agree with much of the hacker ethic, which is a belief that information-sharing is a powerful positive good and there is an ethical duty to share expertise by writing free and open-source code and facilitating access to information wherever possible. However, despite a well-established gift culture similar to that of the open source software movement in academic publishing and the tenure process many academics fail to openly provide the “source” (e.g. data sets, literature reviews, detailed experimental methodologies, designs, and open access to results) of their research. Closed research is particularly egregious when it could be used to accelerate the transition to a sustainable world and this transition is hobbled by antiquated research methodologies that slow the diffusion of innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Workingwiki: a Mediawiki-Based Platform for Collaborative Research
    WorkingWiki: a MediaWiki-based platform for collaborative research Lee Worden McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, United States [email protected] Abstract WorkingWiki is a software extension for the popular MediaWiki platform that makes a wiki into a powerful environment for collaborating on publication-quality manuscripts and software projects. Developed in Jonathan Dushoff’s theoretical biology lab at McMaster University and available as free software, it allows wiki users to work together on anything that can be done by using UNIX commands to transform textual “source code” into output. Researchers can use it to collaborate on programs written in R, python, C, or any other language, and there are special features to support easy work on LATEX documents. It develops the potential of the wiki medium to serve as a combination collaborative text editor, development environment, revision control system, and publishing platform. Its potential uses are open-ended — its processing is controlled by makefiles that are straightforward to customize — and its modular design is intended to allow parts of it to be adapted to other purposes. Copyright c 2011 by Lee Worden ([email protected]). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. The human readable license can be found here: http: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. 1 Introduction The remarkable success of Wikipedia as a collaboratively constructed repository of human knowledge is strong testimony to the power of the wiki as a medium for online collaboration. Wikis — websites whose content can be edited by readers — have been adopted by great numbers of diverse groups around the world hoping to compile and present their shared knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Workingwiki: a Mediawiki-Based Platform for Collaborative Research
    WorkingWiki: a MediaWiki-based platform for collaborative research Lee Worden McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, United States [email protected] Abstract WorkingWiki is a software extension for the popular MediaWiki platform that makes a wiki into a powerful environment for collaborating on publication-quality manuscripts and software projects. Developed in Jonathan Dushoff’s theoretical biology lab at McMaster University and available as free software, it allows wiki users to work together on anything that can be done by using UNIX commands to transform textual “source code” into output. Researchers can use it to collaborate on programs written in R, python, C, or any other language, and there are special features to support easy work on LATEX documents. It develops the potential of the wiki medium to serve as a combination collaborative text editor, development environment, revision control system, and publishing platform. Its potential uses are open-ended — its processing is controlled by makefiles that are straightforward to customize — and its modular design is intended to allow parts of it to be adapted to other purposes. Copyright c 2011 by Lee Worden ([email protected]). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. The human readable license can be found here: http: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. 1 Introduction The remarkable success of Wikipedia as a collaboratively constructed repository of human knowledge is strong testimony to the power of the wiki as a medium for online collaboration. Wikis — websites whose content can be edited by readers — have been adopted by great numbers of diverse groups around the world hoping to compile and present their shared knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • RDM Technical Infrastructure Components and Evaluations
    RDM Technical Infrastructure Components and Evaluations John A. Lewis 13/11/2014 Contents RDM Technical Infrastructure Components ……………………………………………………………1 1. Integrated systems and integrating components …………………………………………………………1 2. Repository platforms …………………………………………………………………………………………………...2 3. Digital preservation (repository) systems and services ……………………………………………….4 4. ‘Archive Data’ storage ………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 5. ‘Active data’ management and collaboration platforms ……………………………………………..7 6. Catalogue software / Access platforms ………………………………………………………………………..9 7. Current Research Information Systems (CRIS)…………………………………………………………….10 8. Data management planning (DMP) tools ……………………………………………………………………11 9. Metadata Generators ………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 10. Data capture and workflow management systems …………………………………………………….11 11. Data transfer protocols ……………………………………………………………………………………………….14 12. Identifier services and identity components ………………………………………………………………14 13. Other software systems and platforms of interest …………………………………………………….16 Reviews, Evaluations and Comparisons of Infrastructure Components .………17 References …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….22 RDM Technical Infrastructure Components Components of the RDM Infrastructures established by higher education institutions are briefly considered below. The component function, the software / platform underlying the component and component interoperability are described, any evaluations identified, and institutions employing the component,
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry& Metabolism Chemical Information National Library Of
    Chemistry& Metabolism Chemical Information National Library of Medicine Chemical Resources of the Environmental Health & Toxicology Information Program chemistry.org: American Chemical Society - ACS HomePage Identified Compounds — Metabolomics Fiehn Lab AOCS > Publications > Online Catalog > Modern Methods for Lipid Analysis by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry and Related Techniques (Lipase Database) Lipid Library Lipid Library Grom Analytik + HPLC GmbH: Homepage Fluorescence-based phospholipase assays—Table 17,3 | Life Technologies Phosphatidylcholine | PerkinElmer MetaCyc Encyclopedia of Metabolic Pathways MapMan Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology MS analysis MetFrag Scripps Center For Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry - XCMS MetaboAnalyst Lipid Analysis with GC-MS, LC-MS, FT-MS — Metabolomics Fiehn Lab MetLIn LOX and P450 inhibitors Lipoxygenase inhibitor BIOMOL International, LP - Lipoxygenase Inhibitors Lipoxygenase structure Lypoxygenases Lipoxygenase structure Plant databases (see also below) PlantsDB SuperSAGE & SAGE Serial Analysis of Gene Expression: Information from Answers.com Oncology: The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center EMBL Heidelberg - The European Molecular Biology Laboratory EMBL - SAGE for beginners Human Genetics at Johns Hopkins - Kinzler, K Serial Analysis of Gene Expression The Science Creative Quarterly » PAINLESS GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING: SAGE (SERIAL ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION) IDEG6 software home page (Analysis of gene expression) GenXPro :: GENome-wide eXpression PROfiling
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: a Review and Research Challenges
    Title: Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challenges Authors (with equal contribution): Songnian Li *, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada, [email protected] Suzana Dragicevic, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, [email protected] François Anton, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, [email protected] Monika Sester, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, [email protected] Stephan Winter, University of Melbourne, Australia, [email protected] Arzu Coltekin, University of Zurich, Switzerland, [email protected] Chris Pettit, University of Melbourne, Australia, [email protected] Bin Jiang, University of Gävle, Sweden, [email protected] James Haworth, University College London, UK, [email protected] Alfred Stein, University of Twente, The Netherlands, [email protected] Tao Cheng, University College London, UK, [email protected] * Corresponding author 1 Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challenges Abstract: Big data has now become a strong focus of global interest that is increasingly attracting the attention of academia, industry, government and other organizations. Big data can be classified in the disciplinary area of traditional geospatial data handling theory and methods. The increasing volume and varying format of collected geospatial big data presents challenges in storing, managing, processing, analysing, visualising and verifying the quality of data. This has implications for the quality of decisions made with big data. Consequently, this position paper of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) Technical Commission II (TC II) revisits the existing geospatial data handling methods and theories to determine if they are still capable of handling emerging geospatial big data.
    [Show full text]